<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Religion Dispatches</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/religion_dispatches/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 23:40:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Can interfaith dialogue cure religious violence?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/can_interfaith_dialogue_cure_religious_violence_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/can_interfaith_dialogue_cure_religious_violence_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 21:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boston marathon bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interfaith Youth Core]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four questions worth raising in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombings]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a> In the wake of the Boston Bombings, Eboo Patel, public intellectual and director of the Interfaith Youth Core (IFYC), has proposed, in a recent <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eboo-patel/3-reasons-interfaith-efforts-matter-more-than-ever_b_3134795.html" target="_blank">article</a> on HuffPo, that this explosive violence resulted partly from a failure of interfaith dialogue.</p><p>With the caveat that “interfaith programs are not a miracle solution,” he offers three ways that this work can help:</p><p>First, “interfaith helps harmonize people’s identities.” Patel goes on:</p><blockquote><p>“In America, just about everyone is some sort of hyphenated hybrid of race, religion and ethnicity/nationality... Religious extremists try to separate people’s various identities and pit them against each other.”</p></blockquote><p>Patel suggests that the Tsarnaev brothers might have been less vulnerable to extremism if they “had been involved in discussions with people from other backgrounds about how their faith identity was mutually enriching with their nationality and citizenship.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/can_interfaith_dialogue_cure_religious_violence_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/can_interfaith_dialogue_cure_religious_violence_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Terrence Malick, divine director</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/keeping_the_faith_with_malicks_to_the_wonder_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/keeping_the_faith_with_malicks_to_the_wonder_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrence Malick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[To the Wonder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faith]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13283286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In "To the Wonder," the reclusive auteur proves he's the most spiritual filmmaker working today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a>“Show, don’t tell,” is common advice to screenwriters and fiction writers. In contrast to primarily non-fictioners like yours truly, those who compose films and novels and stories are rightly encouraged to avoid didacticism, to let the story speak for itself, never to make the meanings and morals too obvious.</p><p>Terrence Malick’s typically beautiful new film, <em>To the Wonder</em>, does exactly that, yet its depiction of the divine love/human love parallel is so elliptical as to flirt with inscrutability.</p><p>To be sure, Malick’s screenplay does telegraph the main theme of the work explicitly, usually in voiceovers (there are a lot of voiceovers) by a doubt-ridden priest played by Javier Bardem. Bardem’s priest wonders why we fall in and out of love with God, as we watch a couple played by Ben Affleck and Olga Kurylenko fall in and out of love with each other. If the parallelism were not clear enough, Bardem’s priest—played with brilliant understatement by an actor who often goes for the jugular—tells us how human love can serve as a gateway to divine love. Which (metaphysical spoiler alert) is roughly the final resolution of the film.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/keeping_the_faith_with_malicks_to_the_wonder_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/keeping_the_faith_with_malicks_to_the_wonder_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religion&#8217;s media persecution complex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/there_is_not_nor_has_there_ever_been_a_media_conspiracy_against_religion_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/there_is_not_nor_has_there_ever_been_a_media_conspiracy_against_religion_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kermit Gosnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secularism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no secular conspiracy to curb religious news coverage. Audiences just aren't all that interested   ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carl M. Cannon <a href="http://dyn.realclearpolitics.com/printpage/?url=http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/04/15/the_problem_with_the_press_part_1_religion_117948.html" target="_blank">bemoans</a> the current state of religion reporting as if there was a time when the press provided smart, in-depth, contextualized coverage of religious leaders, issues, ideas, and communities. <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p>How did I miss that?</p><p>That Golden Era <a href="http://muse.jhu.edu/login?auth=0&amp;type=summary&amp;url=/journals/american_quarterly/v059/59.3winston.html" target="_blank">wasn’t in the 1980s</a> when reporters treated evangelicals as bumblers and missed the significance of the conservatives’ takeover of the Southern Baptist Convention. And it surely wasn’t during the late 1940s and 1950s when, <a href="http://journalism.missouri.edu/staff/debra-mason/" target="_blank">according to Debra Mason</a>, “the abundance of syndicated religion content says more about demand for such content than it does about the quality of religion beat reporting, given its lack of originality and its low level of journalistic skill.