<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Roger Ebert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/roger_ebert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 23:46:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Tilda Swinton leads dance-along to Barry White at Ebertfest 2013</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/tilda_swinton_leads_dance_along_to_barry_white_at_ebertfest_2013/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/tilda_swinton_leads_dance_along_to_barry_white_at_ebertfest_2013/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 13:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tilda Swinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barry white]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebertfest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dancing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The actress energizes a crowd of 1,500 by grooving to "You're the First, the Last, My Everything"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://newsfeed.time.com/2013/03/25/tilda-swinton-slept-in-a-glass-box-at-the-museum-of-modern-art/">Tilda Swinton</a> left her box at the MoMa to lead a Barry White dance-along at Roger Ebert's Film Festival on April 20, and the result is pure happiness:</p><p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/64683468?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe> <p><a href="http://vimeo.com/64683468">Ebertfest 2013 Dance Along</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/user17148437">Ebertfest</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/tilda_swinton_leads_dance_along_to_barry_white_at_ebertfest_2013/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/tilda_swinton_leads_dance_along_to_barry_white_at_ebertfest_2013/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pick of the week: Terrence Malick&#8217;s rapturous, religious love story</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/pick_of_the_week_terrence_malicks_rapturous_religious_love_story/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/pick_of_the_week_terrence_malicks_rapturous_religious_love_story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 23:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[To the Wonder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrence Malick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olga Kurylenko]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rachel McAdams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13268331</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pick of the week: Ignore the haters! Terrence Malick's tragic, erotic "To the Wonder" casts a powerful spell]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/terrence_malick">Terrence Malick</a> has followed the six-year creative struggle of his universe-spanning, would-be masterpiece <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_tree_of_life">“The Tree of Life”</a> with a period of unprecedented, unexpected and indeed unexplained productivity. For whatever set of reasons, the famously reclusive director who had made five feature films in the previous 38 years has apparently completed four more since 2011. The first of these to reach the public is an abstract and perhaps allegorical story of love and heartbreak called <a href="http://www.magpictures.com/tothewonder/">“To the Wonder,”</a> and even in beginning to speak about it I run the risk of leading you down the wrong path. <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/ben_affleck">Ben Affleck</a> and Olga Kurylenko are in the movie, as a man and woman who meet in Paris, fall in love and move to America, and then drift apart, for reasons we (and they) only partly understand.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/pick_of_the_week_terrence_malicks_rapturous_religious_love_story/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/11/pick_of_the_week_terrence_malicks_rapturous_religious_love_story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Someone hates Roger Ebert: Westboro Baptist</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/someone_hates_roger_ebert_westboro_baptist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/someone_hates_roger_ebert_westboro_baptist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 15:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264560</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The critic's tweets about a Salon story just before his death infuriate the hate group -- and inspire its pickets]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should come as absolutely no surprise that the attention-whore hate group Westboro Baptist Church announced this weekend <a href="http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/westboro-baptist-church-picket-roger-434594">it would protest the funeral of Roger Ebert</a>. Ebert, after all, stood for everything WBC will never possess – tolerance, exuberance, rational thought. What is surprising is how blatantly retaliatory this particular protest is – and how it appears to have been prompted by a Salon story.</p><p>Twice on March 25, Ebert tweeted a link to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/my_day_at_westboro_baptist_yes_jesus_hates_you/ ">a Salon excerpt from Jeff Chu's new memoir</a>, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0062049739/?tag=saloncom08-20">"Does Jesus Really Love Me?"</a> In it, Chu, a gay man, goes undercover in the Topeka, Kan.- based "church," where he spends a day picketing with the group who believes that "Spreading their gospel is their duty and their gesture of kindness to a hell-bound world." It just happens that their method of spreading the love involves screaming, "I don’t even know what’s growing inside your crusty assholes!" at gay men.