<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Republican National Convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/republican_national_convention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:43:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Clint Eastwood on &#8220;invisible Obama&#8221;: &#8220;You know, I&#8217;m an odd person&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/clint_eastwood_on_invisible_obama_you_know_im_an_odd_person/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/clint_eastwood_on_invisible_obama_you_know_im_an_odd_person/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clint Eastwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13195171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["One thing about getting into the senior status of life, like I am, you don't really care," Eastwood said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clint Eastwood doesn't care if you think he's odd because of his "invisible Obama" routine at the 2012 Republican National Convention. "Seemed odd at the time. But, you know, I'm an odd person," he said.</p><p>In an interview with CNBC, Eastwood spoke about the attention surrounding his speech, in which he addressed a chair with an invisible President Obama. "One thing about getting into the senior status of life, like I am, you don't really care," he joked. "You just say what you say and then you get away with it."</p><p>Watch:</p><p><object id="cnbcplayer" width="400" height="225" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="quality" value="best" /><param name="scale" value="noscale" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="salign" value="lt" /><param name="flashVars" value="endTime=000" /><param name="src" value="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/3000146803/code/cnbcplayershare" /><param name="pluginspage" value="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" /><param name="flashvars" value="endTime=000" /><embed id="cnbcplayer" width="400" height="225" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/3000146803/code/cnbcplayershare" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" quality="best" scale="noscale" wmode="transparent" salign="lt" flashvars="endTime=000" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/clint_eastwood_on_invisible_obama_you_know_im_an_odd_person/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/clint_eastwood_on_invisible_obama_you_know_im_an_odd_person/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House bill ends funding of party conventions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/house_bill_ends_funding_of_party_conventions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/house_bill_ends_funding_of_party_conventions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Cole]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13016751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The government has spent around $224 million on the conventions since 1976]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Republicans and Democrats on Wednesday came together on at least one way to reduce government spending — by eliminating federal assistance for the two parties' increasingly expensive and stage-managed presidential conventions.</p><p>The vote was 310-95.</p><p>Rep. Tom Cole, R-Okla, who sponsored the legislation, says the government has spent about $224 million on the quadrennial gatherings of party faithful since 1976, when in the post-Watergate era it was considered a way to reduce the influence of money in politics.</p><p>He says this year federal assistance for the two conventions was about $35 million, slightly more than 20 percent of the total costs as the parties turn to private donors to pay for the lavish events. In 1980 federal grants paid for nearly 95 percent of convention costs.</p><p>"There's no need to be writing checks to the Democratic Party and the Republican Party," Cole said. "Clearly it's an idea whose time has come and gone."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/house_bill_ends_funding_of_party_conventions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/20/house_bill_ends_funding_of_party_conventions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Mexico governor backs away from Romney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/nm_governor_backs_away_from_romney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/nm_governor_backs_away_from_romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susana Martinez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[47 percent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13016055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After speaking at the RNC, Susana Martinez distances herself from Romney's "47 percent" comments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican governor of New Mexico told reporters that "that safety net is a good thing," breaking with Mitt Romney's comments deriding the "47 percent" he claimed are overly dependent on government.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/09fd152ea82947188209a127d9fa704b/NM--Romney-Video-Martinez">AP reports</a> that Susana Martinez, who spoke at the Republican National Convention, also said in the press conference that New Mexico has a lot of people living at at poverty line, "but they count just as much as anybody else."</p><p>"It doesn't matter what economic level you come from (or) what kind of jobs you have," she said. "I urge everyone ... that 47 percent, the middle class and the upper class to all get out on Election Day."</p><p>[slide_show id=13015078]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/nm_governor_backs_away_from_romney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/19/nm_governor_backs_away_from_romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ryan: The lyin&#8217; king</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/the_lyin_king/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/the_lyin_king/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13008310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The definitive list of the V.P. candidate's untruths, beginning with his epically error-filled RNC speech]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney pollster Neil Newhouse recently said that the Romney campaign is “not going to let our campaign be dictated by fact checkers.” If the past few weeks are any indication, Paul Ryan is sticking pretty close to that strategy. Here are his most recent lies, going back to his <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/paul-ryan-convention-speech-media-backlash.php">universally</a> fact-checked Republican National Convention speech. Come back: We’ll update throughout the rest of the campaign.