<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Psychology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/psychology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:36:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Book of Woe&#8221;: Psychiatry&#8217;s last stand</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/the_book_of_woe_psychiatrys_last_stand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/the_book_of_woe_psychiatrys_last_stand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must-Do]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSM-5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychiatry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Illness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Book of Woe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Greenberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13289334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An account of the making of the new DSM questions whether psychiatry is -- or should be -- a science]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Psychiatric diagnosis is built on fiction and sold to the public as fact." So writes psychotherapist Gary Greenberg in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0399158537/?tag=saloncom08-20">"The Book of Woe: The Making of the DSM and the Unmaking of Psychiatry."</a> That's an explosive assertion but also one that doesn't quite mean what most of you are probably thinking. Scientologists, settle down: Greenberg is not on your side. And talk-therapy pooh-poohers, spare us all those chortles of vindicated scorn; he doesn't agree with you, either.</p><p>"The Book of Woe" is an account of the compiling of the fifth edition of the "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders." The DSM was first published in 1952, and in the years since it has been subject to epochal revisions in which the foundations of the mental health professions have been reconceived and revamped. The DSM-5, plans for which were begun as early as 1999, is set to be published this month. The process of assembling it has been anything but smooth, as "The Book of Woe" relates.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/the_book_of_woe_psychiatrys_last_stand/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/the_book_of_woe_psychiatrys_last_stand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are millennials delusional?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[millennials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that members of "Generation Me" are warped by a profound sense of entitlement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a>Young people coming of age over the past decade or so have been referred to as Millennials, or, in a nod to their individualistic nature, <a href="http://eubie.com/genme.pdf" target="_blank">Generation Me</a>.</p><p><a href="http://psp.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/01/0146167213484586.abstract" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests they could also be called the generation with unrealistic expectations.</p><p>An analysis of the values and ambitions of American 12th graders finds “a growing discrepancy between the desire for material rewards and the willingness to do the work usually required to earn them.” Psychologists <a href="http://www.psychology.sdsu.edu/people/jean-twenge/" target="_blank">Jean Twenge</a> of San Diego State University and <a href="http://www.knox.edu/academics/faculty/kasser-tim.html" target="_blank">Tim Kasser</a> of Knox College report that, for high school seniors in 2005, 2006, and 2007, materialism remained at historically high levels, even as commitment to hard work declined.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/study_millennials_are_lazy_have_unrealistic_expectations_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>207</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We live in the Age of Trauma</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/we_live_in_the_age_of_trauma/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/we_live_in_the_age_of_trauma/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychiatry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychiatric treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287027</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every generation has a diagnosis that defines them. Ours is PTSD, and the treatment is far more complex than a pill]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in Boston two days before the bombings, with my family at an Indian restaurant not far from the soon-to-be crime scene at Copley Square, and we were surrounded by runners loading up on carbs. It was an unusually warm and pleasant night here in New England, where we’ve had one of the latest springs on record, and there was an air of excited and happy expectation about the place.</p><p>Then the bombs went off, and the trauma set in.</p><p>Each American generation has its characteristic psychiatric diagnosis, and, typically, a drug or medication that represents the times. When the world was on the verge of blowing up in the Dr. Strangelove 1960s, we lived in the Age of Anxiety. Valium, the drug that symbolized that period, was celebrated in books and movies like "Valley of the Dolls" and songs like the Rolling Stones’ "Mother’s Little Helper." The 1970s was the Age of Malaise, and the drug that attempted to mediate that malaise was cocaine. Starting in the Prozac-fueled late 1980s and 1990s, the omnipresent diagnosis was depression. Later, the diagnosis was attention deficit disorder and the representative drug was Adderall.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/we_live_in_the_age_of_trauma/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/we_live_in_the_age_of_trauma/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Drone strikes linked to &#8220;unprecedented&#8221; psychological trauma in Pakistan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/drone_strikes_linked_to_unprecedented_psychological_trauma_in_pakistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/drone_strikes_linked_to_unprecedented_psychological_trauma_in_pakistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waziristan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["They are always apprehensive about the drones, about their lives," said Pehshawar psychiatrist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A report from the <a href="http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2013-04/08/content_16381701.htm">AFP</a> this week finds that the psychological trauma suffered by Pakistanis living under the threat of U.S. drone strikes and Taliban fighting is "unprecedented." An <a href="http://www.livingunderdrones.