<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > President Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/president_obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 18:00:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>4 reasons why Obama should push for a carbon tax</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even a minor tax would create jobs and federal revenue, not to mention help the environment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/next-new-deal-logo_resize.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a> We are at an unacknowledged turning point for the economy and the environment. We could, right now, substantially reduce our debt and deficit projections, take a major step toward a better environment, create a simpler and fairer tax system, make job creation easier, and raise economic growth a bit. For all of these reasons, we could and should adopt a carbon tax.</p><p>Taking this step depends on two men: President Obama and Senator Max Baucus, chair of the Senate Finance Committee. Both men want to leave an important legacy, and both are in a unique political position: they still possess real political power, but neither will ever face another election. (Obama, of course, is limited to two terms, and Baucus has just announced that he will retire.) Acting together, the two of them could completely change the odds of enacting a carbon tax this year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/four_reasons_why_obama_should_push_for_a_carbon_tax_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama says Gitmo should be closed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/update_at_100_days_obama_talks_syria_boston_and_congressional_gridlock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/update_at_100_days_obama_talks_syria_boston_and_congressional_gridlock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guantanamo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In briefing, president vows to "reengage with Congress" to change detention policy. Also discusses Boston and Syria]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a press conference on the 100th day of his second term (though his administration dismissed the symbolic nature of the date), President Obama said he would work with Congress to stop the detention of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay, also answering questions on his "red line" in Syria, the sequester and endless congressional gridlock.</p><p><strong>On Guantánamo  </strong></p><p>Facing questions about the ongoing hunger strike at Guantánamo, Obama said he was "not surprised there are problems," saying that he continues to believe the U.S. should prioritize closing Guantánamo, as it is "not necessary to keep America safe, is expensive, hurts our relationships with allies and is a recruitment tool for extremists."</p><p>Obama said he planned to "go back to" his efforts in 2008 to close Guantánamo, saying: "I am going to reengage with Congress to make the case that this is not in the best interest of the American people," calling the detention facility and the indefinite detention of people who have not been tried or charged "contrary to who we are, contrary to our interests, and it needs to stop."</p><p><strong>On Syria</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/update_at_100_days_obama_talks_syria_boston_and_congressional_gridlock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/update_at_100_days_obama_talks_syria_boston_and_congressional_gridlock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Latest from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/liveblog_latest_from_boston/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/liveblog_latest_from_boston/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 14:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laguardia Airport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Richard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Richard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Krystle M. Campbell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stock Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pressure cooker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LIVEBLOG: Stock markets gain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated: </strong>5:01 p.m.</p><p>The organizing body pledges to run the maration next year. Here's the complete statement from Thomas Grilk, Executive Director of the Boston Athletic Association.</p><blockquote><p>The Boston Athletic Association (B.A.A.) extends its deepest sympathies to all those who were affected by Monday's tragic events. Those who lost their lives and were injured are in our thoughts and prayers.</p> <p>It is a sad day for the City of Boston, for the running community, and for all those who were here to enjoy the 117th running of the Boston Marathon. What was intended to be a day of joy and celebration quickly became a day in which running a marathon was of little importance.</p> <p>We want to express our deepest gratitude to all of the B.A.A. medical personnel and volunteers and the City of Boston’s first responders who reacted so courageously to help save lives. Special thanks to the loyal Boston Marathon community – over 8500 volunteers, 1000 medical personnel, the organizing committee, and hundreds of thousands along the race route – who make the experience what it is for all our runners, who are hurting today.</p> <p>We would like to thank the countless people from around the world who have reached out to support us over the last 24 hours.</p> <p>We are cooperating with the City of Boston, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and all federal law enforcement officials in the investigation and the effort to bring those responsible for this tragedy to justice, so we are limited in what information we can provide.