<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > rachel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/rachel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:51:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>PBS takes a bullet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/bad_pbs_good_pbs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/bad_pbs_good_pbs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rachel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sesame street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Bird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Lehrer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Presidential Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Rich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13030308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The morning after the debate, PBS finds itself both the cause and the scapegoat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span>One of the more schizophrenic outcomes of last night’s Obama-Romney debate, and the <span>insta</span>-panic Obama’s poor performance has fomented among liberals, has to do with PBS. The morning after, the Public Broadcasting System finds itself both scapegoat and call to arms, with liberals simultaneously dissing moderator Jim <span>Lehrer</span> and embracing the ever-adorable Big Bird.</span></p><p><span>On MSNBC last night, after the debate had wrapped, Rachel <span>Maddow</span> refrained from naming a “winner” (her colleagues would not be so polite — or is it partisan?) but did say she thought Jim <span>Lehrer</span>, elder (and elderly) statesman of PBS, had officially put the nail in the coffin of this particular debate format. By near </span><a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jQBmvyciuvH7PAQX0ewFpqqe2Ieg?docId=d70f4f0b6e18491987813891dba7bfc9">universal assessment</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/jim_lehrer_useless/"><span><span>Lehrer</span> did a bad job,</span></a><span> but <span>Maddow</span> was spinning, taking the focus off Obama and putting it on <span>Lehrer</span> with a bit of blame-shifting. As Frank Rich wrote on Twitter last night, “</span><a href="https://twitter.com/frankrichny/status/253693969408610304"><span><span>Lehrer</span> can't be blamed for Obama's failings</span></a><span>. His own were dreadful enough.” But <span>Lehrer</span> is still shouldering some of the criticism for a less-than-stellar-for-the-Democrats debate.</span></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/bad_pbs_good_pbs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/bad_pbs_good_pbs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
