<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:28:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Scandals boost number of potential 2014 Republican voters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/scandals_boost_number_of_potential_2014_republican_voters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/scandals_boost_number_of_potential_2014_republican_voters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great news for the right: Equal numbers of Americans intend to vote for each party in the midterms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trifecta of political controversies that Washington is currently fixated on have finally made a dent on the polls. Now, after a few weeks of making a big fuss about three completely unrelated Obama scandals, or at least some scandalous things that happened while Obama was president, an equal number of Americans intend to vote for Republicans and for Democrats in this year's midterm elections, according to <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/midterm-elections-poll-92036.html?hp=l4">a new Quinnipiac Poll reported by Politico.</a></p><blockquote><p>When asked who they wanted to send to the House of Representatives in next year’s midterm elections, the GOP and Democratic candidate tied at 38 percent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday. Twenty percent of those surveyed said they didn’t know or didn’t have an answer for who they would vote for. In Quinnipiac’s last two polls, released May 1 and April 3, Democrats had been leading Republicans 41-37 and 43-35, respectively.</p></blockquote><p>The unmentioned fun part is that if an equal number of votes are cast, in November 2014, for Democrats and for Republicans, that means that Republicans will win a massive wave election, easily retaining control of the House of Representatives and possibly retaking the Senate. And if that does happen no one will consider it odd or scandalous or anything.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/scandals_boost_number_of_potential_2014_republican_voters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/scandals_boost_number_of_potential_2014_republican_voters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>6 reasons Obama is losing the left</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/6_reasons_obamas_popularity_is_likely_to_plummet_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/6_reasons_obamas_popularity_is_likely_to_plummet_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keystone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Rodham Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The politics of hope and the politics of nope]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>It’s not just the scandal fever that’s invaded Washington, where the Obama White House is dodging accusations that the IRS went after the Tea Party, or it lied in the fog of war in the aftermath of the deadly attack on the embassy in Libya, or the Justice Department went too far in spying on Associated Press to find out who was leaking details about the the CIA’s secret wars.</p><p>Obama’s popularity seems destined to slide downhill as his second term unfolds, even if polls taken just before this latest political moment show that Obama’s core supporters are still with him. Looking beyond this week’s accusatory headlines, there are a handful of single issues that will resonate among key Democratic constituencies and big-picture economic issues that seem destined to push Obama’a ratings down. He may not end his presidency in the low 20s like George W. Bush. But it’s not a stretch to say that Obama’s 51 percent approval ratings last week may be the best that he will see this term.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/6_reasons_obamas_popularity_is_likely_to_plummet_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/6_reasons_obamas_popularity_is_likely_to_plummet_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Americans to government: Hands off our civil liberties</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/americans_to_government_hands_off_our_civil_liberties/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/americans_to_government_hands_off_our_civil_liberties/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surveillance cameras]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a pleasant surprise, voters are more concerned about retaining basic rights in wake of the Boston bombing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit I was a little bit surprised, but pleasantly: A new Time/CNN/ORC poll shows that Americans are actually more concerned about protecting civil liberties in the wake of the Boston bombing, not less. It turns out voters are smarter than many of their leaders, particularly (but not exclusively) on the Republican side of the aisle. Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who vilifies his local NYCLU by comparing it to the NRA, might want to take note.</p><p><a href="http://swampland.time.com/2013/05/01/poll-americans-more-concerned-about-civil-liberties-in-wake-of-boston-bombing/#ixzz2S4kizocR">Time has the details</a>, but the top line is:</p><blockquote><p>When given a choice, 61 percent of Americans say they are more concerned about the government enacting new anti-terrorism policies that restrict civil liberties, compared to 31 percent who say they are more concerned about the government failing to enact strong new anti-terrorism policies.</p></blockquote><p>Only 32 percent of Americans believe that the U.S. government can prevent all major attacks, down from an average of 40 percent in 2011 and 41 percent in 2006. And by contrast with polls taken in the wake of the 1996 Atlanta Olympics bombing, when only 23 percent of voters polled showed reluctance to give up civil liberties to protect terrorism, 49 percent said they were not willing to give up such rights, as opposed to 40 percent who were.