<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Romance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/romance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 21:58:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Love Is All You Need&#8221;: Pierce Brosnan&#8217;s lovely, lightweight rom-com</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/love_is_all_you_need_pierce_brosnans_lovely_lightweight_romcom/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/love_is_all_you_need_pierce_brosnans_lovely_lightweight_romcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 18:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romantic comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love Is All You Need]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pierce Brosnan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13285820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former James Bond and the spectacular Trine Dyrholm star in Oscar-winner Susanne Bier's winning love story]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Danish director Susanne Bier has spent her career stuck in the mushy European middle, halfway between Ingmar Bergman and Hollywood. She has a tremendous gift for character and storytelling, coupled with a penchant for preachy, melodramatic message delivery in the Paul Haggis vein, especially as her films have attracted a global audience. She won the foreign-language Oscar for the Euro-guilt odyssey <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/01/in_a_better_world/">“In a Better World”</a> in 2010 – a picture that was conspicuously trying to be meaningful – and has made one semi-unsuccessful American venture, the 2007 <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00114XTHA/?tag=saloncom08-20">“Things We Lost in the Fire,”</a> with Halle Berry and Benicio del Toro.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/love_is_all_you_need_pierce_brosnans_lovely_lightweight_romcom/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/30/love_is_all_you_need_pierce_brosnans_lovely_lightweight_romcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On bisexuality: An apology</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/on_bisexuality_an_apology/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/on_bisexuality_an_apology/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Since You Asked]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feelings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verbal Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychotherapy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13275024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plus: I can't get close to him. We've been dating for two months and he still seems distant]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Reader,</p><p>Regarding my last two columns, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/21_and_bi_should_i_marry/" target="_blank">this one</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/18/more_thinking_on_bisexuality/" target="_blank">this one,</a> I seem to have made an error that was offensive to many people who identify as bisexual, and I apologize. I do. I really do. I can really fall in love with my own nonsense sometimes. And to those who have written agreeing with me, I appreciate it, but I think I was wrong.</p><p>Here is the flaw in my thinking, courtesy of a kindly scholar of argument:</p><p>"Logically, your position relies on a fallacy of amphiboly that confuses two different uses of the term 'two.'  Being attracted to 'two' sexes is not the same thing as wanting 'two' partners. Could a bisexual person be polyamorous?  Sure. But so could a heterosexual person. You say that being lesbian means one wants to be partners with women (etc).  Does that mean that being a lesbian means that one wants to be partners with ALL women?  More than one woman? By extension, does being heterosexual (man wants to be partners with women) mean that a man wants to be partners with ALL women? More than one? Besides, being bisexual doesn't mean that one has 'two' attractions.  It means that one’s preferences don’t necessarily depend on sex.  It’s not that you want to have sex with 'both' men and women.  It’s just as easily that you want to have sex with either a man or a woman."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/on_bisexuality_an_apology/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/19/on_bisexuality_an_apology/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roll in the hay: The rise of the Amish romance novel</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/holy_rumspringa_amish_romance_novels_taking_market_by_storm_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/holy_rumspringa_amish_romance_novels_taking_market_by_storm_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Novels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pennsylvania]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13249663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While not as steamy as "50 Shades of Grey," so-called "bonnet rippers" are selling like shoofly pies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Pequea Creek scrawls a looping signature through the farmland east of the city of Lancaster, Pennsyl­vania. On a map, one can see the creek’s cursive script winding between Route 30 and Route 340, two of the major routes through Amish country. Eleven million tourists visit Lancaster County each year, many of them traveling Route 30, with its chain restaurants, mega-outlets, and mini-golf courses, and Route 340, flanked by billboards for Jakey’s Amish Barbeque, Amish Country Aerial Tours, and Abe’s Buggy Rides.<br /> <a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" /></a></p><p>Near one oxbow of the Pequea, and not far from these highways, sits the Gordonville Book Store. Owned by an Amish man, the bookstore is a modest building with beige siding. On this snow-covered January day, laundry hangs stiff as card stock on the line between the store and an adjacent house. The store, which sells books, calendars, greeting cards, and gifts, serves mostly Amish and conservative Mennonite patrons. Sometimes English (i.e., non-Amish) people like me happen upon the store, and are pleased to find gas lanterns humming sotto voce and an Amish boy with a bowl cut and a high voice manning the cash register.