<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Plagiarism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/plagiarism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The National Review&#8217;s fake plagiarism scoop</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/the_national_reviews_fishy_plagiarism_scoop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/the_national_reviews_fishy_plagiarism_scoop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12923198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated: After falsely accusing Elizabeth Warren of plagiarism, the conservative magazine apologizes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Review says Elizabeth Warren is guilty of the gravest crime a writer can commit: Plagiarism. <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/300502/plagiarism-2006-book-co-authored-elizabeth-warren-katrina-trinko#">Katrina Trinko compares passages</a> from "All Your Worth: The Ultimate Money Lifetime Plan," Warren's book with her daughter, Amelia Warren Tyagi, with passages from "Getting on the Money Track," a book by Rob Black. The passages line up perfectly. The wording and even the punctuation are identical. It's plagiarism all right. Except it looks very much like Warren is actually the <em>victim.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/the_national_reviews_fishy_plagiarism_scoop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/the_national_reviews_fishy_plagiarism_scoop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coverup at Washington Times</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editors knew there was an apparent plagiarist on staff but let him keep writing. An exclusive look inside the paper]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During his long career, Arnaud de Borchgrave, a one-time Newsweek correspondent and editor, has earned his share of laurels. Fellow journalist Theodore H. White has called him one of “America's great foreign correspondents.” “In a job that requires bluff and bravado, he has outrun the best of them," Esquire gushed in a lengthy profile, which is quoted in de Borchgrave’s official bio. Along the way, he has also racked up some fancy titles, including director of the transnational threats project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.</p><p>These days, though, de Borchgrave is involved in some less praiseworthy pursuits. Alongside his other activities, the veteran newsman is a columnist for the Washington Times, the influential conservative broadsheet, where he once served as editor in chief. And in a handful of columns over the last year he has lifted passages verbatim, or nearly verbatim, from the Internet and other sources, without attribution — a fact the Washington Times' leadership tried to sweep under the rug, according to insiders at the paper.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salon debate: What is plagiarism?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/salon_debate_what_is_plagiarism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/salon_debate_what_is_plagiarism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10353461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allegations of plagiarism and copyright abuse have rocked the art world. Our panel debates where fair use ends]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last weeks of 2011 were <a href="http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-11-09/news/30379911_1_sloppy-firsts-literary-novels-publisher">littered</a> <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/155677/columbus-dispatch-editorial-cartoonist-resigns-after-plagiarism-accusations/">with</a> <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/10/beyonce-accused-of-plagiarism-over-video/">debates</a> <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/st-martins-press-defends-lenore-hart-on-plagiarism-charges_b43610">over</a> the originality of high-profile published work from spy novels to political cartoons -- and the supposed failure of prominent artists and creators to cite their source material. In the coming year, we're likely to see more pitched battles related to plagiarism and copyright infringements -- not least the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/01/arts/design/richard-prince-lawsuit-focuses-on-limits-of-appropriation.html?seid=auto&amp;smid=tw-nytimes&amp;pagewanted=all">much-buzzed-about appeal of artist Richard Prince</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/salon_debate_what_is_plagiarism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/salon_debate_what_is_plagiarism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A plagiarist&#8217;s lame excuse: Addiction made me do it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/a_plagiarists_lame_excuse_addiction_made_me_do_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/a_plagiarists_lame_excuse_addiction_made_me_do_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Rowan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10275961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disgraced thriller writer Quentin Rowan borrows from 12-step rhetoric in an unconvincing and insincere explanation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quentin Rowan had the briefest run ever as an acclaimed thriller writer. "Assassin of Secrets" was published this fall by Little, Brown under the pen name Q.R. Markham. But it was quickly discovered that the author's name wasn't the only unreal thing about him. "Assassin of Secrets" -- a <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-316-17646-0%20">"quirky, entertaining spy thriller"</a> -- cut and pasted whole chunks of books by spy masters Charles McCarry, Robert Ludlum, John Gardner and Adam Hall.