<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Quentin Tarantino</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/quentin_tarantino/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Django Unchained&#8221; reportedly gets another release date in China</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/django_unchained_reportedly_gets_another_release_date_in_china/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/django_unchained_reportedly_gets_another_release_date_in_china/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tarantino has edited the film, again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quentin Tarantino's slave western "Django Unchained" was poised to be the director's first commercial release in China, a country notorious for its strict censorship regulations. Though the film had been edited and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/china_cancels_django_unchained_showings_on_day_of_premiere/">scheduled for release on April 11</a>, Chinese officials abruptly pulled the movie without citing why.</p><p>After another round of edits, the film may have another shot in China, however.  From <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2013/apr/26/django-unchained-china-second-release">the Guardian</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/django_unchained_reportedly_gets_another_release_date_in_china/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/django_unchained_reportedly_gets_another_release_date_in_china/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China cancels &#8220;Django Unchained&#8221; premiere</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/china_cancels_django_unchained_showings_on_day_of_premiere/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/china_cancels_django_unchained_showings_on_day_of_premiere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The film would have been Tarantino's first commercial release in the country]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quentin Tarantino's "Django Unchained" was set to premiere in China on Thursday, marking the director's first film with a commercial release in China--except that Chinese censors have pulled the movie from theaters.</p><p>Deadline <a href="http://www.deadline.com/2013/04/china-pulls-django-unchained-from-theaters/">first reported</a> the news, which caught Sony Pictures off-guard:</p><blockquote><p>The studio which is releasing the blockbuster film internationally was caught by surprise, prompting studio spokesman Steve Elzer to tell me tonight: “We regret that Django Unchained has been removed from theaters and are working with the Chinese authorities to determine whether the film can be rescheduled.” In some cinemas, screenings were stopped after one minute of footage was shown “because of technical reasons … for the time being,” according to a notice distributed to cinema companies. It quoted unnamed industry insiders as saying that nudity prompted the sudden cancellations despite its official pre-release review.</p></blockquote><p>Despite the nudity, the cancellation has puzzled executives since it comes after the movie had been edited to comply with notoriously stringent Chinese censorship regulations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/china_cancels_django_unchained_showings_on_day_of_premiere/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/china_cancels_django_unchained_showings_on_day_of_premiere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscars: They were dreary, desperate and insincere. But it had its moments!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/oscars_dreary_desperate_and_insincere_with_some_good_points/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/oscars_dreary_desperate_and_insincere_with_some_good_points/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 09:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[85th annual oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daniel Day-Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Lawrence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel Day-Lewis makes history, Ben Affleck's a class act. But who was the pretend Matthew Broderick guy hosting?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t know that Daniel Day-Lewis’ deadpan gag about switching roles with Meryl Streep – “I was all set to play Maggie Thatcher, and she was Steven’s first choice for ‘Lincoln’” – was actually the funniest joke in the world, but it pretty much brought down the house just before midnight on Sunday. It was one of the few occasions during the Oscars when someone who seemed to have an adult sensibility and an education was speaking on that stage, and I for one felt almost pathetically grateful. Most of the rest of the overextended, hit-and-miss spectacle formerly known as the Academy Awards went back and forth between dreary and desperate to please, which is a pretty good description of host Seth MacFarlane as well.</p><p>Of course it’s standard operating procedure for someone in my position (or yours, for that matter!) to mock the Oscars for all kinds of reasons: The terrible musical numbers, the doomed attempts to seem hip and relevant, the amazing empty stretches in the middle of the evening occupied only by technical awards no one outside the film industry understands and commercials for “financial products.” In a year when the most famous awards ceremony in the history of show business changes its name in a last-minute branding panic, that’s all way too easy. It wasn't clear that the Oscars had any further to fall after the legendary James Franco-Anne Hathaway debacle of two years ago and the emergency Billy Crystal early-'90s flashback of last year -- and indeed I suspect this year <em>wasn't</em> worse -- just cruder, stranger and more detached from the Oscars' alleged and theoretical purpose.