<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Pornography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/pornography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Hustler&#8217;s denigrating S.E. Cupp &#8220;satire&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/hustlers_denigrating_s_e_cupp_satire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/hustlers_denigrating_s_e_cupp_satire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12926889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Larry Flynt hides behind free speech to degrade a conservative]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's not as if one expects subtle political discourse from Hustler. But come on.</p><p>Larry Flynt's venerable publishing enterprise has, throughout its history, championed freedom of expression in its own unique way. In 1984, Flynt famously went <a href="http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/hustler.html">all the way to the Supreme Court</a> over the right to run a parody ad of inexhaustible loon Jerry Falwell reminiscing about losing his virginity to his mother in an outhouse. Tasteless? Yes. An obvious lampooning of a public figure? Also yes. But when Hustler recently ran a photo of conservative writer S.E. Cupp Photoshopped to look like she was performing oral sex, that was something altogether different.</p><p>The Cupp photo exists as a "celebrity fantasy" – i.e., an imaginary hate bang. And though Hustler takes pains to cover its butt, noting that "No such picture of S.E. Cupp actually exists. This composite fantasy is altered from the original for our imagination, does not depict reality, and is not to be taken seriously for any purpose," it ponders, grossly, "What would S.E. Cupp look like with a dick in her mouth?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/hustlers_denigrating_s_e_cupp_satire/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/24/hustlers_denigrating_s_e_cupp_satire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>171</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bringing home a porn star</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/28/bringing_home_a_porn_star/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/28/bringing_home_a_porn_star/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12742801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sleeping with my favorite male performer gave me new appreciation for the difference between fantasy and reality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at a neighborhood bar when in walked a man that I'd slept with before -- virtually speaking. We had traded intimacies without ever having met.</p><p>I grabbed my friend's arm and whispered, "My favorite male porn star just walked in the door." She looked at me dumbfounded: "You have a <em>favorite</em> male porn star?" OK, so the competition isn't steep and, yes, I'm one of those mythic women who actually like porn (but for the record, we make up an estimated one-third of visits to adult sites). When I first clicked across this man -- with his smoldering eyes, strong nose and athletic body -- it allowed me to forget for a moment that porn is largely made by and for men. He's a rare male performer who is charismatic, young and handsome -- everything the infamous Ron Jeremy is not.</p><p>Seeing him in person, there was one thought on my mind: <em>I need to sleep with him.</em></p><p>I'd been practicing for this moment since puberty. At age 12, I started investigating the world of sex online like a naughty Nancy Drew, desperately trying to solve the mystery of the male sexual psyche -- and, given that I now write about sex for a living, I guess I've never stopped. From early-'90s chat rooms to hardcore gonzo porn, I've plumbed the depths of men's desires, desperately trying to figure out exactly what men want in bed so that I could <em>be</em> exactly what men want in bed. Somewhere along the way, I started to explore what I desired -- beyond just being desired -- thanks in no small part to the men of porn.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/28/bringing_home_a_porn_star/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/28/bringing_home_a_porn_star/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>176</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santorum&#8217;s bad porn science</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/santorums_bad_porn_science/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/santorums_bad_porn_science/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12701831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The candidate claims that "a wealth of research" shows porn "causes profound brain changes." Experts say he's wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were lots of things to poke fun at in Rick Santorum's <a href="http://www.ricksantorum.com/enforcing-laws-against-illegal-pornography">anti-porn pledge</a>, but the element perhaps most deserving of mockery has been widely ignored: his claim that "a wealth of research is now available demonstrating that pornography causes profound brain changes in both children and adults, resulting in widespread negative consequences."</p><p>You want to know what's profound? How scientifically inaccurate that statement is.</p><p>Pornography surely changes the brain in some ways -- but so does <em>everything</em>. "Watching the NCAA playoffs is going to change your brain, eating chocolate -- any time you have any kind of experience, it's going to change your brain," says Rory C. Reid, a research psychologist at the Neuropsychiatric Institute at UCLA. "The real question is, 'Are those changes substantial enough that there's going to be some observable effect?'"</p><p>As to Santorum's claim that such damning research exists, Reid says: "Well, if there is, I'd sure like to see it!" He continues, "There's not a single study to my knowledge that has even demonstrated half of that [claim]." Allow me to put into perspective Reid's expertise: He not only specializes in neuropsychology but he's also one of the world's top experts on hypersexual behavior. If any such evidence existed, let alone "a wealth of research," he would have seen it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/santorums_bad_porn_science/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/santorums_bad_porn_science/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Are you on the cover of a magazine?