<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Readers and Reading</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/readers_and_reading/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Can you identify?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/can_you_identify/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/can_you_identify/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Science shows that the only way around some readers' prejudices is to trick them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The news of recent research documenting how readers identify with the main characters in stories has mostly been taken as confirmation of the value of literary role models. Lisa Libby, an assistant professor at Ohio State University and co-author of a study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, explained that subjects who read a short story in which the protagonist overcomes obstacles in order to vote were more likely to vote themselves several days later.</p><p>The suggestibility of readers isn't news. Johann Wolfgang von Goethe's novel of a sensitive young man destroyed by unrequited love, "The Sorrows of Young Werther," inspired a rash of suicides by would-be Werthers in the late 1700s. Jack Kerouac has launched a thousand road trips. Still, this is part of science's job: Running empirical tests on common knowledge -- if for no other reason than because common knowledge (and common sense) is often wrong.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/can_you_identify/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/can_you_identify/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>43</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading, revolutionized</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/reading_revolutionized/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/reading_revolutionized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Imprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12852691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A poet/book artist and a programmer team up to create a book that unites the traditional and the electronic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imprint.printmag.com"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.salon.com/img/partners/ID_imprint.gif" alt="Imprint" align="left" /></a><a href="http://www.sigliopress.com/books/bps.htm">"Between Page and Screen,"</a> a groundbreaking <a href="http://www.betweenpageandscreen.com/">collaboration</a> between poet and book artist Amaranth Borsuk and programmer Brad Bouse, is truly a first: a book that only can be read when simultaneously using a codex book and a computer’s webcam. When placed in front of a webcam, the black shapes printed on the pages, sans words, trigger animated text on the screen, revealing a correspondence between characters P and S.</p><p>[caption id="" align="alignleft" width="370" caption="via Between Page and Screen"]<img class=" " src="http://www.betweenpageandscreen.com/images/feature_book.jpg" alt="" width="370" height="285" />[/caption]</p><p>As e-readers continue to gain market share within the publishing industry and the “future of the book” remains a much bandied about phrase among publishers, writers, agents, booksellers and readers, "Between Page and Screen" has embraced the what-ifs and used them to achieve their true potential, an astoundingly realized book that shuns either/or designations. It champions both the book’s esteemed history by valuing ink printed on the page and also celebrates the potential of digital technologies that are resulting in all of us, no matter our preferences, having to change how we read.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/reading_revolutionized/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/reading_revolutionized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stories don&#8217;t need morals or messages</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/31/stories_dont_need_morals_or_messages/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/31/stories_dont_need_morals_or_messages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12248041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A "stupid" test shows that the Puritan ethic lives on. Why do we insist on learning lessons from the books we read?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the purpose of reading stories, especially made-up stories? That's the question lurking behind a recent posting to the New York Times' education blog, SchoolBook. Ann Stone and Jeff Nichols, the parents of twins, wrote about taking their kids' third-grade English Language Arts test with some friends as a party game on New Year's Eve. The group read an inane little story about tiger cubs learning to tear bark off logs, but, to their surprise, couldn't agree on a single answer to the multiple choice question that followed: "What is this story <em>mostly</em> about?"</p><p>Tests like this, the couple asserts, do students "a double disservice: first, by inflicting on them such mediocre literature, and second, by training them to read not for pleasure but to discover a predetermined answer to a (let’s not mince words) stupid question." The problem, they feel, stems from the standardized testing regime, which forces the learning experience into a too-rigid structure. Even a "banal" story like this tiger-cub number admits "multiple interpretations," and the prod to "reduce the work to a single idea" does a disservice to both reader and text.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/31/stories_dont_need_morals_or_messages/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/31/stories_dont_need_morals_or_messages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reader responses: Books you want banned</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/books_you_want_banned/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/books_you_want_banned/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Wednesday, we asked which books you think kids should never have to read in school. Here's what you said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, Laura Miller and other Salon writers weighed in on <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/2011/09/28/books_which_deserve_banning/index.html" class="storyLink">books they'd like to see banned from school reading lists</a> -- from "Lord of the Flies" ("Is it pure sadism [that makes teachers assign that book]?" asked Andrew O'Hehir) to "Ivanhoe," which went a fair way toward dulling Life editor Sarah Hepola's enthusiasm for high school English.