<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Saturday Night Live</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/saturday_night_live/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 15:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FreedomWorks debacle: Tea Party fractures laid bare</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/freedomworks_debacle_tea_party_fractures_laid_bare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/freedomworks_debacle_tea_party_fractures_laid_bare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BillMoyers.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedomworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Armey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mother Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Corn]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159559</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dick Armey's sudden -- and expensive -- departure from the nonprofit reveals a political movement on the brink]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As "Saturday Night Live’s" <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefon" target="_blank">Stefon</a> would say, this Washington tale has everything: accusations hurled and counter-hurled, handguns, multimillion-dollar payoffs — just what we needed to briefly distract us as the parties played chicken up on Capitol Hill’s fiscal cliff.</p><p>The story first came to public attention in early December, when David Corn and Andy Kroll at Mother Jones magazine <a href="http://ow.ly/grbRD" target="_blank">reported </a>that “former Rep. Dick Armey, the folksy conservative leader, has resigned as chairman of <a href="http://www.freedomworks.org/" target="_blank">FreedomWorks</a>, one of the main political outfits of the conservative movement and an instrumental force within the Tea Party.</p><p>“Armey, the former House majority leader who helped develop and promote the GOP’s Contract with America in the 1990s, tendered his resignation in a memo sent to Matt Kibbe, president and CEO of FreedomWorks, on Nov. 30. Mother Jones obtained the email on Monday, and Armey has confirmed he sent it. The tone of the memo suggests that this was not an amicable separation … Armey demanded that he be paid until his contract ended on Dec. 31; that FreedomWorks remove his name, image or signature ‘from all its letters, print media, postings, web sites, videos, testimonials, endorsements, fund raising materials, and social media, including but not limited to Facebook and Twitter’; and that FreedomWorks deliver the copy of his official congressional portrait to his home in Texas.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/freedomworks_debacle_tea_party_fractures_laid_bare/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/freedomworks_debacle_tea_party_fractures_laid_bare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to spot an &#8220;anarcho-capitalist&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/how_to_spot_an_anarcho_capitalist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/how_to_spot_an_anarcho_capitalist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern Poverty Law Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alex Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hugo Chavez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WorldNetDaily]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13126957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new breed of investment consultant mixes dubious financial advice with anti-government propaganda]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.splcenter.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/splc_180.jpeg" alt="The Southern Poverty Law Center" align="left" /></a> Back in 1978, when the world was young and “Saturday Night Live” was only in its third season, a young comedian named Steve Martin took to the stage and told his audience how to become millionaires and never pay taxes.</p><p>“First … get a million dollars,” he <a href="http://snltranscripts.jt.org/77/77imono.phtml">said</a>. “What do [you] say to the tax man when he comes to [your] door and says, ‘You have never paid taxes?’ Two simple words. Two simple words in the English language: ‘I forgot!’”</p><p>Porter Stansberry, an “investment advisor” with a knack for lining his own pockets, used a slightly different strategy in 2003. When the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) came to <em>his</em> door and accused him of making over a million dollars selling false “inside tips,” the self-aggrandizing financial guru claimed that it was his First Amendment right to tell his subscribers whatever he wanted — even if what he wanted to tell them was, <a href="http://www.sec.gov/litigation/complaints/comp18090.htm">as the SEC put it</a>, “baseless speculation and outright lies.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/how_to_spot_an_anarcho_capitalist/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/18/how_to_spot_an_anarcho_capitalist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>28</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;SNL&#8221; has a blue Christmas</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/snl_has_a_blue_christmas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/snl_has_a_blue_christmas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[martin short]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alec Baldwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kristen wiig]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul McCartney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandy Hook Elementary Shooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[entertainment news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13146376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a tribute to Sandy Hook, special guests galore and just the right amount of filth, "SNL" hits the right notes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The specter of Sandy Hook looms heavy this weekend, but "Saturday Night Live" proves time and again that they are at their best when they have to put on a show for a grieving nation. The somber cold open, with the New York Children's Chorus singing "Silent Night," paid quiet tribute to the 26 <a title="26 dead in Newtown, CT" href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/report_shots_fired_at_connecticut_elementary_school/" target="_blank">lives lost</a> on Friday while providing a necessary buffer for the episode that followed. It acknowledged, tastefully, how uncomfortable it can be to laugh in the wake of incomprehensible violence. But after the song finished, the screen faded to black and it was back to business as usual.