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Stanford_NYU_LIVING_UNDER_DRONES.pdf">extensive, on the ground study carried out last year</a> by the International Human Rights and Conflict Resolution Clinic of Stanford Law School and the Global Justice Clinic at the New York University School of Law described the environment of "constant fear" under which Pakistanis in drone-struck regions, such as Waziristan, live. Monday's AFP report notes a "growing number of Pakistanis living in the tribal areas on the Afghan border who ha[ve] suffered from conditions related to depression, anxiety and other mental health problems because of war":</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/drone_strikes_linked_to_unprecedented_psychological_trauma_in_pakistan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/09/drone_strikes_linked_to_unprecedented_psychological_trauma_in_pakistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The myths of happiness</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/the_myths_of_happiness_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/the_myths_of_happiness_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L.A. Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13256430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three books on how to attain it and what it means]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WHEN MY CHILDREN WERE YOUNG, my wife and I focused our child-rearing efforts on nurturing intellectual enthusiasm, self-discipline, kindness, empathy, honesty, and ambition. I don’t think we spent 10 minutes worrying about whether our kids were going to be happy. Of course they were. How could they not? They had loving and attentive parents who got along well with each other and grandparents who doted on them, they went to good schools, and they lived in a warm and supportive community.</p><p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1_sm.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a>As my kids got older, approaching the age of the students I taught, a light bulb suddenly went on in my blinkered brain. Most of the kids I taught were just like my kids. They had parents who loved them, came from good communities and schools, had been nurtured and protected throughout their childhoods. Yet plenty of these kids didn’t seem to be happy. They were anxious, they were depressed, they were unenthusiastic about their work, and they were uncertain about their futures. I suddenly realized that happiness is not something to be taken for granted (I can hear you saying “duh!”). When I came to this blinding insight, my parenting aims turned on a dime. I also discovered that my wife had appreciated this all along, and that equipping our kids to be happy had always been part of her parenting agenda.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/the_myths_of_happiness_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/31/the_myths_of_happiness_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does studying science make you a better person?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[morality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study suggests that scientists are more likely to have a strong moral compass than those outside the field]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to be a better person? Spend more time thinking about science.<br /> <a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>That’s the implication of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0057989" target="_blank">newly published research</a>, which finds people who study science — or who are even momentarily exposed to the idea of scientific research — are more likely to condemn unethical behavior and more inclined to help others.</p><p>“Thinking about science leads individuals to endorse more stringent moral norms,” report psychologists <a href="http://christinemakellams.com/cv/" target="_blank">Christine Ma-Kellams</a> of Harvard University and <a href="http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/people/faculty/blascovich/" target="_blank">Jim Blascovich</a> of the University of California, Santa Barbara. Their research is published in the online journal PLOS One.</p><p>The researchers describe four experiments, all conducted at UCSB, that back up their surprising conclusion.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/does_studying_science_make_you_a_better_person_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saving psychology</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/saving_the_psychological_community_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/saving_the_psychological_community_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13213815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Reproducibility Project aims to bring back research replication, essential for good science, back to psychology]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p>There are few psychological effects better known—or more widely accepted—in academic halls than what is called semantic priming. Show a person a simple stimulus, something as unremarkable as a photograph of a cat. Let some time pass, then ask that same person to list as many words as possible that start with the letter c. This person is more likely not only to come up with the word cat, but to mention catlike animals such as cougars and cheetahs, because he was initially primed with that one little kitty cat.</p><p>Priming’s reach, of course, stretches far beyond cognitive tests. Therapists use it to help treat patients with depression during therapy sessions. Advertisers count on commercials to prime us to buy key brands during our trips to the mall or the grocery store. Priming is considered an underlying mechanism in stereotyping. And the word has become part of our cultural lexicon, too. We talk about how we are “primed” to feel, to want, to need, to talk. Priming is everywhere.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/saving_the_psychological_community_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/saving_the_psychological_community_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are gay men and straight women friends?