<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Race</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 03:12:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>What everyone gets wrong about Jeremy Lin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/22/what_everyone_gets_wrong_about_jeremy_lin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/22/what_everyone_gets_wrong_about_jeremy_lin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy LIn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12405171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I wrote a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/interview_with_my_bully_when_i_confronted_my_bully_about_racism/">Salon essay</a> about my experiences with racial bullying growing up in northern Minnesota; particularly, a pair of girls who decided to sing “ching-ching-a-ling” and pull their eyes into slits when they saw me in seventh-grade gym class. It was painful to write, and — from the responses I received — pretty painful to read, especially by anyone who had experienced bullying. Thus, it felt almost as if counteracting forces in the universe were acting to promote Jeremy Lin’s farm-team-to-bench-to-global-superstar ascent in the basketball world. Finally! Being Asian American was <em>cool</em>, not something to be bullied over.</p><p>I happened to be in New York at the apogee of Lin hysteria, and I stopped into a sports store near Times Square in hopes of scoring his jersey as a Valentine’s Day present for my husband. After swimming through a chaotic but amiable crowd, despite it being near midnight, I was dismayed to find only unwanted XXXXXXXL sizes. A clerk confirmed there were no more; in fact they’d <em>just</em> gotten their first shipment -- and it had been decimated by feral shoppers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/22/what_everyone_gets_wrong_about_jeremy_lin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, I wrote a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/interview_with_my_bully_when_i_confronted_my_bully_about_racism/">Salon essay</a> about my experiences with racial bullying growing up in northern Minnesota; particularly, a pair of girls who decided to sing “ching-ching-a-ling” and pull their eyes into slits when they saw me in seventh-grade gym class. It was painful to write, and — from the responses I received — pretty painful to read, especially by anyone who had experienced bullying. Thus, it felt almost as if counteracting forces in the universe were acting to promote Jeremy Lin’s farm-team-to-bench-to-global-superstar ascent in the basketball world. Finally! Being Asian American was <em>cool</em>, not something to be bullied over.</p><p>I happened to be in New York at the apogee of Lin hysteria, and I stopped into a sports store near Times Square in hopes of scoring his jersey as a Valentine’s Day present for my husband. After swimming through a chaotic but amiable crowd, despite it being near midnight, I was dismayed to find only unwanted XXXXXXXL sizes. A clerk confirmed there were no more; in fact they’d <em>just</em> gotten their first shipment &#8212; and it had been decimated by feral shoppers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/22/what_everyone_gets_wrong_about_jeremy_lin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/22/what_everyone_gets_wrong_about_jeremy_lin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The real problem with honoring Whitney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/the_real_problem_with_honoring_whitney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/the_real_problem_with_honoring_whitney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whitney Houston]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12396521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If any single political figure in America is a flesh-and-blood personification of a Rorschach test, it is Republican New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. In almost every way, he raises vexing questions which ultimately say more about us than they do about him.</p><p>Is he, for instance, <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_spectator/2012/02/chris_christie_s_going_down_gaffe_the_whole_jersey_fat_guy_authenticity_thing_is_over_.html">refreshingly authentic or just downright offensive</a>? Is he<a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/30/why_no_ones_talking_about_newts_weight/"> regular-guy fat or too obese to be president</a>? Is he a rare moderate Republican who is at least <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/25/nyregion/christie-wants-new-jersey-voters-to-decide-on-gay-marriage.html">willing to discuss legalizing gay marriage</a> or is he a standard GOP bigot who is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/18/nyregion/christie-vetoes-gay-marriage-bill.html">deftly maneuvering to prevent such legalization</a>?</p><p>How you answer all of these questions is a matter of political identity -- your answers all but determine where you fall on the larger political map, and in the process, highlight your assumptions about a whole host of issues.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/the_real_problem_with_honoring_whitney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If any single political figure in America is a flesh-and-blood personification of a Rorschach test, it is Republican New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie. In almost every way, he raises vexing questions which ultimately say more about us than they do about him.</p><p>Is he, for instance, <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/the_spectator/2012/02/chris_christie_s_going_down_gaffe_the_whole_jersey_fat_guy_authenticity_thing_is_over_.html">refreshingly authentic or just downright offensive</a>? Is he<a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/30/why_no_ones_talking_about_newts_weight/"> regular-guy fat or too obese to be president</a>? Is he a rare moderate Republican who is at least <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/25/nyregion/christie-wants-new-jersey-voters-to-decide-on-gay-marriage.html">willing to discuss legalizing gay marriage</a> or is he a standard GOP bigot who is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/18/nyregion/christie-vetoes-gay-marriage-bill.html">deftly maneuvering to prevent such legalization</a>?