<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > RNC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/rnc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RNC Chair: GOP has been &#8220;lousy&#8221; at outreach to Latinos</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/rnc_chair_gop_has_been_lousy_at_outreach_to_latinos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/rnc_chair_gop_has_been_lousy_at_outreach_to_latinos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 14:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13346552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["But that’s going to change," promised Reince Priebus ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RNC Chair Reince Priebus acknowledged that Republicans have been "lousy" at reaching out to Latino voters, telling a group of Latino elected officials that that's "going to change."</p><p>“I’ll be honest here. In the past two years, we’ve done a pretty lousy job of connecting in the Latino community," Priebus said, speaking at an event in Chicago for the National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials, the <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/politics/clout/chi-rnc-chairman-priebus-says-gop-does-lousy-job-reaching-out-to-latinos-20130629,0,6858340.story">Chicago Tribune</a> reports. "We’ve missed out on opportunities to build better relationships. But that’s going to change."</p><p>“I didn’t come here to convert you,” he added. “I hope that it’s clear that we want to earn your trust and your vote.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/rnc_chair_gop_has_been_lousy_at_outreach_to_latinos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/30/rnc_chair_gop_has_been_lousy_at_outreach_to_latinos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>College Republicans&#8217; plan for GOP rebranding: Seem tolerant!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/college_republicans_help_out_with_gop_rebanding_effort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/college_republicans_help_out_with_gop_rebanding_effort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13315475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The branch of the conservative movement that bred the party's scummiest strategists urges a softer sell]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today, the College Republican National Committee is releasing a report, based on a poll and focus groups, examining how and why the Republican Party lost the under-30 vote and what they could do to win it back. Spoiler: They will have to become an entirely different party with entirely different positions. Though that is sort of my interpretation of their findings. The College Republicans are still pretty sure it's primarily a problem of "messaging."</p><p>The report, <a href="http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=47D81FDF-F698-468B-A4B4-004B8005129B">according to Politico's summary</a>, covers much of the same ground as the Reince Priebus-ordered RNC report on the troubles of the Republican Party released earlier this year. Politico sums up the findings with the following bullet points:</p><blockquote><p><strong>Gay marriage:</strong> “On the ‘open-minded’ issue … [w]e will face serious difficulty so long as the issue of gay marriage remains on the table.”</p> <p><strong>Hispanics:</strong> “Latino voters … tend to think the GOP couldn’t care less about them.”</p> <p><strong>Perception of the party’s economic stance:</strong> “We’ve become the party that will pat you on your back when you make it, but won’t offer you a hand to help you get there.”</p> <p><strong>Big reason for the image problem:</strong> The “outrageous statements made by errant Republican voices.”</p> <p><strong>Words that up-for-grabs voters associate with the GOP:</strong> “The responses were brutal: closed-minded, racist, rigid, old-fashioned.”</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/college_republicans_help_out_with_gop_rebanding_effort/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/03/college_republicans_help_out_with_gop_rebanding_effort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh: No one willing to impeach the first black president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush announced on Monday that Obama is not in "any jeopardy" of impeachment -- but only because he is black ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh announced on Monday that President Obama won't be <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/impeach_obama_again/" target="_blank">impeached</a> over recent controversies and that "Benghazi is not going to touch" him. And no, it's not because the talking points "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/two_scandals_deflated_one_persists/" target="_blank">scandal</a>" wasn't really, you know, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/two_scandals_deflated_one_persists/" target="_blank">scandalous</a>, or that the Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus told impeachment-happy members of Congress to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/" target="_blank">cool it until they have evidence</a> to support their claims or any other reasons that are based in reality.</p><p>It's because Obama is black, and "the American people are not going to tolerate the first black president being removed from office," according to Limbaugh.</p><p><iframe src="http://mediamatters.org/embed/194156" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="480" height="360"></iframe></p><p>h/t <a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/05/20/limbaugh-obama-wont-be-removed-from-office-beca/194156" target="_blank">Media Matters</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC Chair: Don&#8217;t call for impeachment without evidence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 May 2013 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13301729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reince Priebus chided members of the Republican party who have called for Obama's impeachment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RNC Chair Reince Priebus warned members of the Republican party to be cautious when calling for President Obama's impeachment over the Benghazi and IRS scandals, "until you have evidence."