<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Republicans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/republicans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 12:35:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to oust Michele Bachmann from Congress</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/bachmann_challenger_not_eager_for_obamas_help/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/bachmann_challenger_not_eager_for_obamas_help/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Graves]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leading her in the polls, Democratic challenger Jim Graves tells Salon his plan to upset the Tea Party icon in 2014]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrat Jim Graves was feeling good as he sat down for an interview with Salon in Washington Monday, the same day his campaign released a poll showing him <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/poll_shows_bachmann_trailing_in_2014_reelection_race/">two points ahead</a> of Rep. Michele Bachmann, whom he narrowly lost to in 2012.</p><p>This time around, he'll start with higher-name ID -- "I think we started off last time around at 18 percent and now we're pushing 75 to 80 percent" -- and more support from national Democrats, who were initially skeptical about his chances and didn't get heavily involved <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/15/national_dems_boost_bachmann_challenger/">until mid-October</a>. "I don't think they jumped in at all," Graves quipped of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, before quickly excusing them in a typical Minnesota-nice fashion: "There was lower-hanging fruit, I don't blame them."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/bachmann_challenger_not_eager_for_obamas_help/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/bachmann_challenger_not_eager_for_obamas_help/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inhofe and Coburn: Red state hypocrites</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/inhofe_and_coburn_red_state_hypocrites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/inhofe_and_coburn_red_state_hypocrites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma tornado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sen. James Inhofe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sen. Tom Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tornadoes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304571</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, we have deserving and undeserving disasters, Oklahoma senators James Inhofe and Tom Coburn explain]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a week ago, Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe suggested that President Obama might be impeached over the Benghazi non-scandal. Now, Inhofe must watch as Obama declares Inhofe's state a disaster area and promises Oklahomans “all the resources they need at their disposal.”</p><p>Inhofe, of course, believes his state deserves those resources, even though he voted down aid to Hurricane Sandy victims. On MSNBC, Chris Jansing confronted Inhofe about his calling the Sandy aid bill a “slush fund,” and the brazen right-winger insisted the two issues shouldn’t be linked.</p><p>“Let’s look at that, that was totally different,” Inhofe told Jansing. “They were getting things — for instance that was supposed to be in New Jersey, they had things in the Virgin Islands, they were fixing roads there, they were putting roofs on houses in Washington, D.C.; everyone was getting in and exploiting the tragedy taking place. That won’t happen in Oklahoma.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/inhofe_and_coburn_red_state_hypocrites/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/inhofe_and_coburn_red_state_hypocrites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>235</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oklahoma senator: Tornado aid &#8220;totally different&#8221; from Sandy aid</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/oklahoma_senator_tornado_aid_totally_different_from_sandy_aid/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/oklahoma_senator_tornado_aid_totally_different_from_sandy_aid/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Inhofe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma tornado]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. James Inhofe, a Republican, voted against federal funding for Hurricane Sandy victims]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. James Inhofe, a Republican from Oklahoma, argued that there is no comparison between Hurricane Sandy relief, which he voted against last fall, and aid for his state in the wake of Monday's devastating tornado because the two are "totally different."</p><p>Inhofe contended on Tuesday that the Hurricane Sandy relief bill was different because it was filled with pork. “They were getting things, for instance, that was supposed to be in New Jersey," he said on MSNBC. "They had things in the Virgin Islands. They were fixing roads there, they were putting roofs on houses in Washington, D.C. Everybody was getting in and exploiting the tragedy that took place. That won’t happen in Oklahoma.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/oklahoma_senator_tornado_aid_totally_different_from_sandy_aid/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/oklahoma_senator_tornado_aid_totally_different_from_sandy_aid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>122</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aloof, shifty Obama: Nixon times ten thousand!