<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Political Books</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/political_books/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Regular &#8220;Hardball&#8221; guests agree: Chris Matthews&#8217; new JFK book is the best book</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/matthews_logrolling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/matthews_logrolling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Matthews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10231243</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Chris Matthews is very proud of his new biography of John F. Kennedy. <a href="www.mediaite.com/print/chis-matthews-jfk-biography-is-the-best-ever-written-on-the-subject-according-to-chris-matthews/">"It is actually the best book" on the subject of John F. Kennedy, according to Matthews.</a> "People who know their business say it's the best book."</p><p>Who are these people? What business do they know? I am going to go out on a limb and say that these people know the business of political punditry. Part of the business of political punditry, like most jobs in media and publishing, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logrolling">is logrolling.</a></p><p>The back of Matthews' "Jack Kennedy: Elusive Hero" features advance praise from historian and frequent "Hardball" guest Doris Kearns Goodwin ("Chris Matthews is a masterful storyteller"); historian, writer and <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32954283/ns/msnbc_tv-hardball_with_chris_matthews/t/hardball-chris-matthews-friday-september/">occasional "Hardball" guest</a> Douglas Brinkley ("I give it ten gold stars!"); biographer and Aspen Institute president Walter Isaacson ("an awesome and delightful book"); and frequent MSNBC commentator and batty old aunt Peggy Noonan ("an insightful piece of work and <em>a great time!"</em> italics hers); My favorite blurb of all is from NBC anchor and amateur comedian Brian Williams: "Chris Matthews takes on a giant of American life—and triumphs." So in this book, Chris Matthews ... fights JFK? And beats him?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/matthews_logrolling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/matthews_logrolling/">http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/matthews_logrolling/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/matthews_logrolling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/17/matthews_logrolling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shrum: Mitt Romney winning because he looks pretty grown-up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10197737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"Mitt Romney is the only adult in the room," <a href="http://theweek.com/bullpen/column/221341/mitt-romney-is-the-only-adult-in-the-room/1">according to Democratic campaign consultant Bob Shrum</a>, who dutifully typed out a thousand words of campaign analysis for The Week. It is obvious but basically true, though if "the room" contains Jon Huntsman and Gary Johnson, it might be more accurate to refer to Mitt as "the only adult in the room willing to tell the kids that Santa is real even if he himself clearly doesn't believe it." ("The kids" are Republican voters and "Santa is real" is modern conservative dogma.) (Just go with me here.)</p><p>This is defining adult down. Mitt Romney is tall and has nice hair. He looks like a dad in a Cialis commercial. He's on a stage with smug adulterer Newt Gingrich, serial sexual harassment clown Herman Cain, crazy-eyed witch-burner Michele Bachmann, and out-of-date George W. Bush impression Rick Perry. So, sure, Romney, why not?</p><p>What went wrong for Perry, though? I mean besides the fact that he is pretty obviously both dimwitted and lazy. According to Shrum, who quotes the book at length, what went wrong for Perry is that he did not prepare for the debate by reading Chris Matthews' "lyrical new book 'Jack Kennedy: Elusive Hero,'" which Shrum quotes at length.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/">http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jack Abramoff plays the earnest reformer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/jack_abramoff_plays_the_earnest_reformer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/jack_abramoff_plays_the_earnest_reformer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Abramoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbyists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[60 Minutes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10173462</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Jack Abramoff is back! He's selling a book, naturally. (The movie was already made, limiting his cashing-in opportunities.) To celebrate, <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18560_162-57319075/jack-abramoff-the-lobbyists-playbook/">"60 Minutes" had him on</a> to look sort of contrite while nostalgically reminiscing over his time as Washington's top incredibly corrupt super-lobbyist.</p><p>Abramoff pleaded guilty to defrauding his lobbying clients through over-billing and double-dealing. He admitted to bribery and wire fraud. In his interview, Abramoff explained basically How He Did It, and it turns out that it's really not that hard to "bribe" a member of Congress. Offer their staffers jobs and give the members lots of gifts and campaign donations. Then you can write whatever you want into pending legislation, more or less.