<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Red Riding Hood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/red_riding_hood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 00:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Red Riding Hood&#8221;: The &#8220;Showgirls&#8221; of fairy-tale movies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/red_riding_hood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/red_riding_hood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Riding Hood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2011/03/10/red_riding_hood</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Catherine Hardwicke's loopy, sexy, 90210-style "Red Riding Hood" is a curious attack on the "Twilight" franchise]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Warner Bros. has kept <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/twilight/index.html">"Twilight"</a> director Catherine Hardwicke's new film of <a href="http://redridinghood.warnerbros.com/">"Red Riding Hood"</a> tightly under wraps until this week, and now that I've seen it, I can understand why. It's not quite because "Red Riding Hood" is a monumental disaster, although I'm sure some reviews will make it sound that way. It's more that it's strange and stupid and half-compelling and sometimes beautiful, with its big, bad talking wolf and Amanda Seyfried's big, blue, startled eyes and a Christmas-card medieval village inhabited by escapees from a mid-'90s prime-time soap. I can imagine people liking "Red Riding Hood" -- indeed, some people will love it, in that highly contemporary half-ironic spirit -- but its WTF factor is off the charts, beginning with Hardwicke's all-too-obvious attempt to avenge herself upon the "Twilight" franchise.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/red_riding_hood/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/red_riding_hood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