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maureen Dowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denis McDonough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our evil president managed to both mastermind the IRS flap and be such a bad boss that no one told him about it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/politico44/2013/05/senior-wh-staff-knew-of-irs-investigation-did-not-164378.html">According to Jay Carney</a>, everyone in the White House knew about the big IRS scandal for a few weeks before it went public. Everyone except the president because this whole month has been a season-long plot arc on HBO's "Veep." (Speaking of, where's Joe Biden been lately?) Everyone was afraid to tell their boss about this dumb thing the IRS did, and then he learned about it on the news, and now he is probably <em>super</em> pissed.</p><p>Clearly Obama is a horrible boss, and the White House is a toxic work environment, probably, where people are afraid to report bad news to their superiors. <em>Just like Nixon, times ten thousand.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oklahoma senator wants to offset tornado aid with other cuts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/oklahoma_senator_wants_to_offset_tornado_aid_with_other_cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/oklahoma_senator_wants_to_offset_tornado_aid_with_other_cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma tornado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Inhofe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FEMA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both Republican Oklahoma senators voted against federal relief for Hurricane Sandy victims]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Tom Coburn, a Republican from Oklahoma, said that he would "absolutely" push to offset any federal relief for the devastating tornado in Oklahoma with cuts elsewhere, <a href="http://blogs.rollcall.com/wgdb/coburn-wants-tornado-disaster-aid-to-be-offset/">Roll Call</a> reports.</p><p>"That's always been his position [to offset disaster aid]," Coburn spokesman John Hart told the Huffington Post. "He supported offsets to the bill funding the OKC bombing recovery effort."</p><p>Both Coburn and his colleague James Inhofe, also a Republican from Oklahoma, have repeatedly voted against federal disaster relief for various parts of the country, including, most recently, the aid package for Hurricane Sandy victims. Both have also opposed increasing FEMA's funding.</p><p>But, as the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/oklahoma-senators-disaster-relief_n_3309234.html?utm_hp_ref=politics">Huffington Post</a> points out, Coburn and Inhofe have also previously supported disaster aid for their own state:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/oklahoma_senator_wants_to_offset_tornado_aid_with_other_cuts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/oklahoma_senator_wants_to_offset_tornado_aid_with_other_cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh: No one willing to impeach the first black president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush announced on Monday that Obama is not in "any jeopardy" of impeachment -- but only because he is black ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh announced on Monday that President Obama won't be <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/impeach_obama_again/" target="_blank">impeached</a> over recent controversies and that "Benghazi is not going to touch" him. And no, it's not because the talking points "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/two_scandals_deflated_one_persists/" target="_blank">scandal</a>" wasn't really, you know, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/two_scandals_deflated_one_persists/" target="_blank">scandalous</a>, or that the Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus told impeachment-happy members of Congress to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/" target="_blank">cool it until they have evidence</a> to support their claims or any other reasons that are based in reality.</p><p>It's because Obama is black, and "the American people are not going to tolerate the first black president being removed from office," according to Limbaugh.</p><p><iframe src="http://mediamatters.org/embed/194156" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="480" height="360"></iframe></p><p>h/t <a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/05/20/limbaugh-obama-wont-be-removed-from-office-beca/194156" target="_blank">Media Matters</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top GOP official: &#8220;Sometimes our party does not value&#8221; women &#8220;as much&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/top_gop_official_sometimes_our_party_does_not_value_women_as_much/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/top_gop_official_sometimes_our_party_does_not_value_women_as_much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Jankowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican State Leadership Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State legislatures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“It’s not hard to recruit women to run; they are running,” said the Republican State Leadership Committee president]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Jankowski, the president of the Republican State Leadership Committee, the group in charge of electing Republicans at the state level, says he thinks it's difficult for Republican women to get elected because when it comes to local politics, the party is such an "old boy network."</p><p>“It’s not hard to recruit women to run; they are running,” Jankowski said Monday, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/20/top-republican-gop-old-boy-network-doesnt-value-women-as-much/">Washington Post</a> reports. “I think sometimes our party does not value them as much.”</p><p>“It’s safe to say that there are institutional barriers. We've met with candidates who felt like they weren't part of the old boy network,” he continued. “It can be a bit of a male-dominated club at that level, and it’s important that they feel welcome and they’re given the resources.