<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Reince Priebus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/reince_priebus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RNC Chair: GOP has been &#8220;lousy&#8221; at outreach to Latinos</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/rnc_chair_gop_has_been_lousy_at_outreach_to_latinos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/rnc_chair_gop_has_been_lousy_at_outreach_to_latinos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13346552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["But that’s going to change," promised Reince Priebus ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RNC Chair Reince Priebus acknowledged that Republicans have been "lousy" at reaching out to Latino voters, telling a group of Latino elected officials that that's "going to change."</p><p>“I’ll be honest here. In the past two years, we’ve done a pretty lousy job of connecting in the Latino community," Priebus said, speaking at an event in Chicago for the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials, the <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/clout/chi-rnc-chairman-priebus-says-gop-does-lousy-job-reaching-out-to-latinos-20130629,0,6858340.story">Chicago Tribune</a> reports. "We’ve missed out on opportunities to build better relationships. But that’s going to change."</p><p>“I didn’t come here to convert you,” he added. “I hope that it’s clear that we want to earn your trust and your vote.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/rnc_chair_gop_has_been_lousy_at_outreach_to_latinos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/rnc_chair_gop_has_been_lousy_at_outreach_to_latinos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh: No one willing to impeach the first black president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush announced on Monday that Obama is not in "any jeopardy" of impeachment -- but only because he is black ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh announced on Monday that President Obama won't be <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/impeach_obama_again/" target="_blank">impeached</a> over recent controversies and that "Benghazi is not going to touch" him. And no, it's not because the talking points "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/two_scandals_deflated_one_persists/" target="_blank">scandal</a>" wasn't really, you know, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/two_scandals_deflated_one_persists/" target="_blank">scandalous</a>, or that the Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus told impeachment-happy members of Congress to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/" target="_blank">cool it until they have evidence</a> to support their claims or any other reasons that are based in reality.</p><p>It's because Obama is black, and "the American people are not going to tolerate the first black president being removed from office," according to Limbaugh.</p><p><iframe src="http://mediamatters.org/embed/194156" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="480" height="360"></iframe></p><p>h/t <a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/05/20/limbaugh-obama-wont-be-removed-from-office-beca/194156" target="_blank">Media Matters</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC Chair: Don&#8217;t call for impeachment without evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reince Priebus chided members of the Republican party who have called for Obama's impeachment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RNC Chair Reince Priebus warned members of the Republican party to be cautious when calling for President Obama's impeachment over the Benghazi and IRS scandals, "until you have evidence."</p><p>“We have to be persistent but patient,” Priebus told <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/behind-the-curtain-why-the-gop-thinks-it-could-blow-it-91528.html?hp=t1">Politico</a>. “I think where there’s smoke, there’s fire. If we present ourselves to the American people as intelligent, we’re going to be in a great place as far as showing that this administration is not transparent, is obsessed with power and hates dissent. But you don’t call for impeachment until you have evidence.”</p><p>Republicans like Sen. Jim Inhofe, Okla., and Rep. Jason Chaffetz, Utah, have <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/house_goper_obama_could_be_impeached_over_benghazi/">argued</a> that the President could be impeached over the State Department's handling of the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Libya — not to mention the slew of Republicans who have <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/please_stop_comparing_things_to_watergate/">invoked</a> Watergate when discussing the IRS scandal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I quit the Republican Party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/why_i_quit_the_republican_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/why_i_quit_the_republican_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Latino vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puerto Rico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once called the future of the GOP, Latino outreach director Pablo Pantoja tells Salon how intolerance made him bolt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A year ago, Pablo Pantoja was the future of the Republican Party, courting fellow Latinos for the conservative cause and stumping across Florida <a href="http://www.sunshinestatesarah.com/2012/01/how-this-right-wing-nut-came-to-vote.html">with Ann Romney’s brother</a>. "Hispanics in the area are going to realize the Republican Party is where they belong,” the <a href="http://pablopantoja.com">Puerto Rico-born Iraq vet</a> told the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/28/us/politics/floridas-crucial-hispanic-voters-are-wary-of-romney.html">in April 2012</a>, just a week after being named the Republican National Committee’s Latino outreach director in the electorally all-important Sunshine State. "We are going to engage Hispanics and Latinos like we've never done before," Reince Priebus had told reporters that month <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/04/16/gop_targets_hispanic_voters_in_swing_states.html">in a conference call</a> introducing Pantoja and his counterparts in five other battleground states. (On Election Night, Mitt Romney lost all of those states except for one, North Carolina.