<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Ronald Reagan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/ronald_reagan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Auction claims to be selling vial of Reagan blood</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/auction_claims_to_be_selling_vial_of_reagan_blood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/auction_claims_to_be_selling_vial_of_reagan_blood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/05/22/auction_claims_to_be_selling_vial_of_reagan_blood/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The blood sample was taken after Reagan was shot in a 1981 assassination attempt]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LONDON (AP) — A Channel Islands online auction house has angered Ronald Reagan's foundation by claiming to offer a vial that once contained his blood.</p><p>The PFCAuctions house says the vial contains some of Reagan's dried blood residue. The auctioneers say it was used by the laboratory that tested Reagan's blood when he was hospitalized after a 1981 assassination attempt in Washington.</p><p>Officials at the Ronald Reagan Foundation in California have told BBC News that the sale is despicable.</p><p>Auction house spokeswoman Kylie Whitehead told The Associated Press that the blood is being sold by a man whose late mother took it from the laboratory with permission weeks after the tests were made.</p><p>Bidding for the vial had passed the 7,000-pound ($11,000) mark Tuesday.</p><p>Reagan required emergency surgery after he was shot by John Hinckley Jr. outside the Washington Hilton Hotel.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/auction_claims_to_be_selling_vial_of_reagan_blood/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/auction_claims_to_be_selling_vial_of_reagan_blood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals are not uniquely &#8220;unreasonable&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/26/liberals_are_not_uniquely_unreasonable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/26/liberals_are_not_uniquely_unreasonable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10259582</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A widely discussed critique of the left's attitude toward Obama forgets some important history]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By now, you’re probably familiar with Jonathan Chait’s provocatively titled New York magazine story: “<a href="http://nymag.com/news/politics/liberals-jonathan-chait-2011-11/">When Did Liberals Become So Unreasonable</a>?” Chait’s answer is that they’ve pretty much always been unreasonable – that the same “unceasingly despairing” attitude the left has taken toward Barack Obama’s presidency emerges whenever a Democrat claims the White House.</p><p>Of course, Chait is overstating the current depths of liberal despair, given that the outspoken frustration of some left-of-center commentators <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/25/left_obama_leverage/">hasn’t exactly trickled down to the liberal masses</a>, and that overall support and enthusiasm for Obama has <a href="http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/19/confidence-in-obama-and-in-the-economy-declines/">fallen more significantly among non-liberal Democrats</a> than among liberals. Joan Walsh <a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/23/should_liberals_be_more_thankful_for_obama/singleton/">did a nice job earlier this week</a> of pointing this out, and of addressing many of the specific points Chait made about Obama’s record.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/26/liberals_are_not_uniquely_unreasonable/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/26/liberals_are_not_uniquely_unreasonable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>122</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Iran-contra scandal, 25 years later</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/25/the_iran_contra_scandal_25_years_later/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/25/the_iran_contra_scandal_25_years_later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran-contra scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10259415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 1990s, U.S. prosecutors assessed "criminal liabilty" of Reagan, George H.W. Bush]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;"> It has been 25 years since President Ronald Reagan stepped up to the microphone in the White House press room and made the announcement that launched one of the greatest scandals in modern American politics.</p><p style="text-align: left;"> Reagan announced that his administration had sent “small amounts of defense weapons and spare parts to Iran” not to trade arms for hostages, but to improve relations and support moderate mullahs. There was “one aspect” of the operation that, the President said, he had been “unaware of.” His attorney general, Edwin Meese, then stepped forward to describe how “private benefactors” had transferred profits from those sales to counterrevolutionary forces, the contras, fighting to overthrow the Sandinista government in Nicaragua.  No U.S. officials were involved, according to Meese, in this “diversion” of funds that linked two seemingly separate covert operations.</p><p>The focus on the diversion, as Oliver North, the NSC staffer who supervised the two operations wrote in his memoir, <em>Under Fire</em>, was itself a diversion. “This particular detail was so dramatic, so sexy, that it might actually—well <em>divert</em> public attention from other, even more important aspects of the story,” North noted, “such as what the President and his top advisors had known about and approved.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/11/25/the_iran_contra_scandal_25_years_later/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/11/25/the_iran_contra_scandal_25_years_later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>50</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peggy Noonan, Reagan&#039;s storyteller, says Obama tells too many stories</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/noonan_obama_reagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/noonan_obama_reagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 15:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crafter of the Reagan Myth doesn\'t care for the president copying St. Ronald]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peggy Noonan <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/declarations.html">has diagnosed what is wrong with Barack Obama</a>: He is too concerned with "telling stories," and not concerned enough with "leading." And Noonan should know, because she was a professional writer of stories for Ronald Reagan, the American president whose entire legacy is built around the fact that he was really super good at telling stories.</p><p>Noonan has been out in the "real" part of the country talking to people and she sees "a kind of new patriotism among our professional class" and it inspires her, but back East, where the bad politicians live, people are too obsessed with "The Narrative," which she knows because she read Ron Suskind's book:</p><blockquote>