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/why_are_so_many_gay_men_friends_with_straight_women_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/why_are_so_many_gay_men_friends_with_straight_women_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Will and Grace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13205707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study suggests the Will and Grace dynamic owes to swapping romantic advice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the title characters of "Will and Grace" to Kurt and Rachel on "Glee," television comedies have picked up on an <a href="http://fap.sagepub.com/content/20/2/205.full.pdf+html" target="_blank">apparently widespread phenomenon</a>: intense friendships between gay men and straight women. But in real life, what cements this often-close bond?<br /> <a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.epjournal.net/articles/friends-with-benefits-but-without-the-sex-straight-women-and-gay-men-exchange-trustworthy-mating-advice/" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> provides a plausible, albeit partial, answer: their unique ability to provide clear-headed counsel regarding romantic relationships.</p><p>“Our results suggest that straight women and gay men perceive mating advice provided by each other to be more trustworthy than similar advice offered by other individuals,” a team led by psychologist <a href="http://davidmglewis.com/research-assistants.html" target="_blank">Eric Russell,</a> a visiting researcher at the University of Texas at Austin, writes in the journal Evolutionary Psychology.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/why_are_so_many_gay_men_friends_with_straight_women_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/19/why_are_so_many_gay_men_friends_with_straight_women_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Inside Rehab&#8221;: How it could work better, and why it doesn&#8217;t</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/03/inside_rehab_how_it_could_work_better_and_why_it_doesnt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/03/inside_rehab_how_it_could_work_better_and_why_it_doesnt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoholism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoholics Anonymous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substance Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inside Rehab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Fletcher]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13189293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A startling new investigation of addiction programs says 28 days and 12 steps add up to inadequate treatment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe Amy Winehouse had a point: However flippant that sounds, many a reader will be thinking it (or something like it) after finishing Anne M. Fletcher's <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0670025224/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Inside Rehab."</a> Fletcher visited 15 addiction-treatment programs, from the high-end to the bare-bones, and interviewed staffers, researchers, experts and over a hundred clients and their families. She collected data from an impressively wide range of studies and surveys. Nearly 3 million Americans seek help for substance-use disorders in speciality facilities annually (not including the nearly 2.5 million who opt for self-help groups like Alcoholics Anonymous) and we spend $35 billion on treating these disorders, so it's surprising how little most of us know about what goes on in rehab.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/03/inside_rehab_how_it_could_work_better_and_why_it_doesnt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/03/inside_rehab_how_it_could_work_better_and_why_it_doesnt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do our genes make us more sensitive?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/do_our_genes_make_us_more_sensitive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/do_our_genes_make_us_more_sensitive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 22:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emotion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research shows that a series of genetic mutations may dictate how susceptible we are to our environments.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>In psychiatry, there has been a great mystery. We know that virtually every single mental disorder identified thus far has a heritable basis. So we know that many genes are involved. At the same time, whenever we go fishing for the specific genes that are associated with any disorder, we end up with an awful lot of seaweed. Each gene explains only a fraction of the outcome, and very few genes actually replicate. This doesn't mean genes don't contribute to the manifestation of psychological traits and disorders, but it does mean we'll have to look beyond the genetic level if we want a fuller understanding of how we become who we are.</div><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><div>In recent years, studies keep accumulating that show the importance of gene by environment interactions. But researchers aren't just finding that the environment matters in determining whether mental illness exists. What is being discovered is far more interesting and nuanced: Some of the very same genes that under certain environmental conditions are associated with some of the lowest lows of humanity, under supportive conditions are associated with the highest highs of human flourishing.</div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/do_our_genes_make_us_more_sensitive/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/do_our_genes_make_us_more_sensitive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s talk about dying</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/lets_talk_about_dying/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/lets_talk_about_dying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Assisted Suicide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Right to die]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nursing homes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At 88 and ailing, I refuse to live at any cost. I only hope that when the time comes, I'll have the courage to act]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“It’s better than the alternative, isn’t it?” Words spoken repeatedly when, during the course of a research project on aging, I asked people for their thoughts about the new longevity and their own aging. Sometimes it was said with a shrug of resignation, more often as an unquestioning statement – a certainty that living is better than dying. Each time I heard it, I wanted to ask, "Is it?" Often I gave in to the impulse, which almost always begot a confused and startled response: "You mean you think it's better to die?"