<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 18:14:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Indian politician accused of rape is stripped and publicly beaten</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/indian_politician_accused_of_rape_is_stripped_and_publicly_beaten/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/indian_politician_accused_of_rape_is_stripped_and_publicly_beaten/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delhi gang rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Local television stations released footage of women tearing off Mr. Brahma’s shirt and hitting him]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>As the five men charged in the gang-rape of a 23-year-old woman on New Delhi bus <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/indian_police_charge_5_in_new_delhi_gang_rape/" target="_blank">face murder charges</a>, a politician in northeast India accused of rape was stripped and beaten by a crowd of women.</p> <p>Bikram Singh Brahma is a member of the Congress Party in Assam and president of a district Congress committee in the state. He was arrested Thursday in the rape of a woman in Chirang, a district in Assam. As the New York Times <a href="http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/03/congress-politician-accused-of-rape-in-north-east-india-stripped-beaten-by-women/" target="_blank">reports</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>“A case has been registered against him under I.P.C. 376 by the lady’s husband,” G. P. Singh, the zonal inspector general of police, said in a telephone interview, referring to the section of the Indian penal code that applies to rape.</p> <p>Mr. Brahma attacked the woman Wednesday night while he was staying at her family’s house, Mr. Singh said on Thursday. “He was staying at their house, and under what circumstances will be the subject matter of the investigation,” he added.</p></blockquote> <p>Local television stations released a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f_DV2judBCo" target="_blank">video</a> of a group of women tearing off Mr. Brahma’s shirt and hitting him on the face and stomach.</p> <p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/f_DV2judBCo" frameborder="0" width="420" height="315"></iframe></p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/indian_politician_accused_of_rape_is_stripped_and_publicly_beaten/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/indian_politician_accused_of_rape_is_stripped_and_publicly_beaten/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary, coming to a theater near you?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_coming_to_a_theater_near_you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_coming_to_a_theater_near_you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood is abuzz over a screenplay that imagines the secretary of state as a 20-something at a crossroads ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Secretary of State Hillary Clinton continues to recuperate from a blood clot, there’s some good news for her — presuming she has some Hollywood aspirations. <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/hillary-script-buzzing-in-hollywood-85696.html?hp=r11">Politico reports today</a> on the screenplay "Rodham," one that ranked on last year’s Black List poll of Hollywood types on the best unproduced scripts.</p><p>While there’s no guarantee that "Rodham" will be made (and while its existence isn’t exactly new — <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/browbeat/2012/12/18/hillary_clinton_movie_rodham_by_screenwriter_young_il_kim_will_it_get_made.html">Slate reported on Young Il Kim’s screenplay last month</a>), the Politico brief is evidence of a level of public interest in Secretary Clinton that's high even by the usual standard.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_coming_to_a_theater_near_you/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/hillary_coming_to_a_theater_near_you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorry, East Coast Republicans, but this is your party too</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey governor helps the GOP keep power -- then doesn't like the results]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spare me, Chris Christie. The New Jersey governor <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/chris_christie_gops_toxic_politics_to_blame_for_delayed_sandy_aid/">delighted political reporters</a> with his theatrical excoriation of the Republican leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives after Speaker John Boehner refused to allow a bill funding aid for people affected by Hurricane Sandy to come to the floor for a vote this week.</p><p>This would be the same Christie who, in September 2012, headlined <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0912/81052.html">a fundraiser for Iowa congressman Steve King</a>, who is not just one of the craziest members of the GOP crazy wing, but who also <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/31/steve-king-hurricane-sandy_n_2047553.html">announced a month later that he probably wouldn't vote for relief money for Sandy victims</a> for the same reason he refused to vote for federal aid for victims of Hurricane Katrina: Because he was pretty sure people spent the relief money on "Gucci bags and massage parlors." This is a man Christie wanted to win reelection, in order to help Republicans maintain control of the House of Representatives, so that they could continue ignoring the priorities and desperate needs of liberal, urban coastal states like New Jersey.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/sorry_east_coast_republicans_but_this_is_your_party_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why 2013 is going to be awful</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13158946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's to a year of austerity, dysfunction, lousy Obama negotiations -- and no "Louie"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The good news is 2012 is over and will never happen again. The bad news is, now it's 2013. Here's why I'm not holding out hope for a great year in politics:</p><p><strong>Austerity</strong></p><p>It's coming. Congress will obsess over crafting a long-term deficit deal no matter what happens with the tax rates and the sequester. In all likelihood, we'll get regressive budget cuts at all levels of government, plus, for good measure, tax hikes not just on the rich but on working people. The well-funded "Fix the Debt" monsters will still demand massive cuts to Social Security and Medicare. Republicans are justifiably confident that they can use the debt ceiling to force more spending cuts less than a month from now. If all of this sinks the still-sluggish economic recovery, that'll be just one more sign that we need to cut more, and "tighten our belts." Plus the debt ceiling fight might just crash the world economy anyway.