<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Richard Mourdock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/richard_mourdock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 01:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Karl Rove: We don&#8217;t want to fight the Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/karl_rove_we_dont_want_to_fight_the_tea_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/karl_rove_we_dont_want_to_fight_the_tea_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Crossroads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Walsh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13192339</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rove defends his Super PAC, but Tea Partyers see things differently]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl Rove argued on Tuesday that his Super PAC is not really trying to start a war with the Tea Party, and that it's just a matter of trying to find stronger candidates than Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock.</p><p>“This is not Tea Party versus the establishment,” Rove said on Fox News. “I don’t want a fight.”</p><p>"Some people think the best we can do is Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock. They’re wrong. We need to do better if we hope to take over the United States Senate. We need to get better conservative candidates and win," he continued.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><object id="flashObj" width="400" height="225" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=2145699511001&amp;playerID=1409164951001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAAETmrZQ~,EVFEM4AKJdRjek0MS21pRzf_GTDAM-xj&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoId=2145699511001&amp;playerID=1409164951001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAAETmrZQ~,EVFEM4AKJdRjek0MS21pRzf_GTDAM-xj&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="swliveconnect" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="pluginspage" value="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" /><embed id="flashObj" width="400" height="225" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9?isVid=1" flashvars="videoId=2145699511001&amp;playerID=1409164951001&amp;playerKey=AQ~~,AAAAAETmrZQ~,EVFEM4AKJdRjek0MS21pRzf_GTDAM-xj&amp;domain=embed&amp;dynamicStreaming=true" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" seamlesstabbing="false" allowfullscreen="true" swliveconnect="true" allowscriptaccess="always"></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/karl_rove_we_dont_want_to_fight_the_tea_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/06/karl_rove_we_dont_want_to_fight_the_tea_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tea Party alone didn&#8217;t cripple the GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/the_tea_party_alone_didnt_cripple_the_gop_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/the_tea_party_alone_didnt_cripple_the_gop_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13190349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Establishment Republicans can't keep blaming their party's troubles on its extremist fringe]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> When Republicans began 2012, the Senate was within in their grasp—Democrats were defending a huge number of seats, and several incumbents, like Claire McCaskill of Missouri, were deeply unpopular. They finished it, however, with a smaller minority than anyone could have predicted. Obviously, this was a huge defeat for the GOP, and blame for it has fallen on two particular candidates—Richard Mourdock in Indiana and Todd Akin in Missouri—who represent the failures and excesses of Tea Party conservatism.</p><p>In an effort to avoid a repeat of this in 2014, establishment Republicans have begun an effort to recruit more pliable candidates—ones who won’t sink GOP odds with ill-considered words on rape and women’s health. According to The New York Times, the “Conservative Victory Project” is “intended to counter other organizations that have helped defeat establishment Republican candidates over the last two election cycles. It is the most robust attempt yet by Republicans to impose a new sense of discipline on the party, particularly in primary races.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/the_tea_party_alone_didnt_cripple_the_gop_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/the_tea_party_alone_didnt_cripple_the_gop_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could Rove&#8217;s new effort backfire?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/could_roves_new_effort_backfire/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/could_roves_new_effort_backfire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pat Toomey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim DeMint]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13190132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stopping the next Todd Akin could be a lot trickier than GOP elites think]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/03/us/politics/top-gop-donors-seek-greater-say-in-senate-races.html?pagewanted=2&amp;smid=tw-share&amp;pagewanted=all&amp;_r=0">New York Times reported over the weekend</a>, Karl Rove and the donors behind the American Crossroads super PAC are launching an effort to prevent any more Todd Akins and Richard Mourdocks from winning Republican nominations in key races. That news prompted immediate scorn from forces on the right that have been crucial to the success of anti-establishment candidates in GOP primaries in the past two election cycles.</p><p>“They are welcome to support the likes of Arlen Specter, Charlie Crist and David Dewhurst,” Barney Keller, the spokesman for the Club for Growth, <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/conservative-groups-mock-crossroads-effort-87101.html#ixzz2Jvrq6XH4">told Politico</a> on Sunday.  “We will continue to proudly support the likes of Pat Toomey, Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz.”</p><p>This points to an open question about the new Rove effort, which is being called the Conservative Victory Project: What criteria will it use to determine who is and isn’t electable?