</p> <p>Boston is strong. Boston is resilient. Boston is our home. And Boston has made us enormously proud in the past 24 hours. The Boston Marathon is a deeply held tradition – an integral part of the fabric and history of our community. We are committed to continuing that tradition with the running of the 118th Boston Marathon in 2014.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/liveblog_latest_from_boston/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/liveblog_latest_from_boston/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s senseless Social Security cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/obamas_social_security_cuts_arent_just_unwise_theyre_unnecessary_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/obamas_social_security_cuts_arent_just_unwise_theyre_unnecessary_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a rapidly shrinking deficit, Obama's plan to shred our social safety net is as unwise as it is unnecessary]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/next-new-deal-logo_resize.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a> The reason President Obama's proposal to cut Social Security benefits is tragic is that it is simply not necessary. His plan is to use a different method to compute how benefits are raised to offset inflation. But Social Security will add very little to federal spending over the next 30 to 40 years. As a proportion of national income (GDP), It will rise from 5 percent to 6 percent. At the same time, retirees are set to get much less money from their pensions because so many were forced to depend on 401(k)s and defined contribution plans rather than traditional pensions with defined benefits.</p><p>But a new report from Goldman Sachs economists puts the Obama decision in an even harsher light. The federal deficit is coming down rapidly on its own. In a piece entitled, “<a href="http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2013/04/the-rapidly-shrinking-federal-deficit.html" target="_blank">The Rapidly Shrinking Federal Deficit</a>,” Goldman notes that the deficit averaged 4.5 percent of GDP in the first calendar quarter, compared to 10.1 percent in fiscal year 2009. The reasons are faster economic growth, higher taxes and reduced government spending.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/obamas_social_security_cuts_arent_just_unwise_theyre_unnecessary_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/13/obamas_social_security_cuts_arent_just_unwise_theyre_unnecessary_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOP campaign chair&#8217;s surprising defense of Medicare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/is_greg_walden_so_conservative_hes_actually_a_liberal_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/is_greg_walden_so_conservative_hes_actually_a_liberal_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 16:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greg walden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Cantor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269075</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Walden has labeled the president's new budget plan a "shocking attack on seniors"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The President’s offer to cut spending on Medicare and Social Security is confusing some conservatives.  In the past, they’ve of course labeled such cuts a sign of Seriousness but his budget caught them off balance.  And yes, that’s very weird because he’s had the Medicare cuts in earlier budgets and the Social Security cut (chained CPI) in his fiscal cliff offer to Boehner.</p><p>Anyway, initial responses ranged from the incoherent—”I don’t see this as fundamental entitlement reform as much as clarifying a statistic which does happen to save money” (Paul Ryan)—to the opportunistic “Let’s set aside our differences and come together on things we can agree on” (Eric Cantor saying let’s do CPI but not the higher tax revenues in the budget)—to the faux-outraged House GOP campaign chair Greg Walden who labeled the President’s budget a “shocking attack on seniors.”</p><p>It’s that last part where things got weird today.  As the WaPo <a href="http://jaredbernsteinblog.com/wp-admin/post-new.php">reports</a>, Boehner and Cantor are distancing themselves from Walden, since they want these cuts.  And the very conservative Club for Growth…</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/is_greg_walden_so_conservative_hes_actually_a_liberal_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/is_greg_walden_so_conservative_hes_actually_a_liberal_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is Bush still controlling social insurance?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bushs_approach_to_social_insurance_still_rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bushs_approach_to_social_insurance_still_rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 10:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["grand bargain"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retirement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President Obama threatens his legacy by continuing the Bush approach to healthcare and retirement security]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to reports, President Barack Obama hopes that his legacy may include a “grand bargain” in which Republicans agree to tax increases on the rich if Democrats will agree to cuts in benefits for the elderly, including cuts to Social Security brought about by “chained CPI” (a different way to adjust Social Security benefits for inflation).</p><p>Here is the president’s idea of shared sacrifice among the many and the few (courtesy of <a href="http://www.cepr.net/index.php/blogs/beat-the-press/president-obama-proposes-a-bigger-hit-to-seniors-than-to-the-rich">Dean Baker</a>):</p><p><img alt="btp-chained-cpi-obama" src="http://www.cepr.net/images/stories/blogs/btp-chained-cpi-obama.jpg" height="329" width="488" /></p><p>Barack Obama proposes a painful hit to middle-class and working-class seniors, in return for an increase on taxes on the rich so small that they will hardly notice. Bargain? Yes. Grand? Not so much.