<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Race</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 23:26:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Al Jazeera different than Fox?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Jazeera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9-11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[current tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time warner cable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arabs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... or MSNBC? The Qatari network had a rough intro a decade ago and Time Warner -- and others -- won't forget ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Qatari network Al Jazeera’s purchase of Al Gore’s Current news channel, <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/02/al-jazeera-said-to-be-acquiring-current-tv/">revealed yesterday</a>, has already hit a snag: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/02/time-warner-al-jazeera-current-tv_n_2399370.html">Time Warner Cable promptly dropped Current</a>, denying the forthcoming Al Jazeera America access to Time Warner subscribers.</p><p>Though the Time Warner decision had reportedly been threatened due to Current’s low ratings, there’s no denying that at least some segment of the U.S. viewing public has long harbored antipathy toward Al Jazeera. <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/01/03/liberal-al-gore-becomes-very-rich-hypocrite-with-sale-current-tv/">An editorial published today</a> by Fox News runs through the talking points about the network it calls “anti-American terror mouthpiece Al Jazeera.” Among them: “Al Jazeera, known as the network of the Arab Street, is also known for taking anti-American, anti-Israel and pro-terror positions.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/can_al_jazeera_win_over_american_news_junkies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tarantino is the baddest black filmmaker working today</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/tarantino_is_the_baddest_black_filmmaker_working_today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/tarantino_is_the_baddest_black_filmmaker_working_today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Relations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Foxx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samuel jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pulp fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academy Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Awards Season]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Django Unchained" is the perfect revenge fantasy for black people -- except that it was made by a white man]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some folks who won’t like to read these words: White guy superstar director Quentin Tarantino may be the baddest black filmmaker working in big-time Hollywood movies today.</p><p>That is a possibility which angers some, frightens others and disgusts a few more, saying as much or more about the sorry state of movie audiences today and the still-closed world of big-time filmmaking than any tart provocation Tarantino has managed to splash on the screen.</p><p>The reason we’re having this conversation — again — is thanks to the latest addictive confection of revenge film, spaghetti Western, Blaxploitation movie and anti-slavery fantasy Q.T. dropped on us all to close out 2012: <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/tarantinos_incoherent_three_hour_bloodbath/">"Django Unchained."</a></p><p>Beyond the fact that it is gleefully bloody, luxuriating in crimson-splattered shootouts at a time when America is deeply conflicted over how much it loves this stuff, "Django Unchained" uncorks the perfect revenge fantasy for black people descended from slaves and living in a still-white-dominated society.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/tarantino_is_the_baddest_black_filmmaker_working_today/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/tarantino_is_the_baddest_black_filmmaker_working_today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tarantino&#8217;s incoherent three-hour bloodbath</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/tarantinos_incoherent_three_hour_bloodbath/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/tarantinos_incoherent_three_hour_bloodbath/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2012 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quentin Tarantino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jamie Foxx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[samuel l jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonardo DiCaprio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13154752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Django Unchained" has action, comedy, fake history and oceans of blood -- but it's an endless, undisciplined mess]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/quentin_tarantino">Quentin Tarantino</a> no longer makes movies; he makes trailers. <a href="http://unchainedmovie.com/">“Django Unchained”</a> feels like a three-hour trailer for a movie that never happens, a slavery-revenge melodrama cum salt-‘n’-pepper action film that would be awesome if it actually existed. Like so many trailers, it’s packed with memorable scenes that don’t go anywhere, and keeps promising payoffs that remain theoretical. It’s got Western scenery on a grand scale and scenes of madcap comedy involving inept members of the Ku Klux Klan. It’s got veritable geysers and fountains and gushers of blood, an ocean of fake gore even by Tarantino’s standards. You could claim that he’s “quoting from Sam Peckinpah” with those slapsticky water balloons full of blood, except that that’s not quite it. It’s more like he’s quoting from crappy ‘70s drive-in movies that were quoting from “The Hills Have Eyes,” which was quoting from something else that was quoting from Peckinpah. (I may be missing an intermediate stage there, such as a cannibal film that was dubbed from Italian into Spanish and projected once, with the reels out of sequence, at a downtown Los Angeles theater in 1983.