<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Pornography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/pornography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:42:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Does porn cause violence?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/does_porn_cause_violence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/does_porn_cause_violence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morality in Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joseph Slade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Weitzer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298503</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Morality in Media says evidence proves that it does -- but the faith-based organization is wrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today a press release from Morality in Media celebrating a supposed "anti-porn initiative" landed in my inbox -- and you can imagine my shock at realizing that I actually agree with the conservative, faith-based organization on something. Which is to say that I too believe that it was appropriate for Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel to announce last week, following an outrageously high estimate of sexual assault within the armed forces, that all military workplaces would be searched for inappropriate sexual material that might contribute to a hostile work environment.</p><p>Enforcing basic sexual boundaries in the workplace is one thing. Blaming sexual assault on pornography, which is what the MIM press release goes on to do, is another. It reads, "Research overwhelmingly demonstrates a link between pornography consumption and increased sexual violence." What that sentence suggests is that there is a demonstrated link between porn-watching and an increase in perpetration of sexual violence -- and that is patently untrue. The availability of Internet porn has been <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=the-sunny-side-of-smut&amp;page=2 ">shown</a> to be associated with a <em>decrease</em> in sex crimes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/does_porn_cause_violence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/does_porn_cause_violence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worst porn ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farrah Abraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james deen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Backdoor teen Mom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291873</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I watched the "Teen Mom" porno so that you don't have to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can never say I didn't do anything nice for you, because I just sat through all 70 minutes of the newly released "Teen Mom" porno, so that you don't have to. (And seriously, I recommend <em>not</em>.)</p><p>The video, unoriginally titled "Backdoor Teen Mom," helps to confirm Farrah Abraham's costar <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/">James Deen's claim</a> that the scheme was to film the video in the style of a personal homemade sex tape and then pretend that it had been leaked against their will. (Shortly after filming it, he foiled that original plan by giving an honest answer to a reporter's probing question about the tape, which was being shopped around.) Deen is behind a hand-held camera for much of it; sometimes he sets it down down to catch the entire scene from a distance. Former "Teen Mom" star Abraham repeatedly calls him "baby" (actually, it's a grating whine of "baaayyybeeeee"), as though they're in an intimate relationship and not strangers filming a porno. At one point, she attempts to lead him up the stairs to the bedroom with, "Come on, boyfriend." She engages in baby talk -- "give me kisses," "come cuddle" -- that is creepily reminiscent of scenes of her interacting with her daughter on "Teen Mom." She even calls him "butthead" at one point.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/i_watched_the_teen_mom_porno/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bad day to be a porn lawyer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/porn_copyright_trolling_lawyers_get_busted/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/porn_copyright_trolling_lawyers_get_busted/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prenda Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sanctions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An angry judge -- and huge "Star Trek" fan -- blasts the sleazy Prenda Law firm into oblivion ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his <a href="http://ia601508.us.archive.org/28/items/gov.uscourts.cacd.543744/gov.uscourts.cacd.543744.130.0.pdf">"Order Issuing Sanctions"</a> on a half-dozen sleazy lawyers who specialized in pornography copyright litigation, California District Judge Otis D. Wright II writes like a man expecting the entire Internet to go gaga over his every word.</p><p>The opening two paragraphs deserve reprinting in full:</p><blockquote><p>Plaintiffs have outmaneuvered the legal system. They’ve discovered the nexus of antiquated copyright laws, paralyzing social stigma, and unaffordable defense costs. And they exploit this anomaly by accusing individuals of illegally downloading a single pornographic video. Then they offer to settle -- for a sum calculated to be just below the cost of a bare-bones defense. For these individuals, resistance is futile; most reluctantly pay rather than have their names associated with illegally downloading porn. So now, copyright laws originally designed to compensate starving artists allow starving attorneys in this electronic-media era to plunder the citizenry.