</p><p><strong>Congress Isn't Going to Do Anything</strong></p><p>As historically unproductive as the 112th Congress was, there's not much reason to expect more from the 113th. The Senate has gotten marginally more liberal and the House has gotten marginally less Republican, but the basic makeup of both is the same. It's still the case that House Republicans have no incentive to compromise on anything, while Senate Democrats live to compromise.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/why_2013_is_going_to_be_awful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hillary Clinton hospitalized with blood clot</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/hillary_clinton_hospitalized_with_blood_clot_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/hillary_clinton_hospitalized_with_blood_clot_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2012 01:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13157989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was caused by her recent concussion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton has been admitted to a New York hospital after the discovery of a blood clot stemming from the concussion she sustained earlier this month.</p><p>Clinton spokesman Philippe Reines says her doctors discovered the clot during a follow-up exam Sunday. Reines says Clinton is being treated with anti-coagulants.</p><p>Clinton was admitted to New York-Presbyterian Hospital so doctors can monitor the medication over the next 48 hours.</p><p>Reines says doctors will continue to assess Clinton's condition, "including other issues associated with her concussion."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/hillary_clinton_hospitalized_with_blood_clot_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/31/hillary_clinton_hospitalized_with_blood_clot_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;Zero Dark Thirty&#8221; debate isn&#8217;t really about torture</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/the_zero_dark_thirty_debate_isnt_really_about_torture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/the_zero_dark_thirty_debate_isnt_really_about_torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Bigelow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156550</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reducing "Zero Dark Thirty" to a partisan argument about torture misses the big questions it raises about America]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Art can be created with moralistic intentions, but it is inherently a ruthless and amoral endeavor, whose meaning always gets away from its creator. It can certainly be used to soothe the savage breast, lend succor in an hour of darkness, and so on. But let’s not forget that children in the death camps were made to play Schubert by murderers and torturers who believed themselves to be civilized and cultured men. That thread of civilization and culture is what saves teenage genius Wladyslaw Szpilman’s life in Roman Polanski’s <a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/12/27/pianist/">“The Pianist”</a> – but the ironic question posed by that film is whether that’s a good reason for one man to live while millions of others died. Because he could play the piano?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/the_zero_dark_thirty_debate_isnt_really_about_torture/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/the_zero_dark_thirty_debate_isnt_really_about_torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>98</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP hasn&#8217;t fallen off a cliff</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_republicans_will_be_fine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_republicans_will_be_fine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 22:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No matter how destructive and harmful and foolish they've been this month, they'll bounce back]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically, the Republican "strategy" on the current self-inflicted looming debt crisis is to constantly sabotage themselves and, eventually, the nation as a whole. Either they will just totally lose completely, or they'll somehow manage, through nihilism and intransigence, to pull out a deeply unpopular "victory" that will end up hurting the already crappy economy. So, basically, everyone agrees that <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/johnstanton/are-these-guys-really-in-charge-of-the-republican">they're idiots and they're screwing themselves</a>. Even people who think the GOP's "let's be very loudly irresponsible and then lose horribly" strategy is <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-12-28/when-getting-your-butt-kicked-is-the-strategy.html">more canny than it looks</a> agree that it hurts the "national brand" of the party and will likely lead to them becoming a permanent minority party.</p><p>I think, though, that regardless of how completely lost the Republican party is -- and they are well and truly lost, and not currently "negotiating" with anything resembling a coherent plan or unified voice -- they will emerge from the current mess unscathed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_republicans_will_be_fine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/the_republicans_will_be_fine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My fear of flying</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/my_fear_of_flying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/my_fear_of_flying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Flight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fear of flying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aerophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years, I wouldn't board a plane, even when my job called for it. This year, I faced my anxiety and took flight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you go by the law of averages, a baseball player who gets a hit in seven consecutive at-bats is really pushing his luck when he steps to the plate for the eighth time. This is the logic that kept me from flying for more than 16 years.