<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Rielle Hunter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/rielle_hunter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Edwards details implosion of her marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/elizabeth_edwards_talks_about_leaving_john/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/elizabeth_edwards_talks_about_leaving_john/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/06/29/elizabeth_edwards_talks_about_leaving_john</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a new chapter of her memoir, out in paperback, she talks about saying goodbye to 30 years of memories]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Edwards says it was not easy to leave her husband in the wake of the two-time presidential contender's infidelity, writing in a new chapter to her memoir that she still sees in him the memories of their 30 years together.</p><p>Edwards says in the updated version of her book released Tuesday that she spent two years trying to "reinvent" her role as a wife so that they could stay together despite the affair. But she says the "tender thread" holding the family together unraveled at the very end of 2009 -- three years after John Edwards first told his wife in private that he'd had a one-night stand with a videographer.</p><p>"One day, I did not want to try anymore," she said.</p><p>The couple has since separated and he acknowledged fathering a child with mistress Rielle Hunter during his 2008 campaign for the White House. The 2004 Democratic vice presidential nominee also acknowledged a federal investigation into his campaign funds, with former campaign aide Andrew Young saying a grand jury asked questions about money used to keep Hunter in hiding during the presidential race.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/elizabeth_edwards_talks_about_leaving_john/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/elizabeth_edwards_talks_about_leaving_john/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rielle Hunter&#8217;s undeniable awfulness</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/rielle_hunter_oprah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/rielle_hunter_oprah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/04/29/rielle_hunter_oprah</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Even Oprah Winfrey couldn't hide her disdain for the woman who seeks the "truth" while talking nonsense]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Oprah Winfrey begins one of her hour-long interviews with a question like, "Is it true that no one in your life thinks it's a good idea for you to be talking to me?" it is often an auspicious sign that an audience should buckle its seat belts and get ready for a bumpy hour. But in the case of Winfrey's Thursday interview with Rielle Hunter, the mistress of John Edwards and mother of his fifth child, the opening question should have served as fair warning:</p><p>Nothing about Rielle Hunter's decision to sit down with Winfrey on Thursday was a good idea.</p><p>Hunter repeatedly claimed that she was doing this to correct a flawed public record about herself. And I can see it, can stretch far enough into the heart-wants-what-the-heart-wants school of domestic complexity to consider that during this turgid scandal, in which Hunter carried on an affair with Edwards while his wife was battling cancer and he was running for president, Hunter might have gotten the fuzzy end of the press's lollipop, that the enforced silence might have left her misrepresented as the heat-seeking, home-wrecking strumpet of our pulp fictive fantasies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/rielle_hunter_oprah/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/30/rielle_hunter_oprah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>188</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rielle Hunter says she didn&#8217;t wreck Edwards home</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/29/us_winfrey_rielle_hunter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/29/us_winfrey_rielle_hunter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/04/29/us_winfrey_rielle_hunter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former North Carolina Senator's mistress appears on "The Oprah Winfrey Show"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Edwards' mistress said on Thursday's episode of "The Oprah Winfrey Show" that she doesn't believe she destroyed the former presidential candidate's marriage.</p><p>"It is not my experience that a third party wrecks a home," Rielle Hunter told Winfrey. "I believe the problems exist before a third party comes into the picture."</p><p>"So you don't think you wrecked his home?" Winfrey asked Hunter.</p><p>"I do not believe I wrecked his home," Hunter said.</p><p>Hunter's appearance on Winfrey's show is her first televised interview since the former North Carolina senator first admitted two years ago that he had an affair with her. In January, Edwards said he and Hunter have a 2-year-old daughter after initially denying it. He and his wife, Elizabeth Edwards are now separated.</p><p>Hunter told Winfrey she believes people see her negatively because of the affair.</p><p>"A lot of people bought into the myth of the marriage, the Edwards' marriage as being a storybook story and it was so perfect and so wonderful and I destroyed it," Hunter said. "It fits into the two-dimensional story line."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/29/us_winfrey_rielle_hunter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/29/us_winfrey_rielle_hunter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In defense of Rielle Hunter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/15/defending_rielle_hunter_open2010/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/15/defending_rielle_hunter_open2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/03/15/defending_rielle_hunter_open2010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She's been called a villain and a slut, but I think she's just naive]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit, I'm captivated by the Rielle Hunter/John Edwards story. I <a href="http://kepkanation.wordpress.com/2008/08/08/gossip-blogs-forgive-me">have been for a while</a>. I know it's wrong. I know it makes me some kind of leech or lecher or... loser? Something starting with an L. I just can't stop looking, and wondering.</p><p>And it gets worse. I feel bad for Rielle Hunter. I don't think she's a villain, a slut, an animal huntress who preyed on the slimy husband of a sick woman. I think she's dizzyingly naive and the ultimate product of the 90s New Age movement: someone who really thinks Being Is Free, that there's no cost higher than the cost of not being yourself. You put that woman anywhere near John Edwards, whose core belief seems to be that Being Is Whatever It Takes To Be President, and you're going to get not only fireworks but also first-degree burns.