<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Roger Ebert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/roger_ebert/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Five pop culture items we missed</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gwyneth Paltrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop five]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today's catch: Gwyneth Paltrow is a 9/11 hero, Gerard Depardieu pees on people, and "Lone Ranger" nixes werewolves]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>1. Cause of the day:</strong> Kate Winslet founds "<a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/8700007/Kate-Winslet-joins-forces-in-cosmetic-surgery-battle.html">British Anti-Cosmetic Surgery League</a>" (for very famous people) along with Emma Thompson and Rachel Weisz. Maybe they can be like sister suffragettes and battle the <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/10/sarah_burge_breast_surgery_child">Barbie Mom</a>!</p><p><strong>2. Celebrity story involving airlines and urine of the day:</strong> When Gerard Depardieu wasn't allowed to use the toilet during takeoff, <a href="http://www.edmontonjournal.com/mobile/iphone/news/top-stories/Gerard+Depardieu+outrages+passengers+urinating+plane/5267196/story.html">he peed all over fellow passengers on an Air France flight</a>. Says Air France spokesperson: "I confirm the fact that he [Depardieu] did indeed urinate in the plane." That is all.</p><p><strong>3. "Gwyneth Paltrow saved my life on 9/11" story of the day:</strong> Wait, really? I could almost forgive Paltrow for her multitude of sins if she acted heroically on Sept. 11. So let's check it out:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/pop_five_gerard_depardieu_airplane_pee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ryan Dunn&#8217;s alcohol level played factor in fatal crash</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/ryan_dunn_over_alcohol_limit_crash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/ryan_dunn_over_alcohol_limit_crash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackass 3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/06/22/ryan_dunn_over_alcohol_limit_crash</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Police now confirm that the "Jackass" star was more than two times over legal drinking limit at time of death]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan Dunn, the "Jackass" star who died in a fatal car crash on Monday, had a blood alcohol level of .196 percent at the time of his death, <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2011/SHOWBIZ/celebrity.news.gossip/06/22/ryan.dunn.drunk/">police told the press today</a>. That is over twice the legal amount, confirming reports that Dunn had been intoxicated when he drove home from a Pennsylvania bar early that morning.&#160; Dunn's death has been at the center of a media firestorm <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/twitter/?story=/ent/tv/feature/2011/06/21/ryan_dunn_death_roger_ebert_twitter">for the past three days</a>, with "Jackass" fans lashing out at Roger Ebert after the critic tweeted about "not letting Jackasses drink and drive."&#160; Photos of Dunn doing shots with friends <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/2011/06/22/2011-06-22_ryan_dunn_drunk_before_fatal_crash_cops_say_jackass_stars_bac_was_more_than_twic.html">surfaced on Twitter hours before his death</a>, but until now there was no confirmed evidence that alcohol played role in the crash.</p><p>Dunn and his passenger, a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/21/zachary-hartwell-ryan-dunn-crash-passenger_n_881157.html">Navy SEAL named Zachary Hartwell</a>, skidded off the road at 3 a.m. in Dunn's Porsche. The car was going approximately 132-140 mph when it hit a tree, causing the vehicle to catch on fire. Their deaths were caused by "blunt and thermal trauma," according to the autopsy report.</p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/ryan_dunn_over_alcohol_limit_crash/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/22/ryan_dunn_over_alcohol_limit_crash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The best and worst celebrity tweets about Osama&#8217;s death</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/03/best_worst_celebrity_tweets_osama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/03/best_worst_celebrity_tweets_osama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Sheen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Going Viral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/05/03/best_worst_celebrity_tweets_osama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steve Martin, Charlie Sheen and Rob Lowe: Who had the craziest reaction to the killing of bin Laden?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday we asked two very important questions about people's reactions to Osama bin Laden's death: "<a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/05/02/osama_bin_laden_jokes/index.html">Is it too soon to laugh?</a>" and "<a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/05/02/chet_haze_osama_bin_laden/index.html">Can celebrities be held responsible for their (or their kids') tweets on historic occasions?