<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Rick Perry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/rick_perry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Romney rivals all become socialists, to horror of conservatives</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/romney_rivals_all_become_socialists_to_horror_of_conservatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/romney_rivals_all_become_socialists_to_horror_of_conservatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 18:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12033391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GOP candidates trash capitalism, and good on them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitt Romney accidentally said he likes firing people the other day, sort of. <a href="http://prospect.org/article/no-mitt-romney-did-not-reveal-his-true-essence">A fair reading of his statement, in context,</a> is much less damning. He was talking about insurance companies, and he was saying he likes the idea that a consumer can "fire" someone providing them a service and choose someone else to provide that service, which is well and good.</p><p>(I happen to think the "fire people" gaffe <em>did</em> reveal something essential about Romney's character: Not that he's a heartless capitalist robber baron, but that the man is incapable of speaking off-the-cuff without <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=l3cvAjIdEy0">saying something bizarre</a> and tone-deaf. "I like being able to fire people who provide services to me" is just a really weird phrase, and an odd way of expressing a perfectly reasonable sentiment.)</p><p>Of course, his rivals for the Republican nomination wisely ignored the greater context and promptly turned <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/01/perry-campaign-makes-romney-fire-people-ringtone/">"I like being able to fire people" into a ringtone.</a> Which they are supposed to do, because they're running for president against this guy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/romney_rivals_all_become_socialists_to_horror_of_conservatives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/10/romney_rivals_all_become_socialists_to_horror_of_conservatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s GOP makes Mississippi look liberal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/29/todays_gop_females_have_more_rights_before_theyre_born/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/29/todays_gop_females_have_more_rights_before_theyre_born/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=11326401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most 2012 contenders back a personhood amendment too extreme for a red, red state, while Rick Perry hits a new low]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The flailing Rick Perry is trying to revive his sinking campaign by histrionically announcing he's changed his views on abortion and now opposes it even in cases of rape and incest. Apparently Perry met a young woman who'd been conceived as a result of rape, and that changed his mind.</p><p>“Looking in her eyes, I couldn’t come up with an answer to defend the exemptions for rape and incest,” he said at a "tele-town hall" sponsored by far-right Iowa radio host Steve Deace. "And over the course of the last few weeks, the Christmas holidays and reflecting on that … all I can say is that God was working on my heart."</p><p>It's just one more step toward society's political margins for the GOP contenders. Perry has already announced his support for the "personhood" movement, which declares that life begins the moment an egg is fertilized, a measure that was rejected by the deep-red state of Mississippi as too extreme. But Michele Bachmann, Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum also back the personhood crusade. That's your modern Republican Party: It makes Mississippi look liberal. They'd like women to have more rights before they're born than after.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/29/todays_gop_females_have_more_rights_before_theyre_born/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/29/todays_gop_females_have_more_rights_before_theyre_born/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>121</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Rick Perry is just like my dad&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/rick_perry_is_just_like_my_dad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/rick_perry_is_just_like_my_dad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RedState]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10749381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A conservative endorsement]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ten contributors to the conservative blog RedState have collaborated on a post endorsing Rick Perry for the presidency. Yes, that Rick Perry. The one who hasn't led a national poll of Republicans since late September. The one who only makes headlines when he says something amusingly stupid. "Don't settle," their headline urges. Don't settle for someone who doesn't routinely humiliate himself every single time he attempts to speak extemporaneously.</p><p>The post lays out Perry's oft-told history of being a true conservative tax-cuttin' god-fearin' job-creator, says every other candidate is vulnerable and insists that Perry can win. But what about the fact that the guy appears to be the dumbest person in the room every time he's in front of a camera? Oh, that's a minor problem, really.</p><blockquote><p>The one knock on Perry is that his poor debate performances and periodic campaign trail gaffes will open him to the same vulnerabilities in office as President Bush: an inability to respond to criticism or explain his own policies.