<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > reproductive health</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/reproductive_health/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 14:19:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota lawmaker: Blame Roe v. Wade for school shootings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/north_dakota_lawmaker_blame_roe_v_wade_for_school_shootings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/north_dakota_lawmaker_blame_roe_v_wade_for_school_shootings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurora shooting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Kevin Cramer cited "abortion on demand" as the reason "our culture sees school shootings so often"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In his remarks at the University of Mary's 2013 commencement, Rep. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) blamed Roe v. Wade for tragedies like the Sandy Hook and Aurora theater shootings. Because Cramer, who has a <a href="http://www.ontheissues.org/House/Kevin_Cramer_Gun_Control.htm" target="_blank">perfect AQ rating</a> from the National Rifle Association, certainly wouldn't think gun violence has anything to do with, you know, guns.</p><p>An excerpt (emphasis mine):</p><blockquote><p>Just in the last several days, a Bismarck news anchor mistakenly uttered vulgarity on live television. He's been heralded by celebrities from New York to California as some sort of pop icon. His bosses have been called goons because they fired him.</p> <p>We learned this week that the Pentagon is vetting its guide on religious tolerance with a group that compared Christian evangelism to rape, and advocated that military personnel and colluding chaplains who proselytize should be court-marshalled.</p> <p><strong>Forty years ago, the United States Supreme Court sanctioned abortion on demand. And we wonder why our culture sees school shootings so often.</strong></p></blockquote><p>Not exactly "<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFt7EzpsZQo" target="_blank">This is water</a>," is it?</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/north_dakota_lawmaker_blame_roe_v_wade_for_school_shootings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/north_dakota_lawmaker_blame_roe_v_wade_for_school_shootings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legal challenges begin against North Dakota&#8217;s draconian abortion laws</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/legal_challenges_begin_against_north_dakotas_draconian_abortion_laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/legal_challenges_begin_against_north_dakotas_draconian_abortion_laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TRAP laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advocates have filed the first of several lawsuits expected against North Dakota's restrictive abortion laws]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>North Dakota's last remaining abortion clinic has filed a suit challenging a law that requires doctors who perform abortions to obtain hospital-admitting privileges, the first in a series of legal challenges reproductive rights advocates have promised to wage against the state's draconian abortion restrictions.</p><p>The Red River Women's Clinic argues in the suit that the law could make abortion impossible to access in the state, effectively banning it.</p><p>President and CEO of the Center for Reproductive Rights Nancy Northup, a co-sponsor of the suit, said in a statement on Wednesday that the law is a dangerous barrier to safe abortion care that could jeopardize women's health: "With their relentless campaign to end safe and legal abortion in North Dakota, lawmakers have effectively told the women of their state, 'We don't care about your health, we don't care about your safety, and we sure don't care about your constitutional and human rights.'"</p><p>As the Associated Press <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/legal-challenges-begin-against-nd-abortion-laws" target="_blank">notes</a>, the requirements mandated by the law, set to take effect on August 1, are almost impossible for the state's last remaining clinic to comply with: "Opponents of the measure say it's impossible for abortion doctors in North Dakota to meet the minimum number of hospital visits required for because the procedure is safe and women rarely need further care."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/legal_challenges_begin_against_north_dakotas_draconian_abortion_laws/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/legal_challenges_begin_against_north_dakotas_draconian_abortion_laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arkansas abortion ban faces legal challenge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/arkansas_abortion_ban_faces_legal_challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/arkansas_abortion_ban_faces_legal_challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arkansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experts say the 12-week abortion ban "has no chance of surviving a careful constitutional challenge"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The American Civil Liberties Union and the Center for Reproductive Rights have filed a lawsuit to block an Arkansas law banning abortion care after 12 weeks from going into effect.</p><p>Arkansas Gov. Mike Beebe had <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/the_nations_most_extreme_abortion_law_and_the_man_behind_it/" target="_blank">vetoed the extreme measure</a> in March, citing concerns that it violated Roe v. Wade and that subsequent legal challenges would prove "very costly to the taxpayers of our state" as the "costs and fees [of defending an unconstitutional law] can be significant." The Legislature overrode Beebe's veto in March.</p><p>The suit seeks a preliminary injunction against the law, which is set to take effect in July.</p><p>“This law is one of the most dangerous assaults on women’s health that we’ve seen in decades,” said Rita Sklar, executive director of the ACLU of Arkansas. “We may not all agree about abortion, but we can all agree that this complex and personal decision should be made by a woman, her family, and her doctor, not politicians.