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/someone_hates_roger_ebert_westboro_baptist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/someone_hates_roger_ebert_westboro_baptist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Westboro Baptist Church to protest at Roger Ebert&#8217;s funeral</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/westboro_baptist_church_to_protest_at_roger_eberts_funeral/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/westboro_baptist_church_to_protest_at_roger_eberts_funeral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[funeral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film critic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Westboro Baptist Church]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13264592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The homophobic group took issue with a tweet that the film critic wrote in March]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Westboro Baptist Church, which has been petitioned to be classified as a hate group, plans to picket the funeral of legendary film critic Roger Ebert on Monday morning.</p><p>Westboro took issue with the Pulitzer Prize-winning film critic, who died on Thursday, after he <a href="https://twitter.com/ebertchicago/status/316210590316130304">tweeted</a> out a link to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/my_day_at_westboro_baptist_yes_jesus_hates_you/">an excerpt from Jeff Chu's book</a> "Does Jesus Really Love Me?" on Salon, in which Chu, a gay man, goes undercover to spend four days in Kansas studying the homophobic group. Ebert <a href="https://twitter.com/ebertchicago/status/316195581355753473">tweeted two links</a>, saying in one of them, "Just another day at Westboro Baptist."</p><p>Westboro's protest will begin at 9:15 a.m. From the <a href="http://www.godhatesfags.com/fliers/20130406_RogerEbert_4-08.pdf">press release</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/westboro_baptist_church_to_protest_at_roger_eberts_funeral/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/westboro_baptist_church_to_protest_at_roger_eberts_funeral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chaz Ebert on husband Roger&#8217;s death: &#8220;I&#8217;ve lost the love of my life&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/chaz_ebert_on_husband_rogers_death_ive_lost_the_love_of_my_life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/chaz_ebert_on_husband_rogers_death_ive_lost_the_love_of_my_life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["And the world has lost a visionary and a creative and generous spirit," she added ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chaz Ebert, television producer and widow of legendary film critic Roger Ebert, released a <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20688468,00.html" target="_blank">statement</a> on Thursday addressing the loss of her husband and their life together. It is really, really lovely.</p><p>In it, Ebert mourned the loss of "my husband, my friend, my confidant and oh-so-brilliant partner," <a href="http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20688468,00.html" target="_blank">adding</a>:</p><blockquote><p>He fought a courageous fight. I've lost the love of my life and the world has lost a visionary and a creative and generous spirit who touched so many people all over the world. We had a lovely, lovely life together, more beautiful and epic than a movie. It had its highs and the lows, but was always experienced with good humor, grace and a deep abiding love for each other.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/chaz_ebert_on_husband_rogers_death_ive_lost_the_love_of_my_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/chaz_ebert_on_husband_rogers_death_ive_lost_the_love_of_my_life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert was the original fanboy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/roger_ebert_was_the_original_fanboy_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/roger_ebert_was_the_original_fanboy_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 16:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the daily dot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geeks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fandom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science-fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fanboys]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ebert wasn't just a venerated film critic: He was also a sci-fi lover, supergeek and passionate advocate of fandom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.dailydot.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/dailydot_square-e1364842032669.png" alt="The Daily Dot" align="left" /></a> It's no secret that Roger Ebert was a fan of movies. He loved movies passionately and sometimes despite themselves—like when he gave <em>Speed 2: Cruise Control, </em>a movie with a 2% <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/speed_2_cruise_control/">tomato meter</a> rating, a <a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19970627/REVIEWS/706270305/1023">three star review</a> because of its passionate commitment to "goofiness."</p><p>But what most people don't know is that he was also in fandom. Ebert began his career as a teenager in sci-fi fandom, writing passionate letters to fanzines and eventually writing for the fanzines himself.</p><p>But he didn't just write. In <a href="http://www.asimovs.com/_issue_0501/thoughtexperiments.shtml">a missive for sci-fi magazine <em>Asimov's</em></a>, published in 2004, Ebert recalls how "Fandom was a secret society and I had admission to friends everywhere who spoke the same arcane language."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/roger_ebert_was_the_original_fanboy_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/roger_ebert_was_the_original_fanboy_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RIP Roger Ebert: Movie criticism&#8217;s Great Communicator</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/rip_roger_ebert_movie_criticisms_great_communicator/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/rip_roger_ebert_movie_criticisms_great_communicator/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 01:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.I.P]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obituaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obituary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film criticism movie criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262246</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From his TV stardom to his second career as Twitter pioneer, he was the most beloved and generous of all critics]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/roger_ebert">Roger Ebert,</a> who died on Thursday at age 70 after a long and debilitating struggle with cancer that never sapped his spirit, was the Great Communicator of movie criticism, a genuine and generous man who became the greatest popular advocate the form has ever had. He reached millions of readers with his straightforward prose, and a vastly larger universe of TV viewers in the ‘80s and ‘90s with his gruff but avuncular presence. Even if you’re too young to have grown up watching Ebert spar on the small screen with his late friend and rival Gene Siskel, you still know who he is. Virtually alone among his generation of journalists, Ebert saw the substantive potential of social media early on and translated his fame in print and on TV to the Internet, becoming a Twitter trailblazer and a mentor who showed the rest of us in this imploding profession not just how to survive but how to prosper in the digital age.