<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Richard Nixon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/richard_nixon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 01:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>On freedom of speech, Obama-Nixon comparisons are apt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/on_freedom_of_speech_obama_nixon_comparisons_are_apt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/on_freedom_of_speech_obama_nixon_comparisons_are_apt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transparency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leaks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whistleblowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[james rosen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bradley Manning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comparing Benghazi and the IRS flap to Watergate is wrong, but on First Amendment issues this president disappoints]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Other than reflecting a partisan assailant's lack of creativity, Nixon metaphors and -gate suffixes are so overused in politics that they now most often mean almost nothing. Yes, to call someone "Nixonian" or to invoke Watergate in naming a scandal is typically less a serious substantive critique of an opponent than a reflection of the critic's laziness and stupidity.</p><p>"Most often" and "typically," though, are the operative words these days. While I'm obviously hesitant to invoke the 37th president terms for the aforementioned reasons -- and while I agree with my Salon colleague <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/">Alex Pareene</a> and my pal <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/recent_scandals_are_whitewater_redux_not_watergate/">Steve Almond</a> that the IRS and Benghazi brouhahas most certainly do not warrant Nixon references -- I do believe Nixon's legacy is nonetheless applicable to the revelations about the Obama administration's posture toward press freedom.</p><p>Those particular revelations, of course, aren't happening in a vacuum. Instead, they relate to an administration whose known obsessions suggest this is part of a larger, dare I say Nixonian, pathology -- one defined by a hostility toward the most basic democratic ideals.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/on_freedom_of_speech_obama_nixon_comparisons_are_apt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/on_freedom_of_speech_obama_nixon_comparisons_are_apt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aloof, shifty Obama: Nixon times ten thousand!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 15:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Maureen Dowd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denis McDonough]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Carney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13304110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our evil president managed to both mastermind the IRS flap and be such a bad boss that no one told him about it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/politico44/2013/05/senior-wh-staff-knew-of-irs-investigation-did-not-164378.html">According to Jay Carney</a>, everyone in the White House knew about the big IRS scandal for a few weeks before it went public. Everyone except the president because this whole month has been a season-long plot arc on HBO's "Veep." (Speaking of, where's Joe Biden been lately?) Everyone was afraid to tell their boss about this dumb thing the IRS did, and then he learned about it on the news, and now he is probably <em>super</em> pissed.</p><p>Clearly Obama is a horrible boss, and the White House is a toxic work environment, probably, where people are afraid to report bad news to their superiors. <em>Just like Nixon, times ten thousand.</em></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/21/aloof_shifty_obama_nixon_times_ten_thousand/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s Nixon moment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/obamas_nixon_moment_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/obamas_nixon_moment_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel Maddow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greta Van Susteren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299596</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Embroiled in multiple scandals at once, the president is drawing cross-party criticism unseen since Watergate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a> BUZZARDS BAY, Mass. — When TV news rivals <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/on-the-record/index.html" target="_blank">Greta Van Susteren</a> and <a href="http://www.nbcnews.com/id/26315908/ns/msnbc_tv-rachel_maddow_show/vp/51872612#51872612" target="_blank">Rachel Maddow</a> are beating the same political drum, something is very wrong in Washington.</p><p>The Barack Obama administration finds itself under attack from both the left and the right this week as it struggles to deal with three major scandals: the news that the Department of Justice had staged an unprecedented raid on The Associated Press’ phone records; the revelation that the Internal Revenue Service has been targeting right-wing groups; and the ongoing fallout from the September attack in Benghazi, Libya.</p><p>It is the AP story that has most galvanized the media, threatening to disrupt the generally sympathetic coverage that the White House has enjoyed from large swaths of the press.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/obamas_nixon_moment_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/obamas_nixon_moment_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The 21 fiercest things Richard Nixon ever did</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/the_21_fiercest_things_richard_nixon_ever_did/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/the_21_fiercest_things_richard_nixon_ever_did/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Powerful, moving images of Richard Nixon that will restore every true late-'60s/early-'70s kid's faith in humanity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I guess <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/bennyjohnson/ronald-reagan-yolo">Reagan was an <em>OK</em> president</a> if you like played-out memes and whatever, but every Tru Post-War Kid knows the master of presidential IDGAF was Richard "Everything's Coming up" Milhous Nixon.