<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Reality TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/reality_tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Hamm is right about Kim Kardashian</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/jon_hamm_is_right_about_kim_kardashian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/jon_hamm_is_right_about_kim_kardashian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 20:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Hamm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12673061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Mad Man rails against idiocy and reality TV -- can we get an amen?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don't ever change, Don Draper. In an instantly notorious interview for the U.K. edition of <a href="http://www.elleuk.com/">Elle magazine</a>, World's Greatest Dreamboat and former <a href="http://www.salon.com/2007/11/15/sexiest_man/">Salon Sexiest Man </a>Jon Hamm has dared to admit that the appeal of reality TV stars "doesn't make any sense" to him, and that "Whether it's Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian or whoever, stupidity is certainly celebrated. Being a f***ing idiot is a valuable commodity in this culture because you’re rewarded significantly." And faster than you can pour your third martini, the tabs have been lapping up that money quote as evidence of a celebrity feud.</p><p>Sure enough, the woman who was Mrs. Kris Humphries for 72 days swiftly banged out <a href="http://m.tmi.me/mTmhF">a reasonably articulate response</a> Monday, tweeting that "I respect Jon and I am a firm believer that everyone is entitled to their own opinion and that not everyone takes the same path in life. We're all working hard and we all have to respect one another. Calling someone who runs their own businesses, is a part of a successful TV show, produces, writes, designs, and creates, 'stupid,' is in my opinion careless." She then promptly tweeted four pouty photographs of herself as she publicly mused how blond she ought to go. <em>And ...</em> the prosecution rests, America.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/jon_hamm_is_right_about_kim_kardashian/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/13/jon_hamm_is_right_about_kim_kardashian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why shouldn&#8217;t the Duggars grieve a miscarriage?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/09/why_shouldnt_the_duggars_grieve_a_miscarriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/09/why_shouldnt_the_duggars_grieve_a_miscarriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Duggar Family]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10306168</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the family loses child No. 20, the Internet rises up and casts wrathful judgment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's a quick quiz: If you heard that a couple, as they approached the second trimester of a wished-for pregnancy, learned that the child had no heartbeat, how would you react?</p><p>Would you say, <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/michelle-duggar-miscarries-feel-heart-broke-telling-children-221738891.html">"God is trying to tell you something; maybe you should listen."</a> Would you ponder, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/entertainment/2011/12/michelle-duggar-19-kids-and-counting-star-has-miscarriage/">"It probably just fell out… ick." </a>Would you, when you heard that the family had named the baby and were grieving for it, say, <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20552365,00.html#disqus_thread">"I feel sorry for their kids, not her. She did this to herself."</a>  You likely wouldn't, because I'm guessing you're not some heartless troll. But what if the couple in question were <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/stop_judging_the_duggars/">Jim Bob and Michelle Duggar</a>? The family announced this week that "We discovered during a routine 19-week ultrasound that our 20th child, who was due in April 2012, passed away recently." Oh! Then have at it, Internet!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/09/why_shouldnt_the_duggars_grieve_a_miscarriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/09/why_shouldnt_the_duggars_grieve_a_miscarriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>153</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is reality TV good for girls?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/07/is_reality_tv_good_for_girls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/07/is_reality_tv_good_for_girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girl Scouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jersey Shore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Housewives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10299221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Girl Scouts study confuses "American Idol" with "Real Housewives," but still yields shocking results]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know how to raise girls with healthy self-esteem. Encourage them to be physically active. Set a positive example by showing them you believe in yourself. And let them watch reality TV. Wait, what?