<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Republican Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/republican_party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 04:25:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s war on women has a new face: Marsha Blackburn</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/gops_war_on_women_has_a_new_face_marsha_blackburn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/gops_war_on_women_has_a_new_face_marsha_blackburn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Marsha Blackburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Trent Franks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House abortion ban]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pay equity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The woman who says women “don’t want” equal pay laws sells the House abortion ban as "saving the lives of women"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tennessee Rep. Marsha Blackburn happily stepped up and took over the House GOP’s post-20 week abortion ban from Trent Franks this week, after Franks made his ignorant comments about the bill not needing an exception for rape victims, because "the incidence of pregnancy from rape is very low." Franks certainly didn’t help the party with its post Todd Akin outreach to women voters.</p><p>Blackburn would seem to be an odd choice to help Republicans improve their popularity with women. On “Meet the Press” just two weeks ago she made headlines by insisting women “don’t want” equal pay laws (she of course voted against the Lilly Ledbetter fair pay act.) Now she’s insisting that the House GOP’s anti-abortion bill is meant to help women, too. While it now includes an exception for victims of rape and incest, it will only apply to women who have reported those crimes to police, when a majority of survivors do not.</p><p>On MSNBC Tuesday morning, Blackburn tried to explain to an incredulous Craig Melvin that the measure is designed to help women, because it will “rid our society of these perpetrators who carry out these crimes, many times repeatedly.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/gops_war_on_women_has_a_new_face_marsha_blackburn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/gops_war_on_women_has_a_new_face_marsha_blackburn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>159</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s hot plan: Cut food for poor people!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/food_stamps_fight_and_the_politics_of_cruelty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/food_stamps_fight_and_the_politics_of_cruelty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Stamps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cruel party insists on massive SNAP cuts in farm bill and push for immigration reform to be as harsh as possible]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House, bless them, <a href="http://bigstory.ap.org/article/white-house-threatens-veto-house-farm-bill">has threatened to veto the Farm Bill</a> if Congress passes the House version of the legislation, which cuts $2 billion a year from the food stamp program, instead of the Senate version, which contains a mere $400 million in annual cuts.</p><p>The White House would prefer, if we are in a cutting mood, to cut direct subsidies to farmers and crop insurance, two longtime mainstays of the farm bill that have basically totally fucked up our entire food system for decades but that also have made a few giant food companies quite rich. Here is how House Republicans made their bill:</p><blockquote><p>The bill, which costs nearly $100 billion a year, would save a total of about $4 billion annually, including the food stamp cuts. It would eliminate some subsidies while creating others, raising subsidy levels for several crops. It would expand the current crop insurance program and also create a new type of crop insurance that would kick in sooner than the paid insurance farmers have now.</p></blockquote><p>Good one, guys. Good policy, good attempt at deficit reduction, good governing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/food_stamps_fight_and_the_politics_of_cruelty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/food_stamps_fight_and_the_politics_of_cruelty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>240</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marco Rubio’s awful day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/marco_rubio%e2%80%99s_awful_day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/marco_rubio%e2%80%99s_awful_day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gang of eight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He won’t back his own bill, an aide insults American workers, and his angling looks wishy-washy, not savvy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was big news that Sen. Marco Rubio wouldn’t say he backed his own immigration reform bill on ABC’s “This Week” Sunday. He told Jon Karl it was “an excellent starting point,” oddly passive language for someone who’s a co-sponsor. Obviously Rubio is keeping his promise to the right to push for even tougher border control in the final bill, but his wishy-washy response didn’t seem leader-like.</p><p>Luckily or not, Rubio’s wimpy reply was overshadowed by reaction to a deeply reported New Yorker piece by Ryan Lizza that placed the Florida Republican at the center of the "Gang of Eight" negotiations. It featured a choice quote dissing American workers from an anonymous Rubio aide, explaining why his boss backed the Chamber of Commerce over the AFL-CIO when it came to a guest worker agreement (they eventually compromised): “There are American workers who, for lack of a better term, can’t cut it. There shouldn’t be a presumption that every American worker is a star performer. There are people who just can’t get it, can’t do it, don’t want to do it. And so you can’t obviously discuss that publicly.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/marco_rubio%e2%80%99s_awful_day/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/marco_rubio%e2%80%99s_awful_day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>148</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP plan to appeal to millennials: &#8220;Make abortion funny&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/gop_plan_to_appeal_to_millennials_make_abortion_funny/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/gop_plan_to_appeal_to_millennials_make_abortion_funny/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 15:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13327225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Young Christian-right leaders think the answer to their problems with young voters lies in more snark]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"How do you make abortion funny?" That was a key question mulled at a major conservative gathering Friday on how to make social conservatism appealing to young people, after an election where Republicans got trounced in the battle for millennial voters (who are are moving even further and further away from the Christian-right on marriage and other issues).