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/why_i_quit_the_republican_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/why_i_quit_the_republican_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC asks SCOTUS to strike down contribution limits</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/rnc_asks_scotus_to_strike_down_contribution_limits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/rnc_asks_scotus_to_strike_down_contribution_limits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super PACs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican National Committee argued that certain limits on campaign contributions violate the First Amendment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican National Committee filed a brief asking the Supreme Court to strike down certain limits on campaign contributions, because they violate the First Amendment.</p><p><a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/fundraising/298307-rnc-urges-supreme-court-to-strike-campaign-finance-limits">The Hill</a> reports that the RNC is challenging how much an individual can donate in the course of a two-year election cycle:</p><blockquote><p>Individual donors cannot donate more than $74,600 to political committees, such as the RNC, in a two-year period. Contributions to individual candidates are capped at $48,600, meaning one donor could only give the maximum donation to nine candidates per cycle.</p> <p>The RNC said in its brief that the court should strike down aggregate limits because they infringe on donors' First Amendment rights but don't serve an appropriate and “narrowly tailored” government interest.</p></blockquote><p>The Court is scheduled to take up campaign finance limits in its next term, which starts in October.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/rnc_asks_scotus_to_strike_down_contribution_limits/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/rnc_asks_scotus_to_strike_down_contribution_limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The week in 10 pics</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/the_week_in_10_pics_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/the_week_in_10_pics_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The week in 10 pics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Korea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyberattack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsay Lohan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steubenville]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From March Madness to Michele Bachmann's craziness, a look at the images that defined the week]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[From March Madness to Michele Bachmann's craziness, a look at the images that defined the week]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/the_week_in_10_pics_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans love poor people now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/republicans_%e2%9d%a4_welfare_queens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/republicans_%e2%9d%a4_welfare_queens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The party that forever demonized struggling Americans now realizes it needs them, in order to survive. Oops]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's safe to say that the Republican Party's recent decision to “<a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/130999130/RNC-Growth-Opportunity-Book-2013">relaunch</a>” itself and suddenly <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/bensmith/compassionate-conservatism-is-back">reach out to poor people</a> is motivated more by a naked desire to win votes, than by some Gandhi-like benevolence. If the party's policy platforms -- highlighted by an Edward Scissorhands-like budget that slices <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/03/21/house-ryan-budget-balance-medicare/2005613/">programs for the indigent</a> -- weren't a dead giveaway, the RNC's new ballyhooed <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/130999130/RNC-Growth-Opportunity-Book-2013">strategy plan</a> comes right out and says it.</p><p>And yet, despite its dubious origins, the party's new approach is a striking statement regarding the political power — and numbers — of lower-income people in this country: Rather than dismiss, slur or divide poorer Americans (as in prior elections), Republicans have now made the political calculation that they've no choice but to talk directly to them and win their votes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/republicans_%e2%9d%a4_welfare_queens/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/23/republicans_%e2%9d%a4_welfare_queens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Roger Ailes the GOP&#8217;s worst enemy?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/gop_rebranding_doesnt_apply_to_roger_ailes_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/gop_rebranding_doesnt_apply_to_roger_ailes_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ailes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Growth & Opportunity Project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the party's rebranding efforts, Fox News seemingly has no interest in moderating its attack programming]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question for Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus, who this week unveiled a nearly 100-page "autopsy" <a href="http://growthopp.gop.com/RNC_Growth_Opportunity_Book_2013.pdf">report</a> on the GOP's recent electoral failings that urged the party to soften its image and become more inclusive: Do you think Roger Ailes is more concerned with his new biography hitting the top ten on the best-seller list, or with the Republican Party successfully appealing to more minority voters?</p><p>The answer to that question might go a long way in determining whether the GOP has any luck rebranding itself in the coming years. Early indications are Ailes and Fox News have no interest in moderating their form of attack programming, the bare-knuckle brand celebrated in Zev Chafets' new bio of the Fox News president,  <em>Roger Ailes: Off Camera</em>.