<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Reproductive Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/reproductive_rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:42:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Do millennials care about abortion?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nancy Keenan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NARAL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an exit interview, NARAL's president tells Salon it's time a new generation leads. But she's not sure they will]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the eve of Roe v. Wade's 40th anniversary, NARAL Pro-Choice America president Nancy Keenan, 60, announced she would celebrate by stepping down and handing the reins to a younger generation -- the same one she had been <a href="http://www.blogforchoice.com/archives/2010/04/nancy-keenan-re-1.html">arguing</a> for years lacks the pro-choice intensity and commitment of her own.</p><p>Formed originally to repeal abortion bans before Roe, NARAL is now most closely associated with lobbying on the federal and state level, and for its close ties to the Democratic Party. Keenan's departure after eight years follows an election cycle when Democrats didn't apologize for being pro-choice -- and won.</p><p>This last election year also featured unprecedented public mobilization, across generations, on issues around abortion, birth control and rape. Two men, Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock, most closely associated with a total abortion ban lost Senate bids they'd seemed poised to win. Akin, too, came from a House of Representatives where antiabortion and anti-family planning legislating had seemed like a full-time job, but whose actual legislative victories have been few.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/do_millennials_care_about_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas&#8217; abortion drug bill: More side effects and higher costs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/texas_abortion_drug_bill_more_side_effects_and_higher_costs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/texas_abortion_drug_bill_more_side_effects_and_higher_costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Independent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lawmakers are pushing outdated FDA rules on abortion drugs, worrying health care advocates and medical experts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A GOP lawmaker is looking to make Texas the latest state to restrict the use of abortion medications in a way that some experts warn could increase the drugs’ side effects while making them more expensive.</p><p><a href="http://www.americanindependent.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/TheAmericanIndependent.jpg" alt="The American Independent" align="left" /></a></p><p>Anti-abortion activists and legislators can’t enact an outright ban on abortion-inducing drugs like mifepristone (formerly known as RU-486). Instead, they have sought to force doctors to strictly adhere to U.S. Food and Drug Administration guidelines that appear to be significantly out of step with the current scientific understanding of how the medications should be used.</p><p>Lawmakers have passed abortion drug restrictions in Arizona and Ohio, overcoming legal challenges. The Oklahoma Supreme Court recently <a href="http://jurist.org/paperchase/2012/12/oklahoma-high-court-strikes-down-state-abortion-laws.php" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">ruled</a> that similar legislation in that state was unconstitutional. A North Dakota bill is currently tied up in litigation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/texas_abortion_drug_bill_more_side_effects_and_higher_costs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/texas_abortion_drug_bill_more_side_effects_and_higher_costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right wing falsely claims Planned Parenthood encouraged hiding abuse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/right_wing_falsely_claims_planned_parenthood_encouraged_hiding_abuse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/right_wing_falsely_claims_planned_parenthood_encouraged_hiding_abuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 22:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Domestic abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[right wing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13118451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives are outraged over a video they claim encourages abuse victims to cover up bruises]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The war on Planned Parenthood continued today with the right wing's trumped-up outrage over a video that they claim encourages domestic abuse victims to cover up their bruises with make-up.</p><p>It began after Planned Parenthood posted a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-XHPHRlWZk">video</a> called "How to look your best the morning after" on one of its Facebook pages. The video, produced by a London-based domestic abuse hotline, features a woman giving tips on how to cover up bruises and other signs of domestic abuse. At the end, it says:</p><blockquote> <blockquote><p>65% of women who suffer domestic violence keep it hidden.</p> <p>Don't cover it up.</p> <p>Share this and help someone speak out.</p></blockquote> </blockquote><p>But following an article <a href="http://www.lifenews.com/2012/12/06/planned-parenthood-shows-teens-how-to-hide-a-beating-with-makeup/">called</a> "Is Planned Parenthood Showing Teens How to Hide a Beating With Makeup?" that appeared on the anti-abortion site LifeNews.com, right-wing activists accused Planned Parenthood of advising women to hide abuse.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/right_wing_falsely_claims_planned_parenthood_encouraged_hiding_abuse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/07/right_wing_falsely_claims_planned_parenthood_encouraged_hiding_abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OB-GYNs: Birth control pills should be sold over the counter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/obgyns_birth_control_pills_should_be_sold_over_the_counter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/obgyns_birth_control_pills_should_be_sold_over_the_counter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2012 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13106661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nation's largest group of OB-GYNs endorses efforts to make the pill more accessible]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No prescription or doctor’s exam needed: The nation’s largest group of obstetricians and gynecologists says birth control pills should be sold over the counter, like condoms.