</a>"</p><p>As it turns out, the answer is "yes" and "yes." While some comedians actually provided clever and insightful commentary on yesterday's news, far more went the easy route and just added to the deafening roar of bloodthirsty pro-America shouting. Today we look back and find the good, the bad and the ugly of celebrity Twitter reactions to Osama's death.</p><p>First, there was the "What about ME?" response: Both <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/lilyroseallen/status/64942742333177856">Lily Allen</a> and <a href="http://twitter.com/#!/TheRock/status/64880938504564736">The Rock</a> celebrated their birthdays yesterday and didn't want that fact to get overshadowed in all the hubbub.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/03/best_worst_celebrity_tweets_osama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/03/best_worst_celebrity_tweets_osama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ebert attacks my &#8220;Secretariat&#8221; review &#8212; it&#8217;s on!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/08/ebert_secretariat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/08/ebert_secretariat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 14:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretariat]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/10/08/ebert_secretariat</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My response to the critic's takedown of my takedown]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/secretariat/index.html?story=/ent/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/10/06/secretariat">published a review</a> of the new Disney film "Secretariat" that took an unorthodox and admittedly inflammatory approach to a would-be inspirational movie about a lady and a racehorse. Nearly all viewers will choose to see or not see the movie based on their level of interest in watching Diane Lane in an awesome array of early-'70s fashions, or watching exciting re-creations of the 1973 Triple Crown races. I accused the film of concealing -- or embodying, that's a better word -- an ideological worldview that is never made explicit but is present in every frame.</p><p>I don't claim the review makes its case with perfect clarity, and I didn't expect many people to agree completely. Being forcefully told that you're full of crap goes with the job description, especially in an inherently subjective endeavor like movie criticism. I was gratified that a lot of people read the review, and e-mailed or Tweeted it onward -- and was somewhere between flattered and startled that Roger Ebert posted a <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/10/secretariat_was_not_a_christia.html">lengthy takedown</a> of my review on his Chicago Sun-Times blog. Like almost everyone in this insular field, I venerate Roger as a passionate movie lover, a generous spirit, and an old-school journalist who has made the transition to new media and now pretty much owns the joint.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/08/ebert_secretariat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/08/ebert_secretariat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>139</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not eating, but still cooking: Roger Ebert pens cookbook</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/roger_ebert_cookbook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/roger_ebert_cookbook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cooking techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2010/06/29/roger_ebert_cookbook</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critic was inspired by responses to a blog post about ... rice cookers?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cancer may have robbed Roger Ebert of the ability to eat, but it won't stop him from dishing out cooking advice.</p><p>Four years after cancer surgery left the famed film critic unable to speak or eat, Ebert is publishing a cookbook dedicated to rice cookers, a kitchen appliance he lovingly calls "The Pot" and champions as an answer for those strapped for cash, time and counter space.</p><p>"To be sure, health problems have prevented me from eating," Ebert writes in the book. "That did not discourage my cooking. It became an exercise more pure, freed of biological compulsion."</p><p>The idea for the book came after a 2008 blog post he wrote about rice cookers prompted hundreds of comments, with many readers including their favorite recipes. "I think I was somewhat frustrated by not being able to eat and I wanted to live vicariously," the 68-year-old said during an interview at his Chicago home, his laptop computer speaking his typed answers.</p><p>The book includes many of those comments, as well as more than two dozen recipes for dishes such as chili, risotto, jambalaya and oatmeal -- Ebert's favorite. He took a witty and funny tone when writing it; he says he didn't want it to sound too specialized or difficult.