<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > RNC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/rnc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 20:27:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Will the Christian right flee the GOP?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/will_social_conservatives_flee_gop_form_3rd_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/will_social_conservatives_flee_gop_form_3rd_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican civil war heats up as social conservatives feel abandoned and threaten to form a third party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will social conservatives really make good on their threats, and form their own political party? With the course of history and their own political allies leaving them in the dust, the group is facing an existential crisis that has left them at the nadir of their power with no obvious path to recovery -- and now they're getting desperate.</p><p>Inside the conservative movement, the Tea Party has displaced evangelical activists as the dynamic force, pushing economic issues ahead of social ones, while voters affirmed their support for gay rights and punished candidates with restrictionist views on abortion in 2012. In their "autopsy report," the Republican National Committee essentially suggested abandoning social conservatives -- despite leaning on them heavily just a few years ago to elect and reelect George W. Bush -- and even the movement conservatives at CPAC had <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/at-cpac-the-marriage-fight-is-over">little appetite</a> for the Christian-right causes of yore.</p><p>Needless to say, social conservatives who are not happy about this state of affairs are lashing out against their friends, threatening to leave the GOP if it doesn't join them on the wrong side of history.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/will_social_conservatives_flee_gop_form_3rd_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/will_social_conservatives_flee_gop_form_3rd_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lady Gaga reportedly turned down $1 million offer to perform at RNC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/lady_gaga_reportedly_turned_down_1_million_offer_to_perform_at_rnc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/lady_gaga_reportedly_turned_down_1_million_offer_to_perform_at_rnc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report from the Examiner alleges that the GOP was interested in Pitbull and Dolly Parton, too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/lady-gaga-turned-down-1-million-to-perform-at-rnc/article/2525899">Washington Examiner</a> reports that the GOP, a party whose stance towards gays <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/">has been nothing if not fraught</a>, approached <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/lady-gaga-gay-rights">LGBTQ icon</a> Lady Gaga to perform at the Republican National Convention's Hispanic Leadership Network last August. Sourcing a lawsuit filed by GOP fundraiser American Action Network against production company Cater America LLC, the Examinar claims that Gaga was offered $1 million to perform. Dolly Parton and Pitbull were approached as well.</p><p>AAN's Pete Meachum told the Examiner that Cater America head Rob Jennings said, "See what it would take to get Gaga instead of Dolly."</p><p>From the Examiner:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/lady_gaga_reportedly_turned_down_1_million_offer_to_perform_at_rnc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/lady_gaga_reportedly_turned_down_1_million_offer_to_perform_at_rnc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strategist in RNC reboot calls Obama a &#8220;socialist&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/strategist_in_rnc_reboot_calls_obama_a_socialist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/strategist_in_rnc_reboot_calls_obama_a_socialist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haley Barbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Barbour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Henry Barbour, the nephew of former governor Haley Barbour, was an author of the RNC's plan to reshape the party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry Barbour, the nephew of the former governor of Mississippi and an author of the RNC's plan to reboot the party and broaden its appeal, thinks President Obama is a "socialist."</p><p>"We all want to make America strong economically and militarily and every other way but you can't do that if you're not in office," he told <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/288845-leader-in-gops-reboot-calls-obama-a-socialist">The Hill</a>. "We've got a socialist in office right now — how's that working for us?"</p><p>When pressed on his choice of words, Barbour said: "I don't care. I mean, look, I think he's a socialist. I'm not saying he doesn't love our country," he said. "No, I don't care."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/strategist_in_rnc_reboot_calls_obama_a_socialist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/strategist_in_rnc_reboot_calls_obama_a_socialist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social conservatives slam RNC for supporting Rob Portman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/social_conservatives_slam_rnc_for_supporting_rob_portman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/social_conservatives_slam_rnc_for_supporting_rob_portman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Portman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phyllis Schlafly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC shouldn't be "pandering idiots," they said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social conservatives told the RNC not to be "pandering idiots," after Chairman Reince Priebus stood by Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, who over the weekend came out in support of same-sex marriage.