&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/are_you_on_the_cover_of_a_magazine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/are_you_on_the_cover_of_a_magazine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2012 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Sex Work Coming Out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon -- After Dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12245351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During a trip to the bookstore, my mom wandered into the gay section -- and saw my face]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've lived in San Francisco for 18 years, and I've always been around porn. For a long time, I worked behind the scenes, at a couple of companies' websites and stuff like that, but I had never wanted to do porn because I wasn't secure with the way I looked or I had a boyfriend who was against it. Around 2009, those weren't problems anymore. I got approached to do some nude photo shoots, and one of them ended up being picked up by Men Magazine, which at that time was kind of a big thing. At the same time, a friend of mine was directing a video that he wanted me to be in. At first I just wanted to be an extra, and then he was like, "Why not just have sex in it?" And so I did. Then another director found out about me, and then another, and then I was scheduled in four videos in pretty much the same time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/are_you_on_the_cover_of_a_magazine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/20/are_you_on_the_cover_of_a_magazine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santorum is using kids to attack porn</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/19/santorum_is_using_kids_to_attack_porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/19/santorum_is_using_kids_to_attack_porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12698941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the candidate's rhetoric, his pledge to renew obscenity prosecutions has nothing to do with children]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After publishing an <a href="http://www.ricksantorum.com/enforcing-laws-against-illegal-pornography">anti-pornography pledge</a> on his website last week, Rick Santorum courted questions this weekend about how, exactly, he plans to attack smut. He didn't make it clear and instead continued to rely on vague rhetoric about the threat to children.</p><p>On <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/rick-santorum-obama-favors-pornographers-over-children-2012-3">CNN's "State of the Union"</a> Sunday, he said, "Under the Bush administration, pornographers were prosecuted much more rigorously than they are ... under the Obama administration." He added, "My conclusion is they have not put a priority on prosecuting these cases, and in doing so, they are exposing children to a tremendous amount of harm. And that to me says they're putting the unenforcement of this law and putting children at risk as a result of that."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/19/santorum_is_using_kids_to_attack_porn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/19/santorum_is_using_kids_to_attack_porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mistrial in porn obscenity case</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/mistrial_in_porn_obscenity_case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/mistrial_in_porn_obscenity_case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12539251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pornographer Ira Isaacs' case ends with a deadlocked jury. He says he expects a retrial]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pornographer <a href="“http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/my_obscenity_trial_subpoena/singleton/”">Ira Isaacs’ obscenity trial</a> ended today with a hung jury. That’s not a crude joke: After watching four films featuring scatology and bestiality, the jury of 12 was unable to come to a verdict. It was a close call: 10 found him guilty; two voted “innocent.” The prosecution has yet to decide whether it will retry the case -- but Isaacs, reached by phone this afternoon, says he expects this “roller coaster” to continue.</p><p>Interestingly, he says the prosecution was worried that the defense was stacking the jury with men -- but it was two women who voted in his favor. Isaacs says he spoke with one of those women, a 75-year-old who, according to the <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/03/mistrial-declared-in-la-fetish-film-producers-obscenity-case.html">Los Angeles Times</a>, “wore a Christmas-themed sweater with snowmen” to court, and thanked her “for standing up for freedom of speech.” He says that the juror was particularly sympathetic to his argument about artistic merit and freedom of speech because her late husband made horror movies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/mistrial_in_porn_obscenity_case/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/mistrial_in_porn_obscenity_case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My obscenity trial subpoena</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/my_obscenity_trial_subpoena/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/my_obscenity_trial_subpoena/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12443581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been called to testify in a federal trial against a pornographer. Here's why this case really matters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(updated below)</strong></p><p>The Department of Justice has booked my plane tickets and hotel room in downtown Los Angeles. Now I just need to buy an actual pair of non-denim pants and I’ll be ready for my subpoenaed testimony this Thursday in a federal obscenity trial.</p><p>Seriously, though, for reasons much greater than my own involvement, this is a trial to pay attention to.  