</p><p>OK, it's not quite that simple. In surprising-to-no-one news this week, a new study from as reliable source as the <a href="http://www.girlscouts.org/research/pdf/real_to_me_factsheet.pdf">Girl Scout Research Institute</a> found plenty to confirm all your worst fears about girls who define themselves as "regular" reality watchers. After surveying 1,100 girls aged between 11 and 17 nationwide, the Girl Scouts found that compared with their non-reality TV watching peers, reality fans are likelier to agree that gossiping is a normal part of girls' relationships (78 percent vs. 54 percent), that girls are naturally "catty" with each other (68 percent vs. 50 percent) and that it's "hard to trust" girls (63 percent vs. 50 percent).</p><p>Regular reality-TV viewers also report spending a significantly larger amount of time on their appearance and are far likelier to agree with statements like "Being mean earns you more respect than being nice." Apparently, reality fans don't join the Girl Scouts to make friends; they join to <em>win.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/07/is_reality_tv_good_for_girls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/07/is_reality_tv_good_for_girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TV&#8217;s unconscionable spectacle</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/tvs_unconscionable_spectacle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/tvs_unconscionable_spectacle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Real Housewives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10296082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[\"Real Housewives of Beverly Hills\" plays a real-life suicide for melodrama -- and sets a startling new precedent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scariest, most disgusting show on television isn't "American Horror Story." It's "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills."</p><p>Bravo's unscripted series offers that horror movie gimmick of showing you unlikable people doing ill-advised things that you can't prevent no matter how loudly you yell or curse at the screen. But because the characters are -- in the physical sense, at least -- "real," and the world-shattering plot twist at the core of this season was telegraphed to the audience long in advance, what might otherwise seem a guilty pleasure seems instead a travesty, as depraved a spectacle as anything that has ever appeared on American screens.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/tvs_unconscionable_spectacle/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/06/tvs_unconscionable_spectacle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop judging the Duggars</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/stop_judging_the_duggars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/stop_judging_the_duggars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[20 and Counting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Duggar Family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10184402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So what if they're expecting again? A family of 20 is just another side of reproductive choice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our famous families have their specialties. And just as surely as<a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/its_time_to_break_up_with_the_kardashians/"> Kardashians like to get engaged</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/21/why_are_we_still_rubbernecking_lindsay_lohan/singleton/">Lohans get arrested,</a> the Duggars excel in the field of making more Duggars. So that's exactly what they're doing. But as the family gets ready to welcome its 20th member, has America's fertility freak show crossed the line?</p><p>The spectacularly fecund Duggars entered the reality game already way ahead of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/kate_gosselin_unemployment/">the Gosselins</a>, and even left Octomom Nadya Suleman in the dust. They've been a source of weird fascination ever since they welcomed their 15th child on their first television special seven years -- and five pregnancies -- ago. And each time their brood increases, so does the public scorn. Along with occasional good wishes, <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/gossip/2011/11/duggars-pregnant-20th-baby-19-kids-and-counting.html">commenters on the L.A. Times</a> website have been writing things like: "How about you bolt your knees together?" and "Lady, your hooha isn't a clown car!"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/stop_judging_the_duggars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/09/stop_judging_the_duggars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>243</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s time to break up with the Kardashians</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/its_time_to_break_up_with_the_kardashians/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/its_time_to_break_up_with_the_kardashians/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kim Kardashian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kris Humphries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10160198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kim's divorce shows just how far the reality star will go for attention -- and why she deserves our scorn]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does she have to return the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/kim_kardashian_kris_humphries_wedding_registry/">$1,650 coffee pot and Lalique monkeys</a>? More significantly, can America please stop giving a crap about her now? After giving NBA player Kris Humphries the best 72 days of her life, Kim Kardashian filed Monday for divorce. If you want to keep up with the Kardashians, you might want to start by installing a revolving door at the wedding chapel.