<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Politico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/politico/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 17:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Allen&#8217;s bizarre attack on Conan O&#8217;Brien</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_allens_bizarre_attack_on_conan_obrien/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_allens_bizarre_attack_on_conan_obrien/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media critic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politico's star reporter takes umbrage over O'Brien's joke about a Washington hotel]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not insult the Washington Hilton in the presence of Mike Allen, or Politico's star reporter will launch a multi-day crusade against you in his widely read morning tip sheet.</p><p>Conan O'Brien made this mistake while emceeing the White House Correspondents Dinner. "You know, I was worried with the sequester that we would be forced to hold this event at less prestigious hotel than the D.C. Hilton -- then I was told that's not possible," O'Brien <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/28/conan-obriens-white-house-correspondents-dinner-speech-full_n_3174365.html">said</a> in a riff mocking the aging mid-century modern hotel in Washington's Dupont Circle.</p><p>Allen was not pleased. The scribe whose odd obsession with "influence" and Washington power inspired a legendary Mark Leibovich <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/25/magazine/25allen-t.html?pagewanted=all">profile</a> cried in <a href="http://www.politico.com/playbook/0413/playbook10548.html?ml=ae_l">Playbook Monday</a>, "Conan O’Brien hurt his buzz" by making "four baseless, elitist cracks about the Hilton, acting as if it were a Motel 5." Allen returned to the subject in <a href="http://www.politico.com/playbook/#.UX_ufk1zLPE.twitter">today's Playbook</a>, adding that on top of Conan's "bizarre, elitist attack on his hosts at the Washington Hilton," the comedian also eschewed the free room provided by the hotel to instead stay at the Four Seasons.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_allens_bizarre_attack_on_conan_obrien/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/mike_allens_bizarre_attack_on_conan_obrien/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All you need to know about #nerdprom &#8212; in 10 tweets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/all_you_need_to_know_about_nerdprom_in_10_tweets/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/all_you_need_to_know_about_nerdprom_in_10_tweets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conan O'Brien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzFeed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't waste your time reading about Washington's annual spectacle of self-love and debasement. Just read this]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="docs-internal-guid-6a725666-50c3-54db-2014-f7e178076d06" dir="ltr">What happened at this year's White House Correspondents Dinner was, by and large, what happens at every White House Correspondents Dinner. A quick tour through the hilarious and infuriating proceedings:</p><p dir="ltr"><strong>1). Lots of partygoers adopt the adorable term "nerdprom" for the night -- which you should roll your eyes at and be appropriately skeptical of:</strong></p><p>[embedtweet id="328327562331824128"]</p><p dir="ltr"><strong>2). People who most feel left out invariably throw a snit about the whole thing:</strong></p><p>[embedtweet id="328346466567479296"]</p><p>(Greg Mitchell posted <a href="http://gregmitchellwriter.blogspot.com/2013/04/sarah-palin-hypocrite-in-chief.html">four photos</a> of Palin from 2011’s “nerdprom.” Did she not get an invite this year? )</p><p dir="ltr"><strong>3). Conan O’Brien, a funnyman, was funny! Best joke:</strong></p><p>[embedtweet id="328341437341114370"]</p><p dir="ltr">(Watch entire video of O'Brien <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/watch_obama_and_conans_speeches_at_the_correspondents_dinner/">here</a>)</p><p dir="ltr"><strong>4). Barack Obama: Even funnier -- maybe because a slight contempt for the proceedings seems to come through:</strong></p><p>[embedtweet id="328475355407073280"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/all_you_need_to_know_about_nerdprom_in_10_tweets/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/all_you_need_to_know_about_nerdprom_in_10_tweets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Ricin letters are appearing around official Washington</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/ricin_found_in_senators_mail/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/ricin_found_in_senators_mail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ricin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington D.C.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: Obama has received tainted mail as well, but officials are zeroing in on a suspect]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE 4/17 12:20 p.m.</p><p>In his press conference, White House spokesman Jay Carney confirmed that a letter with a suspicious substance had been sent to President Obama but referred further questions to the FBI. He also referred questions about the Boston attack investigation to the FBI.</p><p>UPDATE 4/17 11:36 a.m.</p><p>The AP is <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/police_reportedly_have_suspect_in_ricin_case_ap/">reporting</a> that authorities have a suspect in mind but didn’t say much more:</p><blockquote><p>Police have a suspect in mind as they investigate a letter mailed to Sen. Roger Wicker that tested positive for poisonous ricin, a Senate colleague said.