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/rip_roger_ebert_movie_criticisms_great_communicator/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/rip_roger_ebert_movie_criticisms_great_communicator/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Film critic Roger Ebert dies at 70</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/film_critic_roger_ebert_dies_at_70/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/film_critic_roger_ebert_dies_at_70/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Sun-Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film critic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obituary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13261905</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nation's leading movie reviewer had been battling cancer for ten years]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chicago Sun-Times <a href="https://twitter.com/Suntimes/status/319894506931617793">is reporting</a> that legendary film critic Roger Ebert has died. Ebert was 70 years old.</p><p>The Sun-Times, home of Ebert's review column for 46 years, <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/17320958-418/roger-ebert-dies-at-70-after-battle-with-cancer.html">wrote on Thursday</a> that Ebert "was without question the nation’s most prominent and influential film critic." He "had been in poor health over the past decade, battling cancers of the thyroid and salivary gland."</p><p>The tragic news comes only two days after the Ebert <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/roger_ebert_scales_back_to_review_only_the_movies_i_want_to_due_to_cancer/">announced that he was cutting back</a> from writing reviews due to his ailing health. The first-ever film critic to win a Pulitzer Prize, Ebert had ambitious plans to relaunch his web site and reconnect with audiences through a campaign to bring back his PBS show "At the Movies."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/film_critic_roger_ebert_dies_at_70/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/04/film_critic_roger_ebert_dies_at_70/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert scales back to review &#8220;only the movies I want to&#8221; due to cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/roger_ebert_scales_back_to_review_only_the_movies_i_want_to_due_to_cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/roger_ebert_scales_back_to_review_only_the_movies_i_want_to_due_to_cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film critic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13259850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Pulitzer Prize-winning film critic announced a "leave of presence" on Tuesday night]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Preeminent film critic Roger Ebert <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2013/04/a_leave_of_presense.html">announced late last night</a> that he is cutting back from his work due to his ongoing struggle with cancer.</p><p>Ebert, the first film critic to win a Pulitzer Prize, has been penning reviews for 46 years to the day, and writes over 200 reviews a year. Last year, Ebert wrote a career-high of 306.</p><p>Now, the prolific reviewer is taking what he refers to as a "leave of presence":</p><blockquote><p>"What in the world is a leave of presence? It means I am not going away. My intent is to continue to write selected reviews but to leave the rest to a talented team of writers handpicked and greatly admired by me. What's more, I'll be able at last to do what I've always fantasized about doing: reviewing only the movies I want to review."</p></blockquote><p>Though narrowing his writing focus, Ebert will expand his reach in other ways, including starting a Kickstarter campaign to bring back his PBS program, "At the Movies," attempting to turn a video game or app into a movie, collaborating with Martin Scorsese over an Ebert biopic and managing the relaunch of his Web site, Rogerebert.com.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/roger_ebert_scales_back_to_review_only_the_movies_i_want_to_due_to_cancer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/roger_ebert_scales_back_to_review_only_the_movies_i_want_to_due_to_cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My backup mom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/my_backup_mom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/my_backup_mom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aunts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13214008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A legendary film critic talks about the woman who helped shape him, and the mysteries of her life that still linger]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After she had the heart attack out in Michigan on Thanksgiving 1988, I stood by her bedside in the recovery room and she tried <em>so hard </em>to tell me something, but it just didn't work. I loved her so much. Did she know how much? I never told her. There are always questions you wish you'd asked after it's too late to get an answer. Sometimes years can pass before you realize they're questions.</p><p>Everyone said I "took after her," and I did. My features are more rounded than anyone else on either side of my family. Martha R. Stumm was the youngest of six surviving children of a Dutch-Irish-German couple who raised their family on a farm outside Tayorville, Ill. Years after her father died and her mother opened a boardinghouse in Urbana, enough oil was found beneath the land to make it worth drilling.