</p><p>From the start, the whirlwind romance of the reality star and the basketball beefcake seemed to be moving at a reality television-assisted pace. The two met just a year ago, but by May, Kim was flashing a $2 million diamond roughly the size of the meteor that killed off the dinosaurs. What followed was a painstakingly chronicled and dizzyingly brief engagement. Remember July? They seemed so happy then! Remember when she said she was <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/01/kim_kardashian_married_name_change/">going to be Kim Humphries henceforth</a>? Remember the August wedding so opulent, it made Kate Middleton's look like a lunchtime exchange of vows at City Hall? E! aired the now bitterly ironic "Kim's Fairytale Wedding: A Kardashian Event" just three weeks ago.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/its_time_to_break_up_with_the_kardashians/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/its_time_to_break_up_with_the_kardashians/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was a &#8220;Real World&#8221; star raped by her castmates?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/28/was_a_real_world_star_raped_by_her_castmates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/28/was_a_real_world_star_raped_by_her_castmates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real world]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10152777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest reality-TV horror, Tanya Cooley claims producers kept cameras rolling as she was sexually assaulted]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(updated below)</strong></p><p>Tonya Cooley is a former "Real World Chicago" and "Real World/Road Rules Challenge" cast member. She's been a Playboy "Cybergirl of the Week," has worked with the Girls Gone Wild team, and done a little <a href="http://www.realityblurred.com/realitytv/archives/the_real_world_chicago/2007_Feb_13_tonya_cooley_cinemax ">Cinemax softcore</a>. And absolutely none of that means that she wasn't raped.</p><p>Two years after filming her "Real World/Road Rules" season, <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/10/27/real-world-contestant-sues-sexual-abuse-rape-toothbrush-lawsuit-mtv/#.TqqMg1aXTkY ">Cooley has filed suit </a>against MTV, Bunim/Murray Productions, and her former castmates Kenneth Santucci and Evan Starkman, claming that Santucci and Starkman sexually abused her while the show's producers did nothing to intervene. Instead, she alleges, they just kept the cameras rolling. She says her castmates "took another male participant's toothbrush and rubbed the toothbrush around plaintiff's genitals, including rubbing her labia and inserting the toothbrush into plaintiff's vagina." She further alleges that male cast members were goaded to "inappropriately touch female cast members' bodies, including in intimate areas." MTV and "The Real World" and the "Challenge" producers Bunim/Murray have so far not commented on the case.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/28/was_a_real_world_star_raped_by_her_castmates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/28/was_a_real_world_star_raped_by_her_castmates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Patti Stanger hate everyone?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/patti_stanger_too_far/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/patti_stanger_too_far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Millionaire Matchmaker" is known for brashness, but recent comments on gay men, women and Jews went too far]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been a banner week for Patti Stanger, Bravo's vaguely humanoid "Millionaire Matchmaker." In the course of just a few days, she's managed to offend Jews, gay men, straight men and women in general. Though it's hard to predict what she'll do next, I'd advise Dominicans and the blind to brace themselves.</p><p>Stanger revved up last week by telling the hosts of "New York Live" that our metropolitan women "are smart in business and dumb in love," whereas Los Angeles women are "dumb in business and smart in love." She then added, in a coup de grace that makes asses of both sexes, that "[Men] like [smart women] after marriage. They don't like them before they are married. <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/entertainment/2011/09/patti-stanger-criticizes-smart-single-women-jews-gays">You got to dumb it down</a> a little because men are not that bright." To recap: Women are dumb and men are dumb, just in different ways.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/patti_stanger_too_far/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/27/patti_stanger_too_far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kate Gosselin is &#8220;freaked&#8221; about unemployment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/kate_gosselin_unemployment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/kate_gosselin_unemployment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/09/07/kate_gosselin_unemployment</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reality star loses her show -- and America is somehow unmoved by her plight]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A harrowing number of Americans have lost their jobs this year. Eight of the latest are under the age of 11. And with the cancellation of "Kate Plus Eight," reality TV matriarch Kate Gosselin has admitted to People magazine that she's <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20526134,00.html">"freaking out big time"</a> about her family's future.