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/343311/social-conservatives-rnc-don-t-be-pandering-idiots-betsy-woodruff">National Review Online</a>:</p><blockquote><p>“I think [the RNC] should pretty much ignore him,” says Phyllis Schlafly, a longtime conservative activist, in an interview with National Review Online. “I think he has made a mistake, and he probably won’t get reelected.”</p> <p>Ralph Reed, the founder of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, says the party has to be careful. “If the Republican party tries to retreat from being a pro-marriage, pro-family party, the big tent is going to become a pup tent very fast,” he says. “I am concerned that some in the party are going wobbly on this issue.”</p></blockquote><p>Brian Brown, of the National Organization for Marriage, told NRO that Portman will now likely get a challenger in the primary. “This is a critical issue, and to act like it’s just no big deal is just wrong."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/social_conservatives_slam_rnc_for_supporting_rob_portman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/social_conservatives_slam_rnc_for_supporting_rob_portman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have Republicans read their new rebranding report?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/have_republicans_read_their_new_rebranding_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/have_republicans_read_their_new_rebranding_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Perez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hours into its new outreach effort to minorities, the party is already trashing Obama's new Latino labor secretary]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How serious are Republicans about their effort to reach out to minorities, one of the core doctrines of their big new <a href="http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/623752-rnc-report-growth-opportunity-book-2013.html#document/p2">Growth and Opportunity Project</a> report they released this morning? We may find out pretty quickly with a series of tests that will demonstrate whether Republican elites at the Republican National Committee can control the more unsavory elements in the base.</p><p>The report says "we have to engage" minority voters "and show our sincerity.” A first test of that strategy approached them almost instantly, with President Obama’s nomination today of Tom Perez to serve as labor secretary. And so far, they don't seem to be implementing it very deftly.</p><p>Perez, who is currently the head of the Department of Justice’ Civil Rights Division, has had his name dragged through the mud over factually inaccurate, race-baiting charges of impropriety. Some conservatives claim that Perez, a Latino working under the first black president and first black attorney general in history, dismissed a case against a handful of New Black Panther activists in some kind gesture of racial solidarity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/have_republicans_read_their_new_rebranding_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/have_republicans_read_their_new_rebranding_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC chairman asked about CPAC&#8217;s failed racism panel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC launched a new initiative for minority outreach, shortly after CPAC's ill-fated panel on race]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In announcing the Republican National Committee's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%E2%80%9Cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/">plans for minority outreach</a>, Chairman Reince Priebus was asked about CPAC's panel on race that went terribly awry, and how Republicans plan to address members of the base who still hold those kinds of views of minorities.</p><p>"Question about CPAC last week, where a panel on African-American voters dissolved into a shouting match with at least one activist saying that -- talking about voters being systematically disenfranchised. How, given that sort of backdrop in the party, do you plan to overcome those challenges in your role at the RNC?" said National Press Club president Angela Greiling Keane, reading from a written question, during a press conference with Priebus at the National Press Club.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh slams RNC rebrand plan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/limbaugh_slams_rnc_rebrand_plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/limbaugh_slams_rnc_rebrand_plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limabaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The radio host says the GOP is getting "bamboozled" -- and that real problem is they're not conservative enough]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh is not a fan of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%E2%80%9Cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/">the new report</a> released this morning by the Republican National Committee about what the party needs to do to rebrand itself, saying the RNC completely misunderstood the lessons of the 2012 election.</p><p>"The Republicans are just getting totally bamboozled right now. And they are entirely lacking in confidence. Which is what happens to every political party after an election in which they think they got shellacked," the influential conservative radio host told his listeners this morning. "They think they got landslided, but they didn't."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/limbaugh_slams_rnc_rebrand_plan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/limbaugh_slams_rnc_rebrand_plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP expert: Anti-gay views hurting party&#8217;s tech recruitment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RNC's former digital strategist says her party's anti-gay views are hurting its recruitment of vital tech talent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its massive <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/130960510/Growth-Opportunity-Project">autopsy report</a> released Monday, the Republican National Committee says the party needs to get a lot better at technology if it ever hopes to win a presidential election again. "A commitment to greater technology and digital resources in all areas referenced above is critical," the task force report notes. And according to a poll conducted by the group, GOP political operatives say data analytics and better digital outreach are among the top priorities for the party heading into the 2014 and 2016 elections.