<p>Throughout the interview the president seems preoccupied with "shaping a story for the American people." He says: "The irony is, the reason I was in this office is because I told a story to the American people." But, he confesses, "that narrative thread we just lost" in his first years.</p>
<p>Then he asks, "What's the particular requirement of the president that no one else can do?" He answers: "What the president can do, that nobody else can do, is tell a story to the American people" about where we are as a nation and should be.</p>
<p>Tell a story to the American people? <em>That's</em> your job? Not adopting good policies? Not defending the nation? Storytelling?</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/noonan_obama_reagan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/30/noonan_obama_reagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama gets to play Ronald Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/21/what_would_reagan_do/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/21/what_would_reagan_do/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt ceiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2011/07/20/what_would_reagan_do</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He praised him on the campaign trail. Now he's channeling his ability to compromise. Why won't the GOP go along?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh/politics/2011/07/18/arianna_huffington_vs_frederick_douglass/index.html">President Obama invoked Abraham Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation</a> to point to the value of compromise in American politics. Now Democrats and Republicans are fighting over what Ronald Reagan might have done with the debt crisis. It's nothing new in American politics: In this country with a relatively short history politicians like to look backward at what their predecessors might have done. It's also rather useless &#8211; especially when both sides leave out key parts of the historical picture.</p><p>I already talked about what Obama left out of his Lincoln story. Complaining that in today's climate, unhappy progressives would even have attacked Lincoln's proclamation because it didn't free all the slaves, Obama ignored that some progressives of Lincoln's day did exactly that. Now Republicans are invoking Reagan as the great tax cutter, to argue that he would back their decision not to include any revenues or taxes in deals to raise the debt ceiling. Democrats correctly note that Reagan raised taxes 11 times, and raised the debt ceiling an astonishing 17 times. Even better for Democrats, he made a fiery speech attacking those in Congress who wanted to hold the debt ceiling hostage for "bringing the country to the edge of default before facing its responsibility."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/21/what_would_reagan_do/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/21/what_would_reagan_do/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The final nail in the supply side coffin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/the_final_nail_in_the_supply_side_coffin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/the_final_nail_in_the_supply_side_coffin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/07/06/the_final_nail_in_the_supply_side_coffin</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Broken recovery: Taxes are low and corporate profits are high, but nothing is trickling down to the American worker]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The theory of supply-side economics tells us that if you cut taxes on rich people and corporations, the newly liberated moguls and businessmen will take their windfall and invest it, creating jobs and accelerating the rate of economic growth. The benefits of a light hand on the upper class, therefore, will "trickle down" to the working man and woman.</p><p>Ever since Ronald Reagan first attempted to make supply-side economics a reality and proceeded to inaugurate an era of persistent government deficits and growing income inequality, it has become harder and harder to make the trickle-down argument with a straight face. But we've never seen anything quite like the disaster that's playing out right now.</p><p>The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702304760604576426153929429820.html?mod=WSJ_hp_LEFTTopStories">that corporate profits are looking quite strong</a> for the second quarter of 2011. Even the Journal can't sugarcoat the basic facts:</p><blockquote>
<p>While the U.S. economy staggers through one of its slowest recoveries since the Great Depression, American companies are poised to report strong earnings for the second quarter -- exposing a dichotomy between corporate performance and the overall health of the economy.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/the_final_nail_in_the_supply_side_coffin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/06/the_final_nail_in_the_supply_side_coffin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>310</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.K. receives giant Reagan statue to commemorate destructive austerity measures</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/reagan_london/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/reagan_london/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/05/reagan_london</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A million-dollar reminder of the Great Communicator's role in winning the class war for the rich]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After various millionaires and billionaires crashed the entire world economy, governments worldwide are imposing "austerity measures" designed to punish impoverished recipients of direct government aid and middle-class public employees for their crimes against the international economic consensus. ("Gubmint too big!!!" -The Economist.) In nations where trade unions are actually a major force for the rights of workers and not a depressing relic, there are massive protests. In Great Britain, a one-day strike brought <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/jun/30/more-than-10000-schools-affected">750,000 people to the streets.