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/oscars_dreary_desperate_and_insincere_with_some_good_points/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/oscars_dreary_desperate_and_insincere_with_some_good_points/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 2013 Oscars: All the winners</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/the_2013_oscar_awards_who_won/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/the_2013_oscar_awards_who_won/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Hathaway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Linings Playbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beasts of the Southern Wild]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Haneke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13210273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Best picture: "Argo." Here's the complete list]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BEST PICTURE</strong><br /> "Amour"<br /> <strong>WINNER: "Argo"</strong><br /> "Beasts of the Southern Wild"<br /> "Django Unchained"<br /> "Les Misérables"<br /> "Life of Pi"<br /> "Lincoln"<br /> "Silver Linings Playbook"<br /> "Zero Dark Thirty"</p><p><strong>ACTOR IN A LEADING ROLE</strong><br /> Bradley Cooper, "Silver Linings Playbook"<br /> <strong>WINNER: Daniel Day-Lewis, "Lincoln"</strong><br /> Hugh Jackman, "Les Misérables"<br /> Joaquin Phoenix, "The Master"<br /> Denzel Washington, "Flight"</p><p><strong>ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE</strong><br /> Alan Arkin, "Argo"<br /> Robert De Niro, Silver Linings Playbook"<br /> Philip Seymour Hoffman, "The Master"<br /> Tommy Lee Jones, "Lincoln"<br /> <strong>WINNER: Christoph Waltz, "Django Unchained"</strong></p><p><strong>ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE</strong><br /> Jessica Chastain, "Zero Dark Thirty"<br /> <strong>WINNER: Jennifer Lawrence, "Silver Linings Playbook"</strong><br /> Emmanuelle Riva, "Amour"<br /> Quvenzhané Wallis, "Beasts of the Southern Wild"<br /> Naomi Watts, "The Impossible"</p><p><strong>ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE</strong><br /> Amy Adams, "The Master"<br /> Sally Field, "Lincoln"<br /> <strong>WINNER: Anne Hathaway, "Les Misérables"</strong><br /> Helen Hunt, "The Sessions"<br /> Jacki Weaver, "Silver Linings Playbook"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/the_2013_oscar_awards_who_won/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/24/the_2013_oscar_awards_who_won/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar loves a white savior</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/oscar_loves_a_white_savior/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/oscar_loves_a_white_savior/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oscars 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephen spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207135</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If a movie features white people rescuing people of color from their plight, odds are high an Oscar will follow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.easyodds.com/sports-betting/tv-and-awards-betting/awards/oscars/outright/best-picture.html">oddsmakers</a>, Steven Spielberg's "Lincoln" does not have the best chance of winning the 2013 Academy Award for best picture. That top spot right now goes to Ben Affleck's "Argo" — but it shouldn't. If history is any gauge, "Lincoln" has to be the front-runner thanks to its status as this year's only Oscar-nominated White Savior film.</p><p>If you've been to the movies in the last half-century, you know the White Savior genre well. It's the catalog of films that features white people single-handedly rescuing people of color from their plight. These story lines insinuate that people of color have no ability to rescue themselves. This both makes white audiences feel good about themselves by portraying them as benevolent messiahs (rather than hegemonic conquerors), and also depicts people of color as helpless weaklings -- all while wrapping such tripe in the cinematic argot of liberation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/oscar_loves_a_white_savior/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/oscar_loves_a_white_savior/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>164</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it ever OK for white people to say the N-word?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/is_it_ever_okay_for_white_people_to_say_the_n_word/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/is_it_ever_okay_for_white_people_to_say_the_n_word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[n-word]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lisa lampanelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david chapelle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis CK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Pryor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207520</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comic Lisa Lampanelli is not the first white comic to drop the N-word. But her "context" defense doesn't excuse her]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To begin with, I’d like to apologize.</p><p>My mea culpa goes out to anyone who had to behold the shameless spectacle that involved button-pushing comic Lisa Lampanelli using the word “nigga” in a tweet, <a href="http://www.xojane.com/entertainment/lisa-lampanelli-lena-dunham-tweet">then arguing</a> against a torrent of condemnation from the Twitterverse that it was socially acceptable.</p><p>You see, I have argued in print for years that people are too precious about avoiding the word “nigger” when the subject is at hand. When the NAACP held a funeral for the word, I wrote a column praising its intentions but opposing its actions.