<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Publishing News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/publishing_news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pulitzers snub fiction</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/pulitzers_snub_fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/pulitzers_snub_fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12875761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No novel won the coveted prize this year, but does that mean nothing good was published?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news that no Pulitzer Prize for fiction would be awarded this year came like a slap across the face to a book world still reeling from a Department of Justice suit filed against publishers trying to forestall an Amazon e-book monopoly. Double ouch! But does the Pulitzer snub mean that no good fiction was published in America last year?</p><p>I would <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/07/the_best_fiction_of_2011/">(and have)</a> argued otherwise, most strenuously; 2011 was an exceptional year for fiction, American and otherwise. I also suspect that the Pulitzer Board itself has not turned up its collective nose at every book produced by American novelists and short story writers in 2011. The Pulitzer Prize may wield far more clout with book buyers than any other American prize for fiction. It can turn an obscure title into a success and a modestly successful title into a bestseller. Readers take it seriously and snap up the books it honors by the thousands. But that doesn't mean that the Pulitzer Prize for fiction doesn't suffer from the same problems that afflict every literary prize, no matter its size or influence.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/pulitzers_snub_fiction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/pulitzers_snub_fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When the Internet ate my son&#8217;s manga magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/15/when_the_internet_ate_my_sons_manga_magazine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/15/when_the_internet_ate_my_sons_manga_magazine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12165831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even the digital generation can sing the disappearing print publication blues]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The card in the mail delivered sad news, disguised as progress. <a href="http://shonenjump.viz.com/">Shonen Jump magazine,</a> a monthly digest of translated-into-English Japanese <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manga">manga,</a>, was ceasing print publication. Instead, subscribers were invited to sign up for <a href="http://shonenjump.viz.com/wsja-details">Shonen Jump Alpha</a> an online-only feed of new manga (the Japanese term for comic books). Shonen Jump Alpha<em>,</em> declared the card, would be a great bargain! There would be more manga content available than ever before, and new chapters in ongoing serials would be posted on a sprightly weekly basis.</p><p>My heart sank, however, because I knew someone who was going to be very disappointed. My son. Four years earlier, I'd given Eli a subscription to Shonen Jump as a birthday present. It was a gift that kept on giving. My son has unimpeachable bona fides as a member of the digital generation, swimming in a sea of texts and video games and YouTube channels as effortlessly and naturally as a dolphin in the South Pacific, but I'm not sure I ever saw him more happy or content or intently transfixed as he was on those days when a new Shonen Jump arrived. He would curl up on our living room couch with the gloriously fat magazine -- sometimes several hundred pages in length -- and devour the latest adventures of Naruto and One Piece and Bleach.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/15/when_the_internet_ate_my_sons_manga_magazine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/15/when_the_internet_ate_my_sons_manga_magazine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your favorite author, brought to you by a wealthy patron</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/05/your_favorite_author_brought_to_you_by_a_wealthy_patron/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/05/your_favorite_author_brought_to_you_by_a_wealthy_patron/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art in Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10103512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As copyright erodes and the book industry changes, a combination of Kickstarter and the rich might fund writers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A passage from <a href="http://entertainment.salon.com/2011/09/11/swerve/singleton/">Stephen Greenblatt's</a> new book, <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D9780393064476%26">"Swerve,"</a> on Renaissance book culture, has this to say about how writers paid their bills several centuries ago:</p><blockquote><p>Authors made nothing from the sale of their books; their profits derived from the wealthy patron to whom the work was dedicated. (The arrangement -- which helps to account for the fulsome flattery of dedicatory epistles -- seems odd to us, but it had an impressive stability, remaining in place until the invention of copyright in the 18th century.)</p></blockquote><p>We're so accustomed to thinking of copyright as the foundation of a writer's livelihood that it's difficult to imagine how authors could survive without it. Yet we may need to start doing just that.