</p><p>Laura also asked readers to weigh in on their least favorite books from their school days, and you were quick to volunteer (there are <a href="http://letters.salon.com/books/2011/09/28/books_which_deserve_banning/view/?show=all" class="storyLink">nearly 200 comments</a> on the article so far).</p><p>So, which books won't we be finding on your grown-up bookshelves, with 8th-grade annotations and yellowed endpapers lovingly preserved?</p><p>Well, for one thing, some of you really, really don't like "Ethan Frome." In your eyes, it's not just "tedious." It's also "bleak," "depressing" and "insufferable" enough to "[crush] your soul." And if anything, "Silas Marner" is even more unpopular; one commenter quipped that it ought to be "hurled into the Mariana Trench."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/books_you_want_banned/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/books_you_want_banned/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What did you really read this summer?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/27/summer_reading_slideshow/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/27/summer_reading_slideshow/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2011/08/27/summer_reading_slideshow</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As August ends, Arthur Phillips, Laura Hillenbrand, Lev Grossman and others reveal their reading records to Salon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For readers, summer often starts with grand ambition. This will be the year we really tackle Roberto Bola&#241;o or David Foster Wallace; it will be the summer of nothing but lemonade and Alice Munro. Or perhaps we'll educate ourselves by delving deep into accounts of the financial crisis or the war on terror. Then the days turn lazy and even the most sincere intentions wilt in the heat.</p><p>With September looming, we thought it would be a good time to check in with some of our favorite authors -- and some of the writers you're likely to be reading this fall -- to see what they <em>really</em> read this summer. Click through the following slide show to see what they had to say.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/27/summer_reading_slideshow/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/27/summer_reading_slideshow/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can a computer ever give good book recommendations?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/booklamp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/booklamp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/08/24/booklamp</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest and most ambitious attempt to turn literary taste into an algorithm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recommending books is an art, replete with mysteries and moments of inexplicable grace. When I wrote about the topic last year, John Warner -- sometime "Biblioracle" at the website the Morning News -- reminisced happily about the time he "went out on a limb and recommended 'Gravity's Rainbow,' and the person said it 'changed my life.'"</p><p>The occasional triumph (and perhaps only a fellow recommender will appreciate just how sweet such instances can be) are inevitably balanced out by mortifying failures. Though it was over a decade ago, I'll never forget the time a friend chewed me out for suggesting she read Louise Erdrich's "The Beet Queen." It seemed the perfect choice after I'd ruminated on all the other novels she said she'd liked, but she complained that Erdrich's women characters were all "victims" who refused to do anything to improve their lot.</p><p>Can a task this ineffable be automated? Many seem to think so. For years, Amazon and other e-booksellers have offered their customers suggestions based on the purchases of other customers who bought the same books. But you don't necessarily read every book you buy from an online retailer (some are gifts) and you probably don't like every book you read, either. For that matter, the books you like best you may have bought elsewhere, or borrowed from a friend.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/booklamp/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/24/booklamp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Books you can dance to</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/books_you_can_dance_to/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/books_you_can_dance_to/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2011/08/19/books_you_can_dance_to</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["One Day" author David Nicholls and others create playlists to enrich the ties between writer, reader and character]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a music-infused movie, the soundtrack to "One Day" is tasteful but limited -- '90s trip-hop, late-era Tears for Fears, college-radio one-hit wonders, a new Elvis Costello song. It's easy enough to imagine Emma (Anne Hathaway) and Dexter (Jim Sturgess) two 1988 graduates of the University of Edinburgh with a Del Amitri or James poster on their dorm-room wall.</p><p>Actually, it might be <em>too</em> easy. A much better sense of Emma's sensibility -- cool Britannia like Prefab Sprout, Cocteau Twins, Billy Bragg and Everything But the Girl alongside English major mainstays Patti Smith, Joni Mitchell and Joan Armatrading -- appears on author and screenwriter David Nicholls' website. Nicholls has imagined the two mix tapes Emma gives Dexter (one from 1989, the other from 2000) and created <a href="http://open.spotify.com/user/david.nicholls16/playlist/5R5Pbp1LZcik93VWLhGXK3">Spotify</a> and iTunes playlists where they can be streamed or purchased.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/books_you_can_dance_to/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/19/books_you_can_dance_to/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading retreats: Paradise for book lovers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/reading_retreats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/reading_retreats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/07/11/reading_retreats</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to get away from everything but your books in a country house or an Italian castle]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'll be absent from these pages for the next four weeks while I hole up in a cabin far from both the Internet and reliable cell phone reception. Whenever I tell people about my plans, they ask me which books I'll be taking with me.