</p><p>A word should never be banned out of context, I argued. Especially a word with such conflicted and confusing history for those of us who are darker than blue.</p><p>When Spike Lee and other well-known cultural commentators began to pile on Quentin Tarantino for his liberal use of the N-word in his blaxploitation western masterpiece "Django Unchained," <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/tarantino_is_the_baddest_black_filmmaker_working_today/">I wrote a story for this very outlet</a> insisting that Tarantino had tapped a proud history in creating modern Hollywood’s first black superhero.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/is_it_ever_okay_for_white_people_to_say_the_n_word/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/is_it_ever_okay_for_white_people_to_say_the_n_word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>107</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: &#8220;SNL&#8221; Tarantino spoof goes biblical</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/17/must_see_morning_clip_snl_tarantino_spoof_goes_biblical/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/17/must_see_morning_clip_snl_tarantino_spoof_goes_biblical/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christoph waltz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13204396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fake trailer for "Djesus UnCrossed" might be the bloodiest bit in the sketch show's history ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christoph Waltz hosted "Saturday Night Live" this week, so you just knew the writers had to have a "Django Unchained" spoof up their sleeves. What you might not have guessed is just how <em>bloody </em>it would be.</p><p>Known more for fart jokes than they are for decapitations, the cast of "SNL" went for a Tarantino level of gory authenticity in their biblical revenge flick, "Djesus UnCrossed."</p><p>Starring Waltz as the son of God himself and featuring Taran Killam doing a a delightfully spot-on Brad Pitt (going after <em>Ro-mans</em>, naturally<em>),</em> the overall effect is pretty darn convincing.</p><p>Though you should be warned: It might be a <em>little </em>early to see a head get split in half, so maybe put your breakfast down while you watch.</p><p><iframe src="http://www.hulu.com/embed.html?eid=1jx4_dewbk6igmmzd_9diw" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="480" height="270"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/17/must_see_morning_clip_snl_tarantino_spoof_goes_biblical/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/17/must_see_morning_clip_snl_tarantino_spoof_goes_biblical/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s to blame for gun violence? Movie critics!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/16/whos_to_blame_for_gun_violence_movie_critics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/16/whos_to_blame_for_gun_violence_movie_critics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hunger Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Dark Knight Rises]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurora shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Shootings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13203925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a bizarre new essay, Thomas Frank suggests that Hollywood — and movie critics — are the NRA's "propaganda wing"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last the real villain has been revealed in our poisonous and circular culture of violence: It’s me. Well, OK, maybe not <em>me</em> personally, but the underpaid, disheveled and endangered tribe to which I semi-reluctantly belong, the movie critics. Even by an optimistic count, America is down to a few dozen professional film critics, most of whom traipse back and forth between screening rooms in Manhattan and Los Angeles, often appearing to have recently arisen at 7 o’clock in the evening. (The general fashion statement and social mode, as a friend once put it, is one of “Troll Under the Bridge.”) And yet, according to a baffling new article in Harper’s by cultural critic <a href="http://harpers.org/archive/2013/03/blood-sport/">Thomas Frank,</a> our sad-sack crew is a crucial enabler of American gun violence. (That’s a firewalled link, so I’ll try to quote liberally from the article while staying on the fair side of fair use.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/16/whos_to_blame_for_gun_violence_movie_critics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/16/whos_to_blame_for_gun_violence_movie_critics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harvey Weinstein: I screwed up on &#8220;The Master&#8221; and &#8220;Django&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/harvey_weinstein_says_he_screwed_up_on_the_master_and_django/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/harvey_weinstein_says_he_screwed_up_on_the_master_and_django/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 17:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvey Weinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Master]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver Linings Playbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13185986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an interview, the longtime Oscar maven concedes that he doesn't always have the winning strategy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harvey Weinstein doesn't need to offer recriminations. The Weinstein Co. producer, whose films have won the last two best picture Oscars and may go on to win a third if "Silver Linings Playbook" goes the distance, has his eye on the rare dark spots in his portfolio in a <a href="http://www.deadline.com/2013/01/mike-fleming-qas-harvey-weinstein-on-oscars-sundance-obama-and-getting-the-web-to-pay-up-for-borrowed-content/">recent interview with Deadline</a>.