<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Sandra Bullock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sandra_bullock/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Sandra Bullock withdraws from Gulf video</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/30/bullock_gulf_oil_spill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/30/bullock_gulf_oil_spill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/trending/2010/07/30/bullock_gulf_oil_spill</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Academy Award-winning actress shuns PSA after learning foundation's oil-company affiliations]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandra Bullock wants <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/07/29/bullock-disowns-bp/">out of a public service announcement</a> promoting restoration of the Gulf Coast. But before you start burning Bullock in effigy, know that the group that produced the campaign, Women of the Storm, is partnered with America's Wetland Foundation, which is financed by BP, Shell, ExxonMobil and other oil companies.</p><p>Upon the news, the publicist for Bullock, who has a home in New Orleans, released a statement:</p><blockquote>
<p>Ms. Bullock was originally contacted through her attorney to be a part of the PSA in order to promote awareness of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. At no time was she made aware that any organization, oil company or otherwise had influence over Women of the Storm or its message. We have immediately asked for her participation in the PSA be removed until the facts can be determined.</p>
</blockquote><p>Anne Milling, founder of Women of the Storm, <a href="http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/b192993_sandra_bullock_wants_be_erased_from.html">denies any funding from oil companies</a> and says she hopes Bullock will rejoin the video once "she listens to the facts and understands that Women of the Storm has had no connection or taken money from oil companies."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/30/bullock_gulf_oil_spill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/30/bullock_gulf_oil_spill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandra Bullock: The comeback kiss</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/07/sandra_bullock_mtv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/07/sandra_bullock_mtv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MTV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/06/07/sandra_bullock_mtv</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Post-scandal, cheaters go to sex rehab and wronged wives ... smooch Scarlett Johansson at the MTV Movie Awards]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Sunday, Sandra Bullock emerged from seclusion, and made her first live television appearance since splitting with her straying husband, to kiss Scarlett Johansson -- and to accept MTV's Generation Award. Just take a wild guess as to which of those accomplishments is making headlines today (hint: see above).&#160;</p><p>Like a good sport, Bullock showed up to last night's MTV Movie Awards wearing a back-revealing black sequined number and some serious platform heels (that some might liken to a type of shoe worn by another type of female performer). It was a costume of triumph, a "look at me now" getup. She looked gorgeous and graceful as Johansson and&#160;past costars&#160;Bradley Cooper and Betty White called her up on stage to accept the award for her&#160;"riveting and diverse contributions to the film industry." She was charming and funny when she told White: "I want your life. I'm serious, I want your life. I want <em>your</em>&#160;life." Although, per the usual, White stole the show by interrupting with a piece of advise:&#160;"Honey, don't ever wear that dress backward."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/07/sandra_bullock_mtv/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/07/sandra_bullock_mtv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jesse James: Self-hatred poster boy</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/jesse_james_self_hate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/jesse_james_self_hate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/05/25/jesse_james_self_hate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An ABC interview with Sandra Bullock's ex proves nobody wrecks our lives like we do]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When ABC correspondent Vicky Mabrey described him as the most hated man in America, <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/03/19/this_week_in_crazy_jesse_james">Jesse James</a> quickly corrected her. "I think the most hated man in the world now." And as the daredevil, motorcycle enthusiast, and soon to be ex-husband of Sandra Bullock said those words, there was a nervous smile on his face. An odd bit of pride, even. Nobody screws up our lives quite like we do.</p><p>James, whose seemingly picture-perfect marriage to America's sweetheart took an abrupt nosedive earlier this year with the revelations of his grandly ill-advised infidelities, is the subject of an entire edition of Tuesday's "Nightline" (apparently there's only so much of a public appetite for oil spills), a lengthy preview of which aired today on "Good Morning America." Speaking out directly for the first time since his marital combustion, James repeated a familiar list of platitudes from the Philanderer's Guide to Public Contrition, admitting, "I lied," and, "I deserve everything bad that's coming my way."