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/there_is_not_nor_has_there_ever_been_a_media_conspiracy_against_religion_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/there_is_not_nor_has_there_ever_been_a_media_conspiracy_against_religion_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Where Islam meets America&#8221;: The making of Zaytuna College</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/where_islam_meets_america_the_making_of_zaytuna_college_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/where_islam_meets_america_the_making_of_zaytuna_college_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zaytuna college]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Higher education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13279883</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In "Light Without Fire," author Scott Korb tells the story of America's first Muslim liberal arts college ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0807001635/?tag=saloncom08-20">Light without Fire: The Making of America's First Muslim College</a></em></p><p>by Scott Korb</p><p>Beacon Press, 2013<br /> <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a><br /> <strong>What inspired you to write <em>Light Without Fire</em>? </strong></p><p>In the wake of the Fort Hood mass shooting by Army Medical Corps officer Nadil Malik Hasan, <em>Forbes</em> published an essay under the headline “<a href="http://www.forbes.com/2009/11/08/fort-hood-nidal-malik-hasan-muslims-opinions-columnists-tunku-varadarajan.html" target="_blank">Going Muslim</a>,” written by Tunku Varadarajan, who today often writes for The Daily Beast. At the time, Varadarajan was working at NYU, where I teach writing courses, often about religion. The coinage he explained this way:</p><blockquote><p>“This phrase would describe the turn of events where a seemingly integrated Muslim-American—a friendly donut vendor in New York, say, or an officer in the U.S. Army at Fort Hood—discards his apparent integration into American society and elects to vindicate his religion in an act of messianic violence against his fellow Americans.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/where_islam_meets_america_the_making_of_zaytuna_college_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/where_islam_meets_america_the_making_of_zaytuna_college_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christians should abandon Christianity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/idolatry_of_god_author_modern_religion_is_a_macguffin_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/idolatry_of_god_author_modern_religion_is_a_macguffin_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Fundamentalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13276635</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author of "The Idolatry of God" says religion's become a commodity -- and a distraction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"<a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/1451609027/?tag=saloncom08-20">The Idolatry of God: Breaking Our Addiction to Certainty and Satisfaction" </a>by Peter Rollins<br /> Howard Books, 2013</p><p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p>For <a href="http://peterrollins.net/" target="_blank">Peter Rollins</a>, Belfast native and leading writer and thinker in the Emergent Christian movement, “God” has fallen prey to our grasping, market-driven existence — just another shiny thing we acquire to make ourselves feel OK.</p><p>Alfred Hitchcock called this (in another context entirely) the “MacGuffin,” or as Rollins explains it: “that X for which some or all of the main characters are willing to sacrifice everything, something that people want in some excessive way — the object that seems to promise fulfillment, satisfaction and lasting pleasure.”</p><p>And yet when we get our hands on the longed-for MacGuffin, it doesn’t do away with our feelings of emptiness or brokenness, and may well deepen them. Instead, Rollins argues, there is no cure for our brokenness, other than the full and complete acceptance of it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/idolatry_of_god_author_modern_religion_is_a_macguffin_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/21/idolatry_of_god_author_modern_religion_is_a_macguffin_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should atheists fight for religion in government?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/should_atheists_fight_for_religion_in_government_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/should_atheists_fight_for_religion_in_government_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atheists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13272858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nonbelievers take note: Religious life tends to decline following breakdowns in the separation of church and state]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a>Debates over separation of church and state are a staple of the culture wars, and skirmishes arise and vanish like radar blips. One recent squabble came and went with such haste, you might have missed it if you were offline for a few days.</p><p>The debate over the “Defense of Religion Act” in North Carolina played out with the predictability of a sitcom. I offer this modest proposal, then, to remind both sides that if this is a war, then they have fought to a stalemate, and it is time for some new tactics, by which I mean: the history of religion in America demonstrates that the winner of the culture war will be the side that does the opposite of everything they are doing now.</p><p>Consider the tussle in North Carolina. Last month, the ACLU filed a lawsuit against the Board of Commissioners in Rowan County, North Carolina who have a habit of opening every session with a Christian prayer. An official meeting from December 2007, for example, <a href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/nullification-meets-state-religion-in-raleigh-2/comment-page-1/" target="_blank">began:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/should_atheists_fight_for_religion_in_government_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/should_atheists_fight_for_religion_in_government_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>53</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wichita throws down gauntlet to anti-abortionists</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/whats_the_matter_with_wichita_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/whats_the_matter_with_wichita_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[george tiller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268518</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four years after the murder of a prominent abortion provider, his clinic is once again open for business]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In mid-February, on the first day of lent, Reformation Lutheran Church in Wichita, Kansas, held a small, quiet service, with a female and male pastoral team preaching about a gentle God who is slow to anger and quick to forgive.