<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Rick Warren</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/rick_warren/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A note from Rick Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/note_from_rick_warren/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/note_from_rick_warren/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2011/07/27/note_from_rick_warren</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Saddleback Church pastor explains but backs away from his anti-tax Tweet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote Tuesday about my Twitter exchange with Rev. Rick Warren, the pastor of Saddleback Community Church and author of the best-seller "The Purpose-Driven Life." I had tweaked Warren Monday night for his snarky Tweet about taxes, in the wake of President Obama's plea for a debt-ceiling crisis compromise. You can read it all <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/2011/07/26/walsh_rick_warren/index.html">here</a>.</p><p>Wednesday morning <a href="https://letters.salon.com/opinion/walsh/2011/07/26/walsh_rick_warren/permalink/0711b7d9cd796af3a21ee9602a917104.html">Warren replied in our letters section</a>, and I thought I'd give him the courtesy of putting his reply in a post. It's below. I'm publishing it verbatim, rather than cleaning it up, to capture it accurately. As someone who has certainly wished I could take back a Tweet or two myself, I appreciate Warren's honesty. We disagree about many things, maybe most things, but in this treacherous political climate I respect his work with the poor as well as his willingness to engage with someone on the other political side. You can decide whether you agree with his reasoning yourself, and most of you probably won't.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/note_from_rick_warren/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/28/note_from_rick_warren/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Warren&#8217;s wealth-driven tweet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/26/walsh_rick_warren/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/26/walsh_rick_warren/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//2011/07/26/walsh_rick_warren</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I criticized an anti-tax tweet that was more Limbaugh than Christ. Warren said he'd pray for me -- then deleted it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter was jumping for hours after the Obama-Boehner debt-ceiling throw-down Monday night, but one tweet cut through the chatter. Rev. Rick Warren, the conservative impresario of Saddleback Community Church known for his work on poverty and AIDS issues, let loose mid-evening with the observation:</p><blockquote>
<p>HALF of America pays NO taxes. ZERO. So they're happy for tax rates to be raised on the other half that DOES.</p>
</blockquote><p>That's a right-wing meme spreading wildly of late. It's absolutely false. Thanks to the Earned Income Tax Credit, a bipartisan innovation adopted under President George H.W. Bush and expanded under President Clinton, it's true many low-wage workers pay no taxes and may even get government subsidies to bring them above the poverty line. As many as 47 percent of workers today pay no income tax, a number that jumped substantially during the recession. They do, however, pay payroll taxes and of course the regressive sales tax, which disproportionately burdens the poor, so it's false to say they pay no taxes. If you're not happy with the EITC, you might want to think about what it means that so many jobs pay poverty level wages in the U.S. today. The low-wage workers aren't the moochers; in fact, the subsidies benefit industries that profit from low-wage workforces. But the EITC has become a new obsession of the right wing; Andrew Leonard broke it all down <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2011/05/31/three_lies_about_taxes">here</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/26/walsh_rick_warren/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/26/walsh_rick_warren/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>173</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP candidates and the (delayed, for now) Uganda anti-gay bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/11/uganda_republicans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/11/uganda_republicans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 17:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/11/uganda_republicans</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The evangelicals who trained African religious leaders to fight homosexuality, and the Republicans who need them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was reported earlier today that Uganda's infamous anti-gay legislation <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2011/may/11/uganda-anti-gay-bill">had stalled in the parliament</a>, ending, for now, its chance at becoming law. The Associated Press now says that <a href="http://www.seattlepi.com/news/article/Uganda-s-anti-gay-bill-delayed-amid-outcry-1375046.php">the bill will be taken up again on Friday.</a> The bill, according to its author, no longer specifies a punishment of execution for engaging in homosexual acts. But no one knows what it does say, anymore.</p><p>The role of American evangelical Christians in popularizing anti-LGBT sentiment in Uganda and working directly with the religious leaders responsible for this bill <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/04/world/africa/04uganda.html">has been explored at length since the bill was introduced in 2009</a>. Many American religious right groups have belatedly <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/07/02/church_uganda_gays_bill">distanced themselves from their former allies</a>, but it seems like the damage has already been done.