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/arkansas_abortion_ban_faces_legal_challenge/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/arkansas_abortion_ban_faces_legal_challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ohio lawmakers advance measure to ban discussing &#8220;gateway sexual activity&#8221; in sex education</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/ohio_lawmakers_advance_measure_to_ban_discussing_gateway_sexual_activity_in_sex_education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/ohio_lawmakers_advance_measure_to_ban_discussing_gateway_sexual_activity_in_sex_education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13273674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The state finance committee is very concerned about heavy petting]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republicans in the Ohio House of Representatives have <a href="http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2013/04/17/medicaid-still-no-but-sex-limits-advanced.html" target="_blank">advanced a budget amendment</a> that would allow parents to sue schools if their child receives sex education that appears to condone “gateway sexual activity."</p><p>What is gateway sexual activity? Lawmakers borrowed from Ohio criminal code to define it as “any touching of an erogenous zone of another, including without limitation the thigh, genitals, buttock, pubic region, or, if the person is a female, a breast, for the purpose of sexually arousing or gratifying either person.” So, basically, anything upwards of and including <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baseball_metaphors_for_sex" target="_blank">second base</a>. If a student receives such an education, a parent can sue for damages and the school could be liable for up to $5,000 in fines.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/ohio_lawmakers_advance_measure_to_ban_discussing_gateway_sexual_activity_in_sex_education/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/ohio_lawmakers_advance_measure_to_ban_discussing_gateway_sexual_activity_in_sex_education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arkansas Senate votes to defund Planned Parenthood and sex education</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/arkansas_senate_votes_to_defund_planned_parenthood_and_sex_education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/arkansas_senate_votes_to_defund_planned_parenthood_and_sex_education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sex ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bill also bans funding for organizations that contract with abortion providers, like power and water companies ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Arkansas state Senate passed a measure on Tuesday to defund Planned Parenthood and all other entities that provide abortions or patient referrals for abortions. The bill also cuts the funding for a Planned Parenthood-administered comprehensive sex education program in the state's public high schools.</p><p>No more sex education? That should bode well for a state that just <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/the_nations_most_extreme_abortion_law_and_the_man_behind_it/" target="_blank">banned abortion</a> at 12 weeks.</p><p>The Senate measure also prohibits any organization that holds contracts with abortion providers or referrers, including, as Laura Basset at the Huffington Post <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/09/arkansas-planned-parenthood-sex-ed_n_3047024.html" target="_blank">notes</a>, power companies, water companies, health insurers and medical suppliers, from receiving any state money.</p><p>Despite the fact that Planned Parenthood does not currently receive any state funding for abortion care or family planning services, bill sponsor Republican state Rep. Gary Stubblefield and other supporters argue that it will prevent taxpayer money from paying for abortions. In reality, the only loser under the new measure is the state's sex education program. And, of course, Arkansas students.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/arkansas_senate_votes_to_defund_planned_parenthood_and_sex_education/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/arkansas_senate_votes_to_defund_planned_parenthood_and_sex_education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>North Dakota and Arkansas gear up for legal challenges to extreme abortion laws</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/north_dakota_and_arkansas_gear_up_for_legal_challenges_to_extreme_abortion_laws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/north_dakota_and_arkansas_gear_up_for_legal_challenges_to_extreme_abortion_laws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13257679</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reproductive rights advocates contend both laws violate Roe v. Wade, and expect them to be struck down in court ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reproductive rights advocates are preparing to challenge two of the nation's most restrictive abortion bans.</p><p>In March, the Arkansas Legislature overrode a veto by Democratic Gov. Mike Beebe to pass a law criminalizing abortion after 12 weeks. Later that month in North Dakota, with the support of Republican Gov. Jack Dalrymple, lawmakers passed a "fetal heartbeat" law that banned the procedure at five to six weeks. Abortion rights and reproductive health advocates contend both laws violate a woman's constitutionally protected right to an abortion as set out by Roe v. Wade, which defines fetal viability between 22 and 24 weeks.</p><p>"I think they're going to be blocked immediately by the courts — they are so far outside the clear bounds of what the Supreme Court has said for 40 years," Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/03/31/abortion-ban-arkansas-north-dakota/2039803/" target="_blank">told</a> USA Today.</p><p>Lawyers from the center and the American Civil Liberties Union will lead the court challenges, and expect victories that would require both states to pay their attorneys' fees.