</p> <p>Plaintiffs do have a right to assert their intellectual-property rights, so long as they do it right. But Plaintiffs filing of cases using the same boilerplate complaint against dozens of defendants raised the Courts alert. It was when the Court realized Plaintiffs engaged their cloak of shell companies and fraud that the Court went to battlestations.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/porn_copyright_trolling_lawyers_get_busted/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/porn_copyright_trolling_lawyers_get_busted/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Academia does porn</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/academia_does_porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/academia_does_porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An editor at the first peer-reviewed journal on smut talks about why the topic deserves scholarly attention]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If ever there was a sign of the mainstreaming of pornography, this is it: British publishing house Routledge is producing an academic journal about smut.</p><p>No, this is not the plot of another hot-for-teacher flick -- although here's hoping this journal begets its own porn parody. (I can picture it now: An orgiastic "peer-review process" and dialogue along the lines of, "I'll show you some inter<em>sex</em>tionality.) According to a recent <a href="http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/cfp/rprncfp.pdf">call for papers</a>, Porn Studies is "the first dedicated, international, peer-reviewed journal to critically explore those cultural products and services designated as pornographic and their cultural, economic, historical, institutional, legal and social contexts," with an emphasis on "sexuality, gender, race, class, age and ability."</p><p>The journal's editors, Feona Attwood and Clarissa Smith, are looking for papers that examine "specifically sexual and explicit media forms, their connections to wider media landscapes and their links to the broader spheres of (sex) work across historical periods and national contexts." The journal won't be published until spring of 2014 -- because peer review takes time, ya'll -- but select articles will be published online as they're ready. From the first issue, you can expect discussions of everything from obscenity trials to Australian manga to "how we think of fantasy in relation to porn," Smith told me by phone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/academia_does_porn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/academia_does_porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple named in Chinese porn probe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/apple_named_in_chinese_porn_probe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/apple_named_in_chinese_porn_probe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chinese porn probe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The computer giant allegedly peddled pornographic material through its web site and app store]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple's already <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/china_declares_war_on_apple_partner/">contentious</a> relationship with China has just taken a turn for the worse. <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2013/04/17/apple-named-in-china-porn-app-investigation/">The Wall Street Journal</a> is reporting that the computer giant has turned up on a list of companies named in a Chinese porn probe for allegedly offering illicit material on their web sites and app stores.</p><p>More from <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-57580002-37/apple-named-in-chinese-porn-probe/">CNET</a>:</p><blockquote><p>In total, the investigation is looking at 198 Web sites and several app stores beyond Apple's.</p> <p>Based solely on a <a href="http://translate.google.co.uk/translate?sl=zh-CN&amp;tl=en&amp;js=n&amp;prev=_t&amp;hl=en&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;eotf=1&amp;u=http%3A%2F%2Fpolitics.people.com.cn%2Fn%2F2013%2F0417%2Fc1001-21162677.html">rough Google-translated version of the People's Daily piece</a>, it's difficult to tell exactly what type of X-rated material has raised China's hackles.</p> <p>Apple is typically quite cautious about letting any "adult" content get through its app store approval process. And the company is usually quick to bar any app that violates its guidelines.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/apple_named_in_chinese_porn_probe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/apple_named_in_chinese_porn_probe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Teen Mom&#8221;: The porno</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 20:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james deen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farrah Abraham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex tape]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adult actor James Deen says reality-TV star Farrah Abraham wanted to stage a sex tape leak. She says he's lying]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, former "Teen Mom" star Farrah Abraham took to Twitter to deny <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/09/james-deen-farrah-abraham-sex-tape-plot/">allegations</a> that she had "concocted" a sex tape plot -- and to call porn star James Deen a [sic] "lier." In case you've missed the kerfuffle, a recap: Word surfaced yesterday that a sex tape featuring 20-year-old Abraham was being shopped around. Then a photograph circulated of her <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/08/farrah-abraham-sex-tape-james-deen-vivid-teen-mom/">holding hands</a> with porn star James Deen. Meanwhile, Abraham denied the existence of such a video and then vaguely threatened legal action. She told TMZ, "If I had my own personal stuff, that's my own personal thing." <em>Ohhkidoki.