<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Rush Limbaugh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/rush_limbaugh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 22:35:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh: No one willing to impeach the first black president</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impeachment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reince Priebus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303833</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush announced on Monday that Obama is not in "any jeopardy" of impeachment -- but only because he is black ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh announced on Monday that President Obama won't be <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/impeach_obama_again/" target="_blank">impeached</a> over recent controversies and that "Benghazi is not going to touch" him. And no, it's not because the talking points "<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/two_scandals_deflated_one_persists/" target="_blank">scandal</a>" wasn't really, you know, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/two_scandals_deflated_one_persists/" target="_blank">scandalous</a>, or that the Republican National Committee Chair Reince Priebus told impeachment-happy members of Congress to <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/rnc_chair_dont_call_for_impeachment_without_evidence/" target="_blank">cool it until they have evidence</a> to support their claims or any other reasons that are based in reality.</p><p>It's because Obama is black, and "the American people are not going to tolerate the first black president being removed from office," according to Limbaugh.</p><p><iframe src="http://mediamatters.org/embed/194156" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="480" height="360"></iframe></p><p>h/t <a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/05/20/limbaugh-obama-wont-be-removed-from-office-beca/194156" target="_blank">Media Matters</a></p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/limbaugh_no_one_willing_to_impeach_the_first_black_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conspiracy theorists flummoxed in face of actual scandals</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/conspiracy_theorists_flummoxed_in_face_of_actual_scandals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/conspiracy_theorists_flummoxed_in_face_of_actual_scandals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michele Bachmann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conspiracy theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Operation Fast and Furious]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Benghazi/IRS/AP trifecta was the moment critics of Obama and the government had been waiting for. Or was it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p dir="ltr">If you spend every hour of your working life inventing new ways to attack Barack Obama or the government (or both), this is <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/must_see_morning_clip_irs_targeted_conservative_groups/">a very good week for you</a> -- or at least it should be. After trudging through the deserts of Benghazi and Fast and Furious for four years, trying to extract any tiny drop of scandal from stone, now suddenly comes manna from heaven, courtesy of the IRS and its misguided attempt to prevent political groups from taking advantage of the nonprofit tax code. Then, even before you could digest the first course, the Department of Justice snoops on reporters. Glory be to Ronald Reagan’s ghost! <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/which_obama_scandal_will_inevitably_lead_to_his_impeachment/singleton/">The Promised Land of Impeachment </a>can’t be far off.</p><p dir="ltr">Three scandals, one week? It’s almost too good to be true. What if it is?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/conspiracy_theorists_flummoxed_in_face_of_actual_scandals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/15/conspiracy_theorists_flummoxed_in_face_of_actual_scandals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>181</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Return of the anti-Muslim bigots</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/return_of_the_anti_muslim_bigots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/return_of_the_anti_muslim_bigots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tunisia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bangladesh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palestine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peter King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Walsh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ann Coulter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As the GOP coalition gets frayed, Islamophobia is one of the few things that can unify the party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"These are not the droids you're looking for." One reason that Obi Wan Kenobi quote is so well known and so often invoked with a wink is because it succinctly captures American politics' most favorite bait and switch: the tactic whereby partisans deny the existence of a phenomenon that's there for everyone to see, all so that the phenomenon can continue unabated. This "Star Wars"-ism, indeed, is a perfect way to understand the way Islamophobia works in America, and not because of Tatooine's Arabian aesthetic (it was filmed in Tunisia), but because the way so many seem intent on pretending anti-Muslim sentiment doesn't exist, all to make sure it continues to flourish.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/return_of_the_anti_muslim_bigots/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/return_of_the_anti_muslim_bigots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>200</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Limbaugh finished?