Salon Hack List 2011

18. Jon Meacham

The pretentious historian may have failed spectacularly at Newsweek, but he still won't go away

  • more
    • All Share Services

18. Jon Meacham

Charles Pierce tackled Meacham earlier this month, asking if the failed Newsweek editor is “the most insufferable human in Washington.” I’d say he very well could be, except for when he’s in New York lunching at Michael’s with Roger Ailes.

Meacham, a famous public intellectual (with the six honorary degrees and the Pulitzer Prize-winning biography of Andrew Jackson that go along with that title), undertook a mission to save print journalism by redesigning Newsweek and telling everyone it was going to be more like The Economist, which meant “for smart people,” and after losing $500,000 a week for a few years while not attracting tens of thousands of new, smart readers, the Kaplan Washington Post Co. finally gave up on owning Newsweek altogether, leaving Meacham out of work, which does give him a lot more time to appear on “Morning Joe.”

So, journalism was not saved by regurgitations of the foreign policy conventional wisdom by Fareed Zakaria or “controversial” covers like “LINCOLN VS. DARWIN,” and Economist readers were perfectly happy with The Economist, thank you.

Meacham was called “bizarrely incurious about the world” by one former staffer, and he does seem to care only about politics and how current politicians are like or not like politicians of the past. There are few political analysis clichés less edifying or useful than the old “an historian on how this candidate is just like Lincoln/Jackson/Adams/Henry Clay” bit. But for a political aficionado, he’s remarkably dim on politics. This classic 2009 editor’s letter arguing that Dick Cheney not only should but probably will run for president in 2012 is either link-bait trolling (very possible!) or evidence that Meacham is simply dumb.

He was the sort of magazine editor who kills a tough, critical introduction to an interview with Joe Scarborough when an unnamed “member of Scarborough’s team” calls him to complain, and who was unwilling to take responsibility for a sexist cover package on Sarah Palin that annoyed even us Palin-hating leftists.

He is now a Time columnist, where he bangs out 400 words weekly on how Occupy Wall Street reminded us of something to do with William Jennings Bryan and “What Jane Austen Could Teach Washington.” All of this is in the “Time Ideas” section, natch.

HACKIEST 2011 MOMENT:
His stirring defense, on “Morning Joe,” of President George W. Bush against the entirely factually accurate charge that he lied in order to justify launching a war of choice in Iraq: “To say someone lied adds a corrosive element to the public dialogue that we just don’t need,” Meacham said. Oh, heaven forfend. However will the Republic survive people claiming a president lied? I mean, it’s entirely possible that Bush launched a preemptive war based on cooked intelligence merely because he was moron surrounded by craven ideologues, which would I guess count as honest intentions.
- – - – - – - – - -

(Read the introduction here. Read the 2010 Salon Hack 30 List here.)

Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

19. Ruth Marcus

The Washington Post columnist makes up for her bland liberalism with her unquestioning fealty to authority

  • more
    • All Share Services

19. Ruth Marcus

Longtime Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus is, like most longtime Washington Post columnists, an eminently predictable fount of polite elite Beltway-area opinion. She’s generally a good moderate liberal. She dreams of bipartisan compromises, and lavishes praise on politicians willing to reject party “orthodoxy” in order to come to very orthodox centrist positions. She cares very much about tackling our long-term federal debt. She thinks Republicans are too extreme. She liked Mitch Daniels, except for the antiabortion stuff. She agrees with Robert Gibbs that liberals are “deranged” to criticize Obama, who, after all, has done the best he can, a few wasted opportunities, betrayals and inexplicable tactical missteps aside.

I think a brief post like this one, in which Marcus says Congress should name Gabrielle Giffords the honorary chairwoman of the deficit reduction supercommittee, sums up her general uselessness. There’s that traditional craving for “bipartisan unity” that all hack centrist columnists share, treating “bipartisan unity” as a self-evidently good thing instead of a hazy myth of questionable democratic worth. There’s the idea that the supercommittee was actually a serious idea designed to address a major and immediate crisis, instead of a can-kicking waste of everyone’s time in the service of looking serious about one of the least pressing problems currently facing the nation. There’s the idea that a silly symbolic gesture would create agreement among two groups with diametrically opposed policy goals. There’s an invocation of “common sense,” which is always meaningless and usually used to stand in for ideas popular among elites but hated by actual voters.

If you want to know what the world’s most boring establishmentarian liberal thinks about the issues of the day, Ruth Marcus has you covered.