</p></blockquote><p>Perry's poor communication skills are easily overcome:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/rick_perry_is_just_like_my_dad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/21/rick_perry_is_just_like_my_dad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Perry: More disliked than Rebecca Black</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/09/rick_perry_more_disliked_than_rebecca_black/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/09/rick_perry_more_disliked_than_rebecca_black/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10305661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As his ad goes viral -- and divides his campaign -- the Texas governor proves again to be a world-class punch line]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which FTD Thank You bouquet do you think John Pike sent Rick Perry this week? Did he go for the "Sweet Splendor" or the "Because You're Special"? Maybe he opted for the Hickory Farms sausage and cheese box? He must have done something grand, because who else but Rick Perry could have provided the Internet with the most funny-horrible thing since <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/the_geeky_triumph_of_pepper_spray_cop/">Pepper Spray Cop</a>?</p><p>You've seen the "Strong" video by now. Your friends have posted it all over Facebook, usually with a string of LOLs underneath. In a campaign ad that, unfortunately for Perry, strongly evokes both Heath Ledger's tormented performance and his sartorial leanings in "Brokeback Mountain," the man who uproariously still believes he has a shot at the White House says, "I'm not ashamed to admit that I'm a Christian, but you don't need to be in the pew every Sunday to know there's something wrong in this country when gays can serve openly in the military but our kids can't openly celebrate Christmas or pray in school." He goes on to promise, "As president, I'll end Obama's war on religion. And I'll fight against liberal attacks on our religious heritage." (Perry staffers are already <a href="http://mobile.nationaljournal.com/2012-presidential-campaign/rick-perry-s-strong-ad-stirs-opposition-from-perry-pollster-gay-rights-supporters-video-20111208">distancing themselves</a> from responsibility, with his top pollster calling the ad "nuts.")</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/12/09/rick_perry_more_disliked_than_rebecca_black/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/12/09/rick_perry_more_disliked_than_rebecca_black/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>149</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate advice for Rick Perry – slam Newt!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/debate_advice_for_rick_perry_%e2%80%93_slam_newt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/debate_advice_for_rick_perry_%e2%80%93_slam_newt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10246820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas governor needs a win, and he can get it by tying Gingrich to Mitt Romney. They're flip and flop]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is Texas Gov. Rick Perry's moment. The GOP primary campaign has always been an effort to winnow the many candidates down to two: Mitt Romney and Not Mitt Romney. It's got to be killing Perry (assuming he feels any pain at all) to watch Gingrich emerge as the latest Not Mitt.</p><p>Gingrich is still surging in the polls – the latest to find him in first place is CNN – and while I think his history of selling himself to corporate America will ultimately turn off Tea Partyers, what do I know about Tea Partyers, anyway? I try to give them credit for ideological consistency – they supposedly hate crony capitalism, and Newt is its poster boy – but I may be politically naive in that.</p><p>That's where Rick Perry comes in. The guy's got enough money to be the Not Mitt. He's never lost an election. Surely he's got to have more substance than it's seemed so far – he can't really be a stoner frat boy let loose in a presidential race. Can he? I think he can redeem a series of horrible debate performances with a good pummeling of Gingrich Tuesday night.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/debate_advice_for_rick_perry_%e2%80%93_slam_newt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/22/debate_advice_for_rick_perry_%e2%80%93_slam_newt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shrum: Mitt Romney winning because he looks pretty grown-up</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10197737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Perry should've read Chris Matthews' new book, says a veteran of countless losing campaigns]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Mitt Romney is the only adult in the room," <a href="http://theweek.com/bullpen/column/221341/mitt-romney-is-the-only-adult-in-the-room/1">according to Democratic campaign consultant Bob Shrum</a>, who dutifully typed out a thousand words of campaign analysis for The Week. It is obvious but basically true, though if "the room" contains Jon Huntsman and Gary Johnson, it might be more accurate to refer to Mitt as "the only adult in the room willing to tell the kids that Santa is real even if he himself clearly doesn't believe it." ("The kids" are Republican voters and "Santa is real" is modern conservative dogma.) (Just go with me here.)</p><p>This is defining adult down. Mitt Romney is tall and has nice hair. He looks like a dad in a Cialis commercial. He's on a stage with smug adulterer Newt Gingrich, serial sexual harassment clown Herman Cain, crazy-eyed witch-burner Michele Bachmann, and out-of-date George W. Bush impression Rick Perry. So, sure, Romney, why not?