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/americans_to_government_hands_off_our_civil_liberties/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/americans_to_government_hands_off_our_civil_liberties/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gallup: Higher approval for Presidents once they&#8217;re out of office</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gallup_higher_approval_for_presidents_once_theyre_out_of_office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gallup_higher_approval_for_presidents_once_theyre_out_of_office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except for Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a Gallup analysis, ex-Presidents tend to get higher approval ratings once they leave office - including <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/bush_family_furiously_selling_itself_to_americans_once_again/">George W. Bush</a>, and with the exception of Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/162044/history-usually-kinder-presidents.aspx">Gallup</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Additionally, seven of nine former presidents have had higher retrospective approval ratings than their final job approval rating as president just before leaving office. That includes George W. Bush, who earned a 47% retrospective approval rating in the November 2010 poll, the only time Gallup has measured Bush retrospectively. That rating is 13 percentage points higher than Bush's 34% final job approval rating as president in January 2009, but similar to his overall job approval average of 49%.</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gallup_higher_approval_for_presidents_once_theyre_out_of_office/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gallup_higher_approval_for_presidents_once_theyre_out_of_office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP antics will not damage Obama one bit</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/gop_antics_will_not_damage_obama_one_bit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/gop_antics_will_not_damage_obama_one_bit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Mar 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controversy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13216651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Partisan shots and mini-controversies rarely make a dent. To hurt Obama, the GOP will need a lot more than that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the Chuck Hagel fight?</p><p>If you’re reading about politics, of course you remember the fight that took up a fair amount of space in the political press over the last month.</p><p>Most Americans, however, ignored the whole thing; even among those dimly aware of it, the memory will fade rapidly. And that suggests an important lesson for Barack Obama in this flap: Don’t worry about losing a few news cycles. If it’s just about media flaps, the president has much more room for risk-taking than he may realize.</p><p>First, the evidence. There's very limited polling, but what there is suggests no one was paying any attention. A <a href="http://pollingreport.com/h-j.htm">Quinnipiac poll</a> taken at the beginning of February found a net-unfavorable rating … but with only 14 percent liking the former Nebraska senator, 18 percent not liking him, and an overwhelming 67 percent saying that they didn’t have an opinion. That’s before either of the filibuster votes on the Senate floor, but after his well-publicized Senate hearing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/gop_antics_will_not_damage_obama_one_bit/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/02/gop_antics_will_not_damage_obama_one_bit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Obesity&#8217;s a crisis, but we want our junk food</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/poll_obesitys_a_crisis_but_we_want_our_junk_food_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/poll_obesitys_a_crisis_but_we_want_our_junk_food_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obesity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans split on how much the government should do to promote healthy eating ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- We know obesity is a health crisis, or every new year wouldn't start with resolutions to eat better and get off the couch. But don't try taking away our junk food.</p><p>Americans blame too much screen time and cheap fast food for fueling the nation's fat epidemic, a poll finds, but they're split on how much the government should do to help.</p><p>Most draw the line at policies that would try to force healthier eating by limiting food choices, according to the poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.</p><p>A third of people say the government should be deeply involved in finding ways to curb obesity, while a similar proportion want it to play little or no role. The rest are somewhere in the middle.</p><p>Require more physical activity in school, or provide nutritional guidelines to help people make better choices? Sure, 8 in 10 support those steps. Make restaurants post calorie counts on their menus, as the Food and Drug Administration is poised to do? Some 70 percent think it's a good idea.</p><p>"That's a start," said Khadijah Al-Amin, 52, of Coatesville, Pa. "The fat content should be put up there in red letters, not just put up there. The same way they mark something that's poisonous, so when you see it, you absolutely know."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/poll_obesitys_a_crisis_but_we_want_our_junk_food_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/poll_obesitys_a_crisis_but_we_want_our_junk_food_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time readers pick Kim Jong Un as &#8220;Person of the Year&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/time_readers_pick_kim_jong_un_as_person_of_the_year/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/time_readers_pick_kim_jong_un_as_person_of_the_year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Jong Un]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Person of the Year]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13123860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An informal poll shows Time readers think the North Korean leader should win this year's award]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In advance of its "Person of the Year" issue, Time magazine took an informal poll to find out who readers wanted to see get the top honor, and 5.6 million people said Kim Jong Un.