</p><p>“We have to be persistent but patient,” Priebus told <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/05/behind-the-curtain-why-the-gop-thinks-it-could-blow-it-91528.html?hp=t1">Politico</a>. “I think where there’s smoke, there’s fire. If we present ourselves to the American people as intelligent, we’re going to be in a great place as far as showing that this administration is not transparent, is obsessed with power and hates dissent. But you don’t call for impeachment until you have evidence.”</p><p>Republicans like Sen. Jim Inhofe, Okla., and Rep. Jason Chaffetz, Utah, have <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/house_goper_obama_could_be_impeached_over_benghazi/">argued</a> that the President could be impeached over the State Department's handling of the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Libya — not to mention the slew of Republicans who have <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/please_stop_comparing_things_to_watergate/">invoked</a> Watergate when discussing the IRS scandal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why I quit the Republican Party</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/why_i_quit_the_republican_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/why_i_quit_the_republican_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Latino vote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[veterans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Puerto Rico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once called the future of the GOP, Latino outreach director Pablo Pantoja tells Salon how intolerance made him bolt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A year ago, Pablo Pantoja was the future of the Republican Party, courting fellow Latinos for the conservative cause and stumping across Florida <a href="http://www.sunshinestatesarah.com/2012/01/how-this-right-wing-nut-came-to-vote.html">with Ann Romney’s brother</a>. "Hispanics in the area are going to realize the Republican Party is where they belong,” the <a href="http://pablopantoja.com">Puerto Rico-born Iraq vet</a> told the New York Times <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/28/us/politics/floridas-crucial-hispanic-voters-are-wary-of-romney.html">in April 2012</a>, just a week after being named the Republican National Committee’s Latino outreach director in the electorally all-important Sunshine State. "We are going to engage Hispanics and Latinos like we've never done before," Reince Priebus had told reporters that month <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/04/16/gop_targets_hispanic_voters_in_swing_states.html">in a conference call</a> introducing Pantoja and his counterparts in five other battleground states. (On Election Night, Mitt Romney lost all of those states except for one, North Carolina.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/why_i_quit_the_republican_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/why_i_quit_the_republican_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC&#8217;s Florida head of Latino outreach flips parties over &#8220;culture of intolerance&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/rncs_florida_head_of_latino_outreach_flips_parties_over_culture_of_intolerance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/rncs_florida_head_of_latino_outreach_flips_parties_over_culture_of_intolerance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 13:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage Foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latinos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pablo Pantoja]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also citing the Heritage Foundation study, Pablo Pantoja announced that he is now a Democrat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pablo Pantoja, RNC State Director Of Florida Outreach, announced that he is now a Democrat, citing a controversial Heritage Foundation study on immigration and the overall "culture of intolerance" within the Republican party.</p><p>"It doesn’t take much to see the culture of intolerance surrounding the Republican Party today," Pantoja wrote in a letter to the <a href="http://thefloridanation.com/?p=555">Florida Nation</a>. "I have wondered before about the seemingly harsh undertones about immigrants and others. Look no further; a well-known organization recently confirms the intolerance of that which seems different or strange to them."</p><p>Pantoja was referencing the recent Heritage Foundation <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/09/how_heritage_jettisoned_the_think_in_think_tank/">study</a> on Congress' immigration reform legislation, which was written by Jason Richwine, who also once wrote: "No one knows whether Hispanics will ever reach IQ parity with whites, but the prediction that new Hispanic immigrants will have low-IQ children and grandchildren is difficult to argue against."</p><p>"Studies geared towards making – human beings – viewed as less because of their immigrant status to outright unacceptable claims, are at the center of the immigration debate," Pantoja wrote.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/rncs_florida_head_of_latino_outreach_flips_parties_over_culture_of_intolerance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/rncs_florida_head_of_latino_outreach_flips_parties_over_culture_of_intolerance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC asks SCOTUS to strike down contribution limits</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/rnc_asks_scotus_to_strike_down_contribution_limits/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/rnc_asks_scotus_to_strike_down_contribution_limits/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Super PACs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292724</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican National Committee argued that certain limits on campaign contributions violate the First Amendment]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Republican National Committee filed a brief asking the Supreme Court to strike down certain limits on campaign contributions, because they violate the First Amendment.