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/jack_abramoff_plays_the_earnest_reformer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/jack_abramoff_plays_the_earnest_reformer/">http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/jack_abramoff_plays_the_earnest_reformer/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/jack_abramoff_plays_the_earnest_reformer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/08/jack_abramoff_plays_the_earnest_reformer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palins give free publicity to book bashing Palins</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Here, according <a href="http://gawker.com/5840227/all-the-dirty-new-rumors-about-sarah-palins-sexual-fetish-and-cocaine-use">to the National Enquirer,</a> are the shocking revelations in Joe McGinniss' new book about Sarah Palin, "The Rogue":</p><ul>
<li>She has done drugs.</li>
<li>She had sex with a basketball player before she married Todd.</li>
<li>She is mean and petty.</li>
<li>She is a bad mother.</li>
<li>She had an affair after she married Todd.</li>
</ul><p>There is also, obviously, some stuff about Trig's birth, but I have not yet read the book, so I couldn't tell you how far down the rabbit hole that goes.</p><p>Here's my reaction to those revelations: Sarah Palin is a person! She's done drugs and pissed people off and slept with people, like 90 percent of American humans. If Sarah Palin was smart she'd dismiss the book with a chuckle, say nobody's perfect, laugh off the "gossip," and move on.</p><p>Sarah Palin might not be smart.</p><p>The Palins always prefer grand self-pitying martyrdom to quiet dignity, of course, which is why picking on them can be so profitable: They will <em>always</em> respond, and <em>always</em> help you drum up more publicity for your Palin-attacking venture. Instead of depriving the book of oxygen, they launched a multimedia attack on Joe McGinniss before he'd finished the first draft, and what they accomplished was ... giving him more material and ensuring that even more breathless anticipation awaited the book's release.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/">http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/15/palin_book_responde/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guy who wants Obama to read less fiction not as concerned about Cheney&#8217;s reading list</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/cheney_books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/cheney_books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/06/cheney_books</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Remember Tevi Troy, the Republican "former senior White House aide" who criticized Barack Obama at the National Review Online <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/index.html">for reading well-reviewed novels</a> instead of Jonah Goldberg's "Liberal Fascism" and other conservative book club selections? He's back with <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/276400/reading-cheneys-reading-tevi-troy">another of his wonderful posts about the reading habits</a> of prominent politicians. This time, he's talking Dick Cheney.</p><p>Dick Cheney's memoir apparently mentions a lot of books he read and enjoyed. Mostly books about wars and frontier settlers and so on. Good Republican books. But the Washington Post's nonfiction book editor <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/entertainment/books/dick-cheneys-reading-list/2011/08/26/gIQAuIywgJ_print.html">notes that Cheney doesn't mention reading anything while actually in office as vice president:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/cheney_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/cheney_books/">http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/cheney_books/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/cheney_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/cheney_books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O&#8217;Donnell, Bachmann, Palin failures point to growing crazy fatigue</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Census]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The liberal media will never lose their obsession with the photogenic crazies of the conservative movement, but there are a few hints (enough for a trend piece) that the public at large is getting a bit sick of them. (The outlier is Rick Perry's poll numbers.)</p><p>The Newsweek Michele Bachman cover <a href="http://www.adweek.com/news/press/controversy-selling-tina-brown-134479">posted newsstand sales no higher than most other Newsweek covers</a>. The <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/08/09/bachmann_photo_not_sexist">"crazy eyes" cover</a> moved 47,225 copies, according to Newsweek, though AdWeek says other industry sources say it sold somewhere between 35,000 and 48,000. Is that good? Well, "the magazine's single copy sales averaged 46,561 per issue in the first half of 2011."</p><p>We are talking only about newsstand sales, not total circulation, but this does mean that Bachmann's incredibly controversial and very buzzy crazy eyes did not "move the needle," as annoying people say. Of course, the actual <em>article</em> about Bachmann, inside of the eye-grabbing cover, <a href="salon.com/politics/war_room/2011/08/08/bachmann_theocrat_nyer/">was pretty bland.</a> But since when does the quality of the journalism have anything to do with newsstand sales?