<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 16:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Audit finds Scott Walker&#8217;s job creation agency repeatedly broke law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/audit_scott_walkers_job_creation_agency_repeatedly_broke_law/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/audit_scott_walkers_job_creation_agency_repeatedly_broke_law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Walker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two-year old Wisconsin Economic Development Corp. was strongly criticized in a state audit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gov. Scott Walker's job creation agency has been plagued by repeated law-breaking and mismanagement, according to an audit released by the state's non-partisan Legislative Audit Bureau.</p><p>In a report that was almost 100 pages, the Bureau sharply criticized the Wisconsin Economic Development Corp., created in 2011 by Walker and the state legislature, and called for much more oversight.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.twincities.com/politics/ci_23147491/blistering-audit-faults-wisconsin-job-creation-agency">Associated Press</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The audit faulted WEDC for not having sufficient policies to administer its $520 million worth of grant, loan and tax credit programs effectively, including some policies required by law. It awarded $80 million in its first year.</p> <p>The agency did not consistently follow the law or existing policies when making awards, and had no policies for determining how to handle delinquent loan amounts, the audit said.</p> <p>It lacked invoices or other contractually required documentation showing authorized costs for seven of 29 grants reviewed, the audit said. Four contracts gave $906,000 total in tax credits for job creation and employee training that had already occurred, the audit said. Twelve of 14 recipients of grant and loan contracts worth at least $100,000 did not submit verified financial statements as required by law, the audit found.</p></blockquote><p>"This audit dates back to 2011 and largely reflects information that WEDC has known for some time," a Walker spokesman said in a statement. "This new agency has taken proactive and positive measures to address its issues, and Governor Walker is confident in the direction of WEDC as an agency that aims to promote job creation and economic growth for Wisconsin."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/audit_scott_walkers_job_creation_agency_repeatedly_broke_law/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/audit_scott_walkers_job_creation_agency_repeatedly_broke_law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter King: &#8220;I wouldn&#8217;t want to be involving New York with Ted Cruz&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peter_king_i_wouldnt_want_to_be_involving_new_york_with_ted_cruz/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peter_king_i_wouldnt_want_to_be_involving_new_york_with_ted_cruz/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Cruz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["It's a little early to forgive and forget," King said of Cruz's vote against Hurricane Sandy aid]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Peter King doesn't think the New York GOP should have invited Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, to host its fundraiser this month, in light of his vote against Hurricane Sandy relief aid. "I wouldn't want to be involving New York with Ted Cruz," King said.</p><p>"He went out of his way to attack New York on the bill,” King, R-N.Y., added, the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/dc/2013/05/ny-gop-welcomes-ted-cruz-pete-king-does-not">New York Daily News</a> reports. "It's a little early to forgive and forget."</p><p>“It’s life and death,” King continued. “There were really false and phony charges made against the Sandy aid, and if Ted Cruz had prevailed, my constituents would be homeless."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peter_king_i_wouldnt_want_to_be_involving_new_york_with_ted_cruz/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/peter_king_i_wouldnt_want_to_be_involving_new_york_with_ted_cruz/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa panel OKs probe of alleged payments by Bachmann campaign</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/iowa_panel_oks_probe_of_alleged_payments_by_bachmann_campaign/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/iowa_panel_oks_probe_of_alleged_payments_by_bachmann_campaign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2013 13:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kent Sorenson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An investigator will look at allegedly improper payments to a state senator for Bachmann's presidential run]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Iowa Senate Ethics Committee approved moving forward with a probe into alleged criminal and ethics violations by Michele Bachmann's 2012 presidential campaign. Iowa’s Supreme Court chief justice will now appoint a special investigator who will look at alleged payments made by the campaign to state Sen. Ken Sorenson for work on the campaign.</p><p>From the Minneapolis <a href="http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/205705121.html">Star Tribune</a>:</p><blockquote><p>An affidavit reviewed by the committee on Wednesday showed that former Bachmann chief of staff Andy Parrish said Bachmann approved plans to indirectly pay Sorenson $7,500 a month to work on her campaign. The alleged payments could violate an Iowa Senate ethics rule that prohibits members from accepting payments for work on political campaigns.