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/11/uganda_republicans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/11/uganda_republicans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rick Warren comes out against Uganda&#8217;s anti-gay bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/10/warren_uganda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/10/warren_uganda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Africa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/10/warren_uganda</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pastor had been pressured to make a statement on legislation that could lead to the death penalty for gays]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Warren -- the pastor whose participation in President Obama's inauguration <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/19/rick_warren/">outraged</a> liberals -- has, over the past month, found himself at the center of a controversy again. This time, he's in hot water over <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/index.html?story=/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/12/08/richard_cohen_uganda">proposed anti-gay legislation</a> in Uganda.</p><p>For weeks, Warren, a stalwart opponent of gay rights in this country, has refused to comment on a bill under consideration in Uganda that, if passed, would make homosexual acts punishable by life imprisonment or even death in some cases. (Salon's Mark Benjamin appeared on the "Rachel Maddow Show" recently to discuss an American whose program was an inspiration for the measure; you can watch that <a href="http://www.salon.com/about/inside_salon/2009/12/09/benjamin_on_maddow_about_curing_gays/index.html">here.</a>) The pastor has been under particular pressure to issue a statement condemning the legislation because of his affiliation with Martin Ssempa, a Ugandan minister who has repeatedly spoken at Warren's Saddleback church and who has unequivocally endorsed the bill. When other American Christian leaders from across the ideological spectrum issued <a href="http://faithinpubliclife.org/content/feature/american_christians_condemn_ug.html">a statement</a> denouncing the proposed law, however, Warren declined to join them.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/10/warren_uganda/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/10/warren_uganda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warren&#8217;s awaited invocation fails to provoke</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/20/warren_invocation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/20/warren_invocation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/01/20/warren_invocation</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The purpose-driven pastor managed to give an invocation without a hint of homophobia.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may recall a little bit of concern on the left about Barack Obama&#8217;s selection of the not-exactly-liberal Rick Warren to perform the inaugural invocation. The megachurch pastor from Southern California, though touted as a new kind of evangelical, has taken traditional, conservative stands on gay rights. (For example, his Web site <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/12/23/warren_site/">called</a> homosexuality &#8220;an enormous sin.&#8221;)</p><p>Well, Warren has just done the deed, and suffice it to say, he left the gay bashing at home in Orange County. Gay-rights groups and liberals can still be mad at his presence (and understandably a little protective of separation of church and state), but it&#8217;s hard to get mad at the specific content of a prayer as stock as it gets. Pastor Rick hit all the classic notes -- the Lord's Prayer, the Shma (Judaism's main prayer -- that bit about "Hear, O&#160;Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord is one). He even danced up close to referring to global warming:</p><blockquote>
<p>Help us to share, to serve, and to seek the common good of all. May all people of goodwill today join together to work for a more just, a more healthy, and more prosperous nation and a peaceful planet.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/20/warren_invocation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/20/warren_invocation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Gene Robinson is too little, too late</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/14/gene_robinson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/14/gene_robinson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/01/14/gene_robinson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inviting an openly gay bishop to Obama's inauguration does not make up for the offensive blunder that is Rick Warren.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Finally</em>:&#160;Nearly four weeks and tons of negative press since Barack Obama announced his choice of the popular -- and notoriously <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/radio/2008/12/18/spaulding/">homophobic</a> and <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2207148/">anti-Semitic</a> -- evangelical pastor Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at the presidential inauguration, Team Obama has gone into damage control mode. Monday morning <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20090112/pl_politico/17340">they announced</a> that Obama has also invited the Rt. Rev. V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire, who was elected the Episcopal Church's first openly gay bishop in 2003, to deliver the invocation for Sunday's kickoff inaugural event on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/01/14/gene_robinson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/01/14/gene_robinson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>83</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warren slams media, bloggers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/23/warren_video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/23/warren_video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/12/23/warren_video</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a video directed at his congregants, controversial pastor Rick Warren criticizes "bloggers who really need to get a life."