</a> Also, London just got an awesome, brand-new <a href="http://gawker.com/5817999/million+dollar-reagan-statue-unveiled-in-london">10-foot-tall statue of Ronald Reagan</a>!</p><p>The statue will "<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2011077/10ft-Ronald-Reagan-statue-unveiled-London.html?ITO=1490">stand alongside statues of other American presidents</a> such as Franklin D Roosevelt and Dwight D Eisenhower," a couple of guys who actually helped the U.K. survive a world war.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/reagan_london/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/05/reagan_london/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was John Lennon a secret Reaganite?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/john_lennon_ronald_reagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/john_lennon_ronald_reagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/06/29/john_lennon_ronald_reagan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rock icon's one-time assistant says yes, but the historical record suggests otherwise]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The right-leaning media is aflutter today with the news that, according to a one-time assistant to John Lennon, the rock icon in the final months of his life privately came out as a supporter of Ronald Reagan. But there's strong evidence that, despite the new claim, Lennon never abandoned his left-wing roots.</p><p>Here's what we know: The Toronto Sun <a href="http://www.torontosun.com/2011/06/28/lennon-was-a-closet-republican-assistant">reported</a> that the assistant, Fred Seaman, is quoted in a new documentary saying that, "John, basically, made it very clear that if he were an American he would vote for Reagan because he was really sour on [Democrat] Jimmy Carter." Seaman added:</p><blockquote>
<p>"He'd met Reagan back, I think, in the 70s at some sporting event... Reagan was the guy who had ordered the National Guard, I believe, to go after the young (peace) demonstrators in Berkeley, so I think that John maybe forgot about that... He did express support for Reagan, which shocked me.</p>
<p>"I also saw John embark in some really brutal arguments with my uncle, who's an old-time communist... He enjoyed really provoking my uncle... Maybe he was being provocative... but it was pretty obvious to me he had moved away from his earlier radicalism.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/john_lennon_ronald_reagan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/john_lennon_ronald_reagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>126</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tim Pawlenty&#8217;s Reagan amnesia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/tim_pawlenty_and_the_reagan_tax_cuts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/tim_pawlenty_and_the_reagan_tax_cuts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2011 19:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tim Pawlenty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/06/15/tim_pawlenty_and_the_reagan_tax_cuts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, the Gipper passed a big tax cut. But he also raised taxes -- just before the economy got going]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As closer and closer examinations of Republican presidential candidate <a href="http://www.offthechartsblog.org/pawlenty%E2%80%99s-high-end-tax-cuts-dwarf-even-those-of-president-bush/">Tim Pawlenty's radical tax cut agenda</a> continue to illustrate just how extraordinarily huge his handout to the richest Americans would be, it's probably worth recapitulating the severe problems that plague his tax-cuts-will-raise-revenue thesis. This is an exercise we've gone through before, but as long as Republicans running for President continue to repeat it, <a href="http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works/2011/04/21/the_great_republican_tax_cut_fantasy/index.html">we will continue to shoot it down.</a></p><p>On Monday, Slate's Dave Weigel <a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/weigel/archive/2011/06/13/pawlenty-bush-tax-cuts-didn-t-fully-serve-their-intended-purposes.aspx">captured Pawlenty's most recent obeisance</a> at the altar of Ronald Reagan.</p><blockquote>
<p>"When Ronald Reagan cut taxes in a significant way," said Pawlenty, "revenues actually increased by almost 100 percent during his eight years as president. So this idea that significant, big tax cuts necessarily result in lower revenues -- history does not [bear] that out."</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/tim_pawlenty_and_the_reagan_tax_cuts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/15/tim_pawlenty_and_the_reagan_tax_cuts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mike Huckabee will teach your children history</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/huckabee_history/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/huckabee_history/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 17:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Huckabee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/05/12/huckabee_history</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New cartoons promise to be this generation's "Schoolhouse Rock," except with 100 percent more right-wing propaganda]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do your children know enough about Ronald Reagan? If they attend a liberal public school, probably not! Thankfully, a charming theocrat talk show host and 2012 Republican presidential nomination front-runner is here to educate them, with cartoons. Mike Huckabee presents <a href="http://learnourhistory.com/">"Learn Our History,"</a> an edutaining look at the American story from World War II to Ronald Reagan. In fact, it consists solely of World War II and Ronald Reagan. (There is more coming, though! Up next is 9/11.)