<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Plane Crashes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/plane_crashes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>10 years and counting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/12/10_years_and_counting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/12/10_years_and_counting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Nov 2011 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10197635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been a decade since Flight 587 crashed over Queens, N.Y. -- a milestone worth noting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always wondered if I'd get around to writing this little column. The superstitious part of me was worried about posting it even a day early, in fear that something awful might happen. But here we are and here it is:</p><p>Today, Nov. 12, 2011, marks the 10th anniversary of the crash of American Airlines Flight 587 near Kennedy Airport. <a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2004/11/05/askthepilot110/">Flight 587</a>, an Airbus A300 bound for Santo Domingo, went down in the Belle Harbor section of Queens moments after takeoff from JFK airport killing 265 people. The first officer had overreacted to <a href="http://www.salon.com/tech/col/smith/2006/11/10/askthepilot208/">wake turbulence</a> produced by a Japan Airlines 747 ahead. This, combined with a peculiarity in the sensitivity of the plane's rudder control system, ripped off the tail and sent the plane plummeting into a residential neighborhood.</p><p>I was flying back from Europe that afternoon, and my plane was one of the first to land after JFK reopened to traffic. Smoke was still rising from the crash scene. Only a few miles beyond the gray plume I could see the vacant chunk of sky that had been occupied by the World Trade Center.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/12/10_years_and_counting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/12/10_years_and_counting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there a remotely piloted jetliner in the foreseeable future?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/myths_of_automation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/myths_of_automation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot//2011/08/18/myths_of_automation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No way. But some are still skeptical, despite my best efforts. Here's one last shot at convincing you holdouts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt you're tired of listening to me lecture about myths of autopilots and automation, and how the idea of remote-control airliners is a lot more far-fetched than certain researchers and academics make it out to be. Just a few loose ends, I promise ...&#160;</p><p>The most effective, and probably the most fun way of making my point, I think, would be through a demonstration in a flight simulator. Cost and practicality make that pretty much impossible, however, and so you're stuck with me writing about it.</p><p>And in doing so, either I'm a lousy wordsmith or my audience is a lot more stubborn than is healthy or reasonable. Because as hard as I try, I just can't put the skeptics out of their misery.</p><p>"Well, you are an airline pilot," emailed one reader, whose doubt was so palpable I could feel it oozing through the screen. "So I suppose we should take your word for it as to how planes are flown."</p><p>No, really. Take my word for it.</p><p>Most readers aren't as cynical (or insufferable), and are willing to trust me -- though not always fully.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/myths_of_automation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/myths_of_automation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is a shorter runway more dangerous?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/caribbean_airlines_accident_guyana/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/caribbean_airlines_accident_guyana/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot//2011/08/02/caribbean_airlines_accident_guyana</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overrun incidents, like the one in Guyana last weekend, are on the rise. Should we be alarmed?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here it is, the turn of another month. It dawns on me -- too late -- that I let the first of July go by without mentioning that it was the 25th anniversary of my near-death experience over Nantucket Sound. This was the only close call I've ever had in an airplane, and it happened in a rented Piper Warrior when I was a 20-year-old private pilot hoping to impress a gothed-out, 17-year-old fashion model named Dorothy Meyer. The tale of that near-miss is my all-time favorite flying story, and every year I make a point of running a link. <a href="http://www.askthepilot.com/essays-and-stories/into-the-sea-love-death-and-other-near-misses/">Here it is again</a>, better late than never.</p><p>Onward to more timely things ...</p><p>Later in the week I'll be getting to the Air France 447 findings. In particular, I'll be looking at the media's garbled interpretation of them. European investigators released their report on July 29, and I've received a blizzard of emails from a confused public. Here's some advice for the time being: Ignore pretty much everything you see or read about this. What they're telling you about the report isn't what the report actually says.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/caribbean_airlines_accident_guyana/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/03/caribbean_airlines_accident_guyana/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Bay life lessons: Stress management</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/michael_bay_guide_stress_management/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/michael_bay_guide_stress_management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transformers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/07/13/michael_bay_guide_stress_management</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What the films of the "Transformers" auteur can teach you about dealing with pressure and everyday hassles]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be some dispute over the quality of Michael Bay's directorial skills, but no one can deny that the man has a certain panache. With films about killer robots, killer comets and Peal Harbor, Bay's oeuvre may be full of violence, but they're also full of learning moments for the neurotically inclined.</p><p>Better than Tony Robbins or a self-help book, Michael Bay's movies are an advanced class on dealing with life when it hands you lemons. <em>Lemons that are actually grenades and you have two minutes to deactivate before the whole country goes ka-BLAM</em>!</p><p>Welcome to Michael Bay's stress management guide. Now take a deep breath, and go to your calm place...</p><p>