</p><p>While "Django Unchained," for instance, received an Oscar nomination for best picture, Weinstein takes the fall for Quentin Tarantino's absence in the best director category. "We tried to show it to people in theaters, not on DVD," he said, noting that the film's "screeners" sent to voters went out later than is typical. "It’s an epic movie and that man put his whole life and heart into this. It’s his most important movie, his most important subject matter, and the idea of DVDs stopped me cold. And I stopped them. I wouldn’t do it." Ah, well!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/harvey_weinstein_says_he_screwed_up_on_the_master_and_django/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/harvey_weinstein_says_he_screwed_up_on_the_master_and_django/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Django Unchained&#8221; dolls violate eBay&#8217;s &#8220;offensive materials&#8221; policy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/django_unchained_dolls_violate_ebays_offensive_materials_policy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/django_unchained_dolls_violate_ebays_offensive_materials_policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2013 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eBay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django dolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13182167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The auction site has banned the controversial doll]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EBay has banned the sale of <a href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/NECA-DJANGO-UNCHAINED-6-ACTION-FIGURE-COMPLETE-RARE-SET-BROOMHILDA-STEPHEN-/230913368444?pt=US_Action_Figures&amp;hash=item35c382617c&amp;nma=true&amp;si=RTEcOcErhjdOpXyiqp9pJsfollM%253D&amp;orig_cvip=true&amp;rt=nc&amp;_trksid=p2047675.l2557">NECA's infamous "Django Unchained" dolls</a>, action figures inspired by Quentin Tarantino's controversial slave revenge western. <a href="http://www.deadline.com/2013/01/ebay-bans-django-unchained-dolls-offensive/">Deadline</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>Listings for the dolls “were removed as they were in violation of our Offensive Materials policy”, an eBay representative tells Deadline. EBay forbids offensive products “that graphically portray graphic violence or victims of violence, unless they have substantial social, artistic, or political value” including “racially or ethnically offensive language, historical items, reproductions, and works of art and media”.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/django_unchained_dolls_violate_ebays_offensive_materials_policy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/25/django_unchained_dolls_violate_ebays_offensive_materials_policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tarantino drops the N-bomb</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/tarantino_drops_the_n_bomb_backstage_at_the_globes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/tarantino_drops_the_n_bomb_backstage_at_the_globes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Globes 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anton Fuqua]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spike Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13170746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The director's language backstage at the Golden Globes leaves reporters speechless]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a career spanning over two decades, Quentin Tarantino has made abundantly clear all the things he greatly loves to insert into his films. Epic bloodshed. Pop culture references that show off the breadth of his knowledge of cinema. And the word "nigger."</p><p>Boy, does he love to give his characters the chance to say that one. Think Dennis Hopper's coolly manipulative speech about Sicilians in <a href="http://youtu.be/_svnsF5OLbI">"True Romance."</a>  The dead body storage problem in <a href="http://youtu.be/I-7f7vVCqvI">"Pulp Fiction."</a> Steve Buscemi's attempt to break up a fight in "Reservoir Dogs." And boy does it reliably tick people off. So fond is Tarantino of the word that it's a wonder it took him so long to figure out that if he made a movie set in the plantation-era South, he could deploy the word all the time, because, you know, history. So it should have come as zero surprise to anyone that after winning a Golden Globe Sunday evening for his epithet-laced "Django Unchained" screenplay, he would then use the word to talk about the controversy about using the word.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/tarantino_drops_the_n_bomb_backstage_at_the_globes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/tarantino_drops_the_n_bomb_backstage_at_the_globes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama goes on the offensive with his Defense pick</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/obama_goes_on_the_offensive_with_his_defense_pick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/obama_goes_on_the_offensive_with_his_defense_pick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13170622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president's nomination of Chuck Hagel forces Republicans to come to terms with the party's rightward shift]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> The Republican Party is given these days to hysteria, and what appears at the moment to be a white-guy cabinet in the second Obama term is more likely the result of botched orchestration than