</p><p><strong>10.</strong> "I voted for the Budget Control Act. But the Obama Administration proposed $478 billion in defense cuts. We don’t agree with that, our budget rejected that, and then on top of that is another $500 billion in defense cuts in the sequester." <strong>Truth:</strong> Ryan has been doing back flips to explain why he has been criticizing the Democrats for the $600 million "sequestration" cuts that will automatically go into effect if there's no budget compromise by December. Ryan, in fact, <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/09/09/816861/ryan-i-didnt-vote-for-the-defense-cuts-i-voted-for/">voted for</a> those cuts. The sequestration cuts, along with $487 million in other defense cuts, were both a part of the Budget Control Act. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/understanding-the-battle-over-the-looming-defense-cuts/2012/09/10/3ba236ac-fb9c-11e1-b153-218509a954e1_blog.html"> (September 9, 2012)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/the_lyin_king/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/the_lyin_king/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/quote_of_the_day_30/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/quote_of_the_day_30/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 22:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13004888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What's "important" to Mitt Romney]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney got attacked by DNC speakers for not directly mentioning the troops during his speech accepting the nomination. In an interview with Fox News, Bret Baier asked Romney whether he regrets the omission. Romney <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tVPscytI3DI&amp;feature=player_embedded">explained</a>:</p><p>"I only regret you're repeating it day in and day out. When you give a speech you don't go through a laundry list, you talk about the things that you think are important and I described in my speech, my commitment to a strong military unlike the president's decision to cut our military."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/quote_of_the_day_30/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/quote_of_the_day_30/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats&#8217; truth vs. GOP lies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/democrats_truth_vs_gop_lies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/democrats_truth_vs_gop_lies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fact checking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13004359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Republicans' blatant dishonesty in Tampa, Democrats hew toward truth and win the fact-checking wars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>The speakers at the DNC did plenty of things at their convention: explaining the economy President Obama inherited and the steps he took to turn it around, standing up for the rights of voters and women and gay people and immigrants, and outlining a clear vision of America based on the fundamental idea that we're all in it together.</p> <p>But there's one notable thing speakers at the DNC barely did: lie.</p> </div><p>Speaker after speaker stood up to praise the president's record and critique Mitt Romney's rhetoric with the sort of straightforward honesty that Americans should expect from political campaigns.  That’s not to say the campaign didn’t spin the facts.  Every political campaign massages the truth toward its own advantage and the Obama campaign is no different. But unlike Republicans who spouted known lie after known lie at their convention, pretty much every assertion at the DNC can be traced to some kernel of truth.</p><p>When, in his DNC speech, the president <a href="http://wapo.st/OsQ3nB">accused</a> Mitt Romney of wanting to hand over Social Security to Wall Street, while it’s true that the Romney campaign has denied this agenda currently, the fact is both Romney and Paul Ryan <a href="http://bit.ly/OsQdeR" target="_blank">supported</a> privatizing Social Security in the past.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/democrats_truth_vs_gop_lies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/democrats_truth_vs_gop_lies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eastwood explains why he spoke to the chair</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/eastwood_explains_why_he_spoke_to_the_chair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/eastwood_explains_why_he_spoke_to_the_chair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clint Eastwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13004399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clint Eastwood on his RNC speech and the Obama "hoax"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clint Eastwood has <em>finally</em> spoken out about his memorable RNC speech. His take: "Mission accomplished."</p><p>“I had three points I wanted to make,” Eastwood told <a href="http://www.pineconearchive.com/120907-1.html">the Carmel Pine Cone</a>, a paper from the city where he once served as mayor. “That not everybody in Hollywood is on the left, that Obama has broken a lot of the promises he made when he took office, and that the people should feel free to get rid of any politician who’s not doing a good job. But I didn’t make up my mind exactly what I was going to say until I said it.