<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Political Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/political_books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s the matter with Nebraska?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/20/whats_the_deal_with_nebraska/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/20/whats_the_deal_with_nebraska/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget Article IV of the Constitution! Isn't it about time we stop pretending that all states are created equal?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">I once drove through Nebraska, via I-80, days after my girlfriend broke up with me, on a self-imposed road trip from Los Angeles to Cedar Rapids to find my brother’s shoulder and cry on it. It is a long, straight, hypnotically boring drive that not only gave me ample time to think about the loss, but also put my recent heartbreak in much-needed perspective.</p><p><em>It could be worse</em>, I realized. <em>I could live here.</em></p><p>Cold comfort, perhaps, but comfort nonetheless. And so, for providing the enforced monotony that only a dull road trip can provide, and the bleak void to which to compare my own relatively full life, I am grateful to the state of Nebraska. Nebraska has a special place in my heart.</p><p>It has no place, however, on a map of the United States.</p><p>Let me explain: California is a state. New York is a state. Texas, for the time being at least, is a state. And they deserve to be. They’re big, they’re boisterous — but most crucially, they’re <em>populated</em>. Thirty-seven million people live in California, four million in Los Angeles alone. New York is home to almost 20 million people. If California were a country, it would have the eighth largest economy in the world. If New York City were its own state, it would be the 12th largest — and in my humble New Yorker opinion, the best.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/20/whats_the_deal_with_nebraska/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/20/whats_the_deal_with_nebraska/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>177</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Corporate criminals gone wild</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/corporate_criminals_gone_wild/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/corporate_criminals_gone_wild/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Job]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The maker of the documentary film "Inside Job" has a new book excoriating Wall Street -- and President Obama]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/08/inside_job/singleton/">"Inside Job,"</a> Charles Ferguson's Oscar-winning documentary film on how government, Wall Street and academia colluded to deliver us the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, made a powerful case that something was very very rotten at the heart of the American political/economic nexus. His follow-up book, "Predator Nation: Corporate Criminals, Political Corruption, and the Hijacking of America," can be considered the legal brief that dots every "i" and crosses every "t" in his argument. A tightly argued, profusely footnoted and deeply enraged castigation of everyone involved, "Predator Nation" isn't just a factually unchallengeable account of how Wall Street blew up the global economy. It's a denunciation, a call for justice and a warning: After getting away with the crime of the century, Wall Street still isn't satisfied.</p><p>"If you have already got 96 percent of what you want," Ferguson told Salon, "why not take the remaining 4? That's where the culture of American finance is right now, and I think it's really dangerous for the country."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/corporate_criminals_gone_wild/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/corporate_criminals_gone_wild/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Caro&#8217;s bloated LBJ biography</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/robert_caros_bloated_lbj_biography/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/robert_caros_bloated_lbj_biography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12916162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Caro's latest LBJ tome has everyone -- even Bill Clinton! -- hyping it. They've been had]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Even the President of the United States sometimes must have to stand naked.” When Bob Dylan wrote that line in 1964, the naked emperor was Lyndon Johnson, which makes that image perhaps the most disturbing in all of Dylan’s apocalyptic work.</p><p>By stripping down Lyndon Baines Johnson to his essence, Robert Caro has himself become an American legend. Since the publication of "The Path to Power" in 1982, Caro has transformed LBJ’s life into a cautionary tale of Shakespearean dimensions. In some wonky circles, the release of a new volume is heralded like the Summer of Love release of “Sgt. Pepper's.” Can Caro possibly top his “Revolver"?”</p><p>I am proud to be one of those wonks.  Anticipating the release of "The Passage of Power," I went full-metal LBJ, and reread every word of the previous 1,040 page “prequel” – “Master of the Senate.” Much like catching up on the last season of “Mad Men” before the new one begins, I time-traveled like the hero from the new Stephen King JFK-themed <a href="http://www.stephenking.com/promo/11-22-63/promo_page/">novel</a> back to 1958, as the Master Senator (and Master Biographer) prepared for their rendezvous with world history.