</p><p>I’ve thought about that question many times in the years since then, and my answer today is an even more resonant, “Yes.” It isn't that I'm so eager to die, but I can't help thinking about how destructive our fear of death is -- how it compels us to live, even when "living" may be little more than breathing; how we have made living, just to be alive, the unqualified objective. For me, that’s quite simply not enough. No, that’s not right. It isn’t “simple” at all. But I do have a concrete plan to end my life when I decide it’s time – and the tools to implement it. <em>Will I have the courage to do it? </em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/lets_talk_about_dying/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/lets_talk_about_dying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Controversial changes to stay in DSM-5</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/controversial_changes_to_stay_in_dsm_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/controversial_changes_to_stay_in_dsm_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSM-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSM-IV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Psychology Association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mental disorders]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13112763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The board of the American Psychiatric Association has approved the final changes to the "psychiatry bible"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The board of the American Pyschiatric Association yesterday <a href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/DSM-5/36206">approved</a> revisions that will comprise the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, the diagnostic manual dubbed the "psychiatry bible." Health care professionals and policy makers <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/27/therapists_revolt_against_psychiatrys_bible/">have been watching closely</a>, as the influential guidebook has not been revised since its fourth edition came out in 1994 (a text revision was made in 2000). Though the APA has stayed pretty quiet about the finalized revisions, <a href="http://www.medpagetoday.com/Psychiatry/DSM-5/36206">MedPage's John Gever</a> reported that some of the most controversial proposals, specifically within the Autism community, will appear in the new DSM:</p><ul> <li> Children aged older than 6 who "show frequent bursts of anger along with chronic irritability" may be diagnosed with "Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder." This diagnosis seems problematic to Autism Speaks', Geraldine Dawson, who said they remained "concerned about the impact of the new DSM-5 criteria when they are used in real world settings."</li> <li>Autism-related conditions will be lumped under the "autism spectrum disorder," an attempt to reorganize the current DSM by bunching them into a single category.</li> </ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/controversial_changes_to_stay_in_dsm_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/02/controversial_changes_to_stay_in_dsm_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Unhappiness hurts fiscal health</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/study_unhappiness_hurts_fiscal_health/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/study_unhappiness_hurts_fiscal_health/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 22:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13100091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you sad because you're broke, or broke because you're sad? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it's treating yourself to an extravagant dinner after a stressful day or picking up a new pair of boots during a nasty breakup, people tend to spend more when they're feeling blue. Anecdotal evidence like this inspired researchers at Harvard University to look into the matter and what they found probably won't surprise you: feeling down can take a serious toll on your wallet.</p><p>As part of the study, a select group was shown a sad movie (this <a title="The Champ is the Saddest Movie Ever Made " href="http://blog.moviefone.com/2011/07/25/saddest-movie-ever-made-science-knows-answer/" target="_blank">one</a>, perhaps?) and were then asked to make financial decisions. Compared to subjects who had not watched the video, the sad group were far more likely to make choices that presented a short-term benefit, but were less profitable in the long run.</p><p>Blame it on "present bias," a phenomenon that makes us crave immediate gratification at the expense of even greater rewards later on. It's a tendency that many people exhibit in everyday life, but add a little melancholy into the mix and you've got yourself a recipe for financial disaster. Lead researcher Jennifer Lerner explains that "compared with neutral emotion, sadness -- and not just any negative emotion -- made people more myopic, and therefore willing to forgo greater future gains in return for instant gratification."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/study_unhappiness_hurts_fiscal_health/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/study_unhappiness_hurts_fiscal_health/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Hallucinations&#8221;: Seeing what isn&#8217;t there</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/hallucinations_seeing_what_isnt_there/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/hallucinations_seeing_what_isnt_there/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oliver Sacks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oliver Sacks explores the strange world of hallucinations, and says they're far more common than we realize]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oliver Sacks may be the father of the popular neurological best-seller, but he's distinctly different from the current crop of authors, be they as substantive as Daniel Kahneman (<a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0374275637/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Thinking Fast and Slow"</a>) or as dodgy as Jonah Lehrer. The latest iteration of the genre usually makes generalizations about human behavior on the basis of quantitative studies. The particular histories of the unnamed subjects of those studies are irrelevant; all that matters is the aggregate, because only in writing about the average person can today's neuroscience author claim that his book is about <em>you,</em> the average reader.