<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > rom-coms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/rom_coms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rewind: Celebrating the brilliance of &#8220;Moonlighting&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/rewind_celebrating_the_brilliance_of_moonlighting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/rewind_celebrating_the_brilliance_of_moonlighting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Mar 2013 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moonlighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Willis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybill shepherd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rom-coms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual tension]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moonlighting curse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[classic TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13223130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Modern, hilarious and energetic, "Moonlighting" dazzled us in the '80s -- and only looks more groundbreaking today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000TFI2OW/?tag=saloncom08-20">“Moonlighting,” </a>the wonderful romantic comedy co-starring Bruce Willis and Cybill Shepherd as bantering, codependent private detectives, aired on Tuesday nights on ABC from 1985 to 1989.  Unlike many of its contemporaries, “Moonlighting” remains a cultural touchstone — also airing on Tuesdays during those years, “The A-Team” and “Matlock”! — in large part because of the long shadow it has cast on TV romances: You know, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/20/new_girls_new_approach_to_romance/">the “Moonlighting” curse</a>. But the focus on the curse has unfairly narrowed “Moonlighting’s” legacy. It means that when we talk about “Moonlighting,” we’re usually talking about what “Moonlighting” got wrong, and that, as David Addison might say, makes about as much sense as zebras speaking Martian. “Moonlighting” is and was stunningly modern, hilarious and energetic in a still breathtaking way, meta before meta was standard, a social media series before there was social media. (The first show to talk about the “Moonlighting” curse was basically “Moonlighting.”) So, forthwith, a consideration of “Moonlighting” that has nothing to do with romance at all.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/rewind_celebrating_the_brilliance_of_moonlighting/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/09/rewind_celebrating_the_brilliance_of_moonlighting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whispering sweet post-structuralist nothings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/whispering_sweet_post_structuralist_nothings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/whispering_sweet_post_structuralist_nothings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Franzen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Egan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lana del ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Eugenides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rom-coms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben lerner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chad harbach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben kunkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-structuralism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roland barthes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13190809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Novelists like Jennifer Egan and Jeffrey Eugenides employ theory jargon as flirty banter. Is this the new rom-com?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite love song of the past few years is “Video Games,” by Lana Del Ray because of the third line of the chorus. It's the song's most burlesque moment, a come-on that should feel scuzzy and hackneyed, that should ruin everything: “I heard that you like the bad girls, honey.” But it catapults the song over all the barricades I’ve erected in my soul against love songs and against songs in which the singer self-identifies as “bad.” The reason is that the melody in which this particular line is sung cuts against its meaning. Because the words are about sex, you’d expect the song’s heretofore sultry melody to remain sultry or wax sultrier. Instead, on the words “bad girls, honey,” the vocal goes high, chaste, folky. If you only heard this snippet of melody, without words or context, you’d guess it belonged in an Indigo Girls song about ghosts or injustice, or in a lament about Scotland. That’s why the “bad girls, honey” kills me: The words are able to register as hot because the notes are cold. The operative principle here — you can get away with saying something very warm if you deliver it in a cold medium — also explains why Lana Del Ray gave this warmest of torch songs the coldest of names.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/whispering_sweet_post_structuralist_nothings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/whispering_sweet_post_structuralist_nothings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