</p><p>From <a href="http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/12/13/and-the-winner-of-times-person-of-the-year-reader-poll-is/#ixzz2EwDfVOnL">Time</a>:</p><blockquote><p>This doesn’t mean Kim is TIME’s Person of the Year. That choice is made by the editors of TIME and will be revealed Dec. 19 on the <em>Today</em> show, on TIME.com and via TIME’s Twitter handle. The poll allows readers to weigh in on the people—and things (Hello, Curiosity Rover!)—whom they think influenced the news, for better or worse, in 2012.</p> <p>“While we don’t make our selection based on the poll results,” said TIME executive editor Radhika Jones in a recent interview, “it’s always interesting to see where some of our preferred candidates end up.”  (For more on how TIME editors choose the Person of the Year see our full Q&amp;A with Jones here)</p></blockquote><p>This continues Kim Jong Un's streak of winning meaningless awards this year, following his <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/27/chinese_paper_references_onion_article_calling_kim_jong_un_sexiest_man_alive/">selection</a> as The Onion's Sexiest Man Alive.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/time_readers_pick_kim_jong_un_as_person_of_the_year/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/time_readers_pick_kim_jong_un_as_person_of_the_year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gallup is very upset at Nate Silver</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/gallup_is_very_upset_at_nate_silver/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/gallup_is_very_upset_at_nate_silver/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FiveThirtyEight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13071687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The polling firm complains operations like FiveThirtyEight could spoil polling for everyone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did Gallup just blame Nate Silver for ruining the art and science of polling?</p><p>You don't have to read too far between the lines of a statement from Gallup's editor in chief, Frank Newport, <a href="http://pollingmatters.gallup.com/2012/11/polling-likely-voters-and-law-of-commons.html">published on Friday,</a> to get that impression.</p><p>Newport first attempts the formidable task of defending Gallup's polling accuracy during the 2012 campaign. Perhaps he was anticipating <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/10/which-polls-fared-best-and-worst-in-the-2012-presidential-race/">Silver's Saturday column,</a> which labeled Gallup the most inaccurate pollster of all the firms that measured voter sentiment this year. But Silver was hardly alone in wondering why Gallup regularly reported numbers much more favorable to Romney than anyone else in 2012. We deserve an explanation a little less lame than Newport's: what's the big fuss? Gallup wasn't really off by <em>that much.</em></p><p>But then it gets interesting:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/gallup_is_very_upset_at_nate_silver/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/gallup_is_very_upset_at_nate_silver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Businessweek pulls &#8220;attractive female students&#8221; poll after backlash</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/businessweek_pulls_attractive_female_students_poll_after_backlash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/businessweek_pulls_attractive_female_students_poll_after_backlash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Businessweek]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After facing overwhelmingly negative reactions, the publication pulled the poll, saying it was "in poor taste"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Friday, Nov. 9, Businessweek asked its Twitter followers to vote on "Which business school has the most attractive female students." Predictably, readers found the tweet and the poll it linked to <a href="http://topsy.com/www.businessweek.com/face-off/2012-11-09/which-business-school-has-the-most-attractive-female-students">offensive</a>. Writer Shelby Knox <a href="https://twitter.com/shelbyknox/status/267107652776099840">replied with sarcasm</a>: "Do women go to B-School to run companies, be on boards? Hell no! For the pleasure of male students," while Jamil Smith <a href="https://twitter.com/jamilsmith/status/267281576268812288">admonished</a> Businessweek, writing, "You'd think <a href="http://topsy.com/twitter/bw">@BW</a> would be above chauvinist crap like this, or should want to be."</p><p>But, as Daily Dot's Aja Romano points out, this is not the first year that Businessweek has issued polls <a href="http://images.businessweek.com/slideshows/20110907/fifty-colleges-with-the-hottest-guys-girls-and-nightlife#slide2">rating the attractiveness</a> of students:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/businessweek_pulls_attractive_female_students_poll_after_backlash/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/businessweek_pulls_attractive_female_students_poll_after_backlash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nate Silver nails it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/nate_silver_nails_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/nate_silver_nails_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 07:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13065015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Votes are still being counted, but the New York Times poll guru appears to have predicted every state correctly ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE #2: After a drawn-out and ultimately meaningless tally in Florida, Obama has been declared the winner. Nate Silver finishes this election cycle a perfect 50 for 50.</p><p>UPDATE: Florida hasn't yet been decided, but Romney carried Alaska and Obama has officially won Nevada -- just as Silver anticipated.</p><p>A side-by-side comparison of Nate Silver's predictions with the presidential election's results so far.