</p><p>How you answer all of these questions is a matter of political identity &#8212; your answers all but determine where you fall on the larger political map, and in the process, highlight your assumptions about a whole host of issues.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/the_real_problem_with_honoring_whitney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/the_real_problem_with_honoring_whitney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Key &amp; Peele&#8217;s&#8221; edge-less, post-racial lie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/key_peeles_toothless_post_racial_lie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/key_peeles_toothless_post_racial_lie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12396441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Comedy Central's new sketch show "Key &amp; Peele" (Tuesday, 10:30 p.m. Eastern) is neither funny nor daring. And since these are the show's two goals, it has failed miserably.</p><p>"Key &amp; Peele's" deep flaws have gone unnoticed by the <a href="http://watching-tv.ew.com/2012/01/31/key-and-peele-obama-keegan-michael-key-jordan-peele/">majority</a> <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/tv/la-et-key-peele-20120131,0,1250966.story">of</a> <a href="http://guyism.com/entertainment/tv/video-key-peele-is-the-best-comedy-show-you-may-not-be-watching.html">reviewers,</a> and I suspect this is due to the attractiveness of the package: Comics Keegan Michael Key and Jordan Peele are black folk who, like most white critics, want to move<em> past</em> race. In our sincere but hasty desire to actualize this mythical post-racist world, Key and Peele are the jackpot. Two light-skinned black men, middle-class in mannerism, who, like our black president, have white mothers. (It's also been popular with viewers; the show was Comedy Central's most-watched premiere since 2009, and was just picked up for a second season.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/key_peeles_toothless_post_racial_lie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/key_peeles_toothless_post_racial_lie/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/key_peeles_toothless_post_racial_lie/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/key_peeles_toothless_post_racial_lie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/21/key_peeles_toothless_post_racial_lie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rooting for your own kind</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/16/politically_lincorrect_rooting_for_your_own_kind/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/16/politically_lincorrect_rooting_for_your_own_kind/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Basketball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy LIn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12369781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Lin-sanity has broken out all over the world. The kid nobody in the NBA wanted, from an ethnic group about as associated with the NBA as bullfighters are with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, had just broken Shaquille O’Neal’s league record for the most points in his first five games as a starter. Adoring fans are holding up <a href="http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/knicks/post/_/id/11777/spike-to-mayweather-recognize-lins-talent">signs</a> saying “To Lin-finity and beyond.” The <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/08/jeremy_lins_social_media_fast_break/">Lin-ternet</a> has broken under the strain of millions of tweets, many of them featuring even worse puns than “Lin-ternet.” Sports Illustrated put him on its <a href="http://www.ivyleaguesports.com/information/gen-releases/2011-12/releases/Harvard-s_Lin_Makes_Sports_Illustrated_Cover">cover</a>.</p><p>And, of course, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/15/the_jeremy_lin_show/">Asian-Americans are going wild</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/16/politically_lincorrect_rooting_for_your_own_kind/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/16/politically_lincorrect_rooting_for_your_own_kind/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/16/politically_lincorrect_rooting_for_your_own_kind/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/16/politically_lincorrect_rooting_for_your_own_kind/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/16/politically_lincorrect_rooting_for_your_own_kind/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My debate with Charles Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/my_debate_with_charles_murray/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/my_debate_with_charles_murray/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12359461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I debated Charles Murray today on WBUR's "On Point" with Tom Ashbrook. You can listen to it <a href="http://onpoint.wbur.org/2012/02/14/charles-murray">here</a>.</p><p>I shouldn't admit this, but I almost didn't review Murray's "Coming Apart: The State of White America, 1960 to 2010." I told my editors it was just a mashup of his two most infamous books, "Losing Ground" and "The Bell Curve:" Welfare programs make poverty worse, not better, and social support can't help the poor and struggling rise up, anyway, because they're low-IQ losers. Only in this book, Murray confined his analysis to poor and struggling white people, to defuse charges of racism that greeted his two earlier bestsellers. <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/charles_murray_does_it_again/singleton/">I decided to write about the book anyway</a>, but I thought it would be of little interest except to wonky people like me.