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/">http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/bachmann_odonnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Review asks why Obama reads critically acclaimed fiction instead of Jonah Goldberg</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mysteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/23/obama_fiction</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama is reading gritty rural neo-noir by an acknowledged master of the crime fiction genre, and the National Review <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/275264/what-s-obama-reading-tevi-troy#">is not happy with him</a>. The president bought Daniel Woodrell's "Bayou Trilogy," along with a number of other novels, at a Martha's Vineyard bookstore, and Tevi Troy, a "senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a former senior White House aide" ("senior fellow at the Hudson Institute" means "minor Republican apparatchik in need of a paycheck while his party's out of power") <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/275264/what-s-obama-reading-tevi-troy#">is analyzing the president's reading list for you.</a></p><blockquote>
<p>The reports are in about the books President Obama is looking at on his annual trip to Martha&#8217;s Vineyard. According to reports from the Los Angeles Times and the AP, Obama purchased five books on his trip to the Vineyard bookseller Bunch of Grapes: Marianna Baer&#8217;s Frost, Aldous Huxley&#8217;s Brave New World, Daniel Woodrell&#8217;s Bayou Trilogy, Emma Donoghue&#8217;s Room, and Ward Just&#8217;s Rodin&#8217;s Debutante.</p>
<p>The second wave came when, according to Alexis Simendinger, White House aides listed for reporters the three books Obama brought with him to the Vineyard: two more novels &#8212; Abraham Verghese&#8217;s Cutting for Stone and David Grossman&#8217;s To the End of the Land &#8212; and one nonfiction work &#8212; Isabel Wilkerson&#8217;s The Warmth of Other Suns: The Epic Story of America&#8217;s Great Migration.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/">http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/23/obama_fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>160</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell just walked off CNN because she was running late</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It seems pretty obvious that Christine O'Donnell "walking off" that CNN show hosted by the oleaginous talent show judge and former phone-hacker <a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Elections/Vox-News/2011/0818/Did-Christine-O-Donnell-plan-to-walk-off-Piers-Morgan-VIDEO">was a put-on, right?</a> Not like it was "scripted," per se, but it certainly wasn't a spontaneous decision inspired by a particularly outrageous line of questioning. Anyone can come up with something anodyne and vague to say about gay marriage -- the president does it all the time! -- if one doesn't feel like offering a decisive opinion. So Christine O'Donnell obviously left for other reasons. Publicity for her book? In part, probably. But was she also just ... late for another appointment?</p><p>That's what she told the crowd assembled at Women's National Republican Club in New York, where she was apparently booked to speak at the same time that she was booked to be interviewed on cable news by that guy from "The Apprentice." <a href="http://www.observer.com/2011/08/christine-odonnell-on-her-piers-morgan-walk-out-hes-looking-for-ratings/">The New York Observer was there:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/">http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/odonnell_walk_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five political books that were doomed before they were even published</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 11:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>On May 12, it was reported that Donald Trump was working on a "policy book," to be <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/05/12/trump_to_write_policy_book_109836.html">released this summer by the right-wing Regnery Publishing.</a> No surprise there: All candidates and would-be candidates for president release either memoirs or policy books, or both. On May 16, less than a week later, Trump announced that he will not be running for president. Whoops! Now that book is pointless, months before the ghostwriter has finished it.</p><p>Trump's is not the first, and will not be the last political book that was rendered ridiculous or blatantly incorrect before or very shortly after its release. It's not even the only one released this year! Here are some of our favorite sad, wrong books:</p><p><strong>"Where's the Birth Certificate?</strong>" by <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299">Jerome Corsi, 2011</a></p><p>Oh, <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf">there it is!</a> Sorry, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Wheres-Birth-Certificate-Eligible-President/dp/1936488299/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1305844173&amp;sr=8-1">Jerome Corsi</a>, but you couldn't have realized that your entirely pointless search for the "long-form" birth certificate would end nearly a month before your book's publication.