The pornographer on trial, Ira Isaacs, is indicted for making and selling what’s known colloquially as “poo porn,” and redistributing foreign-made bestiality films, like "Japanese Doggie 3 Way." Needless to say, he's not a porn magnate along the lines of Larry Flynt or Steven Hirsch: The guy is small-time. But he's at the center of a now-rare obscenity trial, in which prosecutors will argue that the sexually explicit movies that he sold -- not all of which he made -- are offensive, violate community standards and have no redeeming artistic merit. The charges could put the 61-year-old in jail for the rest of his life.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/my_obscenity_trial_subpoena/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/my_obscenity_trial_subpoena/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The porn identity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/the_porn_identity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/the_porn_identity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon -- After Dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12223311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Lisa Ann to Dale Dabone, performers choose their names for a reason. We spoke to the experts about why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes a good porn star name? As the childhood game goes, you can combine your first pet with the street you grew up on to find yours. (In my case, it's Max Harvard.) But the truth is, some names just <em>sound </em>porn-y: For women, it's names like Amber, Tiffany and Britney. For guys, it's Lance, Brock and Butch. But what makes these names pornier than, say, Edith and Barnaby? What makes a porn name work?</p><p>While pornographic film has ostensibly been in existence since the birth of the moving image, the porn star name did not take hold until the 1970s, when the rise of adult theaters and the emergence of full-lenth mainstream porn films such as <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRNwZWkR_dM">"Deep Throat"</a> (1972), "The Boys in the Sand" (1971) and "The Devil in Miss Jones" (1973) created a new space for pornographic actors and actresses to become popular icons. Some argue "Deep Throat’s" Linda Lovelace was America’s first household “porn name.” Other porn stars like Bambi Woods, Seka and Johnny Wadd followed suit.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/the_porn_identity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/the_porn_identity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Explaining the &#8220;money shot&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/explaining_the_money_shot/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/explaining_the_money_shot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 04:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Porn Anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon -- After Dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12288131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It\'s the defining aesthetic of modern porn -- but why? Theories range from sperm competition to post-HIV stigma]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's hard to imagine a time when the "money shot" wasn't a signature of the smut industry. The shot -- where a male porn performer ejaculates, usually on a partner, and the camera captures the action in luxuriating detail -- is the defining aesthetic of contemporary pornography, both gay and straight. But it wasn't always that way.</p><p>The "money shot" can be traced back to the premiere of "Deep Throat" in 1972, according to Linda Williams, a film studies professor at UC Berkeley. That isn't to say that male performers didn't bust outside the body before then, but the legendary film “introduced narrativity in the genre and coined the cum shot as its defining figure," she writes in “Hard Core: Power, Pleasure and the Frenzy of the Visible.” Williams explains, "Where the earlier short, silent stag films occasionally included spectacles of external ejaculation (in some cases inadvertently), it was not until the early seventies, with the rise of the hard-core feature, that the money shot assumed the narrative function of signaling the climax of a genital event."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/explaining_the_money_shot/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/explaining_the_money_shot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Porn is coming for your daughter!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/porn_is_coming_for_your_daughter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/porn_is_coming_for_your_daughter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12293711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Nightline" warns of the "deeply disturbing" trend of teen girls watching porn, all thanks to performer James Deen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night's <a href="http://fleshbot.com/5881959/parents-lock-up-your-daughters-james-deen-is-on-the-loose-on-the-internet">"Nightline" segment</a> on porn star <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/porn_13/singleton/">James Deen</a> and his legions of underage female fans is the finest piece of parental scaremongering that I've seen in some time. (Well, at least since Caitlin Flanagan's Sunday <a href=" http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/29/opinion/sunday/adolescent-girl-hysteria.html">New York Times article</a> on the scourge of "hysteria" among adolescent girls.)</p><p>ABC's Terry Moran introduced the segment by warning, "For any parent concerned about what their teen does online, the huge popularity of the young man you're about to meet may be <em>deeply</em> disturbing." We're then introduced to a handful of young women – all well over 18 – who think 25-year-old Deen is totally hot and, like, "the Ryan Gosling of porn." Then reporter Cecilia Vega announces that the adult business "has now targeted and reached a new demographic: teenage girls."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/porn_is_coming_for_your_daughter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/03/porn_is_coming_for_your_daughter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>L.A.