<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Republican Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/republican_party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The new face of &#8220;Democrats are the real racists!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/28/the_new_face_of_democrats_are_the_real_racists/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/28/the_new_face_of_democrats_are_the_real_racists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil rights movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12927691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Review's lame attempt at revisionist political history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/300432">it is a great big lie</a> -- an "utter fabrication with malice and forethought" -- to say that the Democrats lost their longtime hold over the old Confederacy because their support for civil rights legislation drove white Southerners away. That's according to the National Review's Kevin Williamson, who wrote <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/blogs/print/300432">a big National Review piece</a> about how mad this lie makes him, when the secret truth is that Republicans have always been, and will always be, the single most pro-civil rights party ever.</p><p>The piece is largely an attempt to add a patina of respectability to the ancient, brainless comment thread talking point about how Robert Byrd was in the Klan, but lots of Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act, so therefore Democrats are the <em>real</em> racists. (In this respect, the piece is an homage to Jonah Goldberg's "Liberal Fascism," which attempted to expand "Nazi stands for National <em>Socialist</em>" to book length, without pictures.) The only problem is that the "lie" he's arguing against is 100 percent true, except when he states it in such a way that it no longer resembles what anyone has ever actually claimed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/28/the_new_face_of_democrats_are_the_real_racists/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/28/the_new_face_of_democrats_are_the_real_racists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to cure the crazy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/26/how_to_cure_the_crazy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/26/how_to_cure_the_crazy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12927566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The return of Donald Trump forces the question: Is there anything the GOP can do to recover from insanity?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing when writing about the Republican Party and the crazy – you can always be certain that it’ll generate new examples. So just when the news that a member of the House accused dozens of Democrats in Congress of being Communists seemed to be going stale, <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57441823-503544/romney-camp-mum-on-trumps-latest-birther-comments/">along comes Donald Trump</a> – who is scheduled to appear at a fundraiser with Mitt Romney next week – to spout birther nonsense.</p><p>For those of us who believe that there’s something seriously wrong with the Republican Party (and see <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Even-Worse-Than-Looks-Constitutional/dp/0465031331">Tom Mann and Norm Ornstein’s new book</a>; see also <a href="http://plainblogaboutpolitics.blogspot.com/2012/04/core-of-problem-lies-with-republican.html">my argument</a> that the problem is not about how “conservative” they are, but about their radical style), the big question is whether anything can be done about it. American democracy needs two strong, solid political parties, but currently one of the parties is just a mess – incapable of making coherent policy when it’s in office, and dangerously obstructionist when it’s out of office.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/26/how_to_cure_the_crazy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/26/how_to_cure_the_crazy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP to modernity: Stop</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/gop_to_modernity_stop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/gop_to_modernity_stop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12924655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For House Republicans, the less we know about our country and our planet, the better]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watching the antics of the House GOP, you get the very strong sense that if the class of Republicans elected in 2010 were offered a chance to repeal <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_Enlightenment">the Enlightenment,</a> they would leap at the opportunity. The great flowering of science and philosophy that reached critical mass in the 17th century employed human reason to batter away at the dogmas of blind faith. But as far as the Tea Party seems to be concerned, that was just one big wrong turn.</p><p>The most recent evidence that the current incarnation of the Republican Party just can't handle the truth arrived this month when House Republicans <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/20/sunday-review/the-debate-over-the-american-community-survey.html?_r=1&amp;wpisrc=nl_wonk">voted to get rid of</a> the American Community Survey. The ACS is an annual information-gathering effort that's part of the U.S. Census. Every year, a randomized sample of 3 million Americans is surveyed for data on "<a href="http://www.amstat.org/outreach/pdfs/ACS_one-pager.pdf">demographic, housing, social and economic characteristics."</a> In one form or another, the U.S. government has been carrying out similar surveys since 1850 -- the current version is the fourth major iteration.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/gop_to_modernity_stop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/gop_to_modernity_stop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mitt&#8217;s favorite new dodge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/mitts_favorite_new_dodge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/mitts_favorite_new_dodge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney and the GOP insist the economy is more important than social issues. Why can't we address both?