</p><p>Dubbed the "Growth &amp; Opportunity Project," the RNC's laundry list of campaign failures urges the party to become more inclusive, tolerant and able to engage and persuade non-believers. Or to at least be able to not turn them off entirely with angry, absolutist rhetoric. "On messaging, we must change our tone," the report concluded.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/gop_rebranding_doesnt_apply_to_roger_ailes_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/22/gop_rebranding_doesnt_apply_to_roger_ailes_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reince Priebus begins his walk-back</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/reince_priebus_begins_his_walk_back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/reince_priebus_begins_his_walk_back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13247040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He wants the GOP to appear welcoming to gays -- as long as they don’t demand equal rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I gave Reince Priebus and his minions too much credit the other day. His “autopsy” of the Republican Party’s disastrous 2012 election cycle mostly involved vague and frothy messaging advice, but I suggested that it might herald a different attitude toward gay rights.</p><p>Not so fast. Priebus is now reassuring religious conservatives that he doesn’t think the party should change its policies or principles to attract gay voters. “I know what our principles are, I know our party believes marriage is between one man and one woman,” Priebus told MSNBC’s Luke Russert on Wednesday. “But I also know our party’s going to be inclusive, and it’s going to listen to people and it’s going to allow for differences in our party.”</p><p>Priebus got into hot water with the religious right not so much for the report’s language about gay voters – it merely recommended “outreach,” while fretting that the party’s anti-gay stance was alienating young voters. It was his decision, in his press conference, to praise Sen. Rob Portman for coming out for gay marriage (while revealing that his son is gay) that caused him trouble.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/reince_priebus_begins_his_walk_back/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/20/reince_priebus_begins_his_walk_back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social conservatives slam RNC for supporting Rob Portman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/social_conservatives_slam_rnc_for_supporting_rob_portman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/social_conservatives_slam_rnc_for_supporting_rob_portman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Portman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phyllis Schlafly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC shouldn't be "pandering idiots," they said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social conservatives told the RNC not to be "pandering idiots," after Chairman Reince Priebus stood by Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, who over the weekend came out in support of same-sex marriage.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/343311/social-conservatives-rnc-don-t-be-pandering-idiots-betsy-woodruff">National Review Online</a>:</p><blockquote><p>“I think [the RNC] should pretty much ignore him,” says Phyllis Schlafly, a longtime conservative activist, in an interview with National Review Online. “I think he has made a mistake, and he probably won’t get reelected.”</p> <p>Ralph Reed, the founder of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, says the party has to be careful. “If the Republican party tries to retreat from being a pro-marriage, pro-family party, the big tent is going to become a pup tent very fast,” he says. “I am concerned that some in the party are going wobbly on this issue.”</p></blockquote><p>Brian Brown, of the National Organization for Marriage, told NRO that Portman will now likely get a challenger in the primary. “This is a critical issue, and to act like it’s just no big deal is just wrong."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/social_conservatives_slam_rnc_for_supporting_rob_portman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/social_conservatives_slam_rnc_for_supporting_rob_portman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP “autopsy” dismembers the party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/gop_%e2%80%9cautopsy%e2%80%9d_dismembers_the_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/gop_%e2%80%9cautopsy%e2%80%9d_dismembers_the_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 18:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Priebus is right about his party's terminal illness, but he'll have to fight Palin and Limbaugh to save it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s a little weird to call an inquiry into the troubles of a living entity an “autopsy” – they’re normally performed on the dead -- but that’s what Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus labeled <a href="http://growthopp.gop.com/default.aspx">his four-month examination of his party’s 2012 defeat.</a> It turns out he believes in truth in labeling.</p><p>Priebus’s thorough-going investigation and its 200 pages of recommendations leave the modern GOP dismembered, its diseased vital organs cut out, their toxicity examined, and the patient lying dead on the table. Some of the recommendations are surprisingly substantive, urging the party to rethink its harsh stands on gay rights and to back comprehensive immigration reform, for instance. It admits many voters see the party as “scary” and “out of touch.” But with the far-right crackpot CPAC convening as its backdrop – Exhibit A in scary and out of touch -- it’s hard to see any organized GOP constituency for such changes, while there’s plenty of party opposition.