</p><p>But Republicans have one very big problem when it comes to recruiting the talent needed to modernize the party's digital infrastructure: its hostility towards gay people.</p><p>That's according to <a href="http://www.lizmair.com/biography.php">Liz Mair</a>, who was the RNC's online communications director in 2008 before leaving to start her own political consulting firm. Since then, she's worked with Carly Fiorina on her 2010 California Senate bid, with Rick Perry’s 2012 presidential campaign, and with Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s successful reelection effort after a recall attempt last year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voters see GOP as  “scary&#8221; and &#8220;narrow minded,&#8221; says RNC report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%e2%80%9cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%e2%80%9cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An "autopsy" report finds that Republicans have an image as “stuffy old men” ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://growthopp.gop.com/RNC_Growth_Opportunity_Book_2013.pdf">report</a> released by the Republican National Committee's Growth and Opportunity Project finds that most voters see the party as "out of touch" and "scary," and concludes that Republicans must focus on outreach to minorities.</p><p>The report, which analyzed the GOP's losses in the 2012 elections, said that many of those surveyed described the party as "narrow minded" and a party of "stuff old men."</p><p>"Young voters are increasingly rolling their eyes at what the Party represents, and many minorities wrongly think that Republicans do not like them or want them in the country," the report says. "When someone rolls their eyes at us, they are not likely to open their ears to us."</p><p>The report recommends that the GOP "stop talking to itself" and that "If we want ethnic minority voters to support Republicans, we have to engage them, and show our sincerity." On social issues, the RNC concludes that Republicans need to be more "inclusive and welcoming."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%e2%80%9cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%e2%80%9cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC chairman: Karl Rove&#8217;s attacks are &#8220;a fool&#8217;s game&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["These biologically stupid things that people say" are the problem, he said, not the GOP platform [UPDATED]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update - March 11, 8:33 a.m.:</strong> RNC spokesman Sean Spicer clarified to Salon that Preibus was not referring to Rove's effort, but rather that engaging in such an effort would be "a fool's game" for the RNC.</p><p><strong>From earlier:</strong></p><p>RNC Chairman Reince Priebus said that Karl Rove's plan to target far-right conservatives in the primaries, like potential Iowa Senate candidate Rep. Steve King, is "a fool's game because you can’t actually predict some of the things that go on.”</p><p>“Listen, I don’t think our platform is the issue,” Priebus said, <a href="http://www.radioiowa.com/2013/03/07/rnc-chair-says-roves-planned-attack-on-king-a-fools-game-audio/">Radio Iowa</a> reports. “I think a lot of times it’s some of these biologically stupid things that people say, you know, that I believe caused a lot of the problems.”</p><p>He continued: "Personally, as an RNC [Chair], I don’t believe in that. I don’t believe the party should pick winners and losers in primaries and I think it’s, historically, if you look at it, it’s a bit of a fool’s game because you can’t actually predict some of the things that go on.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP opens 2013 with money advantage over Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/gop_opens_2013_with_money_advantage_over_democrats_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/gop_opens_2013_with_money_advantage_over_democrats_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundraising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC raised $6.9 million in January, while the DNC only brought in $4.3 million]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican National Committee is starting 2013 with a financial advantage over its Democratic rivals.</p><p>The RNC raised $6.9 million in January and ended the month with $7.1 million in cash — along with no debt.</p><p>The Democratic National Committee brought in $4.3 million in January and ended the month with $4.7 million in cash.</p><p>But the DNC is carrying a large debt of $20.7 million, down slightly from the end of the year. Democrats racked up the debt while helping President Barack Obama hold onto the White House.</p><p>Party committees filed monthly financial reports Wednesday with the Federal Election Commission.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/gop_opens_2013_with_money_advantage_over_democrats_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/gop_opens_2013_with_money_advantage_over_democrats_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All policing, no protest around the inauguration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/all_policing_no_protest_around_the_inauguration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/all_policing_no_protest_around_the_inauguration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riot Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first ammendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13173230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new National Lawyers Guild report examines how policing at National Special Security Events silences dissent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent years I've regularly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/robocops_vs_the_occupiers/">noted</a> the unabashed militarization of protest policing. Building on a system of summit security established at the 2003 Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) meeting in Miami, the "Miami Model" of militarized, weaponized policing has crystallized into standard procedure for gatherings designated National Special Security Events (NSSE).