</p><p>By legitimating changes that could lead over time to the conversion of Social Security into a means-tested program for the elderly poor only, Barack Obama has proven himself to be a true and worthy successor of his predecessor, George W. Bush.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bushs_approach_to_social_insurance_still_rules/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/bushs_approach_to_social_insurance_still_rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Best of the Salon limerick contest</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Apr 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salon limerick contest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon Limerick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seamus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seamus the dog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rafalca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13263264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Part 1: The election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">in the first compilation of the Salon limerick contest, here are the best reader submitted limericks from the election:</p><p dir="ltr">As travel arrangements were set,</p><p dir="ltr">Rafalca had reason to fret,</p><p dir="ltr">When Romney explained,</p><p dir="ltr">To get to the Games,</p><p dir="ltr">She'd be strapped to the roof of the jet!</p><p dir="ltr">Pete DeVriese</p><p dir="ltr">Oakland, Calif.</p><p><strong><strong><br /> </strong></strong></p><p dir="ltr">The Romney's were off with a start.</p><p dir="ltr">Regrettably, Seamus had farts.</p><p dir="ltr">So into the crate,</p><p dir="ltr">If he makes it that's great.</p><p dir="ltr">If not, Mitt will sell off the parts.</p><p dir="ltr">Michael Peterson</p><p dir="ltr">Willowbrook, Ill.</p><p><strong><strong><br /> </strong></strong></p><p dir="ltr">Mitt’s not vulgar, profane or salacious.</p><p dir="ltr">He would never offend! Good gracious!</p><p dir="ltr">But in unctuous perfection,</p><p dir="ltr">He seeks his election,</p><p dir="ltr">In a manner sublimely mendacious.</p><p dir="ltr">Quentin Sullivan</p><p dir="ltr">Haverhill, Mass.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p dir="ltr">Paul Ryan is sure that it's true.</p><p dir="ltr">All abortions are wicked to do.</p><p dir="ltr">Not for rape, or incest,</p><p dir="ltr">Even death - Paul knows best.</p><p dir="ltr">For a zygote's worth much more than you.</p><p dir="ltr">Paul Bamborough</p><p dir="ltr">Norway</p><p><strong><strong><br /> </strong></strong></p><p dir="ltr">RNC speakers begin to assemble,</p><p dir="ltr">And their rhetoric starts to dissemble.</p><p dir="ltr">From Rubio to Ryan.</p><p dir="ltr">There'll be no shortage of lyin'.</p><p dir="ltr">Causing fact-checkers all over to tremble.</p><p dir="ltr">Jim Brown</p><p dir="ltr">Scarsdale, N.Y.</p><p><strong><strong><br /> </strong></strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/07/best_of_the_salon_limerick_contest/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mr. President, you won the election, not them!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/bad_ideas_that_just_won%e2%80%99t_die/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/bad_ideas_that_just_won%e2%80%99t_die/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlement cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13256996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama’s new budget will reportedly include GOP's beloved entitlement cuts. Why he's overlooking the real solution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama’s 2012 campaign manager, Jim Messina, is a politics-over-policy guy. So it was interesting to hear him confess to ABC News last week that he only had two <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/03/jim-messina-reflects-on-white-knuckle-moments-of-2012-obama-campaign/">“white knuckle moments”</a> during the reelection push – and one of them was after the awful August 2011 debt-ceiling deal (the other was Obama’s poor showing in the first debate, which rabid Obama defenders insisted was a fiction made up by Chris Matthews).</p><p>Of course, Messina’s reaction to the debt-ceiling deal had to do with politics, not policy, but it’s still revealing. “After the August debt-limit crisis … our numbers were, you know, historically low,” the political whiz said.</p><p>Indeed. After Obama and GOP leaders made a deal to avert a default – resulting in the ugly sequester cuts that are currently taking their toll on the economy as well as on Obama’s popularity – the president’s approval rating reached an all-time low. Gallup tracking polls had him at 39 percent in mid-August, which was the first time he’d dipped below the treacherous 40 percent mark as president.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/bad_ideas_that_just_won%e2%80%99t_die/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/bad_ideas_that_just_won%e2%80%99t_die/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>155</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liz Cheney denounces political melodrama in melodramatic editorial</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/liz_cheney_denounces_political_melodrama_in_melodramatic_editorial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/liz_cheney_denounces_political_melodrama_in_melodramatic_editorial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2013 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liz Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13255839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cheney hates President Obama's sky-is-falling paranoia, but also wants you to know that the sky is falling ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is something that makes Liz Cheney really mad: the Obama White House and its brand of "sky-is-falling melodrama normally reserved for the lives of teenage girls."