anything. That doesn’t mean there isn’t something to South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham’s contention that the president is deliberately getting in the opposition’s face with his recent nominations. As those of us who have been supportive of the president wrestle with the moral question of whether he deserves as much grief as we would have given a newly elected Mitt Romney for filling the three biggest jobs in his administration with old white males, or whether Obama’s first term—including a female secretary of State and two female Supreme Court appointments—earns him some slack, the Machiavellian genius of the choices is lost. The Republicans are in disarray not because they drew some particularly wacky names from a hat when it came to fielding congressional candidates but because their constituency is wacky, something so obvious that the only option for pols and pundits alike is to ignore it: A third of the country is fucking out of its mind. Of course some portion of the country always has been out of its mind, which is what Steven Spielberg’s <em>Lincoln</em> and Quentin Tarantino’s <em>Django Unchained</em> are about, and the country’s task always has been transcending this. But now that Republican psychosis has become so pronounced even the party itself is beset by flashes of self-awareness, a cleave has developed into which Field Marshal Barack drives his pincer division of Kerry, Hagel, and Lew.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/obama_goes_on_the_offensive_with_his_defense_pick/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/obama_goes_on_the_offensive_with_his_defense_pick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Salon&#8217;s 2013 Golden Globe Awards liveblog</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/salons_2013_golden_globe_awards_liveblog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/salons_2013_golden_globe_awards_liveblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Poehler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Globes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Miserables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Bigelow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breaking Bad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parks and Recreation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Golden Globes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13167637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Argo" and "Les Miz": Best films. "Homeland" and "Girls": Best TV shows. Jodie Foster comes out! Amy and Tina rock]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[liveblog id=47]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/salons_2013_golden_globe_awards_liveblog/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/salons_2013_golden_globe_awards_liveblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quentin Tarantino talks to himself</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/quentin_tarantino_talks_to_himself/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/quentin_tarantino_talks_to_himself/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Golden Globes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inglorious basterds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulp fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Semitism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nazis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mikhail bakhtin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13167609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russian critic Mikhail Bakhtin posed that stories talk to one another. If only he'd lived to see Tarantino's films]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The eccentric Russian intellectual Mikhail Bakhtin, writing on literature and semiotics from around 1919 until his death in 1975, had this crazy idea: Stories talk to one another. Bakhtin theorized that authors cobble narratives together from various “languages,” combining and juxtaposing familiar motifs, images and tropes from other stories as well as cultural associations, history and even clichés to tell a new tale. An active “listener-reader,” to use Bakhtin's term, simultaneously senses many levels to each story – the characters talking to one another within the story, the narrator telling us the story and the author speaking through the story. These levels engage in dialogue with one another, and the listener-reader constructs meaning by eavesdropping on their conversation. The different levels also address the artworks and narratives from which they have been created. They talk back.</p><p>In many stories, the author, like a magician, tries to hide his or her hand. But Bakhtin's ideas prove especially helpful in talking about stories where the author's presence comes through strong – like the movies of Quentin Tarantino.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/quentin_tarantino_talks_to_himself/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/quentin_tarantino_talks_to_himself/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tarantino gives the NRA ammo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/tarantino_gives_the_nra_ammo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/tarantino_gives_the_nra_ammo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13168852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hollywood's not to blame for Newtown — but refusing to talk about media violence only empowers the enemy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, Vice President Joe Biden <a href="http://www.thewrap.com/movies/column-post/movies-tv-come-out-unscathed-meeting-violence-biden-72521">held a meeting</a> at the White House with several big-shot representatives of the entertainment industry. On the same day, Quentin Tarantino had a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/do_not_accuse_quentin_tarantino_of_promoting_real_violence/">TV interview</a> go off the rails when a British journalist steered away from the masturbatory puffery of movie junkets and tried to get him to talk about something serious.