</p><p>Little, Brown recalled and pulped the book, issuing the mortified admission that they had "published a book that we can no longer stand behind." Rowan's nerviest steals, laid out in exhausting detail on <a href="http://www.edrants.com/q-r-markham-plagiarist/">Reluctant Habits,</a> suggest he was unaware of the existence of Google. <em>Of course</em> he was going to be found out. So why did he do it?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/a_plagiarists_lame_excuse_addiction_made_me_do_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/a_plagiarists_lame_excuse_addiction_made_me_do_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Johann Hari suddenly in much more trouble</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/johann_hari/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/johann_hari/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/27/johann_hari</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The liberal UK journalist, accused of plagiarism, is now said to have invented a key part of an award-winning story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back when Johann Hari was <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/06/28/hari_plagiarism">just accused of plagiarism,</a> the scandal seemed survivable for the British celebrity lefty journalist. Hari was accused, basically, of regularly inserting quotations from outside sources into his "interviews" without citation. Which you're not supposed to do, though the "rules," in the U.K. newspaper world, are a bit lax. Now it looks suddenly a lot worse.</p><p><a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100098789/johann-hari-in-africa-the-crucial-emails/">The Telegraph accuses Hari</a> of inventing an atrocity in the story that won him the Orwell Prize. Hari <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/inside-frances-secret-war-396062.html">took a trip to the Central African Republic in 2007,</a> where he documented a covert French war being waged in support of a brutal dictator.</p><p>One of the most shocking claims: French soldiers told Hari that while serving in Rwanda, they were ordered not to help children who came to them holding their parents' severed heads. <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100098789/johann-hari-in-africa-the-crucial-emails/">But Hari's translator said no one ever told Hari this.</a> Here's a section from an email she wrote to Hari in 2007:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/johann_hari/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/johann_hari/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Bay plagiarizes Michael Bay for &#8220;Transformers 3&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Dark of the Moon's" dark secret: Shots from "The Island" appear in summer blockbuster]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most famous directors have a signature style that lets you know you are watching one of their films: David Lynch will give you red curtains and flickering matches, Scorsese will have "Gimmie Shelter" slipped somewhere in between the violent acts of mob crime, and Steven Spielberg ... well, Steven Spielberg <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2011/06/11/what_super_8_took_from_steven_spielberg/index.html">has a lot of recurring motifs</a>. But at what point does a cinematic thumbprint turn into lazy self-plagiarism?</p><p>The answer to this theoretical film query has been answered by none other than Michael Bay, whose auteur work can be boiled down to "big things blowing up or hitting other big things." But even with that not-too-original concept, Bay has gotten sloppy: allegedly taking direct shots from his 2005 flop "The Island" and putting them in "Transformers 3: Dark of the Moon."</p><p>Last week, a viral-video pirate named Jermain Odreman spent a considerable amount of time watching Bay's movies in slow-motion <a href="http://entertainment.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/07/05/michael-bay-recycles-footage-from-2005-film-for-transformers/">in order to catch almost identical sequences from both films</a>. The footage is unquestionably similar, down to the type of car that flips over, the angle of the smoke from the explosion, and the damage done by flying shrapnel.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Johann Hari in UK plagiarism row</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/hari_plagiarism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/hari_plagiarism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/28/hari_plagiarism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lefty hack's cut-and-paste chats spark Twitter furor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big UK press scandal, everyone! Johann Hari, a prize-winning superstar lefty columnist for the Independent, has been caught engaging in a bit of <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jun/28/johann-hari-twitter-plagiarism">light plagiarism.</a> Hari apparently routinely takes old quotes and writings from interview subjects and pastes them into his interviews, without attribution. He was caught by <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jun/28/johann-hari-twitter-plagiarism">a cadre of anonymous ultra-leftist bloggers known as the Deterritorial Support Grouppppp</a>, and, after a bit of a Twitter firestorm, called out in the rival Telegraph by <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyyoung/100094268/busted-johann-hari-is-guilty-of-shoddy-journalism/">Toby Young,</a> a British media person best known here for his failed stint as a "Top Chef" judge.