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/tarantinos_incoherent_three_hour_bloodbath/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/26/tarantinos_incoherent_three_hour_bloodbath/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fiscal cliff factions: Brown v. Gray?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/fiscal_cliff_factions_brown_v_gray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/fiscal_cliff_factions_brown_v_gray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlement reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pitting "the next America" vs. white seniors is divisive and dangerous]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronald Brownstein's latest National Journal story describes a hidden and fascinating fault line in the "fiscal cliff" debate: not between Democrats and Republicans but "<a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/behind-the-fiscal-cliff-is-a-demographic-struggle-20121220?page=1">between the Brown and the Gray</a>." Brownstein is one of the best mainstream reporters covering the politics of American demographic change, and he lays out a tough truth: The lion's share of public resources today are going to seniors, 80 percent of whom are white, while a shrinking proportion goes to young people, a majority of whom are now black, Latino and Asian. Thus the way we solve the fiscal cliff crisis – by depicting it as a crisis, Brownstein displays a bias toward an establishment narrative that favors Republicans, but otherwise, the piece is fairly neutral – has racial as well as political and generational implications.</p><p>Brownstein is identifying a fault line, not creating it, let alone endorsing it. He raises points that are well worth discussing. But I wince at such a catchy depiction of polarization – even though Brownstein is right about the way particularly wealthy white seniors have gobbled up resources for themselves while denying them to others.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/fiscal_cliff_factions_brown_v_gray/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/fiscal_cliff_factions_brown_v_gray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is the shooter always male?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/why_is_the_shooter_always_male/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/why_is_the_shooter_always_male/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[male violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serial muders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stats don't lie. Instead of asking why America is so violent, perhaps we need to focus on one particular sex]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common demand made of socially marginalized groups is that they take responsibility for the bad acts of their members.  These demands come both from socially privileged people who marginalize social outsiders and from the socially marginalized themselves.</p><p>For instance, I just Googled “black on black crime,” and the <a href="http://www.theroot.com/buzz/where-outcry-when-attack-black-black">very first link </a>that came up  was to a blog post by an African-American writer, discussing the relative lack of attention the writer claimed the African-American community pays to crimes committed by black people against other black people.</p><p>This is an example of how, in America, a white person who commits a crime is merely a criminal, while a black person who commits a crime is a <em>black </em>criminal.  In other words, being black in America tends to make one a member of what sociologists call a “marked category.”</p><p>The easiest way to explain what that means is to contrast it with its opposite: If I ask you to picture a police officer, what does this person look like?  I’m pretty confident that, whatever other characteristics the person may have, he is a man – just as if I ask you to picture a kindergarten teacher, you almost certainly will conjure up an image of a woman. We don’t usually notice the gender of male police officers because we expect police officers to be men: In this context, maleness is an unmarked category.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/why_is_the_shooter_always_male/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/why_is_the_shooter_always_male/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local news can&#8217;t handle the ugly truth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/local_news_cant_handle_the_ugly_truth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/local_news_cant_handle_the_ugly_truth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UCLA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hate Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misogyny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asian American]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UCLA's been battling a growing problem with hate speech on campus. Why won't local media divulge the dirty details?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is plenty that's horrible about a racist, sexist act of vandalism at the University of California, Los Angeles. But along with the crime itself, there's yet another depressing aspect to the story: the way it's been reported.</p><p>On Wednesday, students discovered a handwritten sign on a bathroom stall door in the school's Powell Library that read, "Asian Women are White-Boy Worshipping Sluts." It was the second such incident in as many days. On Tuesday, a sign saying "asian women R Honkie white-boy worshipping Whores" was tacked to a Vietnamese Student Union sign on the campus's Kerckhoff Hall.