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/robert_caros_bloated_lbj_biography/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/robert_caros_bloated_lbj_biography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Nikki Haley&#8217;s book full of lies?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/is_nikki_haleys_book_full_of_lies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/is_nikki_haleys_book_full_of_lies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikki Haley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12874091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Supposed Romney running mate front-runner under fire for memoir distortions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. As Mitt Romney <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/romney-taps-aide-beth-myers-to-run-search-for-vp-running-mate/2012/04/16/gIQA9o8PLT_blog.html">begins to seriously consider running mates</a>, South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley <a href="http://www.thestate.com/2012/04/15/2235292/south-carolina-governors-memoir.html#storylink=cpy">again finds herself under fire</a>. This time, the State newspaper has taken her to task for twisting the truth in her memoir, "Can't Is Not an Option." (That is for real the title of her memoir.)</p><p>Every politician's memoir, especially if written while the author is still in office, is a series of self-serving half-truths. There's really not much benefit to total and complete honesty, and most politicians are convinced enough of their own righteousness that they probably don't even think of their omissions and distortions as dishonest. So, everyone Haley trashes in her book says she is lying. That is not that surprising!</p><p>Among the points of contention:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/is_nikki_haleys_book_full_of_lies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/is_nikki_haleys_book_full_of_lies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regular &#8220;Hardball&#8221; guests agree: Chris Matthews&#8217; new JFK book is the best book</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/matthews_logrolling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/matthews_logrolling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10231243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MSNBC host's Kennedy biography is "lyrical," "riveting" and "graceful," according to frequent MSNBC guests]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Matthews is very proud of his new biography of John F. Kennedy. <a href="www.mediaite.com/print/chis-matthews-jfk-biography-is-the-best-ever-written-on-the-subject-according-to-chris-matthews/">"It is actually the best book" on the subject of John F. Kennedy, according to Matthews.</a> "People who know their business say it's the best book."</p><p>Who are these people? What business do they know? I am going to go out on a limb and say that these people know the business of political punditry. Part of the business of political punditry, like most jobs in media and publishing, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logrolling">is logrolling.</a></p><p>The back of Matthews' "Jack Kennedy: Elusive Hero" features advance praise from historian and frequent "Hardball" guest Doris Kearns Goodwin ("Chris Matthews is a masterful storyteller"); historian, writer and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32954283/ns/msnbc_tv-hardball_with_chris_matthews/t/hardball-chris-matthews-friday-september/">occasional "Hardball" guest</a> Douglas Brinkley ("I give it ten gold stars!"); biographer and Aspen Institute president Walter Isaacson ("an awesome and delightful book"); and frequent MSNBC commentator and batty old aunt Peggy Noonan ("an insightful piece of work and <em>a great time!"</em> italics hers); My favorite blurb of all is from NBC anchor and amateur comedian Brian Williams: "Chris Matthews takes on a giant of American life—and triumphs." So in this book, Chris Matthews ... fights JFK? And beats him?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/matthews_logrolling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/matthews_logrolling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shrum: Mitt Romney winning because he looks pretty grown-up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10197737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Perry should've read Chris Matthews' new book, says a veteran of countless losing campaigns]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Mitt Romney is the only adult in the room," <a href="http://theweek.com/bullpen/column/221341/mitt-romney-is-the-only-adult-in-the-room/1">according to Democratic campaign consultant Bob Shrum</a>, who dutifully typed out a thousand words of campaign analysis for The Week. It is obvious but basically true, though if "the room" contains Jon Huntsman and Gary Johnson, it might be more accurate to refer to Mitt as "the only adult in the room willing to tell the kids that Santa is real even if he himself clearly doesn't believe it." ("The kids" are Republican voters and "Santa is real" is modern conservative dogma.) (Just go with me here.)</p><p>This is defining adult down. Mitt Romney is tall and has nice hair. He looks like a dad in a Cialis commercial. He's on a stage with smug adulterer Newt Gingrich, serial sexual harassment clown Herman Cain, crazy-eyed witch-burner Michele Bachmann, and out-of-date George W. Bush impression Rick Perry. So, sure, Romney, why not?</p><p>What went wrong for Perry, though? I mean besides the fact that he is pretty obviously both dimwitted and lazy. According to Shrum, who quotes the book at length, what went wrong for Perry is that he did not prepare for the debate by reading Chris Matthews' "lyrical new book 'Jack Kennedy: Elusive Hero,'" which Shrum quotes at length.