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/is_limbaugh_finished_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/is_limbaugh_finished_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 17:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Business Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cumulus media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The shock jock's ongoing feud with Cumulus Media suggests his divisive schtick may finally be wearing thin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ibtimes.com/.com"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2013/03/logo_300x501-e1364224707606.png" alt="International Business Times" align="left" /></a> The declining influence of Rush Limbaugh has been a topic of discussion for some time now; for so long, in fact, that there's little left to discuss. Throughout the presidential election last year, if he was talked about at all, it was mostly in the context of how poisonous his divisive shtick has become to the Republican Party. That’s a far cry from the early 1990s, when the radio host changed the face of modern discourse with his ability to break down the country’s salient liberal-conservative divide into the most puerile of terms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/is_limbaugh_finished_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/is_limbaugh_finished_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>56</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cumulus CEO on Limbaugh advertising fallout: &#8220;The facts are indisputable&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/cumulus_ceo_on_limbaugh_advertising_fallout_the_facts_are_indisputable/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/cumulus_ceo_on_limbaugh_advertising_fallout_the_facts_are_indisputable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cumulus media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13291897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cumulus CEO Lew Dickey stands by allegations that Limbaugh sank ad revenue for the network ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Asked to address speculation that Rush Limbaugh would be <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/rush_limbaugh_may_leave_radio_network_over_advertising_fallout/" target="_blank">leaving Cumulus Media</a> and that Limbaugh's comments about Sandra Fluke <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/rush_limbaugh_may_leave_radio_network_over_advertising_fallout/" target="_blank">lost the network millions</a> in ad revenue, CEO Lew Dickey commented: "We've had a tough go of it the last year. The facts are indisputable regarding the impact certain things have had on ad dollars."</p><p>Despite sources close to Limbaugh that accuse Dickey of scapegoating the radio host for a bad quarter, Limbaugh himself has addressed his advertiser woes in the past. But Limbaugh doesn't see his offensive bloviating as the problem driving mainstream advertisers away; instead, he <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&amp;v=_vciLI1qXCE" target="_blank">accuses</a> media buyers who are "young women fresh out of college" and "liberal feminists who hate conservatism" of "trying to harm" him.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/cumulus_ceo_on_limbaugh_advertising_fallout_the_facts_are_indisputable/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/cumulus_ceo_on_limbaugh_advertising_fallout_the_facts_are_indisputable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rush Limbaugh may leave radio network over advertising fallout</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/rush_limbaugh_may_leave_radio_network_over_advertising_fallout/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/rush_limbaugh_may_leave_radio_network_over_advertising_fallout/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 15:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Fluke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cumulus media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Criticism from Cumulus Media's CEO over Limbaugh's Sandra Fluke comments may drive him to jump ship, sources say]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh may not renew his contract with Cumulus Media in response to repeated criticism from the network's CEO over Limbaugh's offensive comments about <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sandra_fluke/" target="_blank">Sandra Fluke</a>, which allegedly lost the company millions of dollars in advertising revenue.</p><p>As <a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/media/2013/05/rush-limbaugh-may-leave-cumulus-163282.html" target="_blank">reported</a> by Politico:</p><blockquote><p>According to the source, <a href="http://www.politico.com/p/pages/rush-limbaugh" target="_blank">Limbaugh</a> is considering the move because Cumulus CEO Lew Dickey has blamed the company's advertising losses on Limbaugh's controversial remarks about <a href="http://www.politico.com/tag/sandra-fluke" target="_blank">Sandra Fluke</a>, the Georgetown law student. In Feb. 2012, Limbaugh referred to Fluke as "a slut" because she had called on congress to mandate insurance coverage of birth control. The subsequent controversy over those remarks resulted in a significant advertising boycott.</p> <p>The true extent of Limbaugh's effect on Cumulus's advertising revenue is not known. In an August 2012 earnings call, Dickey said Cumulus's top three stations had lost $5.5 million, in part because of the boycott. In a March 2013 earnings call, Dickey said the company's talk radio side had "been challenged... due to some of the issues that happened a year ago." Nevertheless, Limbaugh remains the most highly rated talk radio host in the country...</p> <p>The news of Limbaugh's possible departure comes one day ahead of Cumulus's Tuesday earnings call, at which Dickey Is once again likely to address the impact the Fluke controversy has had on advertising. The source close to the show described Dickey's remarks about advertising revenue as unjustified, and said such "criticism" of Limbaugh had resulted in the consideration to leave the company.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/rush_limbaugh_may_leave_radio_network_over_advertising_fallout/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/rush_limbaugh_may_leave_radio_network_over_advertising_fallout/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>52</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rush Limbaugh: Boston bombing suspects influenced by &#8220;liberal elite intellectual thought&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/rush_limbaugh_boston_bombing_suspects_influenced_by_liberal_elite_intellectual_thought/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/rush_limbaugh_boston_bombing_suspects_influenced_by_liberal_elite_intellectual_thought/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tamerlan Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dzokhar Tsarnaev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Marathon explosion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13280029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Limbaugh says the Tsarnaev brothers were hanging around the "wrong people" in Boston: Other Bostonians ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After <a href="http://mediamatters.org/video/2013/04/22/limbaugh-elite-education-in-america-radicalized/193718" target="_blank">arguing the same point</a> earlier that day, Rush Limbaugh once again accused American educational institutions and "liberal elite intellectual thought" of radicalizing young people in the United States -- including Boston bombing suspects Tamerlan and Dzokhar Tsarnaev.