</p><p>Abortion has to be made funny, the thinking goes, because funny sells on social media, and that's where one goes to court young people. "You can engage with sarcasm, it's hard with the abortion issue, but you have to," said Students for Life president Kristan Hawkins at a breakout panel at the Faith and Freedom Coalition Conference in Washington today on how to win millennial voters. "Unfortunately we have to, because this is the generation that we've been dealt."</p><p>As the Republican Party tries to remake itself after the 2012 election to better appeal to young people and minorities, there's been a movement to jettison issues social conservatives hold dear, especially support for "traditional marriage." But the activists at Ralph Reed's confab said absolutely not. "You've got to be pro-life, you've got be pro-marriage, or else you're not going to get our money," Hawkins said firmly.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/gop_plan_to_appeal_to_millennials_make_abortion_funny/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/gop_plan_to_appeal_to_millennials_make_abortion_funny/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>201</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP plan: Bring Dubya back!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/gop_plan_bring_dubya_back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/gop_plan_bring_dubya_back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 12:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservativism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ross Douthat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No Child Left Behind]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grover Norquist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look beneath the surface, and a hot new plan for the party's comeback is really just George W. Bush redux]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s fast becoming a cliché, but it’s nevertheless the truth: If Republicans plan to win the White House any time soon, they’re going to have to change. And that change will have to be more substantial than simply asking the Romney clan to ease up a bit on the whole public service thing, or churning out more Spanish-language campaign ads during the next election. To borrow one of the president’s favorite phrases, when it comes to an altered Republican Party, there’s got to be a “there” there. Singing some new lyrics atop the same old tune just won’t cut it. (Sorry, Senator Rubio.)</p><p>So the question is not so much whether the GOP should change but, rather, <em>how</em>? Two options commonly proffered are as follows: Republicans could follow the lead of Senators Ted Cruz and Rand Paul and push for even smaller government (I call this the “more cowbell” school of thought). Or they could look instead to the small but influential group of right-wing intellectuals claiming to offer a new path: the “conservative reformers.” The decision looks so simple. Either one step forward, or two steps back.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/gop_plan_bring_dubya_back/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/gop_plan_bring_dubya_back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s John McCain problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/gops_john_mccain_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/gops_john_mccain_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 11:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The reason he still speaks for them on foreign policy: They hate substance and literally have no other "experts"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many have noted, including Salon's Alex Pareene, that John McCain is “<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/president_mccain_declares_war/">the senator everyone in the press listens to</a>.” While this is certainly true, a key question remains: <em>Why?</em> Why is John McCain, years after his solidly defeated presidential run, a man who isn’t even the top Republican on a key committee -- a man who, truth be told, most Republicans don’t particularly like and never trusted -- the leader of the opposition on foreign affairs and national security?</p><p>Actually, it’s not just because a lot of elite reporters appear to worship the guy. Politics, like nature, isn’t all that comfortable with vacuums, and the post-policy Republican Party has plenty of enormous empty spaces when it comes to questions of public policy. John McCain’s knee-jerk invade-everyone responses may be shallow, ill-informed, and often proved wrong…but it’s something, and something almost always beats nothing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/gops_john_mccain_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/gops_john_mccain_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marco Rubio decides whether he wants to kill immigration reform or not</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/marco_rubio_decides_whether_he_wants_to_kill_immigration_reform_or_not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/marco_rubio_decides_whether_he_wants_to_kill_immigration_reform_or_not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13321595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does the conservative Florida senator still want to be instrumental in passing reform?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate has just begun the weeks-long process of debating and voting on the immigration reform bill crafted by the "Gang of Eight." <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/06/10/its_zero_hour_for_senate_immigration_bill.html">Harry Reid would like the bill passed on July 4,</a> for the rather obvious symbolism. Supporters are still confident that the bill will pass the Senate.</p><p>The best thing the bill has going for it is that <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57588418/immigration-house-senate-looking-for-common-ground/">Mitch McConnell is going to actually allow it to come to the floor.