</p><p>This quote-recycling (or inventing) is apparently a not-uncommon practice, Young says, though it's rare among the famous and successful:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/hari_plagiarism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/hari_plagiarism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marc Maron explains his podcasting infamy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/marc_maron_wtf_interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/marc_maron_wtf_interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/07/marc_maron_wtf_interview</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The host of the hit Internet series "WTF" talks about comedy, cantaloupes -- and his notorious celebrity interviews]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance, Marc Maron doesn't particularly strike me as the type of comedic personality who would thrive on the Internet. He's more old-school, often called "<a href="http://www.nerve.com/entertainment/2010/10/01/five-comedy-albums-that-changed-my-life">a comedian's comedian</a>," like those guys telling each other backstage jokes in "The Aristocrats." He's not had the same mainstream success as a lot of contemporaries, and can be confrontational (to say the least) with the guests that he hosts on his biweekly podcasts, "<a href="http://www.wtfpod.com">WTF With Marc Maron</a>," out of his garage in Los Angeles.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/marc_maron_wtf_interview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/marc_maron_wtf_interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chuck Norris is plagiarizing his conservative columns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/26/chuck_norris_plagiarism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/26/chuck_norris_plagiarism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorldNetDaily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/26/chuck_norris_plagiarism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The martial artist and unlikely right-wing celebrity seems to be borrowing paragraphs without attribution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a "Chuck Norris fact," for you: He is a plagiarist. The famous kick-boxing B-movie and television star is also a respected right-wing commentator, despite the fact that he is famous solely for kicking. He writes a column for <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/04/14/world_net_daily_mad">famously ridiculous</a> right-wing conspiracy website WorldNetDaily.</p><p>Wonkette caught him <a href="http://wonkette.com/444008/chuck-norris-plagiarizes-hatred-of-muslims&quot;">plagiarizing Fox News and the right-wing Middle East Quarterly</a> in <a href="http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=290997">yesterday's column</a> on the Sharia menace, then went back and noted <a href="http://wonkette.com/444199/chuck-norris-plagiarizes-in-his-column-all-the-time">multimple instances of pretty blatant</a> lifting of material from sources without attribution in other recent Norris columns. This is maybe why we shouldn't ask famous kickers-of-other-people to write so many political columns, every week. It's hard!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/26/chuck_norris_plagiarism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/26/chuck_norris_plagiarism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Barton&#8217;s climate report was plagiarized</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/plagiarized_climate_report_joe_barton/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/plagiarized_climate_report_joe_barton/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Nov 2010 23:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/22/plagiarized_climate_report_joe_barton</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas Republican asked a statistician to cast doubts on climate science]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of years ago, Rep. Joe Barton, R-Texas, asked a statistician named Edward Wegman to produce a report that would cast doubt on climate change science, because Barton -- then the chairman of the House energy committee -- is less a citizen legislator than the whims of the oil and gas industries made animate and elected to Congress.</p><p>The report criticized some statistics used to prove that the last century was the warmest one in centuries, which means it proved that global warming is pretend, in the eyes of most Republicans. (Although a follow-up report by the National Research Council "found that Wegman report-style criticisms of the type of statistics used in 1998 and 1999 papers reasonable but beside the point, as many subsequent studies had reproduced their finding that the 20th century was likely the warmest one in centuries.")</p><p><a href="http://www.usatoday.com/weather/climate/globalwarming/2010-11-21-climate-report-questioned_N.htm">And also huge chunks of the whole thing were plagiarized</a> -- from the textbook written by one of the attacked scientists himself, and from Wikipedia.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/plagiarized_climate_report_joe_barton/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/plagiarized_climate_report_joe_barton/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plagiarism: The next generation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/17/hegemann/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/17/hegemann/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2010/02/16/hegemann</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A 17-year-old novelist defends herself in the latest copycat scandal. Are we just too old to understand?