</p> <p>Parrish’s affidavit included copies of e-mails between him and other staff members discussing plans to use a company run by Bachmann’s then-national political director, Guy Short, to funnel payments to Sorenson. Sorenson has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing. He filed an affidavit from an attorney who claimed to have reviewed his bank account and found no payments from the Bachmann campaign, her political action committee or Short’s company, C&amp;M Strategies.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/iowa_panel_oks_probe_of_alleged_payments_by_bachmann_campaign/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/02/iowa_panel_oks_probe_of_alleged_payments_by_bachmann_campaign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOPer: My constituents love the sequester</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/house_goper_my_constituents_love_the_sequester/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/house_goper_my_constituents_love_the_sequester/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 20:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Billy Long]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Billy Long says his constituents "want to see more sequestration, not less"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Billy Long, a Republican from Missouri, boasted on Monday that his constituents can't get enough of the sequester, and tell him that they want more of it. "The people that I've talked to seem to be doing well," he told <a href="http://ozarksfirst.com/fulltext?nxd_id=800642" target="_hplink">KOLR10 News</a>. "In fact, when I go out in restaurants here in town, people come up to me. They want to see more sequestration, not less."</p><p>"So I think that's different than it could be in some parts of the country, but we haven't seen any measurable effect here at all," he added.</p><p>A new poll from <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57582228/poll-most-say-sequester-has-not-impacted-them/">CBS News</a> shows that 69 percent of Americans don't believe the sequester has impacted them. That may be because the cuts have been very specific and localized, and particularly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/sequestrations_stealth_assault/">affected</a> low-income communities.</p><p>On the other hand, Congress did <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/senate_fixes_the_part_of_the_sequestration_that_affects_rich_people/">take urgent steps</a> to rectify the part of sequestration that was being felt by wealthier people: FAA furloughs, which were causing flight delays.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/house_goper_my_constituents_love_the_sequester/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/house_goper_my_constituents_love_the_sequester/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rise of the conservative revolutionaries</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2000 Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost half of Republicans think an armed revolution may be needed soon. What does it mean for guns and democracy?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's plenty of proof of an authoritarian streak and animus toward democratic ideals in today's conservative movement. There was the movement's use of its judicial power to halt a vote recount and instead <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2012/06/yes-bush-v-gore-did-steal-the-election.html">install</a> a president who had lost the popular vote. There is the ongoing GOP effort to make it <a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/the-gop-war-on-voting-20110830">more difficult for people to cast a vote in an election</a>. There is the GOP's <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/post/the-history-of-the-filibuster-in-one-graph/2012/05/15/gIQAVHf0RU_blog.html">record use of the Senate filibuster</a> to kill legislation that the vast majority of the country supports. There is a GOP leader's declaration that what the American people want from their government simply <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2627805#.UYEaob8Ts18">"doesn't matter."</a></p><p>Up until today, you might have been able to write all that anti-democratic pathology off as one infecting only the Republican Party's politicians and institutional leadership, but not its rank-and-file voters. But then this morning Fairleigh Dickinson University released this gun control-related pollshowing that authoritarianism runs throughout the the entire party.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/rise_of_the_conservative_revolutionaries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>276</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christie&#8217;s first ad: &#8220;&#8216;Compromise&#8217; isn’t a dirty word&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/christies_first_ad_compromise_isn%e2%80%99t_a_dirty_word/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/christies_first_ad_compromise_isn%e2%80%99t_a_dirty_word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Buono]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Jersey's governor's first ad buy touts his work in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Christie released his first ad for his 2013 reelection campaign, <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/blogs/hotlineoncall/2013/04/n-j-s-christie-poised-to-launch-first-t-v-ad-30">reportedly</a> part of a $1.5 million buy, touting his handling of the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy and responding to backlash he's received from Republicans for his work with and praise of President Obama.