</strong></p><p><strong>21. The time he hung out with Elvis in the Oval Office</strong></p><p><a href="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/5364-04.jpg"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/5364-04.jpg" alt="" title="Nixon elvis" class="size-full wp-image-13298914" height="430" width="650" /></a></p><p>"Hey Elvis they should call them tranquLOLizers right?"</p><p><strong>20. The time Richard Nixon was the original The Dude.</strong></p><p><a href="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/marac_gmu5.jpg"><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/05/marac_gmu5.jpg" alt="" title="Nixon elvis" class="size-full wp-image-13298914" /></a></p><p><strong>19. More like SWAG IT TO ME</strong></p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/KFEhmF-cSi8" frameborder="0" width="420" height="315"></iframe></p><p><strong>18. The time he <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S4UEv_jjPL0">told off</a> his dog's haters</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/the_21_fiercest_things_richard_nixon_ever_did/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/the_21_fiercest_things_richard_nixon_ever_did/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blame Citizens United for the IRS scandal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/blame_citizens_united_for_the_irs_scandal_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/blame_citizens_united_for_the_irs_scandal_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 15:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patriot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cincinnati]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13299326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real outrage is why these political groups have tax-exempt status in the first place]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, I’m not going to defend the IRS, which appears to have acted in ways wholly inconsistent with their mandate for unbiased investigations into, in this case, whether certain political groups should receive tax-exempt status.  It is unclear how high up the chain of command these untoward actions went, but this morning’s <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-denounces-reported-irs-targeting-of-conservative-groups/2013/05/13/a0185644-bbdf-11e2-97d4-a479289a31f9_story.html">news</a> suggests it wasn’t just a few rogue auditors in Cincinnati.</p><p>The problem wasn’t that the agency scrutinized these so-called “social welfare” organizations—as I’ll emphasize in a moment, tax law in this area is an accident going out to happen.  It’s that they violated neutrality, investigating conservative groups by searching on “tea party” and “patriot.”</p><p>Republicans will of course try to pin this on the President, despite the fact that since Nixon used the IRS to target his enemies, the president’s been barred from even discussing this kind of thing with the agency.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/blame_citizens_united_for_the_irs_scandal_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/blame_citizens_united_for_the_irs_scandal_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 5 investigative videos of the week: Some rich people are just jerks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/top_5_investigative_videos_of_the_week_some_rich_people_are_just_jerks_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/top_5_investigative_videos_of_the_week_some_rich_people_are_just_jerks_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 May 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Top 5 investigative videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The I Files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Garment Factories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Park Avenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monopoly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13295705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the penthouses of Park Avenue to the sweatshops of Bangladesh, a look at the finest docs YouTube has to offer ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rigged Monopoly, secret agents, mysterious tattoos and one glum Ghost of Gun Control all make an appearance in this week’s top investigative videos.</p><p>For a first look at the best news stories and documentaries from around the world, please take a moment to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdmqkUIfXt2cMBOLQsijMFg?sub_confirmation=1">subscribe to The I Files</a>, a totally free and carefully curated news source. We pore over hundreds of hours of videos so you don’t have to and highlight the best stories you might have missed. We don’t mind – it’s what we do.</p><p>Incidentally, The I Files editorial team totally shares the snacks whenever we play Monopoly, unlike some people we know.</p><p>“Park Avenue: Money, power and the American dream,” Alex Gibney for the “Why Poverty?” series</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/6niWzomA_So" frameborder="0" width="560" height="315"></iframe></p><p>“Some rich people are just dicks.”</p><p>So says one author interviewed in Alex Gibney’s opinionated, enlightening and anger-inducing documentary “Park Avenue: Money, Power and the American Dream,” part of the “Why Poverty?” series that recently won a Peabody Award.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/top_5_investigative_videos_of_the_week_some_rich_people_are_just_jerks_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/12/top_5_investigative_videos_of_the_week_some_rich_people_are_just_jerks_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was ending the draft a mistake?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/was_ending_the_draft_a_mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/was_ending_the_draft_a_mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Army]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Draft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Militarism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iraq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Gates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vietnam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without conscription war has become an abstraction, enabling a new "era of persistent conflict"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Few probably recall the name Dwight Elliott Stone. But even if his name has faded from the national memory, the man remains historically significant. That's because on June 30, 1973, the 24-year-old plumber's apprentice became the last American forced into the armed services before the military draft expired.