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jack Abramoff plays the earnest reformer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/jack_abramoff_plays_the_earnest_reformer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/jack_abramoff_plays_the_earnest_reformer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60 Minutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10173462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his new book and in a "60 Minutes" interview, the felon and former super-lobbyist poses as a changed man]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack Abramoff is back! He's selling a book, naturally. (The movie was already made, limiting his cashing-in opportunities.) To celebrate, <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57319075/jack-abramoff-the-lobbyists-playbook/">"60 Minutes" had him on</a> to look sort of contrite while nostalgically reminiscing over his time as Washington's top incredibly corrupt super-lobbyist.</p><p>Abramoff pleaded guilty to defrauding his lobbying clients through over-billing and double-dealing. He admitted to bribery and wire fraud. In his interview, Abramoff explained basically How He Did It, and it turns out that it's really not that hard to "bribe" a member of Congress. Offer their staffers jobs and give the members lots of gifts and campaign donations. Then you can write whatever you want into pending legislation, more or less.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/jack_abramoff_plays_the_earnest_reformer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/jack_abramoff_plays_the_earnest_reformer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palins give free publicity to book bashing Palins</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe McGinniss' "The Rogue" gets a big marketing boost from its subject's classic (and predictable) overreaction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here, according <a href="http://gawker.com/5840227/all-the-dirty-new-rumors-about-sarah-palins-sexual-fetish-and-cocaine-use">to the National Enquirer,</a> are the shocking revelations in Joe McGinniss' new book about Sarah Palin, "The Rogue":</p><ul>
<li>She has done drugs.</li>
<li>She had sex with a basketball player before she married Todd.</li>
<li>She is mean and petty.</li>
<li>She is a bad mother.</li>
<li>She had an affair after she married Todd.</li>
</ul><p>There is also, obviously, some stuff about Trig's birth, but I have not yet read the book, so I couldn't tell you how far down the rabbit hole that goes.</p><p>Here's my reaction to those revelations: Sarah Palin is a person! She's done drugs and pissed people off and slept with people, like 90 percent of American humans. If Sarah Palin was smart she'd dismiss the book with a chuckle, say nobody's perfect, laugh off the "gossip," and move on.</p><p>Sarah Palin might not be smart.</p><p>The Palins always prefer grand self-pitying martyrdom to quiet dignity, of course, which is why picking on them can be so profitable: They will <em>always</em> respond, and <em>always</em> help you drum up more publicity for your Palin-attacking venture. Instead of depriving the book of oxygen, they launched a multimedia attack on Joe McGinniss before he'd finished the first draft, and what they accomplished was ... giving him more material and ensuring that even more breathless anticipation awaited the book's release.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guy who wants Obama to read less fiction not as concerned about Cheney&#8217;s reading list</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/cheney_books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/cheney_books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/06/cheney_books</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tevi Troy says the former Vice President may not have read much nonfiction, but he did meet with guys who write]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember Tevi Troy, the Republican "former senior White House aide" who criticized Barack Obama at the National Review Online <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/index.html">for reading well-reviewed novels</a> instead of Jonah Goldberg's "Liberal Fascism" and other conservative book club selections? He's back with <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/276400/reading-cheneys-reading-tevi-troy">another of his wonderful posts about the reading habits</a> of prominent politicians. This time, he's talking Dick Cheney.</p><p>Dick Cheney's memoir apparently mentions a lot of books he read and enjoyed. Mostly books about wars and frontier settlers and so on. Good Republican books. But the Washington Post's nonfiction book editor <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/dick-cheneys-reading-list/2011/08/26/gIQAuIywgJ_print.html">notes that Cheney doesn't mention reading anything while actually in office as vice president:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/cheney_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/cheney_books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Donnell, Bachmann, Palin failures point to growing crazy fatigue</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Exploitation of liberal-scaring culture war heroines growing less profitable every day]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The liberal media will never lose their obsession with the photogenic crazies of the conservative movement, but there are a few hints (enough for a trend piece) that the public at large is getting a bit sick of them. (The outlier is Rick Perry's poll numbers.)