<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/russell_d_feingold_d_wis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Can you say &#8220;Governor Russ Feingold&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/russ_feingold_governor_recall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/russ_feingold_governor_recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 16:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/10/russ_feingold_governor_recall</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former senator could make a comeback if Wisconsin's governor is forced into a recall election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question isn't really if Scott Walker and his fellow Wisconsin Republicans will suffer fallout from their surprise maneuver Wednesday night. It's how severe the fallout will be.</p><p>Walker and the state's Republican senators, as <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/wisconsin/index.html?story=/tech/htww/2011/03/09/wisconsin_goes_nuclear">you've surely heard by now</a>, decoupled their proposal to strip public workers of their collective bargaining rights from a budget bill, allowing them to push it through the upper chamber with the entire Democratic caucus still holed up across state lines in Illinois. The GOP-controlled Assembly will presumably pass the bill today and Walker will then sign it.</p><p>Politically, this represents a wholly reckless move. Wisconsin's state government has been paralyzed for weeks because of the collective bargaining impasse, and in that time public opinion <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/03/ramussen-poll-majority-of-wisconsinites-side-with-unions-on-collective-bargaining.php">swung sharply against</a> Walker and his plan. All of the noise generated by the Democrats' resistance seemed to have convinced a majority that Walker's plan is out of the mainstream. That these same voters will now hear that Walker and the GOP&#160;resorted to an extraordinary measure to jam it through will only harden this assessment -- and, potentially, make GOP&#160;legislators and the governor himself vulnerable to recall efforts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/russ_feingold_governor_recall/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/10/russ_feingold_governor_recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>129</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Russ Feingold&#8217;s demise shouldn&#8217;t be a surprise</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/01/russ_feingold_curtains/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/01/russ_feingold_curtains/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 20:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/01/russ_feingold_curtains</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[18 years after notching an inspiring upset victory, the progressive icon seems headed for defeat]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two misconceptions probably explain why so many observers are surprised that Russ Feingold <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/wi/wisconsin_senate_feingold_vs_johnson-1577.html">has fallen nearly 10 points behind</a> Republican Ron Johnson in his bid for a fourth term in the U.S. Senate. The first is that Wisconsin is an unflinching progressive bastion; the other is that Feingold has been an unusually popular politician in his home state. It's understandable how both of these views took hold.</p><p>Take Wisconsin's ideological reputation. The Badger State is home to Madison, the Upper Midwest's answer to Berkeley and Cambridge, and it's produced several progressive icons, like "Fighting Bob" La Folette, who won nearly 20 percent of the popular vote on the Progressive ticket in the 1924 presidential election, and Gaylord Nelson, the father of Earth&#160;Day. Plus, it was one of the very few states to side with Michael Dukakis in the 1988 presidential race, when the Duke was swamped in a 40-state landslide -- and one of only five to vote Democratic in each of the last six White House campaigns. Viewed against this backdrop, it's inconceivable that Wisconsin would turn its back on&#160;Feingold.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/01/russ_feingold_curtains/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/01/russ_feingold_curtains/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feingold opponent testified against anti-child abuse law</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/ron_johnson_child_victims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/ron_johnson_child_victims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/29/ron_johnson_child_victims</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron Johnson doesn't want victims of molestation to go around suing the people who enabled it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scandal! Did Russ Feingold film his recent TV ad -- in which he claims that he lives in the same house he used to live in -- in front of a <em>green screen?</em> A Wisconsin talk radio host (<a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/247402/feingold-back-day-daniel-foster">and Daniel Foster of the National Review!</a>) say he did. Because the ad looks funny. But "facts" -- specifically, multiple eye-witnesses -- <a href="http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin/statements/2010/sep/29/mark-belling/mark-belling-says-sen-russ-feingold-faked-his-tv-a/">say Feingold actually filmed the ad in front of his real-life house.</a> <object height="390" width="640"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/rU43UkT7ZbU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/rU43UkT7ZbU&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/ron_johnson_child_victims/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/29/ron_johnson_child_victims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday link dump: Not great men</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/21/tuesday_link_dump_18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/21/tuesday_link_dump_18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 22:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/21/tuesday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How to raise money from Harvard alums, why obstructionism works, and Russ Feingold's opponent]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>After everyone who didn't know already learned that Marty Peretz is a raging anti-Muslim bigot, donations to his undergraduate research endowment fund at Harvard <a href="http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2010/9/21/studies-social-peretz-committee/">"increased from $500,000 to $650,000."</a></li>