<a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p>The church, a multicolored brick building with stained glass windows that look like rolling waves, is flanked on one side by a domed Greek Orthodox church, and on the other by a field stretching out to a subdivision. Just inside its doors in 2009, 67-year-old Dr. George Tiller, one of the few late-term abortion providers in the United States and an usher at his longtime church, was <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/01/us/01tiller.html?pagewanted=all&amp;_r=3&amp;" target="_blank">shot and killed</a> by a man named Scott Roeder.</p><p>To abortion rights advocates, the murder was the tragic culmination of a decades-long campaign by abortion opponents who had stalked Dr. Tiller; barraged him with nuisance lawsuits; blockaded and bombed his clinic; shot him in both arms in a previous, failed assassination attempt; and helped inspire Fox News’ Bill O’Reilly to begin a nightly television harangue against the doctor he condemned as “Tiller the Killer.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/whats_the_matter_with_wichita_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/whats_the_matter_with_wichita_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are the culture wars really over?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/are_the_culture_wars_really_over_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/are_the_culture_wars_really_over_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[culture wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Views on sex, drugs and religion still dictate public policy decisions more than we might like to think]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a> Social psychologist Jonathan Haidt, in the latest<em> <a href="http://www.democracyjournal.org/28/of-freedom-and-fairness.php?page=all" target="_blank">Democracy</a></em>:</p><blockquote><p>In 1943, Allied forces achieved a hard-fought victory in the North African campaign, captured Sicily, and began to fight their way up the Italian peninsula. Victories in places such as El-Alamein, Salerno, and Anzio gave America some confidence that the Allies would ultimately prevail in Europe. That confidence allowed the American public to shift more of its attention to the Pacific Theater. Popular magazines such as <em>National Geographic</em> began to publish more maps and articles about the Pacific because Americans suddenly wanted to know a lot more about Saipan and Leyte Gulf.</p> <p>The same sort of shift is happening now for the left in America’s long-running culture war. From the 1980s until the birth of the Tea Party, most of the action was in the Social Theater, in which the religious right and the secular left waged an existential struggle for the soul of American society. Issues related to sexuality, drugs, religion, family life, and patriotism were particularly vexing, and many people over 40 can recall the names of battlefields such as Mapplethorpe, needle exchange, 2 Live Crew, and the flag-burning amendment. But the left won a smashing victory in the 2012 elections, including the first victories at the ballot box for gay marriage. These triumphs, combined with polling data showing the tolerant attitudes of younger voters, give the left confidence that it will ultimately prevail on most issues in the Social Theater. The power base of the religious right is older, white, rural Protestants, a group that immigration, demography, and urban renewal have consigned to play an ever-shrinking role in American presidential elections.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/are_the_culture_wars_really_over_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/are_the_culture_wars_really_over_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The Bible,&#8221; brought to you by Walmart</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/the_bible_brought_to_you_by_walmart_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/the_bible_brought_to_you_by_walmart_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 05:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Ten Commandments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joel Osteen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The miniseries' corporate sponsors tell you as much about the production as the artists behind it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a> <em>The Bible</em> miniseries concluded Easter Sunday on The History Channel, with a fairly conventional playing out of the Passion story. From Cecil B. DeMille’s <em>King of Kings </em>(1927) to <em>Jesus </em>(a Campus Crusade for Christ production from 1979) to Mel Gibson’s 2004 gorefest <em>The Passion</em>, generations of Americans have seen this in film form before. And, while the twitter-storm that grew up (and quickly passed over) about how Satan looked like Obama was a tempest in a teapot, it is entirely true to the genre that Satan must appear as darker-skinned, as Scott Poole (a scholar of how Satan appears in American history) explains <a href="http://www.christiancentury.org/blogs/archive/2013-03/satan-innbspthe-bible" target="_blank">here</a>. (To me, he most resembled Emperor Palpatine from <em>The Empire Strikes Back</em>; either that, or the Grim Reaper from <em>The Seventh Seal</em>).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/the_bible_brought_to_you_by_walmart_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/the_bible_brought_to_you_by_walmart_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS, civil religious court</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/civil_religion_is_alive_and_kicking_in_supreme_courts_marriage_equality_debate_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/civil_religion_is_alive_and_kicking_in_supreme_courts_marriage_equality_debate_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 18:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christian coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Defense of Marriage Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13261531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Striking down Prop 8 and DOMA isn't just a fiduciary responsibility, it's a moral imperative]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Civil religion” is one of those twentieth-century terms that seems rather quaint today. And yet, as the Supreme Court marriage cases are heard this week, it seems alive and well, and living in unusual spaces.