</p><p>Our current copyright laws and (often ham-fisted) attempts to enforce them have many critics, but you don't see a lot of people advocating their complete eradication. They don't really need to. The biggest threat to copyright comes from the advent of digital reproduction, which has made piracy much, much easier. Reform could well be beside the point; copyright seems poised to die the death of a million cut-and-pastes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/05/your_favorite_author_brought_to_you_by_a_wealthy_patron/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/05/your_favorite_author_brought_to_you_by_a_wealthy_patron/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Montana investigates &#8220;Three Cups of Tea&#8221; charity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/us_books_three_cups_of_tea/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/us_books_three_cups_of_tea/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/04/20/us_books_three_cups_of_tea</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Montana attorney general opens inquiry into possible malfeasance at Greg Mortenson's Central Asia Institute]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Montana's attorney general is scrutinizing the charity run by "Three Cups of Tea" co-author Greg Mortenson after reports questioned whether Mortenson benefited from money donated to build schools in Pakistan and Afghanistan.</p><p>Attorney General Steve Bullock's announcement Tuesday follows investigations by "60 Minutes" and author Jon Krakauer into inaccuracies in the book and spending by the Bozeman, Mont.-based Central Asia Institute.</p><p>Bullock oversees nonprofit corporations operating in the state. He has been in contact with attorneys for the agency, and they have pledged their full cooperation, he said in a statement to The Associated Press.</p><p>"While looking into this issue, my office will not jump to any conclusions -- but we have a responsibility to make sure charitable assets are used for their intended purposes," he said in the statement.</p><p>"Three Cups of Tea" was released in 2006 and sold more than 3 million copies. That notoriety helped Mortenson grow the Central Asia Institute by generating more than $50 million in donations, Krakauer said.</p><p>According to the charity's website, it has "successfully established over 170 schools" and helped educate over 68,000 students, with an emphasis on girls' education.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/us_books_three_cups_of_tea/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/20/us_books_three_cups_of_tea/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why &#8220;Three Cups of Tea&#8217;s&#8221; lies don&#8217;t really matter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/greg_mortenson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/greg_mortenson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2011 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoirs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonfiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/04/19/greg_mortenson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Mortenson is being attacked for his book's inaccuracies. His accusers are missing the point]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lying and cheating -- there may not seem to be much of a difference when you're the victim of either (or both), but as the ongoing furor over Greg Mortenson's "Three Cups of Tea" indicates, there are some crucial distinctions.</p><p>Mortenson is a former trauma nurse who began working to educate children in impoverished tribal areas of Afghanistan and Pakistan in the mid-1990s. "Three Cups of Tea," his first book, was written with David Oliver Relin and first published in 2006, becoming a longtime nonfiction bestseller when the paperback was released in 2007. The book is closely linked with the Central Asia Institute (CAI), a charity started by Mortenson to build schools in the area. Mortenson, a popular and charismatic speaker, pursues an intensive schedule of media and public appearances, selling books by the crateful and collecting donations for CAI.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/greg_mortenson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/19/greg_mortenson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>157</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Author, sell thyself</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/writer_sell_thyself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/writer_sell_thyself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/03/29/writer_sell_thyself</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What we stand to lose in a world where writing a great book isn't good enough]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the book world saw a particularly symmetrical bit of revolving door ballet as Amanda Hocking -- who famously became a millionaire by selling a series of paranormal romance novels as self-published e-books -- signed a contract with an old-fashioned publishing house, while the bestselling thriller author Barry Eisler walked away from a similar deal, preferring to self-publish his next book. Did I mention it was the same publisher (St. Martin's Press) in both cases? Like I said: symmetrical.</p><p>Eisler told Jason Pinter at the Daily Beast that he'd been exasperated by the way his previous publishers had marketed his books -- everything from boring covers to a failure to understand something called "automatic resonance." Eisler has also done the math (which he lays out in considerable detail for Pinter) and believes that, as handsome as the two-book deal St. Martin's offered him was, in the long term he can make more money on his own.</p><p>Other successful conventionally published genre writers -- the most celebrated of whom is J.A. Konrath -- have mined their out-of-print backlist for self-published e-book sales and done well. This week, the estate of Dame Catherine Cookson, a bestselling author in days of yore, announced that it will be selling 91 titles from her backlist exclusively for Kindle, largely because conventional publishers haven't shown much interest in reprinting them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/writer_sell_thyself/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/30/writer_sell_thyself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The e-book that launched a thousand flame wars</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/jacqueline_howett_greek_seaman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/jacqueline_howett_greek_seaman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2011 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amazon.