<li>Joe Lieberman is starting a "gang" to <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/09/lieberman-starting-a-bipartisan-high-income-tax-cuts-gang.php">fight for rich people tax cuts.</a> Because he really hates liberals.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.theawl.com/2010/09/dystopian-wisconsin-who-is-ron-johnson">Meet Ron Johnson</a>, the guy who'll probably beat Russ Feingold this November.</li>
<li>Ben Dimiero calls Jim "Gateway Pundit" Hoft <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201009210034">the "dumbest man on the Internet."</a></li>
<li><a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/09/gop_obstructionism_works_part.html?wprss=plum-line">The GOP proves that obstructionism works</a>. They kill "don't ask, don't tell" repeal, aren't punished for it by anyone, liberal base gets even more despondent.</li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/21/tuesday_link_dump_18/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/21/tuesday_link_dump_18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Russ Feingold should really be worried</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/01/russ_feingold_worry/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/01/russ_feingold_worry/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 17:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/01/russ_feingold_worry</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He's survived close calls before, but this year is starting to look different]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The New York Times has <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/01/us/politics/01wisconsin.html?_r=1&amp;hp">a lengthy story</a> today about Russ Feingold's unexpected reelection struggle in Wisconsin, but it's not exactly news. Polls have shown the three-term senator under 50 percent and in a dogfight with his likely GOP&#160;foe, businessman Ron Johnson, <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2010/senate/wi/wisconsin_senate_feingold_vs_johnson-1577.html">for a while</a> now.</p><p>Nor is it the first time Feingold has faced a difficult fall race. In his three successful Senate campaigns, his winning margins have been seven, two and 12 points and he's never secured more than 56 percent of the vote. It's tempting to think that this battle-tested past will help Feingold survive this year, but there's a big -- and potentially decisive -- difference between his previous campaigns and this year's: the national climate. Never before has he run with swing voters so predisposed to vote against the Democratic Party, and with such an apparent enthusiasm gap between the two parties' bases.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/01/russ_feingold_worry/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/01/russ_feingold_worry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>65</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Heroes, villains and cowards of the so-called &#8220;ground zero mosque&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/heroes_villains_ground_zero_mosque/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/heroes_villains_ground_zero_mosque/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken, D-Minn.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Howard Dean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York City]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newt Gingrich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Park51]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/08/19/heroes_villains_ground_zero_mosque</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Who's defended religious liberty, who's been too scared to, and who truly hates our founding principles?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bizarre, ginned-up controversy surrounding the Park51 project -- a proposed Islamic community center, like the 92nd Street Y, including a space for worship, to be built at the site of an old Burlington Coat Factory (<a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/08/when_is_a_coat_factory_not_a_coat_factory.php">which is a store, not a factory</a>) on Park Place in lower Manhattan, near, but not in sight of, the site of the World Trade Center -- has exposed not just the blatant Islamophobia (and cheerful willingness to exploit bigotry) of many luminaries of the right, but also the cowardice of many supposed liberals. Just so we know where we stand, and using, as criteria for placement, my own inexact impressions of their public statements, I present the official War Room lists of "ground zero mosque" heroes, villains and cowards.</p><p>
    <strong>Heroes</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/heroes_villains_ground_zero_mosque/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/19/heroes_villains_ground_zero_mosque/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tuesday link dump: Let&#8217;s get South Carolina back to work!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/tuesday_link_dump_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/tuesday_link_dump_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACLU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/29/tuesday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alvin Greene's new campaign site, Tom Coburn does something terrible, and updates on the Kos poll scandal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li>With a new report on political surveillance and harassment, <a href="http://www.aclu.org/spyfiles">the ACLU relaunches SpyFiles.</a> Here's <a href="http://www.aclu.org/spy-files/spying-first-amendment-activity-state-state#map">a helpful state-by-state map</a> of law enforcement agencies spying on citizens and obstructing legal political speech.&#160;Fun!</li>