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a video message addressed to his congregants at&#160;Saddleback Church, Rick Warren has responded to the controversy surrounding the decision to have him deliver the invocation at President-elect Barack Obama's inauguration next month.</p><p>Warren uses the video, which can be viewed below (hat-tip to <a href="http://wonkette.com/405147/rick-warren-rants-against-media-in-youtube-screed">Wonkette</a>) to talk about his stance regarding homosexuality and gay marriage, and to attack the media and especially bloggers because of the controversy.</p><p>"The media never gets it 100 percent correct. I've never seen an in-print article that gets everything right," Warren says, adding, "The media lives for conflict. If there's no conflict, then somebody's going to create it."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/23/warren_video/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/23/warren_video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-gay statements removed from Warren&#8217;s Web site</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/23/warren_site/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/23/warren_site/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/12/23/warren_site</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Language that described homosexuality as "an enormous sin" was deleted from the Internet home of the controversial pastor who'll give the invocation at Barack Obama's inauguration.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Warren just can't keep his name out of the news. Last week, Salon's <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/19/rick_warren/index.html">Mike Madden</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/12/18/warren_fallout/index.html">Tom Schaller</a> detailed both Barack Obama's controversial selection of Warren to speak at the inauguration and the backlash the pick sparked among many of Obama's liberal supporters.</p><p>The main source for the animosity caused by the Warren selection was the pastor's intolerance of homosexuality. For example, the <a href="http://www.saddlebackfamily.com/home/whatwebelieve/index.html#q_49">Web site</a> for Warren's Saddleback Church <a href="http://www.americablog.com/2008/12/rick-warren-explicitly-bans-unrepentant.html">contained language</a> that said "someone unwilling to repent of their homosexual lifestyle would not be accepted at [sic] a member of Saddleback." The site also <a href="http://gawker.com/5116578/rick-warren-removes-gays-not-accepted-sign-from-church-website">described</a> homosexuality as "an enormous sin."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/23/warren_site/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/23/warren_site/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melissa Etheridge meets Rick Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/22/etheridge_warren/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/22/etheridge_warren/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 15:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/12/22/etheridge_warren</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a blog post about the conversation, Etheridge's wife comes to the controversial pastor's defense. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not everyone is that upset about the choice of Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at President-elect Barack Obama's inauguration. Melissa Etheridge, a longtime advocate for gay rights who is herself a lesbian, recently spoke with Warren, and -- judging from a <a href="http://hollywoodfarmgirl.blogspot.com/2008/12/big-ricks-yamaka.html">blog post</a> about the conversation written by Etheridge's wife -- she seems ready to forgive and forget.</p><p>An excerpt from Tammy Lynn Michaels' post, which I've left un-edited:</p><blockquote>
<p>so honey met rick warren last night. well, she spoke to him on the phone beforehand, giving us insight into the man the media has made our latest "HE HATES YOU!" target. if i sit real still and think about it.. it's almost like reverse smear-the-queer... at times, it seems that the media presents us with target after target to smear, as if to say to us, "THIS IS THE GUY HOLDING YOU BACK!! GO GIT 'IM!!!" and it does seem that my lovely gay family is so bruised and bettered and ready to fight back (myself included), that we attack and deem someone ANTI-GAY, and ready to SMEAR, simply when they don't want the word "marriage" brought into our gay ceremonies. now, if the person doesn't want gays AT ALL, then i'm gonna chase that one down. but, i'm starting to think that there are indeed some people... some well-meaning and loving people... who are not at all ANTI-GAY, that's not why they don't want the word marriage used... they are merely RELIGIOUS. and for religious (archaic) reasons, they want to stay safe and respectful to WHAT THEY'VE BEEN TAUGHT.</p>
<p>let me try to differentiate the two.</p>
<p>let's say i am wearing a baseball cap. now what if i want to call it a yamaka? you know- it's basically the same thing, but one is missing the sun visor. i don't call my caps yamakas... cuz that is a religious name for a hat that is worn by religious people. now if i apply that thinking to this situation.... i would like to think of it as.... if they afford us the EXACT SAME RIGHTS, then who cares what it's called? ... joel and hanna can have a piece of paper with the word MARRIAGE on it, and all 1200 rights... and i can have a piece of paper with who-cares on it, and all 1200 rights. the word marriage is a religious, holy, word that people who go to church on sundays are told belongs to them. like yamaka, menorah, or matzo.</p>