</p><p>My first four flights were all involuntary, products of the dictatorship that state and federal law grants parents over their offspring. So I had no recourse when Mom and Dad planned a family trip to Georgia in the summer of 1989. I was 9 years old and already suffering from a raging case of aerophobia. The proximate source of this affliction was the horrific tragedy of Pan Am Flight 103, which had exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland, a few months earlier. The news reports had gripped me. I couldn’t stop thinking about what it must have been like for the passengers – sitting there comfortably, maybe talking, maybe sleeping, maybe watching a movie, and then in a micro-second a quick crack of noise followed instantly by … an eternity of nothingness. None of them ever saw it coming, or had any chance to do anything about it. The only way they could have saved themselves that day would have been by staying off that flight.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/my_fear_of_flying/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/my_fear_of_flying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s make Obama regret his war on weed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/lets_make_obama_regret_his_war_on_weed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/lets_make_obama_regret_his_war_on_weed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marijuana Legalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president's Justice Department won't let Washington and Colorado smoke up in peace. Can we change his mind?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barack Obama has pissed off the stoners again. He always does. In 2009 <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/03/26/obama-takes-pot-legalizat_n_179563.html">a question about marijuana legalization made him laugh</a>, a hard to miss sign that he didn't take the issue seriously. Worse than laughter has been his DEA, and its <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/27/inside-obama-s-war-on-weed.html">increasingly heavy-handed war on legal marijuana dispensaries.</a> Now that <em>recreational</em> marijuana has been legalized in Colorado and Washington, his Department of Justice is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/07/us/marijuana-initiatives-in-2-states-set-federal-officials-scrambling.html?_r=0">weighing its options</a>, and, reportedly, none of their options seem to be "just let people smoke their marijuana, because it's harmless."</p><p>Instead the feds are either looking to have a judge declare the state regulations invalid, or are out to browbeat states into recriminalizing the demon weed by withholding federal money. (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Minimum_Drinking_Age_Act_of_1984">A similar strategy</a> got the drinking age raised to 21 in every state, though it required legislation.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/lets_make_obama_regret_his_war_on_weed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/lets_make_obama_regret_his_war_on_weed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jim DeMint: The right&#8217;s new kingmaker</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/jim_demint_the_rights_new_kingmaker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/jim_demint_the_rights_new_kingmaker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this age of big money and corporate power, Jim DeMint will have more influence at a think tank than the Senate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the Washington media, there is a well-established tradition of respecting what I've long called the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/worst_ryan_puffery_yet/">No Money Rule</a>. Simply put, in the day-to-day coverage of politics, D.C. reporters tend to avoid focusing on the power of money over both parties, knowing that openly mentioning that influence is seen as uncouth in Washington's elite circles. It is viewed this way because talking about corporate cash, campaign contributions and corruption exposes politics for what it really is: not some high-minded intellectual exchange, not an honorable debate between statesmen, not even a competitive sport between ideological players, but instead a hideous greed-driven melee between moneyed interests -- one enabled by both parties and, quite often, much of the media itself.</p><p>Because of this No Money Rule, then, nobody should be surprised that there was almost no mention in any of the media of the real news behind Jim DeMint's announcement that he is leaving the U.S. Senate to head the Heritage Foundation. And that real news is this: His announcement is perhaps 2012's most biting message yet about the supremacy of money in American politics. Yes, even in a year whose presidential race was utterly dominated by super PAC special interest cash, nothing tells the story of where the true authority in politics lies than a sitting senator leaving a top post in the national government to lead a corporate-funded think tank.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/jim_demint_the_rights_new_kingmaker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/jim_demint_the_rights_new_kingmaker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salon limerick contest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/salon_limerick_contest_14/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/salon_limerick_contest_14/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 12:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salon limerick contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Petraeus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13115180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the election over, Salon's poetical readers find new targets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Salon readers show mercy for General Petraeus, but none for Sen. John McCain, R. Ariz., in this week's limerick contest:</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>"An outrage is what we have here,"</p><p>Said McCain, leading Fox News  to cheer.