    <strong>Lesson 1: Keep your mantras simple</strong>
  </p><p>Everybody's had those days when life seems determined to weigh you down. While you might be inclined to give up and throw a pity party complete with a "Teen Moms" marathon and a bucket of ice cream, it's good to remember those wise words of Yoda: "Do or do not. There is no try." Though if you don't like taking advice from a short green guy, how about Sean Connery, who paraphrases the famous "Star Wars" line to a whiny Nicholas Cage in "The Rock."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/michael_bay_guide_stress_management/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/13/michael_bay_guide_stress_management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will we ever know what caused the crash?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/air_france_black_box/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/air_france_black_box/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot//2011/05/31/air_france_black_box</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite our desire for easy answers from Air France Flight 447's black boxes, we're likely to be disappointed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At long last the black boxes from Air France 447 are giving up their secrets.</p><p>Flight 447 was the Airbus A330 that went down in the Atlantic on a flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris two years ago, killing everybody on board. The data and voice recorders were recovered earlier this month, and late last week investigators released their preliminary findings. The key word being "preliminary." There is much we don't yet know.</p><p>This hasn't stopped the media, however, from taking the ball and running. Coverage of the findings has been thus far abysmal, bursting with caricature and gross oversimplification of what was a complicated incident. We're reading, among other nonsense, that the jetliner "literally fell from the sky."</p><p>Which it did not.</p><p>Much is being made, too, about the fact that Flight 447's captain was not on the flight deck when things began unwinding. "Captain not in the cockpit," sang one headline. An especially ridiculous NPR headline (later amended), read, "Report: Air France Pilot Resting as Plane Plunged." Another yelped incredulously at how the "copilot was at the controls."</p><p>Good grief, a copilot at the controls!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/air_france_black_box/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/air_france_black_box/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pilots sentenced after deadly crash</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/us_pilots_sentenced_in_brazil/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/us_pilots_sentenced_in_brazil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot//2011/05/24/us_pilots_sentenced_in_brazil</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But why were two planes set on a collision course to begin with? Brazil's air traffic control system comes up short]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Brazil last week, a judge handed down 52-month jail sentences to Joe Lepore and Jan Paladino, the two U.S. pilots of a Legacy executive jet that collided mid-flight with a Gol Airlines 737 over Brazil five years ago. The Brazilian-built Legacy survived the crash, limping to an emergency landing at a military base. The 737 plummeted into the Amazon jungle killing all 154 people on board. Brazil says the pilots may substitute community service for actual time in prison, but also ruled that the men's Federal Aviation Administration pilot certificates be revoked.</p><p>Brazilian authorities maintain that Lepore and Paladino had -- inadvertently or otherwise -- switched off their jet's transponder, in turn rendering an anti-collision alarm, called TCAS, inoperative as well. The two pilots deny this, though pilots of the commercial variant of the Legacy have noted that the location of transponder controls makes accidental shut-offs relatively easy. This could explain why neither crew received a TCAS warning as the planes closed in on each other.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/us_pilots_sentenced_in_brazil/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/24/us_pilots_sentenced_in_brazil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solving an aviation mystery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/06/air_france_black_box_found/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/06/air_france_black_box_found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot//2011/05/06/air_france_black_box_found</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The doomed Air France flight's second black box has been found. Will we get the simple answers we're looking for?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, a search team dredged up the second of the black boxes from the wreckage of Air France Flight 447 -- the Airbus A330 that crashed into the Atlantic nearly two years ago during a flight from Rio de Janeiro to Paris, killing 228 people. With the voice and data recorders finally on hand -- provided that critical data remains intact after spending 23 months beneath two miles of seawater -- investigators are on the verge of solving one of modern aviation's most perplexing disasters.