</p><p>Sacks, on the other hand, has always been fascinated by outliers. It's his professed belief that the underlying structures and functions of the brain can be most captivatingly glimpsed in the experiences of the man who mistook his wife for a hat and the man who kicked his own leg out of bed. This approach, not incidentally, also makes for much better stories than, say, descriptions of studies in which college students were asked to memorize numbers under trying circumstances. There's an aura of self-help surrounding most popular neuroscience books today, with all the banality that term implies. What the Sacks style lacks in personal applicability it makes up for in marvels. So much so, in fact, that filmmaker Wes Anderson offered a parody version of Sacks in "The Royal Tenenbaums": a shrink, played by Bill Murray, whose career is built on exhibiting his clients' freakishness to the public.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/hallucinations_seeing_what_isnt_there/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/hallucinations_seeing_what_isnt_there/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to find a therapist?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/how_to_find_a_therapist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/how_to_find_a_therapist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychiatry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alcoholism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drug Addiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13059851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm in recovery and scary memories are coming up. How do I find a professional?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>I'm 46. I need help or advice on how to find a therapist. I have been in recovery since July 5, 2010. I have been working the AA program, with a sponsor, working the steps. My life is much better than it was when I was drinking -- so much better. If I try to stand outside of myself, I am awed at how it is better, in all ways, except ... I still don't have a desire to succeed in life. I don't really even have an active desire to be alive at all. I am not obsessed with thoughts of ending my life, but the thought is always there. It is not urgent, and it's not something I feel I want to act upon, but the thought is always there. I need assistance finding my way out of this thicket of thorns, and I am afraid and ashamed to ask for it.</strong></p><p><strong>My fingers hesitate to write more. My mother inflicted much physical pain on me from the time I was an infant. She slapped me in the face regularly, from the time I was an infant. People around knew of this and I don't know what they were expected to do but they did nothing. Well, an aunt walked out once, rather than witness it anymore. She speaks today of this action with pride. Way to go, aunt. Good for you. This abuse eventually became almost ritualistic in nature: I would have to kneel in front of my mother and she would raise her hand as high as she could and slap me as hard as she could. If I flinched, this fed her evil nature, and she'd repeat the action until I stopped flinching. I feel like I'm in a basement room full of dirt.</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/how_to_find_a_therapist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/how_to_find_a_therapist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will I mistreat my child?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/will_i_mistreat_my_child/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/will_i_mistreat_my_child/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trauma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emdr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parenting mistakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-traumatic stress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13051104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My family was full of abuse. Am I destined to repeat it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dear Cary,</strong></p><p><strong>This year my husband and I welcomed our first child. </strong></p><p><strong>I'm grateful to be mother to my little boy, more every day as I watch him develop into his own person. I'm writing because becoming a mother has dredged up some emotions, and I'm not sure how to act or feel. I am really confused.</strong></p><p><strong>As an adult I have developed a really close relationship with my parents. Things were a bit strained when I was a teenager, and I always assumed that was normal. However, during a recent visit, my mom brought up an ugly incident from my childhood, and the more I think about it, the more I realize that I have sanitized my childhood, because the distance I gained when I moved out allowed me to do so. The incident involved a heated argument in which my father, at the behest of my mother, punched my brother several times. This was not an isolated incident, but it was the worst of many violent arguments with my parents that we dismissed as "not abusive" because nobody's nose was broken and no teachers saw any bruises.</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/will_i_mistreat_my_child/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/will_i_mistreat_my_child/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Muscular men have self-interested politics, says study</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/muscular_men_have_self_interested_politics_says_study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/muscular_men_have_self_interested_politics_says_study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Economist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Views]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Redistribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-interest]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13048945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Researchers found an alignment between physical strength in men and their views on redistribution]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A study has found that physically strong men are more likely to hold self-interested political opinions than their less muscular male counterparts, <a href="http://www.economist.com/news/science-and-technology/21564825-man%E2%80%99s-muscle-power-influences-his-beliefs">the Economist reported</a>. Michael Petersen of the University of Aarhus in Denmark and Daniel Sznycer of the University of California, Santa Barbara, sought to investigate whether any correlations existed between physical characteristics and political views.