</p><p>Though next month's 40-year anniversary of the end of conscription will likely be as forgotten as Stone, it shouldn't be. In operations across the globe, the all-volunteer military has been employed by policymakers to birth what Gen. George Casey recently called the "era of persistent conflict." Four decades later, we therefore have an obligation to ask: How much of the public's complicity in that epochal shift is a result of the end of the draft?</p><p>There is, of course, no definitive answer to such a complex question. However, a look back at some lost history shows that today's public acquiescence to militarism was exactly what the government wanted when it ended the draft.</p><p>That loaded term -- "militarism" -- was, in fact, a prominent part of the 1970 report by President Nixon's Commission on an All-Volunteer Force. In its findings, the panel worried about "a cycle of anti-militarism" in a nation then questioning America's increasingly martial posture.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/was_ending_the_draft_a_mistake/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/was_ending_the_draft_a_mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>148</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Please stop comparing things to Watergate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/please_stop_comparing_things_to_watergate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/please_stop_comparing_things_to_watergate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darrell Issa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Benghazigate to Pastagate, the Watergate comparisons have gotten out of hand and need to stop]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Benghazi is back in the news today with a House Oversight Committee hearing, and that means Watergate is too. Because 40 years later, anything and everything gets compared to Watergate for some reason. It has to stop.</p><p>Here's Tea Party Rep. Steve Stockman -- "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/21/steve_stockman_the_new_michele_bachmann/">the New Michele Bachmann</a>" -- today:</p><blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p>You could call <a href="https://twitter.com/search/%23Benghazi">#Benghazi</a> Obama's Watergate, except no one died.</p> <p>— Rep. Steve Stockman (@SteveWorks4You) <a href="https://twitter.com/SteveWorks4You/status/332175444306710529">May 8, 2013</a></p></blockquote><p>Mike Huckabee echoed the sentiment on Sunday, saying Benghazi <a href="http://nation.foxnews.com/benghazi/2013/05/08/huckabee-benghazi-will-be-obama-s-watergate">will be Obama's Watergate</a> or worse because, "as bad as Watergate was -- because it broke the trust between the president and the people -- no one died." But Huckabee and Stockman are just cribbing John McCain, who's been <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/18/nbcs-david-gregory-defend_n_863660.html">saying the same thing</a> since October. Naturally, Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly and the rest of the crew at Fox News are <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/2013/05/08/the-fox-news-campaign-to-tie-benghazi-to-waterg/193966">all over the comparison</a> as well</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/please_stop_comparing_things_to_watergate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/please_stop_comparing_things_to_watergate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Nixon, hero of the American Left</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/i_was_a_nixon_junkie_defending_the_20th_centurys_most_misunderstood_president_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/i_was_a_nixon_junkie_defending_the_20th_centurys_most_misunderstood_president_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 May 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essays]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13288160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He's justifiably reviled by historians, but Nixon's politics were far more progressive than we give him credit]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1_sm.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a></p><blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p> <p><em>Sometimes I have succeeded and sometimes I have failed, but always I have taken heart from what Theodore Roosevelt once said about the man in the arena, "whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes short again and again because there is not effort without error and shortcoming, but who does actually strive to do the deed, who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself in a worthy cause, who at the best knows in the end the triumphs of high achievements and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly."</em></p> <p><em></em>— Richard Nixon, August 8, 1974</p></blockquote><p>¤</p><p>ON APRIL 27, 1994, outside a small home in Yorba Linda, California, President William Jefferson Clinton delivered the final eulogy at the funeral of Richard Milhous Nixon. At first, the speech seemed to abide by the unspoken rules of decorum that had informed every eulogy before it: praise the former president in broad terms; highlight his triumphs in foreign policy. Pay homage to his enviable family life. Do not, under any circumstances, say “Watergate.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/i_was_a_nixon_junkie_defending_the_20th_centurys_most_misunderstood_president_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/i_was_a_nixon_junkie_defending_the_20th_centurys_most_misunderstood_president_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gallup: Higher approval for Presidents once they&#8217;re out of office</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gallup_higher_approval_for_presidents_once_theyre_out_of_office/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gallup_higher_approval_for_presidents_once_theyre_out_of_office/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2013 13:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13281640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except for Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to a Gallup analysis, ex-Presidents tend to get higher approval ratings once they leave office - including <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/bush_family_furiously_selling_itself_to_americans_once_again/">George W. Bush</a>, and with the exception of Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon.</p><p>From <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/162044/history-usually-kinder-presidents.aspx">Gallup</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Additionally, seven of nine former presidents have had higher retrospective approval ratings than their final job approval rating as president just before leaving office. That includes George W. Bush, who earned a 47% retrospective approval rating in the November 2010 poll, the only time Gallup has measured Bush retrospectively. That rating is 13 percentage points higher than Bush's 34% final job approval rating as president in January 2009, but similar to his overall job approval average of 49%.</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gallup_higher_approval_for_presidents_once_theyre_out_of_office/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/gallup_higher_approval_for_presidents_once_theyre_out_of_office/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Robert Reich: We&#8217;ve forgotten the lessons of Watergate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/robert_reich_weve_forgotten_the_lessons_of_watergate_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/robert_reich_weve_forgotten_the_lessons_of_watergate_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Mar 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Reich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Watergate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13243106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former secretary of labor says that increased transparency is now a thing of the past]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p><article id="post-26515">At the National Press Club, the citizen’s lobby Common Cause held a <a href="http://www.commoncause.org/site/pp.asp?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&amp;b=8601105">conference commemorating the 40th anniversary of Watergate</a>. Kicking off the conference was economist Robert Reich, former secretary of labor under President Clinton. In this audio exclusive at the event, Moyers and Company senior writer <a href="http://billmoyers.com/author/winshipm/">Michael Winship</a> talks with Reich about the ways in which Washington has changed since Watergate and how the influence of money continues to corrupt politics and exacerbates the crisis of income inequality in America.<iframe src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fapi.soundcloud.com%2Ftracks%2F83269285" frameborder="no" scrolling="no" width="100%" height="166"></iframe>At the conference, Reich said that despite the crisis, America’s response to Watergate was, in many respects, “a huge success … Watergate should be considered a moment when government showed its resilience.” In the wake of wrongdoing by the president and those closest to him, Reich argued, the rest of the government and the American people rose to the occasion in the way our democracy’s founders would have hoped. There was campaign finance reform, increased transparency and limits placed on presidential power but, he added, in recent years, much of what was accomplished post-Watergate has come undone.</article><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/robert_reich_weve_forgotten_the_lessons_of_watergate_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/16/robert_reich_weve_forgotten_the_lessons_of_watergate_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>America&#8217;s drug war of attrition</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/americas_drug_war_of_attrition_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/americas_drug_war_of_attrition_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GlobalPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The War on Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Volcker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mexico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colombia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cocaine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229685</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decades after Nixon fired the first salvo, most everyone agrees it's time for a truce. And still the battle rages]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.globalpost.com/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_globalPostInline.gif" alt="Global Post" /></a> BOSTON — The global drug war is arguably America’s longest armed conflict, declared 42 years ago and still raging at a pace that would startle many citizens.</p><p>It is waged daily, on farmland and streets from Colombia to Mexico to Detroit. It has put millions of people behind bars,  and has dramatically influenced our culture and worldview.</p><p>By some estimates, it has cost the nation more than $2 trillion dollars.</p><p>Ironically, the drug war was nearly stillborn.</p><p>Less than a year after he <a href="http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=-5IjAAAAIBAJ&amp;sjid=RLcFAAAAIBAJ&amp;pg=973,31915&amp;dq=nixon+war+on+drugs&amp;hl=en">fired the first salvos</a>, Nixon's Republican-led Shafer commission sought to <a href="http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive/pdf?res=FA0D1FFD3E5C1A7A93C5AB1788D85F478785F9">calm Americans</a> and temper the president’s claims.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/americas_drug_war_of_attrition_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/americas_drug_war_of_attrition_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who are Democrats and Republicans representing, anyway?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/who_are_democrats_and_republicans_representing_anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/who_are_democrats_and_republicans_representing_anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13222468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proof of republican democracy's decline: A new study shows that politicians overestimate their voters' conservatism]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are ideas widely supported in most of the country so often portrayed as controversial, polarizing and divisive once they are taken up by legislatures? Why does the professional political class seem like a wholly separate society that does not understand the constituents it is supposed to be representing? These are the existential questions at the root of America's political dysfunction - and a new study marshaling reams of data finally provides some concrete answers.