</p><p><a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/fundraising/298307-rnc-urges-supreme-court-to-strike-campaign-finance-limits">The Hill</a> reports that the RNC is challenging how much an individual can donate in the course of a two-year election cycle:</p><blockquote><p>Individual donors cannot donate more than $74,600 to political committees, such as the RNC, in a two-year period. Contributions to individual candidates are capped at $48,600, meaning one donor could only give the maximum donation to nine candidates per cycle.</p> <p>The RNC said in its brief that the court should strike down aggregate limits because they infringe on donors' First Amendment rights but don't serve an appropriate and “narrowly tailored” government interest.</p></blockquote><p>The Court is scheduled to take up campaign finance limits in its next term, which starts in October.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/rnc_asks_scotus_to_strike_down_contribution_limits/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/rnc_asks_scotus_to_strike_down_contribution_limits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the Christian right flee the GOP?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/will_social_conservatives_flee_gop_form_3rd_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/will_social_conservatives_flee_gop_form_3rd_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13267986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican civil war heats up as social conservatives feel abandoned and threaten to form a third party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will social conservatives really make good on their threats, and form their own political party? With the course of history and their own political allies leaving them in the dust, the group is facing an existential crisis that has left them at the nadir of their power with no obvious path to recovery -- and now they're getting desperate.</p><p>Inside the conservative movement, the Tea Party has displaced evangelical activists as the dynamic force, pushing economic issues ahead of social ones, while voters affirmed their support for gay rights and punished candidates with restrictionist views on abortion in 2012. In their "autopsy report," the Republican National Committee essentially suggested abandoning social conservatives -- despite leaning on them heavily just a few years ago to elect and reelect George W. Bush -- and even the movement conservatives at CPAC had <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/chrisgeidner/at-cpac-the-marriage-fight-is-over">little appetite</a> for the Christian-right causes of yore.</p><p>Needless to say, social conservatives who are not happy about this state of affairs are lashing out against their friends, threatening to leave the GOP if it doesn't join them on the wrong side of history.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/will_social_conservatives_flee_gop_form_3rd_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/will_social_conservatives_flee_gop_form_3rd_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lady Gaga reportedly turned down $1 million offer to perform at RNC</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/lady_gaga_reportedly_turned_down_1_million_offer_to_perform_at_rnc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/lady_gaga_reportedly_turned_down_1_million_offer_to_perform_at_rnc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2013 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13258272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A report from the Examiner alleges that the GOP was interested in Pitbull and Dolly Parton, too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://washingtonexaminer.com/lady-gaga-turned-down-1-million-to-perform-at-rnc/article/2525899">Washington Examiner</a> reports that the GOP, a party whose stance towards gays <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/">has been nothing if not fraught</a>, approached <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/lady-gaga-gay-rights">LGBTQ icon</a> Lady Gaga to perform at the Republican National Convention's Hispanic Leadership Network last August. Sourcing a lawsuit filed by GOP fundraiser American Action Network against production company Cater America LLC, the Examinar claims that Gaga was offered $1 million to perform. Dolly Parton and Pitbull were approached as well.</p><p>AAN's Pete Meachum told the Examiner that Cater America head Rob Jennings said, "See what it would take to get Gaga instead of Dolly."</p><p>From the Examiner:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/lady_gaga_reportedly_turned_down_1_million_offer_to_perform_at_rnc/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/01/lady_gaga_reportedly_turned_down_1_million_offer_to_perform_at_rnc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strategist in RNC reboot calls Obama a &#8220;socialist&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/strategist_in_rnc_reboot_calls_obama_a_socialist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/strategist_in_rnc_reboot_calls_obama_a_socialist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Haley Barbour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mississippi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Socialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Barbour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Henry Barbour, the nephew of former governor Haley Barbour, was an author of the RNC's plan to reshape the party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry Barbour, the nephew of the former governor of Mississippi and an author of the RNC's plan to reboot the party and broaden its appeal, thinks President Obama is a "socialist."