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/could_roves_new_effort_backfire/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/04/could_roves_new_effort_backfire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Would-be judge suggests rape victims &#8220;enjoy it&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/would_be_judge_suggests_rape_victims_enjoy_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/would_be_judge_suggests_rape_victims_enjoy_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 18:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual assault]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13173105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And why did the Indonesian Supreme Court hopeful say women "enjoy" being sexually violated? To "break the ice" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you thought the U.S. Congress had a monopoly on saying incendiary, idiotic things about rape, think again.</p><p>Daming Sanusi, a candidate for the Indonesian Supreme Court, has <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/16/world/asia/indonesia-rape-comments-controversy/index.html?hpt=hp_t3" target="_blank">sparked widespread outrage</a> by suggesting that rape victims "enjoy" being sexually assaulted.</p><p>In front of a parliamentary commission hearing to determine if he was fit for the high court, Sanusi was asked whether he believed the death penalty should be applied in rape cases. His response? "Consideration needs to be taken thoroughly for the imposition of death penalty for a rapist because in a rape case both the rapist and the victim enjoy it," CNN <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/16/world/asia/indonesia-rape-comments-controversy/index.html?hpt=hp_t3" target="_blank">reported</a>.</p><p>And <em>why</em> did he say something so colossally stupid?</p><p>He was nervous and wanted to "break the ice" with a "joke": "I made the remark without realizing it can harm people's feeling," Antara, the Indonesian news agency, quoted him as saying.</p><p>News of Sanusi's comments spread quickly through social media, prompting calls for officials to dismiss his candidacy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/would_be_judge_suggests_rape_victims_enjoy_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/would_be_judge_suggests_rape_victims_enjoy_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House Republicans&#8217; new Todd Akin moment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/house_republicans_new_todd_akin_moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/house_republicans_new_todd_akin_moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Violence Against Women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-abortion movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeanne Shaheen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans are considering killing a measure that would give raped female soldiers free access to abortions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there’s one thing this election taught us, it’s that fighting against abortion in the case of rape should be avoided at all costs. And yet, Republicans may come back for another serving of Todd Akin’s humble pie.</p><p>Right now, if you’re a woman in the military, which has startlingly high rates of sexual assault, and you get raped, you face the added insult of having to pay for an abortion out of your own pocket. That’s because the military's health insurance plan is the only one in the federal government that does not cover abortion in the case of rape or incest. It'll only cover the procedure if the woman's life is in danger</p><p>Democrats in the Senate have tried to change this, but House Republicans have so far resisted, thus producing two different bills -- one with the change and one without. Yesterday, the House named its representatives to a bicameral committee that will hammer out the differences between the two bills, including this provision. While killing the amendment could reignite the explosive abortion and rape debate of the summer, Republicans generally oppose the expansion of reproductive rights, even for raped female soldiers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/house_republicans_new_todd_akin_moment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/house_republicans_new_todd_akin_moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The fake cure for Akin-ism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/the_fake_cure_for_akin_ism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/the_fake_cure_for_akin_ism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tommy Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Chocola]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104617</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican establishment's plan to avoid a repeat of the Todd Akin debacle ignores the real problem]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s no denying that Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock were embarrassments for the Republican Party in 2012, and that their nominations cost the GOP otherwise winnable Senate seats and complicated its efforts to take back the chamber. Similarly, there’s no doubt that Christine O’Donnell and Sharron Angle and Ken Buck were embarrassments for the GOP in 2010 and lost races that should have been gimmes for the party.</p><p>But a fight is breaking out on the right over the precise significance of these defeats, and what can be done to avoid a repeat in 2014.</p><p>In the wake of this month’s election, the outgoing chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, Texas Sen. John Cornyn, <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1112/83893.html">suggested</a> the committee might junk its <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/glennthrush/1109/Cornyn_NRSC_wont_play_in_primaries.html">hands-off approach</a> to Republican primaries going forward.</p><p>“What is the goal here?” he asked. “I think the goal is to elect principled conservatives in November, not just nominate somebody in the primary that has very little chance of getting elected in November. That doesn’t advance the conservative agenda, because you have to get elected before you can govern.