<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 18:27:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>David Petraeus can’t lose (unless he goes to jail)!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/david_petraeus_paid_a_lot_of_money_for_being_david_petraeus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/david_petraeus_paid_a_lot_of_money_for_being_david_petraeus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Private equity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13349310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former general and CIA chief is set to make a small fortune from a public university for no reason]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Petraeus, the supposedly brilliant former commander of United States Armed Forces in Iraq and Afghanistan, landed on his feet after resigning as head of the CIA following a ridiculous sex scandal: The City University of New York is paying him <a href="http://gawker.com/cuny-is-paying-david-petraeus-200-000-to-work-three-ho-604712137?utm_campaign=socialflow_gawker_twitter&amp;utm_source=gawker_twitter&amp;utm_medium=socialflow">$150,000 to lead some seminars and maybe do a couple of lectures.</a> (He was originally offered $200,000, "supplemented by funds [as yet to be secured] from a private gift." No explanation was given for the pay cut.)</p><p>CUNY's <a href="http://www.cuny.edu/about/history.html">history dates back to the 19th century Free Academy</a>, a school whose mission was to "educate the whole people." Baccalaureate degrees were offered without any cost for most of the university's history, until quite recently. Now, at CUNY as at most American universities, tuition is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/29/nyregion/cuny-board-approves-tuition-increases.html">rising,</a> yearly and inexorably. (Gov. Andrew Cuomo signed a bill in 2010 giving the university the authority to raise tuition without New York State Legislative approval.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/david_petraeus_paid_a_lot_of_money_for_being_david_petraeus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/07/02/david_petraeus_paid_a_lot_of_money_for_being_david_petraeus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s split personality: Paranoid superstate and land of equality</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/americas_split_personality_paranoid_superstate_and_land_of_equality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/americas_split_personality_paranoid_superstate_and_land_of_equality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Toobin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security Agency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistle-blower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13340668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From "The Heat" to "White House Down," from Snowden to gay rights, America plays both hero and villain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the close of one of the most momentous news weeks in recent history – with a historic step forward for <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/marriage_equality/" target="_blank">marriage equality,</a> a historic disembowelment of <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/voting_rights/" target="_blank">voting rights</a> and the United States coming off like an incompetent supervillain in the hunt for <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/edward_snowden" target="_blank">Edward Snowden</a> – we’re faced once again with utterly confusing signals about what kind of country we live in. A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/from_ike_to_the_matrix_welcome_to_the_american_dystopia/" target="_blank">deepening similarities</a> between our society and the imagined dystopias of “1984” and “Brave New World,” but it’s important to acknowledge that that isn’t the whole story. At the same time, American society remains immensely dynamic, and has become far more diverse and tolerant over the last several decades. I know this is a metaphorical misuse of a clinical term that refers to a serious and complex mental disorder, but at least in the old-fashioned, split-personality sense of the word, America is schizophrenic. For that matter, I’m not so sure we can rule out the clinical mental disorder either.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/americas_split_personality_paranoid_superstate_and_land_of_equality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/americas_split_personality_paranoid_superstate_and_land_of_equality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;White House Down&#8221;: Destroying America in order to save it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/white_house_down_destroying_america_in_order_to_save_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/white_house_down_destroying_america_in_order_to_save_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Down]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland Emmerich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Channing Tatum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Foxx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13339020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Channing Tatum saves Jamie Foxx's peacemaking black president from a right-wing coup in "White House Down"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As gristly, undigested globs of American fear, American hope and semi-justified American paranoia go, <a href="http://www.whitehousedown.com/">“White House Down”</a> is both highly entertaining and perfectly timed (in a way that can only be accidental). This ripping and ridiculous yarn from disaster-movie king Roland Emmerich (he of “Independence Day,” <a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/11/13/2012_2/‎" target="_blank">“2012,”</a> etc.) is about a right-wing coup d’état staged against an African-American president who has vowed to take down the “military-industrial complex.” No, seriously! And he kind of says it like it’s a new idea! All in all, the movie is something like an MSNBC remake of “Die Hard” mixed with “Les Misérables” (minus the singing) mixed with a wishful-thinking version of Barack Obama in which he personally takes out Serbians and white supremacists with an RPG. Oh, and just a little bit of “Home Alone in the White House.