<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Rush Limbaugh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/rush_limbaugh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:16:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Resolved: In 2013, I&#8217;ll stop paying attention to Rush</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/resolved_in_2013_ill_stop_paying_attention_to_rush/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/resolved_in_2013_ill_stop_paying_attention_to_rush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, I'll exercise more, stop using emoticons and cancel cable. Well, we'll see about those...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've never been one for New Years resolutions, but, then, I've never been a father before, either. That means up until now, the symptoms of my early onset Old Jewish Man Syndrome -- anxiety, neurosis, self-hate and attendant gastrointestinal distress -- mostly affected just me, and not a small child. So I figure if there's a first time for everything, then 2013 is as good a year as any to come up with 10 resolutions that, if fulfilled, hold out the hope of making me a better and healthier dad, husband, writer and overall person.</p><p>Some of these will seem trivial, and others will seem more serious. My guess is that at least a few will ring true for you - and if they don't, well, at least you can have a good laugh at my expense. Here they are in no specific order:</p><p><strong>1. I will stop lying to my exercise machine:</strong> When it comes to my relationship with workout machines, I am nothing short of a pathological liar. Whether at home or on vacation, I tell the machines I meet that I weigh 173 pounds when I really weigh about 10 pounds more than that. In other words, when I program my workout, I tell the machine I'm the weight I want to be, but not the weight I actually am. Why do I do this and what the hell do I really think I'm getting away with?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/resolved_in_2013_ill_stop_paying_attention_to_rush/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/resolved_in_2013_ill_stop_paying_attention_to_rush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even more Limbaugh madness</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/even_more_limbaugh_madness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/even_more_limbaugh_madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: The NRA is classy! Liberal culture is to blame for Newtown! Even more from Rush's radio broadcast today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, Rush Limbuagh <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/limbaugh_nras_lapierre_the_adult_in_gun_control_debate/">praised</a> the NRA's Wayne LaPierre as the "adult" in the gun control debate today, after his surreal press conference which called for armed guards in every school in the country.</p><p>But he didn't stop there.</p><p>We<a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/12/21/wayne_lapierre_calls_out_the_media"> tracked down</a> Rush's most inflammatory statements so you don't have to listen:</p><p>* "The NRA was very classy and laid back for a week. They didn't say anything, didn't get involved, didn't attempt to exploit it one way or another. They are the greatest, the largest gun safety organization in the country."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/even_more_limbaugh_madness/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/even_more_limbaugh_madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh: NRA&#8217;s LaPierre the adult in gun control debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/limbaugh_nras_lapierre_the_adult_in_gun_control_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/limbaugh_nras_lapierre_the_adult_in_gun_control_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 19:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wayne LaPierre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newtown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a radio rant as wild as the NRA chief's press conference, Rush blames the liberal media for, well, everything]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne LaPierre finally has someone who will defend him.</p><p><a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/12/21/don_t_blame_me_for_plan_b_debacle">Surprise, it's Rush Limbaugh.</a></p><p>On his radio show this afternoon, Limbaugh called the NRA leader "an adult looking for real solutions," and said he was "disrespected" by Code Pink protesters who, he claimed, would never interrupt a hearing on Benghazi.</p><p>"No matter what he said, Wayne LaPierre sounded like an adult looking for real solutions, but that's not what this country's interested in right now. Sorry. The adults are not running this show," said Limbaugh.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/limbaugh_nras_lapierre_the_adult_in_gun_control_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/limbaugh_nras_lapierre_the_adult_in_gun_control_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh: Maybe the Mayan apocalypse made Adam Lanza do it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/limbaugh_maybe_the_mayan_apocalypse_made_adam_lanza_do_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/limbaugh_maybe_the_mayan_apocalypse_made_adam_lanza_do_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 15:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Lanza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mayan apocalypse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13150812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush "bounces off" the silliest Newtown theory yet: Blame it on the looming end of the world]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh advanced <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/how_feminism_caused_sandy_hook_according_to_the_right/">another</a> wacky Adam Lanza theory Thursday: the end of the world made him do it.