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/eastwood_explains_why_he_spoke_to_the_chair/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/eastwood_explains_why_he_spoke_to_the_chair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>T.C. Boyle: Older, still effortlessly cool</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/t_c_boyle_older_still_effortlessly_cool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/t_c_boyle_older_still_effortlessly_cool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Nervous Breakdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T.C. Boyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Yorker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mad Men]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13004287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The novelist dishes on politics, "Mad Men" and his next novel]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/TNB-Bug500.jpeg" alt="The Nervous Breakdown" align="left" /></a> T. Coraghessan Boyle is the author of twenty-three books of fiction, including, most recently, <em>After the Plague </em>(2001), <em>Drop City </em>(2003), <em>The Inner Circle </em>(2004), <em>Tooth and Claw</em> (2005), <em>The Human Fly</em> (2005), <em>Talk Talk</em> (2006), <em>The Women</em> (2009), <em>Wild Child</em> (2010), <em>When the Killing’s Done</em> (2011) and <em>San Miguel</em> (2012). He received a Ph.D. degree in Nineteenth Century British Literature from the University of Iowa in 1977, his M.F.A. from the University of Iowa Writers’ Workshop in 1974, and his B.A. in English and History from SUNY Potsdam in 1968. He has been a member of the English Department at the University of Southern California since 1978, where he is a Distinguished Professor of English. His work has been translated into more than two dozen foreign languages, including German, French, Italian, Dutch, Portuguese, Spanish, Russian, Hebrew, Korean, Japanese, Danish, Swedish, Norwegian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Polish, Hungarian, Bulgarian, Finnish, Farsi, Croatian, Turkish, Albanian, Vietnamese, Serbian and Slovene. His stories have appeared in most of the major American magazines, including <em>The New Yorker, Harper’s,</em> <em>Esquire, The Atlantic Monthly, Playboy, The Paris Review, GQ, Antaeus, Granta </em>and <em>McSweeney’s</em>, and he has been the recipient of a number of literary awards, including the PEN/Faulkner Prize for best novel of the year (<em>World’s End</em>, 1988); the PEN/Malamud Prize in the short story (<em>T.C. Boyle Stories</em>, 1999); and the Prix Médicis Étranger for best foreign novel in France (<em>The Tortilla Curtain</em>, 1997). He currently lives near Santa Barbara with his wife and three children.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/t_c_boyle_older_still_effortlessly_cool/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/t_c_boyle_older_still_effortlessly_cool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are we cheering for?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/obamas_convention_charade/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/obamas_convention_charade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13002725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don't let the conventions distract you from the real lesson of 2012: America is becoming increasingly undemocratic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>In 2008, the Democratic National Platform Committee spoke to the anger, pride and righteousness of civil liberties-loving Democrats. The platform proudly said that "we will ensure that law-abiding Americans of any origin, including Arab-Americans and Muslim-Americans, do not become the scapegoats of national security fears." In 2012, the Democratic National Convention dropped a <a href="http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/09/02/3496856/muslim-jumah-ends-with-disappointing.html" target="_blank">Muslim prayer service from its online calendar</a> after receiving criticism from conservative groups, and the FBI sent agents to question the Charlotte Muslim community about its event. Naturally, this year, the Democratic National Platform Committee doesn't mention Muslims or Arabs.</p> <p>Meanwhile, writer JA Meyerson, attending the convention, overheard New York delegates derisively talking about Occupy Wall Street's fixation on drones and presumed whistle-blower Bradley Manning's torture and imprisonment. This type of talk, according to one delegate, was really alienating Democrats from Occupy Wall Street, who presumably should have been functioning as a support arm to the Democratic Party.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/obamas_convention_charade/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/06/obamas_convention_charade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Viewers preferred Eastwood to Romney</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/viewers_preferred_eastwood_to_romney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/viewers_preferred_eastwood_to_romney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 18:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clint Eastwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13001787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RNC watchers liked Clint's antics better than Mitt's earnest pandering]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a Pew Research <a href="http://www.people-press.org/2012/09/05/rnc-highlights-romney-shares-top-billing-with-eastwood/">survey</a>,  RNC watchers were not very impressed by Romney's speech. Or, at least, not nearly as impressed  as they were by Clint Eastwood's. Of those asked, 20 percent said Eastwood's speech was the highlight, compared with 17 percent who preferred Romney's. Another 20 percent said there was no highlight.</p><p>Mitt did slightly better among Republicans, with 25 percent saying that his speech was the highlight compared to Eastwood's 19 percent.</p><p>Only 2 percent of overall viewers thought Chris Christie was the best part but they probably didn't ask him.