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/white_house_down_destroying_america_in_order_to_save_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/28/white_house_down_destroying_america_in_order_to_save_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Ike to &#8220;The Matrix&#8221;: Welcome to the American dystopia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/from_ike_to_the_matrix_welcome_to_the_american_dystopia/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/from_ike_to_the_matrix_welcome_to_the_american_dystopia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1984]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Orwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aldous Huxley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brave New World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13327374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part Orwellian security state, part Huxley wonderland and part "Matrix," America is three dystopias in one!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American society has been sliding toward the realm of dystopian science fiction -- toward a nightmarish mishmash of George Orwell, Aldous Huxley and <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/philip_k_dick‎" target="_blank">Philip K. Dick</a> -- since at least the early years of the Reagan administration, and arguably a lot longer than that. (Since Watergate? The Kennedy assassination? The A-bomb? Take your pick.) We may have finally gotten there. We live in a country that embodies three different dystopian archetypes at once: America is partly a panopticon surveillance-and-security state, as in Orwell, partly an anesthetic and amoral consumer wonderland, as in Huxley, and partly a grand rhetorical delusion or “spectacle,” as in Dick or <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_matrix" target="_blank">“The Matrix”</a> or <a href="http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/debord/‎" target="_blank">certain currents</a> of French philosophy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/from_ike_to_the_matrix_welcome_to_the_american_dystopia/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/from_ike_to_the_matrix_welcome_to_the_american_dystopia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>114</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deaths exceed births among white Americans for first time ever</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/deaths_exceed_births_for_first_time_among_non_hispanic_white_americans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/deaths_exceed_births_for_first_time_among_non_hispanic_white_americans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethnicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White people]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Demographers say non-Hispanic whites will be a minority in America by 2050]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were more recorded deaths than births among non-Hispanic white Americans for the first time in 2012, according to a new <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/06/13/minority-census-population/2417413/" target="_blank">analysis</a> of Census Bureau estimates.</p><p>The difference was tiny -- there were just 12,400 more deaths than births -- but part of a significant trend toward greater diversity in the United States; demographers predict that white Americans will become a statistical minority by 2050.</p><p>Growing racial and ethnic diversity means that immigrants and young people of color will be in large part subsidizing America's aging population, as USA Today <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/06/13/minority-census-population/2417413/" target="_blank">notes</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/deaths_exceed_births_for_first_time_among_non_hispanic_white_americans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/deaths_exceed_births_for_first_time_among_non_hispanic_white_americans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Dirty Wars&#8221; &#8212; and a soiled presidency</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/obamas_dirty_wars_and_a_soiled_presidency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/obamas_dirty_wars_and_a_soiled_presidency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anwar al-Awlaki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dirty wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Scahill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Greenwald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13320549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reporter Jeremy Scahill's riveting film helps explain how the "transformational presidency" turned to nightmare]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what it’s come to for Barack Obama: Reality has sunk in for many Americans, who at last understand that the guy we elected on the naive expectation that he would undo the excesses of the Bush-Cheney national security state has instead made them much worse. It will be difficult, if not impossible, for Obama to escape this legacy now. He is the drone president, the assassination president, the domestic-surveillance president, whose entire administration has a professionalized passion for secrecy that makes the low-rent paranoids of the Nixon White House look like Keystone Kops. I did not suspect that I would ever again find an occasion to quote a Sarah Palin gag line, but hey: How <em>is</em> that hopey-changey stuff workin’ out for ya?