</p><p>What makes this such a tough and perhaps unsatisfying story, however, is that the "cause" of the accident won't be anything simple. People want an easy, all-in-one explanation: Turbulence crashed the plane. A sensor malfunction crashed the plane. The pilots "lost control." But it won't be any of those things. Or, more correctly, it's liable to be all of them, laced together in a cascade of events that was as complicated as it was unlikely. The technical aspects alone are something we could talk about all day. The air data sensors on an Airbus A330 are not the same as those on a Cessna.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/06/air_france_black_box_found/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/06/air_france_black_box_found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Air travel is getting safer all the time</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/airline_safety_record/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/airline_safety_record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot//2011/03/01/airline_safety_record</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let's celebrate good news, for a change: 2010's accident rate was the lowest in aviation history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I am prone to pointing out, air travel has never been safer than it is right now. I tend to mention this in passing, anecdotally. But now I have some data to back me up: According to a report just released by the International Air Transport Association, the accident rate in 2010 was the lowest in aviation history.</p><p>Worldwide last year, approximately 2.4 billion people flew safely on 36.8 million flights. There was one accident for every 1.6 million flights. That's a 42 percent improvement compared to what it was 10 years ago.</p><p>Mind you, even "accident" doesn't mean a fatality. IATA is talking about so-called hull losses -- an incident in which the aircraft is substantially damaged and is not subsequently repaired. Globally, among what we'd consider <em>major</em> airlines in 2010, there was not a single fatality.</p><p>And, sure, this is only a single-year snapshot, but the trend over the past quarter-century has been one of consistent improvement. This is especially notable when you consider the exponential growth of air travel in places like India, China, Brazil and elsewhere in the developing world.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/airline_safety_record/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/airline_safety_record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plane crash near Los Angeles kills 3 people</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/plane_crash_near_los_angeles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/plane_crash_near_los_angeles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/22/plane_crash_near_los_angeles</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three horses are also dead after a small aircraft goes down into a corral and bursts into flames]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Investigators were trying to determine Friday what caused a small plane to crash into a horse corral and burst into flames in northern Los Angeles County, killing three people and three horses.</p><p>The single-engine Cirrus SR22 went down at about 12:10 p.m. Thursday into a horse corral behind a barn in Agua Dulce, county fire Inspector Matt Levesque said. The plane caught fire but was quickly doused, he said.</p><p>The plane had departed from Van Nuys Airport and was headed to Parker, Ariz., when it went down, said Ian Gregor, a spokesman for the Federal Aviation Administration. The crash site was about a mile west of the Agua Dulce Airpark.</p><p>Three horses in the corral were killed and a fourth was injured, Levesque said.</p><p>Neighbor Scott Strickland told KCAL-TV he was inside his house when he heard a big explosion, then ran to the crash site.</p><p>"The two horses are on fire and I just see smoke everywhere," Strickland said. "I saw somebody yell 'grab a gun.' Somebody grabbed a gun, came over and put the horse out of his misery 'cause he was just on fire, you couldn't do much after that," he said.</p><p>The skies were overcast at the time of the crash, Gregor said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/plane_crash_near_los_angeles/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/22/plane_crash_near_los_angeles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The two most abused words in air travel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/18/heroes_and_miracles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/18/heroes_and_miracles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot//2010/10/18/heroes_and_miracles</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Doing a hard job well in difficult circumstances doesn't make you a "hero," and success isn't always a "miracle"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been thinking some more about miracles and heroics. (That's disappointing news to some of you, I know, but bear with me a moment and we'll finally put this topic to bed.)</p><p>As the media would have it, miracles and heroes are a dime a dozen these days, which doesn't seem right. Indeed, not only have these terms become meaningless through repetition, but we've changed their very definitions to feed an endless societal feel-good fix.</p><p>Miracles first: A miracle isn't what's expected to happen, it's what's expected <em>not</em> to happen. As a pilot, when I watch an airplane coming in with a stuck landing gear, I fully expect a casualty-free, if perhaps photogenic, finish to the affair. Moreover I am not surprised when, even in more serious incidents, a large number of passengers -- all of them, perhaps -- emerge unscathed.