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most overused metaphors in a writer’s arsenal is the one about “walking and chewing gum at the same time.” As a hiker and Big League Chew enthusiast, I particularly hate this cliché. Nonetheless, I feel it is fitting right now because it so perfectly summarizes the argument being made by Republicans. They now insist that America cannot simultaneously walk the walk on equal rights and also chew economic gum.</p><p>In the last week, Colorado was the testing ground for this talking point. At the presidential level, Republican nominee Mitt Romney criticized a Denver television reporter for daring to ask about his position on, among other issues, same-sex marriage. Before restating his opposition, he scoffed at the question, asking: “Aren’t there issues of significance that you’d like to talk about [like] the economy? The growth of jobs? The need to put people back to work?”</p><p>At the same time, Colorado's Republican House Speaker Frank McNulty twice blocked a vote on a bill to legalize civil unions. His rationale? “We should not be spending time on divisive social issues when unemployment remains far too high and [when] far too many Coloradans remain out of work,” he said. Echoing that sentiment, the shadowy Republican front group Compass Colorado financed an automated telephone call telling thousands of voters that the push for civil unions was unacceptable because it is “promoting [a] divisive social agenda over Colorado job creation.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/mitts_favorite_new_dodge/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/mitts_favorite_new_dodge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>30</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Huntsman for New York City mayor?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/yes_jon_huntsman_please_run_for_mayor_of_new_york/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/yes_jon_huntsman_please_run_for_mayor_of_new_york/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 17:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Huntsman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, please. It would be very funny to see him lose]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Jon Huntsman should <em>definitely</em> run for mayor of New York, because I never tire of watching Jon Huntsman get rejected by voters. The best part of a Jon Huntsman campaign is when his well-heeled supporters very sincerely and tragically argue that the fact that no one wants to vote for Jon Huntsman is a sign that the Republic itself is in peril. They would get so sad and melodramatic when he got 10 percent of the vote.</p><p>Now, there is no evidence that Jon Huntsman is planning for run for mayor of New York City, but one of his annoying daughters tossed this one out there last night:</p><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>Trying to convince dad @<a href="https://twitter.com/JonHuntsman">JonHuntsman</a> to run for mayor of NYC. Thoughts? <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%2523whynot">#whynot</a>?</p>
<p>— Abby Huntsman (@HuntsmanAbby) <a href="https://twitter.com/HuntsmanAbby/status/202942537521049600" data-datetime="2012-05-17T02:04:06+00:00">May 17, 2012</a></p></blockquote><p><script charset="utf-8" type="text/javascript" src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script>Why not? I mean sure <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2012/05/jon-huntsman-for-new-york-mayor.html?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+nymag%2Fintel+%28Daily+Intelligencer+-+New+York+Magazine%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Reader">he has never lived in New York</a> and has no connection to the city, but why not?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/yes_jon_huntsman_please_run_for_mayor_of_new_york/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/17/yes_jon_huntsman_please_run_for_mayor_of_new_york/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul sets up Rand for 2016</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/ron_paul_sets_up_rand_for_2016/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/ron_paul_sets_up_rand_for_2016/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12921474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cult libertarian hero keeps his campaign alive, barely, as he prepares to hand the reins to his son]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Ron Paul says <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/ron-paul-suspends-campaign-revolution-rnc-tampa-republican.php">he is going to stop actively campaigning</a>, but his supporters will continue to rack up delegates by storming state conventions. What will he do with these delegates? <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/05/so-what-will-ron-pauls-delegates-do-at-the-rnc-convention.php?ref=fpb">That is still unclear.</a> (Barter them for gold?) What is the point of this strategy, exactly? Also unclear, but <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/05/15/ron-paul-s-sneaky-maneuver-why-he-s-scaling-back-his-campaign.html">the Daily Beast's Ben Jacobs today</a> says it's part of a "sneaky maneuver" to help his son Rand out. Ron will continue to consolidate power but will not appear to be actively sabotaging the party's nominee. <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2012/05/14/the_ron_paul_campaign_is_done_with_primaries_thanks.html">Dave Weigel says</a> the maneuver is less sneaky and barely a maneuver: He doesn't want it to be a huge embarrassment when he loses Kentucky, the state his son represents in the Senate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/ron_paul_sets_up_rand_for_2016/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/ron_paul_sets_up_rand_for_2016/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>108</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Partisan death