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/holy_rumspringa_amish_romance_novels_taking_market_by_storm_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/24/holy_rumspringa_amish_romance_novels_taking_market_by_storm_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Girls&#8221; recap: Goodbye cruel &#8220;Girls&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/girls_recap_good_bye_cruel_girls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/girls_recap_good_bye_cruel_girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hannah horvath]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adam driver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Q-tip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eardrums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marnie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[allison williams]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13244506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was that romantic finale meant in all seriousness?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't know how I feel about the new Hannah-in-crisis. One of the great joys of Hannah was that even — especially — in her blundering, raw ineptitude, she was a force that, nonetheless, moved forward. Unlike the rest of us, with our piddling one step forward, two steps back, her massive jumps of misplaced courage — “I am the voice — or at least, a voice — of a generation” — were decimated by steady, incremental self-sabotage. The best part was that, unlike us, she would have been hard-pressed to differentiate the two.</p><p>So how can we make peace with this Hannah, who, after finally getting what she wants — a good (enough) job and a nice(ish) boy — is overcome by OCD, a terribly crippling condition in real life, and possibly so in drama. A very smart commenter on Facebook recently noted that the ear-poking seems almost an act of desperation, as if Hannah were trying to dig out her neurosis with a Q-tip. It certainly does, but what about losing Adam has caused this syndrome? Is it stopping her from writing the book? Is the book stopping her from writing Adam? Was the plot stopping Dunham from writing an explanation for either of these? Hannah is poking around for answers, lost and alone. As are we.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/girls_recap_good_bye_cruel_girls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/18/girls_recap_good_bye_cruel_girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephenie Meyer says &#8220;traditional romance&#8221; books are &#8220;too smutty&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/stephenie_meyer_says_traditional_romance_books_are_too_smutty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/stephenie_meyer_says_traditional_romance_books_are_too_smutty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[el james]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50 Shades of Grey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erotica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stephenie meyer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13225440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The "Twilight" author doesn't read erotica, either]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Twilight" author Stephenie Meyer may have spawned a culture of mommy porn and a subculture of vampire fetishism with her trilogy about Bella Swan and vampire lover Edward Cullen, but that was never her intention. The Mormon mother of three told <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/mar/11/stephenie-meyer-twilight-the-host">the Guardian's Kira Cochrane</a> recently that she has not read E.L. James' erotic "Twilight" fan-fiction,"Fifty Shades of Grey" -- or even most romance books -- because they are "too smutty":</p><blockquote><p>"When I ask Meyer whether she's read Fifty Shades, she quickly, emphatically, says no. She doesn't wish James ill at all, she says, but 'it's so not my genre. Erotica is not something I read. I don't even read traditional romance.' Why not? 'It's too smutty. There's a reason my books have a lot of innocence. That's the sort of world I live in.' "</p></blockquote><p>Her own "less-traditional" romance has been just as polarizing, though, with detractors labeling it as "abstinence porn." (Meyer was taken aback by the "the massive amount of fans that I hadn't expected, and the massive amount of people who hated it, which I also didn't expect.") She insists, however, that "Twilight" is about "true love":</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/stephenie_meyer_says_traditional_romance_books_are_too_smutty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/stephenie_meyer_says_traditional_romance_books_are_too_smutty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: When it comes to online dating, everyone&#8217;s a little bit of a Catfish</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/study_when_it_comes_to_online_dating_everyones_a_little_bit_of_a_catfish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/study_when_it_comes_to_online_dating_everyones_a_little_bit_of_a_catfish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Manti Te'o]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13213611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But white lies may be good for your dating prospects -- and lead to actual self-improvement, experts say ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don't know how much I would trust a "study" from a website that allows men to bid money on dates with women, so, you know, let's just start there.</p><p>Nonetheless, WhatsYourPrice.com <a href="http://www.amny.com/urbanite-1.812039/new-york-s-online-dating-profiles-rife-with-lies-embellishments-studies-1.4717467" target="_blank">conducted a survey</a> about how honest people are in their online dating profiles, and like similar studies, found that a majority of people lie in them. Women tend to lie most about their weight; men tend to lie most about their height and income. (Oh, <em>and</em> their marital status.)</p><p>The survey also found the highest concentration of no-good dirty rotten online profile fabricators in Atlanta, New York and Washington, D.C., while people in Houston, Phoenix, Boston, Charlotte, N.C., and Minneapolis were veritable George Washingtons of Internet dating.</p><p>But even the big liars aren't full-on Catfish-ing potential mates, just lacing their profiles with minor deceptions and indulging in the same kinds of white lies that men and women have been telling over watery cocktails at bars since the beginning of time: That they are fitter, better educated, wealthier -- you get the idea.