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/2011/03/29/jacqueline_howett_greek_seaman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A self-published author takes on a critic -- and becomes a cautionary tale]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, hundreds of thousands of books are put out by independent presses that let you pay to publish your own story. And with the popularity of the iPad and Kindle, these would-be authors can bypass the cost of printing entirely, making your writing-to-publishing process a one-step deal. That may have been one step too few for British author Jacqueline Howett, whose book went out into the world before it was copyedited -- and full of typos.</p><p>"<a href="http://pdf-ebooks.net/sample/41423/the-secret-passion-of-twins">The Greek Seaman</a>" is the third of Howett's self-published, straight-to-Kindle affairs, and it probably would not have drawn much attention had it not been for a blog called Big Al's Books and Pals. On March 16, <a href="http://booksandpals.blogspot.com/2011/03/greek-seaman-jacqueline-howett.html">Big Al reviewed "Seaman"</a> and gave it the most positive review the writer could muster:</p><blockquote>
<p>"If you read 'The Greek Seaman' from the start until you click next page for the last time I think you&#8217;ll find the story compelling and interesting. The culture shock felt by the newlywed bride, Katy, who finds herself far from her native England, living on a cargo ship with her seaman husband Don is a good story in itself ...</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/jacqueline_howett_greek_seaman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/29/jacqueline_howett_greek_seaman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Frey does Jesus</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/james_frey_s_jesus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/james_frey_s_jesus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Frey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/03/16/james_frey_s_jesus</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the faux-memoirist thinks he'll offend anyone by depicting Christ as a whoring drunk, he'll be disappointed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently James Frey has a tiny man in his head, like some kind of internalized boss, who barks, "You haven't enraged anyone lately!" and starts cracking the whip whenever things slow down. This week, we learned that Frey will deliver a book he discussed in an interview with the Rumpus back in 2008, "The Final Testament of the Holy Bible," which will depict the return of Jesus Christ as a drunk who consorts with hookers and canoodles with other men. The book will be published in a limited edition by an art gallery and self-published by Frey "online," which presumably means in e-book format. This event will take place on April 22, Good Friday.</p><p>I know! Shocking, right? Frey says that he expects to "get blasted" for this. The press has happily joined him in rubbing its hands together over the prospect, deploying words like "controversial" and "firestorm" in stories that Frey promptly posts to his website. "I tried to write a radical book. I'm releasing it in a radical way," Frey told the New York Post. So it's possible his Christ might be a skateboarder, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/james_frey_s_jesus/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/16/james_frey_s_jesus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Google leading an e-book revolution?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/google_ebookstore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/google_ebookstore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2010 01:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2010/12/07/google_ebookstore</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The search giant takes aim at Amazon in the battle for the booming market in digital books]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the time Google eBookstore finally launched on Monday, it was already being touted as a revolution in the marketplace for digital books. It offers more titles -- nearly 3 million free, public domain books and "hundreds of thousands" of newer books available for purchase -- than any other retailer, and promises every customer "seamless" cloud-based access to their personal e-book library from (almost) any device, no matter where they are.</p><p>Whether these features will mean much to the average e-book reader, however, is another matter. Sales of e-books have grown by triple-digit rates in the past year, and industry experts predict no immediate end to the expansion, given that e-reader devices and tablet computers are expected to be popular gifts this holiday season. For every person I've met who swears she will never be lured away from her beloved print books, there's another who raves about finally reading "Middlemarch" on his smart phone during his daily wait for the bus and someone else who reports devouring twice as many books as she did before she got a Kindle.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/google_ebookstore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/08/google_ebookstore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin&#8217;s new book leaks to liberal blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/sarah_palin_new_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/sarah_palin_new_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/19/sarah_palin_new_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reality show star is outraged that everyone in the press is contributing to her publisher's marketing campaign]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin's second book is due out next week. It is called "America by Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith, and Flag," although if the leaked excerpts are any indication a lot of it seems to be "reflections on stuff Sarah Palin saw on TV."