jam</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/06/partisan_death_jam/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/06/partisan_death_jam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12915050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two parties aren't just making progress impossible, they're destroying our political system. An expert explains]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you thought the debates over the debt ceiling last year – one of the most striking examples of political dysfunction and gridlock in recent memory -- were over, think again. Although Republicans agreed to a small raise and to put off discussion of the issue until after the upcoming 2012 elections, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell told Fox, “We’ll be doing it all over” in 2013. Clearly, the partisan rupture that’s dividing Washington is not going to heal any time soon, but how did things get so dire to begin with?</p><p>When congressional scholars Thomas E. Mann and Norman J. Ornstein say <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Even-Worse-Than-Looks-Constitutional/dp/0465031331/saloncom08-20">“It’s Even Worse Than It Looks”</a> – the title of their book – they’re being serious (subtitle: “How the American Constitutional System Collided With the New Politics of Extremism”). Mann, the W. Averell Harriman chair and senior fellow in Governance Studies at the Brookings Institution, and Ornstein, a resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, began the Congress Project in the midst of the 1978 midterm campaign to track the institution as it evolved. What they’ve found since hasn’t been encouraging.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/06/partisan_death_jam/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/06/partisan_death_jam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sabotage: The new GOP plan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/sabotage_the_new_gop_plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/sabotage_the_new_gop_plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12914480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Paul Ryan and the Republicans' latest tactic is outright treachery: They want to break the government]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Ryan is nothing if not indefatigable. On Wednesday, the Wisconsin Republican introduced yet another <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/house/224767-ryan-introduces-legislation-to-replace-12-trillion-sequester">budget bill.</a> The targets of his cuts -- a long list of Democratic priorities -- are painfully familiar. But this time around Ryan wrapped them up in a new package of urgency: preserving national security!</p><p>Ryan and his fellow Republicans (and a not inconsiderable number of Democrats) are desperate to find a way to avoid the dreaded  "sequester" -- a package of around $600 billion in defense spending cuts that are scheduled to start kicking in at the end of this year. Never mind the holy grail of deficit reduction: When the beggar with his hand stuck out is the Pentagon, "entitlement" isn't such a dirty word, after all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/sabotage_the_new_gop_plan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/04/sabotage_the_new_gop_plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republican fear factor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/republican_fear_factor_salpart/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/republican_fear_factor_salpart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives' paranoid alternate-reality can be explained by their brain chemistry -- and their media choices]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Consider for a moment just how terrifying it must be to live life as a true believer on the right. Reality is scary enough, but the alternative reality inhabited by people who watch Glenn Beck, listen to Rush Limbaugh, or think Michele Bachmann isn't a joke must be nothing less than horrifying.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>Research suggests that conservatives are, on average, more susceptible to fear than those who identify themselves as liberals. Looking at MRIs of a large sample of young adults last year, researchers at University College London discovered that “greater conservatism was associated with increased volume of the right amygdala” (<a href="http://www.cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(11)00289-2" target="_blank">$$</a>). The amygdala is an ancient brain structure that's activated during states of fear and anxiety. (The researchers also found that “greater liberalism was associated with increased gray matter volume in the anterior cingulate cortex” – a region in the brain that is believed to help people manage complexity.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/republican_fear_factor_salpart/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/03/republican_fear_factor_salpart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Demographic suicide</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/the_gops_demographic_death_wish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/the_gops_demographic_death_wish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12910807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Republicans can't stop alienating Hispanics, women and young people]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the three demographic groups whose electoral impact is growing fastest? Hispanics, women and young people. Who are Republicans pissing off the most? Latinos, women, and young people.</p><p>It’s almost as if the GOP can’t help itself.</p><p>Start with Hispanic voters, whose electoral heft keeps growing as they comprise an ever-larger portion of the electorate. Hispanics now favor President Obama over Romney by more than two to one, according to a recent <a href="http://www.people.press.org/2012/04/17/with-voters-focused-on-the-economy-Obama-lead-narrows/?src=prc-headline">Pew poll</a>.