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/">http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/20/bad_idea_books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Awful election book to become awful election film</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Game Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>After living through the 2008 election, does anyone really need to see a movie about it? HBO apparently thinks so. The network made news yesterday -- masterfully -- by <a href="http://www.etonline.com/tv/108614_Julianne_Moore_Cast_as_Sarah_Palin/">leaking the news that Julianne Moore has been cast as Sarah Palin</a> in the upcoming made-for-television adaptation of "Game Change," the most annoying political book of the post-Bush age. (I am counting even Dick Morris' latest. It's <em>that</em> annoying.)</p><p>Everyone already knows everything about that election. It will be fun, I guess, to watch famous people pretend to be other famous people. For a while. But that particular pleasure usually wears off about three minutes into your average "SNL" political cold open. And we are all already intimately familiar with nearly everything our dramatis personae will do and say.</p><p>I, for one, would rather watch a film dramatizing the 1948 election. Or 1876! Almost any close election that happened prior to the age of 24-hour cable news and blogs would be infinitely more interesting to watch unfold on television than the one everyone in the nation just sat through.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh/">http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/halperin_movie_ugh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rumsfeld refuses to deny being a lizard person</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Donald Rumsfeld's book tour is probably making him miserable. Here's a guy with deep contempt for the press in general subjecting himself to impudent questioning of his decisions, and this doesn't seem like a man who feels the need to justify his decisions. He even had to pretend to enjoy a discussion with Jon Stewart.</p><p>But, honestly, I don't understand what led him to actually call in to "The Opie and Anthony Show." I mean, there was some interesting, informative discussion of Rumsfeld's history and politics and so on. I think. But all anyone will remember <a href="http://wonkette.com/439328/donald-rumsfeld-refuses-to-answer-whether-or-not-hes-a-lizard-person">is that comedian Louis C.K. repeatedly asked Rumsfeld if he was a lizard person.</a></p><p>This is an edited version of the interview, as uploaded by Louis C.K.:</p><p>
    <object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/dK8Y2nO_8TM?version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/dK8Y2nO_8TM?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/">http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/25/rumsfeld_lizard_person/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New book about Sarah Palin confirms what you know about Sarah Palin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/palin_book_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/palin_book_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/22/palin_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>People who worked with her have once again portrayed Sarah Palin as petty, vindictive, dim, hypersensitive to perceived slights, and obsessed with how the media portray her. Surprise! A book about Palin, written by former Palin aide Frank Bailey with the publisher of the Alaska blog <a href="http://www.themudflats.net/">Mudflats</a>, has been <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49938.html">leaked to the press,</a> because publishers have not yet expressed interest in it (though I bet a good editor could whip the 450-page manuscript into shape). I'm sure this will help Palin recognize that her paranoia has become destructive and damaging to her reputation.</p><p>The fun parts of "In Blind Allegiance to Sarah Palin: A Memoir of Our Tumultuous Years" (woof) are, of course, the e-mails from Palin herself, who always comes off as everyone's worst BlackBerry-addicted boss. Here's what she wrote to her staff after an invitation to speak at a fundraising dinner was rescinded because she never confirmed her attendance (she is very bad at showing up to meetings or scheduled appearances on time, or at all):</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/palin_book_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/palin_book_5/">http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/palin_book_5/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/palin_book_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/22/palin_book_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt Romney rewrites book to make himself look less reasonable</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney is the most nakedly, obviously, transparently phony politician in the nation, and you almost have to admire him for it. He will say anything to get elected president. He is on both sides of every issue. He's so awful at pretending to be a True Conservative Populist Dingbat, but so convinced that a pragmatic blue-state moderate Republican is unelectable, that if it weren't for his hundreds of millions of dollars you might feel bad for him.</p><p>So the paperback version of his book "No Apology" is out, <a href="http://thephoenix.com/boston/news/115412-mitt-rewrites-himself">and he has excised and altered various passages</a> that he had originally included in order to make himself look like a moderate pragmatist, because he realized that "Tea Parties" are still in fashion.</p><p><a href="http://thephoenix.com/boston/news/115412-mitt-rewrites-himself">As the Boston Phoenix reports,</a> there are two significant changes: The book no longer offers even a qualified defense of the stimulus, and now it makes sure the reader knows that Mitt Romney <em>really</em> hates "Obamacare," even though it's basically a national version of Mitt Romney's Massachusetts healthcare plan.