</p><p>Like "American Idol," which is a symbol of decadent liberal elitism. And, for some reason, <a href="http://gawker.com/5692353/sarah-palins-new-book-leaked-excerpts">"Murphy Brown,"</a> because <em>inviting</em> Dan Quayle comparisons is a really good idea. And <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20023381-503544.html">the films "Knocked Up," "Juno," and "The 40 Year Old Virgin,"</a> which Palin likes because they are pro-marriage and pro-babies, even though godless Hollywood liberal elites made them.</p><p>The book is also about how Levi Johnston is <em>still</em> a craven, awful monster. And babies Tripp and Trig are still little accidental angels that everyone is very happy were not aborted. And the Tea Parties are good and <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20023381-503544.html">Michelle Obama is an awful, embittered reverse-racist.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/sarah_palin_new_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/19/sarah_palin_new_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-wing publisher rehabilitates Lindbergh</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/regnery_charles_lindbergh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/regnery_charles_lindbergh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War II]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/10/21/regnery_charles_lindbergh</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new book argues that Charles Lindbergh was not an anti-Semite,  but rather a victim of smears by FDR and the left]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The influential conservative publishing house Regnery has just released a book that argues, contrary to popular belief, that aviator and political leader Charles Lindbergh was neither anti-semitic nor pro-German, but rather was the victim of an unfounded smear campaign by President Franklin D. Roosevelt.</p><p>According to promotional material, the book, "Lindbergh vs. Roosevelt: The Rivalry That Divided America" by <a href="http://www.greenwood.com/catalog/author/D/James_P._Duffy.aspx">James Duffy</a>, argues that Lindbergh was the target of a "vicious personal vendetta by President Roosevelt" that "blighted his reputation forever." FDR's campaign, the book argues, also amounted to a "modern-day playbook for the Left and their attack on those who speak out against them."</p><p>We can't fully judge the book until we've read it. But the book jacket <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Lindbergh-vs-Roosevelt-Rivalry-Divided/dp/1596986018">explicitly says</a>:</p><blockquote>
<p>This groundbreaking book reveals: ... Why the popular belief that Lindbergh was an anti&#8211;Semite is absolutely wrong</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/regnery_charles_lindbergh/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/regnery_charles_lindbergh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Meacham joining Random House</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/20/us_books_meacham/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/20/us_books_meacham/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/feature/2010/10/20/us_books_meacham</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Newsweek editor leaves the magazine world to publish nonfiction books]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pulitzer Prize winning biographer and former Newsweek editor Jon Meacham will soon be working for the Random House Publishing Group.</p><p>Random House announced Wednesday that, effective Jan. 3, Meacham will "acquire and edit a select number of nonfiction titles each year."</p><p>Meacham's biography of Andrew Jackson, "American Lion," was released by Random House in 2008 and won a Pulitzer.</p><p>The 41-year-old Meacham was editor of Newsweek from 2006 until last summer. His other books include "Franklin and Winston" and "American Gospel."</p><p>Random House recently hired another popular author-editor, Ruch Reichl, formerly of Gourmet magazine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/20/us_books_meacham/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/20/us_books_meacham/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuits that kill books</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/06/libel_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/06/libel_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2010/10/06/libel</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Litigious billionaires and foreign courts are as much a threat as book-banning fundamentalists]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week was Banned Books Week, a worthy institution calling attention to efforts to remove books from public libraries and school curricula. This annual event has become so successful that, although the American Library Association reported "460 recorded attempts to remove materials from libraries in 2009," a close examination suggests that many of these amounted to mere "challenges" -- written objections submitted to librarians or teachers by isolated crackpots or control freak parents with minimal chances of seeing their censorious desires fulfilled.</p><p>But book banning isn't the only form censorship takes, and schools and libraries aren't the only places where it happens. As reported in Publishers Weekly, the Texas Appeals Court last week heard an important but little-known case filed against Carla Main, author of "Bulldozed: 'Kelo,' Eminent Domain and the American Lust for Land," and her publisher, the conservative press Encounter Books. The plaintiff, developer H. Walker Royall, claims that Main has defamed him and wants her book yanked off the market and any future printings curtailed. Royall has also attempted to sue a newspaper that reviewed the book and even a law professor who provided a back-cover endorsement. (The latter case has already been dismissed.