</p><p>I know this will be nearly impossible to believe, especially when the mugger in the "DISCO" shirt shows up less than 30 seconds in, <a href="http://tolbertreport.com/2011/05/11/huckabee-starts-kids-conservative-history-videos-company/">but this does not appear to be a joke:</a> <object style="height: 390px; width: 640px;"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/3BKDD3BDNHg?version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/3BKDD3BDNHg?version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/huckabee_history/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/12/huckabee_history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>81</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How David Koch tried to derail the Reagan revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/davoid_koch_reagan_walker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/davoid_koch_reagan_walker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/23/davoid_koch_reagan_walker</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The man who's now called "the Tea Party's wallet" almost helped Jimmy Carter win a second term]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Toward the end of <a href="http://motherjones.com/mojo/2011/02/scott-walker-koch-brother-crank-call-wisconsin">what seems to be</a> (but maybe isn't!) a secretly recorded phone conversation with a blogger pretending to be David Koch, Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker talks of gathering his Cabinet several weeks ago, pulling out a picture of Ronald Reagan, and likening the push to deny public sector workers collective bargaining rights to the Gipper's 1981 decision to fire striking air traffic controllers.</p><p>It was, the governor says, "one of the defining moments of his political career, not just his presidency."</p><p>There's some irony here.</p><p>Sure, Walker (probably) had no idea he was talking to an impersonator, but the simple fact that someone claiming to be David Koch could (apparently) reach him with such ease speaks to the stature Koch -- a billionaire tycoon <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/67285/">who has been called</a> "the Tea Party's wallet" -- now enjoys on the right. And to conservatives like Walker, Reagan is now regarded with god-like reverence. What Walker may not remember, though, is that the same David Koch he thought he was speaking with actually tried to derail the Reagan Revolution.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/davoid_koch_reagan_walker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/23/davoid_koch_reagan_walker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Observations from a day of watching CPAC on TV</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/cpac_in_review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/cpac_in_review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/10/cpac_in_review</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How Newt Gingrich balanced the budget, Reagan worship, Rick Santorum's odd music choice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/02/10/donald_trump_cpac/index.html">Unlike Justin Elliott</a>, I am not at CPAC. But I am watching it on C-Span.</p><p>Mitch McConnell, this morning: Opposing campaign finance reform was "like trying to get a deaf dog off a meat truck."</p><p>David Bossie: "There's only one man who can claim to have balanced the federal budget, and that's Newt Gingrich."</p><p>Newt Gingrich entered to "Eye of the Tiger." (I think he does this all the time, actually.) Then he compared the supposedly anti-job Obama administration unfavorably to ... the German government. You know, the one with the VAT and the high personal income taxes and the mass unionization. Gingrich then suggested replacing the EPA with the "Environmental Solutions Agency." (Maybe he thinks the "P" stands for "problems"?)</p><p>Then there was some sort of lengthy panel about Ronald Reagan. My favorite part was when a speaker began an anecdote by saying, "Ron Reagan Jr. -- don't boo ..." (Second-favorite part was when a guy said that Reagan "was even more tea party than Jefferson." He was more like the Founders than the actual Founders, themselves.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/cpac_in_review/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/10/cpac_in_review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP plan to lower gas prices: Bogus &#8217;80s nostalgia</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/gas_prices_republicans_and_ronald_reagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/gas_prices_republicans_and_ronald_reagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 17:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Republican takeover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2011/02/08/gas_prices_republicans_and_ronald_reagan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Republicans rewrite history to attack Obama's energy policy. Let's count the errors]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here's something to watch as <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/money_co/2011/02/gasoline-oil-prices-egypt.html">U.S. gas prices continue to rise</a> to points not seen since the height of the financial crisis: Republicans busily rewriting history in a tired effort to prove that an unregulated free market is the answer to all our energy woes. The last time oil prices spiked, Democrats controlled both the House and Senate, so the long-standing GOP penchant for revisionism had no practical impact. But now Republicans are back in power in the House, and the wayback machine is revving up.