</em></p><p>But then Deen claimed that he had actually been hired by an unnamed porn company to film a video with Abraham. <em>He</em> <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2013/04/09/james-deen-farrah-abraham-sex-tape-plot/">told TMZ</a>, "I think what happened is that they were going to pass it off as a 'sex tape,'" he said. But then "somebody saw us coming out of a building together ... and people asked me what's going on ... and I have this problem where I can't really lie, so I was like, 'We're making a porno!'"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/teen_mom_the_porno/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Criminalizing &#8220;revenge porn&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/criminalizing_revenge_porn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/criminalizing_revenge_porn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenge porn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As more people post naked pics of exes, the law has failed to keep up. Some activists are trying to change that]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a woman does a Google search on her own name and up comes a page featuring a naked photo that she sent to an ex-boyfriend. There are links to her Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn account. In the comment thread, anonymous trolls critique every inch of her body. Perhaps her home phone number and address are also included. Say she contacts the local police in tears, only to be told that the post is perfectly legal -- or worse, that “boys will be boys.”</p><p>This is becoming an increasingly common scenario, activists say, given the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/hunter_moore_i_lied/">proliferation of “revenge porn"</a> and the legal system's failure to catch up with it.</p><p>A new bill in Florida is aiming to remedy that: It would make it a felony to publish online nude photos or videos of a person without their permission and along with identifying information. At the same time, activists around the country are petitioning for both state and federal laws to criminalize what they call “non-consensual porn.” A recent class action lawsuit filed by more than 20 women in Texas against revenge porn site Texxxan.com along with its host GoDaddy has only turned the heat up on the issue.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/criminalizing_revenge_porn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/criminalizing_revenge_porn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>129</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Real &#8220;spring breakers&#8221; don&#8217;t have happy endings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/real_spring_breakers_dont_have_happy_endings_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/real_spring_breakers_dont_have_happy_endings_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harmony Korine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[girls gone wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spring breakers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13255702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lost in Harmony Korine's fantasy: "Girls Gone Wild"-type appearances can scar women through their adult lives]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harmony Korine’s <em>Spring Breakers</em> exposes the darker inner regrets that fester beneath the intoxicating day-glo of girls going absolutely wild in the hypnotic Florida sunshine. But what about the real Girls Gone Wild, those sometimes-underage revelers caught permanently between beer-stained contracts and Joe Francis’ camera lens? What about the real young women whose acts of sex come with regrets? Haven’t we all -- especially in our youth -- found ourselves mentally suspended in moments of coercion, moments we smile through by rote? In <em>Spring Breakers</em>, those smiles are reflected back to us, glistening softly with the lipstick we’ve applied in the broken mirror that is America.</p><p>In <a href="http://www.alternet.org/culture/startling-spring-breakers-film-explores-sexual-coercion-turned-its-head">Spring Breakers</a>, director Harmony Korine viscerally captures the emotional, mental and sensual inner process of coercion, both when he shows Faith (Selena Gomez) nearly quaking under the weight of Alien’s (James Franco) sweet and sinister cajoling, and also when our leading coeds (Ashley Benson and Vanessa Hudgens) corner Alien, and the tables are turned. We watch Korine’s cast flawlessly embody those gray area experiences that young people in particular seem to stumble into—the moments when life mimics the artistic style of this film, and the only real explanation is: It’s just sort of how it all happened, that’s all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/real_spring_breakers_dont_have_happy_endings_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/real_spring_breakers_dont_have_happy_endings_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Die, troll, die&#8221; goes to court</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/die_troll_die_goes_to_court/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/die_troll_die_goes_to_court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prenda Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[identity theft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timothy lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet comments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13218411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prenda Law specializes in online pornography copyright infringement. Why does that make the Internet so mad?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who hasn't had the urge when reading Internet comments, at least once, to pull out a great big nail-studded mace and start whacking about at the idiots who gibber and froth online? Earlier this morning, when I saw <a href="https://twitter.com/binarybits/status/308600148462825474">Timothy Lee's tweet</a> referencing a case in which a law firm was suing some commenters for libel and defamation, my first thought was, <em>I totally get it.