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/roger_ebert_cookbook/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/roger_ebert_cookbook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter feud: Ebert vs. Breitbart</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/twitter_feud/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/twitter_feud/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Breitbart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/04/07/twitter_feud</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The film critic and the commentator tweeted their way through a minor spat over Herzog's "Grizzly Man"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tweet wars are not exactly the stuff epic battles are made of, but they do make for entertaining reads, especially when they occur between two strong personalities like <a href="http://twitter.com/EBERTCHICAGO">Roger Ebert</a> and right-wing media controversialist <a href="http://twitter.com/andrewbreitbart">Andrew Breitbart</a>. The two were caught up in a t&#234;te-&#224;-t&#234;te on Tuesday over Timothy Treadwill, the bear enthusiast whose life and death was explored in Werner Herzog's 2005 documentary "Grizzly Man." The squabble started when Ebert tweeted his review of "Aguirre, the Wrath of God," Herzog's 1972 film, which prompted Breitbart to bait the great critic:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/twitter_feud/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/twitter_feud/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert &#8220;deeply involved&#8221; in TV talks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/us_ebert_review_show/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/us_ebert_review_show/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 22:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/2010/03/25/us_ebert_review_show</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Critic preparing new movie-review show, and promises, "the Thumbs will return"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger Ebert says he and his wife are going ahead with plans to produce a new movie review television program with the working title "Roger Ebert presents At the Movies."</p><p>The famous movie reviewer wrote Thursday on his Chicago Sun-Times blog that he can't give details, but they're "deeply involved" in talks. Ebert says they've held video tests with potential hosts and they know who they will use. He says the new show would have a strong presence online.</p><p>The Pulitzer Prize-winning reviewer writes that he would like to make "occasional appearances" on the air. Ebert lost his ability to speak after cancer surgery.</p><p>Ebert also writes: "the Thumbs will return," referring to the well-known "thumbs up" and "thumbs down" reviews.</p><p>------</p><p>On the Net:</p><p><a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/">http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/us_ebert_review_show/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/25/us_ebert_review_show/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert on &#8220;Oprah&#8221;: The critic&#8217;s voice</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/02/roger_ebert_speaks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/02/roger_ebert_speaks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oprah Winfrey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/2010/03/02/roger_ebert_speaks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He's lost the ability to speak, but  the outspoken writer still has plenty to say -- and a new way to say it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roger Ebert is all kinds of badass. He wrote <a href="http://www.beyondthevalleyofthedolls.com/home.html">a Russ Meyer movie</a> (one that's crazy even by Russ Meyer standards). He has a Pulitzer Prize. He's done more for thumbs than any individual since the days of the gladiators. And while he's easily lumped into the big fat group of givers of movie marquee exclamations, he remains, in truth, one of the most consistently passionate, insightful, witty and bold film critics the form has ever known. In recent years, throughout his very public battle with thyroid cancer, he has been forthright, and self-deprecating -- writing recently that "Well, <a href="http://blogs.suntimes.com/ebert/2010/02/roger_eberts_last_words_cont.html">we're all dying in increments.</a>"&#160;</p><p>Tuesday, on his old pal Oprah Winfrey's show, Ebert made a rare television appearance and "spoke" for the first time in almost four years -- about cancer, about childhood memories, and about the best movies of the year. Though multiple surgeries have robbed him of his power of speech and his ability to eat and drink (he gets his nutrition via a feeding tube now) &#8211; the 67-year-old remains as opinionated &#8211; and overscheduled &#8211; as ever.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/02/roger_ebert_speaks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/02/roger_ebert_speaks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/08/qotd_96/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/08/qotd_96/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/04/08/qotd</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger Ebert takes down Bill O'Reilly after O'Reilly named Ebert's paper to his "Hall of Shame."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News host Bill O'Reilly recently named the Chicago Sun-Times, a paper that actually used to print his syndicated column, to his "Hall of Shame," a <a href="http://www.billoreilly.com/pg/jsp/general/mediadef.jsp">list</a> of media outlets that "have regularly helped distribute defamatory, false or non-newsworthy information supplied by far left websites" and O'Reilly "recommend[s] that you do not patronize or advertise with."