</p><p><img src="http://media.salon.com/2012/11/jbny4pRX8.jpeg" alt="" width="430" /></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/nate_silver_nails_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/nate_silver_nails_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real Clear Politics has Obama over 300 EVs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/real_clear_politics_has_obama_over_300_evs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/real_clear_politics_has_obama_over_300_evs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Clear Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The closest thing to a source everyone can agree on has the president extending his lead]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/president/2012_elections_electoral_college_map_no_toss_ups_race_changes.html#previous_changes">RealClearPolitics</a> switched Virginia into the blue column Sunday putting the president over 300 electoral votes for the first time since October 9, shortly after the first presidential debate.</p><p>The politics clearinghouse site is the closest thing to a universally trusted source in the charged pre-election climate. It's influential poll averages projected Obama winning more than 300 electoral votes for the entire period between late January and early October (when it did not allow for toss-up states). After Obama stumbled at the Denver debate, his RCP projected total dipped as low as 277 electoral votes. A candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win the presidency.</p><p>The latest batch of swing state polls listed at <a href="http://politicalwire.com/archives/2012/11/05/latest_swing_state_polls.html">Taegan Goddard's Political Wire</a> brought more good news for Democrats this morning. President Obama led in three out of four Florida polls, three out of four Virginia polls and in polls of Ohio, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. One North Carolina poll had the candidates tied at 49 percent.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/real_clear_politics_has_obama_over_300_evs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/real_clear_politics_has_obama_over_300_evs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News assesses the data</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/fox_news_assesses_the_data/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/fox_news_assesses_the_data/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 23:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brit Hume]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can Brit Hume's audience tolerate basic math?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the face of polling data that seems to be favoring the reelection of President Barack Obama, professional poll-watchers on Fox News Sunday confronted the cognitive dissonance of three possible outcomes: 1) The polls are wrong, 2) Mitt Romney’s ground game will overcome the public opinion deficit, 3) Mitt Romney will lose.</p><p>After parsing the difference between national polls and state polls, Fox anchor Brit Hume concludes, “It’s hard to imagine as a political journalist that all these polls are off but the discrepancy is puzzling.”</p><p>Watch:</p><p><object width="400" height="243" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://rawreplaymedia.com/fvp/fvp5.8/player.swf" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="flashvars" value="&amp;file=http%3A%2F%2Frawreplaymedia.com%2Fmedia%2F2012%2F1204%2Ffox_fns_hume_puzzling_121104a.mp4&amp;image=http%3A%2F%2Frawreplaymedia.com%2Fmedia%2F2012%2F1204%2Ffox_fns_hume_puzzling_121104c.jpg&amp;logo=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rawreplaymedia.com%2Ffvp%2Frsvidlogo05.png&amp;plugins=viral-2h&amp;skin=http%3A%2F%2Frawreplaymedia.com%2Ffvp%2Ffvp5.8%2Fbeelden.zip&amp;viral.allowmenu=true&amp;viral.email_footer=http%3A%2F%2Frawstory.com&amp;viral.link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rawstory.com%2Frs%2F2012%2F11%2F04%2Fbrit-hume-polls-showing-romney-losing-are-puzzling%2F&amp;viral.oncomplete=false&amp;viral.onpause=false&amp;viral.pluginmode=FLASH&amp;logo.link=http://rawstory.com&amp;logo.file=http://www.rawreplaymedia.com/fvp/rsvidlogo05.png" /><embed width="400" height="243" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://rawreplaymedia.com/fvp/fvp5.8/player.swf" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="&amp;file=http%3A%2F%2Frawreplaymedia.com%2Fmedia%2F2012%2F1204%2Ffox_fns_hume_puzzling_121104a.mp4&amp;image=http%3A%2F%2Frawreplaymedia.com%2Fmedia%2F2012%2F1204%2Ffox_fns_hume_puzzling_121104c.jpg&amp;logo=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rawreplaymedia.com%2Ffvp%2Frsvidlogo05.png&amp;plugins=viral-2h&amp;skin=http%3A%2F%2Frawreplaymedia.com%2Ffvp%2Ffvp5.8%2Fbeelden.zip&amp;viral.allowmenu=true&amp;viral.email_footer=http%3A%2F%2Frawstory.com&amp;viral.link=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.rawstory.com%2Frs%2F2012%2F11%2F04%2Fbrit-hume-polls-showing-romney-losing-are-puzzling%2F&amp;viral.oncomplete=false&amp;viral.onpause=false&amp;viral.pluginmode=FLASH&amp;logo.link=http://rawstory.com&amp;logo.file=http://www.rawreplaymedia.com/fvp/rsvidlogo05.png" /></object></p><p>h/t <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/04/brit-hume-polls-showing-romney-losing-are-puzzling/">Raw Story</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/fox_news_assesses_the_data/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/fox_news_assesses_the_data/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt hits the panic button</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/romney_hits_the_panic_button/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/romney_hits_the_panic_button/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 20:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[political ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney's campaign says he's winning, but a series of wildly dishonest ads suggest he's growing desperate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With just six days before Election Day it’s time to ask: Who’s going to win? If you ask the Romney campaign, they’ve got this thing in the bag. "The race comes down to independents. We lead among independents,” Romney pollster Neil Newhouse said on a <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/10/beeson-obama-firewall-is-burning-147896.html?hp=l8">conference call</a> with reporters on the state of the race this morning. “The firewall that I think [the Obama campaign] talked about was Iowa, Wisconsin and Ohio. Right now their firewall is burning,” added Rich Beeson, Romney’s political director. Meanwhile, Karl Rove predicts Romney will sail to victory with at least <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204846304578090820229096046.