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recent <a href="http://www.thelocal.de/society/20100209-25143.html">plagiarism accusations</a> against the 17-year-old author of a German novel feel like d&#233;j&#224; vu all over again, with one key distinction: Helene Hegemann, who wrote the best-selling tale of drugging and clubbing, "Axolotl Roadkill," is defending the practice, telling one German newspaper, "I myself don't feel it is stealing, because I put all the material into a completely different and unique context and from the outset consistently promoted the fact that none of that is actually by me."</p><p>Hegemann lifted as much as a full page of text from an obscure, independently published novel, "Strobo," by a blogger known as Airen. Another German blogger, Deef Pirmasens, was the first to point out the passages from "Axolotl Roadkill" that are said to be largely duplicated from "Strobo," with small changes. Despite the uproar caused by this revelation, "Axolotl Roadkill" has been selling better than ever and has been nominated for the $20,000 fiction prize at the Leipzig Book Fair. "Obviously, it isn't completely clean but, for me, it doesn't change my appraisal of the text," a jury member and newspaper book critic <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/12/world/europe/12germany.html?ref=books">told the New York Times,</a> explaining that the jury knew about the plagiarism accusations when it selected the novel for its short list. "I believe it's part of the concept of the book."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/17/hegemann/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/17/hegemann/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My graduate school classmate is plagiarizing. Should I tell?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/17/academic_ethics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/17/academic_ethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/since_you_asked//2004/12/17/academic_ethics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I discussed my discovery with her, but I'm not sure I want to take it any further.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Dear Cary,</b> </p><p><b>Since you seem to have become the unofficial voice of reason for adrift academics, I thought I'd write. A little over a month ago, I discovered that my closest friend in the department, N., was plagiarizing in her work. I entered in the first two sentences of her summary in Google and found the Web site that she had literally cut and pasted from.</b> </p><p><b>I don't really feel like making this an issue, but at times I want to. It angers me that she's going to get the same degree I am. I mean, this is graduate school and we've all given up a lot in our lives to be here. I think I deserve a classmate who at least attempts to do the work.</b> </p><p><b>I decided to confront her instead of the professor because I thought to myself that that's what a friend should do. But even though I'm no longer her friend, I'm still angry.</b> </p><p><b>Do I tell the professor? My classmates? The department chairperson? Or do I just keep a keen eye on her work next quarter to make sure she has ended her Google habits?</b> </p><p><b>Angry Classmate</b> </p><p>Dear Angry Classmate, </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2004/12/17/academic_ethics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2004/12/17/academic_ethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For the love of literature</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/25/fitzgerald_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/25/fitzgerald_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2001 19:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/sex/feature/2001/08/25/fitzgerald</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Fitzgerald stole Zelda's ideas, plagiarized her diaries and even pushed her into an affair. He was arguably the worst husband of his generation -- and that made him its best author.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When F. Scott Fitzgerald's second novel was published, a newspaper editor asked the author's wife whether she'd consider reviewing it for the New York Herald Tribune. As she read her husband's book with the sharp eye of a paid professional, she recognized not only the autobiographical tenor of "The Beautiful and Damned," but also, cleverly attributed to a female lead much like herself, whole passages authored by her: "It seems to me," she wrote in her review, "that on one page I recognized a portion of an old diary of mine which mysteriously disappeared shortly after my marriage, and also scraps of letters which, though considerably edited, sound to me vaguely familiar. In fact, Mr. Fitzgerald -- I believe that is how he spells his name -- seems to believe that plagiarism begins at home." </p><p>She was being modest. The truth is that Scott used a great deal of Zelda's writing, credited to characters he modeled after her, in every book he completed in his abbreviated life. That Zelda was Scott's muse is hardly news, and it comes as no surprise that her frank sexuality, the wild abandon with which she flaunted her body at parties, gave color to his stories: More has been written about the Fitzgeralds, their antics and affairs, than they can possibly have known about themselves. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2001/08/25/fitzgerald_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2001/08/25/fitzgerald_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Artemio Cruz is just a character in a book. Gen. Obregon was real!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/24/lastyear4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/24/lastyear4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/it/1999/09/24/lastyear4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When his students find reality more compelling than fiction, this teacher, a former anarchist, finds it hard to play the authority card.