</p><p>In response to a caller who called Boston a "liberal hotbed" and suggested that the residents of Boston themselves were somehow to blame for the attack allegedly committed by the Tsarnaevs, Limbaugh <a href="http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=dittohead" target="_blank">ditto-headed</a> him:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/rush_limbaugh_boston_bombing_suspects_influenced_by_liberal_elite_intellectual_thought/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/23/rush_limbaugh_boston_bombing_suspects_influenced_by_liberal_elite_intellectual_thought/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh slams Sirota</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/limbaugh_slams_sirota/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/limbaugh_slams_sirota/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2013 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Sirota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Explosions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston Bombings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamophobia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13274089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush responded to Sirota's piece called “Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On his radio show Tuesday, Rush Limbaugh responded to David Sirota's Salon <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/16/lets_hope_the_boston_marathon_bomber_is_a_white_american/">piece</a>, called “Let’s hope the Boston Marathon bomber is a white American."</p><p>"In a nutshell, the author claims that if the bomber or bombers turn out to be anything but white Americans, it will set back the cause of liberalism," Limbaugh said. "That is, it will set back amnesty. It will set back gun control -- about which I should note there's a vote on the gun control bill at four o'clock this afternoon."</p><p>Limbaugh continued:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/limbaugh_slams_sirota/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/17/limbaugh_slams_sirota/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How baseball saved me from Rush Limbaugh</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/how_baseball_saved_me_from_rush_limbaugh/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/how_baseball_saved_me_from_rush_limbaugh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Driving Miss Sadie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nebraska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Giants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago Cubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baseball]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sadie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13269205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Iowa, a faraway Giants-Cubs radio broadcast rescued me from Limbaugh's toxic obsession with Michelle Obama]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it was another day of my cross-country car journey with my dog, Sadie, with stops to throw the ball. Before I explain how baseball saved me from Rush Limbaugh, first a Sadie update:  She misses Boulder, but found nature in this little patch of land behind La Quinta:</p><p><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/nature_sort_of_embed.jpg" alt="" title="nature_sort_of_embed" /></p><p>She thought this drainage ditch was another creek and made a run for it (I put her back on the leash):</p><p><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/drainage_ditch_embed.jpg" alt="" title="drainage_ditch_embed" /></p><p>One stop came in lovely Newton, Iowa, the childhood home of Charles Murray – I won’t hold that against Newton -- as well as Maytag headquarters. We had Sunset Park to ourselves in a cold rain:</p><p><img src="http://media.salon.com/2013/04/newton_iowa_sunset_park_embed.jpg" alt="" title="newton_iowa_sunset_park_embed" /></p><p>So, at one point I broke down and listened to Rush. You know, even the paranoid Sean Hannity sounds a little jauntier. Rush actually seems depressed. He was inveighing against Michelle Obama comparing herself to Hadiya Pendleton, the 15-year-old Chicago girl killed in gang violence in January. Obama’s speech was incredibly moving; NPR played long clips of it and she sounded as though she was fighting tears; listening to her, so was I.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/how_baseball_saved_me_from_rush_limbaugh/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/12/how_baseball_saved_me_from_rush_limbaugh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Melissa Harris-Perry doesn&#8217;t want to steal your children</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Melissa Harris-Perry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Caller]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Childhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Motherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Faludi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New Yorker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13266811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The MSNBC host stirred up a tempest -- but she was right]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melissa Harris-Perry thought it was, in her words, <a href="http://tv.msnbc.com/2013/04/09/why-caring-for-children-is-not-just-a-parents-job/">"an uncontroversial comment."</a> But when the MSNBC host and political commenter made a "Lean forward" spot for the network in which she made the bold wish "for Americans to see children as everyone’s responsibility," the conservative spin machine went into extra-frothy mode.</p><p>"We have never invested as much in public education as we should have," she says in the spot. "We haven't had a very collective notion of, these are our children. We have to break through our private idea that kids belong to their parents, or kids belong to their families, and recognize that kids belong to whole communities. Once it's everybody's responsibility and not just the household's, we start making better investments."