</p><p>The surprise opinion this week from these gatekeepers of contraception could boost longtime efforts by women’s advocates to make the pill more accessible.</p><p>But no one expects the pill to be sold without a prescription any time soon: A company would have to seek government permission first, and it’s not clear if any are considering it. Plus there are big questions about what such a move would mean for many women’s wallets if it were no longer covered by insurance.</p><p>Still, momentum may be building.</p><p>Already, anyone 17 or older doesn’t need to see a doctor before buying the morning-after pill — a higher-dose version of regular birth control that can prevent pregnancy if taken shortly after unprotected sex. Earlier this year, the Food and Drug Administration held a meeting to gather ideas about how to sell regular oral contraceptives without a prescription, too.</p><p>Now the influential American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists is declaring it’s safe to sell the pill that way.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/obgyns_birth_control_pills_should_be_sold_over_the_counter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/24/obgyns_birth_control_pills_should_be_sold_over_the_counter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-wing Christians didn&#8217;t always hate women</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/right_wing_christians_didnt_always_hate_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/right_wing_christians_didnt_always_hate_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A look at a 1978 study document reveals their war on reproductive rights is newer than you might think]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> In the autumn of 1978 the Washington Association of Churches and the Washington State Catholic Conference jointly published a <a href="http://awaypoint.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/abortion-an-ecumenical-study-document-autumn-1978/" target="_blank">six-page pamphlet</a> they called “Abortion: An Ecumenical Study Document.” Their work offers a fascinating snapshot of Christian thinking at the time and raises some equally fascinating questions about what, exactly, has happened in the last 35 years.</p><p>The pamphlet does not contain a position statement. Quite the opposite, in fact. From the beginning, the authors explain that such an agreement is impossible: "Clearly there is no Christian position on abortion, for here real values conflict with each other, and Christian persons who seek honestly to be open to God’s call still find themselves disagreeing profoundly."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/right_wing_christians_didnt_always_hate_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/17/right_wing_christians_didnt_always_hate_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Religion&#8221; keeps a woman from getting a lifesaving abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/religion_keeps_a_woman_from_getting_a_life_saving_abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/religion_keeps_a_woman_from_getting_a_life_saving_abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2012 16:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-lifers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enda Kenny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ireland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Galway]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13072675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Galway hospital is under investigation for refusing to offer necessary treatment to a woman having a miscarriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's your horrible, heartbreaking reminder for today, world: When religion guides your government and reproductive rights are denied, women die.</p><p>Savita Halappanavar, a 31-year-old dentist living in Galway, was 17 weeks pregnant when she appeared at her University Hospital on Oct. 21, complaining of pain. Doctors there determined that she was miscarrying, but would not remove the fetus because it still had a heartbeat. Her husband, Praveen Halappanavar, told reporters this week that the hospital staff informed the couple that "This is a Catholic country." Mr. Praveen who came to Ireland from India, told the staff, <a href="http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2012/1114/1224326575203.html">"I am neither Irish nor Catholic," but they said they couldn't do anything. </a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/religion_keeps_a_woman_from_getting_a_life_saving_abortion/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/14/religion_keeps_a_woman_from_getting_a_life_saving_abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>113</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Embattled antiabortion forces hope to pull it out for Romney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/embattled_pro_lifers_hope_to_pull_it_out_for_romney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/embattled_pro_lifers_hope_to_pull_it_out_for_romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 16:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[choice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Abortion opponents have had a lousy campaign, but they think they might be able to deliver Romney a key swing state]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Ohio over the weekend, an antiabortion protester <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/protesters-removed-obama-rally-shouting-during-speech-021402287--election.html">interrupted</a> an Obama event by shouting and holding a sign, upside down, that read, "This moral wrong should never be a constitutional right!" He was escorted out, and Obama made a joke about sports fans being peeved at a loss. But if you believe right-to-lifers, the man represented more than an isolated incident.