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/study_when_it_comes_to_online_dating_everyones_a_little_bit_of_a_catfish/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/study_when_it_comes_to_online_dating_everyones_a_little_bit_of_a_catfish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;The New York Review of Books&#8221;: Where the literati find love</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_new_york_review_of_books_where_the_literati_find_love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_new_york_review_of_books_where_the_literati_find_love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the new york review of books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13201418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looking for a Mr. Darcy-type? The literary journal remains one way to find gentleman (and lady) callers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Disappointed by the available stock of suitors on Internet dating sites? Opposed to algorithmal love on principle? Worried your date won't get your "Ulysses" references?</p><p>Then why not let the New York Review of Books arrange your next blind date?</p><p>Celebrating its 50th anniversary this month, the literary journal that Tom Wolfe once called "the chief theoretical organ of Radical Chic" has been facilitating the union of the literati's not-so-theoretical organs since its founding in 1963.</p><p>And while the magazine's associate publisher, Catherine Tice, couldn't tell you why the journal decided to run personal ads, she can quote you the very first one: "Wife wanted: intelligent, beautiful, 18 to 25, broad-minded, sensitive, affectionate. For accomplished artist and exciting life. NYR box 1432," she <a href="http://www.npr.org/2013/02/09/171416212/literary-types-find-love-in-the-new-york-review-of-books" target="_blank">told</a> NPR.</p><p>Other favorites from the associate publisher:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_new_york_review_of_books_where_the_literati_find_love/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_new_york_review_of_books_where_the_literati_find_love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gallup report: The world is filled with love</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/gallup_report_the_world_is_filled_with_love/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/gallup_report_the_world_is_filled_with_love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gallup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13201273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They've got the numbers to prove it, too  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bloomberg News and Gallup took a look at the <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-13/valentine-s-day-and-the-economics-of-love.html" target="_blank">state of love in the world</a>, and the prognosis is pretty good.</p><p>In 2006 and 2007, Gallup went to 136 countries and asked people, “Did you experience love for a lot of the day yesterday?” Bloomberg <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-02-13/valentine-s-day-and-the-economics-of-love.html" target="_blank">broke down the numbers</a>, revealing that there are actually a lot of gooey feelings going around in the world.</p><p>In the United States, 81 percent of respondents reported feeling loved in the previous 24 hours, but the Philippines came out on top, with 93 percent of people reporting that they felt that loving feeling for a majority of their day. Armenia, where only 29 percent of respondents felt the warm glow of affection, came in a sad last.</p><p>Other interesting findings from the data include indicators that marriage, while a boon for love, might not be the best means of experiencing it. According to Bloomberg, "Across the world as a whole, the widowed and divorced are the least likely to experience love. Married folks feel more of it than singles. People who live together out of wedlock report getting even more love than married spouses."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/gallup_report_the_world_is_filled_with_love/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/gallup_report_the_world_is_filled_with_love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blind dates without algorithms</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/blind_dates_without_algorithms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/blind_dates_without_algorithms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OKCupid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crazy blind date]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13200559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went on three blind dates arranged by OKCupid's new app -- and lived to tell the tale]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dating sites like OKCupid talk up their math-based matchmaking systems, but no one thinks a few algorithms and questionnaires can foment love. Sure, it’s nice when your partner is as into “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Books-Thrones-Feast-Crows-Swords/dp/0345529057/saloncom08-20">A Song of Ice and Fire</a>” as you are. But shared hobbies and interests can’t predict love, chemistry, or even if you can tolerate hanging out with someone for more than five minutes .</p><p>With the launch of Crazy Blind Date, an app that randomly sets users up based on demographic information, OKCupid seems to be throwing up its hands and admitting that when it comes to finding love, shared tastes can only take you so far. The app works like this: you pick a time and a location, and OKCupid pulls up a list of potential dates in the area, along with their first names, ages and scrambled photos of their faces. You pick one, and let Eros (or booze) do the rest.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/blind_dates_without_algorithms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/blind_dates_without_algorithms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The worst of Valentine&#8217;s Day</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_worst_of_valentines_day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_worst_of_valentines_day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slideshow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentines Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Valentine's Day 2013]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13199351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 10 weirdest attempts at capitalizing on Cupid's holiday -- from juicing to pizza-scented perfume]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've always been a tad suspicious of the consumerist motivations behind Valentine's Day -- but that was before I became a "sex and relationships" writer. Now I'm a conspiracy theorist wearing a tinfoil-hat made of Hershey's Kisses wrappers. You need only take a glimpse of my in box around this time of year -- or better yet, actually read through the dozens of the scheming, hackneyed and downright bizarre V-Day pitches you'll find there -- to understand why.