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/my_debate_with_charles_murray/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/my_debate_with_charles_murray/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/my_debate_with_charles_murray/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/my_debate_with_charles_murray/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/my_debate_with_charles_murray/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview With My Bully: When I confronted my bully about racism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/interview_with_my_bully_when_i_confronted_my_bully_about_racism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/interview_with_my_bully_when_i_confronted_my_bully_about_racism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interview With My Bully]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12348461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Judy Blume, my mentor and friend, told me not to engage with my bully. “Forget her, she isn’t worth it,” she told me. But I had a strange curiosity over what happened to the woman -- I'll call her Mary -- who had once been my tormentor. Over the years I’d developed a secret theory of bullies, that they were the ultimate softies, the ones who have to build a fearsome spiked carapace over some sad, sad hurt. It's that kind of empathy, perhaps, that made me a novelist. And Mary certainly gave me a story to tell.</p><p>Bullying, unfortunately, was a part of the warp and weave of my childhood. I grew up in northern Minnesota in the '70s, where my Asian family was the only color in a sea of Scandinavians. When I was in second grade, a crew-cutted boy shoved me against some metal monkey bars, cracking the back of my head open.</p><p>But the most difficult time came when I entered junior high. I was underweight, bookish, bespectacled. Gym class was a convergence of all my anxieties. The other girls were tall with pretty hair that feathered and training bras, while I had no breasts and not even an undershirt for camouflage underneath the one-piece uniforms that looked like a baby’s onesie.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/interview_with_my_bully_when_i_confronted_my_bully_about_racism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/interview_with_my_bully_when_i_confronted_my_bully_about_racism/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/interview_with_my_bully_when_i_confronted_my_bully_about_racism/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/interview_with_my_bully_when_i_confronted_my_bully_about_racism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/14/interview_with_my_bully_when_i_confronted_my_bully_about_racism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>121</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPAC welcomes white nationalists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/cpac_welcomes_white_nationalists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/cpac_welcomes_white_nationalists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Derbyshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12326901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>CPAC is here, so it's time for everyone's annual look at the psychos invited to the premier conservative event of the year, and those unfortunate enough to have been excluded.</p><p>GOProud, the gay Republican group that was founded because the Log Cabin Republicans were considered too concerned about gay civil rights and not sufficiently focused on "fiscal issues," is not invited this year, because they are <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/11/goproud_too_aggressive/singleton/">too "aggressive"</a> about being gay, which made Jim DeMint uncomfortable.</p><p>CPAC also <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2011/07/29/goproud-and-birchers-ousted-as-cpac-co-sponsors-david-horowitz-survives-vote/">uninvited the John Birch Society</a>, which had made a triumphant return to mainstream conservative acceptance in 2010, when they co-sponsored the conference.</p><p>But! While the Birchers and the open homosexualists are no longer welcome, there is still room for multiple outspoken white nationalists!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/cpac_welcomes_white_nationalists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/cpac_welcomes_white_nationalists/">http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/cpac_welcomes_white_nationalists/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/cpac_welcomes_white_nationalists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/09/cpac_welcomes_white_nationalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>195</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Charles Murray does it again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/charles_murray_does_it_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/charles_murray_does_it_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Murray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12260491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Hey, white people – <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/who_believes_in_the_american_dream/">they're talking about you again</a>!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/when_white_people_lack_bourgeois_values/">I argued a few weeks ago</a> that <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/25/mitt_and_newt_need_one_another_to_fight_obama/singleton/">Newt Gingrich</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/rick_santorum_working_class_hero_or_free_market_fanatic/singleton/">Rick Santorum</a> might be able to believe they're not singling out black people, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/rick_santorum_flip_flops_on_black_people/singleton/">or "blah" people</a>, when they rail against food stamps and government "dependency" on the campaign trail. Yes, Republicans have long used not just dog whistles but foghorns to tell white working- and middle-class voters that welfare programs only support lazy, undeserving African-Americans. Ronald Reagan gave us those iconic Cadillac-driving "welfare queens" and "young bucks" using food stamps to buy T-bone steaks. <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/the_gops_peculiar_vocabulary_of_race/singleton/">Gingrich is certainly playing on that long history with his remarks</a>. (It's funny how our first "food stamp president" also happens to be black.