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/top_gop_official_sometimes_our_party_does_not_value_women_as_much/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/top_gop_official_sometimes_our_party_does_not_value_women_as_much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McConnell: Obamacare will dominate 2014 midterms</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mcconnell_obamacare_will_dominate_2014_midterms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mcconnell_obamacare_will_dominate_2014_midterms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“I think it’s coming back big-time," he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., predicted that Obamacare would dominate the 2014 midterm elections.</p><p>“I don’t know what the issues will be next year. If I were predicting what’s likely to be the biggest issue in the 2014 election, I think it would be Obamacare,” he said on Meet The Press, the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/19/mcconnell-predicts-obamacare-will-be-biggest-issue-of-2014-election/?wprss=rss_election-2012">Washington Post</a> reports. “I think it’s coming back big-time.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mcconnell_obamacare_will_dominate_2014_midterms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/mcconnell_obamacare_will_dominate_2014_midterms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jindal: IRS officials should &#8220;go to jail&#8221; for targeting</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jindal_irs_officials_should_go_to_jail_for_targeting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jindal_irs_officials_should_go_to_jail_for_targeting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 14:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bobby Jindal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louisiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302707</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["You cannot take the freedom of law-abiding Americans...and keep your own freedom"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, a Republican, reportedly argued that the IRS officials responsible for targeting tea party and other conservative groups deserve jail time.</p><p>“Anyone who participated in this targeting of Americans for their political beliefs, anyone who knew about it, anyone who simply looked the other way, and anyone under whose watch this occurred needs to be fired,” <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/05/18/jindal-irs-offenses-worthy-of-jail-time/">CNN</a> reports Jindal planned to say in a speech before Virginia Republicans on Saturday, according to his prepared remarks.</p><p>“But in this instance, it is the IRS, people in a position of public trust, who have violated the Constitution of the United States of America. You cannot take the freedom of law-abiding Americans, whether you disagree with them or not, and keep your own freedom. When you do that, you go to jail,” he continued.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jindal_irs_officials_should_go_to_jail_for_targeting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/jindal_irs_officials_should_go_to_jail_for_targeting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How right-wingers use semantic tricks to kill government</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/how_right_wingers_use_semantic_tricks_to_kill_government/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/how_right_wingers_use_semantic_tricks_to_kill_government/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlement reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Welfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertarians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loaded terminology like "entitlements" and "welfare" skews the debate and alters America. Here's how it works]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Semantic infiltration” is a term coined by the foreign policy expert Fred Ikle and popularized by the late Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan. Ikle <a href="http://spectator.org/archives/2010/07/10/semantic-infiltration">defined it thus</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Semantic infiltration means one undermines one’s own position in negotiations by adopting unknowingly the terms which the adversary “infiltrates.”</p></blockquote><p>As a conservative, Ikle drew most of his examples of semantic infiltration from liberal usages that became mainstream, like “affirmative action” for race- or gender-based preference policies. But in recent years, it is arguably the center-left that has suffered the most from the successful semantic infiltration of public discourse by loaded conservative terminology.</p><p>Witness the two terms “the welfare state” and “entitlements.” The right has managed to turn “welfare state,” once a neutral description for a modern system of economic security for individuals, into a pejorative phrase.</p><p>An even greater triumph of semantic infiltration by the right has been the universal use of the term “entitlements.” As used by conservatives and liberals alike, “entitlements” usually refers to three social insurance programs — two of them universal (Social Security and Medicare) and one means-tested (Medicaid).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/how_right_wingers_use_semantic_tricks_to_kill_government/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/how_right_wingers_use_semantic_tricks_to_kill_government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>111</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obstruction will ruin GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/obstruction_will_ruin_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/obstruction_will_ruin_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Lew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Playing politics and abusing the system can excite the extremes, but it's a recipe for long-term political disaster]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s obvious that the unprecedented Senate Republican obstruction of executive branch nominations is bad for the president; it’s bad for the smooth functioning of the government; and it’s bad for voters who elected a Democratic president and a solid, 55-seat Democratic majority in the Senate. I’ve argued, too, that it’s bad for the Senate.