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/north_dakota_and_arkansas_gear_up_for_legal_challenges_to_extreme_abortion_laws/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/north_dakota_and_arkansas_gear_up_for_legal_challenges_to_extreme_abortion_laws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Contraception is good for the economy, everything else</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/report_contraception_is_good_for_the_economy_everything_else/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/report_contraception_is_good_for_the_economy_everything_else/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 20:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13248303</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A comprehensive review finds that a woman's ability to control her own fertility is good for women -- and society ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>Women with reliable access to contraception tend to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/teen_birth_rate_hits_a_record_low/" target="_blank">delay and space out when they have babies</a>. And according to a new Guttmacher Institute <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/media/nr/2013/03/21/index.html" target="_blank">review</a> of more than 66 studies conducted over three decades, a woman's ability to control her fertility affects much more than just if and when she'll start a family; contraception plays a big a role in the financial, professional and emotional lives of American women, too.</p> <p>In fact, access to contraception was found to be related to all sorts of positive outcomes in family, mental health, children's well-being and general life satisfaction.</p> <p><a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/media/nr/2013/03/21/index.html" target="_blank">According to</a> Adam Sonfield, lead author of the review:</p> <blockquote><p>The scientific evidence strongly confirms what has long been obvious to women. Contraceptive use, and the ensuing ability to decide whether and when to have children, is linked to a host of benefits for themselves, the quality of their relationships, and the well-being of their children.</p></blockquote> <p>But, he went on to say, access to birth control remains uneven and unequal in the United States, which means that women who are economically disadvantaged or otherwise marginalized don't share in these benefits. Recommendations from Sonfield and the literature call for policies that ground "unintended pregnancy prevention efforts... in broader antipoverty and social justice efforts."</p> <p>Read the <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/social-economic-benefits.pdf" target="_blank">research</a> for a more in-depth analysis, but here's the short version: Women controlling their own fertility is a really, really good thing for the world.</p> <p>Major takeaways from the review, according to the Institute:</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/report_contraception_is_good_for_the_economy_everything_else/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/report_contraception_is_good_for_the_economy_everything_else/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arkansas bans abortion after 12 weeks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/the_nations_most_extreme_abortion_law_and_the_man_behind_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/the_nations_most_extreme_abortion_law_and_the_man_behind_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2013 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national right to life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason rapert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13221750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arkansas state Sen. Jason Rapert is behind the most extreme anti-abortion law in the nation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less than a week after successfully banning abortion at 20 weeks, the Arkansas legislature voted to override Governor Mike Beebe's veto on a measure banning abortion at 12 weeks.</p><p>Under the Arkansas Human Heartbeat Protection Act, doctors will lose their medical license if they perform an abortion on a woman who is more than 12 weeks pregnant. While the ban has nominal exceptions for rape, incest and the life of the mother, it remains the most extreme abortion law currently on the books.</p><p>Beebe vetoed the bill on Monday, arguing that it is "blatantly unconstitutional" and violates the fetal viability precedent set out by Roe v. Wade.</p><p>"In short, because it would impose a ban on a woman's right to choose an elective, nontherapeutic abortion well before viability, Senate Bill 134 blatantly contradicts the United States Constitution, as interpreted by the Supreme Court," Beebe said in his statement. The governor added that such a ban would prove "very costly to the taxpayers of our state," given that "lawsuits challenging unconstitutional laws also result in the losing party -- in this case, the state -- being ordered to pay the costs and attorneys' fees incurred by the litigants who successfully challenge the law. Those costs and fees can be significant."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/the_nations_most_extreme_abortion_law_and_the_man_behind_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/07/the_nations_most_extreme_abortion_law_and_the_man_behind_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYC uses shame, petty insults in new teen pregnancy campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/nyc_uses_shame_petty_insults_in_new_teen_pregnancy_campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/nyc_uses_shame_petty_insults_in_new_teen_pregnancy_campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teen pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teen moms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Condoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan B]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But city officials have been mum on the impact of the campaign that really helps -- bringing Plan B to city schools]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Human Resources Administration launched <a title="(Open in new tab) " href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/hra/html/programs/teen_pregnancy.shtml" rel="external">a new ad campaign</a> this week that uses "straight talk" in an effort to prevent teen pregnancy. The ads feature images of sad-looking children alongside messages like "Honestly, Mom ... Chances are he won't stay with you. What happens to me?" and "I'm twice as likely not to graduate high school because you had me as a teen."