</p><p>I'm a fan of laughing instead of crying -- especially when it comes to the ceremonial excess of Feb. 14 -- so I bring you this year's 10 worst attempts to capitalize on Cupid's holiday.</p><p>[slide_show id="13199454"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_worst_of_valentines_day/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/the_worst_of_valentines_day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Whispering sweet post-structuralist nothings</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/whispering_sweet_post_structuralist_nothings/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/whispering_sweet_post_structuralist_nothings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan Franzen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jennifer Egan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pop music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lana del ray]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Eugenides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[literature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rom-coms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben lerner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chad harbach]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ben kunkel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-structuralism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roland barthes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical theory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13190809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Novelists like Jennifer Egan and Jeffrey Eugenides employ theory jargon as flirty banter. Is this the new rom-com?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite love song of the past few years is “Video Games,” by Lana Del Ray because of the third line of the chorus. It's the song's most burlesque moment, a come-on that should feel scuzzy and hackneyed, that should ruin everything: “I heard that you like the bad girls, honey.” But it catapults the song over all the barricades I’ve erected in my soul against love songs and against songs in which the singer self-identifies as “bad.” The reason is that the melody in which this particular line is sung cuts against its meaning. Because the words are about sex, you’d expect the song’s heretofore sultry melody to remain sultry or wax sultrier. Instead, on the words “bad girls, honey,” the vocal goes high, chaste, folky. If you only heard this snippet of melody, without words or context, you’d guess it belonged in an Indigo Girls song about ghosts or injustice, or in a lament about Scotland. That’s why the “bad girls, honey” kills me: The words are able to register as hot because the notes are cold. The operative principle here — you can get away with saying something very warm if you deliver it in a cold medium — also explains why Lana Del Ray gave this warmest of torch songs the coldest of names.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/whispering_sweet_post_structuralist_nothings/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/whispering_sweet_post_structuralist_nothings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Girls&#8221; recap: &#8220;I feel like I&#8217;m in a Nancy Meyers movie&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/girls_recap_i_feel_like_im_in_a_nancy_meyers_movie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/girls_recap_i_feel_like_im_in_a_nancy_meyers_movie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2013 03:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patrick stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lena Dunham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv recap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Girls recap]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13196926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hannah has an epiphany during a lost weekend with a Café Grumpy customer. But will it alter her life's course?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there's a way to win this critic's heart, it's to begin an episode by having Hannah make up a neologism that Urban Dictionary reveals already exists ("sexit"), only to have beautiful Patrick Wilson barge in to the coffeeshop where she works,. (If Patrick Wilson — here, brownstone-owner and physician Joshua — had been complaining about someone leaving dogshit on his lawn instead of employees leaving their trash in his garbage, Dunham would have hit the trifecta.)</p><p>In this episode, Hannah winds up in said brownstone after Ray, irate that his neighbor is asking him to do anything outside the realm of the door of the shop, assumes a defensive rigidity. Joshua (who, we learn later, insists on the “ua”) is not irate back, but confused. “I was hoping we could talk neighbor to neighbor,” he says, perplexed. No luck. To this grownup, they're on the same street. To Ray, they're not even in the same world.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/girls_recap_i_feel_like_im_in_a_nancy_meyers_movie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/11/girls_recap_i_feel_like_im_in_a_nancy_meyers_movie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Warm Bodies&#8221;: Love with an emo zombie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/warm_bodies_love_with_an_emo_zombie/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/warm_bodies_love_with_an_emo_zombie/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science Fiction and Fantasy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zombies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zombie apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Warm Bodies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romantic comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twilight]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13188286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lazy, stupid and cheerful, with bizarre Christian undertones, zombie romcom "Warm Bodies" aims for the Twi-crowd]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://warmbodiesmovie.com/">“Warm Bodies”</a> sounds a lot better in theory than it turns out to be in practice. Of course, that’s true of about 90 percent of Hollywood movies, and let’s pause for a second to reflect that the original concept here involves a retelling of “Romeo and Juliet,” with zombies. So to say that the movie is not quite as good as its mind-blowingly moronic premise is <em>not praise.