</p><p>Less obvious? It’s bad for Republicans.</p><p>Now, in electoral terms, it can’t be bad for both parties, since electoral politics is a zero-sum game. Indeed, that’s sort of the problem for Republicans; obstruction of these nominations almost certainly has zero electoral effect. After all, most voters couldn’t tell you who the nominees for secretary of labor or to head the Environmental Protection Agency are, let alone the obscure rules Republicans are using to delay their confirmation.</p><p>So the effects of massive, across-the-board obstruction are going to be on policy, not elections. And that’s not a zero-sum game – and it will hurt Republicans and Republican-aligned groups, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/obstruction_will_ruin_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/obstruction_will_ruin_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>169</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Krist Novoselic: My plan to fix Congress, curb obstruction</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/krist_novoselic_my_plan_to_fix_congress_curb_obstruction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/krist_novoselic_my_plan_to_fix_congress_curb_obstruction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nirvana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electoral reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Citizens United]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerrymandering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington state]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norm Ornstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nirvana's former bassist is working to end political dysfunction. Here's his plan to make Congress more accountable]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Congress is totally dysfunctional is evident to most Americans, with <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2013/05/09/congressional_approval_ratings_gallup_polls_shows_americans_have_surprisingly.html">just 16 percent</a> telling pollsters they approve of the job the body is doing. The good news is there’s a constitutional solution that would dramatically improve its efficacy, boost participation, and curb partisan obstruction: switching to a form of proportional representation by electing multiple members in each district based on how it votes.</p><p>Legend and myth was important to ancient Roman society. They practiced augury, such as reading the way birds fly, then attributing bad situations to unhappy gods. In reality, their government (a republic, no less) was run by a few elites who made bad decisions. Americans tend to be similar in buying into myths, while a real culprit of our stagnant democracy is right before our eyes. Nero may have fiddled while Rome burned, but too many of us are focused on distractions -- like blaming Citizens United v. FEC for everything wrong with politics -- while political insiders rig the game.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/krist_novoselic_my_plan_to_fix_congress_curb_obstruction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/krist_novoselic_my_plan_to_fix_congress_curb_obstruction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How a fight with Rick Santorum made an IRS commissioner</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 16:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Miller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here’s the little-told story of how Doug Shulman, who led the IRS when targeting occurred, unexpectedly got the job]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While President Obama fired IRS commissioner Steven Miller this week for failing to stop the enhanced scrutiny the IRS gave 501c4 applications with conservative missions, most of the activity happened under a man who was never supposed to get the job: Miller’s predecessor, Doug Shulman. Indeed, the little-known story of how Shulman was appointed by President George W. Bush in 2007 stems from an unfortunate incident that derailed his party’s first choice for the spot.</p><p>One thing to keep in mind is that the president and his staff have literally thousands of posts to fill. A White House that doesn’t want to get bogged down will defer many of these lower-level appointments to politicians in his party who have some special interest or expertise in a position. The IRS commissioner is usually seen as a low-level position, since the commissioner merely enforces the law and has no ability to actually make law.</p><p>When it came time to replace the retiring IRS commissioner in 2007, Senator Charles Grassley, ranking member on the Senate Finance Committee, offered up one of his senior staffers on the committee by the name of Dean Zerbe.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/how_a_fight_with_rick_santorum_made_an_irs_commissioner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Mostly Republicans are following IRS, Benghazi scandals</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/poll_mostly_republicans_are_following_irs_benghazi_scandals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/poll_mostly_republicans_are_following_irs_benghazi_scandals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only a slight majority of Americans overall say they're following the scandals closely]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a new <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/162584/americans-attention-irs-benghazi-stories-below-average.aspx">Gallup</a> poll, only slight majority of Americans say they're engaged in the IRS and Benghazi scandals - with 54 percent saying they're closely following the IRS scandal, and 53 percent saying the same of Benghazi - and there is a big split between how closely Republicans and Democrats are following the stories.