</p><p>Christie has been “working with Democrats and Republicans. Believing that as long as you stick to your principles, 'compromise' isn’t a dirty word,” the ad says.</p><p>”The most important thing he did has little to do with numbers, statistics or even politics. He made us proud to say we we’re from New Jersey,” it continues.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6PQ-SuCqJPA" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/christies_first_ad_compromise_isn%e2%80%99t_a_dirty_word/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/christies_first_ad_compromise_isn%e2%80%99t_a_dirty_word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats hold edge in Massachusetts special election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/democrats_hold_edge_in_massachusetts_special_election_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/democrats_hold_edge_in_massachusetts_special_election_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans are quietly conceding that Congressman Ed Markey is likely to fill John Kerry's senate seat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOSTON (AP) — National Republicans cheered former Navy SEAL Gabriel Gomez's Massachusetts primary victory, but Democratic Congressman Ed Markey enjoys tremendous advantages in the special election to replace former U.S. Sen. John Kerry.</p><p>Tuesday's primary elections set up an eight-week sprint to the June 25 election.</p><p>In Markey, the race pits a longtime liberal politician known for environmental advocacy against Gomez, a fresh-faced social moderate with a distinguished biography and untested political skills. On paper, it looks like a competitive contest, but Republicans quietly concede that Markey is the strong favorite in a state where only around 11 percent of voters are registered Republicans.</p><p>"As we've shown before in the state, anything can happen in a special election," said Republican strategist Ron Kaufman, Massachusetts' national committeeman.</p><p>Indeed, little-known Republican state Sen. Scott Brown stunned Democrats in his 2010 special election U.S. Senate victory in a contest that became a referendum on Obama's healthcare overhaul. So far, at least, this race has drawn little national interest, even before being overshadowed by the Boston Marathon bombings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/democrats_hold_edge_in_massachusetts_special_election_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/democrats_hold_edge_in_massachusetts_special_election_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans embrace conspiracy theory that DHS is buying up ammo</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/republicans_embrace_conspiracy_theory_that_dhs_is_buying_up_ammo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/republicans_embrace_conspiracy_theory_that_dhs_is_buying_up_ammo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Inhofe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Jordan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13286056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[James Inhofe and Jim Jordan believe the Obama Administration is trying to curb access to bullets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A conspiracy theory is getting renewed life among Republicans who claim that the Obama administration, specifically the Department of Homeland Security, is buying up ammunition in order to thwart gun owners by taking over the market. Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., and Rep. Frank Lucas, both Republicans from Oklahoma, introduced a bill last week to crack down on the alleged practice.</p><p><a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/news/296471-gop-aims-to-slow-federal-bullet-buys">The Hill</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe and Rep. Frank Lucas have introduced a bill that would prohibit every government agency — except the military — from buying more ammunition each month, than the monthly average it purchased from 2001 to 2009.</p> <p>The lawmakers say the Obama administration is buying up exceedingly high levels of ammunition in an attempt to limit the number of bullets the American public have access to on the open marketplace.</p></blockquote><p>Inhofe argued that Obama has been "adamant about curbing law-abiding Americans’ access and opportunities to exercise their Second Amendment rights," and that "One way the Obama Administration is able to do this is by limiting what’s available in the market with federal agencies purchasing unnecessary stockpiles of ammunition."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/republicans_embrace_conspiracy_theory_that_dhs_is_buying_up_ammo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/republicans_embrace_conspiracy_theory_that_dhs_is_buying_up_ammo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas AG rules domestic partnership benefits violate state constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/texas_ag_rules_domestic_partnership_benefits_violate_state_constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/texas_ag_rules_domestic_partnership_benefits_violate_state_constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greg Abbott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Greg Abbott argued that the benefits violate the state's constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriages]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott, a Republican, issued an opinion arguing that providing domestic partnership benefits to same-sex couples in the state is a violation of the state's constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.