</p><p>For six years now, the Gosselin family has been part of the television landscape -- first via a series of Discovery specials, then through the often tumultuous, Ed Hardy-festooned "Jon &amp; Kate Plus Eight" years, and then, finally, in the shark-jumping post-divorce era of Kate's solo parenting. For the past two years, the show has limped along; like "Laverne &amp; Shirley" after Shirley skipped town, however, the magic was gone. More significantly, just as the Gosselins have grown and changed with time, America is likewise no longer the big brood and multiple births-obsessed land it was back in the mid-2000s. Now, if you're not a <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/2011/01/06/tlc_mental_illness_network">hoarder or a freaky eater</a>, good luck getting -- or staying -- on TV.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/kate_gosselin_unemployment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/07/kate_gosselin_unemployment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could a bizarre Dutch game show help refugees?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/dutch_refugee_reality_tv_show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/dutch_refugee_reality_tv_show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 18:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/09/06/dutch_refugee_reality_tv_show</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reality TV program pits rejected asylum seekers against each other. Its shock tactics could be effective]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BRUSSELS, Belgium -- The latest sensation on Dutch TV is a quiz show featuring five young refugees who compete to prove their attachment to the Netherlands by answering questions about tulips and bikes, identifying corny local pop tunes and carving an outline of the country's map from a slice of Gouda cheese.</p><p>The winner gets a plastic suitcase containing 4,000 euros ($5,680) to take with them when they are expelled.</p><p>All five have already had their asylum requests rejected, and face an uncertain future when they are deported to countries they barely remember.</p><p>Broadcast across the nation last Thursday, the show may sound like a scene from a surreal black comedy, but "Weg van Nederlands" (it can translate as either "Away from the Netherlands" or "Crazy about the Netherlands") was for real.</p><p>The contestants are students who fled their homelands as children and grew up in the Netherlands. Now, though, their adopted nation has tightened its asylum policies, and their time is up.</p><p>With its ever-smiling presenter, flanked by a pair of gyrating blondes in sexed-up police uniforms with mini-skirts and plunging necklines, the show makes disturbing viewing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/dutch_refugee_reality_tv_show/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/dutch_refugee_reality_tv_show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Real Housewives&#8221; to world: The show must go on</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/real_housewives_season_2_premiere/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/real_housewives_season_2_premiere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2011 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/09/06/real_housewives_season_2_premiere</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Beverly Hills" season premiere barely acknowledges castmember Russell Armstrong's suicide]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" shocked viewers last night by setting aside its ongoing story line and delving into the suicide of cast member Russell Armstrong headfirst. The second season premiere was a wide-ranging, commercial-free hour that spoke frankly of the tragedy's effect on the cast and crew, the behind-the-scenes reaction, and the ethical questions raised in its aftermath.</p><p>Just kidding. They barely talked about it at all. Seriously, what did you expect?</p><p>The episode started with the housewives convening at the home of cast members Paul and Adrienne Maloof. "I don't think any of us saw any sign of this [coming], and that's why it's such a shock," Adrienne Maloof said to the group, which conspicuously did not include Russell Armstrong's widow, Taylor. "We don't know what state of mind a person's in to get to that point," said Kyle Richards.</p><p>The sequence was brief and muted, no doubt because the discussion was, too; given reality TV's tendency to tease out and highlight every tiny glimmer of emotion as if it were a frame from the Zapruder film, it seems inconceivable that a lot of big moments got cut out.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/real_housewives_season_2_premiere/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/06/real_housewives_season_2_premiere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should reality TV adopt a code of ethics?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/01/reality_tv_code_of_ethics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/01/reality_tv_code_of_ethics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/09/01/reality_tv_code_of_ethics</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the wake of the "Real Housewives" suicide, a blogger urges producers to abide by a humane code of conduct]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's dream for a minute, shall we?