</p><p>What went wrong for Perry, though? I mean besides the fact that he is pretty obviously both dimwitted and lazy. According to Shrum, who quotes the book at length, what went wrong for Perry is that he did not prepare for the debate by reading Chris Matthews' "lyrical new book 'Jack Kennedy: Elusive Hero,'" which Shrum quotes at length.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/11/shrum_mitt_romney_winning_because_he_looks_pretty_grown_up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Review contributor declares Taylor Swift winner of GOP debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/national_review_contributor_declares_taylor_swift_winner_of_gop_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/national_review_contributor_declares_taylor_swift_winner_of_gop_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2011 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Jean Lopez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taylor Swift]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10191732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being governor and running for president at the same time must be hard, and other insights from K-Lo]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let's check in with National Review's Kathryn Jean Lopez, shall we? Lopez, the world's greatest political blogger, has made two very compelling points about last night's Republican debate. The first, <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/282817/re-perrys-moment-kathryn-jean-lopez">made shortly after it ended:</a></p><blockquote><p>In all seriousness, it cannot be easy to be governor of Texas and run for president at the same time.</p></blockquote><p>That is the entirety of the post. (<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/282817/re-perrys-moment-kathryn-jean-lopez#comment-371873">Commenter "motherofthetroops"</a>: "K-Lo, I say this in Christian love: what Perry is to debaters, you are to Corner commentators." People who preface things with "I say this in Christian love" are people who are about to say something awful to you, usually.)</p><p>This morning, <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/282837/cnbc-debate-night-kathryn-jean-lopez">she published a longer reaction to last night's debate</a>, informed by a night of careful consideration. "These candidates aren’t half bad," she declares. "I do wish Santorum would have his moment," she sighs, wistfully, imagining herself chastely holding hands with the former senator on a lovely spring day as they block the entrance of a Planned Parenthood clinic.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/national_review_contributor_declares_taylor_swift_winner_of_gop_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/10/national_review_contributor_declares_taylor_swift_winner_of_gop_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The disturbing truths about Rick Perry&#8217;s Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/the_disturbing_truths_about_rick_perrys_texas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/the_disturbing_truths_about_rick_perrys_texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10161581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Local reports reveal how the governor turned a blind eye to civil rights violations and a crumbling infrastructure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m at sea this week – literally, for once -- and learning helpful nautical stuff. For example, the old, three-mile limit for territorial waters was established in 1702 as the maximum distance a cannonball could reach when fired from the shore.</p><p>It’s even more useful to gain some distance from political events back on the mainland. Much of the week before this was spent chairing an international meeting of writers from a dozen or so countries. Combined, seeing ourselves as others see us, both experiences are revelatory.</p><p>One theme that prevails is a general mystification over many Americans’ propensity for the outright rejection of anything that’s not instantly comprehended. Just yesterday, talking with a couple from Calgary, the Canadians expressed their incredulity that relatives in the States were so vehemently opposed to President Obama’s healthcare and jobs programs “when they haven’t even bothered to read anything about them.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/the_disturbing_truths_about_rick_perrys_texas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/04/the_disturbing_truths_about_rick_perrys_texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP elite delaying inevitable Romney acceptance</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/gop_elite_delaying_inevitable_romney_acceptance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/gop_elite_delaying_inevitable_romney_acceptance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10161298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Party insiders will almost certainly settle on the flip-flopping ex-governor, but they're taking their time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonathan Bernstein <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/fresh-signs-that-mitt-romney-may-win-gop-nomination/2011/03/28/gIQA8mBJgM_blog.html">writes today</a> that Mitt Romney is still looking like a good bet to win the GOP nomination, based on Mark Blumenthal's "Political Outsiders" survey (which, contrary to its name, actually polls political insiders in early primary states).</p><p><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/02/mitt-romney-frontrunner-undecided-gop-power-outsiders_n_1070255.html?1320235599&amp;ncid=edlinkusaolp00000008">The survey says</a> Romney is tied with Perry for public endorsements from "influential Republicans," and he's barely beating Herman Cain and Newt Gingrich (!) in the "potential support" race, but as Bernstein says, the point is that Romney has a much better shot of winning elite support <em>in the future</em> than any other candidate.