<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Richard Blumenthal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/richard_blumenthal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The New York Times misses the mark on Linda McMahon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/dodd_democrats_better_off/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/dodd_democrats_better_off/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/27/dodd_democrats_better_off</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An exhaustive magazine piece attempts to explain her rise, but presents some curious history instead]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rise of Linda McMahon, the wrestling executive who is pumping tens of millions of dollars into her own Republican Senate campaign in Connecticut, is certainly a fascinating story. McMahon has pulled <a href="http://www.pollster.com/blogs/ctsen_50_blumenthal_d_45_mcmah.php">within striking distance</a> of Democrat Richard Blumenthal in recent polling, and the idea that she'll win in November -- and possibly deliver the Senate to the GOP&#160;in the process -- is no longer laughable.</p><p>But the New York Times magazine sure has a funny way of looking at the race. The premise of Matt Bai's <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/26/magazine/26politics-t.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1">exhaustive piece</a> in Sunday's issue is that McMahon is succeeding in part because of the decline of powerful party institutions. There is, obviously, something to this, in the sense that party machines everywhere aren't what they used to be.</p><p>But Bai suggests that the unwillingness of state Democratic leaders to coax the scandalized Sen. Chris Dodd into seeking another term this year is a sign of that decline, and that in the day of John Bailey, the long-departed state party boss, there would have been a full-court press to get :</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/dodd_democrats_better_off/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/27/dodd_democrats_better_off/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joe Lieberman still flirting with endorsing Linda McMahon</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/joe_lieberman_linda_mcmahon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/joe_lieberman_linda_mcmahon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/08/joe_lieberman_linda_mcmahon</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our most sanctimonious senator won't let a little pro wrestling sully his admiration for Republican Linda McMahon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Connecticut senator and former Democratic nominee for vice-president Joe Lieberman is <a href="http://www.ctnewsjunkie.com/ctnj.php/archives/entry/lieberman_still_on_the_fence_in_u.s._senate_race/">just not sure whom he'll endorse</a> in the U.S. Senate race between Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, Democrat, and wrestling entrepreneur Linda McMahon, Republican. He can't make up his mind! Sure, he's known and respected Blumenthal for years, but Linda McMahon has a lot going for her, too. Like, endorsing her would enrage the mean liberals who tried to unseat Lieberman in 2006. And annoying those terrible liberals is pretty much all he lives for, these days.</p><p>Lieberman is perhaps the least popular senator currently in office, so his endorsement is completely meaningless. Getting worked up about it is not really worth anyone's time. But still -- just like in the healthcare debate, Lieberman is letting his petty desire for revenge take precedence over his supposed principles, again.</p><p>"I'm not ready to make a choice," Lieberman, who is still a registered Democrat, told the Connecticut press yesterday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/joe_lieberman_linda_mcmahon/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/08/joe_lieberman_linda_mcmahon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A new threat to the GOP&#8217;s Senate chances</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/gop_blows_senate_races/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/gop_blows_senate_races/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Senate Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patty Murray, D-Wash.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul vs. Jack Conway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/02/gop_blows_senate_races</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Illinois Republican's fibbing about military record catches up with him, possibly costing the party a key race]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what's going to be fun? When the GOP doesn't do as well as expected this November, and everybody starts blaming everybody else. Shouldn't have got your hopes up so high, guys.</p><p>Now, there's no way that Republicans aren't going to have a good November in absolute terms. But a sign here and a sign there are starting to suggest that it might not be the stellar midterm that the minority party has been dreaming of and getting ready for. The president can point to some successes, with healthcare, financial reform and signs of economic recovery, for one thing. For another, it looks like we can count on Republicans to figure out a way to screw it up for themselves.</p><p>The latest example of Republicans finding an opportunity to miss an opportunity comes in Illinois. The Senate seat once held by Barack Obama is a major prize, and Republicans badly want to win. Everything seemed to line up just right. Democrats nominated a <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/02/03/giannoulias_kirk_illinois">damaged candidate</a> in state Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias, and scandal was hanging over the incumbent party anyway thanks to the collapse of the Rod Blagojevich administration. Republicans, meanwhile, got their dream nominee: Rep. Mark Kirk, from the Chicago suburbs, is the rare true suburban centrist Republican to survive the collapse of his wing of the party. He's staved off a couple of tough Democratic challenges, managing to become one of only seven Republicans to represent a district carried by John Kerry in 2004. In a state where moderate Republicans have thrived, but conservatives have been trounced repeatedly by mediocre Democratic hacks like Blagojevich, Kirk seemed to be just the ticket.