</p><p>For example: <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/83010/hes-been-living-in-his-upton-world">Jon Chait</a> flags <a href="http://detnews.com/article/20110205/MIVIEW/102050384/Upton--The-Gipper-s-energy-lesson#ixzz1DNvO7oVe">an encomium to the glory days</a> of Ronald Reagan's energy policy, written by the new chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Fred Upton, that enormously misrepresents what actually happened. Let's take a closer look:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/gas_prices_republicans_and_ronald_reagan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/gas_prices_republicans_and_ronald_reagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Reaganism actually started with Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/lind_reaganism_carter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/lind_reaganism_carter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jimmy Carter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/08/lind_reaganism_carter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Think Reagan was the first modern president to preach low taxes, free markets and morality?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hundredth anniversary of Ronald Reagan's birth has produced disagreement over his policies among conservatives and liberals, but agreement on one point: Reagan's presidency marked the end of one era in American politics and the beginning of a new one. An epochal shift indeed took place -- but it happened in 1976, not 1980. The Age of Reagan should be called the Age of Carter, in politics and policy alike.</p><p>In politics, both Carter and Reagan sought to exploit the "white backlash" in the aftermath of the civil rights revolution that had led many white Southerners and white Northern "ethnics" to defect from the Democrats to support third-party populist candidate George Wallace. Reagan did so by beginning his general election campaign in 1980 in Neshoba County, Miss., where white supremacists had recently fire-bombed a black church and had earlier murdered three Northern civil rights activists, Andrew Goodman, Michael Schwerner, and James Chaney. In a thinly disguised appeal to white Southern racism, Reagan declared, "I believe in states' rights."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/lind_reaganism_carter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/08/lind_reaganism_carter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When Reagan was (much) less popular than Carter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/06/will_bunch_reagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/06/will_bunch_reagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Real Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/06/will_bunch_reagan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Bunch, author of "Tear Down This Myth," explains how the Gipper was transformed into a conservative demigod]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By 1992, three years after he left the White House, Ronald Reagan was anything but a beloved former president. As a painful recession gripped the country, the public came to see the Reagan years -- which featured a massive defense buildup, soaring deficits and even a stock market crash in 1987 -- as the source of their economic woes. Running for president that year, Bill Clinton promised to enact a clean break from the "failed policies of Reagan and Bush." As Reagan prepared to speak at the Republican National Convention in August, a Gallup poll found that just 46 percent of Americans had a favorable view of him. By contrast, Jimmy Carter, the man Reagan had defeated in a 44-state rout in 1980, was viewed favorably by 63 percent of the American public. The Reagan presidency stood in something approaching disrepute.</p><p>Today, though, you'd never know any of this happened. In the two decades since it bottomed out, Reagan's image has been resurrected, thanks largely to a relentless campaign from conservative activists. Will Bunch, who writes for the Philadelphia Daily News and is a senior fellow at Media Matters, chronicled Reagan's image makeover -- and the reality of his record as president -- in his 2008 book "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/Backlash-Right-Wing-Radicals-High-Def-Hucksters/dp/0061991716/ref=sr_1_2?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1276486818&amp;sr=1-2">Tear Down This Myth</a>." We spoke with him recently about how the myth of Reagan has taken hold, and whether there's any truth to it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/06/will_bunch_reagan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/06/will_bunch_reagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cheney to speak at Reagan centennial</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/05/us_reagan_cheney/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/05/us_reagan_cheney/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 20:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Cheney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/02/05/us_reagan_cheney</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former V.P. will commemorate the former president's influence]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Vice President Dick Cheney is scheduled to speak in California to commemorate the centennial of President Ronald Reagan's birth.</p><p>His appearance Saturday night comes as conservatives are newly energized, after elections last year in which Republicans gained ground in Congress and in many statehouses around the county.</p><p>Cheney, who had broad influence in George W. Bush's White House, has heckled the Obama administration at many turns and has predicted President Barack Obama will be a one-term president.</p><p>The group sponsoring the event -- the conservative Young America's Foundation -- was founded to promote conservative ideas on college campuses and purchased Reagan's former ranch in 1998.</p><p>Sarah Palin addressed the group Friday.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/05/us_reagan_cheney/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/05/us_reagan_cheney/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin is a soap opera, says Ron Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/sarah_palin_ronald_reagan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/sarah_palin_ronald_reagan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/02/04/sarah_palin_ronald_reagan</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Son of the former president speaks out about Palin's scheduled speech at a birthday tribute to his father]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah Palin is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/03/ronald-reagan-centennial-_n_818344.html">scheduled</a> to speak at a tribute to former President Ronald Reagan today, whose 100th birthday would have been this Sunday.</p><p>Not all are fans of the governor turned vice-presidential candidate, most notably Reagan's son, Ron Reagan. He <a href="http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_16026/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=YimCRnez">told</a> the Associated Press that he sees nothing in common between his father and Palin.</p><blockquote>