</p><p>I love a happy ending as much as the next guy, but such outcomes are a testament not to the guiding hand (a random and unfair guiding hand as it might be at times) of an unseen deity, but to the progress of air safety -- to ever-improving crew training, engineering and survivability standards. People make it out because they're <em>supposed to,</em> and we have ourselves, not our gods, to thank for that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/18/heroes_and_miracles/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/18/heroes_and_miracles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pilot makes emergency landing on South Carolina highway</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/05/emergency_landing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/05/emergency_landing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/10/05/emergency_landing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A small plane bound for Georgia is forced to come down several hundred feet from the runway. Only minor injuries]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Authorities say the pilot of a small plane made an emergency landing on a highway west of South Carolina's capital city after being forced to abort a flight to Georgia.</p><p>Lexington County Sheriff's spokesman Maj. John Allard told reporters the Cessna 182 Skylane had left Columbia Metropolitan Airport for Macon, Ga., on Tuesday afternoon when the pilot had to land several hundred feet away from the runway.</p><p>The plane came down on Highway 302, but authorities had no immediate details about the emergency landing.</p><p>Airport spokeswoman Lynne Douglas says the pilot was treated for minor injuries at the scene. Another person on board was not injured.</p><p>State and federal authorities are investigating.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/05/emergency_landing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/05/emergency_landing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Near catastrophe &#8212; or minor event?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/delta_connection_emergency_landing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/delta_connection_emergency_landing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot//2010/09/29/delta_connection_emergency_landing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again, the press  grossly overstates an incident's danger. Sorry, there was no "hero pilot"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Sunday night, a regional jet carrying 64 passengers and crew made an emergency landing at JFK Airport after its right main landing gear became stuck in the retracted position.</p><p>The plane circled for a while as the crew attempted to troubleshoot the malfunction. Failing to get the errant gear deployed, they opted for a landing on Kennedy's Runway 31L. The flight originally had been bound for White Plains, N.Y., but JFK's so-called "bay runway" is one of the longest in the country, and together with the airport's advanced emergency response team, this was the better and safer option.</p><p>The Canadian-built CRJ-900 touched down on its left-side gear, decelerated, and eventually the unsupported right wing made contact with the pavement. Moments later the jet came safely to a stop and was evacuated. There was no fire, no major damage, no injuries.&#160;</p><p>The press and TV took it from there, spinning this minor event into a near-catastrophe that never was. The biggest mistakes and distortions were the usual and predictable ones: They got the airline wrong, they grossly overstated the danger, and once again we are led to think that jetliners are flying around with only one qualified person -- "the pilot" -- at the controls.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/delta_connection_emergency_landing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/delta_connection_emergency_landing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A near-death experience goes viral</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/28/delta_flight_4951_video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/28/delta_flight_4951_video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/09/28/delta_flight_4951_video</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When their plane seemed doomed, two men on Flight 4951 whipped out their video phones. What were they thinking?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You're a passenger on a small commercial jet heading from Atlanta to Westchester, N.Y. You look out the window and see, surprisingly, the lights of JFK International. And then a flight attendant says, "Attention, passengers: We've got some serious business here." The crew informs you that your plane's landing gear is not coming down, and you are about to crash. Your pilot tells you to <a href="http://www.aolnews.com/nation/article/thankful-passengers-hail-our-capt-sully/19649713">"prepare for the worst."</a> You do as instructed and put your head down, bracing for impact. You smell smoke. These may wind up being your last moments of life. And you take out your phone and record it all.</p><p>Fortunately, Saturday night's Delta Flight 4951 did not end in tragedy. In a happy resolution reminiscent of last year's <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28678669/">"miracle on the Hudson,"</a> Capt. Jack Conroyd shepherded his crew and 60 passengers onto the runway with a few bumps and sparks but no injuries. And the story, compelling enough simply as a narrative, has gained even more attention in the ensuing days thanks to not one but two dramatic passenger videos.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/28/delta_flight_4951_video/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/28/delta_flight_4951_video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>33 survive Venezuelan plane crash</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/13/venezuela_plane_crash_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/13/venezuela_plane_crash_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/09/13/lt_venezuela_plane_crash_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Officials say 14 people were killed, 4 left missing after a Conviasa airliner went down shortly after takeoff]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A plane carrying 51 people from a Caribbean island crashed Monday in eastern Venezuela, and officials said 33 survived, while the rest were killed or missing. At least 14 people were killed and four were missing in the crash about six miles (10 kilometers) from the eastern city of Puerto Ordaz, Bolivar state Gov. Francisco Rangel Gomez told reporters.