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/gop_blows_senate_races/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/02/gop_blows_senate_races/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This week in pundits mistaking their assumptions for the national mood</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/this_week_in_being_wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/this_week_in_being_wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Sestak, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/28/this_week_in_being_wrong</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do Peggy Noonan, Cokie Roberts, and Chris Cillizza have in common? They invent their own "mainstream opinions"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Washington Post political reporter and analyst Chris Cillizza <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/thefix/white-house/how-the-sestak-job-offer-becam.html">explained, this morning, why the Sestak scandal was important:</a></p><blockquote>
<p>That the story has become a major controversy, a regular fixture on cable news chat shows and a momentum-killer for Sestak following his come-from behind victory against Specter in last week's Pennsylvania primary is evidence of how the White House mishandled the controversy, according to conversations with several high-level Democratic strategists.</p>
</blockquote><p>Indeed, Sestak has been hurt so badly that <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2010/5/26/PA/533">he currently leads his opponent by three points.</a> (Before this scandal destroyed his momemtum, Sestak trailed Toomey by five points.)</p><p>Elsewhere this morning, famous Republican opinion writer and Reagan speechwriter Peggy Noonan <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704269204575270950789108846.html">was fascinated by this important true fact about Barack Obama:</a></p><blockquote>
<p>What continues to fascinate me is Mr. Obama's standing with Democrats. They don't love him. Half the party voted for Hillary Clinton, and her people have never fully reconciled themselves to him. But he is what they have.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/this_week_in_being_wrong/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/28/this_week_in_being_wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even though he didn&#8217;t serve in Vietnam, Richard Blumenthal way ahead in poll</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/blumenthal_polls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/blumenthal_polls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/27/blumenthal_polls</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Vietnam mess hurt the Connecticut attorney general a little bit, but no one likes his opponent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the best efforts <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/feature/2010/05/26/new_york_times_blumenthal_omission/index.html">of the New York Times,</a> Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal (D) leads Linda McMahon, his Republican opponent for Chris Dodd's Senate seat, <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1296.xml?ReleaseID=1459">by 25 points in a new Quinnipiac poll.</a></p><p>Blumenthal's up 56 percent to 31 percent. Before the revelation that, on two or three occasions, Blumenthal made it sound like he served in Vietnam (and the equally shocking revelation that <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/05/21/blumenthal_correction/index.html">some people thought he was the captain of the Harvard swim team</a>), Blumenthal led 61-28. So he took a little bit of a hit.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/blumenthal_polls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/blumenthal_polls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New York Times&#8217; tactical Blumenthal omission</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/new_york_times_blumenthal_omission/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/new_york_times_blumenthal_omission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion//feature/2010/05/26/new_york_times_blumenthal_omission</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How the paper of record shook up Connecticut's U.S. Senate race with a bogus story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody's known somebody who invented a make-believe biography. It's always funny, often sad, occasionally pathological. I once knew a fellow who got into a standoff with cops who wanted him to submit to a DUI test. His girlfriend stood in the driveway crying. Poor X, she lamented, was still suffering from post-Vietnam combat flashbacks.</p><p>Fed up with X's antics, I gently suggested she do the arithmetic. He'd been in junior high when the war ended in 1975.</p><p>Long pause. "Oh my God," she said.</p><p>Oh my God, indeed. At first glance, it appeared that the New York Times had uncovered just such an impostor in Connecticut attorney general and Democratic U.S. Senate nominee Richard Blumenthal. In a potentially career-destroying front-page article, Times reporter Raymond Hernandez charged the candidate with repeatedly falsifying his military record to persuade audiences that he served in Vietnam, although he did not.</p><p>A Marine reservist, Blumenthal did most of his six years' service in Washington and New Haven. In one instance, the Times had the candidate dead to rights. "We have learned something important since the days that I served in Vietnam," Blumenthal told a 2008 Memorial Day gathering. "And you [veterans] exemplify it. Whatever we think about the war, whatever we call it -- Afghanistan or Iraq -- we owe our military men and women unconditional support."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/new_york_times_blumenthal_omission/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/27/new_york_times_blumenthal_omission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rob Simmons drops out in Connecticut</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/rob_simmons_withdraws/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/rob_simmons_withdraws/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/25/rob_simmons_withdraws</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOPer with the best shot at beating the scandal-damaged Richard Blumenthal suspends his campaign]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rob Simmons <a href="http://content.usatoday.com/communities/onpolitics/post/2010/05/senate-hopeful-simmons-withdraws-from-conn-gop-primary/1">is dropping out of the race for US Senate in Connecticut</a>. The Republican just doesn't have as much money as wrestling entrepreneur Linda McMahon.