</p><p>The non-binding opinion was in response to a request by state Sen. Dan Patrick, a Republican, who objected to the Pflugerville school district's decision to offer domestic partnership benefits.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.dallasvoice.com/texas-ag-10146274.html">Dallas Voice</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Pflugerville’s decision also prompted a Republican state lawmaker to introduce a bill that would cut funding for school districts that offer DP benefits. The bill — HB 1568 by Drew Springer of Muenster — is awaiting a vote in the House.</p> <p>While Pflugerville was the first school district to offer DP benefits, several other local government entities do so, including the cities of Austin, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth and San Antonio; as well as Dallas County and Parkland hospital. Most offer DP benefits to both same-sex and opposite-sex domestic partners.</p></blockquote><p>In his opinion, Abbott writes that domestic partnerships "have various characteristics in common with the criteria for marriage," enough that "a court is likely to conclude that the domestic partnership legal status about which [Patrick inquires] is 'similar to marriage' and therefore barred by article I, section 32 of the Texas Constitution."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/texas_ag_rules_domestic_partnership_benefits_violate_state_constitution/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/texas_ag_rules_domestic_partnership_benefits_violate_state_constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FBI looking into McDonnell&#8217;s ties to donor</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/fbi_investigating_mcdonnells_ties_to_donor/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/fbi_investigating_mcdonnells_ties_to_donor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob McDonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ken Cuccinelli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A campaign donor for the Virginia governor paid for the food at his daughter's wedding]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FBI agents are looking into the ties between Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, R, his wife Maureen, and the chief executive of Star Scientific, Jonnie R. Williams Sr, a major campaign donor to McDonnell who paid for $15,000 worth of catering at his daughter's wedding. McDonnell did not disclose the donation in his 2012 filings.</p><p>Investigators are also looking into other potential gifts that McDonnell did not disclose, the Washington Post reports.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/fbi-looking-into-relationship-between-mcdonnells-donor/2013/04/29/c97fec10-b115-11e2-9a98-4be1688d7d84_story.html">Post</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Now, federal officials are trying to determine whether to expand that investigation into a broader look at whether McDonnell or his administration took any action to benefit Star Scientific in exchange for monetary or other benefits, according to the four people familiar with the interviews. It is unclear whether the probe will be broadened.</p></blockquote><p>Star Scientific, which manufactures the dietary supplement Anatabloc, has recently been the target of a securities probe by Virginia investigators.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/fbi_investigating_mcdonnells_ties_to_donor/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/fbi_investigating_mcdonnells_ties_to_donor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colbert Busch goes there in debate with Sanford</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/colbert_busch_goes_there_in_debate_with_sanford_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/colbert_busch_goes_there_in_debate_with_sanford_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Sanford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Colbert-Busch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Democratic candidate reminded her Republican counterpart he used taxpayer funds to finance his affair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) -- Republican Mark Sanford and Democrat Elizabeth Colbert Busch planned to hit the campaign trail a day after a spirited debate in their race for a vacant congressional seat along the South Carolina coast.</p><p>"I rocked it," Colbert Busch said following Monday's 75-minute debate before an audience of about 500 at The Citadel, which was telecast on C-SPAN. Sanford, a former two-term governor trying to revive a political career damaged by an extramarital affair, said he would let the pundits decide who won.</p><p>With Election Day just a week away, both have separate appearances Tuesday, then appear before a Charleston Metro Chamber of Commerce group on the city's waterfront before attending a forum sponsored by the Goose Creek NAACP. During both appearances, the candidates will address attendees but won't debate.</p><p>They did debate Monday, before a lively audience where supporters frequently broke into shouts or applause.</p><p>Early on, Colbert Busch, the sister of political satirist Stephen Colbert, reminded Sanford that he once used taxpayer funds to "leave the country for a personal purpose" - referring to the extramarital affair with an Argentine woman he had while governor. In general, Colbert Busch has refused to bring up Sanford's personal past during the campaign.