</p><p>As Rush <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/12/19/quick_hits_page">details</a> on his web site, Lanza -- whose mother, Nancy, was reportedly a doomsday "prepper" -- either couldn't deal with the possibility of the Mayan apocalypse on Friday or wanted to "save people" from it.</p><p>As he <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/12/19/quick_hits_page">pushed this theory,</a> Limbaugh had it both ways. "I'm not espousing it, I just want to bounce off of it." Here's how he bounced:</p><blockquote><p>The theory that Adam Lanza somehow had been convinced the world was gonna end Friday and he was discombobulated by it. His mother was a prepper and a survivalist and showed him guns and he went in there and did what he did to either deal with the pressure of it or maybe save people from the end, who knows what.  It happened in China, is the point.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/limbaugh_maybe_the_mayan_apocalypse_made_adam_lanza_do_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/limbaugh_maybe_the_mayan_apocalypse_made_adam_lanza_do_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why can Limbaugh speak, but not Costas?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/why_can_limbaugh_speak_but_not_costas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/why_can_limbaugh_speak_but_not_costas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob Costas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kanye West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives get outraged when a celebrity talks politics, as long as it's not one of their "expert" entertainers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One way to understand Bob Costas' <a href="http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/tv/showtracker/la-et-st-bob-costas-gun-control-jovan-belcher-20121203,0,4037011.story">comments</a> about gun violence during halftime of NBC's Sunday evening football game is to interpret them as yet another example of media self-absorption. And in fact, by turning a horrific story of domestic violence and suicide into a cheap story about the overwrought reaction to a professional commentator, the national press did proudly fulfill the timeless jeremiad of "Broadcast News" to "never forget (that) we're the real story, not them."</p><p>But as repulsive and predictable as that narcissism is, it did inadvertently spotlight a significant problem plaguing our civic discourse. Call it Shut Up and Sing Syndrome.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/why_can_limbaugh_speak_but_not_costas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/why_can_limbaugh_speak_but_not_costas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP civil war: Limbaugh vs. the consultants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/gop_civil_war_limbaugh_vs_the_consultants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/gop_civil_war_limbaugh_vs_the_consultants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP Civil War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13104727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A top Republican strategist calls conservatives "loons and wackos." Limbaugh is not pleased]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last time we checked in with the post-election GOP civil war, Herman Cain was threatening to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/gop_civil_war_herman_cain_calls_for_3rd_party/">form a new party</a> to compete with the GOP, Bill Kristol <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/how_bill_kristol_could_split_the_gop_in_two/">sparked a schism</a> over tax increases, and Grover Norquist, the high priest of anti-tax dogma, was <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/grover_norquist_is_not_making_sense/">losing his grip</a> on congressional Republicans.</p><p>This week, the Republican soul searching and polite recriminations via anonymous quote exploded into an all-out war of words between representatives of two wings of the party that have never gotten along, but largely kept quiet for the good of the conservative cause.</p><p>In one corner are the consultants, Steve Schmidt, who managed John McCain’s 2008 campaign, and Mike Murphy, who advised Mitt Romney. In the other corner is Rush Limbaugh, the embodiment of the conservative id in human form. We don’t have a dog in this fight as there’s blood on both of their hands, so just sit back and enjoy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/gop_civil_war_limbaugh_vs_the_consultants/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/21/gop_civil_war_limbaugh_vs_the_consultants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Victory for strangers, heathens, wastrels!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American History]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill O'Reilly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Class warfare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13101030</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans counted on tried-and-true class warfare like never before. This time, "outsiders" were the majority]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before we get to the persistence of class warfare in our politics, let’s talk about Skinch Painter. In 1900, when the San Francisco Examiner tracked him down, he was 78, “hale, hearty, and contented.” He hadn’t inherited a penny, but neither had he worked a day in his life. “He has never borrowed a dollar, nor stolen one,” the column read. “He has never been a tramp nor a beggar. He has never done a day’s work in exchange for money ... Yet he has lived.”</p><p>One day, when he was in his teens, he said to himself, “Look here, Skinch Painter, this old world owes you a living, and all you’ve got to do is collect it.” Wandering the Ozarks of Missouri, he inhabited a cave and relied on nature for his food and clothing. He hunted, fished and gathered nuts and berries, wearing only animal skins and going barefoot.</p><p>“Labor is a useless sin,” said Skinch. “The time a man spends working is just so much time lost from living.”