&#8217;s porn mistake</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/l_a_s_porn_mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/l_a_s_porn_mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12189561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As an actress who's worked with and without condoms, I can tell you: Mandatory enforcement is misguided]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, in a widely anticipated vote, the Los Angeles City Council passed an ordinance requiring condoms to be used in all permitted adult films shot within their city limits. This move may be well intentioned, but having worked as a performer and director in the adult film industry for the last decade, I see this as an ineffectual move that might be bad news for the performers it ostensibly protects.</p><p>According to the ordinance, adult film production companies will pay an additional fee with their permit applications to cover an as-of-yet undetermined method of enforcement. Currently, condoms are used in the mainstream gay adult film industry (which includes only gay male films), while the heterosexual industry (which includes both lesbian and straight films) has used mandatory STI testing as a health and safety precaution since the early 2000s. Until May of 2011, the Adult Industry Medical Center, founded by retired performer Dr. Sharon Mitchell, ran the nationwide STI testing service and database that certified heterosexual performers as STI-free previous to their working on any production.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/l_a_s_porn_mistake/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/l_a_s_porn_mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How sex, bombs and burgers shaped our world</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/08/how_sex_bombs_and_burgers_shaped_our_world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/08/how_sex_bombs_and_burgers_shaped_our_world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=11975691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Skype to robotics, our basest instincts have given us our greatest innovations. An expert explains why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our lives today are more defined by technology than ever before. Thanks to Skype and Google, we can video chat with our family from across the planet. We have robots to clean our floors and satellite TV that allows us to watch anything we want, whenever we want it. We can reheat food at the touch of a button. But without our basest instincts -- our most violent and libidinous tendencies -- none of this would be possible. Indeed, if Canadian tech journalist Peter Nowak is to be believed, the key drivers of 20th-century progress were bloodlust, gluttony and our desire to get laid.</p><p>In his new book, "Sex, Bombs and Burgers," Nowak argues that porn, fast food and the military have completely reshaped modern technology and our relationship to it. He points to inventions like powderized food, which emerged out of the Second World War effort and made restaurant chains like McDonald's and Dairy Queen possible. He shows how outsourced phone sex lines have helped bring wealth to poor countries, like Guyana. And he explains how pornography helped drive both the home entertainment industry and modern Web technology, like video chat. An entertaining and well-research read, filled with surprising facts, "Sex, Bombs and Burgers" offers a provocative alternate history of 20th-century progress.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/08/how_sex_bombs_and_burgers_shaped_our_world/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/08/how_sex_bombs_and_burgers_shaped_our_world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Men&#8217;s strip club confessions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/mens_strip_club_confessions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/mens_strip_club_confessions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 01:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10245972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new blog gives voice to guys who empty their pockets just to see naked flesh, and reveals a lot about male desire]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do men visit strip clubs? The answer to that question may seem so obvious as to not even warrant asking in the first place, but the new blog <a href="http://lettersfromstripclubs.blogspot.com/">Letters From Men Who Go to Strip Clubs"</a> proves just how wrong that assumption is. It's the brainchild of journalist Susannah Breslin and just the latest in a series of "Letters" projects in which men email her with brief confessionals about why they gravitate toward the sex industry – whether it's by <a href="http://lettersfromwatchers.blogspot.com/">watching porn at home</a>, trolling Craigslist <a href="http://lettersfromjohns.blogspot.com/">for a cheap blow job</a> or tucking dollar bills into strippers' g-strings – some of which she then posts online. The result is essentially open-source sociological data -- and some of it is bizarrely poetic.</p><p>"In the dead of night, alone at home, the loneliness sometimes becomes unbearable," writes one man. "There aren't many places to go in the middle of the night, and most of those choices don't necessarily ensure any kind of reasonable human interaction." Another man explains, "Nobody talks to me, nobody cares what I say. I'm a 24-year-old drone who wastes his days sitting at a computer reviewing spreadsheets that don't really matter," he says. "I just want to talk to someone who cares, and $1 every 3 minutes is a lot less than $250 an hour for a therapist."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/mens_strip_club_confessions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/mens_strip_club_confessions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Diary of a porn store clerk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/20/diary_of_a_porn_store_clerk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/20/diary_of_a_porn_store_clerk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10232149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the gay dads to the men dressed like "Cruising" extras, our clientele taught me a whole new perspective on sex]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short, squat man in the Dallas Cowboys windbreaker staggers out from the arcade, propping himself against the wall. Between that and the sweat beading his body, I know he’s left me a surprise in one of the booths: My first dirty needle. A minor panic fills my body. I hope he hasn’t buried it underneath a pile of semen-encrusted paper towels. No job is worth hepatitis. Especially not a job monitoring glory holes at a cruising spot across the street from a middle school in Portland, Ore.