</p><p>I visited the farm in the 1960s with my mom and dad, Aunt Martha and Cousin Bernardine from Stonington. It was a two-story frame house on a smallish footprint. Wallpaper was still hanging from the walls. They remembered their pony that lived in the barn, and they followed the path they ran on barefoot down to the river. Their dad was not only a farmer but ran a billiard parlor in Taylorville, and took out witty wisecracks in the classified section of the local paper.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/my_backup_mom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/my_backup_mom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert: Hospital visit for hairline fracture, not cancer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/roger_ebert_hospital_visit_for_hairline_fracture_not_cancer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/roger_ebert_hospital_visit_for_hairline_fracture_not_cancer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 00:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On his blog, the brilliant writer denies "strange news" about his health, but calls pain "off the charts"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Famed film critic Roger Ebert <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/">took to his blog Saturday evening to deny</a> rumors about his health and clarify his condition, after a hospital visit. Ebert says he has a "nearly invisible hairline fracture involving my left femur." While the pain is terrible, he said it has nothing to do with the thyroid cancer he has been battling for the better part of a decade.</p><blockquote><p>I didn't fall. I didn't break it. It just sort of...happened to itself.</p> <p>Most of the time, it causes me no pain at all. But my left leg won't bear any weight, nor can I walk on it. About a week ago I began to feel pain downaround there. On Wednesday I had some X-rays. By Thursday I was nearly immobile. Now I'm back at my alma mater, Northwestwern Memorial Hospital. On Monday I'll probably be checking into the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. This will be my <em>fifth</em> visit there. Once again they'll teach me to walk. I am a slow learner.</p> <p>The pain is off the charts. It has nothing to do with cancer. It's plain bad luck. That's all the news. I plan to keep right on writing, Some strange news has been flying around. This will set the record straight.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/roger_ebert_hospital_visit_for_hairline_fracture_not_cancer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/roger_ebert_hospital_visit_for_hairline_fracture_not_cancer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hello, Mr. President? It&#8217;s me, Roger Ebert</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/hello_mr_president_its_me_roger_ebert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/hello_mr_president_its_me_roger_ebert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[One request for President obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brooklyn Castle]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think we need an emergency education program, investing in basics — and not $60 million high school stadiums]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would ask the president for an emergency education program. Our students at every level are below American historical norms and global standards. We're importing the best and the brightest from overseas, from nations that may not spend as much money on education but seem to produce better-prepared students.</p><p>I attended a Catholic grade school for eight years in the 1950s. When my class graduated, all of us (even the "slower" students) whizzed through public high school rhetoric so easily our new teachers remarked on it. Our school was poverty-stricken and had only basic facilities. But every one of us could read, write and do math. I believe we could read and write better than many of today's high school graduates, and some of today's colleges graduates.</p><p>Reading is the key to self-education. Let me give an example that has been obsessing me. Nearly 50 percent of all Americans reject the Theory of Evolution and believe Man was "created" pretty much in his present form some thousands of years ago. Anyone who believes that hasn't been paying attention.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/hello_mr_president_its_me_roger_ebert/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/hello_mr_president_its_me_roger_ebert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Five pop culture items we missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gwyneth Paltrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's catch: Gwyneth Paltrow is a 9/11 hero, Gerard Depardieu pees on people, and "Lone Ranger" nixes werewolves]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1. Cause of the day:</strong> Kate Winslet founds "<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/8700007/Kate-Winslet-joins-forces-in-cosmetic-surgery-battle.html">British Anti-Cosmetic Surgery League</a>" (for very famous people) along with Emma Thompson and Rachel Weisz. Maybe they can be like sister suffragettes and battle the <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/10/sarah_burge_breast_surgery_child">Barbie Mom</a>!</p><p><strong>2. Celebrity story involving airlines and urine of the day:</strong> When Gerard Depardieu wasn't allowed to use the toilet during takeoff, <a href="http://www.edmontonjournal.com/mobile/iphone/news/top-stories/Gerard+Depardieu+outrages+passengers+urinating+plane/5267196/story.html">he peed all over fellow passengers on an Air France flight</a>. Says Air France spokesperson: "I confirm the fact that he [Depardieu] did indeed urinate in the plane." That is all.