</p><p>"We all want to make America strong economically and militarily and every other way but you can't do that if you're not in office," he told <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/presidential-races/288845-leader-in-gops-reboot-calls-obama-a-socialist">The Hill</a>. "We've got a socialist in office right now — how's that working for us?"</p><p>When pressed on his choice of words, Barbour said: "I don't care. I mean, look, I think he's a socialist. I'm not saying he doesn't love our country," he said. "No, I don't care."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/strategist_in_rnc_reboot_calls_obama_a_socialist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/strategist_in_rnc_reboot_calls_obama_a_socialist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social conservatives slam RNC for supporting Rob Portman</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/social_conservatives_slam_rnc_for_supporting_rob_portman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/social_conservatives_slam_rnc_for_supporting_rob_portman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Portman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phyllis Schlafly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ralph Reed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13245420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC shouldn't be "pandering idiots," they said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social conservatives told the RNC not to be "pandering idiots," after Chairman Reince Priebus stood by Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, who over the weekend came out in support of same-sex marriage.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/343311/social-conservatives-rnc-don-t-be-pandering-idiots-betsy-woodruff">National Review Online</a>:</p><blockquote><p>“I think [the RNC] should pretty much ignore him,” says Phyllis Schlafly, a longtime conservative activist, in an interview with National Review Online. “I think he has made a mistake, and he probably won’t get reelected.”</p> <p>Ralph Reed, the founder of the Faith and Freedom Coalition, says the party has to be careful. “If the Republican party tries to retreat from being a pro-marriage, pro-family party, the big tent is going to become a pup tent very fast,” he says. “I am concerned that some in the party are going wobbly on this issue.”</p></blockquote><p>Brian Brown, of the National Organization for Marriage, told NRO that Portman will now likely get a challenger in the primary. “This is a critical issue, and to act like it’s just no big deal is just wrong."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/social_conservatives_slam_rnc_for_supporting_rob_portman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/19/social_conservatives_slam_rnc_for_supporting_rob_portman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Have Republicans read their new rebranding report?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/have_republicans_read_their_new_rebranding_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/have_republicans_read_their_new_rebranding_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Perez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hispanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hours into its new outreach effort to minorities, the party is already trashing Obama's new Latino labor secretary]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How serious are Republicans about their effort to reach out to minorities, one of the core doctrines of their big new <a href="http://www.documentcloud.org/documents/623752-rnc-report-growth-opportunity-book-2013.html#document/p2">Growth and Opportunity Project</a> report they released this morning? We may find out pretty quickly with a series of tests that will demonstrate whether Republican elites at the Republican National Committee can control the more unsavory elements in the base.</p><p>The report says "we have to engage" minority voters "and show our sincerity.” A first test of that strategy approached them almost instantly, with President Obama’s nomination today of Tom Perez to serve as labor secretary. And so far, they don't seem to be implementing it very deftly.</p><p>Perez, who is currently the head of the Department of Justice’ Civil Rights Division, has had his name dragged through the mud over factually inaccurate, race-baiting charges of impropriety. Some conservatives claim that Perez, a Latino working under the first black president and first black attorney general in history, dismissed a case against a handful of New Black Panther activists in some kind gesture of racial solidarity.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/have_republicans_read_their_new_rebranding_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/have_republicans_read_their_new_rebranding_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC chairman asked about CPAC&#8217;s failed racism panel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC launched a new initiative for minority outreach, shortly after CPAC's ill-fated panel on race]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In announcing the Republican National Committee's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%E2%80%9Cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/">plans for minority outreach</a>, Chairman Reince Priebus was asked about CPAC's panel on race that went terribly awry, and how Republicans plan to address members of the base who still hold those kinds of views of minorities.