</p><p>Ahead of the presidential inauguration in Washington Monday, an NSSE that will draw 3,000 law enforcement officers and some 13,000 military troops to the area, the National Lawyers Guild has <a href="https://docs.google.com/a/salon.com/gview?url=http://www.nlg.org/sites/default/files/NLG%2520Report%2520Developments%2520in%2520the%2520Policing%2520of%2520NSSEs%2520at%25202012%2520RNC%2520and%2520DNC.pdf&amp;chrome=true">released  a report </a>based on last year's Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla., and Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., highlighting First and Fourth Amendment violations imported with this sort of event policing. The report notes:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/all_policing_no_protest_around_the_inauguration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/all_policing_no_protest_around_the_inauguration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court continues order targeting voter intimidation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/court_continues_order_targeting_voter_intimidation_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/court_continues_order_targeting_voter_intimidation_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minorities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13170842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC failed to get the Court to end an order aimed at preventing intimidation of minority voters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has turned down an effort by the Republican National Committee to end a 30-year-old court order aimed at preventing intimidation of minority voters.</p><p>The justices did not comment Monday in rejecting an appeal of lower court decisions that left the order in place at least until 2017.</p><p>The order stems from a lawsuit filed by Democrats in New Jersey in 1981 that objected to a "ballot security" program the RNC ran in minority neighborhoods.</p><p>Republicans said the order hampers efforts to combat voter fraud, but U.S. District Judge Dickinson Debevoise said voter intimidation remains a threat and preventing it outweighs the potential danger of fraud.</p><p>The court action is unrelated to legal challenges to Republican-inspired voter identification laws in the 2012 campaign.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/court_continues_order_targeting_voter_intimidation_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/court_continues_order_targeting_voter_intimidation_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clint Eastwood&#8217;s new Romney ad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/clint_eastwoods_new_romney_ad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/clint_eastwoods_new_romney_ad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clint Eastwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commercial]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13050970</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans call upon Eastwood, even after his ridiculed speech to a chair at the RNC]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although actor Clint Eastwood's political involvement will forever be epitomized by his <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/30/clint_eastwood_steals_the_rnc/">speech to a chair</a> representing President Obama, Karl Rove's super PAC has called upon the Hollywood veteran to narrate a commercial that supports candidate Mitt Romney. (Of course, it's much harder to veer off track in a taped, scripted commercial.) The commercial will air in the swing states of Ohio, Iowa, Colorado, Florida, New Hampshire, Nevada and Virginia.</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/klXTb-s7d9A" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/clint_eastwoods_new_romney_ad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/24/clint_eastwoods_new_romney_ad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hot new Obama scandal has already been debunked &#8212; in 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/hot_new_obama_scandal_has_already_been_debunked_in_2008/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/hot_new_obama_scandal_has_already_been_debunked_in_2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Presidential Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13037144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Allegations that he was soliciting foreign money were debunked in 2008. But here we go again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you heard about the hot new Obama scandal? According to <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/10/09/fox-hypes-unsubstantiated-claim-that-obama-may/190469">Fox News</a>, <a href="http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/08/claim-obama-campaign-illegally-solicited-foreign-donors-via-social-media-website/">the Daily Caller</a>, <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/report-obama.com-solicits-foreign-contributions-for-prez/article/2510096">the Washington Examiner</a>, <a href="http://freebeacon.com/foreign-funds/">the Free Beacon</a>, <a href="http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2012/10/08/exposing_barack_obamas_illegal_foreign_campaign_money_loophole">Town Hall</a>, et al., the Obama campaign is soliciting donations from foreigners via its website in direct violation of U.S. election law. Donald Trump took this charge to its logical, birthery conclusion, tweeting a link to a story about the scandal along with the brilliant quip: "<a href="https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/256133095034601472">Foreign candidate getting foreign donations</a>."