</a> (Minority Leader McConnell has veto power over most Senate business, because many  senators have convinced themselves that the founders wanted him to.) The "Gang" has four Republican members, meaning only a few more are needed in order to reach 60 votes and beat a potential filibuster. Kelly Ayotte is one Republican who's publicly announced her support for the bill.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/marco_rubio_decides_whether_he_wants_to_kill_immigration_reform_or_not/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/marco_rubio_decides_whether_he_wants_to_kill_immigration_reform_or_not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, there isn&#8217;t a GOP civil war</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/no_there_isnt_a_gop_civil_war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/no_there_isnt_a_gop_civil_war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Dukakis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Atwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1988]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Stuart Mill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Kornacki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Up with Steve Kornacki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msnbc_neg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Brady]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13319126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's the establishment, Fox News, Heritage, Rush and the Koch Bros, versus a few moderates. That's a mercy killing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s commonplace these days to suggest that a “civil war” has broken out in the Republican Party. The <em>casus belli</em> seems to consist mainly of two things: Mitt Romney’s loss to Barack Obama in last year’s presidential election, and the failure of Republicans over the last two electoral cycles to regain control of the United States Senate. It isn’t surprising, perhaps, that many Democrats attribute these events to the Republican Party’s increasingly shrill right-wing rejectionism, but apparently some Republicans believe the same thing.</p><p>About two months after Romney’s loss, Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, channeling John Stuart Mill, admonished Republicans to stop being “the stupid party.” Karl Rove, whose bona fides as a political moderate had been fairly well hidden, announced that he would form a super-PAC dedicated to the proposition that only electable -- that is, mainstream -- candidates could emerge from Republican senatorial primaries. (No second amendment solutions, witches, or divinely ordained rapes need apply.) And John Huntsman, erstwhile Governor of Utah, Ambassador to China, and 2012 Republican Presidential candidate, went so far as to endorse the formation of a third party. “Someone’s going to step up at some point and say we’ve had enough of this,” he intoned. A third party might not win, but “[it] can certainly influence the debate.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/no_there_isnt_a_gop_civil_war/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/no_there_isnt_a_gop_civil_war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>123</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dear everyone: Chris Christie is conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/dear_everyone_chris_christie_is_conservative/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/dear_everyone_chris_christie_is_conservative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 13:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13316477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: How many times do we have to explain this?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Christie in <a href="http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2013/06/major_democratic_donors_flock.html">swimming in Democratic money</a> as he runs for reelection. His Democratic opponent, Barbara Buono, is ignored by the national press and the sort of people that would usually be writing checks for the Democratic challenger to a Republican governor in a large, liberal state.</p><p>Hugging Barack Obama was maybe the best political decision New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie has ever made, and he's made some very canny ones. I'm not saying his embrace of the president following Hurricane Sandy was entirely cynical, but it was very boisterous, and it continued through last week, when Obama visited the Jersey Shore <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/29/obama_and_christie_are_still_friends_to_everyones_dismay/">and once again made nice with Christie before the national TV news cameras.</a></p><p>Here's what's odd about this Republican governor who currently seems much more popular with Democrats than national Republicans: He's quite conservative. Especially for the Northeast. That was, in fact, his original appeal, back when conservatives were thrilled about him: He's the most conservative possible successful statewide officeholder for a blue state like New Jersey.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/dear_everyone_chris_christie_is_conservative/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/dear_everyone_chris_christie_is_conservative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does Virginia hate Terry McAuliffe?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/does_virginia_hate_terry_mcauliffe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/does_virginia_hate_terry_mcauliffe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terry McAulliffe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Cuccinelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Governors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP chose a hard-liner for governor in a state that went for Obama. So why isn't the Democrat running away with it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pity Virginians. While the rest of the country is still getting over the 2012 presidential campaign, the commonwealth is heading into what promises to be a bruising 2013 gubernatorial campaign between two candidates whom voters don't particularly like much, and it will be front and center as one of the most attention-getting elections in the country.</p><p>The state voted for Obama in 2012 and 2008, and has two Democratic senators, so it should be a pretty easy pickup for Democrats, right? Not so fast. Instead, it's just a slim Democratic lead, with the big joke in Richmond being that this is a contest between two guys who cannot win. On the Republican side, this makes some sense, as they nominated Attorney General Ken Cuccinnelli, one of the most extreme conservatives in the country, in an increasingly Democratic-leaning state. So why aren't the Democrats running away with it? Is it something about Virginia, or Democratic nominee Terry McAuliffe?