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book/">http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/romney_rewrites_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RummyLeaks: &#8220;The President said that the Senate and the House were a joke&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>More true tales of Nixon <a href="http://www.rumsfeld.com/library/page/nixon-administration-documents">from Donald Rumsfeld's vast document dump.</a> Yesterday, we learned that Richard Nixon <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/index.html">"doesn't shoot blanks."</a> Today, we learn what Nixon thought of Congress, and how he planned for his favorite employees' futures.</p><p>In November 1972, shortly after Nixon was reelected, Donald Rumsfeld wanted to leave the executive branch and maybe run for office again. (He had been, prior to the Nixon administration, a congressman from Illinois.) He looked to have his eye on the Senate. First, though, he needed some good foreign policy experience -- he'd been stuck running the Office of Economic Opportunity, and then the Cost of Living Council, both organizations with mandates that Rumsfeld didn't agree with -- and so he had a meeting with the president, to discus his options.</p><p>Nixon was in a chatty mood, and Rumsfeld recorded his every thought, for his files.</p><p>First, Nixon was unimpressed with the entirety of the United States Congress: "The President said that the Senate and the House were a joke. There was no strength there."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/">http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/rumsfeld_nixon_congress/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RummyLeaks: &#8220;The President then said, &#8216;Richard Nixon doesn&#8217;t shoot blanks&#8217;&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Donald Rumsfeld is promoting his upcoming memoir with a document dump, which is actually a pretty great idea. The documents <a href="http://www.rumsfeld.com/">he's released at Rumsfeld.com</a> aren't even limited to his tenure in the Bush administration -- they go back to his time in Congress, and then his work for Presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. Rumsfeld's detailed report from a November 8, 1972 cabinet meeting is incredible. In great detail, Rumsfeld summarizes a classic, rambling Nixon monologue, performed the day after Nixon's landslide reelection.</p><p>"Rambling" does not even do it justice, actually. Highlights:</p><ul>
<li>"[Nixon] said 'politics is a game of inches' and that we had 49 touchdowns and they, the Democrats/McGovern, had one touchdown and a field goal -- the field goal being Washington D.C.."</li>
<li>"The President then said, 'Richard Nixon doesn't shoot blanks.'"</li>
<li>"Next week we should think through how to best serve, and that he will have the individual conversations with each. He said we are too busy doing things instead of thinking. He said that Richard Nixon does more thinking because of the discipline he imposes on himself. We ought to think through where the Administration ought to go. <strong>He said that with one exception he will have no appointments on Sunday afternoons because he has missed enough football games already.</strong>"</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/">http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/rumsfeld_nixon_meeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donald Rumsfeld was right about everything, book by Rumsfeld claims</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Reviled two-time Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld has finally written his memoir. It is titled "Known and Unknown," after a typically obtuse quote he gave to the press while mismanaging the "global war on terrorism." In his memoir, Rumsfeld is settling various old scores, and, obviously, trying to convince everyone that he is not responsible for the various awful failures and fiascoes that occurred at the Pentagon during his tenure in the Bush administration. Like, for example, the whole "Iraq invasion and occupation" thing. <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/48749.html">According to Rumsfeld, he totally intended to do it right, but stupid President Bush wouldn't let him:</a></p><blockquote>
<p>Former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld says in a new book that he wanted to oversee the initial reconstruction of Iraq following the United States&#8217; invasion of the country but he was rebuffed by President George W. Bush.</p>
<p>"Bush didn&#8217;t cotton to the idea," Rumsfeld writes in his yet-to-be-released memoir Known and Unknown, excerpts of which were obtained by POLITICO.</p>
<p>"'What if we had a problem with North Korea?'" Bush asked, according to a scene that Rumsfeld said took place just before the 2003 invasion.</p>