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/06/libel_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/06/libel_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Largest New Jersey newspaper offers buyouts to cut losses</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/07/star_ledger_buyouts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/07/star_ledger_buyouts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2006 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/09/07/star_ledger_buyouts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expected to lose $10 million this year, Star-Ledger dangles a year's salary, medical benefits for some managers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey's largest newspaper is offering more buyouts to employees as it faces mounting financial pressure.</p><p>In a memo to employees, the publisher of The Star-Ledger of Newark says the newspaper is expected to lose about $10 million this year. The newspaper lost about $9 million last year.</p><p>Publisher Richard Vezza writes that full-time employees will be offered a buyout that will pay them one year's salary plus medical benefits. Employees will have 45 days to make a decision.</p><p>Employees hired before Jan. 1, 2006 will be eligible. In the memo, Vezza says he hasn't set a target number for the buyouts.</p><p>Vezza also wrote in the memo that salaries would be adjusted and some job duties could be combined.</p><p>In 2008, more than 300 employees took buyouts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/07/star_ledger_buyouts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/07/star_ledger_buyouts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beware of blurbs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/09/blurbs_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/09/blurbs_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2010/07/09/blurbs</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From back-scratching to overpraise, why author endorsements are so bad -- and so unreliable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at the Guardian site, they're holding a contest for who can write the most ludicrous blurb for a Dan Brown novel, with predictably hilarious results. The inspiration for this antic is a pre-publication blurb written by Nicole Krauss, author of "The History of Love," for the new novel by David Grossman, "To the End of the Land." The literary blog Conversational Reading lodged the initial objection to Krauss' blurb, which was prominently printed on the front cover of the advance reader's copy:</p><blockquote>
<p>Very rarely, a few times in a lifetime, you open a book and when you close it again nothing can ever be the same. Walls have been pulled down, barriers broken, a dimension of feeling, of existence itself, has opened in you that was not there before. "To the End of the Land" is a book of this magnitude. David Grossman may be the most gifted writer I've ever read; gifted not just because of his imagination, his energy, his originality, but because he has access to the unutterable, because he can look inside a person and discover the unique essence of her humanity. For twenty-six years he has been writing novels about what it means to defend this essence, this unique light, against a world designed to extinguish it. "To the End of the Land" is his most powerful, shattering, and unflinching story of this defense. To read it is to have yourself taken apart, undone, touched at the place of your own essence; it is to be turned back, as if after a long absence, into a human being.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/09/blurbs_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/09/blurbs_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When anyone can be a published author</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/slush_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/slush_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 00:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2010/06/22/slush</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How do you find something good to read in a brave new self-published world?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When their former dictator, Augusto Pinochet, died four years ago, thousands of Chileans poured into the streets to celebrate -- but that's small potatoes compared to the crowds lining up to dance on the grave of traditional book publishing. The industry, we're forever being told, is antiquated and hidebound; it doesn't know how to spot great books or how to deliver them to readers. Fortunately, a tsunami of sparkling new technology is just about to hit those old fogies, washing them from the face of the earth so that the people who know what they're doing can finally take over.</p><p>If you have any contact with the publishing world, you probably hear some version of the story above every day. What's most striking, however, about the many, many conversations I've had about e-books, innovations in self-publishing and the emergence of publicity venues like social networking is how difficult it is to stay focused on what all of this means for readers. No matter how hard you try, within five minutes the talk turns inexorably back to how agents, editors and publishers will suffer in the coming cataclysmic change -- and, above all, how gloriously liberating it will be for authors.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/slush_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/23/slush_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Aviation&#8221; publishing shenanigans</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/ask_the_pilot_book_project/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/ask_the_pilot_book_project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ask the Pilot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/ask_the_pilot//2010/06/04/ask_the_pilot_book_project</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot has changed in air travel since 2004, right? That's why we need an updated "Ask the Pilot" book!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I keep being asked about the status of my book, the second edition of which I began working on over the winter. The status is that the project was canceled. There will be no second edition.