</p><p>"Nobody likes either of them," said Norman Leahy, a conservative analyst and the editor of the Virginia political blog <a href="http://bearingdrift.com/">BearingDrift</a>, referring to both nominees. "If the election were held today, I think you could make a strong case for 'none of the above' doing pretty well as a write-in candidate."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/does_virginia_hate_terry_mcauliffe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/does_virginia_hate_terry_mcauliffe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>College Republicans&#8217; plan for GOP rebranding: Seem tolerant!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/college_republicans_help_out_with_gop_rebanding_effort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/college_republicans_help_out_with_gop_rebanding_effort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13315475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The branch of the conservative movement that bred the party's scummiest strategists urges a softer sell]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the College Republican National Committee is releasing a report, based on a poll and focus groups, examining how and why the Republican Party lost the under-30 vote and what they could do to win it back. Spoiler: They will have to become an entirely different party with entirely different positions. Though that is sort of my interpretation of their findings. The College Republicans are still pretty sure it's primarily a problem of "messaging."</p><p>The report, <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=47D81FDF-F698-468B-A4B4-004B8005129B">according to Politico's summary</a>, covers much of the same ground as the Reince Priebus-ordered RNC report on the troubles of the Republican Party released earlier this year. Politico sums up the findings with the following bullet points:</p><blockquote><p><strong>Gay marriage:</strong> “On the ‘open-minded’ issue … [w]e will face serious difficulty so long as the issue of gay marriage remains on the table.”</p> <p><strong>Hispanics:</strong> “Latino voters … tend to think the GOP couldn’t care less about them.”</p> <p><strong>Perception of the party’s economic stance:</strong> “We’ve become the party that will pat you on your back when you make it, but won’t offer you a hand to help you get there.”</p> <p><strong>Big reason for the image problem:</strong> The “outrageous statements made by errant Republican voices.”</p> <p><strong>Words that up-for-grabs voters associate with the GOP:</strong> “The responses were brutal: closed-minded, racist, rigid, old-fashioned.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/college_republicans_help_out_with_gop_rebanding_effort/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/college_republicans_help_out_with_gop_rebanding_effort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scandals boost number of potential 2014 Republican voters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/scandals_boost_number_of_potential_2014_republican_voters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/scandals_boost_number_of_potential_2014_republican_voters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 13:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great news for the right: Equal numbers of Americans intend to vote for each party in the midterms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trifecta of political controversies that Washington is currently fixated on have finally made a dent on the polls. Now, after a few weeks of making a big fuss about three completely unrelated Obama scandals, or at least some scandalous things that happened while Obama was president, an equal number of Americans intend to vote for Republicans and for Democrats in this year's midterm elections, according to <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/midterm-elections-poll-92036.html?hp=l4">a new Quinnipiac Poll reported by Politico.</a></p><blockquote><p>When asked who they wanted to send to the House of Representatives in next year’s midterm elections, the GOP and Democratic candidate tied at 38 percent, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday. Twenty percent of those surveyed said they didn’t know or didn’t have an answer for who they would vote for. In Quinnipiac’s last two polls, released May 1 and April 3, Democrats had been leading Republicans 41-37 and 43-35, respectively.</p></blockquote><p>The unmentioned fun part is that if an equal number of votes are cast, in November 2014, for Democrats and for Republicans, that means that Republicans will win a massive wave election, easily retaining control of the House of Representatives and possibly retaking the Senate. And if that does happen no one will consider it odd or scandalous or anything.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/scandals_boost_number_of_potential_2014_republican_voters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/scandals_boost_number_of_potential_2014_republican_voters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Alex Pareene on the GOP&#8217;s scandal fetish</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/alex_pareene_on_the_gops_scandal_fetish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/alex_pareene_on_the_gops_scandal_fetish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 20:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Pareene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[92nd Street Y]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon's staff writer tells 92Y how the Republican fishing expedition is about one thing: Sunday show talking points]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this video produced by <a href="http://92yamericanconversation.org/">92nd Street Y</a>, Salon’s Alex Pareene breaks down the Republican Party's ongoing attempt to trap President Obama in "scandals"  --  and how it so often picks the wrong ones.