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/jesse_james_self_hate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/25/jesse_james_self_hate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jesse James: I threw it all away</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/jesse_james_interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/jesse_james_interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 18:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/05/21/jesse_james_interview</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A promo of his interview with ABC's "Nightline" is packed with empty platitudes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Less than three months after word broke of his extramarital affairs, Jesse James is doing his public penance by submitting to a&#160;cross-examination on national television. Today, a <a href="http://www.people.com/people/package/article/0,,20364464_20387122,00.html">promo was released</a> of his sit-down with ABC's Vicki Mabrey, and it's just about what you would expect. He delivers teary-eyed platitudes like "I took a pretty amazing life and marriage and threw it away," and there are compelling exchanges like this one:&#160;</p><blockquote>
<p>Mabrey: "You cheated on your wife."</p>
<p>James: "Yup."</p>
</blockquote><p>Probing, illuminating! How will we survive until it airs Tuesday on "Nightline"?&#160;Presumably, there will be a little more emotional insight in the full interview, although his declaration that he's "the most hated man in the world" suggests a certain lack of perspective.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/jesse_james_interview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/jesse_james_interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandra Bullock&#8217;s triumphant new role: Single mom</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/sandra_bullock_divorce_and_baby/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/sandra_bullock_divorce_and_baby/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/04/28/sandra_bullock_divorce_and_baby</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The actress loses one man in her life -- but shows off the new one]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is how you do it, ladies. No apologizing for your own <a href="http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/04/25/getting-beyond-eliot-silda-spitzer-needs-a-date/">"failing,"</a> saying (as Silda Spitzer did recently), "The wife is supposed to take care of the sex."&#160; No stealthy, stand-by-your-man <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/02/19/tiger_woods_apology">wall of silence</a>.&#160;Just a few weeks after her personal life blew up with revelations her husband, <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/03/19/this_week_in_crazy_jesse_james/index.html">Jesse James, was stepping out</a> with a colorful array of tattoo models and exotic dancers, Sandra Bullock is on the cover of <a href="http://www.people.com/people/">Peopl</a>e, smiling, her ring finger blatantly unadorned, holding her brand-new adopted baby. So there.</p><p>In the story, Bullock confirms that she's filed for divorce from James and is the new mother of 3-and-a-half month-old Louis Bardo Bullock. She says she and James initiated the adoption process four years ago and brought the child, who was born in New Orleans, home together in January. Bullock is finalizing the adoption as a single parent.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/sandra_bullock_divorce_and_baby/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/sandra_bullock_divorce_and_baby/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullock is divorcing James, adopting baby</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/us_people_bullock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/us_people_bullock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adoption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/2010/04/28/us_people_bullock</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bullock says she's "sad and scared" over split, excited about her newborn son, Louis]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandra Bullock has filed for divorce from her husband, Jesse James, and is adopting a baby boy as a single parent, a story posted Wednesday on People magazine's website.</p><p>"Yes, I have filed for divorce," the 45-year-old Oscar-winning actress said in an interview with People. "I'm sad and I am scared."</p><p>Bullock and James, 41, began the adoption process four years ago, the report said, and brought 3 1/2-month-old Louis Bardo Bullock home in January but decided to keep the news to themselves until after the Academy Awards.</p><p>In the interview, Bullock said she is savoring her new maternal status.</p><p>"You wake up, you feed, you burp, you play, you do laundry," she said. "I'm still in that stage where I'm just amazed with him and at life."</p><p>"All I said when I met him was, 'Oh, there you are.' It was like he had always been a part of our lives."</p><p>The baby, called Louie, is named after jazz great Louis Armstrong, who had particularly touched her with his signature song, "What a Wonderful World," said Bullock. The child was born in New Orleans, a city where Bullock and James had both spent time after Katrina.