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/viewers_preferred_eastwood_to_romney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/05/viewers_preferred_eastwood_to_romney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/04/quote_of_the_day_27/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/04/quote_of_the_day_27/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haley Barbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quote of the day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13001122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Haley Barbour has a very specific criticism of Chris Christie's RNC speech]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haley Barbour, the Republican power broker and former governor of Mississippi, thought Chris Christie did well in his Republican National Convention speech, but could have been better:</p><p>"While I would love for [Chris] Christie to put a hot poker to Obama’s butt," Barbour told <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-09-04/exclusive-how-karl-roves-super-pac-plays-the-senate#p1">Bloomberg Businessweek</a>. “I thought he did what he was supposed to do.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/04/quote_of_the_day_27/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/04/quote_of_the_day_27/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt vs. biz distrust</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/mitt_vs_biz_distrust/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/mitt_vs_biz_distrust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bain Capital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry S Truman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12998523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We're historically reluctant to elect business heads to the top office. Will our free-market adoration change that?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney has built his political career -- and his claim to the presidency -- on his success as a businessman. His experience at Bain Capital, the Republican nominee insists, has given him a grasp of the private economy and a skill at job creation that uniquely qualify him for high office in these troubled times. In his acceptance speech Thursday night at the Republican National Convention, Romney went even further, not just asserting the value of his own entrepreneurial experience, but also declaring that the lack of experience running a business practically disqualified his opponent. President Obama, Romney said, “took office without the basic qualification that most Americans have and one that was essential to his task. He had almost no experience working in a business.”</p><p>Romney’s suggestion that only business owners should occupy the White House was hardly surprising; it just reinforced the reverence for builders of small businesses manifested in the Republican gathering in Tampa. But it is a curious claim nonetheless. For most of the nation’s history, lawyers, educators and military men have dominated the roster of American presidents. Voters often questioned the public spiritedness of business leaders, looking to the White House less to unleash the energy of the free market than to shield them against its vicissitudes. Romney’s campaign embodies a recent, and very different, model of presidential leadership.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/mitt_vs_biz_distrust/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/03/mitt_vs_biz_distrust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans want to build a time machine</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/republicans_want_to_build_a_time_machine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/republicans_want_to_build_a_time_machine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12998822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But don't be fooled: Republicans aren't just nostalgic for 1950s-style social barriers. They want to rebuild them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Among the most unvarnished sentiments expressed at the Republican Convention in Tampa this week was the disregard for the Obama campaign’s 2012 slogan, “Forward.” The derision of propulsive movement was perfectly appropriate for Republicans, who this week drew a bright, unmistakable line around a desire that has been getting ever clearer in recent months.</p><p>What the right wants, and what they tried to build for themselves in Tampa, was a time machine.</p><p>Republicans are panting for a tricked-out DeLorean that can take them back! Back in time! To a period when the power structure was fixed and comfortable, when there were no black first ladies or black camerawomen, when loud Jewish ladies were not in charge of national political parties, back to a time when only a select few – the white, the male, the straight, the Protestant – could reasonably expect to exert political or financial or social or sexual power.</p><p>The desire to chronologically reverse our nation’s history has been the undercurrent of the 2012 election cycle and its primary debates; it’s barely been disguised in the agenda of John Boehner’s House or in state legislatures around the country.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/republicans_want_to_build_a_time_machine/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/republicans_want_to_build_a_time_machine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>127</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ralph Reed rises from the ashes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/ralph_reed_rises_from_the_ashes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/ralph_reed_rises_from_the_ashes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Reed]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12999288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The evangelical and political entrepreneur has reestablished himself as a Republican power player]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the sun slowly sets over the Republican National Convention in Tampa, we settle back in the chairs that nice Mr. Eastwood just gave us and ponder some of the other oddities of the week. Like this item in the official GOP platform <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/ezra-klein/wp/2012/08/29/gop-platform-the-10-oddest-items/">pointed out by Brad Plumer</a> of <em>The Washington Post</em>:</p><p><strong><em>No minimum wage for the Mariana Islands.</em></strong><em> “The Pacific territories should have flexibility to determine the minimum wage, which has seriously restricted progress in the private sector.”