</p><p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/PIJqDP3KeHo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/alex_pareene_on_the_gops_scandal_fetish/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/alex_pareene_on_the_gops_scandal_fetish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: Republicans are &#8220;the less credible party&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/study_republicans_are_the_less_credible_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/study_republicans_are_the_less_credible_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fact checking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PolitiFact rules GOP "false" far more often than Democrats, with Bachmann one of the worst, a new report reveals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many politicians stretch the truth or obfuscate to some degree or another --  but does one party do it more than the other? According to a new study from the Center for Media and Public Affairs at George Mason University the answer is an unequivocal yes. Parsing 100 statements evaluated by the fact-checking website PolitiFact between Obama's second inauguration and this month, the researchers found that claims from Republican officials were labeled as “false” or “pants on fire" by a 3-to-1 margin, compared to claims from Democratic officials. Conversely, half as many Republican claims were labeled “entirely true."</p><p>“While Republicans see a credibility gap in the Obama administration, PolitiFact rates Republicans as the less credible party," said CMPA president  Robert Lichter in <a href="http://www.cmpa.com/media_room_press_05_28_13.html">a press release</a>. An earlier study from the CMPA found the website rated the Romney campaign worse than the Obama campaign during the 2012 election. Not surprisingly, Michele Bachmann is one of the <a href="http://www.politifact.com/personalities/michele-bachmann/">most poorly rated</a> politicians on PolitiFact.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/study_republicans_are_the_less_credible_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/study_republicans_are_the_less_credible_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP: Party of crybabies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/25/grand_old_party_of_crybabies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/25/grand_old_party_of_crybabies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom of Speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Fluke]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13308290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans insist that you please don’t criticize their policies or insult their donors]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s time to call out a major Republican theme of how politics should be practiced in a democracy: the supposed right to be free from criticism. It may sell wonderfully inside the conservative closed-information loop, but it’s a nasty idea that sorts exceptionally badly with democratic politics.</p><p>In case you’re unfamiliar, the right to be free from criticism is the core idea behind what used to be complaints about “political correctness” and which have now morphed into the conviction that some accusations are too terrible to be made. See, for example, former Heritage immigration expert (or is that race-and-intelligence obsessive?) Jason Richwine. <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-a-talk-with-jason-richwine/article/2529513">As he told conservative reporter Byron York</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The accusation of racism is one of the worst things that anyone can call you in public life … Once that word is out there, it's very difficult to recover from it, even when it is completely untrue.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/25/grand_old_party_of_crybabies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/25/grand_old_party_of_crybabies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>223</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ted Cruz against the world</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/ted_cruz_against_the_world/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/ted_cruz_against_the_world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Malkin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13307970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas senator’s escalating feud with McCain reveals his arrogance -- and the continuing crackup of the GOP]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One bonus for Republicans in the trifecta of pseudo-scandals ensnaring the Obama White House this month is that it distracted the party from its looming civil war. It’s even possible that the Senate immigration reform got as far as it did partly because wingnut radio talkers and Tea Party xenophobes were consumed by their hatred of Obama, and paying less attention to GOP immigration sellouts.</p><p>But with the easing of scandal fever on the Potomac, Republicans are back to fighting one another, and the week-long Senate clash between freshman Sen. Ted Cruz and Sen. John McCain over the budget is exposing the yawning gulf within the party once again.</p><p>Now that the GOP-dominated House and Democratic-led Senate have passed very different budgets, McCain has tried to argue for the formation of a conference committee that would try to reconcile the two. That might be a thankless, impossible task nowadays, but it’s nonetheless the way Congress has always worked. Democrats agree with McCain, and so do most Republicans.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/ted_cruz_against_the_world/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/24/ted_cruz_against_the_world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>212</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pa. governor &#8220;can&#8217;t find&#8221; any Latinos to work in his administration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/pa_governor_cant_find_any_latinos_to_work_in_his_administration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/pa_governor_cant_find_any_latinos_to_work_in_his_administration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Corbett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Ortega]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["If you can find us one let me know," said Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican governor laughed off the question, saying: "If you can find us one let me know."</p><p>Later in his remarks, Corbett noted that Pennsylvania is home to 800,000 Latino residents (none of whom work for him, of course), who represent about 6.8 percent of the state's total population.</p><p>Matt Ortega, the man behind some of the most beloved <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/23/matt_ortega_the_man_behind_mitt_romney_memes/" target="_blank">Mitt Romney memes</a> of the 2012 election, was quick to lampoon Corbett's remarks with a satirical <a href="http://latinos4corbett.com/" target="_blank">website</a>, "Latinos for Corbett."