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/gop_%e2%80%9cautopsy%e2%80%9d_dismembers_the_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/gop_%e2%80%9cautopsy%e2%80%9d_dismembers_the_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC chairman asked about CPAC&#8217;s failed racism panel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC launched a new initiative for minority outreach, shortly after CPAC's ill-fated panel on race]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In announcing the Republican National Committee's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%E2%80%9Cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/">plans for minority outreach</a>, Chairman Reince Priebus was asked about CPAC's panel on race that went terribly awry, and how Republicans plan to address members of the base who still hold those kinds of views of minorities.</p><p>"Question about CPAC last week, where a panel on African-American voters dissolved into a shouting match with at least one activist saying that -- talking about voters being systematically disenfranchised. How, given that sort of backdrop in the party, do you plan to overcome those challenges in your role at the RNC?" said National Press Club president Angela Greiling Keane, reading from a written question, during a press conference with Priebus at the National Press Club.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP expert: Anti-gay views hurting party&#8217;s tech recruitment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RNC's former digital strategist says her party's anti-gay views are hurting its recruitment of vital tech talent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its massive <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/130960510/Growth-Opportunity-Project">autopsy report</a> released Monday, the Republican National Committee says the party needs to get a lot better at technology if it ever hopes to win a presidential election again. "A commitment to greater technology and digital resources in all areas referenced above is critical," the task force report notes. And according to a poll conducted by the group, GOP political operatives say data analytics and better digital outreach are among the top priorities for the party heading into the 2014 and 2016 elections.</p><p>But Republicans have one very big problem when it comes to recruiting the talent needed to modernize the party's digital infrastructure: its hostility towards gay people.</p><p>That's according to <a href="http://www.lizmair.com/biography.php">Liz Mair</a>, who was the RNC's online communications director in 2008 before leaving to start her own political consulting firm. Since then, she's worked with Carly Fiorina on her 2010 California Senate bid, with Rick Perry’s 2012 presidential campaign, and with Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s successful reelection effort after a recall attempt last year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voters see GOP as  “scary&#8221; and &#8220;narrow minded,&#8221; says RNC report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%e2%80%9cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%e2%80%9cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An "autopsy" report finds that Republicans have an image as “stuffy old men” ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://growthopp.gop.com/RNC_Growth_Opportunity_Book_2013.pdf">report</a> released by the Republican National Committee's Growth and Opportunity Project finds that most voters see the party as "out of touch" and "scary," and concludes that Republicans must focus on outreach to minorities.</p><p>The report, which analyzed the GOP's losses in the 2012 elections, said that many of those surveyed described the party as "narrow minded" and a party of "stuff old men."</p><p>"Young voters are increasingly rolling their eyes at what the Party represents, and many minorities wrongly think that Republicans do not like them or want them in the country," the report says. "When someone rolls their eyes at us, they are not likely to open their ears to us."</p><p>The report recommends that the GOP "stop talking to itself" and that "If we want ethnic minority voters to support Republicans, we have to engage them, and show our sincerity." On social issues, the RNC concludes that Republicans need to be more "inclusive and welcoming."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%e2%80%9cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%e2%80%9cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP to formally endorse immigration reform</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/gop_to_formally_endorse_immigration_reform_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/gop_to_formally_endorse_immigration_reform_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 11:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Voters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican National Committee has outlined a road map to make the party more inclusive to minority voters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican National Committee will formally endorse immigration reform on Monday and outline plans for a $10 million outreach to minority groups — gay voters among them — as part of a multi-step roadmap designed to make the GOP more "welcoming and inclusive" for voters who overwhelmingly supported Democrats in 2012.</p><p>"We must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform," says one recommendation in the 100-page report obtained by The Associated Press before its official release. "If we do not, our party's appeal will continue to shrink."</p><p>The endorsement is among dozens of recommendations crafted by party leaders following a months-long self-examination prompted by last year's painful election losses. The report also calls on Republicans to take a harder line with corporate America, loosen political fundraising laws in Washington and in state capitals, and cut in half the number of candidate debates in a shortened 2016 presidential primary calendar.</p><p>"When Republicans lost in November, it was a wakeup call," Priebus says in prepared remarks to be delivered Monday at the National Press Club.</p><p>The Republican National Committee's shift on minority outreach may be the most visible change in the coming months.