</em> At any rate, “Warm Bodies” is more a mild-mannered, emo-flavored romcom than a zombie movie. It has some tepid action scenes, a few swatches of genuine humor and a general spirit of cheerfulness, especially considering it depicts a future in which civilization has been destroyed. That’s more than enough to make it a hit in the dreary depths of February, and early reviews suggest that we’ve all agreed to overlook the fact that it’s essentially lazy and stupid hackwork that makes the <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/twilight/">“Twilight”</a> movies look like a collaboration between David Lynch and Robert Bresson.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/warm_bodies_love_with_an_emo_zombie/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/warm_bodies_love_with_an_emo_zombie/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vladimir Putin calls on Boyz II Men to help boost Russian birth rate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/vladimir_putin_calls_on_boyz_ii_men_to_help_boost_russian_birth_rate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/vladimir_putin_calls_on_boyz_ii_men_to_help_boost_russian_birth_rate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir Putin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boyz II men]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R&B]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slow jamz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth rate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13188061</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president hopes that their romantic slow jamz will put Russians in the mood to make love]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not an Onion headline: Vladimir Putin, a Russian guy <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/13-images-of-vladimir-puting-doing-things">who does things</a>, has enlisted Boyz II Men to aid him in his "crusade to raise the country's birth rate." At least, that's what the way the <a href="http://www.themoscowtimes.com/arts_n_ideas/article/boyz-ii-men-expect-muscovites-to-bring-a-game-to-concert/474719.html">Moscow Times</a> spins it: On Feb. 6, the "stylish" 90s R&amp;B group will "perform a selection of their classic and new romantic ballads" in Moscow, "hopefully giving Russian men some inspiration ahead of St. Valentine's Day."</p><p>The <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timstanley/100200911/vladimir-putin-hires-boyz-ii-men-to-boost-the-russian-birth-rate-authoritarians-know-how-to-have-fun/">Telegraph</a> notes, however, that it's not clear if Putin personally invited the band:</p><blockquote><p>Whether or not the Russian kingpin personally got on the phone, tracked down their agent and demanded that they “do the show right here” is pure speculation on the newspaper’s part. It’s a little hard to believe … but it’s also not impossible to imagine.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/vladimir_putin_calls_on_boyz_ii_men_to_help_boost_russian_birth_rate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/vladimir_putin_calls_on_boyz_ii_men_to_help_boost_russian_birth_rate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I broke up with my life coach</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/i_broke_up_with_my_life_coach/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/i_broke_up_with_my_life_coach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matchmaker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matchmaking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[She was sweet and grandmotherly and told me I'd find love. Instead, I found myself in a dysfunctional relationship]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">I had stopped going to therapy in the spring. But by late August, my luck had turned. Specifically, my dating luck, which started to go bad with the breakup of my first real relationship at age 36, and was followed by a series of unsuccessful dates. The whole rotten season culminated in a cringe-inducing text message from a guy I’d just met that started with “I have an indecent proposal for you,” and ended with, “Here's looking at you, kid.” Talk about a gross misuse of  “Casablanca.”</p><p dir="ltr">But the beginning of fall always made me feel ungrounded. I traced my anxiety back to my teens, when my father committed suicide on Yom Kippur. If there was a recipe to create an anxious person, my parents must have followed it: I was the only child of a depressed father and a mother who lived through the Holocaust.  As an adult, I became a workaholic, traveling the world, and avoiding any deep romantic connections for fear a man would leave me like my father did. At least that’s what therapy taught me. I needed her help again.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/i_broke_up_with_my_life_coach/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/i_broke_up_with_my_life_coach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Love in the time of layoffs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/love_in_the_time_of_layoffs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/love_in_the_time_of_layoffs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2012 20:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Romance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Breakups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Job loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12972091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have unemployment fears followed us into the bedroom?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does love feel like when you don’t know what tomorrow will bring? When life as you imagined it seems further and further out of reach? How do you know when it’s time to hold on to what you’ve got, or let go in the face of mounting anxiety? What if you’re so stressed out you can’t even <em>think</em>?</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a></p><p>Trends like restructuring, privatization, mergers, downsizing, and relentlessly high unemployment are transforming intimate relationships. Chronic job insecurity is shifting the way we approach the idea of hooking up, having sex, staying together, and starting families. And it might just be changing the very nature of romance.</p><p>One minute you’re happily planning a life together and talking about having kids. Then, suddenly, everything changes.</p><p>Conservatives are forever preaching about family values, but their job-destroying, anti-worker policies have made it harder and harder for young people to put down roots and reach the level of stability required for long-term relationships and children.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/love_in_the_time_of_layoffs/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/08/03/love_in_the_time_of_layoffs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>