</p><p>The ads have already been harshly criticized for using these statistics to shame teen mothers rather than educating sexually active young people about where they can access condoms and other contraceptive care. But the subway and bus shelter ads aren't actually the worst part.</p><p>As <a href="http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2013/03/05/nyc-teen-pregnancy-campaign-brings-shaming-to-bus-shelters-and-cell-phones/" target="_blank">reported</a> by Miriam Pérez for RH Reality Check, at the bottom of each ad is the message: “Text ‘NOTNOW’ to 877877 for the real cost of teen pregnancy.” Text the number and you're directed to a choose your own adventure "game," which includes "scenarios about Anaya being ignored by her 'baby daddy' and shunned by her parents," but no information about how <em>not </em>to get pregnant. Instead, the texts use threats of social isolation, the prospect of losing your boyfriend and petty fat-shaming to drive home the message that teenagers who get pregnant are deserving of hardship and ridicule.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/nyc_uses_shame_petty_insults_in_new_teen_pregnancy_campaign/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/nyc_uses_shame_petty_insults_in_new_teen_pregnancy_campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abortion and the playground set, no-fault divorce and &#8220;teenage harlots&#8221;: This week in crazy legislation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/abortion_and_the_playground_set_no_fault_divorce_and_teenage_harlots_this_week_in_crazy_legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/abortion_and_the_playground_set_no_fault_divorce_and_teenage_harlots_this_week_in_crazy_legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-fault divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Iowa lawmaker thinks no-fault divorce turns teens into loose women, and other bills currently making the rounds]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lawmakers in North Carolina want to teach grade-schoolers that abortion causes preterm birth, an Iowa Republican fears that no-fault divorce will turn his 16-year-old granddaughter into a a loose woman, and the Arkansas Senate is hoping to override a veto on a 12-week abortion ban.</p><p>Sadly, you can't make this stuff up. A roundup of these and other proposals that are actually being considered by real, live elected officials this week.</p><p><strong>Staying together for the kids</strong></p><p>A three-member subcommittee in the Iowa House of Representatives is currently mulling a bill that would outlaw no-fault divorce for the parents of minor children. Rep. Tedd Gassman, a Republican member of the subcommittee, said he’s "concerned about the negative impact divorce has on children," <a href="http://www.radioiowa.com/2013/03/04/bill-would-forbid-parents-from-getting-no-fault-divorce/" target="_blank">according to</a> Radio Iowa.</p><p>The issue isn't just political for Gassman -- it's personal: His daughter and son-in-law recently divorced, putting his "granddaughter at risk," he says.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/abortion_and_the_playground_set_no_fault_divorce_and_teenage_harlots_this_week_in_crazy_legislation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/abortion_and_the_playground_set_no_fault_divorce_and_teenage_harlots_this_week_in_crazy_legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arkansas House passes extreme 12-week abortion ban</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/arkansas_house_advances_extreme_12_week_abortion_ban/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/arkansas_house_advances_extreme_12_week_abortion_ban/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 23:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13208069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A previous version attempted to ban abortion at six weeks]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Arkansas House of Representatives approved a bill on Thursday that would ban abortions after 12 weeks, with exceptions for rape, incest and the health of the mother.</p><p>If passed, the law would be the most extreme abortion restriction in the country.</p><p>Want to <em>really</em> freak out? The original legislation banned abortion at <em>six weeks,</em> but lawmakers decided to "compromise" and "quiet legal concerns" by pushing the cutoff to 12 weeks. "We believe we have struck the proper balance," <a href="http://www.ajc.com/ap/ap/legislative/ark-panel-tries-again-with-12-week-abortion-ban/nWSJ4/" target="_blank">said</a> the bill's sponsor Sen. Jason Rapert, R-Conway, without any apparent irony.</p><p>Rapert defended his bill to fellow lawmakers by saying, "I'm asking you to stand up for life, and I believe when there is a heartbeat, based upon even the standard the Supreme Court has utilized, you cannot have a viable child without a heartbeat."</p><p>The bill violates the current legal definition of fetal viability, which Roe v. Wade holds at 22 - 24 weeks. Which is kind of the point, critics say.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/arkansas_house_advances_extreme_12_week_abortion_ban/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/arkansas_house_advances_extreme_12_week_abortion_ban/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mississippi&#8217;s last abortion clinic hangs in the balance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/mississippis_last_abortion_clinic_hangs_in_the_balance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/mississippis_last_abortion_clinic_hangs_in_the_balance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13188022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The state is attempting to revoke the clinic's license, citing noncompliance with a 2012 law for abortion providers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, the Mississippi Department of Health served the Jackson Women's Health Organization, the last remaining abortion provider in the state, a notice of intent to revoke the clinic's license. According to state officials, the clinic has failed to comply with a 2012 law requiring that all doctors performing abortions at the facility also have hospital admitting privileges, which reproductive health advocates argue is an arbitrary regulation intended to shutter clinics and effectively ban abortion.