<li>Depressing but utterly unsurprising headline of the day: <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/90457/tom-coburn-objects-to-bill-to-provide-benefits-to-homeless">"Tom Coburn Objects to Bill to Provide Benefits to Homeless."</a></li>
<li>More on the Kos/Research 2000 polling fraud fracas from <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/06/lawyer_for_dailykos_details_la.html?wprss=plum-line">The Plum Line</a>, <a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/kos_lawyer_he_handed_dailykos_fiction_and_claimed.php">Justin Elliott</a>, and <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/06/research-2000-issues-cease-desist.html">FiveThirtyEight</a>, who received a ridiculous cease &amp; desist.</li>
<li>Let's all <a href="http://wonkette.com/416346/supreme-court-sure-go-ahead-and-sue-the-pope">sue the Pope!</a></li>
<li>Anti-mosque opposition in New York <a href="http://www.observer.com/2010/politics/sheepshead-bay-residents-protest-mosque-employ-virulently-racist-rhetoric?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter&amp;utm_campaign=DT">still racially-motivated.</a></li>
<li>Austerity measures <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/29/business/global/29austerity.html">didn't really help Ireland that much.</a></li>
<li>Russ Feingold <a href="http://publicpolicypolling.blogspot.com/2010/06/feingold-leads-by-2.html">is looking weak in Wisconsin.</a></li>
<li>Dan Kois <a href="http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2010/06/joe_biden_called_my_old_boss_a.html">on his mean old boss getting told off by the vice president.</a></li>
<li>One of those Russian spies <a href="http://lbo-news.com/2010/06/29/misquoted-by-a-spy/">was also a shoddy reporter.</a></li>
<li>Alvin Greene <a href="http://www.alvingreeneforussenator.com/">has a wonderful new website.</a></li>
<li>The 2012 GOP nominating process <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/06/new-calendar-rules-could-create-chaos-for-gop-in-2012/58820/">could get kinda crazy.</a></li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/tuesday_link_dump_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/29/tuesday_link_dump_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP runs out of options for taking back the Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/15/senate_races_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/15/senate_races_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charlie Crist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Senate Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Bunning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/04/15/senate_races</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republicans simply don't have enough seats that they could possibly win to get to 51]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's no denying that the GOP is looking good going into the midterms this November. But we don't know exactly yet how good -- it'll depend a lot on the state of the economy over the coming months. And the fact is that, after two catastrophic elections, Republicans have a lot of ground to make up.</p><p>If conditions stay extremely favorable to the GOP, then it's very possible that control of the House of Representatives could flip. The universe of House seats that could be in serious play is larger than the margin between the two parties. On the other hand, the economy could start sinking again and it still probably wouldn't change control of the Senate. No matter how bad a year is ahead for Democrats, the structural constraints of senatorial elections make it virtually impossible for a change in party control -- especially given some recent developments.</p><p>Republicans need to pick up 10 seats in the Senate to install Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., as the majority leader. Even with the assumption that they knock off every possible target, and hold all of their vulnerable seats, it still looks like they'll need a wild card or two. And those seem to be slipping away.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/15/senate_races_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/15/senate_races_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another day, another vulnerable Dem Senate seat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/28/wisconsin_poll/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/28/wisconsin_poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wisconsin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/01/28/wisconsin_poll</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Poll shows a potential Republican challenger beating Wisconsin Sen. Russ Feingold]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bad election news for the Democrats keeps pouring in. Just ten days after the liberal bastion of Massachusetts elected a Republican to fill Sen. Ted Kennedy's seat, a new survey suggests that Wisconsin voters could be persuaded to abandon another liberal stalwart.</p><p>A Rasmussen <a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/wisconsin/election_2010_wisconsin_senate">poll</a> published on Thursday has progressive favorite Sen. Russ Feingold trailing potential Republican challenger Tommy Thompson 47 percent to 43 percent.