</p><p>The movement of Hispanics into the Democratic camp has been going on for decades. What are Republicans doing to woo them back? Replicating California Republican Governor Pete Wilson’s disastrous support almost twenty years ago for Proposition 187 – which would have screened out undocumented immigrants from public schools, health care, and other social services, and required law-enforcement officials to report any “suspected” illegals. (Wilson, you may remember, lost that year’s election, and California’s Republican Party has never recovered.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/the_gops_demographic_death_wish/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/the_gops_demographic_death_wish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minimum-wage misconceptions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/minimum_wage_misconceptions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/minimum_wage_misconceptions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Labor Movement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12910538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contrary to right-wing propaganda, decent pay for workers helps the economy and boosts job creation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Tom Harkin, Democrat of Iowa, has introduced a bill to raise the federal minimum wage to $9.80 from its present level of $7.25. Polls are showing many voters<a href="http://stamford.patch.com/articles/poll-voters-support-death-penalty-raising-minimum-wage-9f40b48b"> in favor,</a> though they are confused about what it would mean for the job market. The truth is that a move would be good for a slow economy and have a positive impact on the job crisis. Naturally, this has led to the usual cries of opposition, largely based on the notion that raising the minimum wage hurts the very people it is supposed to help. Typical of this view is a letter to the New York Times from Michael Saltsman, a fellow at the Employment Policies Institute, a business-backed nonprofit research group (surprise!).</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>Saltsman <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/21/opinion/what-are-the-effects-of-raising-the-minimum-wage.html?_r=1">trots out the old canards</a> against the minimum wage, claiming that research indicates that a minimum wage increase "simply doesn’t help the poor — in fact, it hurts them." He cites studies which showed that states with their minimum wages between 2003 and 2007 found no associated decline in state poverty rates. Saltsman gives three reasons for this:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/minimum_wage_misconceptions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/27/minimum_wage_misconceptions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now apparently it&#8217;s a &#8220;slam&#8221; to say Paul Ryan likes Ayn Rand</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/now_apparently_its_a_slam_to_say_paul_ryan_likes_ayn_rand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/now_apparently_its_a_slam_to_say_paul_ryan_likes_ayn_rand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12910614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The right's favorite congressman declares backsies on admiration for notorious author]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's something kinda nutty. One guy said all of the following things:</p><ul>
<li>“The reason I got involved in public service, by and large, if I had to credit one thinker, one person, <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/04/26/ryan-now-rejects-ayn-rand-will-the-real-paul-ryan-please-come-forward/">it would be Ayn Rand</a>.”</li>
<li>"You know you’ve arrived in politics when you have an urban legend about you, and this one is mine,” <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/297023/ryan-shrugged-robert-costa">chuckles Representative Paul Ryan</a>, the Budget Committee chairman, as we discuss his purported obsession with author and philosopher Ayn Rand."</li>
<li>"<a href="http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2012/04/how-tell-paul-ryan-wants-be-veep-hes-rejected-his-former-idol-ayn-rand/51605/">I give out 'Atlas Shrugged' as Christmas presents</a>, and I make all my interns read it. Well... I try to make my interns read it."</li>
<li>"Ayn Rand, more than anybody else, did a fantastic job explaining the morality of capitalism, the morality of individualism, and that, to me, is <a href="http://www.religiondispatches.org/dispatches/sarahposner/5921/paul_ryan%3A_i_reject_ayn_rand,_she%27s_an_atheist!/">what matters most."</a></li>
<li>“I reject her philosophy.... It’s an atheist philosophy. It reduces human interactions down to mere contracts and it is antithetical to my worldview. "</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/now_apparently_its_a_slam_to_say_paul_ryan_likes_ayn_rand/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/now_apparently_its_a_slam_to_say_paul_ryan_likes_ayn_rand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joseph McCarthy reborn</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/joseph_mccarthy_reborn/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/joseph_mccarthy_reborn/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12910290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP Rep. Allen West told supporters that 78 to 81 Democrats in Congress are "members of the Communist Party"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We’ve talked at times about George Orwell’s classic novel "1984," and the amnesia that sets in when we flush events down the memory hole, leaving us at the mercy of only what we know today. Sometimes, though, the past comes back to haunt, like a ghost. It happened recently when we saw U.S. Rep. Allen West of Florida on the news.</p><p>A Republican and Tea Party favorite, he was asked at a local gathering how many of his fellow members of Congress are “card-carrying Marxists or International Socialists.”</p><p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-republican-congressman-claims-7881-democrats-are-communists-20120411,0,1492342.story">He replied</a>, “I believe there’s about 78 to 81 members of the Democrat Party who are members of the Communist Party. It’s called the <a href="http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/">Congressional Progressive Caucus</a>.