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/colbert_busch_goes_there_in_debate_with_sanford_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/colbert_busch_goes_there_in_debate_with_sanford_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell responds to Obama&#8217;s drink joke with Clint Eastwood joke</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House Correspondents' Dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[McConnell's campaign tweeted a picture of the senator drinking with an empty chair]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell responded to a crack President Obama made about him at the White House Correspondents' Dinner with a reference to Clint Eastwood's empty chair bit at the Republican National Convention.</p><p>Obama had <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/28/watch_obama_and_conans_speeches_at_the_correspondents_dinner/">joked</a> that people complain that he doesn't reach across the aisle enough. "'Why don't you get a drink with Mitch McConnell?' they ask," Obama said. "Really? Why don't <em>you</em> get a drink with Mitch McConnell?"</p><p>McConnell responded during an appearance before the Southeast Kentucky Chamber of Commerce, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/29/mcconnell-jokes-about-his-soft-side-in-response-to-obama/">Washington Post</a> reports, saying: “I’m shocked. He’s obviously not seeing my soft side.”</p><p>His campaign Twitter account also <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/mcconnell-responds-to-obamas-whcd-joke-about-having">tweeted</a> a picture of McConnell drinking with an empty chair, also looping in <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/clint_eastwood_steals_the_rnc/">Clint Eastwood</a>:</p><p>[embedtweet id="328939838835392513"]</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/mcconnell_responds_to_obamas_drink_joke_with_clint_eastwood_joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christie: I don&#8217;t regret sparring with GOP over Sandy relief</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/christie_i_dont_regret_sparring_with_gop_over_sandy_relief/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/christie_i_dont_regret_sparring_with_gop_over_sandy_relief/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I’ve got to do my job,” he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie said Monday that he doesn't regret sparring with Republicans who were holding up relief funding after Huricane Sandy. “I say the same thing to all my critics, no matter where they are in the spectrum, and that is that I’ve got a job to do,” Christie said on "Morning Joe" Monday, “and the fact is, There was nothing else that ever crossed my mind in the days after.”</p><p>He continued: "You’ve got people suffering and you say to yourself, I’ve got to do my job. I say the same thing to all of them – put yourself in my shoes, and if you’re a responsible elected official, you would do nothing different.”</p><p>At the time, Christie <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/chris_christie_gops_toxic_politics_to_blame_for_delayed_sandy_aid/">sharply criticized</a> House Speaker John Boehner and other House Republicans for holding up a vote on relief funds after the hurricane, meanwhile praising President Obama for his efforts in the state.</p><p>“Listen, I supported Mitt Romney and I was very vocal about it,” Christie added. “But the fact is, presidential politics was not the first thing on my mind that day. It was getting my state recovered and restored.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/christie_i_dont_regret_sparring_with_gop_over_sandy_relief/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/christie_i_dont_regret_sparring_with_gop_over_sandy_relief/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Census reveals historic black voter turnout</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New data shows more African Americans voted in 2012 than any other ethnic group, and at a greater rate than whites]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — America's blacks voted at a higher rate than other minority groups in 2012 and by most measures surpassed the white turnout for the first time, reflecting a deeply polarized presidential election in which blacks strongly supported Barack Obama while many whites stayed home.</p><p>Had people voted last November at the same rates they did in 2004, when black turnout was below its current historic levels, Republican Mitt Romney would have won narrowly, according to an analysis conducted for The Associated Press.</p><p>Census data and exit polling show that whites and blacks will remain the two largest racial groups of eligible voters for the next decade. Last year's heavy black turnout came despite concerns about the effect of new voter-identification laws on minority voting, outweighed by the desire to re-elect the first black president.</p><p>William H. Frey, a demographer at the Brookings Institution, analyzed the 2012 elections for the AP using census data on eligible voters and turnout, along with November's exit polling. He estimated total votes for Obama and Romney under a scenario where 2012 turnout rates for all racial groups matched those in 2004. Overall, 2012 voter turnout was roughly 58 percent, down from 62 percent in 2008 and 60 percent in 2004.