</p><p>No matter how much you think you know about the varied and nuanced spectrum of human sexuality, you realize you don’t know squat until you work in a porn store with a vibrant and active arcade. People don’t come here to buy porn. Our customers  -- over 90 percent same-sex-attracted men -- come here to meet up for casual, semi-public sex. The arcade is a dark, damp area with about 15 small, squarish booths with video screens, chairs, trash cans and, of course, paper towels. The defining feature, however, is the holes between the booths, called glory holes. They aren’t jury-rigged glory holes common in arcades. They are professional, finished pieces of custom carpentry. The booth has three hard-and-fast rules: No drugs (except the amyl nitrate and nitrous oxide we sell at the counter), no turning tricks, and always feed the meter if you want to stay in the booth.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/20/diary_of_a_porn_store_clerk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/20/diary_of_a_porn_store_clerk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A feminist&#8217;s secret sexist fantasy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/18/a_feminists_secret_sexist_fantasy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/18/a_feminists_secret_sexist_fantasy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Am I Normal?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10231397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A reader publicly rails against inequality but privately indulges in "the most demeaning" porn imaginable -- why?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I am a feminist, and part of me loves porn. More specifically, the kind of porn that is created to be viewed by men. I'm not a man, though. I'm the kind of woman who will make others uncomfortable by pointing out a sexist joke in a commercial and driving the point home to people who don't think anything is wrong with it, or by forwarding something from a sociological blog to my friends, usually something pointing out the ridiculousness of gendered products or blatant sexism. And yet, I cannot escape the fact that I find male-oriented porn extremely arousing. I know that most lesbian porn is extremely inaccurate and insulting, and it still turns me on. I'm not sure why this is, and it really bothers me. I hate how sexualized American culture has become and how all men expect women to have shaved crotches. I worry about the effect it will have on my potential future children. But I am turned on sexually (not intellectually) by the most demeaning smut. I've tried watching more "women friendly" porn, and the same effect isn't there. What is wrong with me?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/18/a_feminists_secret_sexist_fantasy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/18/a_feminists_secret_sexist_fantasy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I like vintage erotica</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/i_like_vintage_erotica/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/i_like_vintage_erotica/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Am I Normal?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10191451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A reader asks if fantasizing about now-dead people is "creepy." We ask Dan Savage and other experts to weigh in]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dan Savage <a href="”http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/Content?oid=167448&amp;mode=print“">says that it's creepy</a> to fantasize about people who have died. Because it is not possible to ever actually ... you know. I may agree with him about the recently deceased, but I like vintage erotica, and sometimes I do fantasize that I'm making love to the women in those naughty French postcards -- the lingerie, the beds, the divans, the pillows on the floor ... it's all so soft and warm and pre-Raphaelite. When the Internet happened and all the porn became available, like most lesbians, I didn't like any of it -- until I found the porn of pre-WWI Europe. Finally! I have a genre. What a relief. </strong></p><p><strong>I've noticed that modern photographs that re-create vintage erotica do nothing for me. Women in the costumes with the period props are just silly. There's something about knowing that she lived her life long ago and left only these beautiful glimpses of her sexual expression that captures my erotic imagination.</strong></p><p><strong>But. She's dead now. And there's no possibility of meeting her. But I think Dan is wrong. What do your experts say?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/i_like_vintage_erotica/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/i_like_vintage_erotica/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The science of objectification</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/the_science_of_objectification/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/the_science_of_objectification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10186185</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The common wisdom is that naked women are seen as objects, but new research says it's more complicated than that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Sharon Bialek stepped before the press this week, she wore a demure, long-sleeved black dress. The 50-year-old single mom also made sure to detail exactly what she wore when she was allegedly sexually harassed by Herman Cain. This is because she and her bulldog lawyer well know that women are judged by what, and how little, they wear.