</p><p>Conducted by the University of California's David Broockman and University of Michigan's Christopher Skovron, the survey of nearly 2,000 legislators from across America documents politicians’ perceptions of their constituents' views on hot-button issues like universal health care and same-sex marriage. It then compares those perceptions with constituents' actual views.</p><p>The juxtaposition reveals a jarring truth: Both Republican and Democratic lawmakers hugely overestimate the conservatism of the very people they are supposed to represent. In all, the report finds that "conservative politicians systematically believe their constituents are more conservative than they actually are by over 20 percentage points, while liberal politicians also typically overestimate their constituents’ conservatism by several percentage points." Ultimately, that has resulted in a political system inherently hostile to mainstream proposals and utterly unrepresentative of public opinion.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/who_are_democrats_and_republicans_representing_anyway/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/who_are_democrats_and_republicans_representing_anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The secret story of Richard Nixon&#8217;s first scandal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/19/the_secret_story_of_richard_nixons_first_scandal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/19/the_secret_story_of_richard_nixons_first_scandal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Checkers speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dwight Eisenhower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13165933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Long before Watergate, a secret fund almost ended his career -- instead, the Checkers speech taught him everything]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>Richard Nixon’s Checkers speech — delivered just five days after the New York Post reported wealthy backers had set up a fund for his day-to-day expenses — was seen by some 58 million people, or about a third of the population of the United States. It lasted thirty minutes and was to be forever identified by its reference to a cocker spaniel named Checkers. It was like nothing ever seen in American politics, set apart by its intimacy, its pathos, the apparent revelation of a private life from a public man, and its use of television. Its structure was a trial lawyer’s closing (or, perhaps, opening) argument, which ranged from the explanatory to the exculpatory to the defiant; buried within it was not only Nixon’s defense of himself, but occasional jabs at his opponents and probably at General Dwight Eisenhower, his running mate. It is still a remarkable document.</p> <p>The set was simple: Nixon sat behind a desk, his hands loosely clasped over his notes, and Pat Nixon was several feet away in a chair that seemed too large for her. Looking earnestly into the camera, Nixon said:</p> <blockquote><p>My fellow Americans, I come before you tonight as a candidate for the Vice Presidency and as a man whose honesty and integrity have been questioned. Now, the usual political thing to do when charges are made against you is either to ignore them or deny them without giving details.</p></blockquote> <blockquote><p>I believe we’ve had enough of that in the United States, particularly with the present Administration ...</p> <p>I have a theory, too, that the best and only answer to a smear or to an honest misunderstanding of the facts is to tell the truth. And that’s why I’m here tonight. I want to tell you my side of the case.</p></blockquote> <p>Nixon went on to do just that, often conducting a dialogue with himself in a style and rhythm that he would continue to employ and to improve upon throughout his public life:</p> <blockquote><p>I’m sure that you have read the charge and you’ve heard it said that I, Senator Nixon, took $18,000 from a group of my supporters.</p> <p>Now, was that wrong? And let me say that ... it isn’t a question of whether it was legal or illegal; that isn’t enough. The question is: Was it <em>morally </em>wrong? I say it was morally wrong if any of that $18,000 went to Senator Nixon, for my personal use. I say that it was morally wrong if it was secretly given and secretly handled. And I say it was morally wrong if any of the contributors got special favors for the contributions they made.</p></blockquote> <p>But that never happened, Nixon insisted. And then he posed another question to himself: “Well, then, some of you will say, and rightly, ‘Well, what did you use the fund <em>for, </em>Senator?’ ‘Why did you have to have it?’” That permitted him to explain the economics of a Senate office — his salary, his travel expenses, and the rest. But there were, he added, other expenses that needed to be covered for which there was no federal reimbursement. How, Nixon asked, does one pay for that — and do it legally? “The first way,” he said, “is to be a rich man. I don’t happen to be a rich man; so I couldn’t use that one.” Then, using the language of quiet insinuation that infuriated his detractors, he took the night’s first slap at the Democrats — starting with Senator Sparkman — while bringing Pat Nixon into an increasingly personal narrative:</p> <blockquote><p>Another way that is used is to put your wife on the payroll. Let me say, incidentally, that my opponent, my opposite number for the Vice Presidency on the Democratic ticket, does have his wife on the payroll, and has had her on his payroll for ten years — for the past ten years.