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/the_fake_cure_for_akin_ism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/the_fake_cure_for_akin_ism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Worse than the Tea Party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/republicans_problems_are_bigger_than_the_tea_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/republicans_problems_are_bigger_than_the_tea_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2012 17:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missouri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13102842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP is blaming Akin and Mourdock for its blowout Senate defeat. It might want to look at its policies instead]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> If there was anything Republicans should have been surprised about in this month’s elections, it was their rout in the Senate. Not only did they lose races against vulnerable Democratic incumbents in GOP leaning states—Missouri, Florida, and Montana, for instance—but they also lost almost every competitive open race and failed to hold a vacant one in Indiana.</p><p><em>Politico</em> <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=B72FEC3F-ED86-4968-9991-994E3ECD874B">reports</a> that GOP leaders are working to prevent a repeat of this scenario by exerting more control over the nomination process. Republicans believe that they would have done better had they kept politicians like Todd Akin and Richard Mourdock out of the picture. The goal for the next four years is to erase the Tea Party-versus-Washington narrative that has made it difficult to get establishment Republicans through the primary process:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/republicans_problems_are_bigger_than_the_tea_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/19/republicans_problems_are_bigger_than_the_tea_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 glaring contradictions that sank the GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/5_glaring_contradictions_that_sank_the_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/5_glaring_contradictions_that_sank_the_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 14:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13099193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans will point to the country's shifting demographics, but they ultimately have only themselves to blame]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Enough uplifting, all-purpose notions of why Obama and Democrats prevailed, some pertinent (like demographics), many laughable: it was Sandy the storm, tons of “stuff” Obama promised, or Democratic voter repression (right!). “No, no,” disbelievers shout, “Mitt was too moderate, or too extreme, his V.P. too fixated.” Or Obama was simply superior on the stump. Below such media noise rumbles a larger tectonic, thus my nomination for what made this election significant: a gang of rightwing contradictions reared up, then crashed and burned.</p><p>While this trend transcends any one folly, Romney was the ideal, fossilized Republican awash in a fantasy golden age when bountiful bosses generated jobs and pampered laborers. Likewise, what bizarre political deviance tabbed Paul Ryan as more than a shrill ideologue with zero national clout? For the first time, both misfits atop a national ticket lost their home states. Remarkably, even that matchless twosome, McCain-Palin, outpolled (and outwinked) the votes to Romney-Ryan.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/5_glaring_contradictions_that_sank_the_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/15/5_glaring_contradictions_that_sank_the_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bush adviser threatens to cut out Republicans&#8217; tongues</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/karen_hughes_ill_cut_out_the_tongue_of_any_goper_making_rape_comments/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/karen_hughes_ill_cut_out_the_tongue_of_any_goper_making_rape_comments/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karen Hughes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Karen Hughes doesn't want to hear "anything about rape other than it is a horrific, violent crime"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/11/karen-hughes-ill-cut-out-the-tongue-of-gopers-talking-149146.html#.UJ-w3nB_g9g.twitter">Op-Ed</a> for Politico, former George W. Bush adviser Karen Hughes writes that Republicans need to learn from their 2012 losses and "set a tone that is more respectful, positive and inclusive."</p><p>"And," Hughes continues, "if another Republican man says anything about rape other than it is a horrific, violent crime, I want to personally cut out his tongue. The college-age daughters of many of my friends voted for Obama because they were completely turned off by Neanderthal comments like the suggestion of 'legitimate rape.'"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/karen_hughes_ill_cut_out_the_tongue_of_any_goper_making_rape_comments/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/karen_hughes_ill_cut_out_the_tongue_of_any_goper_making_rape_comments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still want to fight a war on women?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/a_womans_place/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/a_womans_place/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tammy Baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13065044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren and Tammy Baldwin win; Akin and Mourdock are defeated. But it's no time for women to be complacent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of weeks ago, three words were <a href="http://upsettingrapeculture.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">projected</a> on the U.S. Capitol by a feminist group: "Rape is rape." It was momentous, but only to a point.</p><p>After all, by then President Obama had already <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57496599-503544/akin-apologizes-for-rape-comments-obama-says-rape-is-rape-/" target="_blank">repeated</a> that feminist mantra rejecting a hierarchy of rape: In August, he'd announced that "Rape is rape" in response to Todd Akin's blithe invocation of "legitimate rape." Three days after the words appeared on the Capitol, Indiana Senate candidate Richard Mourdock's talk of rape and God's gifts <a href="http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/10/obama-on-mourdock-rape-is-rape-147149.html" target="_blank">gave</a> the president occasion to say it again. <em>Rape is rape.</em> You could complain that this was still being debated in 2012, and many did, but why would profound disruption come fast or easy? No, it was an urgent dividing point, and the president himself had chosen a side.