</p><p>Their findings, published in Psychological Science and picked up by the Economist, indicate that in men only there appears to be an alignment of physical strength and expressed political self-interest. The Economist reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/muscular_men_have_self_interested_politics_says_study/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/muscular_men_have_self_interested_politics_says_study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can&#8217;t law enforcement admit their mistakes?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/why_cant_law_enforcement_admit_their_mistakes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/why_cant_law_enforcement_admit_their_mistakes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wrongful Conviction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Justice System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human behavior]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13046509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Their refusal to do so leads to countless wrongful convictions, but psychology says few will cop to misconduct]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> After honor student Stephanie Crowe was stabbed to death in her bedroom in Escondido, California in January 1998, police briefly questioned (and collected clothes from) Richard Tuite, a drug-addicted, mentally ill transient who had been spotted prowling nearby the previous evening and scaring the Crowes’ neighbors. But the first person to get the third degree by detectives was Stephanie’s 14-year-old brother Michael, who weathered 10 hours of grueling interrogation without his parents or attorney present.</p><p>Michael was told – falsely – that his 12-year-old sister’s blood was found in his room, that his hair was discovered between her fingers and that his voice stress analyzer test showed deception. Eventually, Michael cracked. He told detectives he had no memory of the crime, but he would be willing to make something up for them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/why_cant_law_enforcement_admit_their_mistakes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/why_cant_law_enforcement_admit_their_mistakes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why are Americans so easy to manipulate?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/why_are_americans_so_easy_to_manipulate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/why_are_americans_so_easy_to_manipulate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumerism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pavlov]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Behaviorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13038820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We may be loathe to admit it, but behaviorism and consumerism are cut from the same cloth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> What a fascinating thing! Total control of a living organism!  — psychologist B.F. Skinner</p><p>The corporatization of society requires a population that accepts control by authorities, and so when psychologists and psychiatrists began providing techniques that could control people, the corporatocracy embraced mental health professionals.</p><p>In psychologist B.F. Skinner’s best-selling book <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beyond_Freedom_and_Dignity" target="_blank">Beyond Freedom and Dignity </a> (1971), he argued that freedom and dignity are illusions that hinder the science of behavior modification, which he claimed could create a better-organized and happier society.</p><p>During the height of Skinner’s fame in the 1970s, it was obvious to anti-authoritarians such as Noam Chomsky (“<a href="http://www.chomsky.info/articles/19711230.htm" target="_blank">The Case Against B.F. Skinner”</a>) and Lewis Mumord that Skinner’s worldview—a society ruled by benevolent control freaks—was antithetical to democracy. In Skinner’s novel Walden Two (1948), his behaviorist hero states, “We do not take history seriously”; to which Lewis Mumford retorted, “And no wonder: if man knew no history, the Skinners would govern the world, as Skinner himself has modestly proposed in his behaviorist utopia.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/why_are_americans_so_easy_to_manipulate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/why_are_americans_so_easy_to_manipulate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird news: Baldness is strength</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/weird_news_baldness_is_strength/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/weird_news_baldness_is_strength/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 20:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Carville]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lloyd Blankfein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slide Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baldness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samuel l jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13030334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research says totally shorn scalps project power but wisps are a weakness]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new study from the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School found that men with shaved heads appear more dominant than similar men with full heads of hair. Based on research looking at dominance and non-verbal behavior, the study found that men with no hair at all are perceived as more masculine, dominant and even taller. However, bald men who do not shave remaining wisps of hair are perceived as the least powerful of all.</p><p>Check out our slideshow of individuals who seem to support and challenge this study.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>[slide_show id=13030380]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/weird_news_baldness_is_strength/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/weird_news_baldness_is_strength/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