</p> <p>“The person that is a suspect writes a lot of letters to members,” Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said Tuesday as she emerged from a classified briefing.</p></blockquote><p>UPDATE: 4/17 11:28 a.m.</p><p>The president may have received one as well:</p><p>[embedtweet id="324542621190082560"]</p><p>[embedtweet id="324540615671050240"]</p><p>UPDATE: 4/17 10:50 a.m.</p><p>ABC News' Terry Moran tweeted:</p><p>[embedtweet id="324532498770059264"]</p><p>UPDATE No. 2: Politico is now reporting that a suspect in the case has been identified.</p><p>From Glenn Thrush:</p><p>[embedtweet id="324295535550943233"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/ricin_found_in_senators_mail/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/ricin_found_in_senators_mail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simpson and Bowles release lame &#8220;Simpson-Bowles&#8221; sequel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/simpson_and_bowles_release_lame_simpson_bowles_sequel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/simpson_and_bowles_release_lame_simpson_bowles_sequel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit hawks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simpson-Bowles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13205874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politico loves it, but the new Simpson-Bowles plan is just a waste of everyone's time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would you please do Erskine Bowles and Alan Simpson the courtesy of paying attention to their new Simpson-Bowles plan? Yes, today the two deficit vultures released the long-awaited sequel to their other plan, the famous "Simpson-Bowles Plan" (now officially to be referred to as "Simpson-Bowles Episode IV"). The original Simpson-Bowles plan <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/simpson_bowles_is_magic/">was incredibly popular despite the fact that its actual recommendations weren't supported by anyone,</a> including the people who always talked about how much they loved it.</p><p>This new plan got a big rollout sponsored by Politico, whose Mike Allen hosted and interviewed the pair this morning in Washington -- supporting Simpson-Bowles is not considered "biased" or "partisan" according to the usual rules of traditional journalistic objectivity -- but some <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2013/02/19/the_hecklers_who_ruins_simpson_and_bowles_s_breakfasts.html">mean hecklers interrupted them</a>. In a worrying sign for people for whom deficit reduction via earned benefits program cuts is a moral crusade, the heckler got a lot more attention on Twitter than the new Simpson-Bowles plan did. Can they recapture the magic? Or will this be like whatever gross stunt food product KFC put out after the Double Down, a pale imitation of a genuine phenomenon, doomed to be forgotten?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/simpson_and_bowles_release_lame_simpson_bowles_sequel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/simpson_and_bowles_release_lame_simpson_bowles_sequel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DC&#8217;s quest to silence Elizabeth Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/beltway_to_elizabeth_warren_shhh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/beltway_to_elizabeth_warren_shhh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13204722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the liberal star, DC's establishment perversely defines success as keeping her head down and not making waves]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To know that the Washington media manufactures narratives wholly divorced from pesky facts is to simply compare last week's <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/elizabeth-warrens-silent-senate-approach-87636.html">Politico article on freshman Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren</a> with the actions of the senator in the same week.</p><p>In a vacuum and without actual evidence, Politico declared that Warren has a "quiet plan" to become a "silent senator" - one who refuses to speak out on controversial issues and therefore creates an image for herself that is "a sharp departure from her rousing campaign and outspoken consumer advocacy." Yet, that very week, Warren showed she will likely be the opposite of a "silent senator." She did this by <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/warren-fights-for-the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-again-but-this-time-as-a-senator/2013/02/14/29b90304-7625-11e2-8f84-3e4b513b1a13_story.html">slamming</a> Republicans obstructing the nomination of a consumer regulator, publicly grilling negligent bank regulators and generally mustering a dominating performance at her very first committee hearing, thus generating national headlines.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/beltway_to_elizabeth_warren_shhh/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/beltway_to_elizabeth_warren_shhh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>128</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Hillary did next</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/what_hillary_did_next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/what_hillary_did_next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speaking circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harry walker agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13204921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taking a well-trodden path, the retired secretary of state will get paid six-figures to speak]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politico's Mike Allen <a href="http://www.politico.com/playbook/0213/playbook10052.html?hp=l6">scooped</a> the highly predictable news that Hillary Clinton would hit the paid speaking circuit having retired as secretary of state this month.