</p><p>(Yes, it&#8217;s Rasmussen, and yes, because they use a likely voter model, their <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/is-rasmussen-reports-biased.html">surveys</a> tend to spot Republicans a couple points &#8211; but they were also <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/08/us/politics/08massachusetts.html">the first pollster</a> to show that Scott Brown had a real chance in Massachusetts, so at this point it seems like a bad idea for Democrats to dismiss their doomsday predictions out-of-hand.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/01/28/wisconsin_poll/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/01/28/wisconsin_poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Liberals will live without the public option</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/09/healthcare_liberals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/09/healthcare_liberals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 17:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2009/12/09/healthcare_liberals</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate compromise offers enough to make progressives forget about what had been a dealbreaker]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has managed to produce a renegotiated healthcare deal, everyone has to figure out what to think about it. While Sen. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., is <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2009/12/09/lieberman_statement/index.html">hedging</a>, liberals across the country are probably e-mailing each other right now, asking, &#8220;Where should we be on this?&#8221;</p><p>It&#8217;s early yet, but it&#8217;s looking like major progressive figures are feeling cautiously optimistic about the compromise Reid has crafted. Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., has been a major public option advocate all along. Of the new proposal, he <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/08/senate-sinks-abortion-ame_n_384846.html">says</a>, &#8220;I&#8217;ve got a smile on my face. I don't smile naturally.&#8221; However, Rockefeller&#8217;s Senate colleague Russ Feingold, D-Wis., isn&#8217;t quite as happy a camper. In a comment given to the New York Times, Feingold <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/09/us/09health.html?_r=2&amp;hp">expressed</a>&#160;some disapproval -- though he didn't actually promise to vote against a bill. &#8220;I do not support proposals that would replace the public option in the bill with a purely private approach,&#8221; Feingold said.&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/12/09/healthcare_liberals/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/12/09/healthcare_liberals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>59</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why the U.S. must leave Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/10/10/feingold_11/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/10/10/feingold_11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/10/10/feingold</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Russ Feingold says it's time to admit the war was a disaster -- and accuses his fellow Democrats of going along with Bush out of fear.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Wisconsin Sen. Russ Feingold has latched his political future to the third rail of American foreign policy. This summer, he proposed a date for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq: Dec. 31, 2006. The date raises a specter that no one in Washington -- and especially no Democrat -- has been willing to broach: that the American people should begin to prepare for a political failure in Iraq, at least a failure by President Bush's standard of establishing, before the troops leave, a fully functional, democratic Iraqi state. </p><p> It is not the first time Feingold has gone out on a political limb. In September, he was the only Democratic senator with presidential ambitions to support John Roberts. He was the only senator to vote against the USA Patriot Act. Before that, he spent nearly a decade fighting the culture of political payola, a fight he won in 2002 with passage of the McCain-Feingold legislation. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/10/10/feingold_11/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/10/10/feingold_11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get his robes ready</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/23/roberts_28/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/23/roberts_28/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 22:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/09/23/roberts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Conservatives gloat, senators posture and NPR's Nina Totenberg lobbies to protect her vacation plans as John Roberts' nomination sails through.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The leading generals in the fight to defeat the Supreme Court confirmation of John G. Roberts Jr. could not even get a seat in the room. As the Judiciary Committee gathered Thursday to vote their approval of Roberts, Ralph Neas, the head of People for the American Way, and Nan Aron, the head of the Alliance for Justice, stood in the back corner, crushed together with journalists and spectators like cigarettes in a new pack. Just an arm's length away, Roberts' supporters, including Leonard Leo of the conservative Federalist Society, sat comfortably in reserved seats. </p><p>"Not good," said Aron, after the ranking Democrat on the committee, Patrick Leahy, announced his support of Roberts. "Ask the woman in black and white. She is doing a lot better." Aron nodded in the direction of Andrea Lafferty, the executive director of the Traditional Values Coalition, who has made a career fighting against the rights of homosexuals to marry. Lafferty, wearing a zebra-inspired blouse, did appear ebullient. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/09/23/roberts_28/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/09/23/roberts_28/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reform phonies?