</p><p>The Jackson clinic has applied for admitting privileges with seven area hospitals, but has been rejected each time. State law allows healthcare facilities to <a href="http://www.jacksonfreepress.com/news/2012/nov/29/seven-hospitals-deny-jackson-abortion-clinic/" target="_blank">refuse any medical service on religious grounds</a>, which extends to granting admitting privileges, leading critics to conclude that the denials are politically motivated.</p><p>And, of course, they are.</p><p>Mississippi state lawmakers have been systematically scaling back women's access to abortion services for years, but 2012's Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers (TRAP) law could be the measure that succeeds in shuttering the state's last standing clinic, making it virtually abortion-free.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/mississippis_last_abortion_clinic_hangs_in_the_balance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/mississippis_last_abortion_clinic_hangs_in_the_balance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Israel admits Ethiopian Jewish immigrants were given birth control shots</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/israel_admits_ethiopian_jewish_immigrants_were_given_birth_control_shots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/israel_admits_ethiopian_jewish_immigrants_were_given_birth_control_shots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2013 21:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethiopia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13184186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Israeli journalist also found that most of the women given the shots say they were coerced]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Israel has admitted that it has been giving Ethiopian Jewish immigrants birth control injections, according to a <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/israel-admits-ethiopian-women-were-given-birth-control-shots.premium-1.496519" target="_blank">report</a> in Haaretz. An Israeli investigative journalist <a href="http://www.haaretz.com/news/national/israel-admits-ethiopian-women-were-given-birth-control-shots.premium-1.496519" target="_blank">also found</a> that a majority of the women given these shots say they were administered without their knowledge or consent.</p><p>Health Ministry Director General Prof. Ron Gamzu acknowledged the practice -- without directly conceding coercion was involved  -- in a letter to Israeli health maintenance organizations, instructing gynecologists in the HMOs "not to renew prescriptions for Depo-Provera for women of Ethiopian origin if for any reason there is concern that they might not understand the ramifications of the treatment.”</p><p>Depo-Provera is a hormonal form of birth control that is injected every three months.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/israel_admits_ethiopian_jewish_immigrants_were_given_birth_control_shots/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/israel_admits_ethiopian_jewish_immigrants_were_given_birth_control_shots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>79</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Mexico lawmaker wants to criminalize abortions after rape as &#8220;tampering with evidence&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/new_mexico_wants_to_criminalize_abortions_after_rape_as_tampering_with_evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/new_mexico_wants_to_criminalize_abortions_after_rape_as_tampering_with_evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2013 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State legislation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13180674</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[State Rep. Cathrynn Brown would charge a rape victim who ended her pregnancy with a third-degree felony]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Republican state legislator wants rape victims to carry their pregnancies to term, claiming the fetus could be used as "evidence" at trial.</p><p>Rep. Cathrynn Brown introduced House Bill 206 on Wednesday, which would make terminating a pregnancy caused by incest or rape a third-degree felony for "tampering with evidence," which could carry three years in prison.</p><p>“Tampering with evidence shall include procuring or facilitating an abortion, or compelling or coercing another to obtain an abortion, of a fetus that is the result of criminal sexual penetration or incest with the intent to destroy evidence of the crime," the bill says.</p><p>The bill is unlikely to pass the Democrat-controlled state legislature, but it has generated a considerable amount of outraged among reproductive health advocates.</p><p>Pat Davis of ProgressNow New Mexico, a progressive nonprofit opposing the bill, called it "blatantly unconstitutional." “The bill turns victims of rape and incest into felons and forces them to become incubators of evidence for the state,” he <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/24/new-mexico-abortion-bill_n_2541894.html?utm_hp_ref=tw" target="_blank">told</a> the Huffington Post. “According to Republican philosophy, victims who are ‘legitimately raped’ will now have to carry the fetus to term in order to prove their case.