</p><p>We can just about see Fox News sending a camera crew out to interview Skinch, and one of its handsomely paid straight men wrapping up the piece with an offhand, “See, you don’t need government handouts. If you don’t want to work, you can do what this guy does. At least he’s not a taker. The rest of us in this country, we’ll continue to work for a living.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/18/victory_for_strangers_heathens_wastrels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Bill Kristol could split the GOP in two</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/how_bill_kristol_could_split_the_gop_in_two/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/how_bill_kristol_could_split_the_gop_in_two/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Kristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George H.W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The influential conservative's call for a tax hike on the rich risks re-launching the Republican civil war of 1990]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest news on Sunday was Bill Kristol’s <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/sunday_best_gop_open_to_raising_taxes/">declaration</a> on “Fox News Sunday” that Republicans should give in on President Obama’s demand that tax rates go up on income over $250,000 as part of any fiscal “<a href="http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-cycle/49749182">cliff</a>” deal.</p><p>“It won’t kill the country if we raise taxes a little bit on millionaires,” he said. “It really won’t, I don’t think. I don’t really understand why Republicans don’t take Obama’s offer.”</p><p>As Alex Seitz-Wald <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/sunday_best_gop_open_to_raising_taxes/">explained yesterday</a>, this is a potentially huge development. For more than two decades now, the Republican Party has been absolutely, unanimously opposed to income tax hikes. This might just be Kristol speaking for Kristol and no one else, but if his words signal – or trigger – an actual shift within the party, the policy consequences will be serious. It could also set off an intraparty civil war.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/how_bill_kristol_could_split_the_gop_in_two/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/how_bill_kristol_could_split_the_gop_in_two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the conservative media killing conservatives?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/is_the_conservative_media_killing_conservatives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/is_the_conservative_media_killing_conservatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2012 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nate Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Republicans perform a full autopsy on the 2012 elections, they'll realize they only deluded themselves]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/10/TAP_new_logo6.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> Liberals like me have spent a lot of time in recent years mocking conservatives for the silliness of their media, wherein Steve Doocy is a star, Sean Hannity is an insightful analyst, and Rush Limbaugh is a brave crusader for truth. Beyond the jokes, we've talked a lot about the pathologies produced by the self-reinforcing worldviews propagated in the conservative media ether. One of the key features of those media, and what differentiates them from partisan left media, is the way they talk about the <em>rest</em> of the media. Liberals may like to watch MSNBC, but if you watch MSNBC you won't be reminded ten times an hour that everything you see in your newspaper or on another television station is a vicious lie concocted by conservatives to deceive you as part of their plan to destroy the country you love.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/is_the_conservative_media_killing_conservatives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/10/is_the_conservative_media_killing_conservatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;I&#8217;ve never been more hopeful&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 01:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vermont]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy's]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liveblog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Early voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kentucky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graphic Novel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dirty tricks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Panthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[108 year old first voter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exit Poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exit Polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Rolls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peru]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Panther]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robo-calls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robocalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Mourdock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virginia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rick Santorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kenya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beyonce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indiana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voter Fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay-Z]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ohio]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13063343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Liveblog: The president eloquently accepts a second term of office -- and vows to build on the progress we've made]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you seeing and hearing in your state and at the polling place? Send information and photos to readermail@salon.com.