</p><p>There are numerous ways of understanding this disheartening turn of events. Maybe the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/01/20/obamas-inauguration-bush-_n_159316.html">secret note</a> that George W. Bush left in the top drawer of the Resolute desk on Jan. 20, 2009, contained a “Manchurian Candidate”-style code word that switched on the programming! Or maybe, somewhat more plausibly, the entire secret apparatus of American counterterrorism at home and abroad has become an independent and self-replicating organism, a Hydra-headed monster that can’t be killed. The president himself indirectly took that tack on Friday, when he tackled questions about the surveillance revelations for the first time, during a supposedly unrelated press conference.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/obamas_dirty_wars_and_a_soiled_presidency/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/obamas_dirty_wars_and_a_soiled_presidency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>130</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How powerful elites divide the rest of us</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/crush_elites_carefully_maintained_status_quo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/crush_elites_carefully_maintained_status_quo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[activists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[401K]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill McKibben]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmentalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telecommunications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13319675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The split between political junkies and everyone else stifles meaningful activism. Here's how to break out of it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the complaints you often hear from political organizers is the one about silos. As the lament goes, too many organizations are trapped in specific single-issue silos and are therefore unable to work in any coordinated fashion as part of a larger movement. It's a fair criticism, but it misses an even bigger obstacle to achieving lasting change: the vast divide between political junkies and Everyone Else.</p><p>On the political junkie side of this chasm are those of us who follow politics and social issues closely. We typically get our information through niche media, email newsletters, membership organizations and the attendant social media feeds. The media that serves this audience seems perfectly happy to commodify dissent by providing niche content that speaks only to a narrow audience -- and nobody else. To many looking in from the outside, that creates the image of a holier-than-thou insularity that is, to say the least, off putting. Ultimately, from within this bubble, "activism" becomes narrowly defined as a grinding project of political work trying to somehow convince A) politicians to do things their donors don't want them to do or B) the larger politically disengaged world to do stuff that can seem too difficult (door knocking, phone banking, etc.) or wholly futile (signing petitions, sending a letter to a lawmaker, etc.).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/crush_elites_carefully_maintained_status_quo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/crush_elites_carefully_maintained_status_quo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>College Republicans&#8217; plan for GOP rebranding: Seem tolerant!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/college_republicans_help_out_with_gop_rebanding_effort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/college_republicans_help_out_with_gop_rebanding_effort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13315475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The branch of the conservative movement that bred the party's scummiest strategists urges a softer sell]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the College Republican National Committee is releasing a report, based on a poll and focus groups, examining how and why the Republican Party lost the under-30 vote and what they could do to win it back. Spoiler: They will have to become an entirely different party with entirely different positions. Though that is sort of my interpretation of their findings. The College Republicans are still pretty sure it's primarily a problem of "messaging."</p><p>The report, <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=47D81FDF-F698-468B-A4B4-004B8005129B">according to Politico's summary</a>, covers much of the same ground as the Reince Priebus-ordered RNC report on the troubles of the Republican Party released earlier this year. Politico sums up the findings with the following bullet points:</p><blockquote><p><strong>Gay marriage:</strong> “On the ‘open-minded’ issue … [w]e will face serious difficulty so long as the issue of gay marriage remains on the table.”</p> <p><strong>Hispanics:</strong> “Latino voters … tend to think the GOP couldn’t care less about them.”</p> <p><strong>Perception of the party’s economic stance:</strong> “We’ve become the party that will pat you on your back when you make it, but won’t offer you a hand to help you get there.”</p> <p><strong>Big reason for the image problem:</strong> The “outrageous statements made by errant Republican voices.”</p> <p><strong>Words that up-for-grabs voters associate with the GOP:</strong> “The responses were brutal: closed-minded, racist, rigid, old-fashioned.