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/black_voter_turnout_rate_surpasses_whites_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-pot GOPer in New York takes plea deal for possession charge</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/anti_pot_goper_in_new_york_takes_plea_deal_for_possession_charge/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/anti_pot_goper_in_new_york_takes_plea_deal_for_possession_charge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Katz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marijuana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decriminalization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Katz will serve twenty hours of community service after getting pulled over in March]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New York's Republican State Assemblyman Steve Katz will have his pot charge wiped out if he completes twenty hours of community service and keeps out of other legal trouble, according to a plea agreement.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.lohud.com/article/20130425/NEWS04/304250044/WATCH-Assemblyman-Steve-Katz-gets-plea-deal-pot-charge?&amp;nclick_check=1">The Journal News</a>:</p><blockquote><p>In the deal announced Thursday, Katz received a lesser parking ticket and an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal, which would result in the marijuana charge being thrown out if he finishes the community service by the end of June and doesn’t run afoul of the law for up to a year. He did not appear in court Thursday, leaving it to his attorney to formally enter the plea. Katz did not return a call for comment.</p></blockquote><p>Katz, who was pulled over for speeding in March and then charged with pot possession, sits on the Assembly Committee on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse, and also happens to have <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2013/03/steve-katz-assemblyman-charged-with-marijuana-possession.html">voted against</a> legalizing medical marijuana in 2012.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/anti_pot_goper_in_new_york_takes_plea_deal_for_possession_charge/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/anti_pot_goper_in_new_york_takes_plea_deal_for_possession_charge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP official&#8217;s Facebook status: She&#8217;s &#8220;hot enough to almost make me register Democrat&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gop_officials_facebook_status_shes_hot_enough_to_almost_make_me_register_democrat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gop_officials_facebook_status_shes_hot_enough_to_almost_make_me_register_democrat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Kush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A New Mexico official gets suspended for sexist social media activity -- during a meeting. It's just the beginning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>His <a href="https://www.facebook.com/kush.steve">Facebook friends</a> call him "an honorable man" who was just "being funny." They say that "People are way to [sic] sensitive in this day and age." But when Steve Kush, the executive director of Bernalillo County's (New Mexico) Republican Party, went on a social media rampage during a local commissioners' meeting about the minimum wage earlier this week, his party chairman, Frank Ruvelo, saw things differently.</p><p>Seems his fellow Republicans did not appreciate what Kush said on Twitter and Facebook regarding a 19-year-old female at the meeting, "Nice hat Working America chick but damn you are a radical bitch." Nor did it enjoy his remarks depicting the organization's state director Chelsey Evans as "Uh oh another Working America chick," or his observation that she had "nice boots…I know she makes more than min wage." And they definitely didn't find it too amusing when he declared that she "was hot enough to almost make me register democrat."</p><p>He's currently suspended, indefinitely, without pay.</p><p><a href="http://newmexico.watchdog.org/17738/i-absolutely-crossed-the-line-bernallio-county-gop-exec-suspended-for-facebook-comments/">"It was an ill-fated attempt at humor,</a>" Kush told Watchdog.org Wednesday. "Do I regret it? Yes … I absolutely crossed the line."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gop_officials_facebook_status_shes_hot_enough_to_almost_make_me_register_democrat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gop_officials_facebook_status_shes_hot_enough_to_almost_make_me_register_democrat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barbara Bush on Jeb: &#8220;We&#8217;ve had enough Bushes&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_on_jeb_weve_had_enough_bushes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_on_jeb_weve_had_enough_bushes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeb Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2016 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former First Lady said she doesn't want her son to run for President]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former First Lady Barbara Bush says that though she thinks Jeb Bush is a strong candidate for the presidency in 2016, she doesn't want him to run. "We've had enough Bushes," she said on "The Today Show."</p><p>"He's by far the best qualified man, but no," she <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/296067-barbara-bush-weve-had-enough-bushes">continued</a>. "I really don't. I think it's a great country, there are a lot of great families, and it's not just four families or whatever. There are other people out there that are very qualified, and we've had enough Bushes."</p><p>Bush added that she doesn't think Jeb, the former governor of Florida, will run: "He's the most qualified, but I don't think he'll run."