</p><p>It's not the first time UCLA has battled racism, either. Last year, shortly after the Tohoku earthquake and tsunami, then-student <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/US/uclas-alexandra-wallace-apologizes-campus-asian-culture/story?id=13174245">Alexandra Wallace gained YouTube infamy</a> after posting a three-minute diatribe about the "hordes" of Asians in the school library, "going through their whole families just checking on everybody from the tsunami thing," adding, "I'll be typing away furiously, blah blah blah, and then all of the sudden, when I'm about to, like, reach an epiphany, over here from somewhere, 'OHH Ching chong ling long ting tong? OHH.'" (Wallace left the school soon after the clip went viral, saying she'd received death threats.) And last winter, a nearby apartment complex that houses students was <a href="http://blogs.laweekly.com/informer/2012/02/ucla_graffiti_mexican_racist_s.php">defaced with graffiti</a> against "you rude ignorant spic cunts" and "dirty Meximelt bitches."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/local_news_cant_handle_the_ugly_truth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/local_news_cant_handle_the_ugly_truth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans just don&#8217;t get it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/republicans_just_dont_get_it_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/republicans_just_dont_get_it_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 16:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stuart Stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Davis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hours after Stuart Stevens insults most Americans, Tom Davis credits Obama's victory to the "underclass"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Wednesday I finished <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/stuart_stevens_delusional_jackass/">my piece on Mitt Romney strategist Stuart Stevens</a> boasting that President Obama "only" won the votes of Americans who earn less than $50,000 – that's most people, by the way – and rushed to MSNBC's "Hardball" to discuss the GOP's diversity problems with supposedly moderate former Congressman Tom Davis of Virginia.</p><p>It was a calm, respectful conversation, until Davis volunteered that Romney lost because of Obama's voter turnout operation – specifically, his ability to turnout "underclass minorities" and "particularly those who orient toward the city" who were "pulled out of the apartments." Since we had been talking about the GOP's problems with women and people of color, I respectfully offered Davis some "free advice" – that it might be time to retire the term "underclass." It got worse.</p><p>Davis mumbled about the term not being "politically correct," and when I referenced Stevens's slur against people who make less than $50,000 a year, many of whom are actually middle class, Davis jumped in: "That's not where the voter turnout came, if you know your voter stats, it was really people who were making even less than that, pulled out of the apartments…groups that traditionally haven't voted." (Yes, I caught the condescending "if you know your voter stats.")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/republicans_just_dont_get_it_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/29/republicans_just_dont_get_it_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>106</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appeals court strikes down Michigan affirmative action ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/appeals_court_strikes_down_michigan_affirmative_action_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/appeals_court_strikes_down_michigan_affirmative_action_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Affirmative Action]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The court ruled that the ban, passed by referendum in 2006, violates the equal protection clause]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals struck down Michigan's ban on affirmative action by a margin of 8-7, though a Supreme Court appeal is likely.</p><p>Voters had passed the ban on affirmative action in 2006 by a statewide referendum, and last year a three-judge panel on the court struck it down. Michigan Attorney General Bill Schuette, who is defending the ban, had asked for an en banc hearing before the full 6th Circuit, which ruled last week.</p><p>From <a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/15/justice/michigan-affirmative-action-ban/">CNN</a>, Judge R. Guy Cole wrote the decision to overturn the ban:</p><blockquote><p>"'A black student seeking the adoption of a constitutionally permissible race-conscious admissions policy ... could do only one thing to effect change: She could attempt to amend the Michigan Constitution -- a lengthy, expensive and arduous process -- to repeal the consequences' of the ban, Cole wrote.</p> <p>On the other hand, a student could do several other things to persuade a college to alter its admissions policy to favor applicants' alumni connections, including lobbying the admissions committee or petitioning the university's leaders, Cole wrote.