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/15/defending_rielle_hunter_open2010/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/15/defending_rielle_hunter_open2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rielle Hunter, home-wrecking relationship guru</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/15/rielle_hunter_gq_john_edwards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/15/rielle_hunter_gq_john_edwards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/03/15/rielle_hunter_gq_john_edwards</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a GQ interview, John Edwards' mistress dishes on how to not make the same mistakes Elizabeth made]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are plenty of surprises in <a href="http://www.gq.com/news-politics/politics/201004/rielle-hunter-john-edwards-exclusive-interview?printable=true&amp;currentPage=9">GQ's candid interview</a> with Rielle Hunter, John Edwards' mistress and the mother of his child. For starters, the <a href="http://www.gq.com/news-politics/politics/201004/rielle-hunter-john-edwards-exclusive-slideshow#slide=1">accompanying photos</a>, one of which shows the 45-year-old lounging on a bed in just an oversize dress shirt (could it be <em>John's</em>?) accompanied by a gaggle of stuffed animals and a human-size Dora the Explorer doll.</p><p>This happened. Like, this photograph <em>actually exists</em>, people.</p><p>Beyond that head-shaker, there is the revelation that Hunter -- who seems every bit the self-righteous, self-mythologizing New Age kook&#160;she's been portrayed as during her years of media silence -- fancies herself as a romance guru, a mistress turned relationship expert.&#160;Her romantic approach can be most succinctly summed up as: the exact opposite of Elizabeth Edwards'. In Hunter's view, she has gotten right everything that Elizabeth got wrong. Johnny, as she calls him throughout the interview, is 100 percent truthful with her, Hunter says, because "he has no fear that I'm going to abuse him." She continues:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/15/rielle_hunter_gq_john_edwards/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/15/rielle_hunter_gq_john_edwards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Joy Behar&#8217;s TMI moment with Andrew Young</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/04/andrew_young_on_joy_behar/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/04/andrew_young_on_joy_behar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2010/02/04/andrew_young_on_joy_behar</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The talk show host asks the tough questions about Rielle Hunter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there's one good thing to come out of the bottomlessly tawdry ongoing revelations about John Edwards, it's the way they&#8217;ve put our jaded, seen-it-all psyches right back in touch with their capacity to be genuinely skeeved out.</p><p>The man who there but for the grace of God might have been our Democratic presidential contender made <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2010/01/29/hunter_video/index.html">a sex tape</a> with his mistress Rielle Hunter? He allegedly was mixed up in <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/feature/2010/02/03/john_edwards_hit/index.html">domestic altercations</a>?&#160; It's enough to make one beg for fresh revelations from <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/12/29/charlie_sheen_911/index.html">Charlie Sheen</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/feature/2009/12/29/meltdown/index.html">Tila Tequila</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/04/andrew_young_on_joy_behar/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/04/andrew_young_on_joy_behar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Confirmation of a John Edwards sex tape?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/hunter_video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/hunter_video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/01/29/hunter_video</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter gets court order seeking return of videos of "personal and private nature"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems impossible to believe that a politician with presidential ambitions -- especially one actually in the midst of <em>running</em> for president -- could be stupid enough to actually make a sex tape. That's especially true if said politician happens to be married, and his co-star is someone other than his wife.</p><p>But John Edwards really may have done it.</p><p>That's what Andrew Young, a former aide, has been claiming. And now, with Young -- who, to cover up for his boss, initially claimed Edwards' daughter with Rielle Hunter was his -- publishing a tell-all and doing a big interview with ABC&#160;News, there's new information that adds some credibility to his claim.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/hunter_video/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/29/hunter_video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Edwards admitted paternity now</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/edwards_young/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/edwards_young/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/01/21/edwards_young</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former aide about to tell all, including allegation boss wanted him to fake paternity test]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So John Edwards finally <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/01/21/edwards_paternity/index.html">confessed</a> to what everyone pretty much already knew: He's the father of Quinn Hunter, the daughter of his former girlfriend Rielle Hunter. In doing so, he also implicitly admitted that even when he confessed to the affair back in 2008, he was still lying about the relationship -- he said at the time that it had ended in 2006, but Quinn Hunter was born in February of 2008.</p><p>Why admit it now? Why not just keep clinging to the fiction, secure in the knowledge that no one believed him anyway? Well, a spokesman told Politico it was because, "There was just a lot of stuff that needed to be figured out. There were a lot of kids to talk to, which is not an easy thing ... The whole question of the child support agreement &#8212; that was what triggered this particular timing. That was the last piece."</p><p>It's certainly possible that's true. But there appears to be a much likelier explanation:&#160;Edwards' former aide Andrew Young, the one who initially claimed Quinn Hunter was his child in an attempt to shield his boss, has a tell-all book coming out soon. And one week from Friday, Young's <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/john-edwards-admits-fathered-child-affair/story?id=9620812">interview with ABC&#160;News' "20/20"</a> was scheduled to air.