</p><p>Those are pretty much the last factual statements you’re getting from me today, because we now enter the netherworld of opinion, contested research, prejudice and prevarication surrounding the issue of media violence, in which nobody knows anything and every utterance should be treated as dubious ass-covering.</p><p>Thursday’s White House meeting was one in a series of gatherings Biden is hosting as chair of a post-Newtown presidential task force on gun violence. Others may or may not have involved substantive discussion, but this one was evidently designed to placate people who are concerned about the effects of violent entertainment without actually broaching the topic. To go by the joint statement issued afterward by the showbiz bigwigs, it may have been the most guarded and noncommittal conversation in Washington history:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/tarantino_gives_the_nra_ammo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/tarantino_gives_the_nra_ammo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>131</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tarantino flunks American history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/tarantino_flunks_american_history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/tarantino_flunks_american_history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inglourious Basterds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Louis Gates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13168754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even by its own pulp standards, "Django Unchained" is grossly inaccurate -- and perpetuates dangerous stereotypes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><p>Black abolitionists. Black outlaws. Black gunslingers of the west, south, east or north. These are the three groups of people that truly scare white Americans. And they rarely, if ever, appear on a Hollywood screen. They don't appear in Quentin Tarantino's <em>Django Unchained</em>, either.</p><p>So what do we get? A violently entertaining, rugged individualist and shallow "abolitionist" by the name of Django, a bounty hunter whose killing spree is sanctioned by the U.S. government. That would be the same government which, in 1858, maintains "the peculiar institution" of slavery as a legal entity in many states. The same government that in most circumstances would have considered Django as bounty to be captured, not the bounty hunter. But this is Tarantino's playground.</p><p>Watch Tarantino in interviews. He's rather cocky about the history he thinks he's relating to Americans (which is sad, actually), so while <em>Django</em> is not a documentary, it's not "just a movie," either. Unfortunately, much critical history is lost or completely skewed in Tarantino's telling, even when totally unnecessary. This is a major flaw in a film that is supposed to be about a black superhero turning the tables on history. The problem is, you have to know the history first.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/tarantino_flunks_american_history/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/12/tarantino_flunks_american_history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>129</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do not accuse Quentin Tarantino of promoting real violence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/do_not_accuse_quentin_tarantino_of_promoting_real_violence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/do_not_accuse_quentin_tarantino_of_promoting_real_violence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 21:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real violence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13168632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He will "shut your butt down" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quentin Tarantino is <em>really</em> sick of being asked if there's a link between his movies and real-world violence. <em></em></p><p>In an interview for Britain's Channel 4 News, the "Django Unchained" director got heated after Krishnan Guru-Murthy asked, "Why are you so sure that there's no link between enjoying movie violence and enjoying real violence?"</p><p>Tarantino did not like that question one bit, and he was quick to say as much.</p><p>"Don't ask me a question like that -- I'm not biting ... I refuse your question ... It's none of your damn business what I think about that!" he shot back.</p><p>He went on to say that after answering the same question for 20 years, he's simply tired of talking about it. "The reason I don't want to talk about it is because I've said everything I have to say about it," he explained.</p><p>And perhaps the best part?</p><p>"I haven't changed my opinion one iota ... and I am <em>shutting your butt down</em>."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/GrsJDy8VjZk" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/do_not_accuse_quentin_tarantino_of_promoting_real_violence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/do_not_accuse_quentin_tarantino_of_promoting_real_violence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Django Unchained&#8217;s&#8221; secret political triumph</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/django_unchaineds_secret_triumph/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/django_unchaineds_secret_triumph/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2013 00:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Weeklings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inglourious Basterds]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13167730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's been pilloried for trivializing American slavery. What matters is that it's got people talking about race]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.theweeklings.