<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Plagiarism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/plagiarism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 02:31:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Alleged Patton Oswalt plagiarist takes break from Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/alleged_patton_oswalt_plagiarist_takes_break_from_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/alleged_patton_oswalt_plagiarist_takes_break_from_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prodigalsam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patton Oswalt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sammy rhodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13321071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sammy Rhodes is stepping away from "Twitter for a season, for the sake of my family, ministry, &#038; own soul…"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comics will be relieved to hear that Sammy Rhodes, a University of South Carolina campus minister who has became <a href="http://borrowingsam.tumblr.com/">Internet famous</a> for <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/how_one_twitter_user_got_famous_by_allegedly_stealing_comedians_tweets/">lifting tweets from famous comedians</a>, is taking a break from Twitter.</p><p>In a recent interview with Salon, Rhodes <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/minister_accused_of_ripping_off_patton_oswalts_tweets_explains_himself/">defended himself</a> against the charges from Patton Oswalt, Gawker's Jeb Lund and many others, saying that he plans to "be a lot more careful to make sure my tweets are clearly my own."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/alleged_patton_oswalt_plagiarist_takes_break_from_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/alleged_patton_oswalt_plagiarist_takes_break_from_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wikipedia editors accuse professor of editing site with plagiarized text</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/wikipedia_editors_accuse_professor_of_administering_plagiarism_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/wikipedia_editors_accuse_professor_of_administering_plagiarism_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the daily dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wikipedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Toronto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13261589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Up to 1700 students were tasked with improving two Wikipedia articles. An estimated 85 percent copied their edits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailydot.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/dailydot_square-e1364842032669.png" alt="The Daily Dot" align="left" /></a> Wikipedia editors are furious after a college professor assigned his students to edit the encyclopedia, riddling it with errors and alleged <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Copyright_violations">plagiarism</a>.</p><p>Professor Steve Joordens of the University of Toronto assigned more than 1,700 students the task of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Colin/Introduction_to_Psychology,_2013">editing and improving two different Wikipedia articles</a> on topics pertaining to the lectures he'd given.</p><p>The students dug in and amended the articles, but something fishy caught a site editor’s attention: Of the 1,700 students who'd been handed the assignment, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&amp;oldid=548410059#Class_of_1700_students_fill_Wikipedia_with_plagiarism._Response_from_prof_is_accusation_of_illegal_behaviour_by_editors">an estimated 85 percent</a> had plagiarized their edits.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/wikipedia_editors_accuse_professor_of_administering_plagiarism_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/wikipedia_editors_accuse_professor_of_administering_plagiarism_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harvard administration spied on staff emails</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/harvard_administration_spied_on_staff_emails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/harvard_administration_spied_on_staff_emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13225422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Faculty angered by privacy breach after cheating scandal leaks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following leaks to the media on student cheating scandal at Harvard, the university administration spied on staff emails in an attempt to locate the source of the leak. Faculty members have reacted with fury since this privacy invasion was revealed this weekend.</p><p>Via the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/11/us/harvard-e-mail-search-stuns-faculty-members.html?hp&amp;_r=1&amp;">New York Times:</a></p><blockquote><p>Last fall, the administrators searched the e-mails of 16 resident deans, trying to determine who had leaked an internal memo about how the deans should advise students who stood accused of cheating. But most of those deans were not told that their accounts had been searched until the past few days, after <a title="Globe article breaking the story" href="http://www.boston.com/metrodesk/2013/03/09/harvard-university-administrators-secretly-searched-deans-email-accounts-hunting-for-media-leak/d5lYY8vXLyZQYWtTNGxWkL/story.html">The Boston Globe</a>, which first reported the searches, began to inquire about them.</p> <p>Rather than the searches being kept secret from the resident deans, “they should’ve been asked openly,” said Richard Thomas, a professor of classics. “This is not a good outcome"... <a title="Harry Lewis’ blog" href="http://harry-lewis.blogspot.com/">On his blog</a>, which is closely followed by many people at Harvard, Dr. Lewis called the administration’s handling of the search “dishonorable,” and, like some of his colleagues, said the episode would prompt him to do less of his communication through his Harvard e-mail account, and more through a private account.