</p><p>Here is something else that makes the former vice president's eldest daughter really mad: that President Obama is "the most radical man ever to occupy the Oval Office" who has "launched a war on religious freedom" and has effectively told America's enemies that they can "attack us with impunity" and "suffer no consequences."</p><p>Want the short version? Obama is making THE SKY FALL.</p><p>Barring the possibility that Cheney's <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324105204578384692398126294.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop" target="_blank">editorial in Friday's Wall Street Journal</a> is an exquisite piece of satire, it appears the former Bush State Department official lacks a certain self-awareness.</p><p>Let's consider Cheney's assessments of the Obama administration's record.</p><p>On foreign policy:</p><blockquote><p>The president has so effectively diminished American strength abroad that there is no longer a question of whether this was his intent.</p></blockquote><p>On Libya:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/liz_cheney_denounces_political_melodrama_in_melodramatic_editorial/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/29/liz_cheney_denounces_political_melodrama_in_melodramatic_editorial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama needs a new joke writer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/president_obama_needs_a_new_joke_writer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/president_obama_needs_a_new_joke_writer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gridiron dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13224595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nicest thing to say about his Gridiron Dinner appearance is that hopefully his staff had other priorities]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama appeared as the entertainment at last night’s Gridiron Dinner.  The roaster-in-chief walks a fine line at these drunken Beltway confabs. Too often jokes in Washington are too inside baseball or not inside enough, viz. this <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/03/10/remarks-president-gridiron-dinner">groaner</a> he launched from the podium:</p><blockquote><p>As you know, I last attended the Gridiron dinner two years ago.  Back then, I addressed a number of topics — a dysfunctional Congress, a looming budget crisis, complaints that I don’t spend enough time with the press.  It’s funny, it seems like it was just yesterday. (Laughter.)</p></blockquote><p>The transcript, when read sober, was hardly more inspiring. Parentheticals asserting laughter and applause appeared on the official White House transcript and could not be independently verified:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/president_obama_needs_a_new_joke_writer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/president_obama_needs_a_new_joke_writer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Showdown fatigue</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/showdown_fatigue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/showdown_fatigue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13208908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are Americans, including big business, too tired for outrage?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’re one week away from a massive cut in federal spending — cuts that will hurt millions of lower-income Americans who’ll lose nutrition assistance, housing and money for their schools, among other things; that will furlough or lay off millions of government employees, reduce inspections of the nation’s meat and poultry and pharmaceuticals and workplaces, eliminate the jobs of hundreds of thousands of people working for government contractors, and, according to Leon Panetta and other military leaders, seriously compromise the nation’s defenses.</p><p>Bad enough. If the spending cuts go through next week our fragile economy will slow further, causing more unemployment and misery. When consumers don’t have the money to buy enough to keep the economy moving, and government pulls back this much, businesses can’t justify keeping people on.</p><p>Yet the silence is deafening.</p><p>Republicans won’t deal. Obama has already cut $1.5 trillion out of the budget but Republicans insist on far more. They want the White House to propose major cuts in Social Security and Medicare.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/showdown_fatigue/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/22/showdown_fatigue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What message did SOTU send to women?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/what_message_did_sotu_send_to_women_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/what_message_did_sotu_send_to_women_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2013 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13202148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In his address, the president appealed to an integral voting bloc: Women ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The State of the Union address is inherently a political exercise, intended to chart a course for governing but also to let important constituencies know that they are heard and valued. On Tuesday night, President Obama seemed intent on sounding down-to-earth, sensible, unthreatening, and easy to understand. He presented a long list of concrete proposals as if there couldn’t be any disagreement over their merits.