</p><blockquote><p>But the key for Romney isn’t having support now; it’s whether or not he’s ultimately acceptable to most party groups and leaders. And here, the news is very, very good for the former Massachusetts governor. Of the entire group, while 23% have already endorsed another candidate, only another 10% say they have “no chance” of supporting him for the nomination.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/gop_elite_delaying_inevitable_romney_acceptance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/03/gop_elite_delaying_inevitable_romney_acceptance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Perry: Elect me because I am incapable of communicating clearly</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/rick_perry_elect_me_because_i_am_incapable_of_communicating_clearly/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/rick_perry_elect_me_because_i_am_incapable_of_communicating_clearly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10160294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the Texas governor making a play for Cain supporters by highlighting a weird speech? Or was he just drunk? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last weekend, Rick Perry gave a bizarre, rambling speech in New Hampshire that quickly became an "Internet sensation." It is sort of like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BhDhDRvHaGs&amp;feature=related">BadLipReading</a> come to life.</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/7M4gz97Y9W8" frameborder="0" width="450" height="335"></iframe></p><p>"This is such a cool state," Perry says, referring to New Hampshire, not "intoxication."</p><p>How to explain this? Perry isn't a great public speaker, but he's usually not a slurring, incoherent one. At a National Journal panel, <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/11/booze-or-back-meds-explaining-perrys-odd-speech/247690/">Democratic consultant Steve McMahon thought perhaps Perry was drunk.</a> He sounds a bit drunk. But who gets drunk before giving a speech in New Hampshire? This isn't the Golden Globes, this is a presidential campaign.</p><p>Republican Charlie Black suggests a different substance:</p><blockquote><p>"It's odd," Black said of the speech. "I haven't asked anybody in Governor Perry's campaign about it. Look, he's got a back problem, maybe it was back medicine ... ."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/rick_perry_elect_me_because_i_am_incapable_of_communicating_clearly/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/rick_perry_elect_me_because_i_am_incapable_of_communicating_clearly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Stewart: Mitt Romney is the luckiest man alive</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/jon_stewart_mitt_romney_is_the_luckiest_man_alive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/jon_stewart_mitt_romney_is_the_luckiest_man_alive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10160122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Herman Cain and Rick Perry stumble over the weekend, handing a political gift to the former Massachusetts governor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's been an interesting few days to cover the race to the Republican nomination. Despite of a string of gaffes over the past couple of weeks, Herman Cain was still narrowly leading Mitt Romney in most polls. Then, as Jon Stewart pointed out on <a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-october-31-2011/indecision-2012---ruh-roh-edition?xrs=share_copy">"The Daily Show"</a> last night, came trouble, with Politico's <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/67194.html">anonymously sourced story</a> stating that Cain was accused of sexually harassing two women more than a decade ago. Meanwhile, Rick Perry gave a speech in New Hampshire  that made it seem like he'd either broken into the liquor cabinet or been given a large dose of anesthetic.</p><p>A confluence of flubs this severe led Stewart to one compelling conclusion: "Mitt Romney is the luckiest mother-fudger on earth."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/jon_stewart_mitt_romney_is_the_luckiest_man_alive/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/01/jon_stewart_mitt_romney_is_the_luckiest_man_alive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Perry does not support Confederate license plates</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/rick_perry_does_not_support_confederate_licence_plates/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/rick_perry_does_not_support_confederate_licence_plates/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confederate flag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10149840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas governor, disappointing the Sons of the Confederacy, says he doesn't want to "reopen old wounds"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas governor and <a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/26/teenagers_for_rick_perry/">teenage heartthrob</a> Rick Perry has a history of <a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/07/13/rick_perry_sons_of_confederate_veterans/">politically expedient affection for the Confederate States of America</a>, but he has apparently now decided that public displays of the Confederate battle flag should probably not be endorsed and promoted by the government of the Civil War-winning United States.