</p><p>The New York Times-fueled Richard Blumenthal scandal (on two or three occasions, Blumenthal spoke as if he'd served in Vietnam, when in fact he was serving stateside) left the door wide open for a credible challenger to the all-but-anointed successor to Chris Dodd. GOPer and former Representative Rob Simmons seemed perfectly positioned to take advantage of the situation, because he actually did serve, honorably, in Vietnam, while Linda was graduating college to work for her father-in-law's traveling wrestling show.</p><p>Alas, it did not work out for him.</p><p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/05/25/rep-simmons-suspends-campaign-senate-connecticut/?test=latestnews">Simmons won 46% of the vote at the convention</a>, but McMahon, who won, is the richest Senate candidate in the nation. Wealthy Connecticut elitist Ann Coulter <a href="http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=37091&amp;s=rcmp">is not happy with this turn of events.</a></p><p>Simmons is not officially ending his campaign, but he's effectively ceasing campaign activities.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/rob_simmons_withdraws/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/rob_simmons_withdraws/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Correction of the day, Richard Blumenthal edition</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/blumenthal_correction/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/blumenthal_correction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/21/blumenthal_correction</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Hartford Courant regrets the 30-year-old error]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <a href="http://www.courant.com/news/corrections/hc-hc-correct-0521.artmay21,0,2548063.story">From the Hartford Courant:</a>
  </p><blockquote>
<p>State Attorney General Richard Blumenthal was never captain of the Harvard University swim team. A 1978 Courant story incorrectly reported that he was -- an error repeated in subsequent Courant stories, including profiles in 1980 and 2004.</p>
</blockquote><p>[<a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/05/20/blumenthal_swim_team/index.html">Previously</a>]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/blumenthal_correction/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/blumenthal_correction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush lied about his military service, and so did Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/bushreagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/bushreagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/05/20/bushreagan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bush's account of his Guard service and Reagan's story of the Nazi death camp were huge lies -- but never big news]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard Blumenthal's apparent misstatements about his military service -- as reported so tendentiously in the New York Times -- have delighted Republicans who once considered the Connecticut attorney general unbeatable in his state's U.S. Senate race. Now that we know the videotape cited by the Times also includes Blumenthal accurately describing his service in the Marine Corps Reserve, their jubilation may be premature. Whatever the ultimate verdict on the Blumenthal story, however, it's worth noting that he was hardly alone in misstating -- or falsely recollecting -- the facts about his stint in uniform. Leaving aside Lindsey Graham, who has puffed his "wartime" service for years, such mythmaking is indeed characteristic of the politicians most revered by the GOP.&#160;</p><p>Take George W. Bush, whose controversial service as a Texas Air National Guard pilot was shrouded in mystery, evidently because he wanted to conceal the basic facts of his privileged admission to the TANG and his strange departure from its ranks. In his 2000 campaign autobiography, ghosted by Karen Hughes, Bush claimed that after completing his training in the F-102 fighter plane, "I continued flying with my unit for the next several years." That simple sentence was entirely untrue, according to records eventually released by the Bush campaign, which showed that he had never flown in uniform again after his suspension from active duty in August 1972 for failing to show up for a mandatory physical examination.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/bushreagan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/bushreagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blumenthal&#8217;s Harvard swim team claim: True!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/blumenthal_swim_team/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/blumenthal_swim_team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/20/blumenthal_swim_team</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So that's one thing he didn't sort of almost mislead people to believe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit of a good news/bad news situation for the Richard Blumenthal campaign today. The bad: <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/05/blumenthal_i_wore_the_uniform.html#more">The Stamford Advocate found another example of him</a> talking as if he'd been in Vietnam during the war. The good: He actually was on the Harvard swim team!</p><p>This was easily the weirdest part <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/nyregion/18blumenthal.html">of the original Times story</a> on Blumenthal:</p><blockquote>