<p>Sarah Palin is a soap opera, basically. She's doing mostly what she does to make money and keep her name in the news. She is not a serious candidate for president and never has been.</p>
</blockquote><p>Reagan's former speechwriter, Kenneth Khachigian, praised the choice of Palin to honor the 40th president, saying Palin's philosophy and political fortunes were shaped by the Reagan presidency. "She can reflect on that as well as anyone could," he <a href="http://m.apnews.com/ap/db_16026/contentdetail.htm?contentguid=YimCRnez">said</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/sarah_palin_ronald_reagan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/sarah_palin_ronald_reagan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gingrich cashes in on Reagan centennial</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/newt_cashes_in_reagan_centennial/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/newt_cashes_in_reagan_centennial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/04/newt_cashes_in_reagan_centennial</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich is selling two books and one DVD commemorating Ronald Reagan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Newt Gingrich was asked about getting into the 2012 presidential race at a public forum the other night, he responded:&#160;"I'm an author. I write books. I make money."</p><p>That comment comes as no surprise to regular War Room readers; we've spent a fair <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/12/08/newt_gingrich_holidays">amount of time</a> documenting the former speaker's relentless merchandising. His ex-wife memorably <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/08/10/marianne_gingrich_on_newt_gingrich/index.html">told</a> Esquire that she doesn't think Gingrich will ever mount a presidential bid because he's too busy getting rich selling junk to the conservative masses.&#160;</p><p>So it's perhaps the least surprising development of the week that Gingrich is attempting to profit off of the Reagan centennial, which is sure to be a cash cow for conservative publishers and moviemakers.</p><p>Gingrich is going all out. He and his ever-present wife, Callista, wrote the foreword to a new coffee table <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Ronald-Reagan-David-Elliot-Cohen/dp/1402780575">volume</a>, "Ronald Reagan: A Life in Photographs."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/newt_cashes_in_reagan_centennial/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/newt_cashes_in_reagan_centennial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We fought a war on lies, and lies won</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/reagan_war_on_poverty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/reagan_war_on_poverty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Real Reagan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2011/02/04/reagan_war_on_poverty</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Trashing the War on Poverty, Reagan destroyed the social compact that built the postwar American dream]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ronald Reagan gave America so many pretty sayings, but when it comes to social equality, he'll go down in history for his lyrical lie, "The federal government declared a war on poverty, and poverty won." (He said it many times, many ways; that exact quote is from his <a href="http://janda.org/politxts/State%20of%20Union%20Addresses/1981-1988%20Reagan/rwr88.html">1988 State of the Union address.)</a></p><p>Of course, Reagan was wrong. Poverty declined sharply after the war on poverty commenced. According to the Institute for Research on Poverty, in 1959 the individual poverty rate was 22 percent. It hovered there until about 1964, when it began to drop; by 1973, it was 11 percent. Then it began to climb again, to 15 percent in 1983. Thanks to the economic boom at the end of Reagan's tenure, it dropped by about a point, and then jumped back to 15 percent by the time President Clinton took office. Under Clinton, it fell to 11 percent. Under George W. Bush, it climbed back over 14 percent, and it has continued to inch upward under Barack Obama.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/reagan_war_on_poverty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/reagan_war_on_poverty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>110</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The scandal that almost destroyed Ronald Reagan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/busby_iran_contra/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/busby_iran_contra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Real Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/03/busby_iran_contra</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["We did not -- repeat -- did not trade weapons or anything else for hostages. Nor will we"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Nov. 13, 1986, President Reagan declared in a national address, "We did not -- repeat -- did not trade weapons or anything else for hostages -- nor will we." His assertion ran counter to covert operations that had been ongoing for several years. Reagan was faced with an uncomfortable question, transposed from the Watergate scandal, which threatened to strike at his credibility. What did the president know and when did he know it? Having secured a landslide win against Walter Mondale in 1984, Reagan&#8217;s second term appeared to be one in which the Cold War, arms control and relations with the Soviet Union would dominate the presidential agenda. Instead, Reagan found himself in the midst of a crisis that threatened his presidency.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/busby_iran_contra/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/04/busby_iran_contra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