</p><p>"Question about CPAC last week, where a panel on African-American voters dissolved into a shouting match with at least one activist saying that -- talking about voters being systematically disenfranchised. How, given that sort of backdrop in the party, do you plan to overcome those challenges in your role at the RNC?" said National Press Club president Angela Greiling Keane, reading from a written question, during a press conference with Priebus at the National Press Club.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/rnc_chair_asked_about_cpacs_failed_racism_panel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh slams RNC rebrand plan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/limbaugh_slams_rnc_rebrand_plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/limbaugh_slams_rnc_rebrand_plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limabaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The radio host says the GOP is getting "bamboozled" -- and that real problem is they're not conservative enough]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh is not a fan of <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%E2%80%9Cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/">the new report</a> released this morning by the Republican National Committee about what the party needs to do to rebrand itself, saying the RNC completely misunderstood the lessons of the 2012 election.</p><p>"The Republicans are just getting totally bamboozled right now. And they are entirely lacking in confidence. Which is what happens to every political party after an election in which they think they got shellacked," the influential conservative radio host told his listeners this morning. "They think they got landslided, but they didn't."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/limbaugh_slams_rnc_rebrand_plan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/limbaugh_slams_rnc_rebrand_plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP expert: Anti-gay views hurting party&#8217;s tech recruitment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Civil War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[RNC's former digital strategist says her party's anti-gay views are hurting its recruitment of vital tech talent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In its massive <a href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/130960510/Growth-Opportunity-Project">autopsy report</a> released Monday, the Republican National Committee says the party needs to get a lot better at technology if it ever hopes to win a presidential election again. "A commitment to greater technology and digital resources in all areas referenced above is critical," the task force report notes. And according to a poll conducted by the group, GOP political operatives say data analytics and better digital outreach are among the top priorities for the party heading into the 2014 and 2016 elections.</p><p>But Republicans have one very big problem when it comes to recruiting the talent needed to modernize the party's digital infrastructure: its hostility towards gay people.</p><p>That's according to <a href="http://www.lizmair.com/biography.php">Liz Mair</a>, who was the RNC's online communications director in 2008 before leaving to start her own political consulting firm. Since then, she's worked with Carly Fiorina on her 2010 California Senate bid, with Rick Perry’s 2012 presidential campaign, and with Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s successful reelection effort after a recall attempt last year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/why_the_rnc_may_have_a_problem_implementing_its_technology_goals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voters see GOP as  “scary&#8221; and &#8220;narrow minded,&#8221; says RNC report</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%e2%80%9cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%e2%80%9cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An "autopsy" report finds that Republicans have an image as “stuffy old men” ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://growthopp.gop.com/RNC_Growth_Opportunity_Book_2013.pdf">report</a> released by the Republican National Committee's Growth and Opportunity Project finds that most voters see the party as "out of touch" and "scary," and concludes that Republicans must focus on outreach to minorities.</p><p>The report, which analyzed the GOP's losses in the 2012 elections, said that many of those surveyed described the party as "narrow minded" and a party of "stuff old men."</p><p>"Young voters are increasingly rolling their eyes at what the Party represents, and many minorities wrongly think that Republicans do not like them or want them in the country," the report says. "When someone rolls their eyes at us, they are not likely to open their ears to us."</p><p>The report recommends that the GOP "stop talking to itself" and that "If we want ethnic minority voters to support Republicans, we have to engage them, and show our sincerity." On social issues, the RNC concludes that Republicans need to be more "inclusive and welcoming."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%e2%80%9cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/voters_see_gop_as_%e2%80%9cscary_and_narrow_minded_says_rnc_report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RNC chairman: Karl Rove&#8217;s attacks are &#8220;a fool&#8217;s game&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2014 elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["These biologically stupid things that people say" are the problem, he said, not the GOP platform [UPDATED]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update - March 11, 8:33 a.m.:</strong> RNC spokesman Sean Spicer clarified to Salon that Preibus was not referring to Rove's effort, but rather that engaging in such an effort would be "a fool's game" for the RNC.</p><p><strong>From earlier:</strong></p><p>RNC Chairman Reince Priebus said that Karl Rove's plan to target far-right conservatives in the primaries, like potential Iowa Senate candidate Rep. Steve King, is "a fool's game because you can’t actually predict some of the things that go on.”