<p>rick is not a televangelist. rick is not falwell. rick spoke of some "stupid" things he's said (his word, not mine), some missquotes that were given, and lots of ammunition from the media. all excellent points. (we're all war-minded right now, you know. it's easy for the media to distract us by throwing us into our own verbal wars here at home.) ) what to do, what to do.... the rest of the public is given an animation of rick warren... and then my wife meets the man behind the projections, the quotes, the "OTHER SIDE". and he is warm, caring, effusive, and LOVES gays. since he nearly swallowed honey when he hugged her, i tend to believe him. he wants our gay marriages to be just as respected and embraced as the straight marriages. he just wants to wear his yamaka, and me wear my hat.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/22/etheridge_warren/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/22/etheridge_warren/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>85</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warren misstates marital history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/19/categorically_false/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/19/categorically_false/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/12/19/categorically_false</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Saddleback pastor repeats convenient oversimplification of marriage history.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven't had a chance to read our own Mike Madden's <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/19/rick_warren/index.html">fine reporting</a> and analysis on the Obama-Warren controversy, it's good stuff. One statement from a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7o4QqGbQmU0">video</a> Rev. Rick taped in support of California's Prop 8, as partially quoted by Mike in the piece, really aggravates me.</p><p>That quote is this: "We should not let 2 percent of the population determine to change a definition of marriage" -- that definition being one man and one woman for life, of course, as he states moments earlier in the video -- "that has been supported by every single culture and every single religion for 5,000 years."</p><p>This is simply not true. Different cultures have supported different definitions of marriage, to include the following, ahem, deviations from the pastor's purported pristine, 5,000-year tradition: polygamy, marriages involving children and/or forced marriages, marriages for dowry, divorce and remarriage, and now, increasingly, same-sex marriage.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/19/categorically_false/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/19/categorically_false/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay rights leader rips Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/19/solmonese_complaint/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/19/solmonese_complaint/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/12/19/solmonese_complaint</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Human Rights Campaign president Joe Solmonese gets center page op-ed in today's WaPo.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Human Rights Campaign chief Joe Solmonese gets the <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/12/18/AR2008121802788.html?wpisrc=newsletter">center space</a> of the Washington Post's op-ed page to vent his frustrations to Barack Obama about Rick Warren's invocation speech:</p><blockquote>
<p>One of the biggest reasons for that hurtful outcome was the Rev. Rick Warren, who publicly endorsed Proposition 8 in late October. He told his parishioners and reporters alike that "any pastor could be considered doing hate speech if he shared his views that he didn't think homosexuality was the most natural way for relationships." But civil marriage rights for same-sex couples had nothing whatsoever to do with religion.</p>
<p>More recently, he even compared same-sex marriage to incest, pedophilia and polygamy. He may cloak himself in media-friendly happy talk that plays well on television, but he stands steadfastly against any measure of equality for LGBT Americans.</p>
<p>President-elect Obama must now, as my mother used to say, put some meat on the bone. We've seen appointment after appointment of talented Americans who come from constituencies that are part of this country and that helped gain his election. Well, we're one of those constituencies who actually worked and voted for Obama, unlike Warren and probably most of his 21,000 parishioners. Yet, we're the ones left waiting for some real evidence of inclusion.</p>
<p>So, are we angry about Rick Warren? You bet we are. And including a gay marching band in the inaugural festivities doesn't heal this wound. It only serves to make us question the promises that Barack Obama made in his historic quest to be president. We pray we weren't misled.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/19/solmonese_complaint/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/19/solmonese_complaint/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the hell did Rick Warren get inauguration tickets?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/19/rick_warren_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/19/rick_warren_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/12/19/rick_warren</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama knows liberals are upset he picked the conservative evangelical preacher to pray at the inauguration. And he doesn't care. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more than two years, <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/12/02/obama/">cozying up to Rick Warren</a> has been one of Barack Obama's favorite ways of showing evangelical Christians that he might not be so scary, after all -- and for just as long, palling around with Obama every once in a while has been Warren's way of trying to show more secular-minded people <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2008/08/18/sunday_at_saddleback/">that he's not so bad, either</a>.