</p><p>Clinton has chosen Harry Walker Agency (the same group who represent her husband to represent her) and is expected  to command fees well within the six-figure range — making her among the best-paid speakers “in the history of the circuit,” Allen reported.</p><p>Via Allen:</p><blockquote><p>Secretary Clinton will likely do some speeches for no fee for causes she champions, and expects to occasionally donate her fees for charitable purposes. Clinton, who will maintain her homes in Washington and Chappaqua, is also beginning to make decisions about the book she has said she will write, an account of her four years as secretary of State. Non-profit work will be another component of her new life, perhaps through her husband’s foundation or one of her own.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/what_hillary_did_next/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/18/what_hillary_did_next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary, coming to a theater near you?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_coming_to_a_theater_near_you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_coming_to_a_theater_near_you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood is abuzz over a screenplay that imagines the secretary of state as a 20-something at a crossroads ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton continues to recuperate from a blood clot, there’s some good news for her — presuming she has some Hollywood aspirations. <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/hillary-script-buzzing-in-hollywood-85696.html?hp=r11">Politico reports today</a> on the screenplay "Rodham," one that ranked on last year’s Black List poll of Hollywood types on the best unproduced scripts.</p><p>While there’s no guarantee that "Rodham" will be made (and while its existence isn’t exactly new — <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2012/12/18/hillary_clinton_movie_rodham_by_screenwriter_young_il_kim_will_it_get_made.html">Slate reported on Young Il Kim’s screenplay last month</a>), the Politico brief is evidence of a level of public interest in Secretary Clinton that's high even by the usual standard.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_coming_to_a_theater_near_you/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_coming_to_a_theater_near_you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hack List No. 1: Politico</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_1_politico/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_1_politico/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim VandeHei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Hack List]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack List 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Home of the campaign's loudest, least essential journalism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>This year, my annual list of the worst of political media highlights not just individuals, but the institutions that enable those individuals. The 2012 Hack List will be counting down the 10 media outlets that are hurting America over the next two days -- stay tuned! (Previous Hack List entries <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the-hack-list/">here</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/salon_hack_list_2011/">here</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/22/war_room_hack_list_intro/">here.</a>)</em></p><p>Surprise! It's Politico.</p><p>I have <a href="http://www.thebaffler.com/past/come_on_feel_the_buzz">written tens of thousands of words</a> on what, precisely, is wrong with Politico. But I can put the case much more simply here: It's Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_1_politico/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/hack_list_no_1_politico/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Revenge of the GOP billionaires</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/revenge_of_the_gop_billionaires/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/revenge_of_the_gop_billionaires/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch Brothers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sheldon Adelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Kochs and Adelsons haven't learned their lesson from the 2012 election. They'll just spend more in 2016]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep hearing that the billionaires and big corporations that poured all that money into the 2012 election learned their lesson. They lost their shirts and won’t do it again.</p><p>Don’t believe that for an instant.</p><p>It’s true their political investments didn’t exactly pay off this time around.</p><p>“Right now there is stunned disbelief that Republicans fared so poorly after all the money they invested,” said Brent Bozell, president of For America, an Alexandria-based nonprofit that advocates for Christian values in politics.</p><p>“Congrats to @KarlRove on blowing $400 million this cycle,” Donald Trump tweeted. “Every race @CrossroadsGPS ran ads in, the Republicans lost. What a waste of money.”