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/harvard_administration_spied_on_staff_emails/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/harvard_administration_spied_on_staff_emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Juan Williams pre-scandal: &#8220;I think standards are falling down&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/juan_williams_pre_scandal_i_think_standards_are_falling_down/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/juan_williams_pre_scandal_i_think_standards_are_falling_down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Juan Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13222961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fox News pundit embroiled in a plagiarism scandal once had plenty of contempt for the decline of journalism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Juan Williams, the Fox News pundit who -- in a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/juan_williams_column_cribs_from_think_tank_report/">story broken by Salon</a>'s Alex Seitz-Wald -- <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/juan_williams_column_cribs_from_think_tank_report/">admitted</a> that parts of his <a href="http://thehill.com/opinion/columnists/juan-williams/283589-opinion-dispensing-with-a-new-dagger-against-immigration-reform">column</a> on immigration last month were taken word-for-word from a <a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/immigration/news/2013/02/08/52377/immigrants-are-makers-not-takers/">Center for American Progress report,</a> previously bemoaned the collapse of journalistic ethics when other outlets were embroiled in scandal.</p><p>Williams blamed his researcher for this <a href="http://cached.newslookup.com/cached.php?siteid=2090&amp;id=1448783&amp;t=1361188959">apparent plagiarism.</a> He <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/juan_williams_column_cribs_from_think_tank_report/">told</a> Salon that he did not know that the "young man" did not summarize the report himself, and instead borrowed the language directly from CAP. According to that reasoning, the disputed sections of his column -- which were rewritten after CAP pointed out the similarities to D.C. newspaper The Hill -- must have simply been cut-and-pasted by Williams from his researcher and into the column that appeared under the highly paid commentator's name.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/juan_williams_pre_scandal_i_think_standards_are_falling_down/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/juan_williams_pre_scandal_i_think_standards_are_falling_down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did &#8220;Glee&#8221; rip off Jonathan Coulton&#8217;s cover of &#8220;Baby Got Back&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/did_glee_rip_off_jonathan_coultons_cover_of_baby_got_back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/did_glee_rip_off_jonathan_coultons_cover_of_baby_got_back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jonathan coulton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baby got back]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13175656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The musician tweets that the versions are uncannily similar]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Musician Jonathan Coulton is claiming that Fox's hit show "Glee" plagiarized a cover he performed of the 1992  Sir-Mix-a-Lot single "Baby Got Back." Via Twitter, Coulton wrote:</p><p>[embedtweet id="292304798999539712"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="292311288799981568"]</p><p>The "Glee" track, from Season 4, below:<br /> <iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/Yww4BLjReEk" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>Indeed, the song bears an uncanny resemblance to Coulton's 2005 <a href="http://www.jonathancoulton.com/2005/10/14/thing-a-week-5-baby-got-back/">release</a>, posted on YouTube via user Enzemo:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/MCWaN_Tc5wo" frameborder="0" width="420" height="315"></iframe></p><p>Salon has reached out to Fox via email and is waiting to hear back.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/did_glee_rip_off_jonathan_coultons_cover_of_baby_got_back/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/did_glee_rip_off_jonathan_coultons_cover_of_baby_got_back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Beyoncé a plagiarist?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/is_beyonce_a_plagiarist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/is_beyonce_a_plagiarist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Destiny's child]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13168136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She claims she wrote Destiny's Child's songs. This isn't her first time stealing credit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the new GQ, pegged to Beyoncé's forthcoming album, Super Bowl performance, and the nonstop publicity blitz that is her life, <a href="http://www.gq.com/women/photos/201301/beyonce-cover-story-interview-gq-february-2013?currentPage=1">the new mom opened up about her omnipotence</a> ("I'm more powerful than my mind can even digest and understand"). She says her will to power started early, when she was in the off-and-on girl group Destiny's Child: "You know, when I was writing the Destiny's Child songs, it was a big thing to be that young and taking control. And the label at the time didn't know that we were going to be that successful, so they gave us all control."