</p><p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/perry-against-texas-confederate-license-plates-despite-past-defense-of-confederate-symbols/2011/10/26/gIQAq48bJM_story.html">According to the AP</a>, Perry said he doesn't support a campaign (<a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/25/rick_perrys_chance_for_leadership/singleton/">mentioned by Joan Walsh earlier this week</a>) by the Sons of Confederate Veterans to introduce specialty license plates featuring an unambiguously hateful symbol of white supremacy.</p><blockquote><p>The Republican presidential hopeful was in Florida for a fundraiser and told Bay News 9’s “Political Connections” and the St. Petersburg Times that, “we don’t need to be opening old wounds.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/rick_perry_does_not_support_confederate_licence_plates/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/rick_perry_does_not_support_confederate_licence_plates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Teenagers for Rick Perry!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/teenagers_for_rick_perry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/teenagers_for_rick_perry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 18:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10147455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The school-aged children of Rick Perry donors and appointees donate thousands to his presidential campaign]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Huffington Post, obviously trying to smear American hero Rick Perry, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/25/perry-2012-donations-children_n_1030771.html">tries to insinuate that there's something untoward</a> about the fact that his campaign keeps recording huge donations from the live-at-home children of his rich donors.</p><p>There are still these federal laws limiting how much individuals can donate to political campaigns (which is why God and the Supreme Court invented 501(c)(4)s), and while minors aren't forbidden from sending their hard-earned allowances to candidates who promise to fill school libraries with R-rated movies, the minors themselves are supposed to <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/25/perry-2012-donations-children_n_1030771.html">be the ones donating:</a></p><blockquote><p>Under current law, three conditions that must be met for a minor to donate to a political campaign: that the donation was made knowingly and voluntarily; that the funds donated must belong to the minor in question; and that the parents may not reimburse the child for the donation. A Perry spokesman declined to say whether there is an age that the campaign considers too young to knowingly and voluntarily donate.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/teenagers_for_rick_perry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/26/teenagers_for_rick_perry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Perry&#8217;s chance for leadership</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/25/rick_perrys_chance_for_leadership/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/25/rick_perrys_chance_for_leadership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confederate flag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10144808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So far he's stayed neutral about putting the Confederate flag on Texas license plates. He should oppose it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Rick Perry really wants to show the nation he's renounced the politics that made it OK to name property "Niggerhead," he's got a great opportunity. In November, the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles board will vote on a proposal by the Sons of Confederate Veterans to let voters put a Confederate flag on their license plates. When the board last voted, it deadlocked at 4-4, with one commissioner missing. One member who supported the plan has since died, and Perry appointed his successor. Next month the question will come before the full board again. It's a chance for Perry to show some courage and make clear he's not courting the neo-Confederate vote.</p><p>But so far, the Texas governor seems to come out of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/16/haley_barbour_forrest/">the Haley Barbour school of leadership</a>. Earlier this year, when the Sons of Confederate Veterans wanted Mississippi to issue a license plate commemorating Confederate hero and KKK founder Nathan Bedford Forrest, the governor refused to come out against the proposal, even after the NAACP asked him to. "I don’t go around denouncing people," Barbour told reporters, although he was asked to denounce the proposal, not people. "That’s not going to happen. I don’t even denounce the news media." At the time, the Mississippi governor was openly mulling his own presidential run, on an apparent campaign platform of Jim Crow racism being not "that bad," in his memory, at least. Barbour announced he wasn't running in April, after that trial balloon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/26/hayley_barbour/">turned out to be made of lead</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/25/rick_perrys_chance_for_leadership/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/25/rick_perrys_chance_for_leadership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How low will Rick Perry go?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/24/how_low_will_rick_perry_go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/24/how_low_will_rick_perry_go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 21:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10142614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sinking to new depths, he brings on Bush "brawn" Joe Allbaugh, who backed Giuliani in '08. Is Perry the next Rudy?