</p><p>Roger Ebert, himself a 40-year veteran of the Sun-Times, has penned a <a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090407/COMMENTARY/904079997/-1/RSS">thank-you note</a> to O'Reilly for the inclusion of the paper. Ebert sure has a funny -- literally and figuratively -- way of showing his appreciation, though:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/04/08/qotd_96/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/04/08/qotd_96/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Ebert and Mohammed Atta, partners in crime</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/12/horowitz_database/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/12/horowitz_database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2005 19:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/04/12/horowitz_database</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Horowitz has a new project calculated to give the left apoplexy: A Web site that proclaims insidious links between latte liberals and murderous Islamists.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Horowitz has lived a rich, and contradictory, life. He once contributed to seminal leftist magazine Ramparts and hired for the Black Panthers, but then bitterly split with his leftist friends and reinvented himself as a conservative who may be the leading scourge of left-leaning professors nationwide. His crusade to make liberal "indoctrination" a statutory offense has seized the backing of Republican lawmakers and the imaginations of campus followers. Recently, Horowitz launched a new Web site, <a target="new" href="http://discoverthenetwork.org">DiscoverTheNetwork.org,</a> to catalog and expose his enemies on the left. </p><p>When I called to interview him for Salon, listed on his site as an "apparatchik far-left" publication practically in league with Islamists, the former Salon columnist was strangely eager to appease me. Famous for breathing fire in public before admiring college Republicans, he scampered when I confronted him about his site's claims, even promising to rewrite some of them. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/04/12/horowitz_database/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/04/12/horowitz_database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now what?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/15/reacts_19/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/15/reacts_19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2000 03:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken, D-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Conason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2000/12/14/reacts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roger Ebert, David Horowitz, Andrew Sullivan, Noam Chomsky, Bianca Jagger and other Salon panelists panelists look ahead to the Bush years.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Bianca Jagger is an internationally famous political activist.</b> </p><p>I was born in Nicaragua, in a country where we had a dictatorship for 43 years. I grew up as a child not knowing what free elections meant. I longed through those years to be able to live in a country that abides by the principles of democracy. I used to think that America was a place where the will of the people elected a president. Having observed elections in third-world countries and having observed the irregularities that took place in the elections in America, I saw similarities. If a parallel situation had taken place in a third-world country, we would have called it fraud. We would have called for reelections or a recounting of the votes. </p><p>This is not a shining moment for American democracy because, in the end, Americans have opted to preserve the institutions rather than to preserve democracy. Vice President Gore was pushed into a wall. From every side they urged him to be gracious and to come out and concede defeat. But the truth, which we all know, was that this election was won by Gore, and that President-elect Bush is usurping the position of the presidency. He has stolen the presidency from Gore. I think a lot of people are frightened and too cautious of using plain English. The American media is afraid to use the word "fraud." <i>Why?</i> It is important for Americans who believe in democracy, its principles and independent legal institutions to speak up. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/15/reacts_19/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/15/reacts_19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remembering Dec. 8, 1980</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/08/lennon_remembered/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/08/lennon_remembered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/people/feature/2000/12/08/lennon_remembered</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert Altman, Lucianne Goldberg, Roger Ebert, Larry Flynt, T.C. Boyle, Catherine Zeta-Jones, Michael Douglas and others recall how they felt when they heard the news of John Lennon's death.