</p><p>When Beyoncé "was writing" Destiny's Child songs, she did so with help: There is not a single song on any of the group's four albums that Beyoncé wrote herself. She, more and more as the group's run went on, was involved in writing, but a more typical Destiny's Child song was their single "Lose My Breath," with seven credited writers. On the group's final album, several songs were credited to all three singers in the group. And songwriting credits are often arbitrary -- Beyoncé was disqualified before three much less notable writers from <a href="http://goldderby.latimes.com/awards_goldderby/2007/01/beyonce_disqual.html">an Academy Award nomination for the "Dreamgirls" song "Listen,"</a> which she co-wrote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/is_beyonce_a_plagiarist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/is_beyonce_a_plagiarist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The worst publisher of all time</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/the_worst_publisher_of_all_time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/the_worst_publisher_of_all_time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alexander pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13166288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you think writers and publishers today are dodgy, get a load of the crooks and scoundrels of 18th-century London]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plagiarism, lying, fabricating quotes, repurposing old work as new, assuming false identities to promote themselves and tear down their rivals — is there no end to the mischief and malfeasance today's authors get up to? Many would call modern-day publishers even worse, peddlers of thinly veiled smut and sensationalistic rubbish, derivative rip-offs and trashy celebrity bios. Are publishers not intent on (and ingenious at) ripping off any ink-stained wretch unfortunate enough to come under their thrall? Literary culture as we know it must surely be staggering into its final, degraded stage — am I right?</p><p>Not so fast. I recently came into possession of a reprint of an old pamphlet, titled "An Author to be Lett," written by the English poet Richard Savage in 1729; its contents serve as a reminder that it was ever thus. The work purports to be a prospectus discovered in a "leathern case, which had once been red, but was grown black with Grease" that had been "accidentally drop'd near the Mews Gate," a London neighborhood known for its concentration of booksellers. The document's alleged author, one Iscariot Hackney, was meant to stand for the entire scribal community known as Grub Street, a conglomeration of down-at-heel, mercenary writers serving the thriving periodical press as well as a booming book trade. A "hackney" was a horse (eventually a cab) that could be hired by the hour, and in time writers operating on the same principle would become commonly known as hacks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/the_worst_publisher_of_all_time/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/10/the_worst_publisher_of_all_time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plagiarists&#8217; addictive, stressful world</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/20/plagiarists_addictive_stressful_world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/20/plagiarists_addictive_stressful_world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2012 22:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fareed Zakaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonah Lehrer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12987826</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fareed Zakaria says he just confused his notes. When writers are accused of plagiarism, the excuses sound familiar]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Fareed Zakaria says he just confused his notes. When writers are accused of plagiarism, the excuses sound familiar]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/20/plagiarists_addictive_stressful_world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s worst historians</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/19/americas_worst_historians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/19/americas_worst_historians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fareed Zakaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12985362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fareed Zakaria's plagiarism scandal shows the danger of journalists trying to write history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thomas Jefferson wasn’t trying to pull the wool over anyone’s eyes when he directly borrowed John Locke’s ideas and language to declare the principle of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” But, by definition, we could call what he did plagiarism.</p><p>The major moral lesson to be taken from the Fareed Zakaria scandal is not what the media focused on this past week. Yes, he lifted material concerning the long, mostly unknown history of gun control, and he did so transparently. Even if he hadn’t been obliged to come up with an article for Time on a short deadline, he would still have taken more or less the same steps, and for a reason that, on the surface, makes perfect sense: The history he needed to tap into was too involved for someone trained as a journalist to investigate in depth.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/14/cut_paste_plagiarize/" target="_blank"> Michael Barthel’s probing piece in Salon</a> about transparency and credibility in the Internet age aims at the heart of the problem. But for professional historians, there’s more to it than the cut-and-paste freedom that the Web invites. Plagiarism is both a broader and touchier issue than most people imagine it to be – outright “copying.” It is ultimately a question of originality.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/19/americas_worst_historians/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/19/americas_worst_historians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cut, paste, plagiarize</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/14/cut_paste_plagiarize/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/14/cut_paste_plagiarize/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fareed Zakaria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12980983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everything on the Internet is stolen. So why does the Web delight so much in nailing a plagiarist in the MSM?