</p><p>The French-built ATR-42 from the state airline Conviasa slammed into a lot used by the state-run Sidor steel foundry, leaving its smashed fuselage among barrels and shipping containers.</p><p>The governor said 33 people survived and were being treated at hospitals.</p><p>The plane, a twin-engine turboprop, was carrying 47 passengers and four crew members, Rangel Gomez said.</p><p>He said that Conviasa Flight 2350 had taken off from Margarita Island and crashed shortly before reaching its destination, the airport of Puerto Ordaz.</p><p>It was unclear what caused the crash.</p><p>The state airline, Consorcio Venezolano de Industrias Aeronauticas y Servicios Aeros SA, began operations in 2004. It says it serves destinations in Venezuela, the Caribbean, Argentina, Iran and Syria.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/13/venezuela_plane_crash_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/13/venezuela_plane_crash_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Venezuelan plane crashes with 51 aboard</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/13/venezuela_plane_crash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/13/venezuela_plane_crash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latin America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/09/13/venezuela_plane_crash</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conviasa flight goes down shortly after takeoff. Officials say at least 21 people have survived]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A plane carrying 51 people crashed Monday in eastern Venezuela, and officials said at least 21 people survived.</p><p>The French-built ATR-42 from the state airline Conviasa crashed about 6 miles (10 kilometers) from the eastern city of Puerto Ordaz at about 10 a.m. (1430 GMT), Transportation Minister Francisco Garces told state television. He said the plane went down on the property of the state-run Sidor steel foundry.</p><p>Rescue workers were tending to injured victims, and at least 23 survivors were taken to hospitals, Bolivar state Gov. Francisco Rangel Gomez told the Venezuela-based television network Telesur.</p><p>Two of the injured died, while 21 others were being treated, hospital official Yanitza Rodriguez said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/13/venezuela_plane_crash/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/13/venezuela_plane_crash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s engineering and training, not miracles</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/23/miracles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/23/miracles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot//2010/08/23/miracles</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let's not forget that planes are designed with survivability in mind. But try telling that to CNN]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrapping up from <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot/2010/08/18/don_t_call_them_miracles/index.html">last week's piece</a> about the media's irritating and irresponsible use of the world "miracle" in describing survivable plane crashes ...</p><p>One point that I wish I had emphasized more strongly is that of the design of modern commercial planes. The latest-generation aircraft are constructed with survivability in mind, and are much safer than they used to be, thanks to things like greater fire resistance and seats that are able to withstand 16 times the force of gravity. Cabin crew training and evacuation protocols also have evolved. Together these improvements have likely saved thousands of lives over the past several years.</p><p>On the day my "miracle" piece ran, Alan Levin, over at USA Today, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/2010-08-18-miracle18_ST_N.htm?csp=usat.me">published a somewhat similar story</a>, emphasizing the engineering aspects that have made certain accidents less lethal.</p><p>His article included this quote, from FAA deputy safety chief John Hickey: "I cringe when I see these headlines that this was a miracle. We as engineers and scientists don't believe that this is a miracle. We are totally convinced that the work that we did in the 1980s has proven its value."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/23/miracles/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/23/miracles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Note to media: Time to retire the M-word</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/18/don_t_call_them_miracles/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/18/don_t_call_them_miracles/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot//2010/08/18/don_t_call_them_miracles</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are we so quick to call it a miracle when people survive crashes? What about the crew's skill?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A "miracle." That was the operative term, at least as the media saw it, after Monday's crash of a 737 on the Colombian resort island of San Andres. Only one person was killed after the jetliner skidded and broke apart while landing in stormy weather. One hundred and thirty others survived.</p><p>We witnessed an earlier miracle, or so we were told, back in May, when a 10-year-old boy was the sole survivor of an Afriqiyah Airways A330 that crashed in Tripoli, Libya.</p><p>In 2009, a young girl became the lone passenger to escape a Yemenia Airways crash in the Indian Ocean. Miraculous, yet again.</p><p>Shortly before that, of course, we had Captain Sully and his "Miracle on the Hudson."