</em></p><p>The <a href="http://phillylawblog.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/prenda-law-complaint.pdf">complaint</a> is worth quoting extensively. (Emphases mine).</p><blockquote><p>Plaintiff files this action seeking monetary damages, injunctive relief and other damages arising from the <strong>egregious Internet-based conduct </strong> of a number of individuals, whom Plaintiff knows only by the <strong>anonymous, salacious, false and libelous comments</strong> they have made, and continue to make, about him on the Internet. Shielded by unconventional pseudonyms, [they] belong to a community of Internet "commentators," fearful of being identified, and have falsely accused the law firm Prenda Law LLC,of which Plaintiff is the sole officer and employee, of, among other things, <strong>criminal offenses; want of integrity in the discharge of employment; lack of ability in its profession; and the commission of fornication and adultery....</strong></p> <p>The Defendants' defamatory statements are made under the most cowardly of circumstances; plastered over centralized Internet communities and available to anyone in the world with an Internet connection. <strong>The Defendants have libeled Plaintiff under the disguise of such childish and unsophisticated pseudonyms as "die troll die."</strong> The defamatory statements that they have made about Plaintiff are the type that, if made under the light of day, would prompt loved ones to suggest (or intervene and force) <strong>intensive psychological therapy.</strong> But sheltered in a cloak of cowardly pseudonyms, emboldened by association [with] others apparently sharing the same affliction, Defendants have continued unabated in their conduct...</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/die_troll_die_goes_to_court/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/die_troll_die_goes_to_court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The feminist pornographer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/the_feminist_pornographer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/the_feminist_pornographer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13206753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tristan Taormino, editor of a new book on X-rated activism, says it's time to find a middle ground in the porn wars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was a time, not too long ago, when the idea of making porn for women was unthinkable. It was "completely unheard of," writes director Candida Royalle in the new anthology "The Feminist Porn Book: The Politics of Producing Pleasure." She founded Femme Productions in 1984, but when she went looking for distributors for her "female-oriented" films, she was patted on the head and told, "This is a boy's club."</p><p>Then in the '90s, fresh off the so-called feminist porn wars, the genre of “couples porn” began to boom. That gave the small cadre of female directors of the time opportunities in the mainstream male-dominated industry -- and “porn for women” began to seem less of an oxymoron. The next decade brought an explosion of feminist-minded pornographers -- from trans performer Buck Angel to actress-turned-director Madison Young -- as well as the creation of the Feminist Porn Awards. Since then we've seen the growth of explicit fan fiction -- and with it, a greater cultural awareness of female desire for sexual explicitness -- which has culminated in the global "Fifty Shades of Grey" phenomenon.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/the_feminist_pornographer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/the_feminist_pornographer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waxing our way to the ER</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/waxing_our_way_to_the_er/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/waxing_our_way_to_the_er/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brazilian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[body hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pubic hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jezebel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grooming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13193786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Grooming accidents are exploding. When did we start hating pubes?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just in case you still haven't read your December issue of Urology, here's the best piece of advice you'll get today: Don't drink and shave your pubes. You're welcome.</p><p>A new study from the University of California-San Diego reveals that "<a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/health/ouch-pubic-hair-care-sends-er-study-article-1.1257037">Emergency room visits due to pubic hair grooming mishaps,"</a> including <em>oh my God no no noooo</em> "lacerations," increased fivefold between 2002 and 2010, sending an impressive 11,704 pube-scapers to the E.R. The culprits? Scissors and hot wax did some of the damage, but plain-old non-electric-razors accounted for the lion's share, at 83 percent. Now if you'll excuse me, I'll be under my desk, rocking slowly back and forth and crying as I think about this.</p><p>The study also revealed that below-the-belt grooming isn't just for adult ladies anymore – men accounted for 43.3 percent of the injuries, and almost 30 percent of them were girls under the age of 18. To avoid becoming yet another harrowing grooming gone bad statistic, the researchers advise hair removal aficionados to "Pay attention to where you're placing that razor. Invest in a non-slip bath mat. And don't shave while under the influence of drugs or alcohol." Yeah, don't do that. For the love of God don't do that.