</p><p>So about the only thing less surprising <a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081229/posner?rel=hp_picks">than the outrage</a> that news of Warren's selection to give the invocation at Obama's inauguration is prompting among gay activists, liberals and Obama supporters generally is probably <a href="http://inaugural.senate.gov/media/releases/release-12172008-inauguralwebsite.cfm">Warren's appearance on the program</a> in the first place. Obama and Warren have often used each other to demonstrate that they'll be willing to listen to people they disagree with -- and yes, also to let everyone know that they'll be willing to anger their friends. This isn't one of those political controversies that pop up out of nowhere without warning; whether they want to admit it or not, it seems Obama's advisors brought on this fight with his own supporters knowing full well what was coming.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/19/rick_warren_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/19/rick_warren_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>479</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama supporters want refunds</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/18/obama_refunds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/18/obama_refunds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/12/18/obama_refunds</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some Obama backers who gave to him express their anger at Change.gov website.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the Huffington Post, Peter Daou <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-daou/rick-warren-and-changegov_b_152052.html">noticed</a> that Obama supporters are expressing their anger at the Change.gov website.</p><p>So I dropped in at Change.gov. It's getting ugly.</p><p>Here's a recent post from somebody named Jacinto Hernandez:</p><blockquote>
<p>Mr Obama,</p>
<p>I am writing to ask that you return the campaign donations made by myself, Jacinto Hernandez, and my husband, Charles Callahan, to your campaign. Chet and I were passionate supporters-- Chet volunteered for weeks at a local phone bank. We attended numerous rallies and fundraisers-- including one with your wife, Michelle (see attached picture) That fund raiser was ostensibly held to court support with the gay community. At that fundraiser, Michelle held my my baby and promised to "not forget us." Yet you have. We worked tirelessly for your campaign-- replacing our yard sign when it was vandalized. So why would you betray the gay community- that stood by you-- and ask Rick Warren to lead your inauguration, when his anti gay rhetoric is dangerous to our family. He also was a huge proponent of proposition 8, that has endangered our family and has eliminated the civil rights of thousands of Californians.</p>
<p>We gave thousands of dollars-- despite the tough economy- in hopes that are community would no longer be marginalized. Despite the passage of prop 8, we celebrated on election day. Today we feel betrayed. There are so many christian leaders who are advocates for the gay community-- why choose one who is not?</p>
<p>Please return our donations immediately. We made donations over a number of occaisions, frequently in response to "urgent" pleas from your campaign. Consider this an "urgent" plea as well.</p>
<p>Please remove us from your mailing lists and never ask us for your support again, unless you stand with us and reject homophobia once and for all.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/18/obama_refunds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/18/obama_refunds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>183</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals fuming about Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/18/warren_fallout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/18/warren_fallout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 16:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/12/18/warren_fallout</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's decision to put Warren on inaugural stage has infuriated some of his supporters.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Liberal anger and disappointment over the decision by Barack Obama to ask Rick Warren to give an invocation at the inauguration ceremony next month continues to mount. The substance of the complaints includes the expected transgressions: Warren's opposition to gay rights (including, most recently, asking his followers to back California's Prop 8); his equating of abortion to the Holocaust; his rejection of evolution.</p><p>But the analyses and critiques are taking some interesting turns:</p><ul>
<li>Sarah Posner, who has written extensively about evangelical politics for the American Prospect, has a <a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc/20081229/posner?rel=hp_picks">great essay</a> in the Nation, which she concludes as follows: "Warren represents the absolute worst of the Democrats' religious outreach, a right-winger masquerading as a do-gooder anointed as the arbiter of what it means to be faithful. Obama's religious outreach was intended, supposedly, to make religious voters more comfortable with him and feel included in the Democratic Party. But that outreach now has come at the expense of other people's comfort and inclusion, at an event meant to mark a turning point away from divisive politics."</li>
<li>Ezra Klein of the Prospect <a href="http://www.prospect.org/csnc/blogs/ezraklein_archive?month=12&amp;year=2008&amp;base_name=the_meaning_of_open_and_inclus">discusses</a> what the choice means for "inclusiveness," ostensibly the principle gain of inviting Warren: "The going explanation for Warren's presence on the inauguration podium is that 'this aims to be the most open and inclusive inauguration in history,' as Linda Douglas, a spokeswoman for the inauguration committee, told Politico. It's a peculiar definition of 'open and inclusive.' Warren, after all, is the only preacher giving the invocation. He will not share the stage with a rabbi, an imam, a monk, and an episcopalian. And Warren is not being chosen because he himself is open and inclusive . . . The tolerance Obama is asking for, in other words, is <em>not from Warren</em>. It's from the LGBT community, and women. He is asking <em>them</em> to be tolerant of Warren's intolerance. It's a cruel play, framed to marginalize the legitimate anger of those who Warren harms and discriminates against."</li>