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/appeals_court_strikes_down_michigan_affirmative_action_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/appeals_court_strikes_down_michigan_affirmative_action_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Audio of Lee Atwater&#8217;s infamous &#8217;81 interview on the Southern strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/audio_of_lee_atwaters_infamous_81_interview_on_the_southern_strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/audio_of_lee_atwaters_infamous_81_interview_on_the_southern_strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 21:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Atwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072020</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Atwater told Republicans to appeal to racists]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an audio clip from 1981, obtained exclusively by Rick Perlstein at the Nation, you can hear campaign consultant Lee Atwater's infamous description of  the Republican "Southern Strategy," or how they can win the votes of racists without sounding like racists:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/X_8E3ENrKrQ" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p>Perlstein explains the context:</p><blockquote><p>The back-story goes like this. In 1981, Atwater, after a decade as South Carolina's most effective Republican operative, was working in Ronald Reagan's White House when he was interviewed by Alexander Lamis, a political scientist at Case Western Reserve University. Lamis published the interview without using Atwater's name in his 1984 book <em>The Two-Party South</em>. Fifteen years later—and eight years after Atwater passed away from cancer—Lamis republished the interview in another book using Atwater’s name. For seven years no one paid much attention. Then the <em>New York Times</em>' Bob Herbert, a bit of an Atwater obsessive, quoted it in an October 6, 2005 column—then five more times over the next four years.</p></blockquote><p>James Carter IV, who also unearthed Romney's 47 percent video, dug up the full interview with Atwater. You can listen to all 42 minutes at <a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/170841/exclusive-lee-atwaters-infamous-1981-interview-southern-strategy">the Nation</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/audio_of_lee_atwaters_infamous_81_interview_on_the_southern_strategy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/audio_of_lee_atwaters_infamous_81_interview_on_the_southern_strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What makes a police department tough on immigration?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/what_makes_a_police_department_tough_on_immigration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/what_makes_a_police_department_tough_on_immigration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law enforcement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13071045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Study: Administrative issues, local politics account for harsh policing more than any crime or unemployment rate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under President Obama, a record number of unauthorized immigrants have been deported from the United States. Within the country -- from state to state, city to city, police department to police department -- the enforcement of federal immigration policy also differs significantly.</p><p>A<a href="http://journalistsresource.org/studies/government/immigration/why-do-some-city-police-departments-enforce-federal-law"> new study </a>in the Journal of Public Administration Research looks at possible factors contributing to why some city police departments are particularly stringent on enforcing immigration law. "Many assume that in places where the political climate runs against unauthorized immigrants — and where longer-standing community members perceive the 'threat' of encroachment by new arrivals — there is automatically a backlash, manifest through law enforcement crackdowns. But research suggests these dynamics are often complex," noted the report from Arizona State University and John Jay College-CUNY.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/what_makes_a_police_department_tough_on_immigration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/what_makes_a_police_department_tough_on_immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney: Not white enough?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/weekly_standard_republicans_must_play_white_identity_politics_better_next_time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/weekly_standard_republicans_must_play_white_identity_politics_better_next_time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 16:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White people]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Weekly Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13067359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Weekly Standard's Jay Cost calls on the GOP to nominate someone its base will really love -- like Richard Nixon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look, I didn't plan to do too much celebratory/mean-spirited "mocking the losers" stuff after Tuesday, besides of course joining in my favorite new American Electoral Tradition, "spending Wednesday retweeting funny pre-election tweets from people who were really wrong." But <a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/morning-jay-barack-obama-and-triumph-identity-politics_662010.html?nopager=1">this Jay Cost column in the Weekly Standard</a> is full of so much delightful Republican bubble analysis, and it has such a remarkable prescription for the party as a whole, that I think it deserves a quick look.</p><p>The headline is "Barack Obama and the Triumph of Identity Politics." "Identity politics" is a conservative term for "attracting the votes of women and minorities." (Mitt Romney's <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/scocca/2012/11/mitt_romney_white_vote_parsing_the_narrow_tribal_appeal_of_the_republican.html">explicit plan to turn out as many white people as possible</a> is usually not considered "identity politics" for reasons you can probably figure out on your own.)