<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Philosophy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/philosophy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:49:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The 10 nerdiest jokes of all time</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/the_ten_nerdiest_jokes_of_all_time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/the_ten_nerdiest_jokes_of_all_time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 23:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nerdy jokes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Courtesy of a Reddit thread, these will make you the toast of your next philosophy study group]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philosophers are hilarious (it's practically axiomatic). Courtesy of this "intellectual joke" thread on <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/1h1cyg/whats_the_most_intellectual_joke_you_know/">Reddit</a>, here are 10 (almost) one-liners ideal for dominating parties (well, maybe a sherry tasting at Frasier's or at a meeting of the <a href="http://thenewinquiry.com/">the New Inquiry</a>, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/01/fashion/new-yorks-literary-cubs.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">New York Times' favorite literary rabble-rousers)</a>.</p><p>1. This should elicit at least a polite "heh" from people who relish the chance to explain the semantic difference between solipsism and narcissism (or egoism), which of course means anyone who can:</p><blockquote><p>"Is it solipsistic in here, or is it just me?"</p></blockquote><p>2. Is there ever a wrong moment to make an existential funny?</p><blockquote><p>"Jean-Paul Sartre is sitting at a French cafe, revising his draft of Being and Nothingness. He says to the waitress, 'I'd like a cup of coffee, please, with no cream.' The waitress replies, I'm sorry, Monsieur, but we're out of cream. How about with no milk?'"</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/the_ten_nerdiest_jokes_of_all_time/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/the_ten_nerdiest_jokes_of_all_time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Be employable, study philosophy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/be_employable_study_philosophy_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/be_employable_study_philosophy_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Tyee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postmodernism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13347105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The discipline teaches you how to think clearly, a gift that can be applied to just about any line of work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thetyee.ca/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/logo-4.png" alt="The Tyee" width="150" align="left" /></a> It must be summer. In anticipation of fall course schedules, several people have asked what I think someone who wants to be a journalist should study.</p><p>A few years ago I realized my favourite answer -- not journalism -- was depressing for someone who had already reserved a seat for himself or his child at one of Canada's more than 50 journalism programs.</p><p>That's right: 50. According to <a href="http://j-source.ca/" target="_blank">J-Source</a>, the journalism website, there are 1,600 J-students at any given time preparing to work in an industry that has lost anywhere from one-third to half of its jobs in the last decade. The U.S. is always slightly ahead of us in trends, and in June the Chicago Sun-Times fired its entire photography staff, replacing it with iPhones for the remaining reporters. Since most reporters shoot about as well as most photogs spell, I'm breathlessly awaiting the next report of their declining circulation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/be_employable_study_philosophy_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/01/be_employable_study_philosophy_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Lord of the Rings&#8221; vs. &#8220;Game of Thrones&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/realpolitik_in_a_fictional_world_game_of_thrones_murky_morality_tale_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/realpolitik_in_a_fictional_world_game_of_thrones_murky_morality_tale_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game of Thrones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george r.r. martin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lord of the Rings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moral realism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Idealism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tolkien's epic fantasy seems downright naive compared to George R.R. Martin's post-Cold War political parable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p>HBO’s <em><a href="http://www.hbo.com/game-of-thrones/index.html" target="_blank">Game of Thrones</a></em> returned for its third season on Sunday having already inspired a variety of media, from a Helmut Lang <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2012/02/game-of-thrones-helmut-lang.html" target="_blank">line of clothing</a> to satires like <a href="http://www.pastemagazine.com/blogs/awesome_of_the_day/2013/03/school-of-thrones-game-of-thrones-as-a-high-school-dramedy.html" target="_blank">School of Thrones</a>, <a href="http://www.gq.com/entertainment/movies-and-tv/201303/game-of-thrones-cats-photos#slide=1" target="_blank">Game of Cats</a>, and a <a href="http://jezebel.com/5990473/what-if-game-of-thrones-was-a-90s-sitcom" target="_blank">’90s version</a> of the opening credits (set, of course, to Queen’s “I Want It All.”) Like the novels on which the show is partly based, <em>Game of Thrones</em> has resonated with viewers in a way that only a handful of shows have.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/realpolitik_in_a_fictional_world_game_of_thrones_murky_morality_tale_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/realpolitik_in_a_fictional_world_game_of_thrones_murky_morality_tale_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The question libertarians just can&#8217;t answer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/the_question_libertarians_just_cant_answer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/the_question_libertarians_just_cant_answer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Marx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Japan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Zealand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infant mortality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13316964</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If your approach is so great, why hasn’t any country anywhere in the world ever tried it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are there no libertarian countries? If libertarians are correct in claiming that they understand how best to organize a modern society, how is it that not a single country in the world in the early twenty-first century is organized along libertarian lines?