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/edwards_young/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/21/edwards_young/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Edwards: Divorce, finally?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/01/edwards_divorce/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/01/edwards_divorce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/10/01/edwards_divorce</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Enquirer says she's had enough. It's about time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have read most of the coverage of the Elizabeth/John/Rielle show with the kind of revulsion I usually reserve for guts and gore. But I have to admit, when I <a href="http://www.nationalenquirer.com/john_edwards_elizabeth_53_million_dollars_divorce_other_mistresses/celebrity/67405">read this morning</a> that Elizabeth Edwards may be gearing up for divorce, it seemed like one of the saner responses to the whole sorry saga.&#160;(The story should be taken with a healthy dose of skepticism, of course. Though the National Enquirer has been accurate thus far with the Edwards saga, most of its sources have &#160;been in Rielle Hunter's camp. It's odd that, at this point, sources close to Elizabeth Edwards would talk to the paper.)</p><p>What finally pushed Elizabeth over the edge? According to an unnamed source, it was the allegations soon to be published in a tell-all memoir by former campaign aide Andrew Young -- the same married father of three who briefly covered for Edwards by claiming he was the father of Rielle Hunter's child -- that Hunter "wasn't the only woman [Edwards] seduced on the campaign trail." If that were true, the source says, "she'd have to divorce him, because then he'd be a &#8216;serial cheater.'"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/10/01/edwards_divorce/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/10/01/edwards_divorce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What is John Edwards waiting for?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/21/edwards_paternity_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/21/edwards_paternity_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/09/21/edwards_paternity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is the politician going to announce that he's the father of Rielle Hunter's baby, or what?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil A. Lewis of <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/20/us/politics/20edwards.html?bl">the New York Times</a> reported over the weekend that John Edwards is thinking of publicly confirming that he's the father of Rielle Hunter's 19-month-old baby. This comes a month after North Carolina television station WRAL <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/08/13/edwards/index.html">reported the same thing</a>, which was right around the time the National Enquirer announced that "secret DNA testing" had already proven it. And going by the tabloid's track record on this story, that means it stands a pretty good chance of being true.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/09/21/edwards_paternity_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/09/21/edwards_paternity_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Edwards, you ARE the father</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/13/edwards_paternity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/13/edwards_paternity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2009/08/13/edwards_paternity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Enquirer says "secret DNA testing" proves that, yup, he's the dad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surprising exactly no one -- except, possibly, John Edwards' spokesperson, whose leisure dinner Wednesday night was very likely interrupted by approximately five billion calls -- the <a href="http://www.nationalenquirer.com/john_edwards_secret_dna_test_proves_paternity_mistress_testifies_federalgrand_jury_/celebrity/67120">National Enquirer</a> is reporting that "secret DNA tests" prove Rielle Hunter's 18-month-old daughter Frances is, in fact, the spawn of a particular former presidential candidate. (Hint: It's not Dennis Kucinich.)</p><p>Sure,&#160; take it all with a grain of salt or ten:&#160;This <em>is</em> the National Enquirer --&#160; but that's the pub that broke <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2008/08/09/john_edwards/">news of the affair</a>, and it <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2008/07/25/edwards/">hasn't been wrong</a> about the story yet. If the report proves true, then we can finally end this charade about "who's really the dad," and families can start healing, and <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/feature/2009/05/08/edwards_oprah/">long-suffering wives</a> can start accepting, and politicians can stop lying -- or, at the very least, child support arrangements can be made, stat.</p><p>Last Thursday, as War Room reported, <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/2009/08/06/hunter/index.html">Hunter testified</a> in front of a grand jury to determine whether or not campaign funds were illegally funneled to her. So the twists may keep coming, but perhaps one chapter is (dare we dream?) closed.</p><p>At this time, Edwards has no plans, <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wbLdYeZvoc">sadly</a>, to <a href="http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2009/05/12/edwards/index.html">appear on Maury Povich</a>.</p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/13/edwards_paternity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/13/edwards_paternity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who you calling white trash?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/12/flanagan_gurley_brown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/12/flanagan_gurley_brown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//feature/2009/08/12/flanagan_gurley_brown</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a new essay, Caitlin Flanagan rips into Helen Gurley Brown, the steno pool and adulterers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh. The September issue of the Atlantic is online once again and with it yet another <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200909/sex-married-man">vitriolic essay</a> by our favorite antihero, the stay-at-home-mother-with-help, moral scold Caitlin Flanagan. Having worked her way through the mommy wars and the emotional lives of teenage girls (on which she is still, presumably, writing a book), Flanagan has seemed, as of late, particularly concerned with letting us all know that adultery is <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/04/21/flanagan/index.html">very</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/07/07/flanagan_marriage/index.html">very</a> bad.