</p><p><iframe src="http://www.hulu.com/embed.html?eid=ugkusii3lataosacrifera" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="512" height="288"></iframe></p><p>Actually, <em>better </em>business than usual.</p><p>SNL brought the winning combo of having a beloved alum Martin Short host the year's penultimate "SNL" (or the last one <em>ever</em>, if the Mayans are to be believed), and a Beatle! And the writers and cast really brought it. Alum shows tend to have a gaggle of surprise guests anyway, but with every celebrity on Earth in New York for the 12-12-12 Sandy relief <a title="12-12-12" href="http://www.121212concert.org/" target="_blank">concert</a>, this one packed heavier than usual star power.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/snl_has_a_blue_christmas/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/16/snl_has_a_blue_christmas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: SNL on the &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_the_fiscal_cliff/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_the_fiscal_cliff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal cliff]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13119655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama caves on tax cuts because Congress is bullying "this poor orange man" John Boehner]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saturday Night Live imagined Barack Obama caving on the "fiscal cliff" negotiations because John Boehner's colleagues turned on him at the hint of raising taxes. "Simply put, I felt sorry for this man."</p><p>"On Thursday, this man, this grown man was pushed into the Congressional ladies washroom. Naked from the waist down," Obama said, adding: "You leave this poor orange man alone."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.hulu.com/embed.html?eid=g6lghb2lzdiasrxwebv2ga" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_the_fiscal_cliff/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_the_fiscal_cliff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What do you mean, you don&#8217;t know who Gilda Radner is?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/what_do_you_mean_you_dont_know_who_gilda_radner_is/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/what_do_you_mean_you_dont_know_who_gilda_radner_is/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2012 19:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilda's Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilda Radner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13111396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["SNL" historians reintroduce the comic genius after some Gilda's Club chapters decide to drop her name ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was sad to hear that<a href="http://host.madison.com/news/local/health_med_fit/gilda-s-club-changing-name-as-fewer-know-namesake/article_0893171c-53c8-50bd-900f-6381aee41f71.html"> some chapters of the Gilda's Club cancer charities</a> have decided to drop Gilda Radner's name from their title because young people no longer know who she was. (<a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/a_gildas_club_loses_gilda/">See the Nov. 28 post by Salon columnist Mary Elizabeth Williams on the subject.</a>) We say that not just because we love Gilda's comedy, but because we liked who she was as a person. What many people don't realize is that there were some dramatic contrasts between the Gilda Radner you saw on "Saturday Night Live" and who she was behind the scenes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/what_do_you_mean_you_dont_know_who_gilda_radner_is/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/30/what_do_you_mean_you_dont_know_who_gilda_radner_is/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Gilda&#8217;s Club loses Gilda</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/a_gildas_club_loses_gilda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/a_gildas_club_loses_gilda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emma Stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilda Radner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilda's Club]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13109147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A cancer-care organization changes its name -- and fails to understand why support groups are named for people]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the mottos of Gilda's Club, the support organization for people with cancer and their friends and family, is "Come as you are." But if you're a member of the Madison, Wis., chapter, that all-encompassing message of acceptance must come with the codicil, "And who are you again?" It has recently announced that <a href="http://gawker.com/5963758/cancer-support-group-named-after-gilda-radner-changing-its-name-because-young-patients-dont-know-who-gilda-radner-is">it's changing its name</a>, because apparently people there don't know who Gilda Radner was.</p><p>Gilda's Club -- created in honor of the "Saturday Night Live" star who died in 1989 of ovarian cancer -- doesn't just take inspiration from the big-mouthed cartoon figure on its logo. It embodies Radner's open, playful spirit  in a clubhouse environment where parties are a regular occurrence and junior members are called Noogies. Yet Lannia Syren Stenz, the Madison club's executive director, told the Wisconsin State Journal Tuesday that "One of the realizations we had this year is that our college students were born after Gilda Radner passed, as <a href="http://host.madison.com/news/local/health_med_fit/gilda-s-club-changing-name-as-fewer-know-namesake/article_0893171c-53c8-50bd-900f-6381aee41f71.html#ixzz2DX21bUuN ">we are seeing younger and younger adults</a> who are dealing with a cancer diagnosis. We want to make sure that what we are is clear to them and that there’s not a lot of confusion that would cause people not to come in our doors."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/a_gildas_club_loses_gilda/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/28/a_gildas_club_loses_gilda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: SNL on Mitt&#8217;s defeat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_mitts_defeat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_mitts_defeat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2012 14:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Karl Rove]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13068722</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mitt laments his loss outside on the balcony, drowning his sorrows in milk]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week's Saturday Night Live imagined that Mitt Romney spent his election night party out on the balcony, secretly on a milk binge, while Paul Ryan did "feats of strength in the drawing room."