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/hot_new_obama_scandal_has_already_been_debunked_in_2008/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/11/hot_new_obama_scandal_has_already_been_debunked_in_2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYPD tactics at 2004 RNC ruled illegal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/nypd_tactics_at_2004_rnc_ruled_illegal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/nypd_tactics_at_2004_rnc_ruled_illegal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYPD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC 2004]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13027891</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A judge finds mass arrests unconstitutional, exposing the city to lawsuits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge ruled Monday that the arrest of hundreds of protesters at the 2004 Republican National Convention in New York were improper and unconstitutional. NYPD crowd control tactics were also ruled illegal.</p><p>In one incident ruled improper, over 200 antiwar and anti-capitalist demonstrators were kettled by police in lower Manhattan and mass arrested. The Wall Street Journal<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444004704578031050540111858.html?mod=WSJ_NY_MIDDLETopStories"> reported </a>on Monday's ruling relating to the police response:</p><blockquote><p>City attorneys argued that officers had "group probable cause" to make the arrests, meaning the crowd was acting as one. On Monday, U.S. District Court Judge Richard Sullivan in Manhattan rejected the city's theory and ruled the arrests on Fulton Street illegal.</p> <p>"Based on the undisputed facts, and particularly the video of the Fulton Street march and arrests, the court finds that there was not even arguable probable cause to make those arrests," the judge ruled.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/nypd_tactics_at_2004_rnc_ruled_illegal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/nypd_tactics_at_2004_rnc_ruled_illegal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservative operative&#8217;s sketchy past</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/a_history_of_the_gops_favorite_voter_registration_professional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/a_history_of_the_gops_favorite_voter_registration_professional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 21:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Sproul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13026924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This isn't the first time Nathan Sproul's efforts have come under scrutiny. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican Party is scrambling to cut ties from Strategic Allied Consulting, a consulting firm headed up by an infamous voter registration consultant Nathan Sproul. But, as Brad Friedman from Brad Blog has been <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/26/fla_voter_fraud_charge_has_ties_to_romney/">reporting</a>, Sproul and his firms have been consistently hired as consultants to Republicans despite their legal -- and ethical -- troubles. Here's a brief history:</p><p><strong>June 2004:</strong> Lincoln Strategies, a group headed by Nathan Sproul, attempted to siphon votes away from John Kerry by pushing to get Ralph Nader on the ballot, while also under the employ of the national Republican Party.</p><p><strong>October 2004:</strong> In Nevada and Oregon, former employees of the group Voters Outreach of America allege that they saw the company's staff members shredding registration forms from Democrats.  VOA, another Sproul-run group, was paid $500,000 by the Republican National Committee for voter outreach. In Nevada, one former employee said in a lawsuit that he was told to ask prospective voters, "Who would you vote for in the next election?" and then to only register those who said they would vote for Bush. The employee added that he believes his pay was also docked because he registered members of both parties. In Minnesota in the same year, VOA was accused of firing employees who brought back Democratic voter registration forms. Other employees in West Virginia and Pennsylvania made similar allegations.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/a_history_of_the_gops_favorite_voter_registration_professional/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/a_history_of_the_gops_favorite_voter_registration_professional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s ACORN moment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/gops_acorn_moment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/gops_acorn_moment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acorn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Republican consulting firm allegedly commits voter registration fraud. Where's the right-wing outrage this time?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are still plenty of conservatives who think ACORN stole the 2008 election for Obama and <a href="http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/will-this-devious-group-steal-your-vote/">will do it again this year</a>. ACORN was everywhere four years ago. Even John McCain, late in his campaign and desperate to land a blow on Obama, ran <a href="http://youtu.be/NZ9eelAl5tw">an ad</a> tying his challenger to the community-organizing group before saying in the final debate that ACORN "is now on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest frauds in voter history in this country, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6049529&amp;page=1">maybe destroying the fabric of democracy</a>.” How did ACORN steal the election? A number of the group’s paid canvassers had been caught submitting false voter registration forms in a handful of states, using the names of dead people or false addresses, in order to avoid working.