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/waxing_our_way_to_the_er/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/waxing_our_way_to_the_er/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Porn: Marriage equality&#8217;s secret weapon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/porn_marriage_equalitys_secret_weapon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/porn_marriage_equalitys_secret_weapon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13193520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study links heterosexual men's porn consumption habits to the likelihood that they'll support gay marriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New <a href="http://crx.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/01/09/0093650212471558.abstract" target="_blank">research</a> published in the academic journal Communication Research found that, at least when it comes to straight men, watching porn makes you more likely to support gay marriage.</p><p>"Our study suggests that the more heterosexual men, especially less educated heterosexual men, watch pornography, the more supportive they become of same-sex marriage," Indiana University assistant professor and study co-author Paul Wright <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/study-watching-porn-boosts-support-for-same-sex-marriage/article/2520461/article/2520461" target="_hplink">told</a> the Washington Examiner.</p><p>According to <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/First-Time-Majority-Americans-Favor-Legal-Gay-Marriage.aspx" target="_blank">recent polls</a>, a majority of Americans now favor legalizing gay marriage, but straight men are still less likely to support it than straight women.</p><p>So what does porn do to change their minds?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/porn_marriage_equalitys_secret_weapon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/porn_marriage_equalitys_secret_weapon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vine: The future of sex?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/vine_the_future_of_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/vine_the_future_of_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13185517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's easy to imagine how the micro-video app could change sexting and amateur porn]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Twitter's new video-sharing app battles the inevitable <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/twitters_new_micro_video_app_is_predictably_flooded_with_porn/">proliferation of porn</a>, I can't help wondering what Vine could mean for the future of sexting and amateur smut. (I mean, aside from the prospect of an annoying new portmanteau to describe the act of digitally sharing naked media.) This question is admittedly a bit premature -- Vine, which limits clips to six seconds, doesn't offer a way to privately and directly share videos -- but it's easy to imagine such a development, if not on the part of the app's makers than by some enterprising tech vulture. And while the app has begun blocking searches for terms like "sex" and "NSFW," presumably to avoid violating Apple's puritanical standards, loads of X-rated material is still available; it's just harder to find. (One must know which accounts to follow, or get creative with keyword and username searches.) There's already at least <a href="http://nsfwvine.com">one independent NSFW site</a> compiling naughty vines, and the app's only been around for a few days.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/vine_the_future_of_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/31/vine_the_future_of_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>23 women file class-action lawsuit against revenge porn site</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/23_women_file_class_action_lawsuit_against_revenge_porn_site/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/23_women_file_class_action_lawsuit_against_revenge_porn_site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The suit seeks to prosecute the owners of Texxxan.com and hosting company GoDaddy -- and end a despicable trend]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In what is likely the first case of its kind, 23 women have joined a class-action lawsuit against the "revenge porn" website Texxxan.com.</p><p>Not sure what revenge porn is? Congratulations, you're a good person.</p><p>Revenge porn is what you get when jilted exes and one-time hookups submit photos and videos of their sexual exploits for public consumption. While some of the material on these sites has been stolen by strangers off of phones and computers, all of it has one big thing in common: The women in these photos and videos didn't consent to share them.</p><p>Hollie Toups, a 32-year-old resident of Beaumont, Texas, is one of those women. In addition to signing on to the lawsuit, she publicly came forward to discuss her experience with revenge porn in an effort to encourage other women to do the same.</p><p>As she <a href="http://betabeat.com/2013/01/victims-of-revenge-porn-mount-class-action-suit-against-godaddy-and-texxxan-com/" target="_blank">told</a> BetaBeat:</p><blockquote><p>“I live in an extremely small town and the website was flooded with people that I knew,” Ms. Toups said. “Those of us on there go to the grocery store and everybody recognizes you. Not everybody says something, but you get a lot of like, ‘Hey, do I know you?’ or, ‘I recognize you from somewhere.’ But then you also get people that will just come out and say it.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/23_women_file_class_action_lawsuit_against_revenge_porn_site/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/23_women_file_class_action_lawsuit_against_revenge_porn_site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does porn hurt relationships?