</p><p>Too many books would make this something of a busman's holiday for a reviewer, but I've packed a big stack all the same. Vacations, with their seclusion, quiet and idleness, invite long bouts of reading. Or, rather, they do when they don't involve visiting a big city, staying with chatty relatives or herding kids. All too often, the books treasured up for the summer are still unread on Labor Day.</p><p>So why not plan a vacation devoted exclusively to reading? Twice annually, Bill Gates schedules a week-long "reading retreat" during which he does nothing but pore over the books and papers he's set aside during the year. He's not alone: The idea seems particularly popular in the UK, where you can sign up at London's School of Life to receive a customized book list (they have "bibliotherapists" on staff to compile one based on a telephone consultation) and lodging in one of several modern country houses. The website promises "the perfect combination of great books and great architecture."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/reading_retreats/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/12/reading_retreats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The greatest books that never were</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/invisible_library/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/invisible_library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libraries and librarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/07/05/invisible_library</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Literature is full of imaginary books. Given the choice, which one would you read?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imaginary books seem to be nearly as numerous as the real ones, and that's even when you don't count all those bestselling thrillers people believe they'll write someday if only they can find the time to <em>write the damn thing down</em>. Nonexistent books certainly have some devoted fans, such as the proprietor of the ever-diverting Beachcomber's Bizarre History Blog, who is making bold moves to expand the collection known as the Invisible Library.</p><p>"The Invisible Library" has, for at least a decade or so, referred to those books that exist only within works of fiction. A man named Brian Quinette founded a website by that name in the late 1990s, presenting it as a catalog of "imaginary books, pseudobiblia, artifictions, fabled tomes, libris phantastica, and all manner of books unwritten, unread, unpublished and unfound."</p><p>The original Invisible Library disappeared from the Web in the mid-2000s (though you can still find snapshots of it in the Internet Archive Wayback Machine), and since then other pseudobibliophiles have opened their own "branches," although these too have a tendency to end up abandoned. The novelists Ed Park and Levi Stahl created a catalog of imaginary titles that inspired an interactive exhibition at a London art gallery, but they have only occasionally updated it since 2008. Loss of interest is, perhaps, inevitable, since when you maintain such a list, tiresome people are constantly proclaiming their disappointed astonishment that their particular obscure favorite isn't listed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/invisible_library/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/invisible_library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>78</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;ve stopped reading fiction&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/stopped_reading_fiction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/stopped_reading_fiction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philip Roth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/06/28/stopped_reading_fiction</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A literary icon, like many older readers, has turned away from made-up stories. Why?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A remark Philip Roth made in the Financial Times over the weekend has provoked much comment: "I've stopped reading fiction," the 78-year-old author of "Portnoy's Complaint" and dozens of other novels said. Roth isn't alone; over the years, such writers as Cormac McCarthy, Will Self and William Gibson have made similar statements.</p><p>Some people don't like fiction and never have. That's quite different from having once read fiction avidly and then, in the fullness of time, giving it up. To judge informally (that is, according to what people tell me when they learn I'm a book reviewer), the latter is far from an uncommon experience. Many former devourers of novels haven't stopped reading, they've just come, like Roth, to prefer nonfiction books on history, science or politics.</p><p>Roth, when pressed by his interlocutor, didn't offer much of a reason for the change in his tastes: "I don't know. I wised up ..." he said rather enigmatically. It may be that he's determined that reading other people's novels impairs his ability to write his own. Most writers know what it's like to fall under the sway of a master's voice and to wind up unwillingly imitating it. Self told an interviewer that he couldn't enjoy other authors' fiction because "It uses the same muscles that I use to write with." Still, it's improbable that a writer with a voice as established as Roth would have this problem.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/stopped_reading_fiction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/28/stopped_reading_fiction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When bad people write great books</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/bad_people_great_books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/bad_people_great_books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/06/07/bad_people_great_books</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A reader wonders if she really wants to know the dark side of her favorite author]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A reader, prompted by last week's commentary on whether great books can make you a better person, wrote in to ask a related question. Her favorite author is Charles Dickens; his books have been beacons for her. While she'd like to know more about him, she recalls reading long ago that Dickens behaved badly in his personal life. Should she investigate further, even though she worries that this will lead her to "doubt the impression I always had of Dickens: that he was a kind, sensitive soul who had suffered as a child"?