<br /> <a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a></p><p>For women, a critical voting bloc who helped deliver his second term, the president checked off many important boxes. He spoke about ending violence against women, guaranteeing them equal pay, preventing teen pregnancy, providing working families with more daycare and early child education, and promoting military women in combat roles. He also acknowledged that women around the world are drivers of prosperity and must be empowered if we hope to reduce global poverty and secure emerging democracies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/what_message_did_sotu_send_to_women_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/15/what_message_did_sotu_send_to_women_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When John Boehner just sat there</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/the_night_john_boehner_just_sat_there/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/the_night_john_boehner_just_sat_there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 03:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the union 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13199432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama backed preschool, jobs, keeping kids alive and helping a 102-year-old vote; GOP not impressed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama’s State of the Union speech showed that the progressive energy of his second inaugural address wasn’t just a man getting carried away by the moment. On Tuesday night, he outlined an ambitious second-term agenda: a commitment to universal preschool, raising the federal minimum wage, executive action on climate change, a strong jobs agenda, easing barriers to voting, tough new gun laws. The president won’t get everything he’s asking for, not even most of it, and some of the details of what he wants and how he’ll achieve it were sketchy, but it was rewarding to see him ask.</p><p>And while Obama talked deficit reduction early in the speech, it was much less detailed and central than in most of his other big national speeches. “Deficit reduction alone is not an economic plan,” he said, stating what should be obvious, but often isn’t inside the Beltway. He even went partway toward greater accountability on his controversial drone program – although he didn’t use the word "drones" – promising to work with Congress on oversight and transparency. Not enough, but a start.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/the_night_john_boehner_just_sat_there/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/13/the_night_john_boehner_just_sat_there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dick Cheney helps his cousin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/dick_cheney_helps_his_cousin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/dick_cheney_helps_his_cousin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13197855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His trashing the president reminds liberals that Obama isn’t quite “Cheney-lite” on national security. Updated]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Updated below.)</p><p>With new friends like John Bolton, who recently praised President Obama’s targeted killing policy as “consistent with and really derived from the Bush administration approach to the War on Terror,” Obama needs some old-fashioned enemies. Just in time, Dick Cheney breaks his months of silence with a slashing, over-the-top speech denouncing Obama’s national security nominees as “second-rate” and charging, again, that he’s making the country less safe.</p><p>"The performance now of Barack Obama as he staffs up the national security team for the second term is dismal," Cheney said in comments to about 300 members of the Wyoming Republican Party reported by the Associated Press on Sunday.</p><p>"Frankly, what he has appointed are second-rate people," he said, for the positions of secretary of state, secretary of defense and CIA director -- John Kerry, Chuck Hagel and John Brennan, to be precise.</p><p>Predictably the top neocon had the toughest words for Defense nominee Hagel, even though they’re both Republicans. Cheney joined the realm of conspiracy theorists by suggesting that Obama picked Hagel so he has “a Republican that he can use to take the heat for what he plans to do to the Department of Defense." That’s a new one.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/dick_cheney_helps_his_cousin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/dick_cheney_helps_his_cousin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recognizing American privilege</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/recognizing_american_privilege/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/recognizing_american_privilege/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American privilege]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kill Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeted killings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone Attacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13194175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can we have empathy for our fellow citizens and our president, as well as those killed in drone wars? We have to]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I pretty much always agree with the Daily Beast’s Michael Tomasky. Just last week I hailed <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2013/02/04/hillary-clinton-exits-politics-her-enduring-legacy.html">his article appraising Hillary Clinton’s political career (to date)</a> as the best of a lot of great profiles. But I had just as strong a reaction, only this time a negative one, to <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/02/06/obama-and-the-justice-department-memo.html">his Wednesday piece</a> on the Obama administration’s “white paper” on targeted killings of American citizens. It got me thinking more deeply about the debates I’ve been having with liberals and progressives on this issue over the last couple of years.</p><p>Tomasky opened by admitting that whenever he’s evaluating a politician’s actions, he’s always written “with part of my brain focused on the question of what I would do if I were in Politician X’s position. This line of thought came so naturally to me that I imagined everyone did this. But I guess everyone doesn’t.”