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Major media organizations had faith in Fareed Zakaria. CNN gave him 60 minutes each week --  several million dollars' worth of time -- to say whatever the hell he wanted, more or less. Time gave him a column, too, the one in which (as <a href="http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2012/08/10/talk-about-concealed-carry-fareed-zakaria-plagiarized-paragraph-history-">reported by</a> conservative media blog NewsBusters) he reprinted barely changed paragraphs from Jill Lepore's New Yorker article on gun control, and for which offense <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/08/10/time-magazine-to-examine-plagiarism-accusation-against-zakaria/">he has now been suspended</a> from both perches.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/14/cut_paste_plagiarize/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/14/cut_paste_plagiarize/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to rate a writer&#8217;s deceit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/28/how_to_rate_a_writers_deceipt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/28/how_to_rate_a_writers_deceipt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 11:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blair-o-meter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonah Lehrer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Yorker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jayson Blair]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12946600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Jonah Lehrer to President Obama, writers keep getting accused of treachery. Here's how to tell when it's real]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Tuesday,<a href="http://jimromenesko.com/2012/06/19/jonah-lehrers-newyorker-com-smart-people-post-look-familiar/"> in a post</a> on his eponymous media-news site, Jim Romenesko broke the news that best-selling author Jonah Lehrer had reused, almost word for word, the lead from an<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203633104576625071820638808.html?mod=googlenews_wsj"> Oct. 15, 2011, Op-Ed in the Wall Street Journal</a> in a June 12 <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/frontal-cortex/2012/06/daniel-kahneman-bias-studies.html#ixzz1yBK3LldL">blog post</a> for the New Yorker, where he’d recently been hired as a staff writer.  Within hours,<a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/06/jonah-lehrer-new-yorker-writer-plagiarizes-himself.html"> other writers</a><a href="http://www.jacobsilverman.com/day/2012/06/19/"> turned up evidence</a> that Lehrer’s journalistic self-abuse wasn’t limited to a single recycled passage.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/06/28/how_to_rate_a_writers_deceipt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/06/28/how_to_rate_a_writers_deceipt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Washington Times plagiarist&#8217;s self-declared vindication</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/a_washington_times_plagiarists_self_declared_vindication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/a_washington_times_plagiarists_self_declared_vindication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington, D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12929653</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arnaud de Borchgrave wants you to know that his very important friends don't think he did anything wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arnaud de Borchgrave, the ridiculously named eminent former foreign correspondent and editor, has gotten into a spot of trouble recently for plagiarism. De Borchgrave's columns for the Washington Times and the UPI wire service routinely and brazenly borrow passages from a variety of sources, as reported by <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/post/washington-times-columnist-originality-deficit/2012/05/16/gIQAH6gOUU_blog.html#pagebreak">Erik Wemple in the Washington Post</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/singleton/">Mariah Blake here at Salon.</a> The Times management knew there was a problem -- Blake's story quotes some very egregious examples of copy-and-paste abuse -- but after suspending his column for a few months, he was back at work by late March. Once other news outlets reported his plagiarism, de Borchgrave <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/post/arnaud-de-borchgrave-takes-leave-from-washington-times/2012/05/22/gIQAZdeihU_blog.html">took a "leave of absence"</a> from the paper.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/a_washington_times_plagiarists_self_declared_vindication/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/30/a_washington_times_plagiarists_self_declared_vindication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The National Review&#8217;s fake plagiarism scoop</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/the_national_reviews_fishy_plagiarism_scoop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/the_national_reviews_fishy_plagiarism_scoop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12923198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated: After falsely accusing Elizabeth Warren of plagiarism, the conservative magazine apologizes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Review says Elizabeth Warren is guilty of the gravest crime a writer can commit: Plagiarism. <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/300502/plagiarism-2006-book-co-authored-elizabeth-warren-katrina-trinko#">Katrina Trinko compares passages</a> from "All Your Worth: The Ultimate Money Lifetime Plan," Warren's book with her daughter, Amelia Warren Tyagi, with passages from "Getting on the Money Track," a book by Rob Black. The passages line up perfectly. The wording and even the punctuation are identical. It's plagiarism all right. Except it looks very much like Warren is actually the <em>victim.