</p><p>Rove’s two giant political funds — American Crossroads (a Super PAC) and Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies (a so-called nonprofit “social welfare organization” that doesn’t have to report its donors) — backed Mitt Romney with $127 million spent on more than 82,000 television spots. Rove’s groups spent another $51 million on House and Senate races. Ten of the 12 Senate candidates they supported lost.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/revenge_of_the_gop_billionaires/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/12/revenge_of_the_gop_billionaires/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politico flunks economics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/politico_flunks_economics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/politico_flunks_economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jared Bernstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D.C.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13122152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new piece examining how to spark the economy reveals how stale conventional wisdom in D.C. really is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this Politico <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/crafting-a-boom-economy-84878.html" target="_blank">piece</a> about how to get the economy growing in earnest again, I was struck by how out of sync the conventional/DC story is compared to what I and other growth analysts think is going on (h/t: DS).</p><p>Here’s the agenda:</p><blockquote><p>…tax reform that goes way beyond individuals and rates; much deeper Social Security and Medicare changes than currently envisioned; quick movement on trade agreements, including a proposed one with Europe; an energy policy that exploits the oil and gas boom; and allowing foreign-born students with science expertise to stay here and start businesses.</p> <p>Do this and there could be not an economic recovery — but a boom, many argue.</p></blockquote><p>Really?  I gotta say, I don’t see it.  In fact, pretty much everything on that list is a) conventional wisdom in DC and b) largely a distraction from where I think the evidence is actually pointing, as I’ll stress in a moment.  To be clear, raising more tax revenues and slowing health care costs are critical in terms of getting our long-term debt situation under control, and immigration reform that provides a path for folks here to stay is also <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/immigration-and-efficiency/" target="_blank">a great idea</a>.  A domestic energy boom is already underway and trade agreements do squat for growth (which doesn’t mean they’re not worth it—but their growth potential is hugely overhyped).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/politico_flunks_economics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/11/politico_flunks_economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nate Silver: Politico is dumb</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/nate_silver_politico_is_dumb/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/nate_silver_politico_is_dumb/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Simmons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Bill Simmons' podcast, Silver says the site tries to cover politics like sports, "but not in an intelligent way"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe Scarborough has <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/joe_scarborough_to_nate_silver_im_sorry/">apologized</a> to Nate Silver. But it looks like the stats guru would still like a word with the folks at Politico.</p><p>In an appearance <a href="http://espn.go.com/espnradio/play?id=8693517">on Bill Simmons' The BS Report podcast</a> today, Silver took aim at the site, which dismissed him as a "one-term celebrity" in an <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/10/nate-silver-romney-clearly-could-still-win-147618.html">article</a> prior to the election. (Turns out Silver correctly called all 50 states for the second presidential election in a row.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/nate_silver_politico_is_dumb/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/nate_silver_politico_is_dumb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politico: Women, blacks, Latinos and young people don&#8217;t count</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/politico_women_blacks_latinos_and_young_people_dont_count/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/politico_women_blacks_latinos_and_young_people_dont_count/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women Voters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062954</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For Mike Allen and Jim VendeHei, these groups are just part of a dangerously limited coalition of Obama supporters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> It goes without question that, if President Obama wins reelection, he will have done so with one of the most diverse coalitions ever assembled by a major party nominee. He will have won large majorities of women, young people, African Americans, Latinos and Asian Americans.