<li>And Mark Kleiman <a href="http://www.samefacts.com/archives/religion_and_politics_/2008/12/religionofpeace_dept.php">has some fun</a> imagining if a similar move had been made in Iran: "Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has chosen a fundamentalist imam to give the opening prayer at the next meeting of the majlis. The Hojatolislam Rukh al-Warun is considered 'moderate' by Iranian standards, but that merely illustrates how completely insane Iranian Islam has become. For example, asked whether sharia supported 'taking out' George W. Bush, al-Warun replied, 'The Prophet, Peace be upon him, has said, 'Allah puts government on Earth to punish evil-doers.' And it is written in the Holy Qu'ran that evil cannot be bargained with; it must be brought to an end. That is the legitimate goal of government.' "</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/12/18/warren_fallout/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/12/18/warren_fallout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The attention-driven Warren, Book III</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/18/book_three/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/18/book_three/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/08/18/book_three</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fishers of men need the right bait, and Rick Warren's television show had two presidential nominees on the end of the line.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delving a bit deeper into this Dan Gilgoff <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/godometer/2008/08/rick-warren-to-godometer-obama.html">interview</a> with Rick Warren, notice that the pastor essentially concedes that a) he knew Barack Obama's position on choice and that the Democratic presidential candidate wasn't going to shift that position; and b) that, of course, not defining life as beginning at conception was a deal breaker for Warren and most of his followers anyway, no matter what else Obama might say. </p><p>Though abortion is but one issue, and there has arguably been some movement and even growing agreement between the candidates and parties on other issues (e.g., human trafficking and environmental protection), in the end not much in the way of news or new commitments was elicited from either Obama or John McCain. I'm guessing few evangelicals changed their candidate preferences as a result. Perhaps some nonevangelicals did, and that is an important electoral consequence. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/18/book_three/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/18/book_three/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The attention-driven Warren, Book II</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/18/warren_two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/18/warren_two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/08/18/warren_two</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Warren gets defensive when pressed again about the "cone of silence."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Warren is really milking the media circuit. <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/godometer/2008/08/rick-warren-to-godometer-obama.html">Here</a> he interviews with Beliefnet's Dan Gilgoff, a fine reporter and author of the definitive book on James Dobson. (Only portions of the interview have been published thus far.) </p><p>Gilgoff presses Warren about whether John McCain had an unfair advantage. Warren gets very, very defensive. But even if there was no intentional favoritism -- even if McCain was just running late to the debate -- why did Warren very plainly claim as Barack Obama was coming onstage that McCain was at that very moment in some soundproof room. Last time I checked, this violates one of the Commandments. This is the exchange:<br />
<blockquote></p><p><b>Dan Gilgoff:</b> Some Obama supporters are claiming that McCain saw the questions before the forum began, giving him a leg up on Obama. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/18/warren_two/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/18/warren_two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The attention-driven Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/18/about_him/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/18/about_him/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2008/08/18/about_him</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The power play we saw at Saddleback proves that when it comes to self-regard the difference between preachers and politicians is a matter of style, but not degree.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"It's not about you." </p><p>That is the first line of Rick Warren's mega-selling, self-help, orthodoxy-lite book, "The Purpose-Driven Life." Funny, but that forum Saturday night with the two major presidential nominees sure looked like it was a lot about Rick Warren. </p><p>Warren talked about how both men are his friends. He often spent longer on questions than he needed to. He made a big fuss taking photos, first, with him and Obama, then with Obama and McCain, and then just with McCain. </p><p>It was more than a glory-shot moment for Warren. It was his evangelical moonshot. </p><p>And the message as he bounded around in his moon boots? Move over James Dobson and the rest of you haters: The mantle of Billy Graham and Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell has been passed to a new generation of leaders, and that new generation is me. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2008/08/18/about_him/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2008/08/18/about_him/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Left turn at Saddleback Church</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/02/obama_155/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/02/obama_155/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sam Brownback, R-Kan.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2006/12/02/obama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Barack Obama received a warm welcome at an AIDS conference held by Rick "Purpose-Driven Life" Warren. But that doesn't mean evangelicals are ready to lay down their cross for Democrats.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As he opened his remarks Friday at a World AIDS Day summit at Rick Warren's Saddleback Church, Republican Sen. Sam Brownback said he was feeling a little more "comfortable" than he did the last time he shared a stage with Barack Obama. "We were both addressing the NAACP," Brownback explained. "They were very polite to me  [but] I think they kind of wondered, 'Who's this guy from Kansas?' And then Barack Obama follows, and they're going, 'OK, now we've got Elvis.'" </p><p>Figuring their joint appearance at an Orange County evangelical church finally put the shoe on the other foot, Brownback turned to Obama and said, "Welcome to <i>my</i> house." The audience of evangelicals howled with laughter. But when Obama had the chance to speak a few minutes later, he returned to what Brownback had said: "There is one thing I've got to say, Sam: This is my house, too. This is God's house." </p><p>Everyone laughed again -- neither Brownback's opening nor Obama's comeback were offered with the rancor that a cold retelling of them probably suggests -- but the point had been made anyway. In Obama's eyes, at least, the Republican Party can no longer claim ownership of all things evangelical. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2006/12/02/obama_155/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2006/12/02/obama_155/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Still an angel?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/10/01/ashley/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/10/01/ashley/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 22:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/10/01/ashley</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ashley Smith was sainted by conservatives for reading "The Purpose-Driven Life" to her captor. Now she admits to also giving him crystal meth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class='wp-image-10041096' src='http://media.salon.com/2005/10/story.jpg' />Last March, the media devoted days to the tale of a young Atlanta woman who'd negotiated her way out of captivity at the hands of a fugitive murderer. It was a gripping story that was impossible to ignore. And with the moral-values hullabaloo of Election '04 still echoing nationwide, religious conservatives levitated the story to the realm of fable. </p><p>Ashley Smith, a 27-year-old widowed mother with a young daughter, had been taken hostage in her own apartment by Brian Nichols, an African-American man who had fled from an Atlanta courthouse where he'd just shot and killed four people, including a judge. Round-the-clock coverage focused on how, during her ordeal, Smith pulled out Rick Warren's mega-selling evangelical book, "The Purpose-Driven Life," and read to Nichols from a chapter called "Using What God Gave Me" to gain his empathy and trust. He eventually let her go, and she alerted the authorities, who arrested Nichols without incident. </p><p>"I think God gave this young lady a supernatural empathy and compassion for someone that most anybody else would have tried to kill," the Rev. H.B. London, a vice president for ministry at Focus on the Family, said back on March 16. "Every Christian organization in the country will want to tell her story." </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/10/01/ashley/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/10/01/ashley/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Money-Driven Life?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/21/money_driven/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/21/money_driven/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/03/21/money_driven</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In honor of Ashley Smith, the ministry backing Rick Warren's Evangelical bestseller offers a special non-exploitation deal -- for a limited time only.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of the religious right and exploitation: A Salon reader alerted us to an intriguing email from Andrew Accardy, an executive vice president of <a href="http://www.purposedriven.com/en-US/Home.htm " target="_blank">Purpose Driven Ministries,</a> regarding last week's media frenzy over hostage hero <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/right_hook/2005/03/18/faith_in_ashley/index.html" target="_blank">Ashley Smith.</a> The ministry affiliated with Rick Warren's blockbuster Evangelical book, "The Purpose-Driven Life" (which Smith reported was instrumental in persuading her captor, Brian Nichols, to free her and her daughter), wanted to make a point about its benevolent intentions with regard to the headline news. From the email: </p><p>"From: Purpose Driven Ministries<br /> "Subject: God makes the waves, and we just ride them<br /> "Date: 17 Mar 2005 </p><p>"Dear Colleague in Ministry, </p><p>"As Rick Warren taught us in his book, The Purpose Driven Church, our job as church leaders is to recognize a wave of God's Spirit and ride it. God makes the waves, and we, like experienced surfers, just ride them ... Only God could create a wave of this kind, allowing Ashley Smith to share her testimony across the country while generating interest in a discipleship tool such as 'The Purpose Driven Life.' </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/03/21/money_driven/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/21/money_driven/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