</p><p><strong>3. "Gwyneth Paltrow saved my life on 9/11" story of the day:</strong> Wait, really? I could almost forgive Paltrow for her multitude of sins if she acted heroically on Sept. 11. So let's check it out:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ryan Dunn&#8217;s alcohol level played factor in fatal crash</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/ryan_dunn_over_alcohol_limit_crash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/ryan_dunn_over_alcohol_limit_crash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackass 3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/22/ryan_dunn_over_alcohol_limit_crash</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police now confirm that the "Jackass" star was more than two times over legal drinking limit at time of death]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan Dunn, the "Jackass" star who died in a fatal car crash on Monday, had a blood alcohol level of .196 percent at the time of his death, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/SHOWBIZ/celebrity.news.gossip/06/22/ryan.dunn.drunk/">police told the press today</a>. That is over twice the legal amount, confirming reports that Dunn had been intoxicated when he drove home from a Pennsylvania bar early that morning.&#160; Dunn's death has been at the center of a media firestorm <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/twitter/?story=/ent/tv/feature/2011/06/21/ryan_dunn_death_roger_ebert_twitter">for the past three days</a>, with "Jackass" fans lashing out at Roger Ebert after the critic tweeted about "not letting Jackasses drink and drive."&#160; Photos of Dunn doing shots with friends <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2011/06/22/2011-06-22_ryan_dunn_drunk_before_fatal_crash_cops_say_jackass_stars_bac_was_more_than_twic.html">surfaced on Twitter hours before his death</a>, but until now there was no confirmed evidence that alcohol played role in the crash.</p><p>Dunn and his passenger, a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/21/zachary-hartwell-ryan-dunn-crash-passenger_n_881157.html">Navy SEAL named Zachary Hartwell</a>, skidded off the road at 3 a.m. in Dunn's Porsche. The car was going approximately 132-140 mph when it hit a tree, causing the vehicle to catch on fire. Their deaths were caused by "blunt and thermal trauma," according to the autopsy report.</p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/ryan_dunn_over_alcohol_limit_crash/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/ryan_dunn_over_alcohol_limit_crash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The best and worst celebrity tweets about Osama&#8217;s death</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/03/best_worst_celebrity_tweets_osama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/03/best_worst_celebrity_tweets_osama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/05/03/best_worst_celebrity_tweets_osama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Martin, Charlie Sheen and Rob Lowe: Who had the craziest reaction to the killing of bin Laden?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday we asked two very important questions about people's reactions to Osama bin Laden's death: "<a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/05/02/osama_bin_laden_jokes/index.html">Is it too soon to laugh?</a>" and "<a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/05/02/chet_haze_osama_bin_laden/index.html">Can celebrities be held responsible for their (or their kids') tweets on historic occasions?</a>"</p><p>As it turns out, the answer is "yes" and "yes." While some comedians actually provided clever and insightful commentary on yesterday's news, far more went the easy route and just added to the deafening roar of bloodthirsty pro-America shouting. Today we look back and find the good, the bad and the ugly of celebrity Twitter reactions to Osama's death.</p><p>First, there was the "What about ME?" response: Both <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/lilyroseallen/status/64942742333177856">Lily Allen</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheRock/status/64880938504564736">The Rock</a> celebrated their birthdays yesterday and didn't want that fact to get overshadowed in all the hubbub.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/03/best_worst_celebrity_tweets_osama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/03/best_worst_celebrity_tweets_osama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ebert attacks my &#8220;Secretariat&#8221; review &#8212; it&#8217;s on!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/08/ebert_secretariat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/08/ebert_secretariat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretariat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/10/08/ebert_secretariat</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My response to the critic's takedown of my takedown]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/secretariat/index.html?story=/ent/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/10/06/secretariat">published a review</a> of the new Disney film "Secretariat" that took an unorthodox and admittedly inflammatory approach to a would-be inspirational movie about a lady and a racehorse. Nearly all viewers will choose to see or not see the movie based on their level of interest in watching Diane Lane in an awesome array of early-'70s fashions, or watching exciting re-creations of the 1973 Triple Crown races. I accused the film of concealing -- or embodying, that's a better word -- an ideological worldview that is never made explicit but is present in every frame.</p><p>I don't claim the review makes its case with perfect clarity, and I didn't expect many people to agree completely. Being forcefully told that you're full of crap goes with the job description, especially in an inherently subjective endeavor like movie criticism. I was gratified that a lot of people read the review, and e-mailed or Tweeted it onward -- and was somewhere between flattered and startled that Roger Ebert posted a <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/10/secretariat_was_not_a_christia.html">lengthy takedown</a> of my review on his Chicago Sun-Times blog. Like almost everyone in this insular field, I venerate Roger as a passionate movie lover, a generous spirit, and an old-school journalist who has made the transition to new media and now pretty much owns the joint.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/08/ebert_secretariat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/08/ebert_secretariat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not eating, but still cooking: Roger Ebert pens cookbook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/roger_ebert_cookbook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/roger_ebert_cookbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooking techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2010/06/29/roger_ebert_cookbook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critic was inspired by responses to a blog post about ... rice cookers?