</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.hulu.com/embed.html?eid=nsv1af3datp-nb6fkokccw" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_mitts_defeat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/11/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_mitts_defeat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;SNL&#8221; recap: Louis C.K. for President</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/snl_recap_louis_c_k_for_president/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/snl_recap_louis_c_k_for_president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis C.K.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hurricane Sandy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There were no political cameos in the weekend before the election, but the "SNL" host struck exactly the right tone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's the big weekend before Election Day, which for "Saturday Night Live" often involves a surprise political cameo — a final appeal for a candidate to voters to show us how funny and charming he or she can be. Four years ago, Sarah Palin dropped by Studio 8H, facing off with Tina Fey's fake Sarah Palin, and later, on "Weekend Update," she bopped merrily along as she was getting skewered by a very pregnant rapmaster, Amy Poehler. Obviously, it didn't help, but it didn't hurt her either.</p><p>There were no surprise guests on this edition of "SNL:" not Mitt, nor Paul. No Barry or Joe. Not even Chris Christie or Mike Bloomberg. This was Sandy's week, and just as the hurricane gave us a kind of reprieve from tedious 24-7 candidate-stumping coverage, so too did "SNL" keep it a lot lighter on political fare than you'd expect. This isn't to say the episode ignored the fact of Tuesday; it just didn't have that special edition feeling. It relied instead on its wonderfully droll host, Louis C.K., and Sandy, to set the tone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/snl_recap_louis_c_k_for_president/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/snl_recap_louis_c_k_for_president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must see morning clip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/must_see_morning_clip_57/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/must_see_morning_clip_57/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 11:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lincoln]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Louis CK]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062134</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Louis CK stars in the new sitcom Lincoln]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comedy god Louis CK and the awkwardness of being Honest Abe:</p><p><iframe id="nbc-video-widget" src="http://www.nbc.com/assets/video/widget/widget.html?vid=1422756" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/must_see_morning_clip_57/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/must_see_morning_clip_57/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Elliott: &#8220;&#8216;SNL&#8217; looks like a lot of fun but you&#8217;re constantly auditioning&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/chris_elliott_snl_looks_like_a_lot_of_fun_but_youre_constantly_auditioning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/chris_elliott_snl_looks_like_a_lot_of_fun_but_youre_constantly_auditioning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2012 18:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dave Hill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Letterman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Elliott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13046322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comic cult heroes Dave Hill and Chris Elliott discuss the brutal business of being funny]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last Wednesday, I had the honor of doing a live interview with one of my heroes — comedian, writer and actor Chris Elliott — at the Barnes and Noble in New York. I’ve been a fan of Chris’ since his first appearances on "Late Night With David Letterman" in the early 1980s, when he changed the face of late night television forever with such characters as “The Guy Under the Seats,” “The Fugitive Guy,” “Chris Elliott Jr.” and countless others I am rendered incontinent just thinking about.</p><p>Over the course of an hour or so, Chris and I discussed topics including but not limited to his groundbreaking work with Letterman, "Get a Life" (the greatest television show of all time), "Cabin Boy" (the greatest movie of all time), his time at "SNL," his Adult Swim series "Eagleheart," and, of course, his excellent new book "<a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/0399158405/?tag=saloncom08-20">The Guy Under the Sheets: The Unauthorized Biography,"</a> a hilarious and at times chilling tell-all that chronicles not only his show business exploits but also surprising encounters with John Gotti, the Beales of Grey Gardens, Aileen Wuornos and several others I just never saw coming. Chris is a comedic genius and I have incredible hair. I hope you enjoy our conversation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/chris_elliott_snl_looks_like_a_lot_of_fun_but_youre_constantly_auditioning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/22/chris_elliott_snl_looks_like_a_lot_of_fun_but_youre_constantly_auditioning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;We Killed&#8221;: Were women not funny until 1960?