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/joseph_mccarthy_reborn/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/26/joseph_mccarthy_reborn/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The meaning of Orrin Hatch&#8217;s nightmare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/the_meaning_of_orrin_hatchs_nightmare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/the_meaning_of_orrin_hatchs_nightmare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 08:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12907866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[His battle for survival is a perfect illustration of what conservatism was -- and what it's become]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the slimmest margin, Orrin Hatch failed at this weekend’s Utah Republican convention to ward off a contested primary.</p><p>With just 32 more votes out of the 3,908 cast, he would have cleared the magic 60 percent threshold and secured the nomination for a seventh Senate term on the spot. Instead, Hatch now has a date in the June 26 primary with Dan Liljenquist, a Tea Party activist and former state senator.</p><p>This marks the first time since he won his seat in 1976 that Hatch will face a primary, and he enters the race as the favorite. But the convention results point to a restive and volatile Republican electorate. Hatch spent more than $5 million in the run-up to Saturday’s vote, and yet the little-known Liljenquist still ended up with 41 percent. It’s absolutely possible that Hatch’s career will come to an end in June.</p><p>His struggle for survival is, in part, a reflection of the risk any politician takes in staying around too long. Hatch is 78 years old and has been in office since 1977. A simple desire for something new and different surely accounts for some of resistance he’s confronting.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/the_meaning_of_orrin_hatchs_nightmare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/23/the_meaning_of_orrin_hatchs_nightmare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dangers of an all-white GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/dangers_of_an_all_white_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/dangers_of_an_all_white_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12865191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives\' loyalty to their racist fringe isn\'t just disastrous for Republicans. It\'s bad for Democrats too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“If planning a trip to a beach or amusement park at some date, find out whether it is likely to be swamped with blacks on that date… Do not act the Good Samaritan to blacks in apparent distress, e.g., on the highway… In a pure meritocracy there would be very low proportions of blacks in cognitively demanding jobs.” These are just a few of the pearls of anti-wisdom offered by conservative pundit John Derbyshire in his instantly infamous essay, <a href="http://takimag.com/article/the_talk_nonblack_version_john_derbyshire/print#axzz1raZFqqb3">“The Talk: Nonblack Version.”</a> Derbyshire’s employers at the National Review <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/295506/derbs-screed-rich-lowry">were quick</a> to <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/295514/parting-ways-rich-lowry">distance themselves</a> from him and his racist manifesto, which was written as a response to the outcry over the hunting and killing of Trayvon Martin.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/dangers_of_an_all_white_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/dangers_of_an_all_white_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>96</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Republicans debate Romney donations</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/gay_republicans_debate_romney_donations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/gay_republicans_debate_romney_donations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12857511</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rich backers of marriage equality movement also helping to make dedicated equality-opponent president]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a past life, as a candidate running for statewide office in Massachusetts, Mitt Romney used to paint himself as a champion of gay rights. While the evidence of his experimentation with supporting legal equality lives on in conservative opposition research, Romney has of late not been particularly eager to push the GOP on LGBT issues. As Maggie Haberman and Emily Schultheis <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=6D9E2C0A-4403-469E-9DB1-579F4CAD69E8">report today in Politico</a>, this has put some of his major gay Republican donors in a bit of a bind.</p><p>Lately gay and LGBT-friendly Republicans have taken a major role in bankrolling and organizing the marriage campaign nationwide, as part of a fairly sudden and welcome shift in public attitude toward same-sex marriage and full legal equality for gays and lesbians. Some of the conservatives donating to equality causes have also donated to and fundraised for Romney. They are attempting to justify this fact in a few ways.</p><p>First, that Romney and Obama both oppose gay marriage. Which is true!</p><blockquote><p>“Mitt Romney is where President Obama is on this issue,” a Republican backer of the likely nominee said.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/gay_republicans_debate_romney_donations/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/12/gay_republicans_debate_romney_donations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Romney&#8217;s poor state problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/11/romneys_poor_state_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/11/romneys_poor_state_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12847261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt's dismal primary performance in lower-income states reflects the GOP's growing class divide]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><em>“No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.” -- Matthew 6:24 (NIV)</em></p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>As Rick Santorum exits and Newt Gingrich fades out, who would have imagined that the Gospel of St. Matthew would provide the best handle on the GOP primaries this year?