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly everyone of a certain age remembers where they were on Dec. 8, 1980, when they learned of <a href="/directory/topics/john_lennon/index.html">John Lennon's</a> murder. That's hardly surprising. Whether or not you were a fan of <a href="/directory/topics/the_beatles/index.html">the Beatles,</a> of Lennon or of his bare-assed antiwar antics, his murder at the hands of a pathetic, deranged nebbish motivated by, of all things, <a href="/directory/topics/j_d_salinger/index.html">J.D. Salinger's</a> "The Catcher in the Rye," marked the beginning of a long, bitter winter of liberal discontent in America. Ronald Reagan had just been elected, and the '70s were most certainly over. Lennon's demise at the age of 40 seemed to augur the death of all those hopes based on the premise that "love is the answer." No wonder it knocked the wind out of so many. </p><p> Adding to the pain and anger was the irony that Lennon had only recently emerged from several years of withdrawal to produce a new album, "Double Fantasy," the initial track of which was titled "(Just Like) Starting Over." The record contained a number of superlative songs, such as "Woman," "Watching the Wheels" and "Beautiful Boy." Lennon was still involved in a media blitz on its behalf when he was shot by Mark David Chapman at the entrance to New York's Dakota Building at 1 W. 72nd St., where he was living with his wife, <a href="/weekly/tibetlink960527.html">Yoko Ono,</a> and their son, Sean. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/12/08/lennon_remembered/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/12/08/lennon_remembered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Degas to dot-com</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/14/bc_event/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/14/bc_event/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2000 21:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/audio/2000/11/14/bc_event</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Listen to the second annual celebration of Salon's "Brilliant Careers" series featuring Tracey Ullman, Roger Ebert, Mike Figgis and more!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> On Thursday, September 28th, cultural icons <b>Tracey Ullman,</b> <b>Roger Ebert,</b> <b>Stan Lee,</b> <b>Mike Figgis,</b> <b>Brenda Laurel</b> and <b>Jerry Harrison</b> appeared at the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in downtown San Francisco to discuss the fusion of arts, entertainment and technology in a provocative modern-day salon, entitled "From Degas to dot-com." The event, sponsored by Salon.com and Lexus, was emceed by <b>Ben Stein,</b> host of Comedy Central's "Win Ben Stein's Money." </p><p> Listen to "From Degas to dot-com," the second annual celebration of Salon's weekly profile series "Brilliant Careers."</p><p><b><a href="http://media.salon.com/real/brilliant111400.ram"> <img class='wp-image-10080808' src='http://media.salon.com/2000/11/sound5.gif' />Real Audio</a></b> [Duration: 80:52 min]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/11/14/bc_event/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/11/14/bc_event/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://media.salon.com/real/brilliant111400.ram" length="0" type="audio/x-realaudio" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who won the debate?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/04/reacts_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/04/reacts_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2000 07:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Gore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2000/10/04/reacts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Camille Paglia, Arianna Huffington, Roger Ebert,  Ben Stein and others weigh in on the partisan fisticuffs in Boston.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Round 1 is in the books. The much anticipated face-off between <a href="/directory/topics/al_gore/">Al Gore</a> and <a href="/directory/topics/george_w_bush/">George W. Bush</a> finally went down at the University of Massachusetts last night, keeping the cable news networks chattering into the night. Amid the clamor, no clear winner emerged. </p><p>Whether it was Bush's carping about "fuzzy math" or Gore's incessant deep sighing, undecided voters who went into the debate looking for answers seemed to walk away just as undecided. Even some of Salon's carnivorous partisans walked away disappointed, giving the performance a thumbs-down. </p><p><b>Camille Paglia is an author and a Salon columnist.</b> </p><p>My first reaction to last night's presidential debate was relief that, should he be elected, George W. Bush will not be as totally inarticulate and brain-cell-deficient as we have had abundant reason to fear over the past year. Bush's performance was occasionally shaky but competent, and he stressed his key issues in plain, common-sense language that probably connected with many voters outside the Northeastern media loop. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/10/04/reacts_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/10/04/reacts_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Don&#039;t link to hate sites!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/14/hate_sites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/14/hate_sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2000 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Shirley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/log/2000/04/14/hate_sites</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Film critic Roger Ebert takes on Hatewatch founder David Goldman over the practice of cataloging the Web pages of bigots.