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/we_killed_were_women_not_funny_until_1960/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/we_killed_were_women_not_funny_until_1960/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gilda Radner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yael Kohen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joan Rivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Silverman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Bernhard]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13041261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where's Fanny Brice? Dorothy Parker? Glaring omissions are just one problem in this oral history of funny ladies]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> <p>Say it with me: Are women funny? Since this question was first answered in the negative in the pages of Vanity Fair by the late, redoubtable Christopher Hitchens, it seems to have been designated by the chattering classes as one of the great unanswerables of the universe, destined to be dredged up every time someone’s looking for page hits by pissing off the wrong person at some heavily trafficked and influential ladyblog (#sorryfeminists!). To everyone else, this may seem like a settled a matter of simple logic: Women are human beings (no matter what some Republican members of Congress might believe); some human beings are endowed with an innate talent to make others laugh; ergo, some women are funny. The end.</p> <p>And yet, it is with this specious query (if there is a God, then surely the fact that this piece of lazily reasoned hackwork seems destined to be the most quoted of all the Quotable Hitchens is His karmic revenge) that Yael Kohen chooses to open <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B008PBYVU/?tag=saloncom08-20">“We Killed: The Rise of Women in American Comedy,”</a> forcing from the beginning what could have been a transcendent and inspiring work of oral history into an oddly defensive crouch. What was almost certainly meant as a topical gambit — the book was born out of an article the author wrote for Marie Claire — feels a bit like reading a novel with a prologue like: “I know you’re probably wondering why you should care about anything I’m about to tell you since I just made it all up in my head, but please let me spend the next 300-plus pages trying to convince you!”</p> <p>Also strange is Kohen’s emphasis of focusing on her subjects’ relative shortcomings. Under this surely unconscious lens, a fanatically hardworking trailblazer like Joan Rivers is a frustrated actress who failed to take over the desk at “The Tonight Show” and curdled into a bitter insult comic; Carol Burnett, an unchallenging sketch comic; Lily Tomlin, an underground weirdo that nobody knew what to do with. Talents like Sandra Bernhard and Whoopi Goldberg are mostly heard complaining about getting stuck performing in the Belly Room, the all-female performance venue inside L.A’s former Comedy Store (which, in their descriptions of the narrow space and rickety staircase you had to take to get there, sounds like the world’s most hilarious <em>mechitza</em>), but little attention is paid to Goldberg’s subsequent blockbuster film career apart from her briefly noting a sleazy studio executive commenting distastefully on her inherent “unfuckability.” The hilarious Rachel Dratch is encouraged to talk about how affinity for playing unglamorous characters may have hurt her career. Others pontificate — not uncattily, may I add — on how a young Sarah Silverman got stage time because everyone wanted to sleep with her. Why talk to these extraordinary, successful, brilliant women, only to dwell disproportionately on their disappointments? Why treat them as a race apart, or explore their stories mainly relation to men? As Tina Fey, whose voice is notably absent here, said in her memoir “Bossypants” on what she says to young women who come looking to her for advice: “Remember: Don’t be fooled. You’re not in competition with other women. You’re in competition with everyone.”</p> <p>That’s not to say there’s not some great stuff here. “We Killed” is a well-meaning effort, at times even a noble one. Kohen clearly has a gift for drawing her subjects out: Merrill Markoe’s four-page, stunningly clear-eyed testimony on the rise and fall of her relationship with David Letterman is like a three-act play. Considering how she wound up making her fortune, all the snide comments about the young Kathy Griffin are good for cackle. And the ambitious chronology of the chapters deftly illustrate how the rise of women in comedy mirrored the rise of the women itself, from frustrated housewives to ambitious power-suited baby boomers to sexually frank post-feminists in heels and Spanx. The recurring theme of Johnny Carson’s appalling treatment of female comedians who broke his stringent rules of acceptability speaks a cathartic truth to power, even when the power in question is moldering in the grave.</p> <p>But for all the dazzling breadth of Kohen’s sources, “We Killed” remains notable for what it leaves out. In her telling, the story of women in American comedy began with Phyllis Diller and Elaine May sometime in the early 1960s. There’s no Fanny Brice or Sophie Tucker; no Dorothy Parker or Frances Marion or Anita Loos; no 1930s screwball heroines that put paid to the former Apatovian notion of the female as eternal straight man. Hollywood scarcely exists at all; the realms of theater and print are totally absent. The name “Nora Ephron” is not mentioned once. Lena Dunham, like robot maids or clothes that change color with your mood, is merely a shadow of a faraway and unknowable future.</p> <p>Of course, that’s the difficulty of the oral history: You can only talk to people who are alive, or about people who are in living memory, or are willing to talk to you. But if you’re trying to make a definitive case on the potential for hilarity of the double X chromosome, that seems like an awful lot to leave out.</p> <p>Which brings us to the second problem of writing only about what people want to tell you: It doesn’t leave a lot of room for outside analysis. We hear that Johnny Carson hated female comics and John Belushi refused to perform in anything he knew a woman had written. But neither Kohen nor anybody else tries very hard to explain why. Because ultimately, the question to ask isn’t whether women are funny; the question is why it’s so important to some men that they not be.</p> <p>Interestingly enough, it’s Christopher Hitchens himself who gives the game away in his essay that started a cottage industry, saying: “Men have to pretend, to themselves as well as to women, that they are not the servants and supplicants. Women, cunning minxes that they are, have to affect not to be the potentates … People in this precarious position do not enjoy being laughed at, and it would not have taken women long to work out that female humor would be the most upsetting of all.” Humor is power. We kill, and something inside them dies.