</p><p>As if hell-bent on providing further illustration of this dilemma, Nobel laureate V.S. Naipaul played the provocateur last week by announcing that he is a better writer than any woman who has ever lived. He offered a variety of reasons for this state of affairs, none of them worth repeating. While his remarks lacked intellectual content, his antics did inspire some thoughtful responses, many of which have pointed out that talented artists can be reprehensible people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/bad_people_great_books/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/07/bad_people_great_books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does reading great books make you a better person?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/jane_austen_education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/jane_austen_education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Austen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/05/31/jane_austen_education</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A critic says Jane Austen taught him to be a more decent man, but the world is full of well-read jerks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing a favorite critic expound at length on a favorite author is an undersung form of literary pleasure -- as close as you can get to reading two great writers at the same time. William Deresiewicz's <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/ISBNInquiry.asp?EAN=9781594202889">"A Jane Austen Education: How Six Novels Taught Me About Love, Friendship and the Things That Really Matter"</a> certainly achieves that effect for this particular reader. Like Austen, Deresiewicz is lucid, principled and knows how to think as well as how to feel, without ever sacrificing one to the other. He understands that most of us want more than just an exquisite aesthetic experience from a novel. His reviews are gratifying even when you feel inclined to quarrel with them, and (unlike a surprising number of esteemed critics) he has a sense of humor.</p><p>But I am going to quarrel, just a little, and not because "A Jane Austen Education" isn't a delightful and enlightening book. It is both of those things. Furthermore, Austen's reputation is sinking, quicksand-style, into that of a purveyor of romantic wish-fulfillment and empire-waist nostalgia; Deresiewicz offers it a gallant hand up. His book is a reminder of why she has long been regarded as among the greatest novelists of the English language, even by those who do not swoon for Colin Firth. The legendary prime minister Benjamin Disraeli (a man of the world if there ever was one), when asked if he found the time to read novels, replied that indeed he did: "All six of them, every year."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/jane_austen_education/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/jane_austen_education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advice to writers: Skip the scenery</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/description/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/description/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Reader's Advice to Writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/03/01/description</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too much description of landscape and weather has ruined more than one literary novel]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently, I was asked to speak to a class of writing students on what critics look for in debut novels. After canvassing my colleagues, I had a few answers -- a distinctive voice, an interesting perspective, strong writing and so on -- but they didn't seem especially helpful. Presumably, every writer already starts out with the most distinctive voice and interesting perspective he or she can conjure. How about telling them what to avoid instead?</p><p>By far the most common gripe from readers was too much description, particularly environmental description -- that is, of landscape, weather and interiors. This complaint struck me as especially pertinent because at that very moment I was trying to decide whether or not to recommend Tea Obreht's <a href="http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/ISBNInquiry.asp?EAN=%209780385343831">"The Tiger's Wife"</a> in our weekly book column, What to Read. Obreht, recently named one of the New Yorker's 20 best writers under 40, is undeniably talented, and the novel has much to recommend it. Yet no sooner does Obreht's narrative work up a little momentum or present a masterful scene than it hits a patch of long, dozy paragraphs filled with way too much detail about the scenery.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/description/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/01/description/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Literature&#8217;s gender gap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/women_literary_publishing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/women_literary_publishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women writers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writers and Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/02/09/women_literary_publishing</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women are underrepresented in literary publishing because men aren't interested in what they have to say]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the website for Vida, an organization for "women in literary arts," published the results of a survey of 14 literary publications, American and British, ranging from the venerable New York Review of Books to such relative newcomers as Tin House magazine. They counted up the percentage of female contributors, female book reviewers and, finally, reviews of books by women. The results were dispiriting. Poetry magazine came the closest to parity, with its reviewers divided almost evenly and books by women constituting a slight majority of those reviewed (even if men still made up the majority of contributors overall). The New Republic and the New York Review of Books made the worst showings.