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/college_republicans_help_out_with_gop_rebanding_effort/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/college_republicans_help_out_with_gop_rebanding_effort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Class war comes to the multiplex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/class_war_comes_to_the_multiplex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/class_war_comes_to_the_multiplex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[now you see me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bling Ring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The East]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[V for Vendetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wachowskis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sofia Coppola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse Eisenberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Woody Harrelson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mark ruffalo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13314198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From magical bank heists to anarchist attacks to Paris Hilton's Manolos, the movies go where "real" politics can't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the brainless but intermittently entertaining heist movie <a href="http://www.nowyouseememovie.com/">“Now You See Me,”</a> a quartet of magicians played by Jesse Eisenberg, Woody Harrelson, Isla Fisher and Dave Franco (younger brother of James) pull off an elaborate stunt that appears to violate the laws of physics and numerous other written and unwritten laws as well. After claiming to teleport a French audience member back home with a magical helmet, they then vacuum up millions of euros in cash from the vault of a Parisian bank and shower them, seconds later, upon their Las Vegas audience. Back in the land of escargots, when bank officials open the vault, nothing is left but a playing card signed by the supposed teleportee.</p><p>I’m not spoiling much of anything in telling you that the magic trick is an illusion: The money was in Vegas the whole time, and Monsieur le Teleport never went anywhere. Then again, “Now You See Me” is a kind of illusion or inversion as well. For one thing, it’s a fantasy in which tourists depart Las Vegas with more money than they started with. It’s a movie that plays with dangerous notions of class warfare, payback and redistribution of wealth – with the ancient concept, in fact, of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jubilee_(Christianity)">Jubilee,</a> a celebration in which slaves and prisoners are set free and debts are forgiven – and then assures us that it was just kidding, and that in America redemption is always an individual matter.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/class_war_comes_to_the_multiplex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/01/class_war_comes_to_the_multiplex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eric Holder is sorry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/eric_holder_is_sorry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/eric_holder_is_sorry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 16:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Department of Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13310901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The attorney general's "remorse," sincere or not, is at least a sign that the administration knows better]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Holder feels bad. The attorney general of the United States has been criticized quite a bit since basically the day he was announced as Obama's pick for the job, but lately that criticism has come from liberals, who are upset with the Justice Department for excessive snooping on journalists. Holder, <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/28/holder-s-regrets-and-repairs.html">according to Daniel Klaidman in the Daily Beast,</a> now feels really personally sorry about the whole treating reporters like criminals thing, because he still thinks of himself as a good liberal.</p><p>Holder signed off on the search warrant issued for Fox News reporter James Rosen. The warrant justified seizing Rosen's records by claiming that his handling of his source, a State Department contractor, may have constituted a violation of the Espionage Act. The AG apparently did not feel bad about this until he read in a newspaper that he had done so:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/eric_holder_is_sorry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/eric_holder_is_sorry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP actually bullies an anti-bullying bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/gop_actually_bullies_an_anti_bullying_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/gop_actually_bullies_an_anti_bullying_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Minnesota safe schools initiative dies after right balks, and local archdiocese calls it an "Orwellian nightmare"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Minnesota. Nearly three years after Anoka High School student <a href="http://www.queerty.com/teenager-justin-aaberg-killed-himself-over-gay-bullying-his-mom-wont-let-anyone-forget-20100914/">Justin Aaberg hanged himself</a> after allegedly being subjected to anti-gay harassment, state Republicans seem to have decided that bullying is no longer a problem. The Pioneer-Press reports Monday that an anti-bullying bill has been withdrawn <a href="http://www.twincities.com/education/ci_23281147/minnesota-senate-anti-bullying-bill-pulled-after-gop">"after Republicans said they planned 10 hours of debate on the issue."</a></p><p>Using mean, aggressive measures to get your way over a <em>bullying</em> bill? Anyone else feel <a href="http://youtu.be/8v9yUVgrmPY">an Alanis Morissette verse</a> coming on?</p><p>After Aaberg's death -- just one of many high-profile 2010 LGBT suicides that made bullying a national issue -- Sen. Al Franken made a strong push for tougher, clearer legislation to protect students. <a href="http://www.alfranken.com/pages/civil_rights/">"No student should have to dread going to school because they fear being bullied,"</a> he said. "It’s clear that we need to do more to ensure schools are a safe environment for all students. Ending this bullying and harassment in schools will be a priority for education reform in the next Congress."