</p><p>Video via Al Dia:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/BdFH2RzblYA?list=UUGrUeq1FtRamLqZgaCIgB3w" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/pa_governor_cant_find_any_latinos_to_work_in_his_administration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/pa_governor_cant_find_any_latinos_to_work_in_his_administration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet GOP&#8217;s fringy new star, E. W. Jackson</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/deep_thoughts_with_virginias_new_lg_candidate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/deep_thoughts_with_virginias_new_lg_candidate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E.W. Jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ku Klux Klan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303194</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[10 deep, crazy thoughts from the minister -- and Virginia Lt. Gov. nominee -- who has lots to say on gays and KKK]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After years lurking on the fringes of the social conservative movement, expect to start hearing a lot more about E.W. Jackson, an African-American minister who just won the GOP nomination for Virginia's lieutenant governor. Jackson won the nod at the party's convention in Richmond Saturday, "thanks in part to what was far by the <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=31F103EB-A397-8A89-43F770663AAA9B8D">best-received speech</a> of the day," Politico's Jonathan Martin reported.</p><p>We've been aware of Jackson for some years and while it's difficult to pick so few, here are 10 quotes from the conservative bishop to give you a sense of how he views the world.</p><p>1. <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/jackson-gays-lesbians-very-sick-people-psychologically-mentally-emotionally">On gay people</a>: "Their minds are perverted, they’re frankly very sick people psychologically, mentally and emotionally and they see everything through the lens of homosexuality. When they talk about love they’re not talking about love, they’re talking about homosexual sex."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/deep_thoughts_with_virginias_new_lg_candidate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/deep_thoughts_with_virginias_new_lg_candidate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peggy Noonan hears a dog whistle</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/obamas_shocking_reverse_dog_whistle_politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/obamas_shocking_reverse_dog_whistle_politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peggy Noonan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandalgate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meet the press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Gregpry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lee Atwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Karl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Woodward]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302993</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How desperate is GOP? It now fantasizes that Obama’s campaign was a coded order to the IRS to target the Tea Party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s the best evidence the GOP knows the IRS scandal doesn’t reach into the White House: Now they’re saying they don’t need to find evidence that President Obama directed or even knew about the investigation of Tea Party groups’ non-profit status; his actively campaigning for reelection represented a “dog whistle” to tell the agency to target his political enemies.</p><p>The dog whistle quote came via NBC's “Meet the Press” Sunday from Peggy Noonan, who can no longer be taken seriously as a writer or pundit. When host David Gregory pressed her on the lack of evidence for her claims that the IRS scandal was worse than Watergate, Noonan insisted that the president “was giving a dog whistle to people who could launch this thing." The former Reagan-Bush speechwriter vividly summed up, in her thousand points of crazy style, where the IRS “scandal” went over the last few days: Obama didn’t need to order the tax agency to harass Tea Party groups (and his critics don’t need proof that he did so): his criticizing the group during the 2012 campaign, as well as blasting the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision, represented an implicit order to do so.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/obamas_shocking_reverse_dog_whistle_politics/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/obamas_shocking_reverse_dog_whistle_politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I quit the Republican Party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/why_i_quit_the_republican_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/why_i_quit_the_republican_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Latino vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puerto Rico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once called the future of the GOP, Latino outreach director Pablo Pantoja tells Salon how intolerance made him bolt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A year ago, Pablo Pantoja was the future of the Republican Party, courting fellow Latinos for the conservative cause and stumping across Florida <a href="http://www.sunshinestatesarah.com/2012/01/how-this-right-wing-nut-came-to-vote.html">with Ann Romney’s brother</a>. "Hispanics in the area are going to realize the Republican Party is where they belong,” the <a href="http://pablopantoja.com">Puerto Rico-born Iraq vet</a> told the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/28/us/politics/floridas-crucial-hispanic-voters-are-wary-of-romney.html">in April 2012</a>, just a week after being named the Republican National Committee’s Latino outreach director in the electorally all-important Sunshine State. "We are going to engage Hispanics and Latinos like we've never done before," Reince Priebus had told reporters that month <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/04/16/gop_targets_hispanic_voters_in_swing_states.html">in a conference call</a> introducing Pantoja and his counterparts in five other battleground states. (On Election Night, Mitt Romney lost all of those states except for one, North Carolina.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/why_i_quit_the_republican_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/why_i_quit_the_republican_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