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/gop_to_formally_endorse_immigration_reform_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/gop_to_formally_endorse_immigration_reform_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP isn&#8217;t really interested in balancing the budget</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/gop_isnt_really_interested_in_balancing_the_budget_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/gop_isnt_really_interested_in_balancing_the_budget_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Mar 2013 15:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13227758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Ryan's budget proposal is just his party's latest attempt to redistribute income to the wealthiest one percent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Who is going to end up making all the money in the end if Obamacare continues to be in place?” Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus growled Monday on Sean Hannity’s Fox News show. “It’s going to be the big corporations, right? And who gets screwed? The middle class.”</p><p>The Republican Party makeover is breathtaking. Now, suddenly, instead of accusing Democrats of being “redistributionists,” the GOP is posing as defender of the middle class against corporate America — and it’s doing so by proposing to do away with the most progressive piece of legislation in well over a decade.</p><p>Paul Ryan’s new budget purportedly gets about 40 percent of its $4.6 trillion in spending cuts over ten years by repealing Obamacare, but Ryan’s budget document doesn’t mention that such a repeal would also lower taxes on corporations and the wealthy that foot Obamacare’s bill.</p><p>According to an <a href="http://taxfoundation.org/article/health-care-reform-how-much-does-it-redistribute-income">analysis</a> by the non-partisan Tax Foundation, Obamacare redistributes income from the wealthy to the middle class. This is mainly because it hikes Medicare taxes on the top 2 percent (singles earning more than $200,000 and couples earning more than $250,000, including their investment income).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/gop_isnt_really_interested_in_balancing_the_budget_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/13/gop_isnt_really_interested_in_balancing_the_budget_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC chairman: Karl Rove&#8217;s attacks are &#8220;a fool&#8217;s game&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["These biologically stupid things that people say" are the problem, he said, not the GOP platform [UPDATED]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update - March 11, 8:33 a.m.:</strong> RNC spokesman Sean Spicer clarified to Salon that Preibus was not referring to Rove's effort, but rather that engaging in such an effort would be "a fool's game" for the RNC.</p><p><strong>From earlier:</strong></p><p>RNC Chairman Reince Priebus said that Karl Rove's plan to target far-right conservatives in the primaries, like potential Iowa Senate candidate Rep. Steve King, is "a fool's game because you can’t actually predict some of the things that go on.”</p><p>“Listen, I don’t think our platform is the issue,” Priebus said, <a href="http://www.radioiowa.com/2013/03/07/rnc-chair-says-roves-planned-attack-on-king-a-fools-game-audio/">Radio Iowa</a> reports. “I think a lot of times it’s some of these biologically stupid things that people say, you know, that I believe caused a lot of the problems.”</p><p>He continued: "Personally, as an RNC [Chair], I don’t believe in that. I don’t believe the party should pick winners and losers in primaries and I think it’s, historically, if you look at it, it’s a bit of a fool’s game because you can’t actually predict some of the things that go on.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP opens 2013 with money advantage over Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/gop_opens_2013_with_money_advantage_over_democrats_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/gop_opens_2013_with_money_advantage_over_democrats_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundraising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC raised $6.9 million in January, while the DNC only brought in $4.3 million]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican National Committee is starting 2013 with a financial advantage over its Democratic rivals.</p><p>The RNC raised $6.9 million in January and ended the month with $7.1 million in cash — along with no debt.</p><p>The Democratic National Committee brought in $4.3 million in January and ended the month with $4.7 million in cash.</p><p>But the DNC is carrying a large debt of $20.7 million, down slightly from the end of the year. Democrats racked up the debt while helping President Barack Obama hold onto the White House.</p><p>Party committees filed monthly financial reports Wednesday with the Federal Election Commission.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/gop_opens_2013_with_money_advantage_over_democrats_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/gop_opens_2013_with_money_advantage_over_democrats_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voters to the GOP: It&#8217;s not you, it&#8217;s your ideas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/voters_to_the_gop_its_not_you_its_your_ideas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/voters_to_the_gop_its_not_you_its_your_ideas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 17:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13184053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans continue to believe that their problem in 2012 was their messaging. It wasn't]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> Over the weekend, conservative activists and politicians got together under the banner of the National Review to discuss the future. How can Republicans recover from 2012 and move the United States away from the liberalism of Barack Obama and the Democratic Party? While some political observers have called for ideological reform—a reorientation of the GOP’s priorities—Republicans themselves are less interested in taking this path. According to GOP insiders, <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=1473A58C-9AED-4D12-AB0D-34758847FAFD">notes Politico</a> in a story on the summit, 2012 had little to do with substance and <em>everything</em> to do with message. If Republicans can change the package—and find someone more engaging than Mitt Romney—they can win:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/voters_to_the_gop_its_not_you_its_your_ideas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/voters_to_the_gop_its_not_you_its_your_ideas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>