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/does_porn_hurt_relationships/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/does_porn_hurt_relationships/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex counseling]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13177800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An unscientific new survey says it does. But experts argue that it can actually help]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking for further proof of the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/did_porn_warp_me_forever/">damaging effects of porn</a>? Lucky for you, the pre-eminent scientific journal Cosmopolitan magazine has weighed in with a survey purporting to show that porn is ruining sex.</p><p>I kid, of course. The glossy surveyed 68 "relationship experts" and found that the majority think X-rated material can harm relationships. The magazine also found that said experts believe porn damages women’s confidence, which is rich coming from a publication that inflames women's insecurities in order to sell them a consumerist wet dream. I’m not going to even address the countless glaring research flaws here -- that would be giving the survey far too much credit -- instead, this seems a good excuse to talk about about how porn can be used to the benefit of relationships.</p><p>This isn’t at all to negate the potential for porn to be legitimately damaging. Reasonable people can agree that mainstream porn, as with most popular media, often produces unrealistic aesthetics and expectations -- not to mention poor sex education and instruction, right? That's something worth discussing in a relationship, no doubt. But instead of condemning all erotic material as an enemy to sex, what about taking the more productive route of talking about how porn can actually be good for relationships.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/does_porn_hurt_relationships/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/does_porn_hurt_relationships/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sentencing in Bush-era porn prosecution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/sentencing_in_bush_era_porn_prosecution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/sentencing_in_bush_era_porn_prosecution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13173517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After a five-year legal battle, Ira Isaacs is given four years in federal prison for obscenity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After five years, the final Bush-era porn prosecution has come to an end. At least it appears so -- this <em>has</em> been the obscenity case with nine lives. Pornographer Ira Isaacs was sentenced Wednesday to four years in federal prison and fined $10,000, <a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_22383758/porn-producer-be-sentenced-obscenity-case%E2%80%9D">according to the Associated Press.</a></p><p>In case you missed my earlier reporting, Isaacs was prosecuted for obscenity after selling self-made “scat” movies -- which he claimed featured fake feces -- as well as a foreign producer’s bestiality film. At one point <a href="”http://www.salon.com/2012/02/28/my_obscenity_trial_subpoena/”">I was absurdly subpoenaed</a> by the federal government to testify in the trial, all thanks to having <a href="”http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/obscenity/”">interviewed</a> the fetish producer.</p><p>Today’s sentencing not only marks the end of this Bush-era holdover, but it also further illuminates judicial thinking on obscenity. U.S. District Judge George King said, “I have totally rejected during the course of the trial that he’s a shock artist," he said. "He has cloaked himself as a First Amendment defendant. But the fact is that he did it for money.” King added, “He's not a defender of the First Amendment. He cheapens the First Amendment."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/sentencing_in_bush_era_porn_prosecution/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/sentencing_in_bush_era_porn_prosecution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did porn warp me forever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/did_porn_warp_me_forever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/did_porn_warp_me_forever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2013 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13168302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like other boys my age, I grew up with unlimited access to smut. At 23, I wonder if it's totally screwed me up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was the era of Kazaa and we knew no better. Among my group of male friends at my austere private elementary school, watching, discussing and even sharing pornography became a sexual outlet. With the ease of downloading, we would burn CDs and swap them in school with “clever” titles taken from some album with a vague penis reference (like Will Smith’s ignominious “Big Willie Style”). That way, we could talk about porn in public, asking each other on field trips, “What did you think of that new Craig David CD I burned for you?” The “inside joke” rose to evil middle-school comic genius when other students bought the actual music albums to get in on the trend. It was a typical preteen hijink, except that the images on those CDs were far more raw than the traditional Playboy pin-up.</p><p>Both of my parents were shrinks, and even though I was generally comfortable talking about sex in my household, porn — especially the porn I was watching — just had to be taboo. It was inexplicably gross, divorced from the concept of sex as it had been explained to me. If sex was a man inserting his penis into a woman’s vagina, then how did girls drinking cum out of champagne glasses fit into that picture? Because of its unspeakable nature, Internet porn became inextricably linked with the anxiety of being caught.