</p><p>Bullock said she got the call that a baby might be available for adoption during what she described as "the media craziness of the awards season."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/us_people_bullock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/28/us_people_bullock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michelle &#8220;Bombshell&#8221; McGee: America&#8217;s Next Top Mistress</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/mistresses_celebrities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/mistresses_celebrities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tiger Woods]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/04/05/mistresses_celebrities</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jesse James' "other woman" joins a celebrity boxing match. Brace yourselves for her inevitable reality TV show]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm going to have to scrub myself with bleach after writing this sentence, but here I go:&#160;Michelle "Bombshell" McGee, Jesse James' alleged mistress, is <a href="http://www.usmagazine.com/celebritynews/news/michelle-mcgee-to-work-with-hailey-glassman-201044">set to referee a boxing match</a> between Jon Gosselin's ex-girlfriend, Hailey Glassman, and adult actress Gina Lynn, star of "Welcome To Boobstown." (Scrubbing commences.) It's quite the fight card: In one corner, we have a reality TV dad's "other woman" and, in the other, we have a porn star -- perhaps the most ubiquitous type of "other woman." Of course, the only reasonable judge for such a match would be the most talked about "other woman" of ... this week.</p><p>Speaking of, Radar reports that McGee returned to the stage at San Diego's Pure Platinum strip club Friday night. She worked the pole and performed lap dances for $100 a pop. One of Radar's intrepid video journalists procured some one-on-one time with the tabloid star and <a href="http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2010/04/exclusive-video-michelle-bombshell-returns-work-stripper">recorded the whole thing</a> in the style of P.O.V. porn. Now all you folks at home can pretend Sandra Bullock's husband's mistress is crawling on <em>your</em> lap and humping <em>your</em> knee.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/mistresses_celebrities/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/05/mistresses_celebrities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sandra Bullock should have stayed home?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/david_brooks_sandra_bullock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/david_brooks_sandra_bullock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/03/30/david_brooks_sandra_bullock</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Columnist David Brooks uses the actress to illustrate the danger of choosing a career over love. Gimme a break!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like David Brooks finally got wind of Sandra Bullock's marital mess. His <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/30/opinion/30brooks.html">column</a> today, headlined "The Sandra Bullock Trade," ingeniously uses her misfortune as a teachable moment: Don't choose a career over love, girls.</p><p>OK, so he doesn't go so far as to say that personal ambition is responsible for Sandra Bullock winning an&#160;Oscar and, you know, "losing" her husband. He doesn't frame it outright as a uniquely feminine compromise. He doesn't even touch on the absurd <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet/2010/03/19/best_actress_curse">"Oscar curse" buzz.</a> He instead poses some "philosophic" questions -- "Would you take that as a deal? Would you exchange a tremendous professional triumph for a severe personal blow?" -- and then scolds the "absolutely crazy" readers who answered in the affirmative. (Yet more proof of the masochism of people who read David Brooks.)&#160;But, let's be real, he's&#160;chosen to write about a piece of pop culture gossip that has largely been talked about in terms of a woman ultimately trading love for her career.&#160;And promulgating the work-home dilemma is Brooks' bread and butter: He <a href="http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2006/01/04/brooks_and_hekker/">believes that women are happier in the domestic sphere</a>. So,&#160;I can't help suspecting that there is a stay-at-home undercurrent in his argument.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/david_brooks_sandra_bullock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/30/david_brooks_sandra_bullock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>125</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This week in crazy: Jesse James</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/20/this_week_in_crazy_jesse_james/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/20/this_week_in_crazy_jesse_james/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jesse James]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[This Week in Crazy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2010/03/19/this_week_in_crazy_jesse_james</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock's hot-doggin' hubby went for one thrill too many -- and her name is Michelle "Bombshell" McGee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm not saying that if you cheat on America's sweetheart with a woman who named herself "Bombshell" it's&#160;<em>always</em> going to blow up in your face, but -- oh, wait, yes I am.