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Perry's craven embrace of birtherism in Parade Magazine shouldn't surprise anyone. Much like Mitt Romney, he'll say whatever he thinks he needs to in order to win election. But he's not as smart as Romney, and he's got no chance in a general election unless he climbs from his new depths in the Republican primary pack. So the man who's been known to flatter secessionists made a play for the birther vote this weekend, along with the support of the movement's leader, Donald Trump.</p><p><a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/24/now_rick_perry_is_flirting_with_birtherism/">Steve Kornacki wrote</a> about Perry's ludicrous descent into birtherism here; I don't want it to be distractive, or a distractication, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/post/rick-perrys-distractive-birther-talk/2011/03/04/gIQAK2EEDM_blog.html">as Jonathan Capehart put it.</a>  I'm just starting to wonder how low Perry can go, and not only in terms of political bottom-feeding. How low is he willing to go in terms of poll numbers? Is there any point at which declining poll numbers, debate disasters and not ready for prime-time moments like the Parade interview will convince Perry he's hurting himself on the national stage, and it's time to head back to the ranch?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/24/how_low_will_rick_perry_go/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/24/how_low_will_rick_perry_go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Perry&#8217;s descent into birtherism</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/24/now_rick_perry_is_flirting_with_birtherism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/24/now_rick_perry_is_flirting_with_birtherism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10139794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What his disastrous interview with Parade tells us: He's bad -- really, really bad -- at running for president]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are some interview venues that have obvious potential to force a presidential candidate into some kind of a revealing slip-up. "Meet the Press" comes to mind here. Parade, the devoutly Middle American magazine that comes free with more than 500 Sunday newspapers, doesn't.</p><p>And yet, Rick Perry managed to make a real mess of <a href="http://www.parade.com/news/2011/10/23-rick-perry-hates-to-lose.html?index=1">a lengthy Q&amp;A</a> that ran in the magazine this weekend, telling interviewer Lynn Sherr (a former ABC journalist) that he doesn't have a "definitive answer" about whether Barack Obama was born in the United States and suggesting that the <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/27/president-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate">long-form birth certificate</a> the president released in the spring might not be authentic. Here's the relevant portion:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/24/now_rick_perry_is_flirting_with_birtherism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/24/now_rick_perry_is_flirting_with_birtherism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>94</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nevada to cave, move caucuses to early February</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/21/nevada_to_cave_move_caucuses_to_early_february/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/21/nevada_to_cave_move_caucuses_to_early_february/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herman Cain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10133478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP primary calendar is almost finally set, and Mitt Romney is probably thrilled]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Saturday, Nevada Republicans are likely to give in to national party pressure and move their 2012 caucuses from January to February. In the end, all it took was threatening to take away some invites to a party. <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2011/10/why-is-nevada-giving-up-its-early-primary/247122/">The Atlantic's Molly Ball explains:</a></p><blockquote><p>The reason: Party activists would rather get a chance to go to next year's national convention than deal with the current barrage of flak they're getting.</p>
<p>"Most of the [committee members] I've talked to feel it makes sense to go back to February," probably Feb. 4, said Robert List, the state's national committeeman and a former governor. "A lot of them want to be delegates to the national convention, and that's more likely if we don't get delegates taken away" as a penalty for breaking RNC rules. "And we all want to have the candidates coming back and campaigning."</p></blockquote><p>There are also rumors of "financial and other enticements" offered by the national GOP to the local poobahs, though the RNC denies it.</p><p>If Nevada moves, here's how next year looks, <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-primaries/188961-looming-showdown-over-nevada-caucus-pits-state-national-gop">according to The Hill:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/21/nevada_to_cave_move_caucuses_to_early_february/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/21/nevada_to_cave_move_caucuses_to_early_february/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anita Perry: We know pain of unemployed because our banker son quit his job</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/anita_perry_we_know_pain_of_unemployed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/anita_perry_we_know_pain_of_unemployed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anita Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10114712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fading candidate's wife makes two questionable campaign-trail statements in two days]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anita Perry, Rick Perry's wife, is, <a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/10/02/anita_perry_closet_liberal/singleton/">it seems</a>, a positive influence on the right-wing Texas governor. Her guidance is seen in his support <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0811/The_HPV_files_In_emails_Perry_mostly_absent.html">for HPV vaccines</a> and fundraising for victims of domestic violence. But she's also, it turns out, awful at speaking off-the-cuff in the middle of a high-stakes presidential campaign.