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/gop_actually_bullies_an_anti_bullying_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/gop_actually_bullies_an_anti_bullying_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lax state rules enable attack ads</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/lax_state_rules_enable_attack_ads_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/lax_state_rules_enable_attack_ads_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 04:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Center for Public Integrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State-level nonprofits, super PACs fly under the radar]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.publicintegrity.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/center-500px-logo-e1365812656958.jpg" alt="The Center for Public Integrity" align="left" /></a>While much criticism has been lobbed at the federal system for failing to adequately identify who is spending money to influence campaigns, 35 states have independent spending disclosure laws that are less stringent than federal election law.</p><p>In fact, in 30 states it’s impossible to total how much money outside groups are spending on campaigns, information that is mostly available when it comes to federal contests.</p><p>That’s according to a new 50-state analysis by the <a href="http://www.followthemoney.org/">National Institute on Money in State Politics</a>, which graded the states on disclosure requirements for super PACs, nonprofits and other outside spending groups.</p><p>Fifteen states — Alaska, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Rhode Island, Texas, Washington and Wisconsin — received an “A” grade, meaning the states’ laws were at least as robust as federal independent spending requirements.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/lax_state_rules_enable_attack_ads_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/lax_state_rules_enable_attack_ads_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the GOP cast Obama as Gatsby (minus the parties)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/how_the_gop_cast_obama_as_gatsby_minus_the_parties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/how_the_gop_cast_obama_as_gatsby_minus_the_parties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Great Gatsby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[great gatsby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baz luhrmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonardo DiCaprio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F. Scott Fitzgerald]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He's a flawed, handsome idealist with a puzzling life story, hounded by his enemies as a sinister outsider]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the biggest differences between F. Scott Fitzgerald’s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0743273567/?tag=saloncom08-20">“The Great Gatsby”</a> and Baz Luhrmann’s overblown new <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_great_gatsby‎">movie version,</a> as <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/movies/2013/05/the-great-gatsby-a-voice-of-degeneration.html">Richard Brody</a> of the New Yorker has pointed out, is that Fitzgerald’s book was (among many other things) a work of prescient social criticism, published at the very height of the Roaring '20s boom, whose dark side he saw so clearly. A few years later, the stock market crash and the ensuing Great Depression would smash all the champagne glasses, exposing the Gatsby-scaled dream of ever-widening affluence (which was only ever available to white Americans above the poverty class) as a mass delusion.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/how_the_gop_cast_obama_as_gatsby_minus_the_parties/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/11/how_the_gop_cast_obama_as_gatsby_minus_the_parties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guantánamo: It&#8217;s Obama&#8217;s disgrace now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/guantanamo_its_obamas_disgrace_now/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/guantanamo_its_obamas_disgrace_now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guantanamo hunger strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hunger Strike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13289365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sure, Bush created this nightmare -- but the current hunger-strike crisis stems from Obama's political cowardice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once upon a time, in the long-ago days of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, we may have had the worst and most abusive presidential administration in the history of the United States, but at least there was some moral clarity. You were on their side or you weren’t; you either bought into the idea that the <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/war_on_terror">“war on terror”</a> was a special set of circumstances that required an immense expansion of executive power and the indefinite suspension of constitutional norms, or you didn’t. Nothing quite symbolized that division like the military detention camp at <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/guantanamo_bay">Guantánamo Bay,</a> Cuba. It was a locked-down and secretive facility in a country that didn’t want us there, where hooded and manacled men – in theory, the most violent and dangerous anti-American militants on the planet – were kept under mysterious conditions, denied the rights we routinely accord to suspected murderers and rapists, and subjected to interrogations we didn’t want to know about.