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/the_national_reviews_fishy_plagiarism_scoop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/the_national_reviews_fishy_plagiarism_scoop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coverup at Washington Times</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 23:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Editors knew there was an apparent plagiarist on staff but let him keep writing. An exclusive look inside the paper]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During his long career, Arnaud de Borchgrave, a one-time Newsweek correspondent and editor, has earned his share of laurels. Fellow journalist Theodore H. White has called him one of “America's great foreign correspondents.” “In a job that requires bluff and bravado, he has outrun the best of them," Esquire gushed in a lengthy profile, which is quoted in de Borchgrave’s official bio. Along the way, he has also racked up some fancy titles, including director of the transnational threats project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.</p><p>These days, though, de Borchgrave is involved in some less praiseworthy pursuits. Alongside his other activities, the veteran newsman is a columnist for the Washington Times, the influential conservative broadsheet, where he once served as editor in chief. And in a handful of columns over the last year he has lifted passages verbatim, or nearly verbatim, from the Internet and other sources, without attribution — a fact the Washington Times' leadership tried to sweep under the rug, according to insiders at the paper.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/coverup_at_washington_times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salon debate: What is plagiarism?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/salon_debate_what_is_plagiarism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/salon_debate_what_is_plagiarism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10353461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allegations of plagiarism and copyright abuse have rocked the art world. Our panel debates where fair use ends]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last weeks of 2011 were <a href="http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-11-09/news/30379911_1_sloppy-firsts-literary-novels-publisher">littered</a> <a href="http://www.poynter.org/latest-news/mediawire/155677/columbus-dispatch-editorial-cartoonist-resigns-after-plagiarism-accusations/">with</a> <a href="http://artsbeat.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/10/beyonce-accused-of-plagiarism-over-video/">debates</a> <a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/galleycat/st-martins-press-defends-lenore-hart-on-plagiarism-charges_b43610">over</a> the originality of high-profile published work from spy novels to political cartoons -- and the supposed failure of prominent artists and creators to cite their source material. In the coming year, we're likely to see more pitched battles related to plagiarism and copyright infringements -- not least the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/01/arts/design/richard-prince-lawsuit-focuses-on-limits-of-appropriation.html?seid=auto&amp;smid=tw-nytimes&amp;pagewanted=all">much-buzzed-about appeal of artist Richard Prince</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/salon_debate_what_is_plagiarism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/salon_debate_what_is_plagiarism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A plagiarist&#8217;s lame excuse: Addiction made me do it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/a_plagiarists_lame_excuse_addiction_made_me_do_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/a_plagiarists_lame_excuse_addiction_made_me_do_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Rowan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10275961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Disgraced thriller writer Quentin Rowan borrows from 12-step rhetoric in an unconvincing and insincere explanation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quentin Rowan had the briefest run ever as an acclaimed thriller writer. "Assassin of Secrets" was published this fall by Little, Brown under the pen name Q.R. Markham. But it was quickly discovered that the author's name wasn't the only unreal thing about him. "Assassin of Secrets" -- a <a href="http://www.publishersweekly.com/978-316-17646-0%20">"quirky, entertaining spy thriller"</a> -- cut and pasted whole chunks of books by spy masters Charles McCarry, Robert Ludlum, John Gardner and Adam Hall.</p><p>Little, Brown recalled and pulped the book, issuing the mortified admission that they had "published a book that we can no longer stand behind." Rowan's nerviest steals, laid out in exhausting detail on <a href="http://www.edrants.com/q-r-markham-plagiarist/">Reluctant Habits,</a> suggest he was unaware of the existence of Google. <em>Of course</em> he was going to be found out. So why did he do it?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/a_plagiarists_lame_excuse_addiction_made_me_do_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/01/a_plagiarists_lame_excuse_addiction_made_me_do_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Johann Hari suddenly in much more trouble</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/johann_hari/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/johann_hari/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/27/johann_hari</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The liberal UK journalist, accused of plagiarism, is now said to have invented a key part of an award-winning story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back when Johann Hari was <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/06/28/hari_plagiarism">just accused of plagiarism,</a> the scandal seemed survivable for the British celebrity lefty journalist. Hari was accused, basically, of regularly inserting quotations from outside sources into his "interviews" without citation. Which you're not supposed to do, though the "rules," in the U.K. newspaper world, are a bit lax. Now it looks suddenly a lot worse.