</p><p>The Benghazi 'collusion'?</p><p>Was merely delusion,</p><p>Designed as a Susan Rice smear.</p><p>Mike Moulton<br /> Gainesville, Fla.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Obama’s new hashtag is meant,</p><p>2 help middle class taxpayers vent,</p><p>Via tweets 2 demand,</p><p>That their tax hike is banned:</p><p>#My2k’s needed 4 rent.</p><p>Madeleine Begun Kane<br /> <a href="http://www.madkane.com/" target="_blank">http://www.madkane.com</a><br /> Bayside, Queens, N.Y.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>The sad lesson of General Petraeus,</p><p>Is not that our heroes betray us;</p><p>But the ugly glare of publicity,</p><p>Along with our share of complicity,</p><p>Does more than our sins can to slay us.</p><p>James W. Moore<br /> Montreal</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>Send your entries to limericks@salon.com. The deadline is 5 p.m. ET on Sunday. Please include your name and hometown. Good luck!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/salon_limerick_contest_14/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/salon_limerick_contest_14/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is feminism worth defending with torture?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/is_feminism_worth_defending_with_torture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/is_feminism_worth_defending_with_torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Bigelow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Kathryn Bigelow's thrilling Osama-hunting saga faces the thorniest moral dilemmas of the "war on terror"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None of us living today can know how historians of the future will judge the whole “war on terror” phase of American history. Will it remain a contentious point of ideological division, like McCarthyism or the 1960s, or will it become a national embarrassment to be swept under the carpet, like the Salem witch trials or the fulsome speeches in defense of slavery delivered on the floor of Congress? And then there’s the possibility that the terrorist-hunting mania of the years since 9/11 has driven us so completely nuts, and bankrupted us so thoroughly, that a balanced view of this age will only become possible after the whole edifice comes crashing down. To quote the most intelligent, most farsighted and most deeply hypocritical of our slave-owning Founding Fathers, I tremble for my country when I consider those future conversations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/is_feminism_worth_defending_with_torture/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/01/is_feminism_worth_defending_with_torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Obama reset the electoral map?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/did_obama_reset_the_electoral_map/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/did_obama_reset_the_electoral_map/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electoral College]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13108277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president might have captured the majority of swing states, but the country remains divided along similar lines]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney visited President Obama for lunch at the White House today, and the final congressional recount ended in North Carolina. It's safe to say that the 2012 election is officially in the books. With the numbers official, it's time to revisit Salon's version of the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/23/what_100_years_of_voting_looks_like/">electoral map</a>, and see how the reds and blues have shifted.</p><p>As you may recall, we calibrate our state colors by taking into account not just presidential election results, but also senatorial, congressional and gubernatorial elections. We give each equal weight and generate a color from pure blue (see Massachusetts) to pure red (see Kansas). This gives a far more nuanced picture of how each state votes, and not just what they decide every four years.</p><p>Click the image below to see how the map changed as a result of the 2012 election. You may want to keep an eye on North Carolina and Virginia.<br /> <a href="http://media.salon.com/2012/11/before_after_2012_election_thumb.jpg"><br /> </a><a href="http://media.salon.com/2012/11/before_after_2012_election3.gif"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/11/before_after_2012_election_thumb.jpg" alt="" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/did_obama_reset_the_electoral_map/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/did_obama_reset_the_electoral_map/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Race on to fill Jesse Jackson Jr.&#8217;s seat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/race_on_to_fill_jesse_jackson_jr_s_seat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/race_on_to_fill_jesse_jackson_jr_s_seat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse Jackson Jr.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13106099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A former NFL linebacker and Rod Blagojevich's lawyer are among those possibly chasing the Congressional seat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The jockeying to replace Jesse Jackson Jr. began before the ink was dry on the former congressman’s resignation letter.</p><p>Among those expressing an interest: Chicago aldermen, a former NFL linebacker and a defense attorney who represented R&amp;B singer R. Kelly and former Gov. Rod Blagojevich.</p><p>But as the field of would-be successors grows to a dozen or more names — one of whom may be another member of the Jackson family — party leaders and political analysts say a stampede of candidates could pose risks for the Democratic stronghold. Spread the field of candidates too thin, they say, and it becomes easier for a more conservative candidate — or anyone else party leaders don’t want — to pull off a win.