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cancer may have robbed Roger Ebert of the ability to eat, but it won't stop him from dishing out cooking advice.</p><p>Four years after cancer surgery left the famed film critic unable to speak or eat, Ebert is publishing a cookbook dedicated to rice cookers, a kitchen appliance he lovingly calls "The Pot" and champions as an answer for those strapped for cash, time and counter space.</p><p>"To be sure, health problems have prevented me from eating," Ebert writes in the book. "That did not discourage my cooking. It became an exercise more pure, freed of biological compulsion."</p><p>The idea for the book came after a 2008 blog post he wrote about rice cookers prompted hundreds of comments, with many readers including their favorite recipes. "I think I was somewhat frustrated by not being able to eat and I wanted to live vicariously," the 68-year-old said during an interview at his Chicago home, his laptop computer speaking his typed answers.</p><p>The book includes many of those comments, as well as more than two dozen recipes for dishes such as chili, risotto, jambalaya and oatmeal -- Ebert's favorite. He took a witty and funny tone when writing it; he says he didn't want it to sound too specialized or difficult.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/roger_ebert_cookbook/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/roger_ebert_cookbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter feud: Ebert vs. Breitbart</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/twitter_feud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/twitter_feud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/04/07/twitter_feud</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The film critic and the commentator tweeted their way through a minor spat over Herzog's "Grizzly Man"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tweet wars are not exactly the stuff epic battles are made of, but they do make for entertaining reads, especially when they occur between two strong personalities like <a href="http://twitter.com/EBERTCHICAGO">Roger Ebert</a> and right-wing media controversialist <a href="http://twitter.com/andrewbreitbart">Andrew Breitbart</a>. The two were caught up in a t&#234;te-&#224;-t&#234;te on Tuesday over Timothy Treadwill, the bear enthusiast whose life and death was explored in Werner Herzog's 2005 documentary "Grizzly Man." The squabble started when Ebert tweeted his review of "Aguirre, the Wrath of God," Herzog's 1972 film, which prompted Breitbart to bait the great critic:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/twitter_feud/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/twitter_feud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert &#8220;deeply involved&#8221; in TV talks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/us_ebert_review_show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/us_ebert_review_show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2010/03/25/us_ebert_review_show</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critic preparing new movie-review show, and promises, "the Thumbs will return"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger Ebert says he and his wife are going ahead with plans to produce a new movie review television program with the working title "Roger Ebert presents At the Movies."</p><p>The famous movie reviewer wrote Thursday on his Chicago Sun-Times blog that he can't give details, but they're "deeply involved" in talks. Ebert says they've held video tests with potential hosts and they know who they will use. He says the new show would have a strong presence online.</p><p>The Pulitzer Prize-winning reviewer writes that he would like to make "occasional appearances" on the air. Ebert lost his ability to speak after cancer surgery.</p><p>Ebert also writes: "the Thumbs will return," referring to the well-known "thumbs up" and "thumbs down" reviews.</p><p>------</p><p>On the Net:</p><p><a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/">http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/us_ebert_review_show/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/us_ebert_review_show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert on &#8220;Oprah&#8221;: The critic&#8217;s voice</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/02/roger_ebert_speaks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/02/roger_ebert_speaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/2010/03/02/roger_ebert_speaks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He's lost the ability to speak, but  the outspoken writer still has plenty to say -- and a new way to say it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger Ebert is all kinds of badass. He wrote <a href="http://www.beyondthevalleyofthedolls.com/home.html">a Russ Meyer movie</a> (one that's crazy even by Russ Meyer standards). He has a Pulitzer Prize. He's done more for thumbs than any individual since the days of the gladiators. And while he's easily lumped into the big fat group of givers of movie marquee exclamations, he remains, in truth, one of the most consistently passionate, insightful, witty and bold film critics the form has ever known. In recent years, throughout his very public battle with thyroid cancer, he has been forthright, and self-deprecating -- writing recently that "Well, <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/02/roger_eberts_last_words_cont.html">we're all dying in increments.</a>"&#160;</p><p>Tuesday, on his old pal Oprah Winfrey's show, Ebert made a rare television appearance and "spoke" for the first time in almost four years -- about cancer, about childhood memories, and about the best movies of the year. Though multiple surgeries have robbed him of his power of speech and his ability to eat and drink (he gets his nutrition via a feeding tube now) &#8211; the 67-year-old remains as opinionated &#8211; and overscheduled &#8211; as ever.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/02/roger_ebert_speaks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/02/roger_ebert_speaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