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>F</b>ilm critic Roger Ebert gave a thumbs down to online efforts to expose <a href="/tech/feature/1999/07/08/internet_hate/index.html">bigotry on the Web</a> Wednesday in a debate with the founder of <a target="new" href="http://www.hatewatch.org">Hatewatch.</a> Hate-monitoring sites, which link to racist, anti-semitic and homophobic sites, give bigots a "virtual supermarket" of online hate tools, Ebert said at this week's <a target="new" href="http://www.Colorado.EDU/cwa/">Conference on World Affairs,</a> an annual intellectual talkfest at the University of Colorado in Boulder. "If I were somebody looking for hate on the Web, this would be a good place to start," Ebert said of Hatewatch.</p><p>During Wednesday's debate with Hatewatch founder David Goldman, Ebert said he doesn't believe violence directly results from either film or Internet images: "Lee Harvey Oswald didn't have a Web site," he said. Yet it is ill-advised, he argued, to provide hate-seekers an online roadmap to the sites. "It's very easy to find it on the Web, but I don't know that we should make it any easier."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/04/14/hate_sites/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/04/14/hate_sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Glow</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/24/glow_239/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/24/glow_239/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joan Rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/glow/2000/03/24/glow</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon&#039;s TV picks for Weekend, March 24-26, 2000]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Series</b></p><p>Backstreet Boys wannabes from around the country audition to become the next boy band thing in <b>Making the Band (9 p.m. Fri., ABC)</b>, a new series from the creators of "The Real World" that could turn into the (extremely) guilty pleasure of the season. Chris Carter's sci-fi series <b>Harsh Realm (9 p.m. Fri., FX)</b>, which aired for only a couple of weeks on Fox, moves to FX, which will run the remaining never-aired episodes. Scott Bairstow stars as a soldier caught in a virtual reality war game. Academy Award nominee Michael Caine is interviewed on <b>Dateline NBC (9 p.m. Fri., NBC)</b>. In case you missed it last week, the first episode of <b>The Beat (9 p.m. Sun., UPN)</b>, a cop show from Tom Fontana and Barry Levinson of "Homicide" fame, has another showing. It's no "Homicide," but the two leads (Mark Ruffalo and Derek Cecil) grow on you. On <b>The Sopranos (9 p.m. Sun., HBO)</b>, Uncle Junior has a new girlfriend (uh-oh) and Tony goes legit until the heat dies down. Bill Maher hosts a post-Oscars <b>Politically Incorrect After Party (check local listings, Sun., ABC)</b>, with guests Chris Isaak, Arsenio Hall and Mr. Movie Fone, among others.</p><p><b>Specials</b></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/24/glow_239/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/24/glow_239/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Disney, we have a problem&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/10/mars_reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/10/mars_reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2000 18:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/log/2000/03/10/mars_reviews</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Film critics hoot at Brian De Palma&#039;s $100 million space epic.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>"I</b>n space, no one can hear you snore." That was the conclusion of the New York Times' Elvis Mitchell, leading off an across-the-boards critical fanny-whacking for Brian De Palma's $100 million "Mission to Mars."</p><p>The film, released through Disney's Touchstone Pictures, follows Tim Robbins, Gary Sinise and Don Cheadle through a space trip to the Red Planet, a disaster, and then a rescue mission that finds evidence of the origins of life on earth. The critics were unanimous in hooting at the film's ketchup-bottle pace, mind-numbing script and wooden performances. They also dismissed its New Age sentimentality and undifferentiated thematic amalgamation of, among other things, "2001: A Space Odyssey," "Close Encounters of the Third Kind," "The Abyss," "Contact" and "The Mummy."</p><p>Mitchell's review is among the nicest, actually. "After a couple of hours spinning around listening to this drivel," writes the Washington Post's Michael O'Sullivan, "I felt like I was going to barf."</p><p>Big-budget Hollywood actioners have been kicked around the solar system by critics before, of course -- take "Armageddon." But "Armageddon" made hundreds of millions of dollars for Disney. "Mission to Mars" lacks big stars  (Robbins, Sinise and Cheadle, respected though they are, don't exactly make the multiplexes go cha-ching), and thus far audience reactions have been mixed as well.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/03/10/mars_reviews/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/03/10/mars_reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Everyone&#039;s a critic &#8212; even Bill Clinton</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/08/clinton_ebert/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/08/clinton_ebert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/log/2000/02/08/clinton_ebert</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president joins Roger Ebert at the movies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>I</b>t's often embarrassing to see public figures trying to act like ordinary people, discussing the things most of us talk about routinely when we're hanging out with friends. And it's wise to be wary of people who make vague and unrealistic statements like, "I love movies!" and, "I try to see everything."