<p>In two largely favorable profiles, the Slate article and a magazine article in The Hartford Courant in 2004 with which he cooperated, Mr. Blumenthal is described prominently as having served as captain of the swim team at Harvard. Records at the college show that he was never on the team.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/blumenthal_swim_team/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/blumenthal_swim_team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lindsey Graham&#8217;s war lie: Bigger than Richard Blumenthal&#8217;s</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/lindsey_graham_war_liar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/lindsey_graham_war_liar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/20/lindsey_graham_war_liar</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in the '90s, and even after he was caught in the fib, he led people to believe he'd served in the Gulf War]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long before he was the Senate's most powerful sometimes-moderate who won't support the climate bill he helped draft because of personal pique, Lindsey Graham was just another politician who <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201005190029">repeatedly lied about fighting in a war overseas.</a></p><p>According to <a href="http://lgraham.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=AboutSenatorGraham.Biography">his (current) official bio</a>, "Graham logged six-and-a-half years of service on active duty as an Air Force lawyer." After he left the active duty force, he joined the South Carolina Air National Guard. During the first Gulf War, Graham was called up to act as staff judge advocate at McEntire Air National Guard Base in South Carolina. As staff judge advocate, Graham's duties "included briefing pilots on the law of armed conflict, preparing legal documents for deploying troops, and providing legal services for family members of the South Carolina Air National Guard. " His service never took him out of South Carolina.</p><p>And so, naturally, for years afterward, Lindsey Graham referred to himself in his official biography and elsewhere as "an Operation Desert Shield and Desert Storm veteran."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/lindsey_graham_war_liar/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/lindsey_graham_war_liar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blumenthal drama a reminder that GOP can still win the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/democrats_senate_2010_elections_volatile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/democrats_senate_2010_elections_volatile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 13:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Sestak, D-Pa.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/05/20/democrats_senate_2010_elections_volatile</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is volatility in three Senate races that Democrats have long assumed they'd win]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was just a few weeks ago that Democrats let loose a collective sigh of relief. With the news that George Pataki and Tommy Thompson would both be passing on Senate campaigns, it <a href="http://politifi.com/news/Senate-Forecast-Update-Little-Chance-of-GOP-Takeover-but-Dem-Position-Remains-Precarious-514357.html">seemed just about impossible</a> mathematically for the GOP to win control of the Senate this fall.</p><p>But this week's Richard Blumenthal drama in Connecticut is bringing some apprehension back to the surface.</p><p>It remains to be seen whether Blumenthal, who entered his state's Senate race as a white knight poised to save his party from Chris Dodd's collapse, will sustain much permanent damage from a New York Times story that suggested he's embellished his military record. Blumenthal has mounted a vigorous defense and video has now emerged that shows him properly characterizing his service. The story may fizzle out and Blumenthal could return to his dominant position in the polls relatively unscathed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/democrats_senate_2010_elections_volatile/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/20/democrats_senate_2010_elections_volatile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linda McMahon campaign accidentally posts video of Blumenthal telling the truth</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/blumenthal_video_full/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/blumenthal_video_full/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/19/blumenthal_video_full</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a clip helpfully unearthed by his opponent, Richard Blumenthal accurately describes his military service]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Associated Press found <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/05/blumenthal_told_truth_on_same.html">the full video of Richard Blumenthal's 2008 speech</a> in which he claimed to served "in" Vietnam. In the same speech, though, he also correctly characterized his military service. You'll never guess where the AP found the video! (Unless you read the headline.)</p><p>The other night, the New York Times ran <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/18/nyregion/18blumenthal.html">what looked like a bombshell story</a>: Democratic Senate candidate Richard Blumenthal lied about serving in Vietnam. Except it really was more like Richard Blumenthal allowed people to believe he served in Vietnam, and once or twice he said things that could've been construed as claiming to have served there.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/blumenthal_video_full/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/blumenthal_video_full/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Richard Blumenthal drop out? And if he does, what happens?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/blumenthal_drop_out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/blumenthal_drop_out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/05/19/blumenthal_drop_out</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barring further revelations, Richard Blumenthal's probably the Democratic nominee for Senate. But if things change?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/election_2010_connecticut_senate">a Rasmussen phone survey released today</a>, Richard Blumenthal's lead over Republican opponent Linda McMahon has shrunk from 13 points to 3. All because he sometimes forgot he didn't actually serve <em>in</em> Vietnam, during the war there.</p><p>This is a Rasmussen poll, so it <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/04/use-of-likely-voter-model-does-not.html">might mean absolutely nothing.</a> (Unless you believe the liberal line against Rasmussen -- that its <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=DCAD6DDB-18FE-70B2-A8986E439331DA11">terribly conservative house effect is intentional</a> -- in which case it means that it's trying to push the "Blumenthal in trouble" narrative while the news is fresh.)