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/did_porn_warp_me_forever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/13/did_porn_warp_me_forever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>237</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-gay activist lawyer guilty of child pornography after videotaping daughter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/anti_gay_activist_guilty_of_child_pornography_after_videotaping_daughter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/anti_gay_activist_guilty_of_child_pornography_after_videotaping_daughter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Poverty Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Gay Activism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13168657</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lisa Biron faces 25 years in prison for filming her 14-year-old having sex with two men on multiple occasions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.splcenter.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/splc_180.jpeg" alt="The Southern Poverty Law Center" align="left" /></a> A New Hampshire lawyer who works with a virulently anti-gay Christian-right organization has been found guilty of child pornography charges after videotaping her own daughter having sex with two men on multiple occasions.</p><p>Lisa Biron, 43, of Manchester faces a minimum sentence of 25 years in prison after a jury convicted her yesterday. The jury deliberated for less than an hour.</p><p>Biron, arrested by the FBI last November, was accused of eight felony counts involving the videotaping of men having sex with a 14-year-old girl who was identified by the Associated Press as her daughter. She also allegedly made a cellphone video of herself having sex with her daughter.</p><p>Biron, who claimed on her Facebook page (which was taken down, according to the Concord Monitor) that the Bible was her favorite book, had worked with Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), formerly the Alliance Defense Fund, in defending a Pentecostal church in Concord in a tax fight against the city.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/anti_gay_activist_guilty_of_child_pornography_after_videotaping_daughter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/anti_gay_activist_guilty_of_child_pornography_after_videotaping_daughter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China’s schizophrenic sexual revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/china%e2%80%99s_schizophrenic_sexual_revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/china%e2%80%99s_schizophrenic_sexual_revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brothels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nation's government is letting brothels proliferate, so why is pornography still under attack?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a><br /> The brothel downstairs from my Shanghai apartment, like so many similar establishments across China, masqueraded as a foot massage parlor. But only the densest or most desperate massage seeker would have mistaken it for a purveyor of the painful rubdowns prescribed in traditional Chinese medicine. Most nights young women in short shorts and exaggerated makeup lounged in the massage chairs in varying degrees of boredom, and the space was lit in pink. The imprint of a foot on the placard outside was about all that kept up the ruse.</p><p>As far as neighbors went, the sex workers were fine — quiet, courteous, not prone to cooking stinky tofu. The few times my clothes fell from the bamboo poles used to dry laundry in China, they saved the garments for me until I could make the trek downstairs to retrieve them. We didn’t share an entrance, though a window in the back of the parlor opened onto my stairwell, and on my way home on hot nights I would see the women brushing their teeth. (Even the room that doubled as a kitchen and bathroom glowed fuchsia.) As the years passed I rarely had reason to think about the brothel. But it remained a difficult thing to explain to overseas guests, invariably evoking one of those questions about China that evade any quick, pat answer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/china%e2%80%99s_schizophrenic_sexual_revolution/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/china%e2%80%99s_schizophrenic_sexual_revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better than actual porn!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex and love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boom in X-rated animated photos and GIFs may evidence shrinking attention spans, but they're unlikely to take over]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that X-rated GIFs had truly come of age when porn star Kimberly Kane <a href="https://twitter.com/kimberlykane/status/276576034986532865">tweeted</a> earlier this week that they were "better than actual porn." I'd heard similar proclamations from pornoisseur friends, but a celebrated adult performer calling it the pinnacle of smut? Now that is something.</p><p>For those of you who are visiting the World Wide Web for the first time ever, a GIF is a <a href="http://www.techterms.com/definition/gif">static or animated, looped image</a> that's been compressed for quick loading. The rest of you have probably come across your fair share of GIFs showing <a href="http://www.gifbin.com/981986">dramatic reactions</a>, <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/fjelstud/the-definitive-collection-of-cat-gifs">catly shenanigans</a>, <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/the-animated-gif-guide-to-hillary-clintons-adorab">dancing politicians</a> or Ryan Gosling doing <a href="http://www.vh1.com/celebrity/2011-08-08/the-ultimate-ryan-gosling-gif-wall/">any number of things.</a> Most GIFs are meant for laughs, but, increasingly, they're being designed to tickle a different bone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