</p><p>Being a candidate's spouse is really a horrible gig. Most candidates' spouses are non-politicians forced suddenly to act like politicians. Dumb things will be said. But the grandiose victimology on display in Anita Perry's talk before a South Carolina college yesterday is still pretty egregious. <a href="http://2012.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/10/anita-perry-has-been-brutalized.php">You may have seen it:</a></p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/NA7uvGSATFQ" frameborder="0" width="450" height="335"></iframe></p><p>TPM:</p><blockquote><p>“We’ve been brutalized and eaten up and chewed up in the press,” she said.</p>
<p>“It is a comfort to know that I am in this place where I can feel the presence of God. We are being brutalized by our opponents, and our own party,” she said. “So much of that is, I think they look at him because of his faith.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/anita_perry_we_know_pain_of_unemployed/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/14/anita_perry_we_know_pain_of_unemployed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Herman Cain, now tied with Perry in polls, backtracks on &#8220;insensitive&#8221; claim</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/herman_cain_poll_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/herman_cain_poll_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The surging former pizza magnate doesn't think that rock with the racist word is such a big deal anymore]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having come under <a href="http://motherjones.com/politics/2011/10/herman-cain-rick-perry-niggerhead-controversy">quite a bit of fire from fellow Republicans</a> for claiming that leasing a hunting camp known as "Niggerhead" is "insensitive," Herman Cain has <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/weigel/2011/10/04/niggerhead_revisited_starring_herman_cain.html">backtracked more or less completely</a>, denying that he ever (shudder) "played the race card."</p><p>
    <object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/j4cZ5rx650I?version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/j4cZ5rx650I?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object>
  </p><p>&#160;</p><p>"I really don't care about that word. They painted over it. End of story."</p><p>Cain knows full well that accusing a fellow Republican of "insensitivity" will inflame a conservative base convinced that it is constantly, unfairly accused of harboring racial animosity against black people, Hispanic people, Arab people, and most other groups of non-white people. And that conservative base has, thus far, been surprisingly supportive of Mr. Cain. (Surprisingly not because he's black, but because the guy supported TARP.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/herman_cain_poll_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/herman_cain_poll_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The right and left&#8217;s favorite new insult</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/in_praise_of_corporatism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/in_praise_of_corporatism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Solyndra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10103192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Corporatism" is being denounced by people of all political stripes. But it helped to build America]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Americans are angry about a political system that seems incapable of responding to the needs of ordinary people. Many people have found a new "ism" to denounce: "corporatism." Until recently, "corporatism" referred to government-sponsored cartels. This outlandish word was seldom to be found, except in denunciations by right-wingers of Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal, which, they claimed in their sectarian ghetto literature, was a copy of Mussolini's Italian fascism. (Don't even ask, it's too silly to explain).</p><p>In the last few years, however, the term has broken loose from its moorings, and "corporatism" now seems to have become an elastic, pejorative phrase for any dealings between government and business of any kind, other than arm's-length regulation. A number of conflicting and not necessarily related things are lumped under the ever-more-inclusive term "corporatism"-- everything from public venture capital for emerging technologies to the outsourcing of government functions to for-profit contractors to political contributions by companies and lobbies. A word that once had a narrow and fixed meaning is in danger of becoming an empty, all-purpose insult, like the epithets of "fascism" and "socialism" hurled by conservatives at anyone who disagrees with them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/in_praise_of_corporatism/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/04/in_praise_of_corporatism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>62</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