</p><p>After years of public-relations and legislative wins, the anti-choice movement is sounding unusually defensive lately. All indications are that they've driven a lot of women into the Obama camp, further widening the much-discussed gender gap, and adopting the movement's aims has possibly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/will_stances_on_women_cost_gop_the_senate/">cost</a> Republicans the Senate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/embattled_pro_lifers_hope_to_pull_it_out_for_romney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/embattled_pro_lifers_hope_to_pull_it_out_for_romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tina Fey says Todd Akin is confusing &#8220;legitimate rape&#8221; with &#8220;competitive gymnastics&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/tina_fey_says_todd_akin_is_confusing_legitimate_rape_with_competitive_gymnastics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/tina_fey_says_todd_akin_is_confusing_legitimate_rape_with_competitive_gymnastics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13051797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The comedian and "30 Rock" star slammed the congressman's outrageous comment at a dinner Wednesday night]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During her speech at last night's Center for Reproductive Rights' Inaugural Gala, comedian Tina Fey addressed Missouri senate hopeful Todd Akin's "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/19/todd_akin_legitimate_rape_stops_pregnancy/">legitimate rape</a>" comment, joining a slew of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/daily_show_co_creator_lizz_winstead_launches_lady_parts_justice/">vocal</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/sarah_silverman_want_to_vote_this_year_get_a_gun/">funny ladies</a> who have spoken out against the GOP's perceived <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/30/war_on_women_isnt_over/">war on women</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Todd Akin claims that women can't really get pregnant from a legitimate rape because the body secretes hormones. Now I can't even finish this sentence without getting dumber; it's making me dumber when I say it—but it's something about the body not being able to get pregnant when it's under physical stress. Mr. Akin, I think you are confusing the phrase 'legitimate rape' with the phrase 'competitive gymnastics.'"</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/tina_fey_says_todd_akin_is_confusing_legitimate_rape_with_competitive_gymnastics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/tina_fey_says_todd_akin_is_confusing_legitimate_rape_with_competitive_gymnastics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the right plans to overturn Roe v. Wade</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/how_the_right_plans_to_overturn_roe_v_wade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/how_the_right_plans_to_overturn_roe_v_wade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruth Bader Ginsburg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13050253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Slowly but surely, a Romney presidency would lay the groundwork to ban abortion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In January, two major events will take place within a day of each other: Roe v. Wade, the Supreme Court decision guaranteeing women the right to an abortion, will turn 40, and a president will be sworn in who will likely determine the 1973 ruling's fate. And if that president is Mitt Romney, anyone who cares about access to a safe and legal abortion should be very worried.</p><p>Here's what's important to know about the right's plan for Roe: It will be slow, and it will be indirect -- to avoid a backlash -- but the inexorable goal is to overturn it and ban abortion wherever possible. With an eye toward the court's oldest member, women's rights pioneer Ruth Bader Ginsburg, antiabortion activists would be counting on a President Romney to appoint one or more justices who would upset the fragile 5-4 balance that currently maintains the federal right to an abortion. In the meantime, they've been working hard to lay the groundwork to get a case before the Court that would allow justices to revisit, and possibly overturn, Roe.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/how_the_right_plans_to_overturn_roe_v_wade/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/how_the_right_plans_to_overturn_roe_v_wade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What &#8220;health of the mother&#8221; means</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/what_health_of_the_mother_means/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/what_health_of_the_mother_means/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ovarian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro-choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13049032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When cancer was suspected during my pregnancy, I faced a decision no woman wants -- and few politicians understand]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twelve weeks into my pregnancy, my spouse and I were delighted to see our “bean” on ultrasound. We thrilled to the sight of a four-chambered squeezing heart, an enormous head, and tiny, thrashing limbs. When the technician glimpsed an unusual growth on my ovary, we barely paid attention. Only a biopsy could determine what those bulbous shadows in the ultrasound were, but the doctor explained it was either a benign cyst (very likely) or cancer (very unlikely). The chances that the biopsy would result in miscarriage were slightly greater than the odds that the growth would threaten my health if left alone. Buoyed by the doctor’s assurances that the baby looked great, we decided the biopsy was a bad bet.</p><p>At the ultrasound eight weeks later, we laughed when we found out the baby was a girl. Her older sister was vibrating in anticipation of learning her sibling’s gender and entirely unprepared to accept the possibility of a little brother. The ultrasound technician found nothing troubling when she scanned the baby’s anatomy. Turning her attention to my ovaries, though, she saw a black circle that she couldn’t interpret. When they told me I could get dressed before the doctor came to talk to us, my spouse and I exchanged an anxious look: They never let you put your pants back on. The cyst on my ovary had grown significantly, it seemed, and now they thought they saw another growth on the other ovary, developments that could put my health and the baby’s at risk.