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/11/weeklings_new_small.png" alt="The Weeklings" align="left" /></a>  OVER THE WEEKEND I had the luxury of seeing <em>Django Unchained</em>, Quentin Tarantino’s slavery-centered revenge fantasy. Like everything the gore-obsessed culture monger has produced, from <em>Pulp Fiction </em>to <em>Kill Bill, </em>I found myself wrapped up in a narrative so inventive I was in no time cheering along as the taskmasters bled out. I’ve had long conversations with more film-savvy friends on Mr. Tarantino’s artistic merits. Sure, some of them are enamored, but others find him too liberal with his tendency to borrow—more of a master of post-modern pastiche than an authentic auteur, while posing as the latter. I can’t say I don’t sympathize. As someone interested in authenticity (in literature, especially), I can’t fault those who take Tarantino’s obsession with Kung Fu movies, Spaghetti Westerns, and scene stalking to task. Still, with each release I find myself unflinchingly in awe; whether or not I’m being spoon-fed what’s already been done, Tarantino’s films accomplish the goal of playing with a viewer’s perception of past and present. He does wonders with rendering violence surreal, while, of course, polarizing the hell out of his audience.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/django_unchaineds_secret_triumph/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/11/django_unchaineds_secret_triumph/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Baytown Outlaws&#8221;: A Tarantino wannabe takes on rednecks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/baytown_outlaws_a_tarantino_wannabe_takes_on_rednecks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/baytown_outlaws_a_tarantino_wannabe_takes_on_rednecks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Boondock Saints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Baytown Outlaws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billy Bob Thornton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13166084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Billy Bob Thornton and Andre Braugher provide window-dressing for the racist fantasy of "The Baytown Outlaws"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m tempted to tell you that, except for its thoroughly repellent racial and sexual politics, the imitation-Tarantino action flick called <a href="http://www.phase4films.com/detail.aspx?projectId=aa97a738-cfc9-e111-adc0-000c2955671b">“The Baytown Outlaws”</a> – which you could be watching on your TV or computer or mobile device right now, instead of “working” – isn’t much worse than <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/django_unchained/">“Django Unchained.”</a> But that’s admittedly like saying that, except for that episode in Ford’s Theatre, John Wilkes Booth was one of the cooler Americans of the 19th century.</p><p>How’s that for sneaking two Oscar contenders into an article about a January VOD release that will never be nominated for any awards by anybody? In all seriousness, I’m not sure whether to recommend “The Baytown Outlaws” as a guns ‘n’ glory time-waster or warn you off it as a piece of mendacious trash. So I’ll do both. A superficial and stylish redneck-sploitation spree, “Baytown Outlaws” has no real reason to exist beyond the quest for cash. Its appealing B-plus supporting cast, including Billy Bob Thornton, Eva Longoria and Andre Braugher, almost elevate it to the level of mainstream mediocrity – but then again, that was never the goal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/baytown_outlaws_a_tarantino_wannabe_takes_on_rednecks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/09/baytown_outlaws_a_tarantino_wannabe_takes_on_rednecks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could a black director have made &#8220;Django&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/could_a_black_director_have_made_django/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/could_a_black_director_have_made_django/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Django]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tarantino's daring film would have been received differently by the media -- or never made -- if he wasn't white]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For two reasons, Quentin Tarantino’s "Django Unchained" was all but guaranteed to ignite a conversation about race in America.</p><p>First and foremost, the film dares to break a major taboo. Specifically, as the <a href="http://movies.nytimes.com/2012/12/25/movies/quentin-tarantinos-django-unchained-stars-jamie-foxx.html?pagewanted=all">New York Times critic A.O. Scott</a> put it, "Django" dares to show "regenerative violence visited by black against white instead of the reverse" -- a narrative that "has been almost literally unthinkable" in American life, much less in big-budget pop culture productions.</p><p>Second, the film does that in the immediate aftermath of a racially charged election that saw a black man reelected to the White House with the most diverse (read: non-white) coalition in presidential history.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/could_a_black_director_have_made_django/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/28/could_a_black_director_have_made_django/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