</p><p>From the poll:</p><blockquote><p>Republicans are much more likely to say they are following these news stories closely than are independents or in particular Democrats. There is a 21-percentage-point gap between Republicans and Democrats in terms of following the Benghazi story closely, and a 27-point gap on the IRS story.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/poll_mostly_republicans_are_following_irs_benghazi_scandals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/poll_mostly_republicans_are_following_irs_benghazi_scandals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: GOP mischaracterized Benghazi emails</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hillary Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CBS News reports that the initially leaked emails have different quotes from the White House emails]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBS News is reporting that leaked versions of the Benghazi emails sent out by Republicans had key differences from those released by the White House earlier this week.</p><p>The version of the emails initially sent out last Friday purported to show that the State Department and the White House gave input into the talking points issued by the CIA following the attacks on the U.S. consulate. But on Wednesday the White House released 100 pages of emails that contradict this conclusion.</p><p><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57584947/wh-benghazi-emails-have-different-quotes-than-earlier-reported/">CBS News</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>On Friday, Republicans leaked what they said was a quote from Rhodes: "We must make sure that the talking points reflect all agency equities, including those of the State Department, and we don't want to undermine the FBI investigation."</p> <p>But it turns out that in the actual email, Rhodes did not mention the State Department.</p> <p>It read: "We need to resolve this in a way that respects all of the relevant equities, particularly the investigation."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/republicans_reportedly_altered_benghazi_emails/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota GOPer: Climate change is a &#8220;United Nations fraud&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/minnesota_goper_climate_change_is_a_united_nations_fraud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/minnesota_goper_climate_change_is_a_united_nations_fraud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Gruenhagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minnesota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He added that those who believe in man-made global warming "believe that exhaling causes global warming"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>State Rep. Glenn Gruenhagen, R-Minn., doesn't want the rest of the state legislature to worry about the prospect of man-made climate change, because "it's just a complete United Nations fraud and lie, OK?"</p><p>Gruenhagen was speaking on the House floor, and cited "facts from CPAC" showing that "in the last 16 years, there's been no global warming." He continued: "So members, I'd recommend that you keep breathing, OK? Because, you know, man-made global warming believes that exhaling causes global warming. I mean, the more you study it the more utter nonsense you see it is."</p><p>Watch, via <a href="http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2013/05/mngop_rep_gruenhagen_on_climate_change_its_just_a_complete_united_nations_fraud_video.php">Minnesota City Pages</a>:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/gDkGfO0BopE" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/minnesota_goper_climate_change_is_a_united_nations_fraud/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/minnesota_goper_climate_change_is_a_united_nations_fraud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Tancredo may run for office again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/tom_tancredo_may_run_for_office_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/tom_tancredo_may_run_for_office_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 13:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Tancredo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13300285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former Congressman is considering another run for governor of Colorado]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., an immigration hard-liner who once <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/93049-tancredo-urges-tea-partiers-to-send-obama-back-to-kenya">suggested</a> sending Obama "back" to Kenya, is considering another bid for governor in 2014.</p><p>The <a href="http://www.denverpost.com/breakingnews/ci_23249713/tom-tancredo-considering-run-governor-2014">Denver Post </a>reports:</p><blockquote><p>Contacted Wednesday by The Denver Post, Tancredo said he has not yet made a final decision.</p> <p>In 2010, Tancredo ran in a <a href="http://blogs.denverpost.com/thespot/2010/07/26/tancredo-will-run-for-governor-as-american-constitution-party-candidate/12382/" target="_blank">tumultuous gubernatorial contest as a third-party candidate</a>, netting more than 35 percent of the vote in a lopsided Democratic victory by then-Denver Mayor John Hickenlooper. Republican candidate Dan Maes received 11 percent of the vote.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/tom_tancredo_may_run_for_office_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/16/tom_tancredo_may_run_for_office_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the group the IRS actually denied: Democrats!