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/what_health_of_the_mother_means/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/what_health_of_the_mother_means/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s not just forced ultrasound: Abortion rights under assault</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/its_not_just_forced_ultrasound_abortion_rights_under_assault/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/its_not_just_forced_ultrasound_abortion_rights_under_assault/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Planned Parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13046230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year, some 1,100 bills targeted reproductive rights -- and 135 passed in 36 states. The cost? Women's health]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A young girl in a green tank top lies on the examination table in a stark exam room in a Houston clinic. Her pink toenails dangle below<strong> </strong>the sterile covering draped over her thighs. The doctor inserts a probe between her legs and the two watch a grainy blob blossom on a sonogram screen suspended below the room’s industrial fluorescent lights. He gives a state-mandated description of the fetus: almost exactly seven weeks, he says, “nice and early.” She is well within the time frame for an abortion pill, rather than surgery.</p><p>The doctor, an avuncular, silver-haired man who's been providing abortions, in the words of one colleague, “pretty much since Roe v. Wade,” turns the screen toward her and traces the outline of her uterus and the embryo, while the girl looks on blankly. He plays the heartbeat, which rises from the machine in a loud, shrill electronic pulse. The ritual, which is repeated several times a day at this Planned Parenthood in Houston and in clinics across the state, is mandated by a <a href="http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/02/08/10355099-texas-begins-enforcing-strict-anti-abortion-sonogram-law?lite">new Texas law</a> designed to intensify the experience of abortion — to impress upon a woman, with images and sounds, the sense that she's about to terminate a living thing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/its_not_just_forced_ultrasound_abortion_rights_under_assault/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/its_not_just_forced_ultrasound_abortion_rights_under_assault/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ladies&#8217; night</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/ladies_night_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/ladies_night_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13042836</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At last, the robust advocacy for women that Obama supporters were dreaming of in a debate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lilly Ledbetter. Planned Parenthood. Contraceptive coverage as "not just a health issue; it’s an economic issue for women." No one could say President Obama wasn't making a direct approach to women, the one his allies have been begging him to make. He might have just handed the mic to Sandra Fluke -- or Ledbetter herself.</p><p>And Romney? He had "binders full of women" that became an instant meme for Obama's re-energized voting base, and he blamed single parents -- women, really -- for gun violence.</p><p>The inevitable question about women came, somewhat surprisingly, in the form of a query about the wage gap. Obama was asked by an "undecided voter," "What new ways do you intend to rectify the inequalities in the workplace, specifically regarding females making only 72 percent of what their male counterparts earn?" (Voters who care about inequality are historically torn!) That gave him the chance to talk, more energetically than he did in the last debate, about his grandmother and the discrimination she suffered, and of signing the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/ladies_night_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/ladies_night_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antiabortion movement has a referendum problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/anti_abortion_movement_has_a_referendum_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/anti_abortion_movement_has_a_referendum_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13034158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nationally, the ballot measure no longer looks like an effective weapon to limit reproductive rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The movement to classify fertilized eggs as people has hit a speed bump: "Personhood" won't be on a single ballot this election, in a year with very few reproductive rights-related referenda at all. Anyone hoping that abortion would be used as a wedge issue to turn out so-called values voters for Republicans will have to look to congressional races and the presidential campaign, where reproductive rights have been unusually prominent.</p><p>This is not how it was supposed to work for the Colorado-based movement behind the Personhood push, which has been defeated twice in its home state and a third time in Mississippi. At the time that a petition drive <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/the_next_front_in_the_abortion_wars_birth_control/">succeeded</a> in Mississippi for the 2011 ballot, there was reason to believe that the most conservative state in the union would start making Personhood look like a viable strategy for banning abortion, state by state, and somehow forcing the Supreme Court to consider a new abortion-rights paradigm. That didn't happen. After a campaign that brought grass-roots and national mobilization, focusing on "unintended consequences" involving birth control and infertility, 58 percent of Mississippi voters rejected the measure. This year, the Personhood movement hasn't even been able to get on the ballot in its own state, because so many of its signatures were disqualified. (Antiabortion forces are <a href="http://www.coloradostatesman.com/content/993755-personhood-proponents-file-suit-get-year%3Fs-ballot">fighting</a> that call in court, but Colorado's ballots have already been <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_21521018">printed</a>.