</p><p>It’s not as though there were a shortage of countries to experiment with libertarianism. There are 193 sovereign state members of the United Nations—195, if you count the Vatican and Palestine, which have been granted observer status by the world organization. If libertarianism was a good idea, wouldn’t at least one country have tried it? Wouldn’t there be at least one country, out of nearly two hundred, with minimal government, free trade, open borders, decriminalized drugs, no welfare state and no public education system?</p><p>When you ask libertarians if they can point to a libertarian country, you are likely to get a baffled look, followed, in a few moments, by something like this reply: While there is no purely libertarian country, there are countries which have pursued policies of which libertarians would approve: Chile, with its experiment in privatized Social Security, for example, and Sweden, a big-government nation which, however, gives a role to vouchers in schooling.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/the_question_libertarians_just_cant_answer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/the_question_libertarians_just_cant_answer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1373</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Hannah Arendt&#8221;: The big Twitter war of 1962</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/hannah_arendt_the_big_twitter_war_of_1962/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/hannah_arendt_the_big_twitter_war_of_1962/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nazi Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hannah Arendt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Heidegger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holocaust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adolf Eichmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Yorker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eichmann in Jerusalem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13312948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A strangely appropriate German film brings the hot-button "Eichmann in Jerusalem" controversy to life]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the early 1960s version of social media – the New York cocktail party – <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannah_Arendt">Hannah Arendt</a> was the very hottest of trending topics, and subject to much the same kind of distortion, misapprehension and groupthink we so often encounter today. German filmmaker Margarethe von Trotta’s talky but fascinating period drama <a href="http://www.zeitgeistfilms.com/film.php?directoryname=hannaharendt">“Hannah Arendt,”</a> starring von Trotta’s longtime collaborator Barbara Sukowa as the prickly, brilliant German-Jewish writer and scholar (Arendt disliked being called a philosopher), partly succeeds in bringing life to a long-forgotten dispute that divided the American intelligentsia.</p><p>When New Yorker editor William Shawn (neatly portrayed by British actor Nicholas Woodeson) assigned Arendt to cover the Jerusalem trial of accused Nazi war criminal Adolf Eichmann, he clearly knew he wasn’t going to get straightforward news reporting. A former prize pupil (and lover) of legendary philosopher and one-time Nazi <a href="http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger/‎">Martin Heidegger,</a> Arendt was already famous in academic circles for her books <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0156701537?tag=saloncom08-20">“The Origins of Totalitarianism”</a> and <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0226025985/?tag=saloncom08-20">“The Human Condition,”</a> both of which remain influential works of 20th-century political thought. She was also a Jew who had fled Germany after the rise of Hitler and briefly been interned in a French detention camp before escaping to the United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/hannah_arendt_the_big_twitter_war_of_1962/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/hannah_arendt_the_big_twitter_war_of_1962/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A rapper&#8217;s red scare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/lupe_fiasco_loses_control_of_twitter_account_after_writing_about_marxism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/lupe_fiasco_loses_control_of_twitter_account_after_writing_about_marxism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lupe fiasco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[talib kweli]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lupe Fiasco's management takes control of his Twitter feed following Marxist theory debate UPDATED]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grammy Award-winning rapper Lupe Fiasco, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ouLkKiVXqI">who once called President Barack Obama a terrorist</a>, is known for his outspokenness, provoking debates about politics, government and rap. In March, the <a href="http://www.theboombox.com/2013/01/17/lupe-fiasco-cancels-new-album-quits-twitter/">on-again-off-again Twitter user</a> drew fans in with a spirited <a href="http://www.pinkisthenewblog.com/2013-03-31/lupe-fiasco-and-talib-kweli-engage-in-an-awesome-twitter-debate-on-the-effects-of-negative-rap-lyrics">Twitter discussion over violence in rap</a> with socially conscious rappper Talib Kweli.