</p><p>To most observers, this narrow majority of voters represents a broad cross-section of the country. To <em>Politico</em>’s Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei, it’s a dangerously limited coalition. Why? Because it doesn’t <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=A01BF198-18DC-4E9A-9686-C29F615E0AF3">include</a> enough white people, and particularly, downscale white men:</p><blockquote><p>If President Barack Obama wins, he will be the popular choice of Hispanics, African-Americans, single women and highly educated urban whites. That’s what the polling has consistently shown in the final days of the campaign. It looks more likely than not that he will lose independents, and it’s possible he will get a lower percentage of white voters than George W. Bush got of Hispanic voters in 2000.</p> <p>A broad mandate this is not.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/politico_women_blacks_latinos_and_young_people_dont_count/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/politico_women_blacks_latinos_and_young_people_dont_count/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey, hacks: Nate Silver&#8217;s not taking your job</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/dont_be_scared_of_number_wizard_nate_silver_pundits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/dont_be_scared_of_number_wizard_nate_silver_pundits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Scarborough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[math]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pundits appear especially threatened by the New York Times math wiz this election cycle. Why are they so scared?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of issues dividing the nation as we approach the long-overdue end of this endless campaign season, the raging War on Nate Silver is not as big a deal as, say, the war on poor people and minorities having their votes counted, or the fact that thousands of people on the Eastern seaboard have no power or, in far too many places, food. But it is one of the more entertaining diversions of the feverish week before Election Day. In short: Conservatives are outraged at Silver for "predicting" an Obama victory, and nonpartisan (but fiercely ideological) political press elites are all chuckling at his curious notion that fancy math can be used to determine what is most likely to happen in an election.</p><p>Nate Silver does not actually need his army of defenders. He is a wildly successful author and New York Times contributor with a huge audience, and he is <a href="http://www.theawl.com/2012/11/now-nate-silver-is-just-laughing-at-you">smart and witty enough to fight his own battles.</a> I also realize that any defense of Silver plays into the savvy politico notion that liberals are irrationally <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/rosiegray/why-liberals-cling-to-nate-silver">"clinging"</a> to his projections because they are terrified of uncertainty and Mitt Romney's ineffable momentum.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/dont_be_scared_of_number_wizard_nate_silver_pundits/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/dont_be_scared_of_number_wizard_nate_silver_pundits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politico takes on &#8220;conspiracy theories,&#8221; including various real non-conspiracy things</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/politico_takes_on_conspiracy_theories_including_various_real_non_conspiracy_things/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/politico_takes_on_conspiracy_theories_including_various_real_non_conspiracy_things/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conspiracy theorists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13052011</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reporter Ginger Gibson dismisses them as conspiracy theorists -- even those with real fears about voter suppression]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/82848.html">Politico reporter Ginger Gibson today ribs people</a> who are actually invested in the result of the election as opposed to interested solely in the elaborate game of Stratego that is the campaign. Apparently partisans are all going around spreading crazy conspiracy theories about their opponents.</p><blockquote><p>As the use of Twitter has exploded in the 2012 campaign, coupled with more expansive use of Facebook and other social networks, the rumble of extreme partisans propagating strange conspiracy theories is getting louder.</p></blockquote><p>Those silly partisans and their silly conspiracy theories! The resolutely nonpartisan and hence perfectly clear-eyed reporters at Politico have your number. You are all claiming that bad things will happen if the "other guy" wins the election, when everyone knows that no matter who wins things will be fine, that is what American history has taught us. (??) Also conspiracy theories spread because of "Twitter" and "Facebook." (???)</p><p>Hey, what is the best way to make sure this column reads like it was written by an old person a decade ago and then buried underground until this week? Something like this, probably:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/politico_takes_on_conspiracy_theories_including_various_real_non_conspiracy_things/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/politico_takes_on_conspiracy_theories_including_various_real_non_conspiracy_things/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can we stop lies from becoming &#8220;facts&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/can_we_stop_lies_from_becoming_facts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/can_we_stop_lies_from_becoming_facts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dartmouth College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misinformation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13030614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using strategies like "de-biasing," scientists are working on concrete methods to prevent the spread of false info]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recurring red herring in the current presidential campaign is the verity of President Barack Obama's birth certificate. Although the president has made this document public, and records of his 1961 birth in Honolulu have been corroborated by newspaper announcements, a vocal segment of the population continues to insist that Obama's birth certificate proving U.S. citizenship is a fraud, making him legally ineligible to be president. <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0211/49554.html">A <em>Politico </em>survey</a> found that a majority of voters in the 2011 Republican primary shared this clearly false belief.