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/anti_abortion_movement_has_a_referendum_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/anti_abortion_movement_has_a_referendum_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#8217;s abortion Etch-A-Sketch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/mitts_abortion_etch_a_sketch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/mitts_abortion_etch_a_sketch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 03:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13035486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney finds new ways to be "multiple-choice" on abortion ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a new way for Mitt Romney to express an ever-contorted position on abortion rights: “There’s no legislation with regards to abortion that I’m familiar with that would become part of my agenda,” he told the Des Moines Register today. Not long afterward, there was an apparent reversal, with his campaign spokeswoman <a href="https://twitter.com/KatrinaTrinko/status/255815438695559168">telling</a> the National Review's Katrina Trinko that Romney would "of course support legislation aimed at providing greater protections for life."  This may not have been an error at all; it may be a semi-clumsy entry in Romney's long history of telling people what he thinks they want to hear, even if it contradicts what he said before. What's clear is how blatantly false the statement is on the facts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/mitts_abortion_etch_a_sketch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/mitts_abortion_etch_a_sketch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Daily Show&#8221; co-creator Lizz Winstead launches Lady Parts Justice</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/daily_show_co_creator_lizz_winstead_launches_lady_parts_justice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/daily_show_co_creator_lizz_winstead_launches_lady_parts_justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2012 20:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ladypartsjustice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lizz winstead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[daily show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Parts Justice]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13031563</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The site is an effort to mobilize and empower citizens to speak up for women's reproductive rights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lizz Winstead is fed up with politicians legislating women's reproductive rights. And if you're Lizz Winstead, "The Daily Show" co-creator and former head writer, this usually means your hatred will fuel excellent political satire, humorous rage or both. Winstead <a href="http://boingboing.net/2012/10/05/lizz-winstead-co-creator-of-d.html">writes</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Look, it’s time to stop being polite and start asking, “What the f*ck do you think you are trying to pull here?”</p> <p>It is time to ask, “Why the f*ck are men and women who are inexcusably incompetent continually being elected into statehouses, governorships and THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS? And how the f*ck is it that <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2012/08/house-committee-science/">this asshole serves on THE SCIENCE COMMITTEE</a> of The House of Representatives?!</p> <p>ENOUGH.</p></blockquote><p>This morning, she launched <a href="http://www.ladypartsjustice.com/">Lady Parts Justice</a> (presumably a reference to the controversial <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2212062/President-Barack-Obama-Obama-scrubs-controversial-vote-like-lady-parts-depend-e-card.html">e-card</a> that went viral from the Obama campaign's Tumblr), an advocacy site and PSA that encourages fans of women to vote:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/daily_show_co_creator_lizz_winstead_launches_lady_parts_justice/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/05/daily_show_co_creator_lizz_winstead_launches_lady_parts_justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Antiabortion laws inspire abuse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/anti_abortion_laws_linked_to_provider_harassment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/anti_abortion_laws_linked_to_provider_harassment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13025948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When legislatures target clinics, so do in-your-face activists, new research shows]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"They will know your habits and routines. They know where you shop, who your friends are, what you drive, where you live," said the letter to the abortion provider. "You will be checking under your car everyday — because maybe today is the day someone places an explosive under it."</p><p>Mila Means hadn't even begun to actually provide abortions in Wichita, Kan., when Angel Dillard sent her that letter last year, <a href="http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/article/Abortion-opponent-says-letter-divinely-inspired-3608456.php">claiming in court</a> that its writing was both "divinely inspired" and protected by the First Amendment. But according to a <a href="http://www.contraceptionjournal.org/article/S0010-7824(12)00093-5/abstract">new study in Contraception</a> co-authored by an abortion provider in California, Kansas' draconian state laws around reproductive rights may have encouraged Dillard.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/anti_abortion_laws_linked_to_provider_harassment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/anti_abortion_laws_linked_to_provider_harassment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kansas abortion clinic is back</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/kansas_abortion_clinic_is_back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/kansas_abortion_clinic_is_back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Brownback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kansas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R-Kan.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three years after George Tiller's murder by an anti-abortionist, his aide is picking up where her mentor left off]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the three years since abortion provider George Tiller was murdered, his clinic has sat empty, and his murderer's <a href="www.salon.com/2012/08/16/kansas_gets_even_crazier/?source=newsletter">gleeful declaration,</a> "I stopped abortion in Wichita," has remained technically true. But Julie Burkhart, who used to run Tiller's political action committee and has purchased the building to open up what will be Wichita's lone clinic, doesn't want to dwell on that too much.