</p><p>But when Bill Clinton made a guest appearance to talk about films on "Roger Ebert & the Movies" Sunday night, he was surprisingly relaxed -- hardly at all like a public figure trying to act like a regular guy. Maybe that was because the president seems to have actually put some thought into why he likes the movies he does. And even if you disagreed with his taste, you would have to admit that he did a better job articulating his opinions than your average dinner party guest. As for seeing "everything," Clinton did mention "Comedian  Harmonists," a 1997 Austrian-German picture about a 1930s singing group of the same name. This isn't a guy who limits himself to the new releases rack at Blockbuster.</p><p>Nor is Clinton a guy who merely drops the names of foreign films just to sound enlightened. He loves the perennial American favorites "High Noon" and "Casablanca," and had some insightful things to say about both "American Beauty" and "Fight Club," two pictures that anyone could have seen at a suburban multiplex.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/08/clinton_ebert/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/08/clinton_ebert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blue Glow</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/04/glow_205/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/04/glow_205/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Simpsons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/glow/2000/02/04/glow</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon&#039;s TV picks for Weekend, Feb. 4-6, 2000]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Series</b></p><p>The new sci-fi series <b>The Others (10 p.m. Sat., NBC)</b>, created by former "X-Files" hands Glen Morgan and James Wong, has to do with a diverse group of people who can communicate with the dead. <b>Futurama (7 p.m. Sun., Fox)</b> moves into a new time slot with an episode about mating season for crustacean Dr. Zoidberg. On <b>The Simpsons (8 p.m. Sun., Fox)</b>, the family visits the state fair, where Lisa learns yet again that life sucks and Bart comes into the possession of a racehorse. <b>Felicity (8 p.m. Sun., WB)</b> visits a therapist to unravel her feelings about her parents' breakup. <b>The X-Files (9 p.m. Sun., Fox)</b> gets back to the "what really happened to Mulder's sister" plot line with a two-parter about the mysterious abduction of another young girl. <b>Masterpiece Theatre (check local times, Sun., PBS)</b> has a new two-part adaptation of "Madame Bovary," starring Frances O'Connor ("Mansfield Park") as  the adulterous title character. Tony goes to Italy to take care of  some family business on <b>The Sopranos (9 p.m. Sun., HBO)</b>. <b>The Practice (10 p.m. Sun., ABC)</b> concludes its two-parter with the firm resorting to Plan B in its defense of a Los Angeles murderer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/02/04/glow_205/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/02/04/glow_205/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dave Kehr is going to CitySearch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/21/davekehr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/21/davekehr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2000 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roger Ebert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/media/col/elde/2000/01/21/davekehr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the country&#039;s best film critics is headed for the Web.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>R</b>espected film critic Dave Kehr has found a home on the Internet. Kehr, who reviewed films for the New York Daily News for six years, will become the senior movie critic for <a target="new" href="http://www.citysearch.com">CitySearch,</a> the local portal and transactions site.</p><p>Kehr, who has been freelancing since being sacked by the News at the end of '98, sounded relieved to have found a steady gig. "It's been a long time and I'm glad something really good came through," he said from his home in lower Manhattan. "I've been out of work for about a year now." When the New York Times was searching for a replacement for Janet Maslin last year, Kehr was considered a likely contender. (The job ultimately went to two critics, <a href="/media/col/elde/1999/12/09/new_film_crits/index.html">Elvis Mitchell and A.O. Scott.</a>)</p><p>"Dave Kehr is one of the most gifted film critics in America," said fellow Chicagoan Roger Ebert when told of Kehr's hire. "I felt he was a natural for jobs at the New York Times and elsewhere. He's one of those 'Doc Films' types from the University of Chicago -- he'd apparently seen every film ever made by the age of 20 -- and he has a sensibility that is open to directors who are doing new things."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2000/01/21/davekehr/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2000/01/21/davekehr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