</p><p>Shall we keep going? Five years ago this month, an Air France A340 overran a runway in Toronto. Similar to Monday's Aires mishap, catastrophe was narrowly averted following a botched landing in stormy weather. The jet went careening off the end of the runway and caught fire -- but not before every one of its 309 occupants made it out alive. On CNN, host Aaron Brown gifted us with perhaps the gaudiest playing of the miracle card to date. In one broadcast, he repeated the noun at least three times in a groaning whisper of incredulity -- "a miracle; a miracle; a miracle" -- infusing the word with a spiritual oomph. Brown's next guest may as well have been a Catholic priest. The piece had everything except heavenly harp music and a choir of angels.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/18/don_t_call_them_miracles/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/18/don_t_call_them_miracles/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Survivable plane crashes are not miracles</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/16/colombia_plane_crash_steven_slater/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/16/colombia_plane_crash_steven_slater/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot//2010/08/16/colombia_plane_crash_steven_slater</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Luck is more likely at work. Plus: It's time to put the silly Steven Slater story behind us]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early on Monday morning, an Aires airlines Boeing 737 crashed on the resort island of San Andres, Colombia.</p><p>One person was killed as the plane skidded down the runway and broke into three large pieces while landing in stormy weather. One hundred and thirty passengers and crew escaped.</p><p>Predictably, that all but one person survived is being called a "miracle." We hear this word virtually every time there's a survivable accident. In fact <em>most</em> airplane crashes have survivors. Doest that mean most crashes are miraculous?</p><p>The 737 landed hard and broke apart, but did not catch fire. Luck, not some unseen guiding hand, was more likely at work.</p><p>Anyway, in this most recent case, it is far too early to know what happened, but a few things jump out at me.</p><p>First off, you can <em>probably</em> discount the various reports that lightning may have contributed to the accident.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/16/colombia_plane_crash_steven_slater/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/16/colombia_plane_crash_steven_slater/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unfortunate contextual advertising watch, Ted Stevens edition</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/10/ted_stevens_contextual_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/10/ted_stevens_contextual_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/08/10/ted_stevens_contextual_ad</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An ill-advised ad ends up on a Huffington Post story on the former Alaska Senator's plane crash]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <img class='wp-image-10019080' src='http://media.salon.com/2010/08/tedstevensad.jpg' />
  </p><p>The automatically generated advertisements on <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/08/10/ted-stevens-plane-crash_n_676805.html">the Huffington Post's story</a> on the deadly plane crash that reportedly claimed the life of former Senator Ted Stevens are all for radio controlled airplanes. Because, you know, if you're reading about this, you are probably an airplane enthusiast.</p><p>
    <img class='wp-image-10019082' src='http://media.salon.com/2010/08/stevensad.jpg' />
  </p><p>(I know no humans are directly responsible for this sort of thing, but at this point the internet advertisemement robots should be taught not to place airplane ads on plane crash stories.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/10/ted_stevens_contextual_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/10/ted_stevens_contextual_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Stevens killed in plane crash</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/10/ted_stevens_plane_crash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/10/ted_stevens_plane_crash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plane Crashes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/08/10/ted_stevens_plane_crash</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 86-year-old former senator is among those killed in a remote pocket of Alaska]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[<strong>Update:</strong> <a href="http://www.ktuu.com/Global/story.asp?S=12952729">Alaska NBC affiliate KTUU reports</a> that former Ted Stevens is among those killed in the plane crash near Dillingham last night, according to his former aide and longtime friend Dave Dittman. The conditions of the survivors and the names of the others who died are still not known.]</p><p>[<strong>Update 2:</strong> <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN1015521720100810">Reuters reports</a> that Dittman has released a second statement saying that Stevens death "has not been confirmed."]</p><p>[<strong>Update 3</strong>: The Associated Press <a href="http://www.news-press.com/article/20100810/NEWS01/100810014/1075/AP--Family-spokesman-confirms-Sen.-Stevens-died-in-Alaska-plane-crash">has confirmed</a> that Stevens was killed. The status of O'Keefe is still unknown.]</p><p>Former U.S. Senator Ted Stevens and former NASA administrator Sean O'Keefe were both in a deadly plane crash <a href="http://www.adn.com/2010/08/09/1402798/plane-with-8-on-board-crashes.html">near Dillingham, Alaska</a> last night. Officials so far will not confirm if Stevens and/or O'Keefe are among <a href="http://www.local12.com/content/breaking_news/story/Former-Senator-NASA-Adminstrator-in-Plane-Crash/n6iy38YqWkG9Mv9loakjCA.cspx">the five dead</a> (out of <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2010/08/10/ted-stevens-presumed-aboard-downed-plane/">eight passengers</a>).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/10/ted_stevens_plane_crash/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/10/ted_stevens_plane_crash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