</p><p>“Listen, I don’t think our platform is the issue,” Priebus said, <a href="http://www.radioiowa.com/2013/03/07/rnc-chair-says-roves-planned-attack-on-king-a-fools-game-audio/">Radio Iowa</a> reports. “I think a lot of times it’s some of these biologically stupid things that people say, you know, that I believe caused a lot of the problems.”</p><p>He continued: "Personally, as an RNC [Chair], I don’t believe in that. I don’t believe the party should pick winners and losers in primaries and I think it’s, historically, if you look at it, it’s a bit of a fool’s game because you can’t actually predict some of the things that go on.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/rnc_chair_karl_roves_attacks_are_a_fools_game/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP opens 2013 with money advantage over Democrats</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/gop_opens_2013_with_money_advantage_over_democrats_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/gop_opens_2013_with_money_advantage_over_democrats_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fundraising]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC raised $6.9 million in January, while the DNC only brought in $4.3 million]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Republican National Committee is starting 2013 with a financial advantage over its Democratic rivals.</p><p>The RNC raised $6.9 million in January and ended the month with $7.1 million in cash — along with no debt.</p><p>The Democratic National Committee brought in $4.3 million in January and ended the month with $4.7 million in cash.</p><p>But the DNC is carrying a large debt of $20.7 million, down slightly from the end of the year. Democrats racked up the debt while helping President Barack Obama hold onto the White House.</p><p>Party committees filed monthly financial reports Wednesday with the Federal Election Commission.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/gop_opens_2013_with_money_advantage_over_democrats_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/gop_opens_2013_with_money_advantage_over_democrats_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>All policing, no protest around the inauguration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/all_policing_no_protest_around_the_inauguration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/all_policing_no_protest_around_the_inauguration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inauguration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Riot Police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSSE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first ammendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13173230</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new National Lawyers Guild report examines how policing at National Special Security Events silences dissent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent years I've regularly <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/robocops_vs_the_occupiers/">noted</a> the unabashed militarization of protest policing. Building on a system of summit security established at the 2003 Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) meeting in Miami, the "Miami Model" of militarized, weaponized policing has crystallized into standard procedure for gatherings designated National Special Security Events (NSSE).</p><p>Ahead of the presidential inauguration in Washington Monday, an NSSE that will draw 3,000 law enforcement officers and some 13,000 military troops to the area, the National Lawyers Guild has <a href="https://docs.google.com/a/salon.com/gview?url=http://www.nlg.org/sites/default/files/NLG%2520Report%2520Developments%2520in%2520the%2520Policing%2520of%2520NSSEs%2520at%25202012%2520RNC%2520and%2520DNC.pdf&amp;chrome=true">released  a report </a>based on last year's Republican National Convention in Tampa, Fla., and Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., highlighting First and Fourth Amendment violations imported with this sort of event policing. The report notes:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/all_policing_no_protest_around_the_inauguration/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/16/all_policing_no_protest_around_the_inauguration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Court continues order targeting voter intimidation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/court_continues_order_targeting_voter_intimidation_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/court_continues_order_targeting_voter_intimidation_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 19:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minorities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13170842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The RNC failed to get the Court to end an order aimed at preventing intimidation of minority voters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has turned down an effort by the Republican National Committee to end a 30-year-old court order aimed at preventing intimidation of minority voters.</p><p>The justices did not comment Monday in rejecting an appeal of lower court decisions that left the order in place at least until 2017.</p><p>The order stems from a lawsuit filed by Democrats in New Jersey in 1981 that objected to a "ballot security" program the RNC ran in minority neighborhoods.</p><p>Republicans said the order hampers efforts to combat voter fraud, but U.S. District Judge Dickinson Debevoise said voter intimidation remains a threat and preventing it outweighs the potential danger of fraud.</p><p>The court action is unrelated to legal challenges to Republican-inspired voter identification laws in the 2012 campaign.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/court_continues_order_targeting_voter_intimidation_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/14/court_continues_order_targeting_voter_intimidation_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>