</p><p>A week and change&#160;after Sandra Bullock won her&#160;<a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/stephanie_zacharek/2010/02/07/oscar_performances_bullock">Academy Award for best actress</a>, <a href="http://www.myspace.com/thesocalbombshell">Michelle McGee</a>&#160;--&#160;tattoo model, webcam girl and occasional <a href="http://photos.tmz.com/galleries/all_hail_jesse_james_alleged_mistress#tab=most_recent&amp;id=65649">fan of Gestapo garb</a>&#160;-- spilled to <a href="http://www.intouchweekly.com/2010/03/in_touch_exclusive_interviewsa.php">InTouch magazine</a>&#160;about her liaisons with Mr. Sandy B., Jesse James. The story was tawdry stuff: While Bullock was filming "The Blind Side," McGee claims she was getting it on for nearly a year with with the <a href="http://www.spike.com/show/30898">stunt-loving</a> <a href="http://westcoastchoppers.com/">motorcycle entrepreneur</a>, who turned out to be so impressively endowed she nicknamed him "The Vanilla Gorilla."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/20/this_week_in_crazy_jesse_james/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/20/this_week_in_crazy_jesse_james/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dispelling Sandra Bullock&#8217;s &#8220;Oscar curse&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/19/best_actress_curse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/19/best_actress_curse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadsheet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life/broadsheet//2010/03/19/best_actress_curse</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If there is a meaningful link between an acting Oscar and divorce, it's the men who should be worried]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Sandra Bullock and Kate Winslet. Just moments -- or in the latter case, a year -- after winning Best Actress Oscars, they've lost their marriages. Why, it's almost as though there's a <a href="http://www.oregonlive.com/movies/index.ssf/2010/03/has_the_best_actress_oscar_cur.html">curse</a> on the women who take home that statue! Or perhaps it's something a little more down-to-earth; Nicole LaPorte at <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-03-18/how-oscars-ruin-a-marriage/2/">The Daily Beast</a> wonders, "Is the ultimate honor for women in Hollywood the ultimate castration for men?"</p><p>Consider: In addition to Bullock and Winslet, Jane Wyman, Reese Witherspoon, Halle Berry, Hilary Swank and Helen Hunt all got divorced within a couple years of winning Academy Awards -- and Julia Roberts broke up with Benjamin Bratt not long after she did. (Also, although Sarah Jessica Parker and Matthew Broderick have been married for over a decade, and she's never been nominated for an Oscar, LaPorte would like you to know that Broderick was "glumly trailing his wife" on the red carpet this year, as she "was fawned over by the paparazzi and fashion police." Beverly Hills psychiatrist Carole Lieberman agrees that "He was looking miserable the whole time" and her success "may well doom that marriage." So there's that.) Since at least three of these break-ups famously involved the male partners cheating -- and we all know <em>that</em> never happens unless a guy is feeling threatened by a woman's success -- what more evidence do we need that the fundamental problem in each relationship was men suffering "the ultimate castration"? (Aside from, you know, actual castration, which I imagine would feel somewhat more definitive to the man experiencing it.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/19/best_actress_curse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/19/best_actress_curse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jesse James apologizes to Sandra Bullock, his kids</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/us_people_sandra_bullock_1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/us_people_sandra_bullock_1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/2010/03/18/us_people_sandra_bullock_1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amid Internet tabloid reports of an affair, the 40-year-old motorcycle builder says he's sorry]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesse James says he's sorry for the pain and embarrassment he's caused his wife Sandra Bullock and his three children from previous relationships.</p><p>James told People magazine in a statement Thursday that he exhibited "poor judgment" and "I deserve everything bad that is coming my way."</p><p>Internet tabloid reports surfaced Wednesday alleging that 40-year-old motorcycle builder had been unfaithful to Bullock, whom he married in 2005. Bullock subsequently canceled a planned appearance in London for the premiere of "The Blind Side," for which she won an Oscar, a Screen Actors Guild Award and a Golden Globe.</p><p>Representatives for James and Bullock did not respond to calls and e-mails seeking comment.</p><p>THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.</p><p>LOS ANGELES (AP) -- Sandra Bullock canceled her appearance at the London premiere of "The Blind Side" days after Internet reports alleged she was having trouble in her marriage and that she had left the couple's Southern California home.