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/guantanamo_its_obamas_disgrace_now/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/04/guantanamo_its_obamas_disgrace_now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salman Rushdie writes NYT op-ed on &#8220;political courage&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/salman_rushdie_writes_nyt_op_ed_on_political_courage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/salman_rushdie_writes_nyt_op_ed_on_political_courage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salman Rushdie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nelson Mandela]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We find it easier, in these confused times, to admire physical bravery than moral courage," he writes ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an op-ed for the New York Times, author Salman Rushdie wonders why "physical bravery" has come to trump "moral courage" in the eyes of the public. "It’s a vexing time for those of us who believe in the right of artists, intellectuals and ordinary, affronted citizens to push boundaries and take risks and so, at times, to change the way we see the world," Rushdie writes.</p><p>From the op-ed:</p><blockquote><p>It’s harder for us to see politicians, with the exception of Nelson Mandela and <a title="More articles about Daw Aung San Suu Kyi." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/a/daw_aung_san_suu_kyi/index.html?inline=nyt-per">Daw Aung San Suu Kyi</a>, as courageous these days. Perhaps we have seen too much, grown too cynical about the inevitable compromises of power. There are no Gandhis, no Lincolns anymore. One man’s hero (Hugo Chávez, Fidel Castro) is another’s villain. We no longer easily agree on what it means to be good, or principled, or brave. When political leaders do take courageous steps — as France’s <a title="More articles about Nicolas Sarkozy" href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/s/nicolas_sarkozy/index.html?inline=nyt-per">Nicolas Sarkozy</a>, then president, did in Libya by intervening militarily to support the uprising against Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi — there are as many who doubt as approve. Political courage, nowadays, is almost always ambiguous.</p></blockquote><p>Read more <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/opinion/sunday/whither-moral-courage.html?smid=tw-share&amp;_r=0">here</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/salman_rushdie_writes_nyt_op_ed_on_political_courage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/salman_rushdie_writes_nyt_op_ed_on_political_courage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best of the Salon limerick contest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salon limerick contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manti Te'o]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13270425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part two: A roundup of some of our favorite poetic news items]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p id="internal-source-marker_0.39253279558081733" dir="ltr">The best limericks submitted by Salon readers since the election:</p><p dir="ltr">So we’ve come to this point, as a nation,</p><p dir="ltr">Where a white man with money and station,</p><p dir="ltr">Is no longer a shoe-in,</p><p dir="ltr">So the Right Wing’s now stewin’:</p><p dir="ltr">“’Tis the End of Civilization!”</p><p dir="ltr">Bruce F. Cole</p><p dir="ltr">Kamuela, Hawaii</p><p dir="ltr">From Delaware hails our VP,</p><p dir="ltr">A fiscal cliff jumper is he.</p><p dir="ltr">He'll work on your pecs,</p><p dir="ltr">Offer old ladies sex,</p><p dir="ltr">Won't someone please put this guy on TV?</p><p dir="ltr">Josh Klemons</p><p dir="ltr">Madison, Wis.</p><p dir="ltr">Where’s Obama’s diversity minder–</p><p dir="ltr">His “qualified female” staff finder?</p><p dir="ltr">He’s named white guys galore,</p><p dir="ltr">To positions top-drawer,</p><p dir="ltr">Perhaps he should borrow Mitt’s binder.</p><p dir="ltr"><a href="http://www.madkane.com/">Madeleine Begun Kane</a></p><p dir="ltr">Bayside, Queens</p><p dir="ltr">Did we have an assault weapons binge?</p><p dir="ltr">Just the thought should make all of us cringe.</p><p dir="ltr">Can we trust NRA,</p><p dir="ltr">To be honest when they,</p><p dir="ltr">Are the voice of a lunatic fringe?</p><p dir="ltr">Stephen Whitred</p><p dir="ltr">Barriere, B.C., Canada</p><p dir="ltr">In a tale of pro cycling woe,</p><p dir="ltr">Doping brought down a mighty hero.</p><p dir="ltr">But one detail I find,</p><p dir="ltr">Really frazzles my mind,</p><p dir="ltr">Who knew Oprah still had her own show?</p><p dir="ltr">Tom Foltz</p><p dir="ltr">Fort Wayne, Ind.</p><p dir="ltr">Although your new limerick contest is thrillin',</p><p dir="ltr">My brain appears not to be willin'</p><p dir="ltr">When every new verse</p><p dir="ltr">Than the last one is worse.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/14/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There is no Gosnell coverup</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/there_is_no_gosnell_coverup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/there_is_no_gosnell_coverup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kermit Gosnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The horrors and underlying disparities exploited by Kermit Gosnell aren't new -- nor have they been ignored(UPDATE)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week, the right wing has been working the refs, demanding to know why the press has been allegedly silent on the trial of Kermit Gosnell, the Philadelphia doctor who allegedly committed horrific acts against his patients with impunity for years. Fox News' Kristen Powers kicked it off with an Op-Ed in USA Today, <a  href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2013/04/10/philadelphia-abortion-clinic-horror-column/2072577/">claiming</a>, "The deafening silence of too much of the media, once a force for justice in America, is a disgrace." Michelle Malkin has helped <a href="http://twitchy.com/2013/04/10/kirsten-powers-michelle-malkin-quiz-the-media-whoiskermitgosnell-wheres-the-coverage/">spearhead</a> a Twitter campaign. Breitbart.com <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/04/12/Kermit-Gosnell-Abortion-Doc-Is-Most-Searched-Term-on-Politico-Yields-Zero-Matches">calls</a> it "a full-blown, coordinated blackout throughout the entire national media."