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_on_jeb_weve_had_enough_bushes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/barbara_bush_on_jeb_weve_had_enough_bushes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ayotte&#8217;s approval tanks after opposing background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/ayottes_approval_tanks_after_opposing_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/ayottes_approval_tanks_after_opposing_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 19:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kelly Ayotte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New Hampshire senator's approval rating is down 15 points, according to a new poll]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from the Democratic-leaning Public Policy Polling shows that Sen. Kelly Ayotte's, R-N.H., approval rating dropped 15 points, following her vote against the Senate's measure to impose stricter gun background checks.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/04/ayotte-faces-backlash-over-gun-vote.html">PPP</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Ayotte now has a negative approval rating with 44% of voters giving her good marks and 46% disapproving. That's down a net 15 points from the last time we polled on her, in October, when she had a 48% approval with 35% disapproving. 75% of New Hampshire voters- including 95% of Democrats, 74% of independents, and 56% of Republicans- say they support background checks. And 50% of voters in the state say Ayotte's 'no' vote will make them less likely to support her in a future election, compared to just 23% who consider it to be a positive.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/ayottes_approval_tanks_after_opposing_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/ayottes_approval_tanks_after_opposing_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa GOPers: Cut pay of justices who made gay marriage decision</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/iowa_gopers_cut_pay_of_justices_who_made_gay_marriage_decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/iowa_gopers_cut_pay_of_justices_who_made_gay_marriage_decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans are targeting the Iowa Supreme Court justices who unanimously ruled to legalize gay marriage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several Republicans in the Iowa House of Representatives are pushing to cut the pay of the Iowa Supreme Court justices who ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage in 2009 -- though they contend that it's not meant to punish the justices.</p><p>Rep. Tom Shaw, a Republican, said that the bill was meant "to maintain the balance of power” between the different branches of government in the state. "We’re just holding them responsible for their decision, for going beyond their bounds,” he said.</p><p>The <a href="http://thegazette.com/2013/04/23/iowa-house-conservatives-want-to-cut-pay-for-justices-in-same-sex-decision/">Iowa Gazette</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>The justices “trashed the separation of powers” with their unanimous Varnum v. Brien decision and implementation of same-sex marriage without a change in state law banning any marriages expect between one man and one woman, added Rep. Dwayne Alons, R-Hull.</p> <p>Their amendment to <a href="http://coolice.legis.iowa.gov/Cool-ICE/default.asp?Category=billinfo&amp;Service=Billbook&amp;ga=85&amp;hbill=HF120">House File 120</a>, the judicial branch budget bill, would lower the salaries of the four justices on the seven-member court who were part of the unanimous Varnum v. Brein decision to $25,000 – the same as a state legislator.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/iowa_gopers_cut_pay_of_justices_who_made_gay_marriage_decision/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/iowa_gopers_cut_pay_of_justices_who_made_gay_marriage_decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former Ryan campaign intern charged with nude picture blackmail scheme</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/former_ryan_campaign_intern_charged_with_nude_picture_blackmail_scheme/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/former_ryan_campaign_intern_charged_with_nude_picture_blackmail_scheme/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Savader]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280652</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adam Savader allegedly threatened to publish nude pictures of 15 women unless they sent him more pictures]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam Savader, a former campaign intern to Paul Ryan and Newt Gingrich, was arrested and charged with "Internet extortion and cyber stalking," for an alleged scheme to blackmail women with naked pictures of themselves.</p><p>From the FBI's <a href="http://www.fbi.gov/detroit/press-releases/2013/new-york-man-charged-with-internet-extortion-and-cyber-stalking">press release</a> on the arrest:</p><blockquote><p>According to the affidavit, from May 2012 through February 2013, Adam Paul Savader sent anonymous text messages using Google Voice numbers to 15 women stating that he had nude photographs of the women and threatening to distribute the nude photographs to the women’s friends and family members unless the women sent him more nude photographs of themselves. Savader sent some of the victims links to a photo-sharing website where nude pictures of the victims had been posted.</p></blockquote><p>From the <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/romney-campaign-intern-busted-nude-pics-blackmail-scheme-article-1.1325621">New York Daily News</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/former_ryan_campaign_intern_charged_with_nude_picture_blackmail_scheme/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/former_ryan_campaign_intern_charged_with_nude_picture_blackmail_scheme/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>