</p><p>The Newsweek Michele Bachman cover <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/press/controversy-selling-tina-brown-134479">posted newsstand sales no higher than most other Newsweek covers</a>. The <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/08/09/bachmann_photo_not_sexist">"crazy eyes" cover</a> moved 47,225 copies, according to Newsweek, though AdWeek says other industry sources say it sold somewhere between 35,000 and 48,000. Is that good? Well, "the magazine's single copy sales averaged 46,561 per issue in the first half of 2011."</p><p>We are talking only about newsstand sales, not total circulation, but this does mean that Bachmann's incredibly controversial and very buzzy crazy eyes did not "move the needle," as annoying people say. Of course, the actual <em>article</em> about Bachmann, inside of the eye-grabbing cover, <a href="salon.com/politics/war_room/2011/08/08/bachmann_theocrat_nyer/">was pretty bland.</a> But since when does the quality of the journalism have anything to do with newsstand sales?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Review asks why Obama reads critically acclaimed fiction instead of Jonah Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mysteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/23/obama_fiction</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservative "intellectuals" examine the president's vacation book list -- and become concerned]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama is reading gritty rural neo-noir by an acknowledged master of the crime fiction genre, and the National Review <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/275264/what-s-obama-reading-tevi-troy#">is not happy with him</a>. The president bought Daniel Woodrell's "Bayou Trilogy," along with a number of other novels, at a Martha's Vineyard bookstore, and Tevi Troy, a "senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a former senior White House aide" ("senior fellow at the Hudson Institute" means "minor Republican apparatchik in need of a paycheck while his party's out of power") <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/275264/what-s-obama-reading-tevi-troy#">is analyzing the president's reading list for you.</a></p><blockquote>
<p>The reports are in about the books President Obama is looking at on his annual trip to Martha&#8217;s Vineyard. According to reports from the Los Angeles Times and the AP, Obama purchased five books on his trip to the Vineyard bookseller Bunch of Grapes: Marianna Baer&#8217;s Frost, Aldous Huxley&#8217;s Brave New World, Daniel Woodrell&#8217;s Bayou Trilogy, Emma Donoghue&#8217;s Room, and Ward Just&#8217;s Rodin&#8217;s Debutante.</p>
<p>The second wave came when, according to Alexis Simendinger, White House aides listed for reporters the three books Obama brought with him to the Vineyard: two more novels &#8212; Abraham Verghese&#8217;s Cutting for Stone and David Grossman&#8217;s To the End of the Land &#8212; and one nonfiction work &#8212; Isabel Wilkerson&#8217;s The Warmth of Other Suns: The Epic Story of America&#8217;s Great Migration.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell just walked off CNN because she was running late</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus, the book-promoting election loser calls the president "a strapping young man"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems pretty obvious that Christine O'Donnell "walking off" that CNN show hosted by the oleaginous talent show judge and former phone-hacker <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Vox-News/2011/0818/Did-Christine-O-Donnell-plan-to-walk-off-Piers-Morgan-VIDEO">was a put-on, right?</a> Not like it was "scripted," per se, but it certainly wasn't a spontaneous decision inspired by a particularly outrageous line of questioning. Anyone can come up with something anodyne and vague to say about gay marriage -- the president does it all the time! -- if one doesn't feel like offering a decisive opinion. So Christine O'Donnell obviously left for other reasons. Publicity for her book? In part, probably. But was she also just ... late for another appointment?</p><p>That's what she told the crowd assembled at Women's National Republican Club in New York, where she was apparently booked to speak at the same time that she was booked to be interviewed on cable news by that guy from "The Apprentice." <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/christine-odonnell-on-her-piers-morgan-walk-out-hes-looking-for-ratings/">The New York Observer was there:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five political books that were doomed before they were even published</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Donald Trump on policy" and other ideas that briefly sounded very good]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On May 12, it was reported that Donald Trump was working on a "policy book," to be <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/05/12/trump_to_write_policy_book_109836.html">released this summer by the right-wing Regnery Publishing.</a> No surprise there: All candidates and would-be candidates for president release either memoirs or policy books, or both. On May 16, less than a week later, Trump announced that he will not be running for president. Whoops! Now that book is pointless, months before the ghostwriter has finished it.</p><p>Trump's is not the first, and will not be the last political book that was rendered ridiculous or blatantly incorrect before or very shortly after its release. It's not even the only one released this year! Here are some of our favorite sad, wrong books:</p><p><strong>"Where's the Birth Certificate?</strong>" by <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299">Jerome Corsi, 2011</a></p><p>Oh, <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf">there it is!