HACKIEST 2011 MOMENT:
When 18-year-old high school student Emma Sullivan tweeted that she thinks Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback “sucks,” Brownback’s staff ratted this student out to school authorities, leading her principal to demand that the student write a letter of apology to the governor for disliking him. That’s weird and gross, except to Ruth Marcus, who imagined herself Sullivan’s mother, and fantasized about forcing that young woman to learn proper deference to authority figures. “If you were my daughter, you’d be writing that letter apologizing to Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback for the smart­alecky, potty-mouthed tweet you wrote after meeting with him on a school field trip,” Marcus wrote. Marcus then asserted that teenagers have no constitutional right to be rude to politicians, which is an interesting interpretation of the language and purpose of the First Amendment, to say the least.

It should be noted, for the record, that Gov. Sam Brownback, an anti-gay fanatic who once did this, does in fact suck.
- – - – - – - – - -
(Read the introduction here. Read the 2010 Salon Hack 30 List here.)

Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

20. Brian Williams

The NBC anchor is an annoying throwback to the outdated newsreaders of yesteryear

  • more
    • All Share Services

20. Brian Williams (Credit: Wikipedia/David Shankbone)

I’m sorry, but I’m just sick of him. I’m sick of his much-remarked-upon sense of humor, notable only because a news anchor capable of verbal communication that doesn’t involve a teleprompter is treated like a dog who knows a particularly clever trick. I’m sick of his constant invocation of his blue-collar Jersey roots, I’m sick of his stories about listening to Springsteen with his old friends Lou the mechanic and Sal the bricklayer. I’m sick of his perfect imitation of the ridiculous old flat-accented voice-of-god news anchors.

NBC gave him a talk show with the deeply stupid name “Rock Center” (no one in the known history of New York has referred to Rockefeller Center as “Rock Center,” I’m sorry that “30 Rock” took the name you wanted but you have to come up with something different), where he is not quite as funny as a late night talk show host and not quite as newsy as a news show host. And, obviously, not as opinionated as a cable news show host, because as a network evening news anchor, Mr. Williams is not allowed to think for himself, or hold opinions on issues other than the annoyingness of those Brooklyn Hipsters.

But it’s the never-ending, nonstop, beat-you-over-the-head blue-collar Jersey Shore shtick that grates the most. It’s desperate and unconvincing, coming from a multimillionaire television personality. We get it! You used to be “authentically” American, according to some arbitrary signifiers! (And if you’re so damn proud, why did you lose your accent?)

HACKIEST 2011 MOMENT:
A January appearance on “The Late Show With David Letterman,” in which Letterman, who in recent years has often displayed an environmentalist streak, asked Williams if recent freak weather events could be traced to anthropogenic climate change. Williams, mugging but clearly uncomfortable, declined to even acknowledge the existence of climate change itself. He refused to “take sides,” and joked, “What have I done to deserve this?” A perfect encapsulation of the uselessness of the “objective” (and idiotic) network nightly news anchor, too cowardly or dumb to “take sides” on a “debate” between craven political actors and the nearly universal scientific consensus. (But why would we expect a regular guy’s guy from Jersey to understand all that complicated climate science? He’s too busy cruising the shore in his souped-up Bel Air Hardtop with Mary and Puerto Rican Johnny to examine the evidence!)

- – - – - – - – - -

(Read the introduction here. Read the 2010 Salon Hack 30 List here.)

Continue Reading Close
Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

Welcome to the 2011 Salon Hack List

It's time again to list the worst, most predictable and least interesting pundits in America

  • more
    • All Share Services

Welcome to the 2011 Salon Hack List

The Salon Hack List is a list of our least favorite political commentators, newspaper columnists, political news show hosts, and constant cable news presences, ranked roughly (but only roughly) in order of awfulness and then described rudely. Criteria for inclusion included being wrong about literally everything, shameless sycophancy, appearing on “Morning Joe” and being “Morning Joe.”

Last year, our countdown was based on each hack’s entire career. We’re still looking at their whole bodies of work, but we’re focusing on the hackiest thing each entrant did in this rapidly ending year.

The countdown begins right now, and concludes tomorrow afternoon. Enjoy!

Last year’s Hack Thirty is here.

Alex Pareene

Alex Pareene writes about politics for Salon and is the author of "The Rude Guide to Mitt." Email him at apareene@salon.com and follow him on Twitter @pareene

Page 4 of 4 in Salon Hack List 2011