</p><p>First, we establish that Obama has no mandate:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/weekly_standard_republicans_must_play_white_identity_politics_better_next_time/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/09/weekly_standard_republicans_must_play_white_identity_politics_better_next_time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>69</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s white working class firewall</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/obamas_white_working_class_firewall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/obamas_white_working_class_firewall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president is spending his last campaign day in Ohio, Iowa and Wisconsin -- states he was losing just a year ago]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama is zipping around the Midwest to Ohio, Wisconsin and Iowa, states that are now widely considered his firewall, on the final day of his 2012 campaign. That's because if he wins all three, given the pretty fixed red-blue map we all have emblazoned in our minds, he wins the election.</p><p>But a little over a year ago, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/09/30/us/politics/obama-sees-a-path-to-12-victory-beyond-the-rust-belt.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;pagewanted=all">the New York Times zeroed in on the Obama campaign's looming 2012 challenge</a>. He was way behind in Rust Belt states like Ohio, Wisconsin and Iowa that had carried him to victory in 2008. So the Obama team, the Times reported, was busy "charting an alternative course to re-election should he be unable to win Ohio and other industrial states traditionally essential to Democratic presidential victories."</p><p>The trouble in the Rust Belt states, the Times and other outlets reported, was that "his support <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Whats-Matter-White-People-Golden/dp/1118141067">among blue-collar white voters</a> far [was] weaker than among white-collar independents." Trailing in Ohio, Wisconsin and Iowa, the Obama campaign was focusing on states like "Virginia, Colorado and Nevada, maybe even Arizona, places where the new Obama coalition of minorities and college-educated whites would carry the president to victory."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/obamas_white_working_class_firewall/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/obamas_white_working_class_firewall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George Allen defended racial song</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/george_allen_defended_racial_song/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/george_allen_defended_racial_song/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Allen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a state lawmaker, the Virginia GOP Senate candidate defended the state's offensive official song]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virginia Republican Senate candidate George Allen is perhaps best known nationally for calling a Democratic tracker <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/06/george-allen-im-really-sorry-about-that-whole-1.php">a racial slur</a> during his 2006 Senate campaign. That year, Ryan Lizza reported in the New Republic that Allen kept a “<a href="http://www.tnr.com/print/article/george-allens-race-problem">noose hanging on a ficus tree</a> in his law office” and admitted to “prominently displaying a Confederate flag in his living room” when he ran for governor in 1993. This year, he’s managed to avoid embarrassing race issues, despite the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/27/george-allen-workers-voice-afl-cio_n_1918049.html">best efforts</a> of liberal critics to draw attention to his record.</p><p>But a video resurfacing today could make race an issue in the last two days of the campaign. The video shows Allen, then a member of the Virginia General Assembly, defending a song with racially insensitive lyrics. The song, “<a href="http://www.theroot.com/views/dont-carry-me-back-old-virginny">Carry Me Back to Old Virginny</a>,” became the state’s official song during the Jim Crow era. In the 1990s, there were several attempts to retire the song or change its lyrics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/george_allen_defended_racial_song/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/george_allen_defended_racial_song/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Obama failing the black community?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/is_obama_failing_the_black_community/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/is_obama_failing_the_black_community/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Powell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Sununu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fredrick Harris]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13056745</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An African-American intellectual wonders if he's getting cut slack because of his race -- and if it's fair to ask]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are black elites and intellectuals cutting President Obama slack as the price we pay for having a black president? On Oct. 27, the New York Times ran an Op-Ed by Columbia University political science professor Fredrick C. Harris, author of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0199739676/?tag=saloncom08-20">"The Price of the Ticket: Barack Obama and Rise and Decline of Black Politics,"</a> saying that we are. He suggests that we are so grateful for this crumb of progress, we’re willing to sacrifice the greater good of the African-American community. While Harris outlines Obama’s significant accomplishments, he says that African-Americans have stagnated or declined socioeconomically in nearly every measurable way. He takes Obama to task for not explicitly addressing race often or vigorously enough.</p><p>I have to say: Harris’ thinking seems not much better than John Sununu suggesting Colin Powell endorsed Obama because they're both black; it’s a strange notion that political support should demand so little. And it's a problematic argument, that the decisions of black intellectuals and voters about whom we support and how, are always grounded in race. This implies that we consider race before we consider anything else. This implies that we think with the color of our skin and the cultures from which we rise and above all else, so desperate must we be for scraps from the political table.