</a> Sorry, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1305844173&amp;sr=8-1">Jerome Corsi</a>, but you couldn't have realized that your entirely pointless search for the "long-form" birth certificate would end nearly a month before your book's publication.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Awful election book to become awful election film</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The most inane gossip of 2008 is set to be dramatized for HBO]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After living through the 2008 election, does anyone really need to see a movie about it? HBO apparently thinks so. The network made news yesterday -- masterfully -- by <a href="http://www.etonline.com/tv/108614_Julianne_Moore_Cast_as_Sarah_Palin/">leaking the news that Julianne Moore has been cast as Sarah Palin</a> in the upcoming made-for-television adaptation of "Game Change," the most annoying political book of the post-Bush age. (I am counting even Dick Morris' latest. It's <em>that</em> annoying.)</p><p>Everyone already knows everything about that election. It will be fun, I guess, to watch famous people pretend to be other famous people. For a while. But that particular pleasure usually wears off about three minutes into your average "SNL" political cold open. And we are all already intimately familiar with nearly everything our dramatis personae will do and say.</p><p>I, for one, would rather watch a film dramatizing the 1948 election. Or 1876! Almost any close election that happened prior to the age of 24-hour cable news and blogs would be infinitely more interesting to watch unfold on television than the one everyone in the nation just sat through.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumsfeld refuses to deny being a lizard person</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Louis C.K. asks the tough questions as an ill-advised interview with the former defense secretary takes an odd turn]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Rumsfeld's book tour is probably making him miserable. Here's a guy with deep contempt for the press in general subjecting himself to impudent questioning of his decisions, and this doesn't seem like a man who feels the need to justify his decisions. He even had to pretend to enjoy a discussion with Jon Stewart.</p><p>But, honestly, I don't understand what led him to actually call in to "The Opie and Anthony Show." I mean, there was some interesting, informative discussion of Rumsfeld's history and politics and so on. I think. But all anyone will remember <a href="http://wonkette.com/439328/donald-rumsfeld-refuses-to-answer-whether-or-not-hes-a-lizard-person">is that comedian Louis C.K. repeatedly asked Rumsfeld if he was a lizard person.</a></p><p>This is an edited version of the interview, as uploaded by Louis C.K.:</p><p>
    <object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dK8Y2nO_8TM?version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dK8Y2nO_8TM?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New book about Sarah Palin confirms what you know about Sarah Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/palin_book_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/palin_book_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/22/palin_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Alaska governor is paranoid and obsessed with the media, according to a former aide]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who worked with her have once again portrayed Sarah Palin as petty, vindictive, dim, hypersensitive to perceived slights, and obsessed with how the media portray her. Surprise! A book about Palin, written by former Palin aide Frank Bailey with the publisher of the Alaska blog <a href="http://www.themudflats.net/">Mudflats</a>, has been <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49938.html">leaked to the press,</a> because publishers have not yet expressed interest in it (though I bet a good editor could whip the 450-page manuscript into shape). I'm sure this will help Palin recognize that her paranoia has become destructive and damaging to her reputation.</p><p>The fun parts of "In Blind Allegiance to Sarah Palin: A Memoir of Our Tumultuous Years" (woof) are, of course, the e-mails from Palin herself, who always comes off as everyone's worst BlackBerry-addicted boss. Here's what she wrote to her staff after an invitation to speak at a fundraising dinner was rescinded because she never confirmed her attendance (she is very bad at showing up to meetings or scheduled appearances on time, or at all):</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/palin_book_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/palin_book_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Romney rewrites book to make himself look less reasonable</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The paperback edition of "No Apology" no longer likes the stimulus, really hates "Obamacare"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney is the most nakedly, obviously, transparently phony politician in the nation, and you almost have to admire him for it. He will say anything to get elected president. He is on both sides of every issue. He's so awful at pretending to be a True Conservative Populist Dingbat, but so convinced that a pragmatic blue-state moderate Republican is unelectable, that if it weren't for his hundreds of millions of dollars you might feel bad for him.