</p><p>But Fiasco's Twitter presence is now at threat, as his management took control of his feed after the rapper prompted a conversation about Marxism:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/lupe_fiasco_loses_control_of_twitter_account_after_writing_about_marxism/screen_shot_2013_05_14_at_4_17_52_pm/" rel="attachment wp-att-13298587"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/Screen-Shot-2013-05-14-at-4.17.52-PM.png" alt="" title="Screen Shot 2013-05-14 at 4.17.52 PM" class="size-full wp-image-13298587" height="639" width="535" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/lupe_fiasco_loses_control_of_twitter_account_after_writing_about_marxism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/lupe_fiasco_loses_control_of_twitter_account_after_writing_about_marxism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self-help hits rock Botton</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/self_help_hits_rock_botton_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/self_help_hits_rock_botton_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alain de Botton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Republic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Austen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Stuart Mill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How to Change the World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13297491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philosopher Alain De Botton's new how-to series isn't just shallow, it's downright unhelpful]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1_sm.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /><br /> IS THE VERY IDEA of an intelligent self-help book a paradox? It is certainly trying to serve two demanding masters: philosophical speculation and practical action. After all, readers don’t pick up self-help books just to ruminate on life’s dilemmas, but to be guided to solutions. The new series of self-help books published by <a href="http://www.theschooloflife.com/" target="_blank">the London-based School of Life</a>, co-founded by the Swiss-born popular philosopher Alain de Botton, echoes the school’s lofty approach to problems, claiming to be “intelligent, rigorous, well-written new guides to everyday living.” Yet to peruse the School of Life’s calendar of classes is to fall into a vortex of jargon pitched somewhere between the banal banter of daytime talk shows and the schedule for a nightmarish New Age retreat: “How to Have Better Conversations,” “How to Realise Your Potential,” “Developing a Compassionate Mind: One Day Intensive,” “Philosophy Slam,” “Learning How to Say No,” “Getting Better at Online Dating,” “Resilience: One Day Workshop.” Before long, I was ready to sign up for “How to Stay Calm.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/self_help_hits_rock_botton_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/13/self_help_hits_rock_botton_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Derrida discovered Marx</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/grappling_with_specters_of_marx_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/grappling_with_specters_of_marx_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marxism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jacques derrida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Revisiting the post-structuralist's legendary lecture "Specters of Marx"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1_sm.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a> ON THE OCCASION of the 20th anniversary of the “Whither Marxism?” conference conceived by Stephen Cullenberg and Bernd Magnus and organized by the Center for Ideas and Society at the University of California, Riverside, we asked Peggy Kamuf to reflect on the lecture that Jacques Derrida delivered there: “Specters of Marx.” The lecture was eventually published as a book, translated into English by Kamuf, and subtitled The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the New International<em>. It stands as a landmark text in Derrida’s oeuvre.</em></p><p>¤</p><p>“I meant to read Marx my way when the time came.” So Jacques Derrida declared in an interview with Michael Sprinker in 1989. Four years later, the conference “Whither Marxism?” was going to give him the occasion to do just that: read Marx his way. That was also the year, of course, the Berlin Wall fell, and then the dominoes continued to fall all over the former Communist bloc. So — in the ruins of Marxism, on the grave (good riddance!) of Marxist-Leninist-Stalinism, or whatever name is finally settled upon for the monstrous construction that had just fallen apart — the time had finally come to read Marx.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/grappling_with_specters_of_marx_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/grappling_with_specters_of_marx_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HP Lovecraft, pulp philosopher</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/weird_science_on_the_wacky_world_of_hp_lovecraft_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/weird_science_on_the_wacky_world_of_hp_lovecraft_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 20:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hp lovecraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science-fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Graham Harman's "Weird Realism" examines the metaphysical underpinnings of the cult author's bizarre oeuvre\]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" /></a>H.P. LOVECRAFT'S WORK has not received a great deal of attention from literary critics. Until relatively recently, the majority of “treatments” of his oeuvre have been in the form of B-movies. While it’s surprising that Roger Corman, director of seven features based on the stories of Lovecraft’s great predecessor, Poe, only did one Lovecraft film (<em>The Haunted Palace</em>, itself marketed as “Edgar Allan Poe’s <em>The Haunted Palace</em>,” despite being based on Lovecraft’s <em>The Case of Charles Dexter Ward</em>), some of the stable of effects of Lovecraft’s fiction — his characters’ tendencies to simply tell you their emotions (usually on a scale between repulsion and disgust), their inability to adequately describe the most startling creatures and architectures — make his stories ripe for the B-movie treatment. The telegraphed emotions of his characters justify stilted or hysterical acting, and the incomplete, contradictory visual descriptions of creatures like Cthulhu or the Old Ones — not to mention the “strange, beetling, table-like constructions suggesting piles of multitudinous rectangular slabs or circular plates or five-pointed stars” hovering miles above us in <em>At the Mountains of Madness</em> — seem to cry out for a gauzy camera style that conceals the tawdriness of the set design, the recycled monster costumes, and the failures of the lighting crew.