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop">279 electoral votes</a> (“probably more”); the “<a href="http://unskewedpolls.com/">unskewed</a>” polls show Romney winning in a massive landslide with 321 electoral votes to Obama’s 217; and Breitbart bloggers say “Mitt Romney is now <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/breitbart_com_genius_christie_being_nice_to_obama_because_romney_is_winning_so_much/">running away with</a> this election.” Indeed, national polls slightly favor Romney.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/romney_hits_the_panic_button/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/01/romney_hits_the_panic_button/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In defense of Nate Silver &#8212; and basic math</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/in_defense_of_nate_silver_and_basic_math/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/in_defense_of_nate_silver_and_basic_math/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13058754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pundits taking pot shots at the New York Times stats whiz need to take remedial math]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a great philosopher <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO0cvqT1tAE">once observed</a>, “Math class is tough!”</p><p>This insight has been confirmed numerous times in the past few weeks, as various pundits have taken innumerate pot shots at Nate Silver, the New York Times blogger and author, who as of today estimates that President Obama has a 77.4 percent chance of winning reelection next week.</p><p>The Villager gossip site Politico has featured several criticisms from its stable of contributors, who in the great tradition of political journalism have not allowed their ignorance of a subject – in this case probability theory – to keep them from opining on it.</p><p>Behold the wit and wisdom of <a href="https://twitter.com/joshgerstein/status/263007651573669888 ">Josh Gerstein</a>  and <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2012/10/nate-silver-romney-clearly-could-still-win-147618.html">Dylan Byers</a>: Gerstein asks, “Isn’t the basic problem with the Nate Silver prediction in question, and the critique, that it puts a percentage on a one-off event?”  Meanwhile, Byers concludes that, “should Mitt Romney win on Nov. 6, it’s difficult to see how people can continue to put faith in the predictions of someone who has never given that candidate anything higher than a 41 percent chance of winning.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/in_defense_of_nate_silver_and_basic_math/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/in_defense_of_nate_silver_and_basic_math/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>122</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten of the right&#8217;s craziest election conspiracies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/ten_of_the_rights_craziest_election_conspiracies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/ten_of_the_rights_craziest_election_conspiracies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13034565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The closer we get to November 6, the nuttier the theories become. A look at some of the right's finest moments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lengths to which our conservative establishment goes to bury Obama in mud often resemble D-Movie spy plots that set new standards for implausibility.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The frequency and outlandishness of their conspiratorial imaginations grows in sync with their desperation. With Obama leading in most polls and the election season drawing to a close, it seems like a good time to recap some of the more ludicrous conspiracies hatched by our conservative fearmongers. So with our tin-foil hats securely strapped on, let's  venture down the primrose path of hair-raising hypotheses.</p><p><strong>1. Cooking the Unemployment Rate</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/ten_of_the_rights_craziest_election_conspiracies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/ten_of_the_rights_craziest_election_conspiracies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#8217;s poll plunge continues</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/27/mitts_poll_plunge_continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/27/mitts_poll_plunge_continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13023484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest numbers roundup shows the former Massachusetts governor slipping nationwide]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/Prospect-Logo.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> At a certain point, it’s a little boring to say that Mitt Romney is suffering in the polls. But here we are, and Mitt Romney is still losing support nationwide. As always, the Gallup and Rasmussen tracking polls show a much tighter race than the larger surveys commissioned by media outlets. Bloomberg has President Barack Obama up six among likely voters, compared to the tie registered by Rasmussen. Gallup also has Obama ahead by six, but this is among registered voters; his margin is certain to narrow once Gallup screens for likely voters.</p><p>The big news, as you can see, is in the swing states. The latest poll from CBS News, The New York Times, and Quinnipiac University has Obama with a 9-point lead in Florida and a 10-point lead in Ohio. Public Policy Polling gives Obama a 7-point advantage in Iowa, and the Florida-Times Union has Obama with a more modest lead of 49 to Mitt Romney’s 46.</p><h3 id="september26">September 26</h3><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/27/mitts_poll_plunge_continues/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/27/mitts_poll_plunge_continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