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/charles_murray_does_it_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/charles_murray_does_it_again/">http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/charles_murray_does_it_again/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/charles_murray_does_it_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/30/charles_murray_does_it_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>177</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP race-baiting masks class warfare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/27/gop_race_baiting_masks_class_warfare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/27/gop_race_baiting_masks_class_warfare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12249051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's commonplace to note that Newt Gingrich's dog-whistle appellation that Barack Obama is the “food stamp president” is both racist and politically cynical. But the stereotyping of black government dependency also serves the strategic end of discrediting the entire social safety net, which most Americans of all races depend on. Black people are subtly demonized, but whites and blacks alike will suffer.</p><p>Gingrich persists because it's a dependable applause line, and because his political fortunes keep rising. Compare that to September, when Mitt Romney <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/11256/1174322-84-0.stm?cmpid=nationworld.xml">attacked</a> then-candidate Rick Perry for calling Social Security a “Ponzi scheme.” Perry backtracked, insisting that he only wanted to bolster the program and ensure its solvency. But in his 2010 book “Fed Up,” Perry made his opposition to Social Security clear, calling it “a crumbling monument to the failure of the New Deal.” Scrapping entitlements is a core tenet of contemporary fiscal conservatism, but most of the time politicians only get away with attacking the most vulnerable ones: Medicaid, food stamps and welfare cash assistance, which are means-tested and thus associated with the black (read: undeserving) poor, although whites make up a <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/09/santorum-defends-comments-about-food-stamps/">far greater share</a> of food stamp recipients. Government welfare programs with Teflon political defenses — Medicare and Social Security — are nearly universal entitlements and thus associated with “regular” (read: white) Americans.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/27/gop_race_baiting_masks_class_warfare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/27/gop_race_baiting_masks_class_warfare/">http://www.salon.com/2012/01/27/gop_race_baiting_masks_class_warfare/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/27/gop_race_baiting_masks_class_warfare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/27/gop_race_baiting_masks_class_warfare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our selective stance on bigotry</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/the_everyday_bigotry_we_ignore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/the_everyday_bigotry_we_ignore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12198231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>If they have any value at all anymore, presidential election campaigns at least remain larger-than-life mirrors reflecting back painful truths about our society. As evidence, ponder the two-sided debate over Republican candidate Ron Paul and bigotry.</p><p>One camp cites Paul's hate-filled newsletters and his libertarian opposition to civil rights regulations as evidence that he aligns with racists. As the esteemed scholar Tim Wise puts it: This part of Paul's record proves that he represents "the reactionary, white supremacist, Social Darwinists of this culture, who believe ... the police who dragged sit-in protesters off soda fountain stools for trespassing on a white man’s property were justified in doing so, and that the freedom of department store owners to refuse to let black people try on clothes in their dressing rooms was more sacrosanct than the right of black people to be treated like human beings."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/the_everyday_bigotry_we_ignore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/the_everyday_bigotry_we_ignore/">http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/the_everyday_bigotry_we_ignore/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/the_everyday_bigotry_we_ignore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/20/the_everyday_bigotry_we_ignore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>411</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV&#8217;s eerie new race-less world</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/tvs_eerie_new_race_less_world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/tvs_eerie_new_race_less_world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Treme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12184081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>NBC's <a href="http://www.nbc.com/parenthood/">"Parenthood"</a> is a trick show that people tuckered out by life are eager to believe in. I am one of these tired people. Its bustling mornings, carefully disheveled interiors, and impromptu kitchen dance-parties create the illusion of safe chaos. "Parenthood" knows that for the modern television viewer,  controlled disorder is better than none, for safe chaos tricks you into believing that what you’re watching isn’t totally sanitized. Strategically placed ad-libbing, background chatter and overlapping dialogue combine to slyly convince you of its authenticity -- that not only does "Parenthood" belong to an age of realism and daring and diversity, but it’s helping create it.</p><p>It reminds me very much of my eighth-grade teacher who so desperately hoped to be the mythic sage who made a difference, but failed to realize his well-meaning musings about why “black families can’t stay together these days” did little to raise our awareness of anything other than his own desire to seem good. And this is what "Parenthood" does in its broad-stroke coverage of everything that could happen in the life of a modern American family. Since we're all terrified of being different, there is some point in airing things we might still regard with shame: infidelity, moving back with your parents, not going to college, raising an autistic child, and, finally, interracial dating. As the end product of an interracial date, I find this last theme most interesting. On the show, it’s explored in two story lines.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/tvs_eerie_new_race_less_world/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/tvs_eerie_new_race_less_world/">http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/tvs_eerie_new_race_less_world/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/tvs_eerie_new_race_less_world/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/18/tvs_eerie_new_race_less_world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>67</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The dumbest third-grade assignment ever?