</p></blockquote> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/19/the_secret_story_of_richard_nixons_first_scandal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/19/the_secret_story_of_richard_nixons_first_scandal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sorry, America, there is no such thing as &#8220;October Surprises&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/sorry_america_there_is_no_such_thing_as_october_surprises/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/sorry_america_there_is_no_such_thing_as_october_surprises/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloria Allred]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October surprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Donald Trump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Drudge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13051177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trump's bombshell fizzled, but it's only partly his fault. There are no big reveals two weeks before an election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney campaign surrogate Donald Trump was making some noise recently about some sort of "announcement" he planned to make that would somehow hurt President Barack Obama's reelection efforts. Today, it turned out to be <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/10/24/donald-trump-announcement_n_2009914.html">some nonsense</a> related to Trump's pet theory that Obama was secretly not a very good student in college.</p><p>Meanwhile, celebrity attorney Gloria Allred promised some juicy revelations that would damage the presidential campaign of former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney. It is apparently some old testimony from Romney in his friend's divorce trial. <a href="http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2012/10/mitt-romney-october-surprise-revealed-gloria-allred">What will it reveal?</a> Probably nothing that will cause Romney to lose.</p><p>We're in fake-out October Surprise season, and for all their feigned world-weariness, political reporters love it. It would be so magical if some unforeseen event suddenly "shook up" an election in its closing weeks, or else everyone is basically stuck writing the same boring stories about "turnout operations" and "ground games" until Tuesday night.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/sorry_america_there_is_no_such_thing_as_october_surprises/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/sorry_america_there_is_no_such_thing_as_october_surprises/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ignore McGovern&#8217;s message at your peril</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/ignore_mcgoverns_message_at_your_peril/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/ignore_mcgoverns_message_at_your_peril/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Kissinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George McGovern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13048372</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times  downplays his impact, but we're desperate for McGovern-like critics of reckless foreign policy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George McGovern lived his public life with an integrity that in these rancid political times, all of us might envy. He unfortunately is remembered most for his overwhelming defeat at the hands of Richard Nixon in the presidential election of 1972, but it is worth noting that Nixon resigned in disgrace, the only president to ever abandon his office. McGovern was a historian, undoubtedly with profound respect for the presidency; it is difficult to imagine his obstructing justice or abusing his power in the Nixon manner.</p><p>As we count the dwindling numbers of World War II veterans, we recall McGovern’s heroic service in that conflict. He piloted the lumbering B-24, the slowest of our combat bombers, through 35 hazardous missions over numerous targets in Nazi-occupied southern Europe. He received the Distinguished Flying Cross for one mission in which his navigator was killed, yet he safely landed his crippled plane on a small Adriatic island.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/ignore_mcgoverns_message_at_your_peril/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/ignore_mcgoverns_message_at_your_peril/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>McGovern candidacy a cultural landmark</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/mcgovern_candidacy_a_cultural_landmark/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/mcgovern_candidacy_a_cultural_landmark/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Lennon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George McGovern]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/mcgovern_candidacy_a_cultural_landmark/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iconic rock stars and activists in the 70s were strong supporters of McGovern]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — Abbie Hoffman sobbed that fateful night at the downtown Manhattan apartment of fellow activist Jerry Rubin. So did Rubin and Allen Ginsberg. John Lennon was drunk, and out of control, shouting "Up the Revolution!" in mock celebration of a dream defeated.</p><p>It was November 1972 and George McGovern had just been whipped in a landslide by Richard Nixon.</p><p>McGovern, who died Sunday at age 90, was the earnest son of a minister, raised on a South Dakota farm. He wasn't a longhair and he wasn't charismatic, not a man you'd expect to win the loyalty of rock stars or win the heart of Hoffman, the Yippie prankster who just four years earlier had suggested a pig should run for president and said what America needed was nonstop sex in the streets.</p><p>But the candidate's steady liberal principles, and the timing of his run, made McGovern the first presidential nominee of a major political party to attract a broad and public following from the rebels who had come of age the decade before.</p><p>"He was the first candidate I voted for," says the activist and historian Todd Gitlin, who was in his late 20s at the time. "I think the support he got was a sign that the era of radical obstinacy was over."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/mcgovern_candidacy_a_cultural_landmark/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/mcgovern_candidacy_a_cultural_landmark/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>George McGovern dies at age 90</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/george_mcgovern_dies_aged_90/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/george_mcgovern_dies_aged_90/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2012 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obituaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George McGovern]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1972 election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13047454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He was a life-long liberal who tried to unseat Nixon, "the most corrupt president in history"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (AP) -- George McGovern once joked that he had wanted to run for president in the worst way - and that he had done so.