<p>"'Well, Mr. President, if that happened,' I replied, 'I would come home immediately.' The President thought about that for a moment. Then he shook his head. 'No, Don, you need to be here.' I should have pressed the point harder."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/">http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/rumsfeld_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mark Salter, embittered McCain aide with &#8220;writer&#8217;s block,&#8221; wrote &#8220;O&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/mark_salter_o_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/mark_salter_o_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/27/mark_salter_o_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Mark Salter, the man who invented the myth of John McCain, <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2011/01/27/halperin-it-s-salter.aspx">wrote the book "O,"</a> according to <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/01/revealed-former-mccain-aide-is-anonymous-author-of-o-a-presidential-novel/70334/">people who care about who wrote the book "O."</a></p><p>"O" is an anonymous political novel about Barack Obama running for reelection in 2012. The book is a dramatic, insider's account of how the people who run presidential campaigns find Arianna Huffington annoying.</p><p>Speaking of annoying, this "news" was <a href="http://thepage.time.com/2011/01/27/o-mark-salter/#ixzz1CFEEmdBF">sort of broken by Mark Halperin,</a> though Salter has not confirmed it. (And why would he? The book has not been well-reviewed.)</p><p>There were some clues. Mark Salter fancies himself a literary type. He ghost-wrote John McCain's various books. "O's" opponent in the book is an honorable military type with no glaring and obvious personal flaws. (It is sort of McCain plus Romney, I guess. I have only skimmed it.) A Democrat might've written a book more critical of the way the Republican Party runs campaigns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/mark_salter_o_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/mark_salter_o_book/">http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/mark_salter_o_book/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/mark_salter_o_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/27/mark_salter_o_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michele Bachmann revealed: Gore Vidal made her a Republican</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/30/michele_bachmann_gore_vidal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/30/michele_bachmann_gore_vidal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 22:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann, R-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Historical Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/30/michele_bachmann_gore_vidal</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Every good conservative icon needs an origin story. The best ones -- the vast majority of them, if you believe them -- are former liberals, "lifelong Democrats," or even former Marxists. They become virulent right-wingers, usually, because of something horrible the Democrats did. Reagan was a Democrat -- and a union leader! -- until, in his formulation, "the party left me." (Around the time the party began supporting civil rights legislation, but that's neither here nor there.) But big events, or supposed betrayals, work best; 9/11 awoke the inner General Turgidson in every supposedly former liberal warblogger.</p><p>For Michele Bachmann, <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/12/bachmann-snotty-gore-vidal-novel-turned-me-republican-video.php?ref=fpi">it was historical fiction.</a></p><p>Yes, Michele Bachamnn was a liberal until she read Gore Vidal's "Burr." Bachmann tells the tale of her creation about five minutes into the clip: <object height="390" width="640"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0w0I1ulhtC8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0w0I1ulhtC8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/30/michele_bachmann_gore_vidal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every good conservative icon needs an origin story. The best ones &#8212; the vast majority of them, if you believe them &#8212; are former liberals, &#8220;lifelong Democrats,&#8221; or even former Marxists. They become virulent right-wingers, usually, because of something horrible the Democrats did. Reagan was a Democrat &#8212; and a union leader! &#8212; until, in his formulation, &#8220;the party left me.&#8221; (Around the time the party began supporting civil rights legislation, but that&#8217;s neither here nor there.) But big events, or supposed betrayals, work best; 9/11 awoke the inner General Turgidson in every supposedly former liberal warblogger.</p><p>For Michele Bachmann, <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/12/bachmann-snotty-gore-vidal-novel-turned-me-republican-video.php?ref=fpi">it was historical fiction.</a></p><p>Yes, Michele Bachamnn was a liberal until she read Gore Vidal&#8217;s &#8220;Burr.&#8221; Bachmann tells the tale of her creation about five minutes into the clip: <object height="390" width="640"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/0w0I1ulhtC8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/0w0I1ulhtC8&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/30/michele_bachmann_gore_vidal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/30/michele_bachmann_gore_vidal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>173</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are Bush&#8217;s book sales so great?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/bush_book_sales/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/bush_book_sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/28/bush_book_sales</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>According to Crown Publishing Group, George W. Bush's lightly plagiarized memoir "Decision Points" has already sold more than 2 million copies -- counting e-books -- since it went on sale in November. That's a lot! As Glynnis MacNicol points out, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/george-w-bushs-memoir-sells-more-copies-in-2-months-than-bill-clintons-sold-in-5-years-2010-12">that's almost as much as Bill Clinton's book has sold since it was released six years ago.