“</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/new_mexico_wants_to_criminalize_abortions_after_rape_as_tampering_with_evidence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/24/new_mexico_wants_to_criminalize_abortions_after_rape_as_tampering_with_evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support for abortion rights at an all-time high</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/support_for_abortion_rights_at_an_all_time_high/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/support_for_abortion_rights_at_an_all_time_high/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2013 13:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13178262</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A majority of Americans say Roe v. Wade should stand. Now activists on both sides are shifting strategies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new NBC/Wall Street Journal <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323301104578255831504582200.html?mod=rss_Politics_And_Policy" target="_blank">poll</a> finds that for the first time a majority of Americans, 54 percent, believe that abortion should be legal in all or most cases. The poll also found that 70 percent of Americans said Roe v. Wade shouldn't be overturned, the highest level of support for the landmark decision since 1989.</p><p>More people generally support abortion rights, but a majority of voters have views that aren't absolute on the issue. As reported by the Wall Street Journal:</p><blockquote><p>Some 31% of respondents in the poll said abortion should always be legal, and 9% believed it should be illegal without any exceptions. Between those two opinions are the 23% who thought it should be legal most of the time, but with some exceptions, and the 35% who felt it should be illegal except in circumstances of rape, incest and to save a woman's life.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/support_for_abortion_rights_at_an_all_time_high/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/support_for_abortion_rights_at_an_all_time_high/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Idaho lawmaker thinks abortion and prostitution are the same thing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/idaho_lawmaker_thinks_abortion_and_prostitution_are_the_same_thing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/idaho_lawmaker_thinks_abortion_and_prostitution_are_the_same_thing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13174164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Susan B. Anthony List might have to add abortion to its "how not to put your foot in your mouth" GOP training]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joining Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock in the annals of <em>WTF</em>? is Rep. Ron Mendive of Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.</p><p>The Republican lawmaker sent shock waves through a legislative breakfast meeting when he asked representatives from the Idaho chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union if their pro-abortion rights stance also meant that they support prostitution. As <a href="http://www.cdapress.com/news/local_news/article_712cc1e7-55f5-574e-94d6-b46f896a300e.html" target="_blank">reported</a> by the Coeur d'Alene Press, Rep. Mendive said:</p><blockquote><p>"I think that there's kind of a double standard ... With abortion there are two beating hearts, and prostitution, there's just one. If a woman were going to make a choice to be a prostitute, that's her decision as to what to do with her body."</p></blockquote><p>ACLU-Idaho executive director Monica Hopkins wasn't pleased with the comparison, to say the least:</p><blockquote><p>"He was correlating a criminal action with something that is constitutionally protected. Those are two completely separate issues. When we're talking about women's rights, and a woman's right to choose, we are talking about reproductive rights that are constitutionally protected. What Rep. Mendive was talking about in the arena of prostitution is something that the state has very clearly said is an illegal activity ... in the same way that someone may choose to rob a bank, but that would be criminal activity that is not constitutionally protected."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/idaho_lawmaker_thinks_abortion_and_prostitution_are_the_same_thing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/idaho_lawmaker_thinks_abortion_and_prostitution_are_the_same_thing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Condom ambulance&#8221; coming to a campus near you</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/condom_ambulance_coming_to_a_campus_near_you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/condom_ambulance_coming_to_a_campus_near_you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2012 18:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safe sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abstinence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13113601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A college sophomore's condom delivery start-up wants to make safe sex cool -- and convenient ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's not much need to leave the house these days. Seamless brings you sushi during a superstorm, Amazon delivers books to your doorstep and Netflix ensures that you never read them. For those curious about the next big thing in our increasingly stationary consumer culture, look no further than the <a title="Condom Ambulance " href="http://condam.net/" target="_blank">Condom Ambulance</a>, a condom delivery service for your latest sex emergency.</p><p>Launched by College of New Jersey sophomore and interactive multimedia major Kyle McCabe, the Condom Ambulance will get you good and prophylactic-ed within minutes of placing your order by phone, text or Web. After a customer fills out the order form, provides an on-campus location and signs a waiver, McCabe hurries over with your order -- $3 for one condom, and up to 10 for $15 -- and discreetly slips it under your door. The website promises: you've gone from "kissing, to condoms, to sexy-time in mere seconds."</p><p>McCabe's motivation for starting the Condom Ambulance isn't purely financial, as he <a title="The Signal " href="http://www.tcnjsignal.net/2012/10/24/condam-to-the-rescue-new-business-promotes-sexual-health/" target="_blank">told</a> his campus newspaper, the Signal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/condom_ambulance_coming_to_a_campus_near_you/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/03/condom_ambulance_coming_to_a_campus_near_you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