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/a_womans_place/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/a_womans_place/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;ve never been more hopeful&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liveblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic Novel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dirty tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Panthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[108 year old first voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exit Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exit Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Rolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Panther]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robo-calls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay-Z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liveblog: The president eloquently accepts a second term of office -- and vows to build on the progress we've made]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you seeing and hearing in your state and at the polling place? Send information and photos to readermail@salon.com.</p><p>[liveblog id=38]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten Senate races too close to call</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/ten_senate_races_too_close_to_call/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/ten_senate_races_too_close_to_call/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 17:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nevada]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13064071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Richard Mourdock's hideous rape remarks enable Democrats to retain their narrow majority?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Democrats currently hold 51 Senate seats to the GOP's 47, with two Independent senators voting with the Democrats. Here's a quick rundown on the various close Senate races across the country. Polls don't start closing until the evening on Tuesday, but news, gossip and exit polls will start to surface in the hours ahead. This article will be updated regularly.</p><p><strong>1. Indiana Senate </strong>: Republican state Treasurer Richard Mourdock (R) vs. Rep. Joe Donnelly (D). The most recent serious poll in Indiana shows that Donnelly has jumped ahead of Mourdock by <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2012/senate/in/indiana_senate_mourdock_vs_donnelly-3166.html">3 points, 45-42. </a>Pundits are saying that if the GOP can't win this seat, GOP chances of taking the Senate are somewhere between slim and none.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/ten_senate_races_too_close_to_call/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/ten_senate_races_too_close_to_call/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dirty Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 02:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rep. Steve King]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anti-choice, pro-gun, you name it. Eight Democrats who want -- but don't deserve -- your vote tomorrow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This hasn't been a great year for progressive causes. Whether you're a woman, an immigrant, an environmentalist or a person who doesn't want to be killed by a gun (the list goes on), the 112th Congress was pretty much a disaster.</p><p>And while it's extremists like Richard Mourdock, Rep. Todd Akin, R-Mo., and Rep. Steve King, R-Iowa, who received progressives’ derision for saying (and voting for) completely off-the-wall stuff, plenty of Democrats got in on the rape-denying, gun-loving, science-hating action, too. While these Blue Dogs might not want to repeal health care reform (well, except when they <a href="http://votesmart.org/candidate/key-votes/57769/larry-kissell">do</a>), their records should still give you pause. Here are eight conservative Democrats who are hurting their party <em>and</em> their country -- but still want your vote.</p><p>[slide_show id=13063497]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/06/dirty_democrats_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misogyny will cost the GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/will_stances_on_women_cost_gop_the_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/will_stances_on_women_cost_gop_the_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2012 05:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Loose talk on women's issues like abortion and birth control isn't helping Republicans -- especially in the Senate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if misogyny ends up costing Republicans the Senate? Judging by the polls in the final days before the election, this is not a crazy proposition -- especially if "gaffes" on abortion, rape and contraception are equated by the electorate with extremism, repelling even ideologically sympathetic voters.</p><p>Just look at Indiana, a state that is choosing between two "pro-life" candidates, one of whom is a Democrat who has voted for House Republicans' most restrictive legislation on reproductive rights. Still, Joe Donnelly managed to avoid doing what Richard Mourdock did -- <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/richard_mourdock_misogynist/">getting famous</a> for talking insensitively about rape. They've been tied or within inches of each other for weeks, but as of today, the first post-rape-comment <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/poll-mourdock-now-down-11-points-in-indiana">poll</a>, Mourdock is down 11 points. Meanwhile, Mourdock's rape-talking fellow traveler in Missouri, Senate candidate Todd Akin, is locked in a race that was never supposed to be competitive, and a<a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/265485-akin-gathering-steam-in-race-against-mccaskill"> cash infusion</a> may come too late to save him. And in Connecticut and Massachusetts, both abortion and contraception have been used to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/birth_control_extremism_comes_back_to_bite_gop/">pummel</a> relatively moderate Republicans with the ever-rightward agenda of the national party, and for that reason and more, it's looking like Democrats will prevail.