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/16/campaign_finance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/16/campaign_finance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 1999 13:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/10/16/campaign_finance</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are Democrats conspiring with Republicans to block McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did opponents of campaign finance reform get a helping hand in their efforts to derail the McCain-Feingold bill Friday? That's what some on Capitol Hill are suggesting, and if it's true, the help came from the unlikeliest of places: two liberal Democrats who claim to be longtime reform advocates.</p><p>Minority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., and Sen. Bob "The Torch" Torricelli, D-N.J., offered a stronger substitute amendment -- which would have replaced McCain-Feingold with the much more comprehensive House version of the bill, offered and passed in the House by Reps. Christopher Shays, R-Conn., and Marty Meehan, D-Mass. A similar bill failed to get 60 Senate votes in February 1998 and the new amendment, should it replace the bill from Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Russ Feingold, D-Wisc., will certainly fail again.</p><p>The surprising move had Capitol Hill scrambling for answers and the staffs of the four leading campaign finance reformers confused as to what, exactly, Daschle and Torricelli were doing, and what was motivating them to do it.</p><p>"We always knew they [the Democrats] were going to try something like this," McCain said in an interview Friday afternoon. "Everyone in Washington wants to keep the status quo."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/10/16/campaign_finance/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/10/16/campaign_finance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What did Democrats sacrifice to win gun control?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/04/juvenile/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/04/juvenile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patrick J. Leahy, D-Vt.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ted Kennedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/06/04/juvenile</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republicans got a Draconian juvenile justice bill liberals had been determined -- until last month -- to defeat.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>S</b>ince when do liberal Democrats support the death penalty? Since when does Massachusetts Sen. Ted Kennedy support mandatory minimum sentences for 14-year-old offenders? Since when does California Sen. Barbara Boxer turn a deaf ear to the disproportionate number of African-Americans in prison?</p><p>Since Thursday, May 20, 1999.</p><p>That's when the Violent and Repeat Juvenile Accountability and Rehabilitation Act passed the Senate, 73-25, with nearly unanimous Democratic support. And while debate over the gun-control provisions in the act, known as the juvenile justice bill, received much fanfare and media ballyhoo, what is less well-known are the conservative Republican measures that constitute the larger share of it.</p><p>These were provisions that Democrats in the Senate had adamantly opposed last year, creating an impasse on legislative action and sticking the bill in senatorial purgatory. Then known as S10, the bill was reported out of the Judiciary Committee but it never hit the Senate floor because so many Democrats found much of the bill irreparably odious.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/06/04/juvenile/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/06/04/juvenile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How tough is John McCain?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/14/mccain_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/14/mccain_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1999 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John McCain, R-Ariz.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russell D. Feingold, D-Wis.]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/05/14/mccain</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The GOP contender stands up to Milosevic, but will he defy the NRA?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, a confession: Sen. John McCain almost seduced me (professionally). I was <i>this</i>close to becoming one of those reporters who swoon whenever the Republican senator from Arizona flashes his winning smile and demonstrates his passion and boyish enthusiasm. Just another journalist  infatuated with the prisoner of war turned politician.</p><p>And then he showed me that he was a mere mortal.</p><p>In Tuesday, in response to a question about what he would do if he were president in the aftermath of the Columbine High School shootings, McCain told me, "It's obvious that at a gun show people should be subject to background checks. I don't get it why in stores you get a background check, but you go three blocks down, there's no background checks."</p><p>There's a loophole in the existing gun control laws, I noted, because the gun lobby argued successfully to exempt gun shows.</p><p>"Well, it should be closed," McCain responded.</p><p>But a day later, on Wednesday, McCain voted to kill an amendment from Sen. Frank Lautenberg that would have closed that very loophole. The largely party-line vote was 51-47. Six Republicans voted for the measure. McCain was not among them. This after reports that the four guns used in the Columbine killings had been purchased at gun shows. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., complained, "It's like the NRA lives in here."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/1999/05/14/mccain_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/1999/05/14/mccain_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