</p><p>So the paperback version of his book "No Apology" is out, <a href="http://thephoenix.com/boston/news/115412-mitt-rewrites-himself">and he has excised and altered various passages</a> that he had originally included in order to make himself look like a moderate pragmatist, because he realized that "Tea Parties" are still in fashion.</p><p><a href="http://thephoenix.com/boston/news/115412-mitt-rewrites-himself">As the Boston Phoenix reports,</a> there are two significant changes: The book no longer offers even a qualified defense of the stimulus, and now it makes sure the reader knows that Mitt Romney <em>really</em> hates "Obamacare," even though it's basically a national version of Mitt Romney's Massachusetts healthcare plan.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RummyLeaks: &#8220;The President said that the Senate and the House were a joke&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald and the president conspire to get him into the U.S. Senate, discuss Adlai Stevenson III's good looks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More true tales of Nixon <a href="http://www.rumsfeld.com/library/page/nixon-administration-documents">from Donald Rumsfeld's vast document dump.</a> Yesterday, we learned that Richard Nixon <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/index.html">"doesn't shoot blanks."</a> Today, we learn what Nixon thought of Congress, and how he planned for his favorite employees' futures.</p><p>In November 1972, shortly after Nixon was reelected, Donald Rumsfeld wanted to leave the executive branch and maybe run for office again. (He had been, prior to the Nixon administration, a congressman from Illinois.) He looked to have his eye on the Senate. First, though, he needed some good foreign policy experience -- he'd been stuck running the Office of Economic Opportunity, and then the Cost of Living Council, both organizations with mandates that Rumsfeld didn't agree with -- and so he had a meeting with the president, to discus his options.</p><p>Nixon was in a chatty mood, and Rumsfeld recorded his every thought, for his files.</p><p>First, Nixon was unimpressed with the entirety of the United States Congress: "The President said that the Senate and the House were a joke. There was no strength there."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RummyLeaks: &#8220;The President then said, &#8216;Richard Nixon doesn&#8217;t shoot blanks&#8217;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld's contemporary account of a deeply weird 1972 White House cabinet meeting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Rumsfeld is promoting his upcoming memoir with a document dump, which is actually a pretty great idea. The documents <a href="http://www.rumsfeld.com/">he's released at Rumsfeld.com</a> aren't even limited to his tenure in the Bush administration -- they go back to his time in Congress, and then his work for Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. Rumsfeld's detailed report from a November 8, 1972 cabinet meeting is incredible. In great detail, Rumsfeld summarizes a classic, rambling Nixon monologue, performed the day after Nixon's landslide reelection.</p><p>"Rambling" does not even do it justice, actually. Highlights:</p><ul>
<li>"[Nixon] said 'politics is a game of inches' and that we had 49 touchdowns and they, the Democrats/McGovern, had one touchdown and a field goal -- the field goal being Washington D.C.."</li>
<li>"The President then said, 'Richard Nixon doesn't shoot blanks.'"</li>
<li>"Next week we should think through how to best serve, and that he will have the individual conversations with each. He said we are too busy doing things instead of thinking. He said that Richard Nixon does more thinking because of the discipline he imposes on himself. We ought to think through where the Administration ought to go. <strong>He said that with one exception he will have no appointments on Sunday afternoons because he has missed enough football games already.</strong>"</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donald Rumsfeld was right about everything, book by Rumsfeld claims</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former defense secretary's memoir attempts to set the record straight on how great Rumsfeld was]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reviled two-time Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has finally written his memoir. It is titled "Known and Unknown," after a typically obtuse quote he gave to the press while mismanaging the "global war on terrorism." In his memoir, Rumsfeld is settling various old scores, and, obviously, trying to convince everyone that he is not responsible for the various awful failures and fiascoes that occurred at the Pentagon during his tenure in the Bush administration. Like, for example, the whole "Iraq invasion and occupation" thing. <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48749.html">According to Rumsfeld, he totally intended to do it right, but stupid President Bush wouldn't let him:</a></p><blockquote>
<p>Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld says in a new book that he wanted to oversee the initial reconstruction of Iraq following the United States&#8217; invasion of the country but he was rebuffed by President George W. Bush.</p>
<p>"Bush didn&#8217;t cotton to the idea," Rumsfeld writes in his yet-to-be-released memoir Known and Unknown, excerpts of which were obtained by POLITICO.</p>
<p>"'What if we had a problem with North Korea?'" Bush asked, according to a scene that Rumsfeld said took place just before the 2003 invasion.</p>
<p>"'Well, Mr. President, if that happened,' I replied, 'I would come home immediately.' The President thought about that for a moment. Then he shook his head. 'No, Don, you need to be here.' I should have pressed the point harder."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