</p><p>No, everyone doesn’t. I do sometimes, and not others. But it’s a worthwhile thought exercise. Tomasky continues, noting that he’d just read the targeted killing white paper, and:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/recognizing_american_privilege/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/recognizing_american_privilege/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s head speechwriter stepping down, may pursue screenwriting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/obamas_head_speechwriter_stepping_down_may_pursue_screenwriting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/obamas_head_speechwriter_stepping_down_may_pursue_screenwriting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Favreau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Speechwriter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13191620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Favreau, 31, is leaving the White House come March]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ever since he's been in the White House, Obama speechwriter Jon Favreau seemed destined for Hollywood. He's dated "Parks and Recreation" actress Rashida Jones, was voted among the world's most beautiful by People magazine (and one of the most influential by Time) and, while still in his 20s, managed to inspire a "White House Gone Wild" headline when the media got hold of a shirtless pic of him playing a drinking game.</p><p>Now the 31-year-old, who has been Barack Obama's head speechwriter for seven years, is stepping down. <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-speechwriter-20130205,0,6789361.story">The L.A. Times reports</a> that after March 1, the young writer is likely to pursue a career in screenwriting, following the footsteps of former White House staffer, now "1600 Penn" writer, Jon Lovett. Obama adviser David Plouffe told the LA Times that Favreau would be well-equipped for a career in Hollywood. "He can write comedy, history, drama, suspense," Plouffe said. "He's got the whole range."</p><p>Favreau, however, plans to stay in Washington for the time being and has not commented on his departure. He will be replaced by Chicago native Cody Keenan, who the Times reports "is known for his handling of heartbreak and sadness."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/obamas_head_speechwriter_stepping_down_may_pursue_screenwriting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/obamas_head_speechwriter_stepping_down_may_pursue_screenwriting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House releases photo of Obama firing gun</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/white_house_releases_photo_of_obama_firing_gun/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/white_house_releases_photo_of_obama_firing_gun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skeet shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camp David]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/white_house_releases_photo_of_obama_firing_gun/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The picture comes a week after an interview mentioned his fondness for skeet shooting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The White House has released a photo of President Barack Obama firing a gun, two days before he heads to Minnesota to discuss gun control.</p><p>In a recent interview with The New Republic magazine, Obama said "yes" when asked if he has ever fired a gun. He said "we do skeet shooting all the time," except for his daughters, at Camp David, the presidential retreat in Maryland.</p><p>The White House photo released Saturday is dated Aug. 4, 2012, and shows Obama shooting at clay targets on the range at Camp David.</p><p>The rifle is cocked in Obama's left shoulder, his left index finger is on the trigger and smoke is coming from the barrel.</p><p>Obama is pushing a package of gun-control measures in response to the Newtown, Conn., school shooting.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/white_house_releases_photo_of_obama_firing_gun/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/white_house_releases_photo_of_obama_firing_gun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama talks football, guns and war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/obama_talks_football_guns_and_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/obama_talks_football_guns_and_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Republic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13183352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five takeaways from President Obama's interview with The New Republic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New Republic’s redesign has arrived and the magazine has released its cover interview with President Obama, conducted by publisher and editor in chief Chris Hughes and editor Franklin Foer. Hughes, who helped to found Facebook and later worked for President Obama's 2008 campaign, bought the venerable magazine last year and is behind its new found musculature.</p><p>Much of the <a href="http://www.newrepublic.com/article/112190/obama-interview-2013-sit-down-president">transcript</a> delves into Washington minutiae like Speaker of the House John Boehner’s ability to control his Republican caucus and the media’s flawed desire to find moral equivalence between the parties. But it also contained a few more far-reaching revelations. Here are five:</p><p><strong>1. On the difference between Democrats and Republicans:</strong><br /> "Democrats, we've got a lot of warts, and some of the bad habits here in Washington when it comes to lobbyists and money and access really goes to the political system generally. It's not unique to one party. But when it comes to certain positions on issues, when it comes to trying to do what's best for the country, when it comes to really trying to make decisions based on fact as opposed to ideology, when it comes to being willing to compromise, the Democrats, not just here in this White House, but I would say in Congress also, have shown themselves consistently to be willing to do tough things even when it's not convenient, because it's the right thing to do. And we haven't seen that same kind of attitude on the other side."