</p><p>"We'll get into playing their game," said Burkhart from Wichita, which has been ground zero for the abortion battle since the 1991 Summer of Mercy, when the antiabortion group Operation Rescue set up camp there. "Women cannot be intimidated or bullied to the point where we're going to go off and be these good little girls and sit in the corner and wait until our name is called. Women have a right to this healthcare, and so I think that we do have to stand up to people who are small-minded and want to oppress us."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/kansas_abortion_clinic_is_back/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/kansas_abortion_clinic_is_back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morning after pill comes to NYC schools</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/morning_after_pill_comes_to_nyc_schools/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/morning_after_pill_comes_to_nyc_schools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2012 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plan B]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13020609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this a turning point for sex ed? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more than a year now, five New York City schools have been quietly running a <a title="CBS News Plan B " href="http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/09/24/bloomberg-defends-giving-nyc-students-plan-b/" target="_blank">pilot program</a> that makes the morning after pill available to teens over the age of 14. CATCH (Connecting Adolescents to Comprehensive Health) -- believed to be the first program of its kind in the nation -- enables teens to access the full range of their reproductive choices, without parental notification, in the event of unwanted pregnancy. The program recently expanded to 13 schools -- and some officials are pushing to <a title="New York City Plan B " href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/york-city-plan-contraception-teens-school/story?id=17310468#.UGC1_xikuOU" target="_blank">implement it citywide</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/morning_after_pill_comes_to_nyc_schools/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/24/morning_after_pill_comes_to_nyc_schools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How choice won</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/winning_the_abortion_battle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/winning_the_abortion_battle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13018000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Feminist pioneers built the road to Roe with a decades-long strategy centered on creating a right to privacy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In their pursuit of liberty and equality in the marketplace, women’s advocates challenged conventional views of motherhood and the divide between public and private life in America. The women’s movement exposed the male-breadwinner model of the economy as a fiction, and women from all social ranks fought for new economic arrangements and cultural norms. In many respects, they succeeded; in some, they failed. Women gained new freedoms in the marketplace, but feminists did not fully resolve the dilemmas of motherhood or win political support for new initiatives to support it. Nor did they harmonize the interests of different groups of women. A similar story accounts for the successes and failures women met when they challenged, at the same time and with equal commitment, another dimension of American life that many considered not just deleterious but cruel and repugnant: their lack of control over their own bodies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/winning_the_abortion_battle/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/winning_the_abortion_battle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peggy Noonan is wrong about your birth control</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/peggy_noonan_is_wrong_about_your_birth_control/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/peggy_noonan_is_wrong_about_your_birth_control/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Noonan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Fluke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13010493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Controlling one's fertility <em>is</em> an economic issue. Why can't conservatives get that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peggy Noonan recently magnanimously <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/declarations.html">pronounced</a> Sandra Fluke "not, as Rush Limbaugh oafishly, bullyingly said, a slut. She is a ninny, a narcissist, and a fool."  Why? Because "she really does think — and her party apparently thinks — that in a spending crisis with trillions in debt and many in need, in a nation in existential doubt as to its standing and purpose, in a time when parents struggle to buy the good sneakers for the kids so they're not embarrassed at school ... that in <em>that </em>nation the great issue of the day, and the appropriate focus of our concern, is making other people pay for her birth-control pills."</p><p>Since Noonan has a sizable platform and this apparently needs to be said roughly once a week, a quick review: Controlling one's fertility is an economic issue. So is the overall cost and provision of healthcare through private insurance -- paid for by "other people's" money, your money, your employer's, in a pool to lower risk, which is how it largely works in this country. Unintended pregnancy (and ovarian cysts, in the case of Fluke's testimony) still costs that pool far more than preventing that unintended pregnancy.  (As for "a nation in existential doubt as to its standing and purpose," such doubt must hit home for the ever-rambling Noonan.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/peggy_noonan_is_wrong_about_your_birth_control/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/peggy_noonan_is_wrong_about_your_birth_control/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>