</p><p>Even in 2009, it was obvious that the Republican Establishment and many of America’s richest citizens were busy laying the groundwork for a very special effort to take back the White House in 2012. After the 2010 congressional elections produced the second largest swing in the two-party vote against the Democrats since 1826, the focus on 2012 became ferocious. The road, though, was bumpy. But by late last year, as one candidate after another flamed out, the hopes of most Obama opponents were settling, sometimes ruefully, on Mitt Romney.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/11/romneys_poor_state_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/11/romneys_poor_state_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Christie just made stuff up about tunnel he canceled</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/chris_christie_just_made_stuff_up_about_tunnel_he_canceled/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/chris_christie_just_made_stuff_up_about_tunnel_he_canceled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12845921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hard-charging New Jersey governor's reasons for canceling a major transit project called into question by report]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops, turns out Chris Christie was just lying about everything when he canceled that train tunnel project in 2010.</p><p>Canceling the long-planned Access to the Region's Core rail tunnel project was likely the most high-profile decision Christie made in his first months as governor of New Jersey. The press <a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/chris_christie_today_show_ode/">generally treated it as a tough-but-necessary decision</a> from a no-nonsense politician who was getting serious about the budget. It was actually just an incredibly short-sighted way of getting around a promise not to raise New Jersey's (very low) gas tax. And Christie lied about the reason he canceled the project, according to a study from the Government Accountability Office.</p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/10/nyregion/report-disputes-christies-reason-for-halting-tunnel-project-in-2010.html?pagewanted=all">The New York Times has the details of the report today</a>, and in classic Times fashion it is repeatedly calling Christie a liar without using the word. Instead, Christie "exaggerated" and "misstated" his rationales for canceling the project.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/chris_christie_just_made_stuff_up_about_tunnel_he_canceled/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/chris_christie_just_made_stuff_up_about_tunnel_he_canceled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Kornacki on &#8220;Rachel Maddow&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/steve_kornacki_on_rachel_maddow_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/steve_kornacki_on_rachel_maddow_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12845621</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon staff writer Steve Kornacki talks to Rachel Maddow about the GOP's alienation of female voters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Monday evening, Steve Kornacki and Rachel Maddow discussed the effects of the Republicans' anti-women campaign rhetoric: "We have seen Republican women leaving the party in droves."</p><p><object id="msnbc61f3f" width="420" height="245" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=46999862&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="transparent" /><param name="src" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="flashvars" value="launch=46999862&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="pluginspage" value="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" /><embed id="msnbc61f3f" width="420" height="245" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" flashvars="launch=46999862&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" wmode="transparent" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" /></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/steve_kornacki_on_rachel_maddow_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/steve_kornacki_on_rachel_maddow_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox&#8217;s misinformation effect</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/foxs_misinformation_effect/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/foxs_misinformation_effect/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12835921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's not just the programming. Conservatives are more likely to seek out outlets that affirm their views]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In June of last year, Jon Stewart went on air with Fox News’ Chris Wallace and started a major media controversy over the channel’s misinforming of its viewers. “Who are the most consistently misinformed media viewers?” Stewart asked Wallace. “The most consistently misinformed? Fox, Fox viewers, consistently, every poll.”</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a>Stewart’s statement was factually accurate, as we’ll see. The next day, however, the fact-checking site PolitiFact <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jun/20/jon-stewart/jon-stewart-says-those-who-watch-fox-news-are-most/">weighed in</a> and rated it “false.”In claiming to check Stewart’s “facts,” PolitiFact ironically committed a serious error—and later, doubly ironically, failed to correct it. How’s that<em> </em>for the power of fact checking?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/foxs_misinformation_effect/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/foxs_misinformation_effect/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