</p><p>If you're the type who savors a little schadenfreude now and then, or if you have designs on writing a book of your own, I invite you to <a href="http://www.askthepilot.com/ask-the-pilot-a-cautionary/">click here</a> to read the full and gory details of my first, and presumably last experience in publishing.</p><p>The short version goes like this:</p><p>The original "Ask the Pilot: Everything You Need to Know About Air Travel" was published in 2004. In spite of horrible, sales-crushing in-store placement (I challenge you to find the "aviation" section in any Barnes &amp; Noble franchise) and a depressing lack of presence at airports, the book was moderately successful. Reviews were unanimously positive, and Amazon gave it "Best Travel Book of 2004" honors. It remains in print.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/ask_the_pilot_book_project/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/04/ask_the_pilot_book_project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama signs Daniel Pearl Freedom of Press Act</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/17/us_obama_press_freedom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/17/us_obama_press_freedom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 17:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/05/17/us_obama_press_freedom</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The law will expand efforts to protect the media around the world]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Barack Obama has signed a law intended to provide more protections for a free press around the world.</p><p>The law, the Daniel Pearl Freedom of Press Act, expands efforts to identify countries where press freedom is being violated. The law is named after Pearl, a Wall Street Journal reporter who was beheaded by militants in Pakistan in 2002.</p><p>The law expands an annual report on human rights practices to include information about media treatment, and identify countries where the media is being repressed.</p><p>Obama said the law would be a signal to governments around the world that their actions, including treatment of the media, are being watched.</p><p>He was joined for the signing ceremony in the Oval Office by Pearl's widow, Mariane, and Pearl's parents and son.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/17/us_obama_press_freedom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/17/us_obama_press_freedom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin, Peggy Noonan, flag: Naming an American book</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/12/sarah_palin_america_book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/12/sarah_palin_america_book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/12/sarah_palin_america_book</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These two stalwart conservatives know the magic formula for a truly patriotic title]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin has a new book on the way. The title: "America by Heart: Reflections on Family, Faith and Flag."</p><p><a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/10/05/sarah-palin-hearts-peggy-noonan/56607/">Josh Green at the Atlantic points out</a> that this sounds a lot like a book by Peggy Noonan, called "A Heart, a Cross, and a Flag: America Today."</p><p>But I don't think it's a true rip-off. Peggy, after all, is the East Coast elitist <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2008/09/03/noonan_murphy/index.html">who originally called "bullshit" on the Palin phenomenon.</a> Sarah wouldn't steal from <em>her.</em></p><p>No, it's just that both of them work from the "word salad" approach to political punditry. Noonan picks the fancy words and Palin picks the simple words. But when you are crafting a title for your glorious ode to this wonderful country, there are really only a few words to choose from!</p><p>Go ahead, try to come up with your own Peggy Noonan/Sarah Palin book of platitudes. It's harder than it looks! Here's the best I could do:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/12/sarah_palin_america_book/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/12/sarah_palin_america_book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why men don&#8217;t read books</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/05/men_don_t_read/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/05/men_don_t_read/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2010/05/04/men_don_t_read</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women editors are not the problem]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much as I enjoyed Roman Polanski's suave political thriller <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/02/18/ghost_writer">"The Ghost Writer,"</a> one early scene struck me as egregiously off. The main character, a scribe-for-hire played by Ewan McGregor, takes a meeting to discuss writing the memoirs of a politician. The other attendees are the head of the book publishing company, one of the editors, the writer's agent and a representative of the politician. Five people in a room discussing a book deal, and all of them men.</p><p>This is not, to say the least, very realistic, as Jason Pinter would no doubt concur. Writing last week in the Huffington Post, Pinter, an author whose r&#233;sum&#233; includes jobs in publishing at "several major houses," <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jason-pinter/why-men-dont-read-how-pub_b_549491.html">recounted his difficulties</a> in persuading his female colleagues to publish a book by Chris Jericho, a professional wrestler. "Pitching Jericho's book to my editorial board was like pitching iPads to the Amish," he complains, despite the fact that Jericho had an enviable "platform" -- the publishing-world term for regular TV and radio gigs. His co-workers had simply never heard of the guy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/05/men_don_t_read/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/05/men_don_t_read/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>180</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