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/weird_science_on_the_wacky_world_of_hp_lovecraft_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/weird_science_on_the_wacky_world_of_hp_lovecraft_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I woke up at age 35</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/i_woke_up_at_age_35/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/i_woke_up_at_age_35/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoholism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drinking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acceptance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something about being alone in the universe, and accepting reality, now rings true for me]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear reader,</p><p>I'd like to tell you a couple of things about my personal life and then I would like to make a request. Two things happened this week; one brought joy and one brought pain. I was told I'm still cancer-free. And our dog died.</p><p>Three years after surgery and proton beam radiation therapy for a sacral chordoma there is no sign of recurrence. Dr. Christopher Ames of UCSF, toward whom I have the crazy mix of extreme emotions one can only have toward a surgeon who has opened one up and carefully cut away bone and tissue and helped to make one whole again, said, "Go enjoy your life." So Norma and I went and had lunch at the Cliff House, on whose deck we were married almost 20 years ago.</p><p>Then our dog died. He was the second of our two standard poodles to die within the last year. That was rough.</p><p>Now we have no more dogs to die. We feel strangely alone in the house.</p><p>So it's been up and down, as life is. Those of you who have loved dogs and seen them die, and/or who have gone through the terror and pain of cancer surgery and radiation, will relate. I say this not to ask for sympathy but to signal that you and I are not alone in these things. I know you are out there and I know you know what it is like.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/i_woke_up_at_age_35/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/i_woke_up_at_age_35/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reddit launches original Web series</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/reddit_launches_original_web_series/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/reddit_launches_original_web_series/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reddit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explain this]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The site has launched three educational videos based on its "Explain Like I'm Five" subreddit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When most people think of Reddit, they imagine a trove of user-generated content and mishmash of links, the birthplace of new Internet memes and the door to the seedy underbelly of the Internet. Reddit is and always will be all of these things, but now it is one more: the creator of an educational Web series.</p><p>The latest organization to join media companies like Amazon and Netflix in producing original video content, the site's first series takes discussions from its <a href="http://www.reddit.com/r/explainlikeimfive/">"Explain Like I'm Five" subreddit</a> to explain in-depth concepts in an easily digestible format.</p><p>From THR:</p><blockquote><p>The "Explain Like I'm Five" subreddit, which the company says gets an estimated 4 million page-views monthly, was chosen because its discussion concept seemed fit for a video series.</p> <p>The series features actors Michael Kayne and Langan Kingsley explaining broad topics to children in a classroom. The series covers diverse subject matter: "The Crisis in Syria," "Existentialism and Friedrich Nietzsche" and "The Volatility of the Stock Market" are the titles of the three episodes.</p> <p>The ELIF series is produced by Jared Neumark, the founder of Landline TV and former co-director of content at College Humor. Each clip ends with a message pointing viewers to DonorsChoose.org, a online charity that helps provide teachers with classroom resources.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/reddit_launches_original_web_series/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/reddit_launches_original_web_series/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When is it ethical to kill somone?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/when_is_it_ethical_to_kill_somone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/when_is_it_ethical_to_kill_somone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Applied Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trolleyology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philosopher David Edmonds discusses the five books that have had the greatest influence on his work]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thebrowser.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thebrowser.com/sites/all/themes/brw/logo.png" alt="The Browser" width="150" align="left" /></a> <strong>Applied ethics should interest all but the most philosophy shy, as it poses moral questions of everyday use.</strong></p><p>Applied ethics is the application of moral theory to the real world. I first read the five books that we are going to talk about here 25 years ago, which was the beginning of a burgeoning of applied ethics, with people like <a href="http://thebrowser.com/interviews/jonathan-glover-on-moral-philosophy">Jonathan Glover</a> and <a href="http://thebrowser.com/recommended/life-you-can-save-by-peter-singer">Peter Singer</a> applying theory to real issues like euthanasia, <a href="http://thebrowser.com/reports/death-penalty">capital punishment</a>, poverty, distribution of income, animal rights, abortion – questions of life and death.</p><p><strong>Talking of which, I understand you’re a bit of an expert on “trolleyology”. What is a trolley problem?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/when_is_it_ethical_to_kill_somone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/when_is_it_ethical_to_kill_somone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to live well: A handy reading list</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/how_to_live_well_a_handy_reading_list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/how_to_live_well_a_handy_reading_list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Browser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Orwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry David Thoreau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Down and Out in Paris and London]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Philosopher Roman Krznaric discusses the five books that have helped shape his work, from Orwell to Thoreau]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thebrowser.