</p><p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a>vScientific issues can be just as vulnerable to misinformation campaigns. Plenty of people still believe that <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=vaccines">vaccines</a> cause autism and that human-caused climate change is a hoax. Science has thoroughly debunked these myths, but the misinformation persists in the face of overwhelming evidence. Straightforward efforts to combat the lies may backfire as well. A paper published on September 18 in <em>Psychological Science in the Public Interest </em>(<em>PSPI</em>) says that efforts to fight the problem frequently have the opposite effect.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/can_we_stop_lies_from_becoming_facts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/can_we_stop_lies_from_becoming_facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Donald Rumsfeld, the media&#8217;s original weird political sex symbol</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/donald_rumsfeld_the_medias_original_weird_political_sex_symbol/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/donald_rumsfeld_the_medias_original_weird_political_sex_symbol/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13028343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This year it's Joe Biden, but the press used to love Rummy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Politico has a silly piece today about how Joe Biden, America's wacky vice president, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/81912.html?hp=t1">is a "sex symbol,"</a> or at least he likes to flirt with ladies on the campaign trail, like lots of personally charismatic politicians do. It is an intentionally silly, jokey story, which is fine, let people have their fun I say. But, ha ha, the conservatives don't care for this "Joe Biden is sexy" nonsense, no sir.</p><p><a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/politico-investigates-joe-biden-sex-symbol_653398.html">At the Weekly Standard, Daniel Halper gets very sarcastic with Politico</a>, as does <a href="http://weaselzippers.us/2012/10/02/politico-hey-this-joe-biden-guy-is-quite-the-sex-symbol/">the Weasel Zipper person</a>. Conservatives <a href="https://twitter.com/charliespiering/statuses/253186681979695105?tw_i=253186681979695105&amp;tw_e=details&amp;tw_p=tweetembed">on Twitter</a> are <a href="https://twitter.com/AlexPappasDC/status/253187289440727040">similarly</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/mkhammer/status/253188065466654720">unimpressed.</a> The "Fox Nation" headline: <a href="http://nation.foxnews.com/joe-biden/2012/10/02/left-wing-politico-calls-biden-sex-symbol">"Left-Wing Politico Calls Biden a 'Sex Symbol.'"</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/donald_rumsfeld_the_medias_original_weird_political_sex_symbol/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/donald_rumsfeld_the_medias_original_weird_political_sex_symbol/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House confirms China hack</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/white_house_confirms_china_hack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/white_house_confirms_china_hack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Free Beacon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13026614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Right-wing site reports cyber attack on sensitive U.S. information, but officials insist no harm done]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Sunday night, conservative news site the Washington Free Beacon <a href="http://freebeacon.com/white-house-hack-attack/">reported </a>that "hackers linked to China’s government broke into one of the U.S. government’s most sensitive computer networks, breaching a system used by the White House Military Office for nuclear commands."</p><p>Within hours, the White House had contacted Politico (without solicitation) to <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1012/81847.html?hp=l5">confirm but downplay</a> the report.</p><p>The Free Beacon suggested that the hack may have compromised sensitive information that could be used "during a future conflict to intercept presidential communications, locate the president for targeting purposes, or disrupt strategic command and control by the president to U.S. forces in both the United States and abroad."