</p><p>It was a campaign in 1972 dishonored by Watergate, a scandal that fully unfurled too late to knock Republican President Richard M. Nixon from his place as a commanding favorite for re-election. The South Dakota senator tried to make an issue out of the bungled attempt to wiretap the offices of the Democratic National Committee, calling Nixon the most corrupt president in history.</p><p>A proud liberal who had argued fervently against Vietnam War as a Democratic senator from South Dakota and three-time candidate for president, McGovern died at 5:15 a.m. local time Sunday at a Sioux Falls hospice, surrounded by family and lifelong friends, family spokesman Steve Hildebrand told The Associated Press. McGovern was 90.</p><p>The family had said late last week that McGovern had become unresponsive while in hospice care.</p><p>"We are blessed to know that our father lived a long, successful and productive life advocating for the hungry, being a progressive voice for millions and fighting for peace. He continued giving speeches, writing and advising all the way up to and past his 90th birthday, which he celebrated this summer," the family said in the statement.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/george_mcgovern_dies_aged_90/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/21/george_mcgovern_dies_aged_90/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whittaker Chambers relative: Farm need not be open to public</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/whittaker_chambers_relative_farm_need_not_be_open_to_public/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/whittaker_chambers_relative_farm_need_not_be_open_to_public/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Wiener]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whittaker Chambers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alger Hiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cold War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Chambers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13044346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chambers' grandson suggests the author of a new book never visited the family farm; the historian confirms he did ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Jon Wiener needs to set some facts straight, at least in the excerpt from his new book, just published by Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/wiener_excerpt/">("A visit to the right’s least popular museum").</a></p><p>First, the Whittaker Chambers Farm is no museum. In fact is neither a requirement nor even an implication that a property designated as a National Historic Landmark need open to the public at all. In <a href="http://www.nps.gov/nhl/themes/ColdWar.pdf">"Protecting America: Cold War Defensive Sites (A National Historical Landmark Theme Study),"</a> dated October 2011, the NPS clearly holds the Whittaker Chambers Farm "private property, not open to the public." Further, Whittaker Chambers (my grandfather) never claimed his farm meant much to the outside world. He described it as "a few hundred acres of dirt, some clusters of old barns and outbuildings… a few beeves and hogs or a flock of sheep." ("Witness," p. 517). It hasn't changed much over the years.</p><p>Second, Dr. Wiener either visited under cover, through a third person — or not at all. He claims that he saw only horses "where the landmark was supposed to be." He must have come to the wrong place: we have never owned or housed horses. According to John Chambers (my father), who lives and works on the Farm, Dr. Wiener never called on him.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/whittaker_chambers_relative_farm_need_not_be_open_to_public/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/18/whittaker_chambers_relative_farm_need_not_be_open_to_public/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A visit to the right&#8217;s least popular museum</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/wiener_excerpt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/wiener_excerpt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Nixon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alger Hiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whittaker Chambers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13038415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP insisted Whittaker Chambers' pumpkin patch become a historical site. It averages two guests a year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most popular National Park Service site is the Blue Ridge Parkway in Virginia, which has around 17 million visitors per year; the least popular seems to be the Whittaker Chambers pumpkin patch National Historic Landmark near Baltimore, which has around two visitors per year. I was one of them. One windy fall day, I set out from Baltimore with friends to search for the pumpkin patch. The Reagan administration designated it a National Historic Landmark (officially called “Whittaker Chambers Farm”) in 1988 over the unanimous objection of the National Park Service Advisory Board. The site, outside Westminster, Md., commemorates the spot where, in 1947, Whittaker Chambers reached into a hollowed-out pumpkin and pulled out some 35mm film. He said it showed that Alger Hiss, a pillar of the New Deal, had been a Soviet spy.</p><p>The “pumpkin papers” helped convict Hiss of perjury in 1950, which transformed public opinion, convincing Americans for the first time that communism posed a real danger to the country. The obscure congressman named Nixon who pushed the Hiss case won a Senate seat the year Hiss was convicted and got the vice-presidential nomination in 1952; a month after Hiss’s conviction, Sen. Joseph McCarthy gave the speech in Wheeling, W.Va., that launched his career and gave the new, virulent anticommunism its name. For the next 45 years, the Cold War served as the iron cage of American politics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/wiener_excerpt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/13/wiener_excerpt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