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/will_stances_on_women_cost_gop_the_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/03/will_stances_on_women_cost_gop_the_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Akin and Mourdock double down on rape talk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/akin_and_mourdock_double_down_on_rape_talk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/akin_and_mourdock_double_down_on_rape_talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2012 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13060669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the election draws near, two candidates deploy women to preach their disturbing antiabortion message]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Election Day fast approaches, two of the most controversial GOP candidates this year have chosen to double down on their most incendiary stances on sexual violence and women's reproductive freedom — by using women themselves to shill for them.</p><p>First, there's Missouri Senate candidate Todd Akin. You remember Akin, the guy who really got the right-wingers-saying-insane-things-about-rape ball rolling back in August. That's when he explained his stance on rape exceptions for abortion by authoratively declaring, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/28/todd_akin_right_wing_hero/ ">"If it's a legitimate rape,</a> the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down." Akin, who is now trailing his opponent Claire McCaskill – though not by as much as one might expect for a hulking ignoramus – has now unleashed a new ad featuring voters like Kelly, a single mother who says she's both had an abortion and "been raped in my past." Kelly goes on to say she's voting for Akin because he <a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/01/abortion-rape-focus-of-new-akin-ad-new-funding-a-mystery/ ">"defends the unborn."</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/akin_and_mourdock_double_down_on_rape_talk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/02/akin_and_mourdock_double_down_on_rape_talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP candidates put their moms to work</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/parent_trap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/parent_trap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connie Mack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Smith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Advertisements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13059197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans' go-to talking heads: Their moms (and dad)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The political conventions were not the high water mark of family marshaled for political theatrics. You may have thought that the peak of pandering was Ann Romney shouting, "I love you women!" and Michelle Obama's repeated self-designation as "mom-in-chief." In fact, if you're a Republican, it's <a href="http://influencealley.nationaljournal.com/2012/10/the-breakout-star-of-2012-momm.php">enlisting</a> your mother or grandmother to promise that nothing is going to happen to your Medicare -- unless it's Obama looting it.</p><p>It's not easy being a down-ticket Republican with Paul Ryan a notch below the top. Democrats got plenty of leverage early in the fall pointing out Ryan's plans to voucherize Medicare and past designs on Social Security. As compiled in a <a href="http://influencealley.nationaljournal.com/2012/10/the-breakout-star-of-2012-momm.php">roundup</a> by the National Journal, the senate and House candidates who trot out their mothers (and to a far lesser extent, their fathers) to, well, vouch for them respond using the same discredited <a href="http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2012/aug/15/checking-facts-700-billion-medicare-cut/">line</a> that Romney-Ryan have: That it's Obamacare, not the Republicans, that are a real danger to Medicare.  And who is more credible than a sweet, white-haired lady who conveniently might double as a salve to the gender gap?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/parent_trap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/parent_trap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Republican Party is Richard Mourdock</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/why_the_gop_will_draw_the_wrong_lessons_from_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/why_the_gop_will_draw_the_wrong_lessons_from_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legitimate rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13054000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn't matter how many extreme candidates crash and burn. Republicans never seem to learn their lesson]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the polls hold up, the biggest surprise of this election cycle will certainly be Democrats holding the Senate – and very possibly even adding to their majority.</p><p>I know what you’re thinking: Todd Akin, Richard Mourdock (pictured with Mitt Romney above) and their unfortunate habit of making comments about rape that drive voters away. No doubt, that’s a part of what’s happened to the Republicans in this cycle.</p><p>But as much as Republicans have a real nominations problem, one which probably will cost them more than just those two seats in this cycle, I see no sign at all that the party is going to learn any useful lessons from it. The problem is that the scope of the likely defeat is so broad that everyone is going to be able to find convenient targets for blame.</p><p>Remember, this was going to be an election cycle that set up very nicely for Republicans. Because we’re six years out from the 2006 Democratic landslide, the Democrats had to defend 23 seats while only 10 Republicans were up for re-election. Impending Democratic retirements in Nebraska and North Dakota made it seem that getting the three seats needed to reach 50 would be automatic, with the only question being whether Republicans could get close enough that 60 seats after 2014 would be well within reach.