</p><p>[liveblog id=38]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/07/election_day_liveblog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Cusack to play Rush Limbaugh in new biopic</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/john_cusack_to_play_rush_limbaugh_in_new_biopic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/john_cusack_to_play_rush_limbaugh_in_new_biopic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2012 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Cusack]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Outspoken liberal to play outspoken conservative in new film -- production will begin next year]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actor and outspoken liberal John Cusack is developing a movie about conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh.</p><p>The working title is "Rush," Cusack's New Crime Productions confirmed, offering no other details.</p><p>Hollywood director Betty Thomas, who's set to work on the film, said the production company is putting finishing touches on a script that will star the actor. Production is set for next year, Thomas said.</p><p>Limbaugh is in the front ranks of colorful and provocative media figures. Earlier this year, Limbaugh called a Georgetown law student a "slut" and a "prostitute" on air for arguing to Democrats in Congress that health plans should pay for contraception.</p><p>This week, the host mocked Republican New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie for his "bromance" with Obama after Christie praised the president's response to the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy.</p><p>Cusack as Limbaugh isn't typecasting, politics aside. Cusack is a slender, dark-haired 46-year-old, while Limbaugh is 61, balding and portly. But Hollywood's makeup experts have probably had greater challenges.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/john_cusack_to_play_rush_limbaugh_in_new_biopic/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/05/john_cusack_to_play_rush_limbaugh_in_new_biopic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rush: Christie is Obama&#8217;s &#8220;Greek column&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/rush_christie_is_obamas_greek_column/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/rush_christie_is_obamas_greek_column/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13059111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So much for the love affair between the New Jersey governor and the right wing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The inimitable talk show host slammed the former conservative hero. It looks like Chris Christie can't count on El Rushbo's support if the governor is just a jerk some of the time:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ghH9Cl-Pj60" frameborder="0" width="400" height="300"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/rush_christie_is_obamas_greek_column/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/31/rush_christie_is_obamas_greek_column/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP&#8217;s new punching bag</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/why_does_the_right_hate_stephanie_cutter_so_much/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/why_does_the_right_hate_stephanie_cutter_so_much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presidential Election 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephanie Cutter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13048634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Political aides can expect to take their lumps, but the attacks on Stephanie Cutter are completely unhinged]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top political aides on any presidential campaign are bound to end up in the line of fire on occasion. But no official on either side of the aisle has taken more heat this year from blogs and pundits than Stephanie Cutter, Obama's deputy campaign director.</p><p>According to <a href="http://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=stephanie%20cutter%2C%20david%20axelrod%2C%20david%20plouffe%2C%20andrea%20saul%2C%20eric%20ferhnstrom&amp;geo=US&amp;date=today%203-m&amp;cmpt=q">Google Trends</a>, Cutter has been more searched than top Obama aides David Axelrod or David Plouffe, despite their relative seniority. Among the top searches for her are "married" and "husband," Axelrod is mostly sought out by people looking for his Twitter handle. And while Axelrod and Plouffe catch plenty of flak from the right, unlike her male colleagues, Cutter's attacks are often personal and vicious, occasionally with gendered undertones.</p><p>According to a Romney aide anonymously quoted by BuzzFeed this summer, Cutter is "some hack political adviser from Chicago who <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/mckaycoppins/how-the-romney-campaign-decided-to-take-the-gloves">has nothing to point to in her own life</a>." The comment came during a row over Cutter's factually accurate claim that Romney could have committed a felony by filing conflicting reports with two government agencies about when he left Bain Capital. Why the aide had to suggest Cutter's life is pointless to respond to a factual claim is unclear.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/why_does_the_right_hate_stephanie_cutter_so_much/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/why_does_the_right_hate_stephanie_cutter_so_much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ten of the right&#8217;s craziest election conspiracies</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/ten_of_the_rights_craziest_election_conspiracies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/ten_of_the_rights_craziest_election_conspiracies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 13:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polls]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13034565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The closer we get to November 6, the nuttier the theories become. A look at some of the right's finest moments]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lengths to which our conservative establishment goes to bury Obama in mud often resemble D-Movie spy plots that set new standards for implausibility.