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/is_obama_failing_the_black_community/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/30/is_obama_failing_the_black_community/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 signs racism still rules politics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/five_signs_racism_still_dominates_our_politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/five_signs_racism_still_dominates_our_politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Presidential Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tagg Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13046536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you noticed no one ever calls Joe Biden a Marxist? Just one of many double standards Obama faces regularly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The angry response to my <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/tagg_romney_mr_white_privilege/">Salon article last week on White Privilege</a> was as swift as it was predictable. To sum up the wave of bigoted blowback in my email box and on my Twitter feed, the argument from denialists seems to be that race is no longer a factor in American politics, and that therefore, those who mention bigotry in the context of President Obama are, in the ugly retrograde vernacular of the 1980s, "race hustlers" engaging in an unseemly ploy to change the subject from the current administration's policies.</p><p>It's certainly true that bigotry is not automatically synonymous with criticism of the Obama record. For instance, many liberals (including me) who question the substantive gap between candidate Obama's policy promises and his policy record are not doing so out of any racial animus; they are doing so out of a sense of democratic citizenship. Similarly, many honest conservatives who oppose the Obama administration's civil liberties atrocities and Drug War are doing so on principle rather than because of prejudice.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/five_signs_racism_still_dominates_our_politics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/five_signs_racism_still_dominates_our_politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For white chicks in afro wigs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/for_white_chicks_in_afro_wigs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/for_white_chicks_in_afro_wigs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13045670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A blogger takes flak for her silly race experiment, but I'm reminded of the complicated power of black women's hair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So there’s this crazy white chick running around New York wearing an Afro wig to tweak her perspective and experience life differently. She writes about this twisted Black Like Me-Watermelon Woman stunt on her blog <a href="http://beforeandafro.com/">Before and Afro</a> (get it?). And she’s <a href="http://www.postbourgie.com/2012/10/16/white-woman-wears-afro-life-changes-or-something/">getting flak</a> from people of all colors who think at best she’s insensitive, at worst racist and perhaps mentally unhinged and in need of medication.</p><p>The negative chatter <a href="http://beforeandafro.com/2012/10/12/frod-chicken/">kicked up last week</a> when the blogger, Michelle Joni, attended a fried chicken festival and blogged that it was “obviously an occasion to wear the fro.”</p><p>“You are a walking cliché,” reads one of the comments on her site. “A white person that believes Black culture, heritage, and natural BEING is something to poke fun at, to have fun with, to experiment with, and to belittle. Because that is exactly what you’re doing, whether you mean to or not.</p><p>Here’s another: “From one white girl to another – please just stop. You are hurting people. You are wearing their identity and culture as a costume that you can put on and take off.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/for_white_chicks_in_afro_wigs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/19/for_white_chicks_in_afro_wigs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tagg Romney: Mr. White Privilege</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/tagg_romney_mr_white_privilege/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/tagg_romney_mr_white_privilege/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Presidential Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tagg Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13044539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tagg Romney admits he'd like to slug Obama, becoming the latest white man that thinks he can say whatever he wants]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tagg Romney, grandson of George Romney, son of Mitt Romney, is the latest flesh-and-blood embodiment of White Privilege on the national presidential stage. Though that stage has historically been a catwalk for the whitest and most privileged in the world, Tagg is in a class few achieve. With his lineage and his inherited wealth he equals George W. Bush when it comes to getting advantages by virtue of nothing more than whose crotch he popped out of in the hospital delivery room.</p><p>Now, thanks to his comments yesterday, he has surpassed even Bush, becoming not just an image of White Privilege, but an example of how that privilege quietly operates in too much of America.</p><p>In a <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppins/tagg-romney-wanted-to-take-a-swing-at-obama-duri#HTWF2">post-debate interview</a> with a North Carolina radio station, Tagg was asked about his visceral reaction to President Obama, and he said his first thought was that he wanted to "jump out of your seat and you want to rush down to the stage and take a swing at him." He then laughed and added, "But you know you can't do that because, well, first because there's a lot of Secret Service between you and him."