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/10/melissa_harris_perry_doesnt_want_to_steal_your_children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>175</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh rewards child climate skeptic with an iPad</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/limbaugh_rewards_child_climate_skeptic_with_an_ipad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/limbaugh_rewards_child_climate_skeptic_with_an_ipad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Climate Change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate skeptics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13262821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The radio host explains that science has become a "branch of the Democrat Party"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On his show Thursday, Rush Limbaugh hosted a climate expert to explain how global warming is "a hoax." Sorry, did we say climate expert? We meant 13-year-old kid from Indiana. The young man called into Limbaugh's show and said he had done his own research at the local library for a school project and concluded that it was obvious that man-made climate change is bogus.</p><p>“It was really easy for me to find this evidence, really easy,” said young Alex. “I believe the reason that the liberals do not have the evidence [that it's a hoax] is because they do not want the evidence. They don't want to hear that it's wrong.”</p><p>Alex said he found all the information at the library, because he didn't have a computer. Limbaugh was so impressed that he told Alex he wanted to send him an iPad, assuming his parents were OK with it, in order to help him with future research.</p><p><a href="http://dailyrushbo.com/rush-the-hill-attacks-13-year-old-rush-caller-who-schooled-libs-on-global-warming-hoax/">Circling back today</a>, Limbaugh explained that "exactly as the news media is a branch of the Democrat Party, so too is much of science today." "The global warming scientists are just Democrats, folks. They're all part of an agenda," he continued, "The Democrats have literally politicized everything they can use to expand government, which is their primary objective."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/limbaugh_rewards_child_climate_skeptic_with_an_ipad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/05/limbaugh_rewards_child_climate_skeptic_with_an_ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limbaugh: There will be gay marriage &#8220;nationwide&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/limbaugh_there_will_be_gay_marriage_nationwide/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/limbaugh_there_will_be_gay_marriage_nationwide/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DoMA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13254469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The genie is not getting put back in the bottle," Rush said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh allowed on his radio show Wednesday that gay marriage "nationwide" is inevitable, regardless of how the Supreme Court rules on Proposition 8 and DOMA. Opponents of gay marriage, he said, are being told that "the country is changing and you better get with it and understand it. The genie is not getting put back in the bottle."</p><p>"And I think that's right," he added. "I don't care what this court does with this particular ruling, Proposition 8. I think the inertia is clearly moving in the direction that there is going to be gay marriage at some point nationwide."</p><p>Here's the audio, via <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/27/rush-limbaugh-gay-marriage_n_2965936.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003">Huffington Post</a>:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/42gwMb5LpuQ" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/limbaugh_there_will_be_gay_marriage_nationwide/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/28/limbaugh_there_will_be_gay_marriage_nationwide/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPAC: 3 things to watch for</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/the_3_things_to_look_for_at_cpac/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/the_3_things_to_look_for_at_cpac/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bob McDonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13228423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The event, which starts today, has never seemed like more of a caricature of itself. But we can still learn from it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Take a look at the speakers roster for the Conservative Political Action Conference, which kicks off in Washington today, and it’s easy to conclude that the annual gathering of conservative activists has devolved into a circus show. Not only are Chris Christie and Bob McDonnell, two of the most popular Republican governors in the country, not invited, but Donald Trump and Sarah Palin are being given two of the longest blocs of time at the podium. It’s almost enough to make it feel like CPAC ’13 was planned by some mischievous Democrat.</p><p>The event, as it always does, will attract thousands of conservative activists, opinion-shapers and politicians and will receive substantial media coverage. It’s hard to say exactly how well the conference, which serves as an umbrella for a funky area of right-leaning groups and causes, reflects the conservative movement, but the events of the next few days could provide some useful clues about where conservatism is heading in Barack Obama’s second term and the role that some prominent and ambitious Republicans will play in it.</p><p>To that end, here are three things to be watching for at CPAC:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/the_3_things_to_look_for_at_cpac/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/14/the_3_things_to_look_for_at_cpac/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seth MacFarlane to Rush Limbaugh: Now I understand why conservatives hate the media</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_to_rush_limbaugh_now_i_understand_why_conservatives_hate_the_media/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_to_rush_limbaugh_now_i_understand_why_conservatives_hate_the_media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth MacFarlane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2013 Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michelle Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Argo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvey Weinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Spielberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rush says he sent MacFarlane a mash note, and compares Michelle Obama's Oscar appearance to something out of Orwell]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seth MacFarlane has another admirer: Rush Limbaugh.