</p><p>Calls and e-mails to representatives for Bullock and her husband, celebrity motorcycle builder Jesse James, weren't immediately answered.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/us_people_sandra_bullock_1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/us_people_sandra_bullock_1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bullock cancels appearance after reports of split</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/us_people_sandra_bullock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/us_people_sandra_bullock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//2010/03/18/us_people_sandra_bullock</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stories claim husband, celebrity motorcycle builder Jesse James, was unfaithful]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sandra Bullock canceled her appearance at the London premiere of "The Blind Side" days after Internet reports alleged she was having trouble in her marriage and that she had left the couple's Southern California home.</p><p>Calls and e-mails to representatives for Bullock and her husband, celebrity motorcycle builder Jesse James, weren't immediately answered.</p><p>People.com said Bullock had left the couple's home just days before a report of infidelity by her husband surfaced.</p><p>The couple were last seen together publicly at the Oscars. While Bullock didn't specifically thank James in her acceptance speech for best actress, they walked hand-in-hand on the red carpet, and he attended numerous award shows with her leading up to the Oscars.</p><p>The 45-year-old actress said Wednesday in a statement by Warner Bros. UK that she cannot attend next Tuesday's premiere of "The Blind Side" for "unforeseen personal reasons." She canceled her appearance almost two weeks after winning the Oscar for her performance in the movie.</p><p>Bullock went on to apologize for canceling her commitment and to thank people for their support of the film, which has made nearly $253 million domestically.</p><p>She and James were married in July 2005.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/us_people_sandra_bullock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/18/us_people_sandra_bullock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscars: Hollywood&#8217;s war against itself (continued)</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/oscar_wrap_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/oscar_wrap_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[An Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crazy Heart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathryn Bigelow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hurt Locker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/andrew_ohehir/2010/03/08/oscar_wrap</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oscar voters picked the lowest-grossing winner in history -- artistic integrity or commercial suicide?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I'm grateful to have been thoroughly and completely wrong about the best-picture race -- as were a great many other supposedly knowledgeable stooges -- for a whole bunch of reasons. First and foremost, <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/2010/03/08/kathryn_bigelow_is_not_a_dude/">Kathryn Bigelow's</a> historic sweep was a genuinely moving and surprising capper to one of the most tedious Oscar broadcasts in recent memory. All that industry hand-wringing, a much-touted new production team, and what do we get? Interpretive dance numbers set to fragments of the nominated scores. Seriously? If they'd hired the Sparkle Motion dance team out of "Donnie Darko," it couldn't have been any lamer. (Actually, that would been a lot more fun to watch.)</p><p>Although I have mixed feelings about <a href="http://www.salon.com/ent/movies/review/2009/06/26/hurt_locker/">"The Hurt Locker"</a> itself, and about the cultural-psychological reasons for its ascendancy, Bigelow herself is a genuine and strange cinematic genius who has paid her dues several times over and richly deserves her moment of triumph. (Is "Hurt Locker" her best film? Probably not. Her second-best? Not even sure about that.) I wish producer-screenwriter Mark Boal hadn't complicated Bigelow's big moment on the stage of the Kodak Theatre by persistently tugging on her elbow, like a kid in a department store who needed to use the john. That was odd.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/oscar_wrap_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/oscar_wrap_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>List of winners at the 82nd annual Oscars</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/us_oscars_list/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/us_oscars_list/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 13:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Bridges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar 2010: The Performances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Hurt Locker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/oscars/2010/03/08/us_oscars_list</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The Hurt Locker," Jeff Bridges, Sandra Bullock and Kathryn Bigelow take  top Oscars]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>List of winners at the 82nd annual Academy Awards:</p><p>-- Motion Picture: "The Hurt Locker."</p><p>-- Actor: Jeff Bridges, "Crazy Heart."