</em></p><p>This caught our attention (and thanks to colleague Theresa Riley for sending) because it once again reminds us of the sordid past of evangelical and political entrepreneur Ralph Reed who, as this week’s edition of <em>Moyers &amp; Company</em> reports in detail, has emerged from the ashes of epic career fail to reestablish himself as a powerful figure in Republican politics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/ralph_reed_rises_from_the_ashes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/ralph_reed_rises_from_the_ashes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans vs. straw men</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/republicans_vs_straw_men/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/republicans_vs_straw_men/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12998769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was every reporter's challenge at the RNC: How do you engage voters when their politicians tell outright lies?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Eve ate the apple," said Kathy Berden, "and that's our lot in life."</p><p>We were sitting just outside the Tampa Bay Times Forum minutes after Mitt Romney spoke at the Republican National Convention Thursday night, and Berden, a grandmotherly delegate from Michigan, was talking about Ann Romney's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/ann_romney_love_mitt_please/">declaration</a> that women's lives are a little harder than men's. Berden agreed with Romney about that, and also, apparently, that it wasn't government's role to do anything about it. She'd told me that we'd been hearing so much this week about women because while "Democrats pander to women on reproductive rights, Republicans really respect women as joint partners."</p><p>I was surprised to hear her use the phrase "reproductive rights," which I'd never heard a conservative use. Berden blamed it on seeing Sandra Fluke on TV all the time, volunteering with a chuckle, "She's a grown woman, we shouldn't have to pay for her stupid birth control. She could cross her legs."</p><p>"To be fair," I replied, with some hesitation, "she never talked about herself. She talked about her friend who was raped, she talked about her friend who had a medical condition…"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/republicans_vs_straw_men/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/republicans_vs_straw_men/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press turns on Paul Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/press_turns_on_paul_ryan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/press_turns_on_paul_ryan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Sep 2012 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12998860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of Paul Ryan's main assets was his popularity in the media. After his dishonest speech, it may be blown]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don’t expect much of anything unexpected to come out of the conventions, and in particular the big speeches from the nominees almost always go well. And yet in Tampa this week, Paul Ryan gave a speech that may well have real, lasting and very negative consequences for the ticket.</p><p>One way to think about vice-presidential candidates is in terms of the resources they bring to a ticket. Those might include popularity in a swing state, as when Dwight Eisenhower chose Richard Nixon; ability to raise money, as when John Kennedy picked Lyndon Johnson; policy expertise to cover a nominee’s weakness, as when Gov. Ronald Reagan added foreign policy experience in George H.W. Bush; or support from an important party faction, seen in John McCain’s selection of Sarah Palin.</p><p>The idea is that any politician important enough to be considered will probably control some politically useful – and at least potentially transferable – assets.</p><p>Paul Ryan? He brought two resources to the Romney campaign. One was the enthusiastic support of conservatives. That’s something that Romney wanted to have, and it is intact after the convention. But it’s not exactly a scarce resource, because as we know the Republican Party is well-equipped to stir up support for even the most unknown candidates; just think back to the passionate embrace of the previously unknown Sage of Wasilla within hours of when she was chosen in 2008.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/press_turns_on_paul_ryan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/01/press_turns_on_paul_ryan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poor Donald Trump!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/poor_donald_trump/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/poor_donald_trump/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clint Eastwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Voight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12998788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His "big surprise" was canceled, and the GOP paid him zero attention in Tampa]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donald Trump, a television character in a 1980s-era satirical dystopian future SciFi movie, was supposed to have a big "surprise" on Monday at this week's RNC, which he wasn't invited to (he says otherwise but he is delusional), but then the Republicans were "forced" to cancel because of Hurricane Isaac. And they didn't reschedule it.</p><p>What they did make time for at the convention included a song by the guy your grandma liked on "American Idol" a few years back, a speech by former Hooters promoter Connie Mack and an old man yelling at a chair.</p><p>The old man yelling at the chair was, of course, legendary American actor and director Clint Eastwood, who was invited because I think the organizers assumed he <em>wasn't as crazy as every single other Republican celebrity,</em> but then he went and did the craziest thing of the week. (I don't think Eastwood is crazy, actually. He's just ... eccentric.)</p><p>That had to be particularly galling, for Donald. This totally unvetted rambling piece of absurdist theater got prime billing right before the nominee, but the dumb video he made was just ignored completely.