</p><p>However, the White House volunteered to Politico that no harm had been done:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/white_house_confirms_china_hack/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/white_house_confirms_china_hack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Politico: Politico stories don&#8217;t matter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/politico_politico_stories_dont_matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/politico_politico_stories_dont_matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Allen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13016909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei helpfully explain that Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei aren't worth paying attention to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=A4D3BAE8-0D5F-45FC-BEFD-4CB05D937D2D">There is a new story</a> by Mike Allen, Politico star reporter and <a href="http://gawker.com/5521121/dcs-most-influential-reporter-cannot-name-a-single-hobby-on-the-record">man who is unable to name a single recreational activity he enjoys</a>, and his boss, Politico co-founder Jim VandeHei. According to this story, the last big VandeHei and Allen story -- one published three days prior to this one -- doesn't matter.</p><p>They explicitly say so. The new story is about Mitt Romney's new plan to rescue his campaign with more personal appearances and ads. (His previous strategy, I guess, was just <em>not</em> do any campaigning.) At the end of the story there is a recap of bad things that have happened to the Romney campaign over the last 10 days, divided into "What Does Matter" and "What Doesn't Matter." Here is my favorite entry in "What Doesn't Matter":</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/politico_politico_stories_dont_matter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/politico_politico_stories_dont_matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bibi campaigns on Florida airwaves</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/bibi_campaigns_on_florida_airwaves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/bibi_campaigns_on_florida_airwaves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 11:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benjamin Netanyahu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13016693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new ad in Florida features only the Israeli prime minister warning about a nuclear Iran]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is getting in on campaign ad season, spreading his hawkish message on Iran across Florida. Using campaign ad format, a clip hitting airwaves Friday features only the prime minister warning of an imminent nuclear Iran.</p><p>As Politico's Maggie Haberman <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/09/netanyahu-ad-to-debut-in-florida-136034.html?hp=r13">reported</a> Thursday:</p><blockquote><p>The spot is the work of a c4 called Secure America Now - which, thanks to its tax status, doesn't have to disclose its donors.</p> <p>A Republican involved with the project said its airing in Miami, West Palm Beach and Ft. Myers. The flight is ultimately going to be $1 million, the official said - a media-tracking source said about $400,000 has been placed so far. Those markets house some of the state's largest Jewish communities.</p></blockquote><p>The ad, setting Bibi's apocalyptic predictions against ominous music, makes no reference to Mitt Romney, for whom the Israeli P.M. showed support earlier this year but "distanced himself a bit from" during U.S. television appearances last weekend, noted Haberman.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/bibi_campaigns_on_florida_airwaves/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/bibi_campaigns_on_florida_airwaves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oh no, the Democrats are &#8220;Kerry-izing&#8221; Romney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/oh_no_the_democrats_are_kerry_izing_romney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/oh_no_the_democrats_are_kerry_izing_romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2004 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13008017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to Politico, "Kerry-izing" means saying Mitt has no clue on foreign policy, not "lying about his record"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would have thought an attempted "Kerry-ization" of a candidate -- referring to the treatment of Sen. John Kerry by the Republicans and the press in 2004 -- would involve a coordinated campaign of lies and misinformation, but <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=535C2E5C-F14D-486F-A9E4-B78428305F14">according to Mike Allen and Jim VandeHei it just means "saying he doesn't have a foreign policy."</a></p><p>Allen and VandeHei, Politico's mascot and co-founder, have yet another one of their bizarre, needlessly lengthy (especially needless because they just repeat the same points over and over again ...) news articles that are also lengthy throat-clearing "state of the race" pieces that rehash the very obvious observations of D.C. reporters covering this race. (<a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0512/76898.html">Some of these articles</a> also double as opinion pieces about how mean and unfair the press and the Democrats are being to Mitt Romney.)</p><p>So, sure, it is at this point a truism that this election resembles 2004 in that the incumbent president has an advantage on "national security" issues and the challenger is perceived as rich and out of touch. So obviously the Democrats are now doing exactly what they accused the Other Side of doing, before:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/oh_no_the_democrats_are_kerry_izing_romney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/oh_no_the_democrats_are_kerry_izing_romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>