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/tagg_romney_mr_white_privilege/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/tagg_romney_mr_white_privilege/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>325</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morgan Stanley sued for subprime discrimination</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/morgan_stanley_sued_for_subprime_discrimination/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/morgan_stanley_sued_for_subprime_discrimination/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morgan Stanley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subprime Loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13041052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A class-action suit alleges that the investment bank steered black borrowers to bad mortgages]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Civil Liberties Union Monday filed a class action lawsuit against investment bank Morgan Stanley alleging racial discrimination in subprime mortgage practices.</p><p>As Colorlines <a href="http://colorlines.com/archives/2012/10/aclu_sues_morgan_stanley_for_discrimination_in_subprime_mortages.html?utm_source=dlvr.it&amp;utm_medium=twitter">noted</a>, "The class-action lawsuit, submitted in a federal court a stones throw from the New York Stock Exchange, alleges that Morgan Stanley [via now-bankrupt financial agent, New Century Mortgage Company] intentionally steered blacks in the Detroit metropolitan region into subprime loans. Blacks who were credit-worthy and qualified for traditional mortgages were caught up in Morgan Stanley’s biased dragnet."</p><p>Of the 9 million foreclosures since 2007, four out of 10 have been against people of color. Both Bank of America and Wells Fargo have settled discrimination lawsuits over steering black and Latino borrowers into subprime loans. "Race was laced throughout Wall Street’s activities," Colorlines' Imara Jones commented.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/morgan_stanley_sued_for_subprime_discrimination/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/morgan_stanley_sued_for_subprime_discrimination/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Master of the Mountain&#8221;: The real truth about Thomas Jefferson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/master_of_the_mountain_the_real_truth_about_thomas_jefferson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/master_of_the_mountain_the_real_truth_about_thomas_jefferson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Founding Fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slavery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[What to Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Jefferson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13039141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forget Sally Hemings -- a historian discovers the ugliest side of a founding father in his ledgers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No founding father wrote more eloquently on behalf of liberty and human rights than Thomas Jefferson, and none has a more troubling record when it comes to the "peculiar institution" of slavery. At present, the popular understanding of Jefferson's shilly-shallying on this issue doesn't extend much deeper than knowing smirks about Sally Hemings and the (unacknowledged) children Jefferson fathered with her. We tend to assume that the dirtiest secrets of the past have to do with sex. But, as Henry Wiencek explains in his new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0374299560/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Master of the Mountain: Thomas Jefferson and His Slaves,"</a> the real filth is in the ledger books.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/master_of_the_mountain_the_real_truth_about_thomas_jefferson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/master_of_the_mountain_the_real_truth_about_thomas_jefferson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will whites see a black indie film like &#8220;Middle of Nowhere&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/will_whites_see_a_black_indie_film_like_middle_of_nowhere/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/will_whites_see_a_black_indie_film_like_middle_of_nowhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Middle of Nowhere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13037229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This gorgeous, sober drama about the human costs of prison deserves a broader audience than it's likely to get]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s already an extremely tough marketplace for small independent films that arrive without a lot of brand identity or star power, and it might be three times tougher when you’re talking about a movie like Ava DuVernay’s <a href="http://www.middlenowhere.com/">“Middle of Nowhere”</a> – a beautiful, sober and even grave social drama with an entirely African-American cast. (OK, Sharon Lawrence has a dispensable bit part as a hard-ass white lawyer.) This is an issue guaranteed to make everyone feel uncomfortable, but it does no good to run away from it: There’s very little audience (black, white or otherwise) for black-oriented films that aren’t about gangsters or rappers, or that aren’t Tyler Perry–style moralistic melodramas. In fact, experience tells me it’ll be tough to get people to read this article, let alone see the film.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/will_whites_see_a_black_indie_film_like_middle_of_nowhere/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/will_whites_see_a_black_indie_film_like_middle_of_nowhere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>