</p><p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a><br /> On the surface, the <em>Windsor</em> and <em>Perry </em>cases are about constitutional rights, and the limits of federal government (not to mention the procedural questions of standing, mind-numbing to non-lawyers but conceivably dispositive here). Does the combination of federalism and an equal protection violation justify overturning the Defense of Marriage Act? What is the relationship between the US Constitution, the California constitution, and a voter initiative that defines certain rights?</p><p>And yet, these questions are surely not the real issue.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/civil_religion_is_alive_and_kicking_in_supreme_courts_marriage_equality_debate_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/civil_religion_is_alive_and_kicking_in_supreme_courts_marriage_equality_debate_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Traditional marriage&#8217;s&#8221; lamest defense</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/marriage_equality_is_not_common_sense_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/marriage_equality_is_not_common_sense_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When will conservatives let go of the idea that gay marriage threatens the future of the human race?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p>Heritage Foundation fellow Ryan T. Anderson’s defense of one-man-one-woman marriage in the <em>Washington Post</em> <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-faith/in-defense-of-traditional-marriage/2013/03/20/d19a0c08-915a-11e2-bdea-e32ad90da239_story.html" target="_blank">argues</a> that Americans should affirm the “traditional” model of marriage for the good of the country. “Marriage is based on the biological fact that reproduction depends on a man and a woman,” he writes, “and on the social reality that children need a mother and a father.”</p><p>In other words, nature teaches that marriage is about complementarity between genitals, hormones, and gonads. To redefine marriage as something other than responsible parenthood would be to override nature’s law and give in to those selfish desires that undermine the common good.</p><p><a name="more"></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/marriage_equality_is_not_common_sense_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/marriage_equality_is_not_common_sense_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;God loves Uganda,&#8221; hates gays</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/god_loves_uganda_hates_gays_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/god_loves_uganda_hates_gays_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IHOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new documentary examines the far-right's role in fomenting violent homophobia in the African nation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a>  While conservative evangelical and Catholic leaders complain loudly about the “<a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/politics/5534/in_2012_bishops_join_fight_to_repackage_discrimination_as_%E2%80%98religious_freedom%E2%80%99/" target="_blank">persecution</a>” they suffer in the United States, the culture wars they are igniting and supporting around the world subject LGBT people and their allies to very real persecution.</p><p>The role that American religious right leaders have played in fomenting anti-gay bigotry in Uganda has been well-documented, but never before with the emotional punch delivered by <em><a href="http://www.godlovesuganda.com/" target="_blank">God Loves Uganda</a></em>, a new documentary by Academy Award-winning director Roger Ross Williams that premiered at this year’s Sundance Film Festival.</p><p>“I love Uganda,” says Kapya Koama in the film’s opening words. But, “something frightening is happening that has the potential to destroy Uganda.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/god_loves_uganda_hates_gays_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/god_loves_uganda_hates_gays_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mormons finally &#8220;let women pray&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/mormon_women_to_pray_for_first_time_in_lds_world_meeting_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/mormon_women_to_pray_for_first_time_in_lds_world_meeting_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mormon Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church of Latter-day Saints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Equality]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13252366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An activist movement has prompted the church to finally allow a woman to offer invocation at its general conference]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p>Sources inside the LDS Church say that a woman will for the first time in the history of Mormonism offer an invocation or benediction at the Church’s worldwide General Conference, this April 6–7, veteran religion journalist Peggy Fletcher Stack of the Salt Lake Tribune <a href="http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/56026380-78/women-general-conference-lds.html.csp" target="_blank">reports</a>.</p><p>The announcement comes after Mormon feminists and their allies mounted a “<a href="http://letwomenpray.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">Let Women Pray</a>” letter-writing campaign this winter. (LDS officials say that the Conference program was set “many weeks ago.”)</p><p>Women’s advocates within the LDS Church like LDS WAVE have long pointed to the continuing restriction on women praying in the Church’s global meetings as one of many examples of <a href="http://www.ldswave.org/?p=402" target="_blank">day-to-day gender inequalities</a> in the practice of Mormonism—most of them having absolutely no foundation in current Church teachings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/mormon_women_to_pray_for_first_time_in_lds_world_meeting_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/26/mormon_women_to_pray_for_first_time_in_lds_world_meeting_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The pope is not the church</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/pope_francis_doesnt_represent_all_catholics_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/pope_francis_doesnt_represent_all_catholics_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pope Francis I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13242920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the new pope has an important role, but we shouldn't forget that he's only part of the larger Catholic package]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>The pope is not the church</em>.