</p><p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> The frequency and outlandishness of their conspiratorial imaginations grows in sync with their desperation. With Obama leading in most polls and the election season drawing to a close, it seems like a good time to recap some of the more ludicrous conspiracies hatched by our conservative fearmongers. So with our tin-foil hats securely strapped on, let's  venture down the primrose path of hair-raising hypotheses.</p><p><strong>1. Cooking the Unemployment Rate</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/ten_of_the_rights_craziest_election_conspiracies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/09/ten_of_the_rights_craziest_election_conspiracies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can anyone save the GOP?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/can_anyone_save_the_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/can_anyone_save_the_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13025242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Mitt, Republicans will need a sane leader to drag them back to reality. Problem is, they don't do sane]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the Republican Party face an impossible Catch-22 when it comes to excising the crazy from their party? This is a party, after all, that has numerous candidates who are running for office on a platform of ending the direct election of senators. It's a party whose most <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/06/rush_limbaugh_and_the_poisoning_of_the_gop_brand/">prominent voice in the media</a> goes around calling women “sluts,” and one with a Senate candidate who <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/todd_akin/">talks nonsense about the biology of rape</a>. Most notably, it's a party with a presidential candidate who simply parrots back the party’s conventional wisdom (47 percent!) -- and who <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/27/romneys_campaign_approaching_self_parody/">sounds totally out of touch and not a little insulting</a> to most voters. So what’s next?</p><p>Indeed, with Mitt Romney falling behind in the polls, there’s been a fair amount of speculation this week about the effects of a Romney loss on the Republican Party. The Hotline’s Reid Wilson <a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/politics/n2k-presidential-romney-loss-would-intensify-internal-gop-struggles-20120927">concluded,</a> for example, that "the fallout from a Romney loss has the potential to reverberate through the Republican Party for a decade" by pushing the GOP further and further away from moderate, voter-friendly positions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/can_anyone_save_the_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/can_anyone_save_the_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>41</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No, really: Penises are not shrinking</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/no_really_penises_are_not_shrinking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/no_really_penises_are_not_shrinking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh penis size]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13023919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh is wrong about that. But here's the long (and short) of what science really does tell us about size]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m often struck by the different ways we talk -- and don’t talk -- about men’s and women’s genitals. Recently, when women’s reproductive parts have made the news at all, it’s been in regard to political attempts to control what happens to women’s bodies (via policies related to <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/birth_control/">contraception</a>, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/02/22/a_pro_choice_win_in_virginia_assisted_by_saturday_night_live/singleton/">transvaginal ultrasounds</a> or “<a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/legitimate_rape/">legitimate rape</a>”).</p><p>But the politics of penis size? It’s forever about size.</p><p>Days ago, a new (and, I think, seriously flawed) <a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2012.02917.x/abstract">study</a> published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine claims – as its title says – “Women Who Prefer Longer Penises Are More Likely to Have Vaginal Orgasms (but Not Clitoral Orgasms).” Those who take the time to read the full study, however, will find that penis size doesn’t seem to be terribly important to women’s orgasms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/no_really_penises_are_not_shrinking/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/no_really_penises_are_not_shrinking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blame Fox News, not Mitt</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/blame_fox_not_mitt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/blame_fox_not_mitt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clint Eastwood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13018769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Romney's run an awful campaign. But his real problem is most Americans reject the Fox News/Limbaugh fairy tale]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m still more hesitant to accept the post-convention polling than almost anyone, but suppose that Barack Obama has in fact pulled out to a solid three- or four-point lead over Mitt Romney. Is it because of the Romney campaign's mistakes? We’ve certainly seen several: a generally lackluster convention capped off by the Clint Eastwood moment (great TV, but almost certainly a wasted moment as far as electioneering goes), a reaction to events in the Middle East that was widely panned, and the “47 percent” tape.