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/poor_donald_trump/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/poor_donald_trump/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>68</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP gets &#8220;sensible&#8221; on immigration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/the_gops_anti_kobach/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/the_gops_anti_kobach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Kobach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Brewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Arpaio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12998601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meet the Texan who's pushing his party to moderate its stance, with surprising success]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TAMPA -- Tuesday was a good day for Republicans concerned about their party's rightward drift on immigration: The GOP officially adopted a platform that included a guest worker program for the first time its history and Russell Pearce, the sponsor of Arizona’s controversial anti-immigration law, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/29/russell_pearce_trounced/">lost by double digits</a> in a GOP primary. The two events made it “a historic day for Republicans," said Brad Bailey, a delegate from Texas who led the charge to insert the guest worker language.</p><p>In the power struggle within the Republican Party for control of the politically important and emotionally fraught issue of immigration, Bailey has positioned himself as the anti-Kris Kobach. Kobach, the Yale-educated secretary of state of Kansas, though largely unknown to the outside world, has become the party's leading voice and advocate on immigration. He has advised Mitt Romney's campaign, helped write the hardline immigration laws in Arizona and a half dozen other states, and succeeded in adding his own language to the party’s new platform.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/the_gops_anti_kobach/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/the_gops_anti_kobach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter King: AP has &#8220;no moral integrity&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/peter_king_ap_has_no_moral_integrity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/peter_king_ap_has_no_moral_integrity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 20:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12998724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Long Island congressman attacks the reporters who exposed the NYPD's surveillance of Muslims]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TAMPA -- In order to enter the Republican National Convention, one had to pass through multiple layers of security, which involved so many different law enforcement agencies that I literally lost count. So police issues were on my mind on Wednesday when I spotted Rep. Peter King, the cranky <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/09/us/politics/09king.html">Irish Republican Army apologist</a> from Long Island. I asked if he thought there was any merit to arguments leveled -- by both the <a href="http://www.thenation.com/article/164501/paramilitary-policing-seattle-occupy-wall-street">left</a> and <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/radley-balko/police-militarization-use-of-force-swat-raids_b_1123848.html">right</a> alike -- that police departments across the country have been excessively federalized and/or militarized, with the Tampa security situation being a prime example.</p><p>"No," King stated plainly. "Obviously, we always have to be looking out at all times that the police maintain their proper role. But I think the Department of Homeland Security, and the police I deal with -- whether it's the FBI or the New York City Police Department -- no, I think civil liberties are being protected. Privacy is being protected. And considering the nature of the threat against us, I would say the police are remarkably restrained."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/peter_king_ap_has_no_moral_integrity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/peter_king_ap_has_no_moral_integrity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eastwood&#8217;s imaginary friend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/eastwoods_imaginary_friends/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/eastwoods_imaginary_friends/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2012 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clint Eastwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12998217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC took an absurdist turn last night. Film history offers some possible explanations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this really happening, and did the president just <a href="https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/241392153148915712">answer</a> meme for meme? Questions I asked myself last night while feeling bad about making fun of Clint Eastwood arguing with a chair, because Clint Eastwood reminds me of my grandfather, another crusty old Republican who loved westerns and believed he was surrounded by idiots 99 percent of the time. Would you let your grandpa get on TV and yell at a chair? And yet, perhaps this bizarre, ill-rehearsed moment was a stroke of staging genius. Did Eastwood actually see someone in that chair? Some shadow companion, perhaps, who appears as a result of trauma and slowly becomes a private antagonist that could only be defeated by a grand gesture? There is precedent.</p><p><strong>The Donnie Darko Explanation</strong></p><p>The president appears to Eastwood yesterday as a monstrous, soft-spoken bunny. He lures Clint out onto the streets of Tampa (“closer, closer”) and tells him the world will end in 28 days, six hours, 42 minutes, 12 seconds. With nothing to lose, Clint lets the president lead him to the RNC stage, and now Clint will spend the next month committing increasingly desperate acts before ending it all in an epic confrontation with a guy in a rabbit suit (college football season is upon us, mascots beware).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/eastwoods_imaginary_friends/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/31/eastwoods_imaginary_friends/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