</p><p>On Monday's radio broadcast, Limbaugh <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/02/25/the_one_of_a_kind_limbaugh_take_on_the_academy_awards">said</a> he sent the widely derided Oscars host an "attaboy note." MacFarlane's response, according to Rush? "You know what? I kind of understand how you conservatives feel about the media now."</p><p>Limbaugh was fired up about the Oscars, and saw evidence of a liberal conspiracy to create a totalitarian world, and also a political tug-of-war between Steven Spielberg and Harvey Weinstein.</p><p><a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/02/25/the_one_of_a_kind_limbaugh_take_on_the_academy_awards">Speaking</a> of Michelle Obama's appearance via video link to hand out the best picture Oscar with Jack Nicholson, Limbaugh said:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_to_rush_limbaugh_now_i_understand_why_conservatives_hate_the_media/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/seth_macfarlane_to_rush_limbaugh_now_i_understand_why_conservatives_hate_the_media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-wing media fails again!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/right_wing_media_fails_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/right_wing_media_fails_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Hagel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Kristol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13188915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The conservative echo machine wants to compare Chuck Hagel to a failed Bush nominee, no matter the reality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s sometimes easy to forget just how different the world of the conservative closed information loop is from, well, reality.</p><p>So it’s always worthwhile to point out examples of it, and this week supplied a doozy: the idea that Chuck Hagel is, as Bill Kristol put it, “<a href="http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/any-profiles-courage_699164.html">Obama’s Harriet Miers</a>.”</p><p>I’m not sure where the first instance of it appeared, but the Washington Post’s Jennifer Rubin used it in a <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-turn/wp/2013/01/07/topsy-turvy-hagel-politics/">Jan. 7 post</a>. To her credit, I suppose, Rubin’s use of the Miers analogy at least fit the situation she described. The problem, unfortunately, is that what she described was completely removed from reality – a nomination so anathema to mainstream Democrats that Hagel might be forced to withdraw before a confirmation hearing. Of course, in actuality, every Democrat who took a position before Hagel’s hearing supported his nomination. Oops!</p><p>But that hasn’t killed off the increasingly wrongheaded Miers analogy. Not at all. It showed up after Hagel’s hearing from Kristol and from National Review’s Dan Foster, who called him “<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/339467/harriet-hagel-daniel-foster">Harriet Hagel</a>.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/right_wing_media_fails_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/02/right_wing_media_fails_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP prepares to blame Obama for immigration deal collapse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/gop_prepares_to_blame_obama_for_immigration_deal_collapse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/gop_prepares_to_blame_obama_for_immigration_deal_collapse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lindsey Graham]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13185476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans position themselves to walk away from immigration reform -- trying to score points along the way]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While much of Washington seems very confident that a major immigration reform bill will pass this year, <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/28/three_reasons_to_be_skeptical_that_immigration_reform_will_pass/">I remain skeptical.</a> As I wrote yesterday, there are still some major obstacles, like "the Republican Party" and "the conservative movement." But Rush Limbaugh, no friend to the undocumented, <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/29/marco-rubio-rush-limbaugh_n_2575469.html?1359490382">recently gave reform supporter Marco Rubio a very generous and non-confrontational interview.</a></p><p>This is a big deal, because Limbaugh is going to either give Republican lawmakers cover to support reform without incurring the wrath of their constituents, or he is going to kill the entire thing. The fact that Limbaugh went out of his way to be respectful to Rubio is a sign that Rubio's got breathing room to actually push for real reform.</p><p>But Rubio <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/01/rubio-to-rush-i-have-an-escape-hatch-on-immigration.php">also repeatedly made it plain that he is leaving himself the option of walking away from the whole thing and blaming Obama.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/gop_prepares_to_blame_obama_for_immigration_deal_collapse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/30/gop_prepares_to_blame_obama_for_immigration_deal_collapse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>72</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rush&#8217;s latest abortion idiocy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/rushs_latest_abortion_idiocy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/rushs_latest_abortion_idiocy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2013 20:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13174416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The shock jock offers a new plan to stop abortion -- and takes conservative trolling to previously unknown heights]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There really isn't much to say about Rush Limbaugh anymore. Barely a day passes without hearing about some new, horrible thing he said.