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/the_dumbest_third_grade_assignment_ever/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/the_dumbest_third_grade_assignment_ever/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12000741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Let's see if you're smarter than a Gwinnett County third-grade math teacher. If, in the year 2012, an Atlanta-area elementary school asks its students to solve arithmetic problems about how much fruit a slave can pick -- and how many beatings he might get in a week -- exactly how many rounds of ammunition has that school just fired into its own feet?</p><p>In the most misguided attempt at social understanding since <a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/13/tropic_thunder/ ">Kirk Lazarus donned blackface</a>, Beaver Ridge Elementary School decided earlier this term to shoehorn a little of the antebellum into its math worksheets. "Each tree had 56 oranges. If eight slaves pick them equally, then how much would each slave pick?" asks one. Another posits, "If Frederick got two beatings per day, how many beatings did he get in one week?" Let's see ... Divide by eight, multiply by seven … got it. The answer is, "Oh my God are you people crazy?"</p><p>In a surprise to exactly no one, save the school's faculty, parents were displeased to discover their children -- the majority of whom are minorities – were being grilled on the subjects of slave labor and ass whippings. Apparently at Beaver Ridge, there are four R's – reading, writing, arithmetic and racism. As one stunned father told local station WSB-TV, "It blew me away."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/the_dumbest_third_grade_assignment_ever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/the_dumbest_third_grade_assignment_ever/">http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/the_dumbest_third_grade_assignment_ever/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/the_dumbest_third_grade_assignment_ever/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/the_dumbest_third_grade_assignment_ever/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When white people lack &#8220;bourgeois values&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/when_white_people_lack_bourgeois_values/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/when_white_people_lack_bourgeois_values/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12001161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>"When the family breaks down, the economy breaks down," <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/rick_santorum_working_class_hero_or_free_market_fanatic/singleton/">Rick Santorum intoned</a> in his Iowa caucus "victory" speech Tuesday night (by the time he finished speaking, he'd lost the lead to Romney). Santorum's bromide showed only a glimmer of the way the conservative "family values" crowd connects America's worsening economic troubles to the decline of marriage, especially among the middle and working classes. It's a fascinating worldview that colors the entire GOP primary campaign, in which actual policies to help workers and families are rejected in favor of those that cut government and shackle women to the home, and it needs to be better understood.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/when_white_people_lack_bourgeois_values/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/when_white_people_lack_bourgeois_values/">http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/when_white_people_lack_bourgeois_values/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/when_white_people_lack_bourgeois_values/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/09/when_white_people_lack_bourgeois_values/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gingrich contradicts self on &#8220;food stamps&#8221; racial connotation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/gingrich_contradicts_self_on_food_stamps_racial_connotation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/gingrich_contradicts_self_on_food_stamps_racial_connotation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 16:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=11967371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When Newt Gingrich, last May, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/15/gingrich_food_stamp_president/">called Barack Obama</a> "the most successful food stamp president in American history," everyone understood what he meant. But when David Gregory asked Gingrich to be more explicit about his point, Gingrich took offense. How dare you accuse Gingrich of using "racially tinged language!"</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7oDHF8bnrU8" frameborder="0" width="450" height="259"></iframe></p><p>The transcript:</p><blockquote><p>GREGORY: First of all, you gave a speech in Georgia with language a lot of people think could be coded racially-tinged language, calling the president, the first black president, a food stamp president.</p>
<p>GINGRICH: Oh, come on, David.</p>
<p>GREGORY: What did you mean? What was the point?</p>
<p>REP. GINGRICH: That's, that's bizarre. That--this kind of automatic reference to racism, this is the president of the United States. The president of the United States has to be held accountable. Now, the idea that--and what I said is factually true. Forty-seven million Americans are on food stamps. One out of every six Americans is on food stamps. And to hide behind the charge of racism? I have--I have never said anything about President Obama which is racist.