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/obama_talks_football_guns_and_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/27/obama_talks_football_guns_and_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>11-year-old to Obama: Trans people matter, too!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/11_year_old_to_obama_trans_people_matter_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/11_year_old_to_obama_trans_people_matter_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2013 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transgender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transgender rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13179642</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A transgender tween tells the president why her rights should matter to all Americans ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like so many others on Monday, Sadie was thrilled when President Obama spoke of the Stonewall uprising in the same breath as Selma and Seneca Falls, directly addressing gay rights in his inaugural address.</p><p>"Our journey is not complete until our gay brothers and sisters are treated like anyone else under the law," the president said.</p><p>But as an 11-year-old trans girl, Sadie couldn't help thinking something important was missing from his speech: transgender rights.</p><p>So she put pen to paper and wrote an addendum for the president, hoping to tell him a little about her experience of growing up trans:</p><blockquote><p>"The world would be a better place if everyone had the right to be themselves, including people who have a creative gender identity and expression. Transgender people are not allowed the freedom to do things everyone else does, like go to the doctor, go to school, get a job, and even make friends.</p> <p>Transgender kids like me are not allowed to go to most schools because the teachers think we are different from everyone else. The schools get afraid of how they will talk with the other kids' parents, and transgender kids are kept secret or told not to come there anymore. Kids are told not to be friends with transgender kids, which makes us very lonely and sad.</p> <p>When they grow up, transgender adults have a hard time getting a job because the boss thinks the customers will be scared away. Doctors are afraid of treating transgender patients because they don't know how to take care of them, and some doctors don't really want to help them. Transgender patients like me travel to other states to see a good doctor.</p> <p>It would be a better world if everyone knew that transgender people have the same hopes and dreams as everyone else. We like to make friends and want to go to school. Transgender people want to get good jobs and go to doctors like they are exactly the same. It really isn't that hard to like transgender people because we are like everyone else."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/11_year_old_to_obama_trans_people_matter_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/23/11_year_old_to_obama_trans_people_matter_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Sandy Hook was different</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/poll_sandy_hook_was_different/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/poll_sandy_hook_was_different/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown school shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13175410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A majority of Americans -- 54 percent -- want gun control laws tightened, up markedly from 39 percent last year ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The massacre of 20 children and 6 adults at Sandy Hook Elementary has dramatically swayed Americans’ views on guns, galvanizing the broadest support for stricter gun laws in nearly a decade, says a new poll by the New York Times and CBS News. The poll found that 54 percent of Americans support stricter gun control laws, up from only 39 percent last April.</p><p>The push to tighten up gun laws stretched across political lines -- including a dramatic 18-point increase among Republicans. A majority of independents now also back stricter gun laws.</p><p>As <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/18/us/poll-shows-school-shooting-sways-views-on-guns.html?ref=todayspaper" target="_blank">reported</a> by the Times:</p><blockquote><p>The idea of requiring background checks on all gun purchases, which would eliminate a provision that allows about 40 percent of guns to be sold by unlicensed sellers without checks, was overwhelmingly popular. Nine in 10 Americans would favor such a law, the poll found — including 9 in 10 of the respondents who said that there was a gun in their household, and 85 percent whose households include National Rifle Association members.</p> <p>A ban on high-capacity magazines, like the 15- and 30-round magazines that have been used in several recent mass shootings, was supported by more than 6 in 10, and by a majority of those who live in households with guns. And just over half of all respondents, 53 percent, said they would support a ban on some semiautomatic weapons.</p> <p>After the mass shootings at Virginia Tech in 2007 and Tucson in 2011, polls found that 47 percent of Americans favored stricter gun laws.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/poll_sandy_hook_was_different/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/18/poll_sandy_hook_was_different/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>