</p><p>And obviously, since you're reading this, today is no different.</p><p>After a rousing bit of back and forth with a caller on gun control ("<em>If you have gun control laws, the law-abiding will be the only people that don't have guns!</em>"), Limbaugh launched into a new theory about how to ban abortion in the United States.</p><p>By suggesting doctors perform them with <em>guns</em>.</p><p>Partial <a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2013/01/16/revenge_on_the_bitter_clingers" target="_blank">transcript</a> below (bold text mine):</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/rushs_latest_abortion_idiocy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/17/rushs_latest_abortion_idiocy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>112</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rush Limbaugh: Left will &#8220;normalize pedophilia&#8221; like it did gay marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/rush_limbaugh_left_will_normalize_pedophilia_like_it_did_gay_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/rush_limbaugh_left_will_normalize_pedophilia_like_it_did_gay_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2013 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Same-sex marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedophilia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13165092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["There’s a movement to normalize pedophilia," Limbaugh said. "Don’t pooh-pooh it"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rush Limbaugh tied the push to legalize same-sex marriages to a "movement to normalize pedophilia," arguing: "What has happened to gay marriage? It’s become normal."</p><p>“There is a movement on to normalize pedophilia, and I guarantee you your reaction to that is probably much the same as your reaction when you first heard about gay marriage,” Limbaugh said on his show on Monday. “What has happened to gay marriage? It’s become normal — and in fact, with certain people in certain demographics it’s the most important issue in terms of who they vote for.”</p><p>He added: “So don’t pooh-pooh. There’s a movement to normalize pedophilia. Don’t pooh-pooh it. The people behind it are serious, and you know the left as well as I do. They glom onto something and they don’t let go.”</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/rush-likens-pedophilia-normalization-to-gay-marriage-85862.html">Politico</a> reports that Limbaugh was responding to an article in the Guardian:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/rush_limbaugh_left_will_normalize_pedophilia_like_it_did_gay_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/08/rush_limbaugh_left_will_normalize_pedophilia_like_it_did_gay_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>76</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Resolved: In 2013, I&#8217;ll stop paying attention to Rush</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/resolved_in_2013_ill_stop_paying_attention_to_rush/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/resolved_in_2013_ill_stop_paying_attention_to_rush/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Beck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[django unchained]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Culture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, I'll exercise more, stop using emoticons and cancel cable. Well, we'll see about those...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've never been one for New Years resolutions, but, then, I've never been a father before, either. That means up until now, the symptoms of my early onset Old Jewish Man Syndrome -- anxiety, neurosis, self-hate and attendant gastrointestinal distress -- mostly affected just me, and not a small child. So I figure if there's a first time for everything, then 2013 is as good a year as any to come up with 10 resolutions that, if fulfilled, hold out the hope of making me a better and healthier dad, husband, writer and overall person.</p><p>Some of these will seem trivial, and others will seem more serious. My guess is that at least a few will ring true for you - and if they don't, well, at least you can have a good laugh at my expense. Here they are in no specific order:</p><p><strong>1. I will stop lying to my exercise machine:</strong> When it comes to my relationship with workout machines, I am nothing short of a pathological liar. Whether at home or on vacation, I tell the machines I meet that I weigh 173 pounds when I really weigh about 10 pounds more than that. In other words, when I program my workout, I tell the machine I'm the weight I want to be, but not the weight I actually am. Why do I do this and what the hell do I really think I'm getting away with?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/resolved_in_2013_ill_stop_paying_attention_to_rush/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/01/resolved_in_2013_ill_stop_paying_attention_to_rush/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Even more Limbaugh madness</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/even_more_limbaugh_madness/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/even_more_limbaugh_madness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 20:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rush Limbaugh]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: The NRA is classy! Liberal culture is to blame for Newtown! Even more from Rush's radio broadcast today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, Rush Limbuagh <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/limbaugh_nras_lapierre_the_adult_in_gun_control_debate/">praised</a> the NRA's Wayne LaPierre as the "adult" in the gun control debate today, after his surreal press conference which called for armed guards in every school in the country.</p><p>But he didn't stop there.</p><p>We<a href="http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/12/21/wayne_lapierre_calls_out_the_media"> tracked down</a> Rush's most inflammatory statements so you don't have to listen:</p><p>* "The NRA was very classy and laid back for a week. They didn't say anything, didn't get involved, didn't attempt to exploit it one way or another. They are the greatest, the largest gun safety organization in the country."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/even_more_limbaugh_madness/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/even_more_limbaugh_madness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