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/gingrich_contradicts_self_on_food_stamps_racial_connotation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/gingrich_contradicts_self_on_food_stamps_racial_connotation/">http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/gingrich_contradicts_self_on_food_stamps_racial_connotation/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/gingrich_contradicts_self_on_food_stamps_racial_connotation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/06/gingrich_contradicts_self_on_food_stamps_racial_connotation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Santorum flip-flops on black people</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/rick_santorum_flip_flops_on_black_people/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/rick_santorum_flip_flops_on_black_people/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=11915191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Formerly surging GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/rick_santorums_rude_awakening/">now struggling</a>, is trying to deny ever saying, "I don’t want to make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money. I want to give them the opportunity to go out and earn the money.” Even though the day after <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/02/rick_santorums_best_week_ever/singleton/">he appeared to make that familiar old GOP argument</a>, he didn't deny it. What gives?</p><p>Let me try to give Santorum the benefit of the doubt, for a minute. Even on Monday, I noted that his "black people" comment seemed like a strange non sequitur, because no one was talking about race. The former Pennsylvania senator was in the middle of a typical rant about welfare, specifically Medicare, when he made the remark. On the other hand, I watched and listened to the CBS News video repeatedly, and I had no doubt he said "black people."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/rick_santorum_flip_flops_on_black_people/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/rick_santorum_flip_flops_on_black_people/">http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/rick_santorum_flip_flops_on_black_people/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/rick_santorum_flip_flops_on_black_people/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/05/rick_santorum_flip_flops_on_black_people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>116</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul and his racist newsletters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/22/ron_paul_and_his_racist_newsletters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/22/ron_paul_and_his_racist_newsletters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10797821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It is a fact that in the 1990s Ron Paul sold a newsletter in which a bunch of racist comments were published under his byline. We now <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/updates/3057">also have evidence</a> that Paul is lying when he claims not to have read the racist newsletters, <a href="http://reason.com/archives/2008/01/16/who-wrote-ron-pauls-newsletter">which were most likely written by Lew Rockwell.</a></p><p>Here's Paul on C-SPAN in 1995, talking about his newsletters:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/eW755u5460A" frameborder="0" width="420" height="315"></iframe></p><p>The fact is, Paul has lied like a very old-fashioned sort of politician about these newsletters, and he has been lying for years. He has gone through the motions of public regret about their contents, but has never acknowledged knowing who wrote the offensive material or even being aware that offensive material went out under his name. That's bullshit. Now he ducks questions on the subject entirely (and his supporters complain that it's "old news," because they have no serious defense of the comments or Paul's responsibility for them).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/22/ron_paul_and_his_racist_newsletters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/22/ron_paul_and_his_racist_newsletters/">http://www.salon.com/2011/12/22/ron_paul_and_his_racist_newsletters/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/22/ron_paul_and_his_racist_newsletters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/22/ron_paul_and_his_racist_newsletters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>344</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The persistent &#8220;post-racial&#8221; fallacy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/the_persistant_post_racial_fallacy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/the_persistant_post_racial_fallacy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10316078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the annals of contemporary American history, the power of white denialism and the "post-racial" fallacy is not to be underestimated. As race scholar <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wnet/tavissmiley/interviews/anti-racist-activist-tim-wise/">Tim Wise</a> has recounted, in the early 1960s, most white Americans told Gallup pollsters that African-Americans had equal economic and educational opportunities to get ahead.</p><p>Those were the results, mind you, at the height of the Jim Crow era, when discrimination and white-on-black racial violence were out in the open and, in many cases, celebrated. So it's no surprise that with that kind of overt bigotry now underground, white denialism of persistent institutional racism is alive and well, according to new national survey data analyzed by the Greenlining Institute.</p><p>As the watchdog group's <a href="http://www.greenlining.org/resources/pdfs/PostRaciallayoutforGIwebsite.pdf">report</a> finds:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/the_persistant_post_racial_fallacy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/the_persistant_post_racial_fallacy/">http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/the_persistant_post_racial_fallacy/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/the_persistant_post_racial_fallacy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/13/the_persistant_post_racial_fallacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Occupy Wall Street too white?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/is_occupy_wall_street_too_white/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/is_occupy_wall_street_too_white/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10192060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There is some truth to the contention that the nationwide Occupy Wall Street is largely a white-led movement, as indicated in <a href="http://mije.org/mmcsi/business/media-coverage-racial-participation-occupy-wall-street" target="_blank">a recent Maynard Institute article</a> by Nadra Kareem Nittle. But claiming there are “few people of color among the participants,” as Nittle does, is simply not true.