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thebrowser.com/sites/all/themes/brw/logo.png" alt="The Browser" width="150" align="left" /></a> <strong>Over the New Year, people will be looking at themselves, making resolutions, starting afresh. Do you think that this introspection is a good thing, or are we too full of anxiety when we re-evaluate our lives?</strong></p><p>It’s important to keep asking yourself the question, what am I doing with my life? Shall I go in new directions? Throughout history there have always been people who have been interested in this question. Tolstoy, for example, was always asking himself whether he was doing the right thing with his life.</p><p>Of course, the New Year is a great peg to hang these questions. The real issue, though, is how we go about making changes in our lives. I like to make a distinction between introspection and outrospection. In the 20th century we were obsessed with introspection – the idea that the way to find meaning in our lives is to look inside us, at our drives, motivations and priorities. That introspective approach really comes out of psychoanalysis and the self-help industry.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/how_to_live_well_a_handy_reading_list/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/how_to_live_well_a_handy_reading_list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bible goes Greek</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/what_the_bible_and_the_greeks_have_in_common/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/what_the_bible_and_the_greeks_have_in_common/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13025165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Biblical scholar argues that the age-old feud between Athens and Jerusalem is a big misunderstanding]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE VIEW THAT ATHENS AND JERUSALEM represent two very different and antagonistic sources of Western civilization has long been a feature of the Western tradition. It dates back at least to Tertullian’s passionate second-century polemic against Greek philosophy. Those Enlightenment thinkers who preferred Greek reason to Hebrew revelation confirmed it resoundingly. And again just over a century ago, again from the side of Athens, the culture critic Matthew Arnold boiled down his civilization to two fundamental forces:</p><blockquote><p>And to give these forces names from the two races of men who have supplied the most signal and splendid manifestations of them, we may call them respectively the forces of Hebraism and Hellenism. Hebraism and Hellenism, - between these two points of influence moves our world.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los  Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a>Today as well — arguably to the greatest extent since the Enlightenment — the camps of religion and culture view each other with a deepening mutual distrust.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/what_the_bible_and_the_greeks_have_in_common/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/30/what_the_bible_and_the_greeks_have_in_common/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who will save the eurozone?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/who_will_save_the_euro_zone/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/who_will_save_the_euro_zone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 22:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurozone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13017157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Understanding the crisis and why foreign debts matter, with a little help from German philosopher Jürgen Habermas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>“WHO WILL WILLINGLY DIE for [. . .] the EEC?”</p></blockquote><p>When Benedict Anderson asked this sarcastic question in 1983, referring to the European Economic Community, a now-forgotten ancestor of today’s European Union, he did not have to add that, for better or worse, many people are willing to die for their nation. They’ve proved it, war after war after war. Anderson’s point was that nationalism moves mountains, but its potent we’re-all-in-it-together feeling tends to stop short at the border. The survival of your country may be capable of stirring your gutsiest emotions; the survival of the eurozone almost certainly isn’t. Unless you’re a banker.</p><p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/who_will_save_the_euro_zone/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/who_will_save_the_euro_zone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dumb tweet: Mike Tyson on the philosophy of mind</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/dumb_tweet_mike_tyson_on_the_philosophy_of_mind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/dumb_tweet_mike_tyson_on_the_philosophy_of_mind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boxing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Tyson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dumb tweet of the day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13017496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former boxer and current face tattoo-bearer tweets what we've all long known]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hat tip Jeremy Scahill for retweeting:</p><p>[embedtweet id="248900209722134528"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/dumb_tweet_mike_tyson_on_the_philosophy_of_mind/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/dumb_tweet_mike_tyson_on_the_philosophy_of_mind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is drone war moral?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/06/is_drone_war_moral/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/06/is_drone_war_moral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Strawser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Somalia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12973613</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: A philosopher's arguments in defense of drone strikes are both odious and wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[UPDATE BELOW]</strong></p><p>“I see mothers with children, I see fathers with children, I see fathers with mothers, I see kids playing soccer ... [but] I feel no emotional attachment to the enemy. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/30/us/drone-pilots-waiting-for-a-kill-shot-7000-miles-away.html?pagewanted=all">I have a duty, and I execute the duty.</a>” By their own accounts, drone pilots spend weeks stalking their targets -- observing the intimate patterns of their daily life such as playing with their children, meeting neighbors, talking to their wives -- before finding a moment when the family is away to launch the missile that will end their target's life. Afterward they drive home like any other commuter, perhaps stopping at a fast food restaurant or convenience store before coming home to their families for the night. “I feel like I’m doing the same thing I’ve always done, I just don’t deploy to do it.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/06/is_drone_war_moral/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/06/is_drone_war_moral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everyday ethics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/everyday_ethics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/everyday_ethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Browser]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12915101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A philosopher talks about what we owe future generations and whether we should be able to sell our organs]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given the choice between allowing five people to die and killing one person, what would you do? What is the utilitarian argument for vegetarianism? Should we be able to sell our kidneys? The philosopher suggests some answers.</p><p><a href="http://thebrowser.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://thebrowser.com/sites/all/themes/brw/logo.png" alt="The Browser" width="150" align="left" /></a><strong>Applied ethics should interest all but the most philosophy shy, as it poses moral questions of everyday use.</strong></p><p>Applied ethics is the application of moral theory to the real world. I first read the five books that we are going to talk about here 25 years ago, which was the beginning of a burgeoning of applied ethics, with people like <a href="http://thebrowser.com/interviews/jonathan-glover-on-moral-philosophy">Jonathan Glover</a> and <a href="http://thebrowser.com/recommended/life-you-can-save-by-peter-singer">Peter Singer</a> applying theory to real issues like euthanasia, <a href="http://thebrowser.com/reports/death-penalty">capital punishment</a>, poverty, distribution of income, animal rights, abortion – questions of life and death.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/everyday_ethics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/everyday_ethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The neuroscience of happiness</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/28/the_neuroscience_of_happiness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/28/the_neuroscience_of_happiness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12236911</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New discoveries are shedding light on the activities that make us happy. An expert explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They say money can’t buy happiness. But can a better understanding of your brain? As recent breakthroughs in cognitive science break new ground in the study of consciousness -- and its relationship to the physical body -- the mysteries of the mind are rapidly becoming less mysterious. But does this mean we’ll soon be able to locate a formula for good cheer?</p><p>Shimon Edelman, a cognitive expert and professor of psychology at Cornell University, offers some insight in <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-happiness-of-pursuit-shimon-edelman/1104516174?ean=9780465022243&amp;itm=2&amp;usri=happiness+of+pursuit">"The Happiness of Pursuit: What Neuroscience Can Teach Us About the Good Life."</a> In his new book, Edelman walks the reader through the brain’s basic computational skills – its ability to compute information, perform statistical analysis and weigh value judgments in daily life – as a way to explain our relationship with happiness. Our capacity to retain memories and develop foresight allows us to plan for the future, says Edelman, by using a mental “personal space-time machine” that jumps between past, present and future. It’s through this process of motivation, perception, thinking, followed by motor movement, that we’re able not only to survive, but to feel happy. From Bayes’ theorem of probability to Shakespeare’s "Romeo and Juliet," Edelman offers a range of references and allegories to explain why a changing, growing self, constantly shaped by new experiences, is happier than the satisfaction any end goal can give us. It turns out the rewards we get for learning and understanding the workings of the world really make it the journey, not the destination, that matters most.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/28/the_neuroscience_of_happiness/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/28/the_neuroscience_of_happiness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Socrates you don&#8217;t know</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/xenophon_socrates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/xenophon_socrates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/2011/09/14/xenophon_socrates</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Texts from Xenophon and Aristophanes paint an intriguingly different picture of the famed philosopher]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This year marks the hundredth anniversary of the <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/s/?store=book&amp;sid=192650" target="_blank">Loeb Classical Library</a>, one of the most remarkable publishing projects in modern history. Yet as with everything book-related in the year 2011, the Loeb centenary carries with it a touch of wistfulness, and an uncertainty about the future. For the Loeb classics are the monument of a book culture that now seems on the wane -- a culture that prized the making and owning of physical books, not just for the pleasure of turning the pages, but from a sense that the book was the natural, predestined vessel of every expression of human thought.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/xenophon_socrates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/xenophon_socrates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>