</p><p><a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100098789/johann-hari-in-africa-the-crucial-emails/">The Telegraph accuses Hari</a> of inventing an atrocity in the story that won him the Orwell Prize. Hari <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/inside-frances-secret-war-396062.html">took a trip to the Central African Republic in 2007,</a> where he documented a covert French war being waged in support of a brutal dictator.</p><p>One of the most shocking claims: French soldiers told Hari that while serving in Rwanda, they were ordered not to help children who came to them holding their parents' severed heads. <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/damianthompson/100098789/johann-hari-in-africa-the-crucial-emails/">But Hari's translator said no one ever told Hari this.</a> Here's a section from an email she wrote to Hari in 2007:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/johann_hari/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/27/johann_hari/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Bay plagiarizes Michael Bay for &#8220;Transformers 3&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Dark of the Moon's" dark secret: Shots from "The Island" appear in summer blockbuster]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most famous directors have a signature style that lets you know you are watching one of their films: David Lynch will give you red curtains and flickering matches, Scorsese will have "Gimmie Shelter" slipped somewhere in between the violent acts of mob crime, and Steven Spielberg ... well, Steven Spielberg <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2011/06/11/what_super_8_took_from_steven_spielberg/index.html">has a lot of recurring motifs</a>. But at what point does a cinematic thumbprint turn into lazy self-plagiarism?</p><p>The answer to this theoretical film query has been answered by none other than Michael Bay, whose auteur work can be boiled down to "big things blowing up or hitting other big things." But even with that not-too-original concept, Bay has gotten sloppy: allegedly taking direct shots from his 2005 flop "The Island" and putting them in "Transformers 3: Dark of the Moon."</p><p>Last week, a viral-video pirate named Jermain Odreman spent a considerable amount of time watching Bay's movies in slow-motion <a href="http://entertainment.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/07/05/michael-bay-recycles-footage-from-2005-film-for-transformers/">in order to catch almost identical sequences from both films</a>. The footage is unquestionably similar, down to the type of car that flips over, the angle of the smoke from the explosion, and the damage done by flying shrapnel.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/michael_bay_transformers_3_the_island/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Johann Hari in UK plagiarism row</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/hari_plagiarism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/hari_plagiarism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/28/hari_plagiarism</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lefty hack's cut-and-paste chats spark Twitter furor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big UK press scandal, everyone! Johann Hari, a prize-winning superstar lefty columnist for the Independent, has been caught engaging in a bit of <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jun/28/johann-hari-twitter-plagiarism">light plagiarism.</a> Hari apparently routinely takes old quotes and writings from interview subjects and pastes them into his interviews, without attribution. He was caught by <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jun/28/johann-hari-twitter-plagiarism">a cadre of anonymous ultra-leftist bloggers known as the Deterritorial Support Grouppppp</a>, and, after a bit of a Twitter firestorm, called out in the rival Telegraph by <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tobyyoung/100094268/busted-johann-hari-is-guilty-of-shoddy-journalism/">Toby Young,</a> a British media person best known here for his failed stint as a "Top Chef" judge.</p><p>This quote-recycling (or inventing) is apparently a not-uncommon practice, Young says, though it's rare among the famous and successful:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/hari_plagiarism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/hari_plagiarism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marc Maron explains his podcasting infamy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/marc_maron_wtf_interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/marc_maron_wtf_interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plagiarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/07/marc_maron_wtf_interview</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The host of the hit Internet series "WTF" talks about comedy, cantaloupes -- and his notorious celebrity interviews]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance, Marc Maron doesn't particularly strike me as the type of comedic personality who would thrive on the Internet. He's more old-school, often called "<a href="http://www.nerve.com/entertainment/2010/10/01/five-comedy-albums-that-changed-my-life">a comedian's comedian</a>," like those guys telling each other backstage jokes in "The Aristocrats." He's not had the same mainstream success as a lot of contemporaries, and can be confrontational (to say the least) with the guests that he hosts on his biweekly podcasts, "<a href="http://www.wtfpod.com">WTF With Marc Maron</a>," out of his garage in Los Angeles.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/marc_maron_wtf_interview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/marc_maron_wtf_interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