</a></p><p>But ... why? Clinton left office with good approval ratings and was largely remembered fondly, especially as the Bush years dragged to their depressing end. Bill's also smart and articulate, and his administration's scandals tended to be more personal in nature than Bush's. In addition to being an awful communicator, Bush is famously reticent to reflect on his decisions, and in his book he's obviously relying on other people's written accounts of his presidency, which is ... a bit odd, to say the least.</p><p>But people are apparently eating it up, or at least they are paying money for it. Here are my theories:</p><p>
    <strong>His publisher is lying</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/bush_book_sales/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to Crown Publishing Group, George W. Bush&#8217;s lightly plagiarized memoir &#8220;Decision Points&#8221; has already sold more than 2 million copies &#8212; counting e-books &#8212; since it went on sale in November. That&#8217;s a lot! As Glynnis MacNicol points out, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/george-w-bushs-memoir-sells-more-copies-in-2-months-than-bill-clintons-sold-in-5-years-2010-12">that&#8217;s almost as much as Bill Clinton&#8217;s book has sold since it was released six years ago.</a></p><p>But &#8230; why? Clinton left office with good approval ratings and was largely remembered fondly, especially as the Bush years dragged to their depressing end. Bill&#8217;s also smart and articulate, and his administration&#8217;s scandals tended to be more personal in nature than Bush&#8217;s. In addition to being an awful communicator, Bush is famously reticent to reflect on his decisions, and in his book he&#8217;s obviously relying on other people&#8217;s written accounts of his presidency, which is &#8230; a bit odd, to say the least.</p><p>But people are apparently eating it up, or at least they are paying money for it. Here are my theories:</p><p>
    <strong>His publisher is lying</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/bush_book_sales/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/28/bush_book_sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>163</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin&#8217;s new book leaks to liberal blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/sarah_palin_new_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/sarah_palin_new_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/19/sarah_palin_new_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin's second book is due out next week. It is called "America by Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag," although if the leaked excerpts are any indication a lot of it seems to be "reflections on stuff Sarah Palin saw on TV."</p><p>Like "American Idol," which is a symbol of decadent liberal elitism. And, for some reason, <a href="http://gawker.com/5692353/sarah-palins-new-book-leaked-excerpts">"Murphy Brown,"</a> because <em>inviting</em> Dan Quayle comparisons is a really good idea. And <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20023381-503544.html">the films "Knocked Up," "Juno," and "The 40 Year Old Virgin,"</a> which Palin likes because they are pro-marriage and pro-babies, even though godless Hollywood liberal elites made them.</p><p>The book is also about how Levi Johnston is <em>still</em> a craven, awful monster. And babies Tripp and Trig are still little accidental angels that everyone is very happy were not aborted. And the Tea Parties are good and <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20023381-503544.html">Michelle Obama is an awful, embittered reverse-racist.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/sarah_palin_new_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin&#8217;s second book is due out next week. It is called &#8220;America by Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag,&#8221; although if the leaked excerpts are any indication a lot of it seems to be &#8220;reflections on stuff Sarah Palin saw on TV.&#8221;</p><p>Like &#8220;American Idol,&#8221; which is a symbol of decadent liberal elitism. And, for some reason, <a href="http://gawker.com/5692353/sarah-palins-new-book-leaked-excerpts">&#8220;Murphy Brown,&#8221;</a> because <em>inviting</em> Dan Quayle comparisons is a really good idea. And <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20023381-503544.html">the films &#8220;Knocked Up,&#8221; &#8220;Juno,&#8221; and &#8220;The 40 Year Old Virgin,&#8221;</a> which Palin likes because they are pro-marriage and pro-babies, even though godless Hollywood liberal elites made them.</p><p>The book is also about how Levi Johnston is <em>still</em> a craven, awful monster. And babies Tripp and Trig are still little accidental angels that everyone is very happy were not aborted. And the Tea Parties are good and <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20023381-503544.html">Michelle Obama is an awful, embittered reverse-racist.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/sarah_palin_new_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/sarah_palin_new_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