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/12/flanagan_gurley_brown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/12/flanagan_gurley_brown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Edwards&#8217; mistress testifying in grand jury investigation?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/06/hunter_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/06/hunter_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 14:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/08/06/hunter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter was at a federal courthouse Thursday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A&#160;federal grand jury is still investigating former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., looking into the question of whether his campaign funds were illegally used to provide money for his mistress, Rielle Hunter. On Thursday, it <a href="http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/5740200/">appeared</a> that Hunter herself was called to testify.</p><p>Grand jury proceedings are secret, so thus far no one's been able to confirm that Hunter -- who brought her daughter, Frances, allegedly her child with Edwards -- was actually there to testify. But the grand jury had just reconvened, and it's not as if she could just sit and watch the proceedings.</p><p><script src="http://www.wral.com/news/local/video/5740200/?version=embedded" type="text/javascript"></script> <script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
 width=330; height=280; wral_insert_video_player_5740200(width,height); 
//]]></script></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/08/06/hunter_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/08/06/hunter_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did Edwards staffers plan to sabotage his campaign?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/11/sabotage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/11/sabotage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 15:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/05/11/sabotage</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aides, concerned that the candidate's affair would mean a GOP victory in 2008, reportedly decided not to let him get the Democratic nomination. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC&#160;News' George Stephanopoulos <a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2009/05/edwards-staff-h.html">dropped a bombshell</a> Sunday: In late 2007 and early 2008, staffers on John Edwards' presidential campaign came to believe the rumors he was having an affair -- and decided to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-sbqIyeed4g">sabotage</a> him if it seemed he might win the Democratic nomination.</p><p>"Basically, if it looked like Edwards was going to win the Democratic Party nomination, they were going to sabotage his campaign, several former Edwards' staffers have told me," Stephanopoulos reported.</p><p>"They said they were Democrats first, and if it looked like Edwards was going to become the nominee, they were going to bring down the campaign."</p><p>If it's true, this is pretty amazing; perhaps even unprecedented. Of course, it could also be a bit of ass-covering from people who want to continue careers in politics and have seen the reaction to the news that Edwards went ahead and ran even though he knew his affair could leak.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/11/sabotage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/11/sabotage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Edwards&#8217; walk of pain</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/08/edwards_oprah/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/08/edwards_oprah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 10:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infidelity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2009/05/08/edwards_oprah</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was excruciating to watch the tough and brilliant cancer survivor talk about her husband's betrayal on "Oprah Winfrey." Just as bad was witnessing the depth of her denial. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've been watching "The Oprah Winfrey Show" here and there since well before I was in high school. In my time, I've caught some doozies -- the heroin-addicted family, Tom Cruise on the couch, You Get a Car. I've laughed; I've cried; I've wished the show wouldn't end; I've screamed to make it stop. Yet I cannot remember an hour spent with Ms. Winfrey over the past three decades that has felt more like slowly pushing rusty fishhooks through my eyeballs than the one on Thursday, during which I watched her interview Elizabeth Edwards about her husband's extramarital affair.</p><p>I am not the only person wondering, this week, as we commence one of the most sadomasochistic publicity jaunts in political history, what on earth Edwards is trying to accomplish by holding forth about her personal pain and exposing herself and her family not only to further gossip and humiliation, but to political censure. Her conversation with Oprah (which was so raw and extensive that at one point it made me do something a talk show <em>never</em> has: heave a monstrous and unwilling sob) was a good reminder of why Elizabeth is such a compelling player in this drama, and, alas, offered an opportunity to guess at some twistingly sad answers.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/05/08/edwards_oprah/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/05/08/edwards_oprah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>242</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Grand jury investigating Edwards over mistress</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/03/edwards_36/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/03/edwards_36/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Edwards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rielle Hunter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/04/03/edwards</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal grand jury is reportedly looking in to whether the former senator violated campaign finance laws with payments to Rielle Hunter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal grand jury is reportedly investigating whether former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., violated campaign finance laws by making payments to his mistress, Rielle Hunter.</p><p>The National Enquirer was <a href="http://www.nationalenquirer.com/john_edwards_grand_jury_convenes/celebrity/66455">the first</a> to report the story, which has since been picked up by outlets in North Carolina, Edwards' home and the reported location of the grand jury. The tabloid is often thought of as untrustworthy, but it has a solid record on these types of stories, and it consistently led other media outlets in reporting Edwards' affair.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/03/edwards_36/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/03/edwards_36/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