</p><p>A new study attempts to explain exactly how that judgment works and why our perceptions of people rely on the amount of skin they show. It's a question at the heart of contentious debates about everything from objectification in pornography to work-appropriate attire. Typically it’s been assumed that this is something that happens when men perceive women -- the infamous “male gaze” -- and that it involves, as one of the study’s researchers, Kurt Gray of the University of Maryland, put it, “the wholesale stripping away of mind” (in other words, viewing someone as a mindless sex object). “This study challenges all of those ideas,” he told me by phone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/the_science_of_objectification/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/the_science_of_objectification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Mommy is a love artist&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/mommy_is_a_love_artist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/mommy_is_a_love_artist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10160778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Porn star and performance artist Madison Young invites us into bed for a chat about motherhood and sexuality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm eating breakfast in bed with a porn star. Madison Young, clad in high heels, a vintage dress and an apron, flips a batch of pancakes until golden brown and then hands me a plate swimming in butter and maple syrup -- just like mom used to do.</p><p>She's a mom herself, actually – to 8-month-old Emma – as well as a performance artist in the tradition of "post-porn modernist" <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annie_Sprinkle">Annie Sprinkle.</a> That is why we're sitting across from each other on an airbed in the middle of an art gallery in San Francisco's Mission District. This peculiar scene of public domesticity -- with a reporter, no less -- is how she chose to close her recent group exhibit, "Building Our Own White Picket Fences," which explored family dynamics relating to queerness and sex work. Among Young's contributions to the show: An image of the red-haired BDSM star next to a blindfold and cutouts of combat boots – it's titled, "Pin the Combat Boots on the Queer Mommy." Another photo shows the award-winning BDSM star topless with a shot of a television covering one breast and an image of a milk carton covering the other, with a spinning arrow in-between. By the window, a wood swing is strung from the ceiling -- on the seat, upside-down pushpins spell out "family."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/mommy_is_a_love_artist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/mommy_is_a_love_artist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forget the fantasy of porn-free youth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/16/forget_the_fantasy_of_porn_free_youth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/16/forget_the_fantasy_of_porn_free_youth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10115244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.K. pursues the unrealistic aim of keeping X-rated material from minors]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brits have been in an uproar this week over a supposed attempt to ban Internet porn. But, despite initial reports suggesting that Prime Minister David Cameron was moving to censor all online adult material, the reality is that the U.K.'s top four Internet service providers <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/oct/11/david-cameron-porn-filter-isps?newsfeed=true">have agreed</a> to ask new customers to choose either unlimited access or "kid safe" surfing. In short, what we have here is just another case of adults foolishly attempting to prevent determined minors from accessing online pornography.</p><p>The U.S. has tried to do so, first with the Communications Decency Act and then the Child Online Protect Act, both of which were deemed unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. In 2000, Congress introduced the Children's Internet Protection Act (CIPA), which requires libraries and grade schools to use filtering software on computers in order to receive federal funding, and it made the constitutional cut (although debates over the measure, and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/29/library_porn/">the questions it leaves unanswered</a>, continue more than a decade later).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/16/forget_the_fantasy_of_porn_free_youth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/16/forget_the_fantasy_of_porn_free_youth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I love gay male porn</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/i_love_gay_male_porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/i_love_gay_male_porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Am I Normal?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10112373</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A straight woman has a thing for guy-on-guy action and wants to know: \"What\'s up with that?\"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I'm a straight woman, but I like watching gay male porn, especially where the men are supposed to be straight. It isn't something I'd want to pursue in my real sex life (I shudder, in a bad way, to think of my boyfriend hooking up with another guy), but in pure fantasy, it turns me on like no heterosexual porn ever has. What's up with that? Am I a freak?</strong></p><p>Just the other night, I had the bizarre experience of co-judging a classy, high-brow event called the Air Sex Championships. At one point during the show, a man going by the pseudonym "Sir Fucks A Lot" climbed onstage wearing a baseball cap, a muscle-hugging V-neck, cargo shorts and a cocky Casanova smile. He looked like a straight frat boy stereotype, but to everyone's great surprise he began enthusiastically enacting a gay sex scene -- and, reader, it was hot. For the only time that evening, the all-female judging panel leaned forward -- instead of recoiling in disgust -- to get a better look.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/i_love_gay_male_porn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/i_love_gay_male_porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