</p><p>National Public Radio blogger Linda Holmes <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/monkeysee/2011/08/31/140082930/ethical-reality-a-proposed-code-for-producers-to-live-by?ft=1&amp;f=1008">published a thoughtful piece yesterday</a> proposing a code of ethics that would govern the production of so-called reality TV series. It's sensible and humane. And in a universe where sensible, humane people produced shows like "The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" -- <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20518584,00.html">which lost stressed-out cast member Russell Armstrong to suicide last month</a> -- it would be adopted industry-wide in a heartbeat.</p><p>"It would be more expensive [to implement such a code] and it would close a few doors," Holmes writes, "and yes, some potential for exploitation drama would be sacrificed. But it would also prevent the baby of a perfectly good game show or documentary show from being thrown out with the bathwater of 'The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills.'"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/01/reality_tv_code_of_ethics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/01/reality_tv_code_of_ethics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality shows we&#8217;d like to see</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/01/unreal_reality_shows/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/01/unreal_reality_shows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/2011/09/01/unreal_reality_shows</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are some straightforward concepts to revitalize the disgraced genre -- from "Not Oprah" to "Tree"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <strong>&#8220;Pitch&#8221;</strong>
  </p><p>Critics carp that by the time reality TV finally finds its way to TV, it&#8217;s been scrubbed clean of most of its reality. &#8220;Pitch&#8221; attempts to reverse all that. It&#8217;s a single-camera show that brings viewers inside the pitch meetings for other reality shows. Watch as up-and-coming and/or washed-up celebrities make the case that their lives deserve to be on television. Marvel as executives spin out possible plot scenarios for allegedly unscripted shows. Wince as network veterans who were involved in quality sitcoms (and, in some cases, educational television) look queasy as independent production companies try to convince them of the merits of a half-hour show about Selena Gomez&#8217;s driver. If &#8220;Pitch&#8221; succeeds, there is a spin-off already prepared: &#8220;Pitch Pitch,&#8221; which examines the process that led to the airing of &#8220;Pitch.&#8221;</p><p>
    <strong>&#8220;&#172;Oprah&#8221;</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/01/unreal_reality_shows/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/01/unreal_reality_shows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The triumph of Jamie Oliver&#8217;s &#8220;nemesis&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/jamie_oliver_gilt_piece/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/jamie_oliver_gilt_piece/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/food/feature/2011/08/31/jamie_oliver_gilt_piece</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The culinary crusader barged into West Virginia for a reality show. Now his on-screen rival is making her own magic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was all I could do not to scarf the entire stromboli, neatly packaged for me in a Styrofoam clamshell, while in the car. The dough was soft. The balance of ham and mozzarella, just right. And so, only about half was left when I parked on Third Avenue, the main drag in Huntington, West Virginia, and offered a bite to some friends.</p><p>"Wow. That's great," said one.</p><p>"Yeah, where'd you get that?" asked another.</p><p>"You'll never believe it," I told them. "This is school lunch."</p><p>
    <a href="http://www.gilttaste.com"><br />
      <img class='wp-image-10008096' src='http://media.salon.com/2011/08/ID_giltTaste.gif' /><br />
    </a>
  </p><p>Times have changed since celebrity chef Jamie Oliver broadcast startling and deliberately inflammatory&#8212;this was reality TV, after all&#8212; images of kids here dumping trays of fresh food untouched into the trash. For those of you who missed, Oliver's prime-time program, "Food Revolution," the British chef arrived in Huntington in 2009 after it was named the most unhealthy metropolitan area in America and went to work ousting greasy burgers and pizza in favor of from-scratch meals made with fresh ingredients. Two years later, on the first week of school, which began in mid-August, students in Cabell County sat down to meals of from-scratch chicken quesadillas and brown rice and, on the day I visited, creamy chicken and noodles served with freshly made coleslaw, steamed broccoli with parmesan, an orange and hot rolls, the smell of which floated enticingly through the halls.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/jamie_oliver_gilt_piece/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/31/jamie_oliver_gilt_piece/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even suicide won&#8217;t give reality TV a conscience</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/real_housewives_special/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/real_housewives_special/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/2011/08/30/real_housewives_special</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Real Housewives" cast gathers for a "very special" -- and likely very cynical -- tribute to Russell Armstrong]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The beauty of reality TV is that it can absorb anything. No matter what happens to the casts of these programs on- or off-camera -- even a horrific event such as a suicide -- can be folded into the narrative, and the producers can turn it into part of the show, or even a very special episode.