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/there_is_no_gosnell_coverup/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/there_is_no_gosnell_coverup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>586</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The liberal media&#8217;s gift to Mitch McConnell</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/the_liberal_medias_gift_to_mitch_mcconnell/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/the_liberal_medias_gift_to_mitch_mcconnell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The unloved Senate minority leader is exploiting that Ashley Judd meeting leak to get a bit of conservative love]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a recording of an opposition research strategy meeting <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/04/mcconnell-use-senate-employees-research-political-attacks-ashley-judd">was leaked to Mother Jones</a>, Mitch McConnell is demanding that the <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/04/09/mcconnell-mother-jones-tape-ashley-judd/2066725/">FBI investigate</a> the bugging of his office <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/04/mcconnell-accuses-political-left-bugging-his-office.php">by the "political left."</a> This is silly. McConnell knows it's silly. The meeting was almost certainly <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/04/mitch-mcconnell-office-bugged/64059/">recorded by an attendee</a>, not by "bugs" planted by liberal spies.</p><p>But the point isn't really to catch the perpetrator. The point is <a href="http://teammitch.com/wiretap/?src=twitter">this ridiculous splash on his campaign website,</a> in which visitors are told that McConnell's office was "wiretapped" by "liberals" and are encouraged to respond by sending all of their contact information, along with some money, to Mitch McConnell's reelection campaign.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/the_liberal_medias_gift_to_mitch_mcconnell/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/the_liberal_medias_gift_to_mitch_mcconnell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thatcher: A female icon, but not a feminist one</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Margaret Thatcher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Affairs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's better to have women in public life, even those with whom we disagree, than no women in public life at all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have always been women like Margaret Thatcher in power. Never more than one or two at a time, of course. Thatcher was the embodiment of what Katha Pollitt memorably <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1991/04/07/magazine/hers-the-smurfette-principle.html?pagewanted=all&amp;src=pm">called</a> "the Smurfette syndrome," which is when "a group of male buddies will be accented by a lone female, stereotypically defined." She was not a feminist icon, nor any kind of feminist, as she took pains to remind people. "Some of us were making it before women's lib was even thought of," she once sniffed. To make it any more obvious, she might as well have literally kicked the ladder out from under her.</p><p>For decades, Thatcher's gender provided some public relations cover for her most noxious politics. That was true even today in the White House's statement on her death, which included the following treacly sentence: "As a grocer’s daughter who rose to become Britain’s first female prime minister, she stands as an example to our daughters that there is no glass ceiling that can’t be shattered."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/thatcher_a_female_icon_but_not_a_feminist_one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP thinks imitating BuzzFeed to raise money is WIN!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/the_gop_thinks_imitating_buzzfeed_to_raise_money_is_win/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/the_gop_thinks_imitating_buzzfeed_to_raise_money_is_win/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BuzzFeed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One crazy congressional campaign committee that is totally going to win the midterms with listicles]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The GOP is going to make its own BuzzFeed, apparently. <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/tech/the-new-house-republican-web-strategy-just-add-buzzfeed-20130404">National Journal's Brian Fung "won the Internet" yesterday</a> with his report on the National Republican Congressional Committee's thrilling new website, which has a sidebar, and features lists.</p><p>The NRCC also hired 20 writers (the GOP will save publishing!) to create conservative versions of the soul-deadening crap BuzzFeed's list-generators are forced to compile. While it may sound like the aim is to appeal to a new demo -- kids who remember the '90s and who also believe that balancing the federal budget with deep domestic spending cuts will also somehow spur economic growth -- it's actually not quite that ambitious: The point is to boost traffic to the NRCC website, and therefore to increase donations to the NRCC. It appeared to be working, too, even before the entire liberal Internet <a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/04/gops-pursuit-buzzfeed-style-memes-suicidal/63882/">stopped to point</a> and <a href="http://prospect.org/article/were-all-buzzfeed-now">laugh</a> at the notion of a "conservative BuzzFeed," giving the project a massive amount of attention.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/the_gop_thinks_imitating_buzzfeed_to_raise_money_is_win/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/the_gop_thinks_imitating_buzzfeed_to_raise_money_is_win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>