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/meet_the_group_the_irs_actually_revoked_democrats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/meet_the_group_the_irs_actually_revoked_democrats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 20:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299671</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although Tea Party applicants got unfair IRS scrutiny, only one known group had status revoked. They’re Democrats]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone agrees that the IRS shouldn’t have targeted groups with “Tea Party” or “Patriot” in their names for special scrutiny in awarding tax-exempt status. NBC News reports two agents have been disciplined for doing so, and the Justice Department announced a criminal probe. But so far no one has identified a single conservative group that was denied status in the controversial review, though some faced bureaucratic hurdles and had their tax-exempt status delayed.</p><p>In fact, the only known 501(c)(4) applicant to have its status denied happens to be a <em>progressive</em> group: the Maine chapter of Emerge America, which trains Democratic women to run for office. Although the group did no electoral work, and didn’t participate in independent expenditure campaign activity either, its partisan status apparently disqualified it from being categorized as working for the “common good.”</p><p>Ironically, the national organization and its earlier chapters had gotten tax-exempt status by the IRS during the Bush administration in 2006. But it appears as though the Maine group’s rejection triggered a review of the entire organization, and Emerge America and all of its chapters had their tax-exempt status revoked. Emerge reincorporated with 527 status, which requires it to report its donors. You can read the IRS letters explaining its decisions at the bottom of this post.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/meet_the_group_the_irs_actually_revoked_democrats/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/meet_the_group_the_irs_actually_revoked_democrats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boehner on IRS: &#8220;Who’s going to jail over this scandal?”</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/boehner_on_irs_who%e2%80%99s_going_to_jail_over_this_scandal%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/boehner_on_irs_who%e2%80%99s_going_to_jail_over_this_scandal%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Clearly someone violated the law,” the House speaker said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Speaker John Boehner said Wednesday that resignations over the IRS scandal would not be enough, and he believes there were criminal violations involved in the alleged targeting of conservative groups by the agency. “My question isn’t about who’s going to resign, my question is who’s going to jail over this scandal?” he <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/05/15/boehner-on-irs-scandal-whos-going-to-jail-over-this-scandal/">told</a> reporters.</p><p>“There are laws in place to prevent this type of abuse," Boehner continued. "Someone made a conscious decision to harass and to hold up these requests for tax-exempt status. I think we need to know who they are and whether they violated the law. Clearly someone violated the law."</p><p>On Tuesday, Attorney General Eric Holder said that he has <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/holder_ive_ordered_a_probe_of_outrageous_irs_targeting/">ordered</a> the FBI to investigate whether any criminal violations occurred. Holder is scheduled to appear before a House committee on Wednesday, where he will likely face questions about this scandal, as well as the Department of Justice's decision to subpoena phone records from the Associated Press.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/boehner_on_irs_who%e2%80%99s_going_to_jail_over_this_scandal%e2%80%9d/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/boehner_on_irs_who%e2%80%99s_going_to_jail_over_this_scandal%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid: Republicans hypocritical for Benghazi, IRS outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/reid_republicans_hypocritical_for_benghazi_irs_outrage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/reid_republicans_hypocritical_for_benghazi_irs_outrage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Where was their outrage when groups on the other side of the political spectrum were under attack?" he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid chastised Republicans for their outrage over the scandal surrounding the IRS's targeting of conservative groups, arguing that in the past when the agency targeted groups of a different ideological persuasion, Republicans said nothing.</p><p>"This is not the first time we've seen this," Reid told reporters, according to the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/harry-reid-irs_n_3274166.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003">Huffington Post</a>. "It wasn't long ago that the IRS inappropriately targeted the NAACP, Greenpeace and a California church that was progressive, called the All-Saints Church in Pasadena. It was interesting at that time, we didn't hear a single Republican grandstand the issue then. Where was their outrage when groups on the other side of the political spectrum were under attack?"</p><p>Reid emphasized that he believes the IRS's behavior was "inappropriate," adding: "I believed it then, I believe it now."</p><p>He continued that accusations about a Benghazi coverup by the Obama administration are "about smear politics and nothing else." Reid added: "Earlier this year, they didn't say a word when Republicans held up for months and months security funding of our embassies."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/reid_republicans_hypocritical_for_benghazi_irs_outrage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/reid_republicans_hypocritical_for_benghazi_irs_outrage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