</p><p>The possibility so worried Democratic Congressman Bobby Rush, a close friend of the Jacksons, that within hours of the resignation he had these words for anyone thinking of running: “Cool your jets.”</p><p>“My fear is that there is going to be so many wannabes blinded by ambition ... that we could find a tea party (candidate winning),” he said during a news conference. “That would be a travesty.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/race_on_to_fill_jesse_jackson_jr_s_seat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/23/race_on_to_fill_jesse_jackson_jr_s_seat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A holiday guide to arguing with your right-wing relatives</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/22/a_holiday_guide_to_arguing_with_your_right_wing_relatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/22/a_holiday_guide_to_arguing_with_your_right_wing_relatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thanksgiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Explaining voter fraud, Benghazi and the fiscal cliff to Fox-watching family members]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"The Holidays" are now officially here, and all Americans will soon have to face their extended families and listen to them talk. For many young Americans -- specifically young Americans related to old white Americans -- Thanksgiving and our various Winter Holidays are extra stressful, because young Americans are largely a liberal, Obama-voting bunch, and old white Americans are mostly not. Unfortunately, old white Americans spend a lot of their time being lied to by conservatives on TV, the radio and the Internet, and while that is not their fault, it can be hard to talk about politics with people who believe an elaborate series of fictions and distortions.</p><p>If you actually want to engage your right-wing relatives -- and let me be clear, you really should <em>not</em> do this, you are going to ruin Thanksgiving -- it's best to come prepared. Below, you'll find a series of talking points designed to address some of the most popular current trending topics in the alternate conservative media world. (You'll find <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/25/how_to_argue_with_right_wing_relatives/">last year's guide here</a>.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/22/a_holiday_guide_to_arguing_with_your_right_wing_relatives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/22/a_holiday_guide_to_arguing_with_your_right_wing_relatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>153</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Return of the 47 percent: The right&#8217;s latest tax lie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/return_of_the_47_percent_the_rights_latest_tax_lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/return_of_the_47_percent_the_rights_latest_tax_lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Lind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[47 percent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives can't stop! A new Heritage study echoes Mitt's "47 percent" theme -- and gets facts and history wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C., has always had a special place in my heart. In the late 1980s, during the presidency of George Herbert Walker Bush, the right-wing think tank provided me with my first job as a young conservative intellectual. My first assignment was to write a policy brief about presidential war powers. I was removed from the project after I wrote a draft that began with the observation that the U.S. Constitution divides war powers between Congress and the president, and gives the most important war powers — the power to declare war and to fund it — to Congress. The higher-ups at Heritage reassigned the paper to a Wall Street Journal staffer, who provided them with what they wanted: a brief arguing that the president has absolute, uncontrollable power in foreign affairs.</p><p>One of my next assignments was to write a policy paper justifying a forthcoming bill from the late Sen. Jesse Helms, a belligerent reactionary from North Carolina. When I met with the senator’s staff, I was told to wait because Helms wasn’t sure what he was going to put in the bill. After I failed to turn in the policy brief on time, I received an official reprimand from my supervisor, which I treasured until I lost it during a move. The reprimand said, in effect, that at Heritage we write policy papers first and add the facts later.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/return_of_the_47_percent_the_rights_latest_tax_lie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/20/return_of_the_47_percent_the_rights_latest_tax_lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I got duped by Glenn Beck!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/i_got_duped_by_glenn_beck/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/i_got_duped_by_glenn_beck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 20:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pundit bought the creative rights to the dystopian novel I edited, transforming it into right-wing propaganda]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two weeks ago I discovered, to my surprise, that I had line-edited an early draft of Glenn Beck’s new novel, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1476716692/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Agenda 21."</a> Glenn Beck! At the time I was working on it, the manuscript belonged to its actual author, a woman named Harriet Parke, who lives a few minutes from my aunt. But a year and a few lawyers later, Glenn Beck purchased the right to call himself its creator, and Ms. Parke agreed to be presented as a ghostwriter.</p><p>I would be proud to have my name in the acknowledgments of Ms. Parke’s novel. But given that it is printed inside a book bearing Glenn Beck’s name, the work I did is now deeply at odds with who I am as an editor. "Agenda 21" is going out into the world on Tuesday, Nov. 20, as something decidedly different from the novel I edited. Yes, the story is the same. So are the concepts, the characters and the writing. But the name in the byline — that changes the book’s intent. It changes everything.