</p><p>-- Actress: Sandra Bullock, "The Blind Side."</p><p>-- Supporting Actor: Christoph Waltz, "Inglourious Basterds."</p><p>-- Supporting Actress: Mo'Nique, "Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire."</p><p>-- Director: Kathryn Bigelow, "The Hurt Locker."</p><p>-- Foreign Film: "El Secreto de Sus Ojos," Argentina.</p><p>-- Adapted Screenplay: Geoffrey Fletcher, "Precious: Based on the Novel 'Push' by Sapphire."</p><p>-- Original Screenplay: Mark Boal, "The Hurt Locker."</p><p>-- Animated Feature Film: "Up."</p><p>-- Art Direction: "Avatar."</p><p>-- Cinematography: "Avatar."</p><p>-- Sound Mixing: "The Hurt Locker."</p><p>-- Sound Editing: "The Hurt Locker."</p><p>-- Original Score: "Up," Michael Giacchino.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/us_oscars_list/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/08/us_oscars_list/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to fix the Oscar nominations</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/09/lipsky_oscars/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/09/lipsky_oscars/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 01:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Avatar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broken Embraces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Film Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movie Awards Season]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pedro Almodovar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/film_salon/2010/02/08/lipsky_oscars</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are too many Academy members -- and too few who actually watch movies. Plus: The foreign-film paradox]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, the underlying problem with the Oscars is that members vote only for the films and craftspeople whose work they've seen, not for the best films and craftspeople whose work qualify for the awards. That will never change, so the best will never (or seldom, or only inadvertently) emerge to win, or even be nominated. Membership in the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences numbers about 6,000. Perhaps the voting membership should be pared down, to 1,000 or fewer.</p><p>It only takes four hours per week for a voting AMPAS member (or anyone else) to watch 100 films a year. That should be the minimum requirement for voting. Impossible to prove or to monitor? So what. Maybe a few more members could at least be guilted into screening a few more of the hundreds of eligible films, in all categories. I truly believe most AMPAS members try to exercise their voting privilege earnestly, even when they're ill-informed of the options. (I honestly believe that 90 percent of all AMPAS acting branch members who voted for <a href="http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/stephanie_zacharek/2010/02/07/oscar_performances_bullock/index.html">Sandra Bullock</a> in "The Blind Side" would have voted first for Catalina Saavedra had they seen <a href="http://www.themaidmovie.com/">"The Maid."</a>)&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/09/lipsky_oscars/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/09/lipsky_oscars/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar 2010: In defense of Sandra Bullock</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/oscar_performances_bullock/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/oscar_performances_bullock/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscar 2010: The Performances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oscars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bullock]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/stephanie_zacharek/2010/02/07/oscar_performances_bullock</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Her critics sniff that she just plays herself, but the fierceness of her "Blind Side" performance can't be denied]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to thinking about what actors do and how they do it, my least favorite time of year is the four-week period between the Oscar nomination announcements and the actual awards ceremony. It's one thing to talk about the performances of the past year that delighted us, tickled us, intrigued us, distressed us or surprised us. But once those nominations have been slipped under our noses, pondering who might win the best-actor and best-actress awards practically invites snobbery. Part of the problem is right there in the second half of that too-often-used phrase "Oscar-worthy." "Worthiness" is one of those Puritan New England words that suggests a strict, immutable bond between hard work and concomitant rewards. There's only one best-actor and one best-actress Oscar per year. Therefore, the award should go to the performance that the greatest number of people can admit to admiring with the fewest equivocations or apologies. If a performer mastered a difficult accent, had a big, show-stopping monologue, or indulged in the kind of Shakespearean brooding that betrays a history of classical training, that increases his or her chances of being deemed -- by critics, by Oscar pundits, by the public -- as "deserving."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/oscar_performances_bullock/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/08/oscar_performances_bullock/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