</p><p>Sure enough, the cast and crew of "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" convened yesterday to tape a special reacting to <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/08/16/real-housewives-russell-armstrong-dead-dies-suicide-dies-hang-taylor-armstrong/#.Tlzpo3MmtPg">the death of series regular Russell Armstrong</a>, wife of series regular Taylor Armstrong, who killed himself earlier this month.</p><p><a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/showtracker/2011/08/bravo-to-address-real-housewives-of-beverly-hills-death-in-special.html">The Los Angeles Times</a> broke the story yesterday, quoting "sources close to production."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/real_housewives_special/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/real_housewives_special/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reality TV: A blood sport that must change</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/reality_tv_blood_sport/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/reality_tv_blood_sport/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 14:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/18/reality_tv_blood_sport</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The suicide of a "Real Housewives" husband cracks the glossy veneer of a ruthless franchise]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell Armstrong died in an arena.</p><p>The type of so-called reality show represented by the "Real Housewives" franchise is the soft-bellied, 21st century American TV version of a gladiatorial contest. It has no agenda except giving viewers the basest sort of entertainment: the spectacle of people doing violence to each other and suffering violence themselves. Instead of going at each other like gladiators with swords and clubs, or like boxers hurling punches, participants in this kind of unscripted show attack each other psychologically. The show's appeal is the spectacle of emotional violence. The participants -- or "cast members," as they are revealingly labeled -- suffer and bleed emotionally while we watch and guffaw.</p><p>It's time to get real about reality TV.&#160; As your parents may have warned you, it's all fun and games until someone gets hurt. People are getting hurt.</p><p>Armstrong, the estranged husband of "The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" star Taylor Armstrong, commited suicide on Monday. Friends have said the show changed him, that the pressure of having his marital strains examined on national TV and the financial stress of keeping up with much wealthier cast members all contributed to his emotional collapse.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/reality_tv_blood_sport/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/reality_tv_blood_sport/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did &#8220;Real Housewives&#8221; kill Russell Armstrong?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/real_housewives_russell_armstrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/real_housewives_russell_armstrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Real Housewives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/17/real_housewives_russell_armstrong</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Armstrong's friends say the reality show changed him. Does Bravo -- and the TV audience -- have blood on its hands?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell Armstrong, the estranged husband of "Real Housewives of Beverly Hills" star Taylor Armstrong, committed suicide on Tuesday, and many articles about his death pointed some of the blame at the popular Bravo reality franchise.</p><p>In the <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/news/la-et-russell-armstrong-20110817,0,3391963.story">Los Angeles Times</a> this morning, Armstrong's friend William Ratner said that the show "was [Russell's] downfall. The TV show put a lot of pressure on him to produce financially. You're on a show with a couple like the Maloofs, who are verifiable billionaires, and you're not," said William Ratner. ("Housewife" Adrienne Maloof's family owns the Sacramento Kings and the Palms casino in Las Vegas.)</p><p>Armstrong's lawyer, Ronald Richards, speaking to ABC, noted that: "These couples join these shows, and then they keep trying to outdo each other and they end up spending all their money trying to sustain a lifestyle that's unrealistic and wasn't there prior to the show," said Richards. "The weekly social events, the dinners and all the BS, trying to pretend you have unlimited resources in Beverly Hills is tough."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/real_housewives_russell_armstrong/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/real_housewives_russell_armstrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five pop culture items we missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/11/pop_five_world_war_z_brad_pitt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/11/pop_five_world_war_z_brad_pitt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2011 22:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/11/pop_five_world_war_z_brad_pitt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's catch: Brad Pitt ruins "World War Z," Roseanne wants another TV show, and Ryan Gosling nurses a baby]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1. Dog-eat-dog journalism of the day:</strong> The Wall Street Journal's piece about <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904140604576498772934028728.html">puppy interviews for prestigious doggy daycares</a> make those trend pieces about hyper-vigilant New York prep school moms look almost sane by comparison.