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/i_got_duped_by_glenn_beck/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/i_got_duped_by_glenn_beck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Andrew Cuomo, fake Democrat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/andrew_cuomo_fake_democrat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/andrew_cuomo_fake_democrat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Cuomo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New York's governor might lead his party in 2016. So why won't he fight for a state Senate majority they earned?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the New York state Senate remains controlled by the Republican Party, it won't be because of the voters. <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/blogs/hotlineoncall/2012/11/new-york-state-senate-control-still-in-flux-15">Democrats have 30 seats, with 32 required for a majority.</a> They're also ahead in two races currently being recounted. Simcha Felder, who won a Senate seat on the Democratic and Conservative Party lines in Brooklyn, has already announced that he will caucus with the Republicans. If the Democrats end up with a majority, there is a good chance a bunch of conservative Democrats will switch parties to ensure that the GOP retains control. One guy who's staying conspicuously out of the fight: <a href="http://www.gothamgazette.com/index.php/state/1998-how-hurricane-sandy-has-upended-politics-as-usual-in-albany">Democratic governor and 2016 presidential contender Andrew Cuomo.</a></p><blockquote><p>"The Assembly will pick a leader, and the Senate will pick a leader. And I have no intention of getting involved in either situation," Cuomo said at a press conference last week, while underscoring that he thought Democrats learned a lesson the last time they were in control of the Senate. "I think they learned the hard way. The Democrats were in power. The Democrats then lost power because of the dysfunction and I think they learned that lesson the hard way."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/andrew_cuomo_fake_democrat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/andrew_cuomo_fake_democrat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oliver Stone: America is an “outlaw nation”</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/oliver_stone_america_is_an_%e2%80%9coutlaw_nation%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/oliver_stone_america_is_an_%e2%80%9coutlaw_nation%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Untold History of the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Showtime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oliver Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oliver Stone's Untold History of the United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101213</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cinematic renegade talks about Obama, FDR, his new Showtime series and the myth of American exceptionalism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across a four-decade career in the movie business that has encompassed three Academy Awards, 18 narrative films and several documentaries as a director, and innumerable side projects as a writer and producer, Oliver Stone has been obsessed with one topic: America. Indeed, during what you might call Stone’s classic Hollywood period, from “Salvador” in 1986 to “Nixon” in 1995 – and I don’t exclude such apparent detours as “The Doors” and “Natural Born Killers” – his central subject has been all the ways the United States has driven itself crazy, on both the foreign and domestic fronts, in the years since his own Eisenhower-era childhood.</p><p>Given that background, it’s almost surprising that it’s taken Stone this long to tackle a straightforward nonfiction project like his Showtime miniseries “The Untold History of the United States,” which tries to counter the jingoistic mythmaking and obligatory “American exceptionalism” of most public discourse about 20th-century history. That phrase refers to a creed that still holds sway (or so polls suggest) among a large proportion of the U.S. population, although it hasn’t been taken seriously by historians for many years: The idea that America has a special and even sacred role to play in world history, and cannot be compared to other nations driven by the grubby realities of politics and economics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/oliver_stone_america_is_an_%e2%80%9coutlaw_nation%e2%80%9d/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/oliver_stone_america_is_an_%e2%80%9coutlaw_nation%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Game over, conservative friend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/game_over_conservative_friend/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/game_over_conservative_friend/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For months, our political arguments made a mess of Facebook. It's finally time to admit we just can't play nice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Rick,</p><p>I guess it’s not going to work out. I guess this is goodbye.</p><p>For 20 months now, since a few days after the Green Bay Packers won the Super Bowl and Gov. Scott Walker moved to crush public unions in Wisconsin and the protests began at the state capitol building in Madison, we have argued nearly every day of the week. We have argued late at night, in our underwear, with you full of Evan Williams and me full of French red wine. We have argued during your son’s football games. We have argued when my daughters have been playing Monopoly with me. We have argued at the mall, at the grocery store, out for dinner, out for a stroll with the dog, at work, at ballgames, at weddings, at funerals, in the sunshine, in the rain, in the snow, in sight of the beautiful summertime dew that clings to the grass here in Wisconsin, way early in the morning, even during that long drought in July and in August when rain was as scarce as good will toward people whose political views are not the same as our own. We never stopped, Rick.  We never surrendered.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/game_over_conservative_friend/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/game_over_conservative_friend/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>