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/why_the_gop_will_draw_the_wrong_lessons_from_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/27/why_the_gop_will_draw_the_wrong_lessons_from_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s rape insanity is the norm</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/gops_insane_rape_remarks_arent_outliers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/gops_insane_rape_remarks_arent_outliers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 13:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Mandel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13053202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock and Todd Akin are representative of their party's increasingly deranged platform]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> With all of the excitement attending the recent <a href="http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/romneys-senate-candidate-pregnancy-rape-gods-will">comments</a> of Richard Mourdock, the Indiana Republican candidate for U.S. Senate, that a pregnancy conceived in rape is “a gift from God,” much of the political class is shaking its collective head at the refusal of presidential candidate Mitt Romney to revoke his endorsement of Mourdock -- or at least to pull his endorsement ad for the former state treasurer from the Hoosier state airwaves. What they’ve missed is the fact that, in the Republican Party of today, Mourdock’s position is the new normal.</p><p>Even Romney’s running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan, held a no-exceptions abortion stance -- at least until Romney, who would allow exceptions for rape and incest, elevated him to the national ticket. As <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2012/08/paul-ryan-rape-incest-abortion.php">reported</a> by TPM:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/gops_insane_rape_remarks_arent_outliers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/26/gops_insane_rape_remarks_arent_outliers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s binders full of offensive rape remarks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/binders_full_of_offensive_rape_remarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/binders_full_of_offensive_rape_remarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13051843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senate candidate Richard Mourdock is just the latest to make headlines. Why the right-wing can't help themselves]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> Another week, another offensive comment about women, sex, consent and abortion. We’re getting numb to it by now; a candidate or public figure says something alarming that shows a basic misunderstanding of female anatomy, the nature of rape or the realities of abortion. Everyone gets upset, the person in question semi-backtracks, we realize how awful his policy agenda is, and then the next comment comes down the pipeline.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org/8-worst-things-republicans-have-said-about-rape-sex-and-womens-bodies?paging=off">This has been the year </a>of “aspirin between the knees” and “legitimate rape,” the month of “some girls rape easy” and the awful, false claims that pregnancies are <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/10/22/no-life-saving-abortions-lie-and-why-it-persists">never life-threatening from Rep. Joe Walsh </a> (even after his colleague testified about her own life-threatening pregnancy on the House floor last year). This is the year that women in the military "should expect to be raped," the year of “abortions on women who aren’t pregnant” zombie myth, the year of maybe we should reconsider  <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/10/17/anti-choice-social-media-guy-baffled-over-why-people-might-support-an-exception-a">incest exceptions to abortion bans </a>. And now we have <a href="http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/indiana-gop-senate-candidates-mind-blowing-comment-pregnancy-rape-gods-will?akid=9578.200602.-D4mqJ&amp;rd=1&amp;src=newsletter732160&amp;t=14">Richard Mourdock saying pregnancy by rape is "God’s will. </a>”So here’s the question: why do they keep saying these things? It’s 2012, and these statements about rape, abortion and sex are actually really energizing for their opposition--they pull middle-of-the road voters away from the group they see as “extreme” and toward Democrats, who seem more reasonable, understandable and moderate on social issues. So why does ill-advised stream-of-consciousness ranting continue?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/binders_full_of_offensive_rape_remarks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/binders_full_of_offensive_rape_remarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama slams Mourdock on Leno: &#8220;Rape is rape&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/obama_slams_mourdock_on_leno_rape_is_rape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/obama_slams_mourdock_on_leno_rape_is_rape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Leno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13051660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I don’t know how these guys come up with these ideas," Obama told Jay Leno]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama appeared on "The Tonight Show," and addressed Richard Mourdock's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/gop_senate_candidate_pregnancy_from_rape_is_something_that_god_intended/">comments</a> that pregnancy from  rape "is something that God intended to happen."</p><p>“I don’t know how these guys come up with these ideas,” Obama told Jay Leno. “Let me make a very simple proposition. Rape is rape. It is a crime. And so these various distinctions about rape don’t make too much sense to me, don’t make any sense to me. The second thing this underscores, though, is this is exactly why you don’t want a bunch of politicians, mostly male, making decisions about women’s healthcare decisions.”</p><p>On Donald Trump, Obama joked that they knew each other growing up in Kenya: “We had constant run-ins on the soccer field. He wasn’t very good, resented it. When we finally moved to America, I thought it would be over.”</p><p><iframe src="http://www.nbc.com/assets/video/widget/widget.html?vid=1421841" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><iframe src="http://www.nbc.com/assets/video/widget/widget.html?vid=1421833" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/obama_slams_mourdock_on_leno_rape_is_rape/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/25/obama_slams_mourdock_on_leno_rape_is_rape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