</p><p>It’s going to be very tempting to forget this fact over the next few days. The pundits, Catholic and otherwise, have been rapt in the suspense of awaiting the arrival of Pope Francis. We heard a lot of impossible hopes for who the next pope would be, along with the less thrilling reality of the actual candidates. But Catholics, along with the masses who have been suddenly and momentarily interested in Catholic affairs, should remember that the papacy is not to be confused with the church itself. At no time should this have been more clear than those strange and special few days when the Catholic Church was a people—an assembly, a community, a mystical body—without a pope.<br /> <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/pope_francis_doesnt_represent_all_catholics_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/pope_francis_doesnt_represent_all_catholics_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pope Francis, please remember the women!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/pope_bergoglio_please_remember_the_women_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/pope_bergoglio_please_remember_the_women_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 16:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poverty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vatican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reversing the Church's retrograde notions of gender may be the sternest challenge of the new papacy ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p>Well, we have a pope. After almost two weeks of speculation, prediction, even handicapping, the first non-European pope in over a thousand years, Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio of Buenos Aires, stepped out on the Vatican loggia at 8:22 Central European Time today to be introduced to the world.</p><p>In some respects, the election of Cardinal Bergoglio is a very promising sign. As an archbishop from the most populous Catholic continent on earth, Latin America, the new Pope Francis I symbolizes a shift that has been a very long time coming, from Euro-centrism to the church of the Global South. And his reputation as an advocate for the poor, emphasizing the Christian Gospel of love, washing the feet of AIDS victims, and more.</p><p>The new pope’s legacy will stand him in good stead as well, since his parents were Italians, and he speaks Italian fluently—not a bad thing for a pope—even as he has never served in the Vatican curia, the focus of much criticism and concern in recent months. He is also the first Jesuit pope in history. Being a member of the largest religious order in the church certainly can’t hurt.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/pope_bergoglio_please_remember_the_women_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/pope_bergoglio_please_remember_the_women_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evangelical church accused of ignoring sexual abuse, &#8220;pedophilia ring&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/evangelical_church_accused_of_ignoring_sexual_abuse_pedophilia_ring_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/evangelical_church_accused_of_ignoring_sexual_abuse_pedophilia_ring_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evangelicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[churches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover-ups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13226621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sovereign Grace is not the first church to face cover-up allegations -- and it probably won't be the last]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was not surprised when Sovereign Grace Ministries (SGM), the church group I grew up in as a teen and young adult, was served with a lawsuit this past October, alleging <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-10-17/lawsuit-claims-evangelical-church-hid-abuse-claims" target="_blank">clergy cover-ups of sexual abuse</a>.<br /> <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p>Sadly, I was even less surprised when the suit was amended in January to include Covenant Life Church (CLC), the congregation I had attended for nine years, and to add <a href="http://www.courier-journal.com/article/20130114/NEWS01/301140087/New-abuse-allegations-target-co-founder-others-Sovereign-Grace-Ministries" target="_blank">new charges of physical and sexual abuse</a> by pastors, as well as allegations of abuse on church property. From what I’d seen inside Sovereign Grace and Covenant Life from 1996–2005, the alleged abuse seemed almost predictable—the result of the group’s toxic teachings on parenting, gender, and sexuality.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/evangelical_church_accused_of_ignoring_sexual_abuse_pedophilia_ring_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/12/evangelical_church_accused_of_ignoring_sexual_abuse_pedophilia_ring_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives can&#8217;t get enough of &#8220;The Bible&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/conservatives_cant_get_enough_of_the_bible_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/conservatives_cant_get_enough_of_the_bible_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the history channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesus Christ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13225073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The History Channel's new series is being championed by the likes of Glenn Beck and Joel Osteen. Of course it is]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where have I seen this before? Moses realizing his calling, leading his people, parting the Red Sea (only this time with CGI assistance); Samson, falling for Delilah; King David, marching as to war; Jesus (yet <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/books/culture/6509/mitt_s_jesus__barack_s_jesus__and_why_christ_s_color_matters" target="_blank">another</a> fine-looking white guy), breathless, sexy, mouthing his beatitudes before suffering on the cross; and much, much more. Admittedly, I had not seen Noah (portrayed here by an actor with a fine Scottish brogue) deliver some of the key Creation verses from Genesis on film before, but that prologue was a nice touch for what was, and is, to come.