</p><p><strong>2. Brain-dead zombie film of the day:</strong> "World War Z" is a great book about the oral history of the zombie invasions, but it looks like the film adaptation <a href="http://www.movies.com/movie-news/world-war-z-movie/3869">is just going to be a vehicle for Brad Pitt to act like Jason Bourne</a> (if Bourne fought zombies). Now we know why Ed Harris and Matthew Fox <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/06/world_war_z_matthew_fox_ed_har.html">dropped out</a>.</p><p><strong>3. Foreign exchange program of the day:</strong> Tara Reid and Pam Anderson will be going to London for <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/10/tara-reid-joins-big-broth_n_923324.html">"Celebrity Big Brother."</a> That actually works out quite well for us, as long as you don't send over that <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/10/sarah_burge_breast_surgery_child">Barbie Mom</a> or Duchess Fergie in return.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/11/pop_five_world_war_z_brad_pitt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/11/pop_five_world_war_z_brad_pitt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pop Torn: 10 pieces of cultural ambivalence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/06/pop_torn_nicki_minaj_mister_rogers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/06/pop_torn_nicki_minaj_mister_rogers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Franco]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Torn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rise of the Planet of the Apes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/06/pop_torn_nicki_minaj_mister_rogers</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week we're on the fence about: Mister Rogers spin-offs, more Sarah Palin TV and terrible John Wayne analogies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TGIAugust, am I right guys? I cannot wait for summer to be over and for it to be cold again, because you know what they make children say in the Pledge of Allegiance: "Winter is coming." While we're still dealing with the warm weather, though, how about a roundup of all the cultural news that makes you feel like you just don't know <em>what</em> to feel anymore?</p><p><strong>1. Jesse Eisenberg in Dostoyevsky adaptation:</strong> It sounds crazy, but making "The Double" into a movie might actually be a good idea. <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/08/jesse_eisenberg_cast_in_adapta.html">Very Charlie Kaufmanesque</a>. Maybe Michael Cera can play his doppleganger?</p><p><strong>2. Connor Ratliff is old enough to be president</strong>: Well, I'm sold on <a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/best-presidential-ad-ever-candidate-announces-campaign-on-the-simplest-of-all-platforms/">this guy's campaign</a>. If only the rest of politics were this easy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/06/pop_torn_nicki_minaj_mister_rogers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/06/pop_torn_nicki_minaj_mister_rogers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When &#8220;celebrities&#8221; sue cartoons</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/02/celebrities_who_sue_cartoons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/02/celebrities_who_sue_cartoons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2011 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entourage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/02/celebrities_who_sue_cartoons</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a reality show star threatens "Entourage" for using his likeness, we look back at some animated precedents]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you keeping score at home, this season of "Entourage" has the perpetually semi-employed Johnny Drama <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/07/31/entourage_recap_episode_2">voicing an animated series called "Johnny Bananas" alongside Andrew Dice Clay.</a> "Johnny Bananas" is a crazy world, full of monkeys, orangutans, and gorillas -- all of whom sound like they just walked off of a shoot for a "Goodfellas" parody. (Why would anyone be making a "Goodfellas" parody in 2011? I have no idea. Andrew Dice Clay is on "Entourage" though, so perhaps the year doesn't matter!)</p><p>There's only one problem: a former MTV reality star<strong>*</strong> has already claimed the name Johnny Bananas, and <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/08/01/johnny-bananas-entourage-mtv-star-johnny-devenanzio-hbo-johnny-drama/">he's gearing up to sue "Entourage" for using his likeness for their imaginary monkey show</a>. Does he have grounds to take this all the way to monkey court? Let's take a look.</p><p>Johnny Bananas, aka John Devenanzio, starred in "The Real World" in 2006 (and later on "The Challenge," formerly known as "Road Rules/Real World Challenge") and talks with a thick Brooklyn/Boston accent, just like Drama and Dice.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/02/celebrities_who_sue_cartoons/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/02/celebrities_who_sue_cartoons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