</p><p>Someone runs a tally like this every decade or so, inevitably revealing that little has changed. The situation is distressing, yet mysteriously intractable; after the third or fourth iteration, there doesn't seem to be much new to say about it. This time around, however, three women on staff at the New Republic decided to dig a little deeper. A common response to the complaint that few books by women are reviewed in major literary publications is to ask whether fewer books by women are published in the first place. As Ruth Franklin reports, this does seem to be the case.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/women_literary_publishing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/09/women_literary_publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hideous fonts may boost reading comprehension</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/19/hideous_fonts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/19/hideous_fonts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Typography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/01/18/hideous_fonts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comic Sans, Papyrus and other unattractive options could win the last laugh in the typeface wars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the subject of fonts (or, typefaces, to use the more technically accurate term), feelings often run high. People have their favorites, for reasons both practical and sentimental. The story of how Helvetica became the preeminent typeface of our times has inspired a documentary film, while loathing of Comic Sans has prompted what can only be called a typographical jihad. A surprising number of older authors name Courier as the font they prefer to write in because it resembles the characters of a typewriter and therefore kindly suggests that the current draft is still available for improvement. But surely everyone can agree that a good typeface is easy to read, right?</p><p>Not so. A recent study out of Princeton, and brought to wider attention by Jonah Lehrer at Wired.com, suggests that ugly, irregular fonts can boost the amount of information readers retain from a text, while easy-to-read type is more likely to just sort of slide out of their minds. The study, titled "Fortune Favors the <strong>Bold</strong> <em>(and the Italicized):</em> Effects of Disfluency on Educational Outcomes," found that people remembered more from worksheets and PowerPoint presentations when they were composed in a hot mess of hated fonts like Monotype Corsiva, Haettenshweiler and the dreaded Comic Sans Italic.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/19/hideous_fonts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/19/hideous_fonts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Be a better reader in 2011</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/05/reading_challenges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/05/reading_challenges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2011 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2011/01/05/reading_challenges</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Choose a book outside your comfort zone and accept a reading challenge in the new year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year around this time, I suggested that Salon readers make a resolution to read at least a couple of books they expected to hate in 2010. OK, I confess, the headline was a tad overstated. The point isn't to slog through a novel or biography you find unendurable, gritting your teeth all the way, but to consider the possibility that snap judgments and old prejudices could be keeping you from books you might actually enjoy.</p><p>My own personal resolutions? First, I vowed to read more books about science in 2010. In this I was mostly successful. One title -- Rebecca Skloot's "The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks" -- even wound up on my best-of-the-year list. That book was fairly light sledding, though, given how gracefully Skloot weaves together the story of 20th-century medical research with the lives of one American family, always keeping the human element in play.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/05/reading_challenges/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/05/reading_challenges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High school seniors are worse readers than in 1992</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/18/us_report_card_seniors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/18/us_report_card_seniors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 17:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/11/18/us_report_card_seniors</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only 38 percent of 12th graders classified as at or above the "proficient" level on the Nation's Report Card]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A national education assessment released Thursday shows that high school seniors have made some improvement in reading, but remain below the achievement levels reached nearly two decades ago.</p><p>The National Assessment of Educational Progress, referred to at the Nation's Report Card, tested 52,000 students in reading and 49,000 in math across 1,670 school districts in 2009.</p><p>Students scored an average of 288 out of 500 points in reading comprehension, two points above the 2005 score but still below the 1992 average of 292. Thirty-eight percent of 12th grade students were classified as at or above the "proficient" level, while 74 percent were considered at or above "basic."</p><p>"Today's report suggests that high school seniors' achievement in reading and math isn't rising fast enough to prepare them to succeed in college and careers," U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said.</p><p>Cornelia S. Orr, executive director of the National Assessment Governing Board, which oversees development tests, said she was encouraged by the fact reading scores had gone up in recent years.