</p><p>Yes, it’s time for another generation to take its stab at filming the biblical epics. This time it comes in full ten-hour miniseries form and with rather apocalyptic hopes placed on its success.</p><p><em>The Bible</em> debuted on The History Channel last night (right before <em>The Vikings</em>, another full-blown historical epic miniseries—the little bit I happened to see of it featured some torrid sex scenes). Reality TV producer Mark Burnett (<em>Survivor, The Apprentice</em>) credits his wife Roma Downey (formerly of <em>Touched by an Angel,</em> here playing Mary, mother of Jesus, in the film) with inspiring the idea for the film:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/conservatives_cant_get_enough_of_the_bible_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/conservatives_cant_get_enough_of_the_bible_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Protestant liberal defends clerical celibacy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/clerical_celibacy_isnt_all_about_sex_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/clerical_celibacy_isnt_all_about_sex_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celibacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholicism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protestants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A vow of abstinence can remind a believer of values like contentment and solidarity, even if it's not for everyone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p>Frank Bruni’s<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/26/opinion/bruni-the-wages-of-celibacy.html?smid=fb-share&amp;_r=0" target="_blank"> recent op-ed on clerical celibacy</a> states in no uncertain terms that “celibacy is a bad idea with painful consequences.”</p><p>“The pledge of celibacy that the church requires of its servants is an often cruel and corrosive thing,” he writes. “It runs counter to human nature.” People need companionship, including bodily companionship, and it’s plainly unnatural to ask them to forego it for an entire lifetime. He also sees it as a sort of spiritual neon sign that attracts people who are uncomfortable with their sexuality, usually because it falls outside the one-man-one-woman pattern. “It’s a trap” for those who stray from cultural norms, whether gay men or pedophiles, “falsely promising some men a refuge from sexual desires that worry them.” Thus he concludes that celibacy is a large factor in the sexual abuse of children within the Church.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/clerical_celibacy_isnt_all_about_sex_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/clerical_celibacy_isnt_all_about_sex_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mormon church rewrites its racist history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/changes_in_mormon_scriptures_to_reflect_shifting_views_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/changes_in_mormon_scriptures_to_reflect_shifting_views_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Church of Latter-day Saints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mormon Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The four books of LDS have been revised to provide context for the religion's former ban on black priests]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p><a href="https://www.lds.org/scriptures/press?lang=eng" target="_blank">A newly released digital edition</a> of the four books of LDS or Mormon scripture—the Holy Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine and Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price—includes editorial changes that reflect a shifting official view on issues like polygamy, the Church’s history of racism, and the historicity of LDS scripture.</p><p>Perhaps the most significant is the inclusion of a new heading to precede the now-canonized 1978 announcement of the end of the LDS Church’s ban on black priesthood ordination:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/changes_in_mormon_scriptures_to_reflect_shifting_views_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/changes_in_mormon_scriptures_to_reflect_shifting_views_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can religion support feminism?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/can_religion_support_feminism_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/can_religion_support_feminism_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion Dispatches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Lean In" social movement aims to empower women, but it may have a hard time in segregated religious circles]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/RDLogo165x180.jpeg" alt="Religion Dispatches" /></a></p><p>Just about everyone is <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/sheryl-sandbergs-lean-in-campaign-holds-little-for-most-women/2013/02/25/c584c9d2-7f51-11e2-a350-49866afab584_story.html" target="_blank">piling on</a> Facebook-COO Sheryl Sandberg, who aims to launch not only <em>Lean In</em> the book on March 11 but a slickly-designed national Lean In movement to propel more ambitious women up the ladder.</p><p>“I always thought I’d run a social movement,” Sandberg has said.</p><p>“People come to a social movement from the bottom up, not the top down,” <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/24/opinion/sunday/dowd-pompom-girl-for-feminism.html" target="_blank">replied Maureen Dowd</a> on Sunday. “Sandberg has co-opted the vocabulary and romance of a social movement not to sell a cause, but herself.”</p><p>Details, details, details.</p><p>I for one am not complaining that the Sandberg hype is helping rebuild feminist buzz. I like hearing those syllables—<em>feminism—</em>sounded out proudly to the world, especially by people who are making off like bandits with its benefits.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/can_religion_support_feminism_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/can_religion_support_feminism_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>