</p><p>Four years later, ACORN is dead, and a Republican firm contracted by the Republican National Committee has adopted its shady tactics. But, so far at least, there’s been hardly a peep from the same conservatives who seized on ACORN about one of their own engaging in almost identical fraudulent tactics.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/gops_acorn_moment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/gops_acorn_moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Polling insights from &#8230;Twitter?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/polling_insights_from_twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/polling_insights_from_twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2012 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13011992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter analysis may be a new way to study public opinion]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the conventions, headlines like "Michelle Obama's speech tweeted nearly twice as much as Romney's," "Romney drops over 100K on Twitter," and "Kal Penn makes <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/07/re_live_the_dnc_through_animated_gifs/">#sexyface</a> go viral" were as much of a story as many of the speakers. Now a <a href="http://www.engagedc.com/2012/09/13/can-tweets-predict-polls-here%E2%80%99s-what-we-learned-from-the-conventions/">digital agency</a> based out of Washington, D.C., thinks Twitter could serve as a real-time gauge of public opinion.</p><p>The organization, Engage, compared Twitter data (via <a href="http://topsy.com/tweets">Topsy</a>) against polling data from Gallup, Rasmussen and Reuters-Ipsos from the DNC and RNC to determine if real-time tweets at all correlated with polls. The study isn't perfect -- for example, Engage assumed that the daily polls fluctuate based solely on the performance of the speakers, and that words like “awesome" and “wow" in tweets signal interest in speakers -- but for the most part, the study showed that tweets matched up with the polls:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/polling_insights_from_twitter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/14/polling_insights_from_twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/must_see_morning_clip_26/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/must_see_morning_clip_26/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2012 13:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Daily Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13006706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Stewart on Fox News's convention coverage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Daily Show wrapped up the DNC coverage by analyzing (mocking) Fox News's reporting at the DNC. One segment featured a montage of clips of Fox News attacking the DNC for not talking about God--to which Stewart  retorts, "Fox is truly doing God's work--well, God's busy work. The kind of he doesn't need done, cause he's <em>God</em>."</p><p>Watch the rest of the clip here:</p><table style="font: 11px arial; color: #333; background-color: #f5f5f5;" width="400" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tbody> <tr style="background-color: #e5e5e5;" valign="middle"> <td style="padding: 2px 1px 0px 5px;"><a style="color: #333; text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.thedailyshow.com" target="_blank">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></td> <td style="padding: 2px 5px 0px 5px; text-align: right; font-weight: bold;">Mon - Thurs 11p / 10c</td> </tr> <tr style="height: 14px;" valign="middle"> <td style="padding: 2px 1px 0px 5px;" colspan="2"><a style="color: #333; text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/fri-september-7-2012/hope-and-change-2---last-week-this-week" target="_blank">Hope and Change 2 - Last Week This Week</a></td> </tr> <tr style="height: 14px; background-color: #353535;" valign="middle"> <td style="padding: 2px 5px 0px 5px; width: 512px; overflow: hidden; text-align: right;" colspan="2"><a style="color: #96deff; text-decoration: none; font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/" target="_blank">www.thedailyshow.com</a></td> </tr> <tr valign="middle"> <td style="padding: 0px;" colspan="2"><object style="display: block;" width="400" height="288" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="src" value="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:418906" /><param name="wmode" value="window" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><param name="flashvars" value="autoPlay=false" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="allownetworking" value="all" /><embed style="display: block;" width="512" height="288" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:418906" wmode="window" allowfullscreen="true" flashvars="autoPlay=false" allowscriptaccess="always" allownetworking="all" /></object></td> </tr> <tr style="height: 18px;" valign="middle"> <td style="padding: 0px;" colspan="2"> <table style="margin: 0px; text-align: center;" width="100%" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0"> <tbody> <tr valign="middle"> <td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;"><a style="font: 10px arial; color: #333; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/" target="_blank">Daily Show Full Episodes</a></td> <td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;"><a style="font: 10px arial; color: #333; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/" target="_blank">Political Humor &amp; Satire Blog</a></td> <td style="padding: 3px; width: 33%;"><a style="font: 10px arial; color: #333; text-decoration: none;" href="http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow" target="_blank">The Daily Show on Facebook</a></td> </tr> </tbody> </table> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/must_see_morning_clip_26/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/10/must_see_morning_clip_26/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>