<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Rep. John Lewis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/rep_john_lewis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tucker Carlson, you’re no Andrew Breitbart!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/tucker_carlson_you%e2%80%99re_no_andrew_breitbart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/tucker_carlson_you%e2%80%99re_no_andrew_breitbart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tucker Carlson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Caller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. John Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shirley Sherrod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Menendez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hating Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13250586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A hyped-up scandal and a lame documentary remind us that the blogger’s showmanship is gone, but his hatred lives on]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strangely, the night before the latest humiliation of the Daily Caller’s Tucker Carlson -- by <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/dominican-official-links-daily-caller-to-alleged-lies-about-menendez/2013/03/22/d81470d0-930a-11e2-8ea1-956c94b6b5b9_story.html?Post+generic=%3Ftid%3Dsm_twitter_washingtonpost">a Washington Post report</a> that the Caller’s key source for its “scoop” that Sen. Robert Menendez patronized prostitutes now says the website paid him to find women who would lie about it  -- I watched the documentary “Hating Breitbart,” a hagiographic 90 minutes of the late Andrew Breitbart ranting, vamping and raging for the admiring camera of his friend Andrew Marcus.</p><p>I wasn’t going to write about it, not because I hate Breitbart – I didn’t, and don’t – but because, sadly, it’s kind of slight. It doesn’t do justice to its outsize subject, however much it worships him. But the Carlson news juxtaposed with the documentary reminded me how much more talented Breitbart was than the pale imitators he left behind – as well as how much his rage-fueled, by-any-means-necessary character assassination posing as journalism lives on, albeit ineptly.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/tucker_carlson_you%e2%80%99re_no_andrew_breitbart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/25/tucker_carlson_you%e2%80%99re_no_andrew_breitbart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The man behind the voter fraud myth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/the_man_behind_the_voter_fraud_myth/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/the_man_behind_the_voter_fraud_myth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. John Lewis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13048337</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five key takeaways from Jane Mayer's scathing New Yorker piece]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week's New Yorker features a blistering <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/10/29/121029fa_fact_mayer?currentPage=all">investigation</a> by Jane Mayer into Hans von Spakovsky, a leading propagator of voter fraud myths. His work has led to a flurry of legislation and voting restrictions pushed by Republicans.</p><p>Spakovsky, a Republican lawyer who worked in the Bush administration and is a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation, is a key supporter of True the Vote, the Houston-based group that has been pushing for these new laws. "Although the group has a spontaneous grassroots aura," Mayer writes, "it was founded by a local Tea Party activist, Catherine Engelbrecht, and from the start it has received guidance from intensely partisan election lawyers and political operatives, who have spent years stoking fear about election fraud."</p><p>Here are the five most scathing parts of the article:</p><p>John Lewis, D-Ga., an activist during the civil rights era, on von Spakovsky:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/the_man_behind_the_voter_fraud_myth/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/the_man_behind_the_voter_fraud_myth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgia&#8217;s immigration law targets universities</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/24/georgias_immigration_law_targets_universities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/24/georgias_immigration_law_targets_universities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. John Lewis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12424651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A crackdown on undocumented students deflects attention from the state's enemies of higher education]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the state of Arizona enacted a draconian anti-immigrant law -- which gave the police wide powers to detain individuals they believed to be undocumented immigrants -- nearly <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/24/us/politics/24immig.html">two years ago</a>, the national media took notice. Activists campaigned against the law and tried to shame the state into submission, with Rage Against the Machine's Zack de la Rocha even <a href="http://www.billboard.com/news/rage-against-the-machine-michael-moore-lead-1004093837.story#/news/rage-against-the-machine-michael-">getting dozens of musicians</a> to sign on to a boycott of performances in the state.</p><p>Yet soon after Arizona's law passed, similar anti-immigrant legislation began appearing in legislatures across the nation. Partially coordinated by the American Legislative Exchange Council, a conservative advocacy group <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/politics/2010/09/16/117661/sb1070-prison-lobby/),">funded in part</a> by private prisons, states from coast to coast initiated their own crackdowns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/24/georgias_immigration_law_targets_universities/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/02/24/georgias_immigration_law_targets_universities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Lewis: I support OWS protesters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/09/john_lewis_i_support_ows_protesters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/09/john_lewis_i_support_ows_protesters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. John Lewis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10106156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Though the Atlanta group didn't ask him to speak, the civil rights hero calls it "grassroots democracy at its best"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A YouTube video made its way around Twitter Saturday, showing the Atlanta offshoot of Occupy Wall Street in the middle of a General Assembly meeting, debating whether to ask Rep. John Lewis speak to the group. The answer was no, and the reaction on Twitter was almost unanimously negative: How could these people insult a civil rights hero that way?</p><p>I had the same reaction – until I understood what exactly occurred. It turns out Lewis came by, on his own, during a General Assembly meeting, to observe the group, and didn't ask to speak. One of the activists suggested that he be invited to say a few words, and most of the assembly seemed fine with that – until one of them, a guy identified as Joe, stood up and disagreed. While expressing respect for Lewis's work, he said the movement was "not about one individual" and it supported "no hierarchy." Because the group was in a planning session, someone suggested that Lewis speak at the end of their agenda, but the congressman had another event and couldn't stay.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/09/john_lewis_i_support_ows_protesters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/09/john_lewis_i_support_ows_protesters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