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b> got double-teamed in my "World Culture" class last semester by two women who provided me with the new rules for student intellectual conduct. We had just completed discussing Carlos Fuentes' novel "The Death of Artemio Cruz" when Beverly turned in her paper, ostensibly on the novel. It started with a short history of Gen. Obregon, who was president of Mexico from 1920 to 1925. She listed Obregon's achievements, concluding that he was the most progressive president in Mexico's modern history next to Cardenas. The only mention of Fuentes' novel was a remark that "Artemio Cruz lived during the time of Obregon's presidency." The thing went on for about five pages.</p><p>I wrote Beverly a short note: "Beverly, please see me. Your paper is about Gen. Obregon, not Fuentes' novel. David." Beverly appeared about a month later, after ignoring at least four reminders. She said, "What's wrong with it? I did the assignment."</p><p>"The assignment was to write something about the Fuentes novel," I said. "You barely mention the novel in your paper. There is only a bunch of stuff about Gen. Obregon."</p><p>Then she pulled out her notes from the day I gave the assignment and pointed to No. 14, which said, "Consider the historical context for the novel." She declared, "I did that."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/09/24/lastyear4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/09/24/lastyear4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Web&#039;s plagiarism police</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/plagiarism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/plagiarism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/feature/1999/06/14/plagiarism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An online service claims it can identify purloined papers. So why&#039;d it nail <i>my</i> thesis?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b> am a plagiarist.</p><p>At least, that's what an online plagiarism-testing service report says. After analyzing my senior thesis, it said flatly that my<br />
30-page paper was "plagiarized," and said that it had found a source on the<br />
Internet that matched my document. At first, I panicked. I hadn't copied anyone<br />
else's work, so what was going on? Was it unconscious, a phrase I'd once read and<br />
kept hidden in my memory? Had I been careless in paraphrasing or quoting? I<br />
didn't know; all I did know what that the report said I was guilty of ripping off<br />
my senior thesis from some source on the Web.</p><p>Baffled, I went back to the report, and there, I found less-than-intuitive links<br />
to a more detailed analysis. Clicking through, I found the section that listed<br />
the URL of the source I was accused of plagiarizing from. I clicked to find ...</p><p>To find that Plagiarism.org had just discovered a copy of my own thesis online.<br />
Instead of realizing that it was my work and ignoring it, the service had accused<br />
me of plagiarism. It seemed an odd thing to overlook, and an odd way of doing<br />
business to announce the crime, and let the recipient of the report figure out<br />
whether it was justified or not. I took the time to investigate the report's<br />
charges; what if a professor hadn't?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/plagiarism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/14/plagiarism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Circus: Get your bodice-ripping hands off my genre!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1997/10/07/romance_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1997/10/07/romance_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 1997 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/circus/1997/10/07/romance</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There hasn&#039;t been a heaving bosom in a decent romance novel for years -- but there has been plenty of guilt-free, female-friendly sex. Maybe that&#039;s why men keep bashing romances.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font size="+1" color="#000000">M</font>y heroine has just turned into an insipid twit, someone totally out of place in a fast-paced, '90s romance novel. I think it's because I named her Ivy, wanting to suggest whimsy, caprice, imagination. Instead, I'm starting to associate her with the more annoying qualities of that vine: She's clingy, decorative and totally green. My hero, a self-made computer geek millionaire in his 30s, is not stirring lust in her heart or mine, possessing, as he does, not just David Duchovny's gorgeous face but Bill Gates' icy soul. But if he's not cyber-rich, how else can I plunk him down into a small town when he has no visible means of support? Making him a serial killer is an obvious, but unworkable, solution.</p><p>Deciding I can think more clearly about this with latte at hand, I drive to the local book superstore/cafe, where the magazines are all abuzz over a plagiarism scandal in the romance world. "There IS a reason all romance novels read alike," trumpets the Associated Press. The Washington Post: "Heaving bosoms and throbbing loins are all very well, but if you really want to make a romance writer breathe heavily, try pinching her prose." And from Newsweek: "Plagiarism? How can you tell when all this stuff sounds the same anyway?" I read on. Janet Dailey, the one-time queen of the romance novel, has admitted stealing words and ideas from bestselling writer Nora Roberts, and now blames the whole thing on a personality disorder caused by the deaths or illnesses of several family members, including her dog.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1997/10/07/romance_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1997/10/07/romance_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