</p><p>"And we'd like it to get back up to the level it once was," she said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/18/us_report_card_seniors/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/18/us_report_card_seniors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-reader revolt: I&#8217;m leaving youth culture behind</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/02/why_i_wont_buy_ereaders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/02/why_i_wont_buy_ereaders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 15:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet computers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2010/09/02/why_i_wont_buy_ereaders</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At 26, I'm part of a generation raised on gadgets, but actual books are something I just refuse to give up]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the 2 train uptown during the morning commute the other day, I was in my usual state of sleepwalk -- face crammed into a fellow passenger's armpit -- when a young woman standing 3 feet away from me removed an Amazon Kindle from her oversize designer purse and began to read. A surprising wave of disgust overcame me as I stared at the smooth metallic back of the thing, at her manicured fingernails positioned against it, at her face as she read ... whatever it was that she was reading.</p><p>That was part of it, I realized, trying to analyze my own ridiculous, knee-jerk judgment of this stranger. I couldn't see what she was reading, and it bothered me. I couldn't peer in that tiny window onto someone's interior world, or delight in the juxtaposition that a book choice sometimes presents -- when you notice a stuffy, 90-something grandma buried in a trashy romance novel, or a would-be gangsta engrossed in "Love in the Time of Cholera."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/02/why_i_wont_buy_ereaders/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/02/why_i_wont_buy_ereaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>145</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Book owners have smarter kids</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/summer_book_giveaway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/summer_book_giveaway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer reading]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2010/06/02/summer_book_giveaway</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When it comes to your children, the books in your house matter more than your education or income]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was 12 years old, I read most of the plays of George Bernard Shaw. That's not to say that I <em>understood</em> the plays of George Bernard Shaw, or even that I passionately loved them. They just happened to be around the house, in a set of neat little green paperbacks left over from my father's college days. I doubt that puzzling over the mysteries of "Pygmalion" taught me much about the British class system, but it definitely got me into the habit of searching for understanding in the pages of challenging books.</p><p>A study recently published in the journal Research in Social Stratification and Mobility found that just having books around the house (the more, the better) is correlated with how many years of schooling a child will complete. The study (authored by M.D.R. Evans, Jonathan Kelley, Joanna Sikorac and Donald J. Treimand) looked at samples from 27 nations, and according to its abstract, found that growing up in a household with 500 or more books is "as great an advantage as having university-educated rather than unschooled parents, and twice the advantage of having a professional rather than an unskilled father." Children with as few as 25 books in the family household completed on average two more years of schooling than children raised in homes without any books.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/summer_book_giveaway/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/summer_book_giveaway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The iPad is for readers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/ipad_for_readers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/ipad_for_readers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 18:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Readers and Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tablet computers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/laura_miller/2010/04/05/ipad_for_readers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Surprise! The futuristic device provides an ideal sanctuary for the most old-fashioned leisure activity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I confess that when I decided to buy an iPad, I mostly thought of it as an ultra-portable TV that I could also use to surf the Web and occasionally check e-mail. I expected the cornucopia of Netflix Watch Instantly to keep me occupied for quite a while, now that I can finally watch video in bed. (Not only does my laptop get too hot to make this comfortable, but I worry that I'll fall asleep and accidentally kick my hard drive into oblivion.)</p><p>One weekend into owning the thing and I've only managed to watch half an episode of "Black Adder." I have yet to play a single game. What I've mostly been doing on the iPad is reading, because this much-ballyhooed harbinger of the future turns out to be the ideal device for that most old-fashioned of leisure activities.</p><p>One of the very first things I read was an early draft of <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2010/04/05/david_remnick_the_bridge/index.html">Joan Walsh's review of the new Barack Obama biography by David Remnick.</a> While I was eager to see what Joan had to say about the book, I wasn't looking forward to having to read it on my laptop. I've always found it difficult to fully concentrate on longer, in-depth stories on my computer unless I was actually working on them as an editor or writer. In the past, when I've needed to really think hard about a longer text, I've even resorted to that terribly analog (not to mention wasteful) practice of printing it out and carrying it off to my sofa to read in peace.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/ipad_for_readers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/ipad_for_readers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