</p><p>I say that as someone who was present when the Occupy Wall Street began in New York on Sept. 17 and who has visited 15 occupation sites around the country. I was at Zuccotti Park almost every day for the first three weeks of the occupation and I saw it transition from a movement almost exclusively of white youth to a broad left movement to a multiracial movement and finally to something that represents the composition of this country more accurately than almost any other social phenomenon we can imagine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/is_occupy_wall_street_too_white/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is some truth to the contention that the nationwide Occupy Wall Street is largely a white-led movement, as indicated in <a href="http://mije.org/mmcsi/business/media-coverage-racial-participation-occupy-wall-street" target="_blank">a recent Maynard Institute article</a> by Nadra Kareem Nittle. But claiming there are “few people of color among the participants,” as Nittle does, is simply not true.</p><p>I say that as someone who was present when the Occupy Wall Street began in New York on Sept. 17 and who has visited 15 occupation sites around the country. I was at Zuccotti Park almost every day for the first three weeks of the occupation and I saw it transition from a movement almost exclusively of white youth to a broad left movement to a multiracial movement and finally to something that represents the composition of this country more accurately than almost any other social phenomenon we can imagine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/is_occupy_wall_street_too_white/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/is_occupy_wall_street_too_white/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If Tolkien were black</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/if_tolkien_were_black/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/if_tolkien_were_black/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.R.R. Tolkien]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10177605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the most visible exemplars of epic fantasy -- from J.R.R. Tolkien to such bestselling authors as George R.R. Martin and Robert Jordan -- a casual observer might assume that big, continent-spanning sagas with magic in them are always set in some imaginary variation on Medieval Britain. There may be swords and talismans of power and wizards and the occasional dragon, but there often aren't any black- or brown-skinned people, and those who do appear are decidedly peripheral; in "The Lord of the Rings," they all seem to work for the bad guys.</p><p>Our hypothetical casual observer might therefore also conclude that epic fantasy -- one of today's most popular genres -- would hold little interest for African-American readers and even less for African-American writers. But that observer would be dead wrong. One of the most celebrated new voices in epic fantasy is N.K. Jemisin, whose debut novel, <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D9780316043922%26">"The Hundred Thousand Kingdoms,"</a> won the Locus Award for best first novel and nominations for seemingly every other speculative fiction prize under the sun. Another is David Anthony Durham, whose <a href="http://click.linksynergy.com/deeplink?mid=36889&amp;id=FYUtulI7nw4&amp;murl=http%3A%2F%2Fsearch.barnesandnoble.com%2Fbooksearch%2FISBNInquiry.asp%3FEAN%3D9780385722520%26">Acacia Trilogy</a> has landed on countless best-of lists. Both authors recently published the concluding books in their trilogies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/if_tolkien_were_black/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/if_tolkien_were_black/">http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/if_tolkien_were_black/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/if_tolkien_were_black/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/if_tolkien_were_black/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Perry does not support Confederate license plates</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/rick_perry_does_not_support_confederate_licence_plates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/rick_perry_does_not_support_confederate_licence_plates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confederate flag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10149840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Texas governor and <a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/26/teenagers_for_rick_perry/">teenage heartthrob</a> Rick Perry has a history of <a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/07/13/rick_perry_sons_of_confederate_veterans/">politically expedient affection for the Confederate States of America</a>, but he has apparently now decided that public displays of the Confederate battle flag should probably not be endorsed and promoted by the government of the Civil War-winning United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/perry-against-texas-confederate-license-plates-despite-past-defense-of-confederate-symbols/2011/10/26/gIQAq48bJM_story.html">According to the AP</a>, Perry said he doesn't support a campaign (<a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/25/rick_perrys_chance_for_leadership/singleton/">mentioned by Joan Walsh earlier this week</a>) by the Sons of Confederate Veterans to introduce specialty license plates featuring an unambiguously hateful symbol of white supremacy.</p><blockquote><p>The Republican presidential hopeful was in Florida for a fundraiser and told Bay News 9’s “Political Connections” and the St. Petersburg Times that, “we don’t need to be opening old wounds.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/rick_perry_does_not_support_confederate_licence_plates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read this story at <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/rick_perry_does_not_support_confederate_licence_plates/">http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/rick_perry_does_not_support_confederate_licence_plates/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/rick_perry_does_not_support_confederate_licence_plates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/rick_perry_does_not_support_confederate_licence_plates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