</p><p>Today, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/19/nyregion/19veterans.html?src=me">the New York Times ran a follow-up</a> to its story about how every now and then Blumenthal encourages the belief that he fought in Vietnam. (One odd thing is that the story's main source is former Republican congressman Chris Shays, who claims to be very friendly with and admiring of Blumenthal. Shays was also seriously considering a run for the Senate seat himself as of last year.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/blumenthal_drop_out/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/19/blumenthal_drop_out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Good news for Democrats in Connecticut</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/14/blumenthal_lieberman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/14/blumenthal_lieberman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/01/14/blumenthal_lieberman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Party has a good shot at keeping Sen. Chris Dodd's seat, and picking up another down the road]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quinnipiac's out today with a new poll confirming results from one earlier survey that had been conducted by a Democratic firm: Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal is a heavy favorite to win the race for Sen. Chris Dodd's seat, in a much better position than Dodd would have been.</p><p>In a nod to the presence of World Wrestling Entertainment executive Linda McMahon in the race, Quinnipiac says: "Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal has 35 to 47-point leads over three Republican candidates for the 2010 U.S. Senate contest, thumping former wrestling executive Linda McMahon 64 &#8211; 23 percent, bruising businessman Peter Schiff 66 &#8211; 19 percent and smacking former U.S. Rep. Rob Simmons 62 &#8211; 27 percent."</p><p>Many Democrats, though, will be even happier to hear some other results from the same poll. It shows Connecticut residents losing faith in the state's other senator, independent Joe Lieberman. His approval rating is at a dismal 39 percent, 10 percentage points off what it was as recently as November, with 54 percent of respondents saying they disapprove of the job he's doing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/14/blumenthal_lieberman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/14/blumenthal_lieberman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Democrats aren&#8217;t dead yet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/06/sky_not_falling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/06/sky_not_falling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 22:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Dodd, D-Conn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/01/06/sky_not_falling</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuesday's retirement news may look worse than it really is for this year's elections]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the White House Wednesday, press secretary Robert Gibbs wasn't about to play political prophet.</p><p>"Look, it is hard to look into the crystal ball 11 months from Election Day," Gibbs said. Hard -- and also, if you're a Democrat these days, a little scary. The surprising news Tuesday night that Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., wouldn't run again was followed not long afterward by the slightly less surprising news that his Connecticut counterpart Chris Dodd would join him in retirement. Colorado Gov. Bill Ritter announced his retirement, too, and just for good measure, Michigan Lt. Gov. John Cherry said he would sit out the 2010 election as well. Republicans and the media alike declared the sky was falling for the Obama administration and the Democratic Party.</p><p>"The real question is whether Harry Reid, now the Senate's most vulnerable Democrat, will follow Chris Dodd's lead and step aside," Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said in a statement. (Take this one to Vegas, in Reid's home state -- he won't.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/06/sky_not_falling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/06/sky_not_falling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lieberman may have serious challenger</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/lieberman_32/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/lieberman_32/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Blumenthal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/02/04/lieberman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal is reportedly considering a Senate run against his state's "Independent Democrat."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman had a tough time winning reelection in 2006; in order to do it, after being defeated in the Democratic primary, he had to run as an independent. The road ahead of him in 2012 might not be any easier, as one of the state's prominent Democrats is <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/connecticut-attorney-general-eyes-lieberman-challenge-2009-02-03.html">reportedly</a> considering taking a run at Lieberman's seat.</p><p>State Attorney&#160;General Richard Blumenthal, the Hill <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/connecticut-attorney-general-eyes-lieberman-challenge-2009-02-03.html">reports</a>, "has begun informing influential members of the state's political class that he will prepare for a run against Lieberman." The Hartford Courant <a href="http://www.courant.com/news/politics/hc-blumenthal0203.artfeb03,0,6177904.story">notes</a> that Blumenthal has always coveted a Senate seat, but his path to one had long been blocked by the presence of two Democrats -- Lieberman and Chris Dodd -- in the state's delegation. With Lieberman now an independent who only caucuses with the Democrats, it's no longer taboo to challenge him.</p><p>The news was especially interesting to me because I covered the end of the 2006 primary between Lieberman and Ned Lamont, and <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/08/09/lieberman/index1.html">met</a> Blumenthal at Lieberman headquarters that night. At the time, he supported the incumbent. He eventually endorsed Lamont, but that was essentially mandatory after Lamont's primary victory, and has apparently remained friends with the senator. So it's interesting to see him considering a campaign.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/lieberman_32/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/02/04/lieberman_32/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