</p><p>Greg Sargent <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/romney-is-losing-the-argument-over-the-economy/2012/09/20/08251ad2-033b-11e2-91e7-2962c74e7738_blog.html">makes the excellent point</a> this week that part of what’s happening is that Obama has pulled even or ahead with Romney on the question of who would do a better job on the economy, partly because a lot of people still blame George W. Bush for creating these economic problems but also because a lot of people are newly optimistic about the current economy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/blame_fox_not_mitt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/22/blame_fox_not_mitt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>179</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rush: Feminism shrinks penises</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/rush_feminism_shrinks_penises/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/rush_feminism_shrinks_penises/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 11:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Matters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genitalia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13017856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A study finds male genitalia has gotten smaller and the radio host knows who to blame]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh characteristically stressed the power and importance of feminism on his Thursday show. The firebrand host attributed to feminists ("feminazis" as he puts it) the power to determine the size of male genitalia.</p><p>An Italian study found that penises are on average around 10 percent smaller today than 50 years ago. The study cited weight gain, pollution, stress and smoking as possible factors in the shrinkage, but Rush suggests otherwise.</p><p>Scoffing at the idea that air pollution might influence our physical constitution, he stated, “I think it’s feminism... it’s tied to the last 50 years — the average size of [a male's] member is 10 percent smaller than 50 years — it has to be the feminazis, the chickification and everything else.”</p><p>Listen to the audio, via Media Matters:</p><p><iframe src="http://mediamatters.org/embed/190034" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="480" height="360"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/rush_feminism_shrinks_penises/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/21/rush_feminism_shrinks_penises/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>91</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh: Al-Qaida &#8220;gave up Osama&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/limbaugh_al_qaida_gave_up_osama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/limbaugh_al_qaida_gave_up_osama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 14:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libya embassy attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al-Qaida]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13010254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He says the terrorist group wanted to "mak[e] Obama look good" so he would remain in the White House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polite and serious pundits were <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/09/12/1130757/-Halperin-Romney-Statement-Craven-and-Ill-Advised">shocked</a> when Mitt Romney suggested, and RNC Chairman Reince Priebus outright declared, that President Obama "sympathized" with those who killed American diplomats in Libya. But anyone familiar with the <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/12/mitt%E2%80%99s_shameful_libya_statement/">alternative universe</a> version of Obama created by the right shouldn't be too surprised. As TPM's Josh Marshall <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2012/09/when_you_learn_theyre_not_ready.php">wrote</a>, the charge was "picked wholesale from the right-wing blogosphere."</p><p>It's now taken for granted on the far right that the statement issued by the U.S. Embassy in Cairo condemning the anti-Islamic film that sparked the violence (which was expressly not authorized by the Obama administration) is tantamount to "<a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2012/09/13/foxs-steve-doocy-the-us-embassy-in-cairo-was-es/189866">apologizing to Al-Qaida</a>," as Fox News host Steve Doocy said this morning. But for those prone to believe Obama is a secret Muslim radical, or at least feckless enough to sympathize with them, there's always been that one key bit of evidence that even a heavy does of cognitive dissonance can't ignore -- Obama authorized the mission that killed bin Laden.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/limbaugh_al_qaida_gave_up_osama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/13/limbaugh_al_qaida_gave_up_osama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quote of the day: Exit right</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/quote_of_the_day_exit_right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/quote_of_the_day_exit_right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2012 21:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quote of the day]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13008472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh's doom and gloom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh<a href="http://www.mediaite.com/online/rush-limbaugh-predicts-end-of-republican-party-if-obama-wins-re-election/"> predicted</a> big problems for conservatives -- and economic collapse within 18 months -- if Romney loses in November.</p><p>"If Obama wins, it’s the end of the Republican Party,” he said.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/quote_of_the_day_exit_right/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/11/quote_of_the_day_exit_right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>