</p> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/we_killed_were_women_not_funny_until_1960/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/16/we_killed_were_women_not_funny_until_1960/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/must_see_morning_clip_43/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/must_see_morning_clip_43/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2012 12:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vice Presidential debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Raddatz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13039997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live takes on the vice presidential debate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No matter where you live it is a "paradise compared to the burning coal heap that is Scranton Pennsylvania."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.nbc.com/assets/video/widget/widget.html?vid=1420805" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/must_see_morning_clip_43/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/14/must_see_morning_clip_43/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: &#8220;SNL&#8221; on the first debate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/07/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_the_first_debate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/07/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_the_first_debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Presidential Debates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 election]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13032908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Obama was thinking about during the debate, according to "Saturday Night Live"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Saturday Night Live" reenacted the first presidential debate, and offered one theory for President Obama's lack of energy. While Mitt Romney was going on about his plan for governing, with its "41 basic elements, six abrupt reversals of positions, and three outright lies," Obama had bigger things on his mind: "The anniversary gift! I can't believe I forgot the anniversary gift. This is bad."</p><p><iframe src="http://www.hulu.com/embed.html?eid=jvp9u9rgbk5dnithdf-fmw" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/07/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_the_first_debate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/07/must_see_morning_clip_snl_on_the_first_debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is &#8220;30 Rock&#8221; just &#8220;The Muppet Show&#8221; with humans?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/is_30_rock_just_the_muppet_show_with_humans/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/is_30_rock_just_the_muppet_show_with_humans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 13:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Henson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jane Krakowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Miss Piggy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kermit the frog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Muppet Show]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tina Fey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[30 Rock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lorne Michaels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13029584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The two comedies debuted 30 years apart, but their similarities are uncanny. Or are they?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the summer, while on vacation, my partner, Dustin, and I decided to watch the first season of “The Muppet Show.” We marveled at the guest stars — Juliet Prowse, Ruth Buzzi, Joel Grey.  And then we marveled at the way Kermit was troubleshooting an issue with Scooter, whose new dog demanded his own dressing room. And in a later episode, he was ego-massaging Miss Piggy. I realized … I was watching Liz Lemon.</p><p>"Liz Lemon is Kermit," I said to Dustin. "The Muppet Show" is "30 Rock"!</p><p>I tested my theory on a Facebook thread: Jenna is Miss Piggy. Kenneth is Scooter. Tracy is … possibly Gonzo? That was a tougher one to cast. On the thread, a friend led me to a<a href="http://bloglynch.blogspot.com/2009/06/30-rock-is-rip-off-of-muppet-show.html"> blog post</a> by comic-book writer Brian Lynch, from 2009. It turns out I was not the first person to have this revelation. Brian had some tough words for "30 Rock" — perhaps in jest (tone on the Internet can be hard to parse). He wrote, “Tina Fey's ‘30 Rock’ is currently the most acclaimed comedy series on television. It's won numerous Emmys and Golden Globes and I think Pulitzers. Critics and audiences alike love the show and its lovable zany characters, and consider it one of the most original comedies in years. And I guess it is original … if you've never seen ‘The Muppet Show.’ Because, my ‘friends’ (in quotes because I don't know or trust you, please don't be offended), Tina Fey's ‘30 Rock’ is quite obviously ripping off Jim Henson's beloved TV show.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/is_30_rock_just_the_muppet_show_with_humans/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/04/is_30_rock_just_the_muppet_show_with_humans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Obama too inscrutable to impersonate?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/is_obama_too_inscrutable_to_impersonate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/is_obama_too_inscrutable_to_impersonate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 19:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political impressions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key and Peele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jay Pharoah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Poehler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election season]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13023667</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama's blend of cool and reserve has proven tough to imitate, and it's dragging down "Saturday Night Live"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a comic, trying to impersonate the self-possessed, intellectual manner of President Obama is about as thankless a task as having the world leader’s job. It takes a level of mastery, creativity and maybe even a little perversion to chip away at Obama’s impenetrable reserve, and wedge your way into — or invent whole cloth — his inscrutable psyche. Keegan Michael Key and Jordan Peele, better known as Comedy Central’s comic duo Key and Peele, are arguably the best in the Obama-impression biz, with their “Obama’s Anger Translator” shtick: Peele plays Obama as the carefully compartmentalized, deliberately even-keeled, poised and well-spoken world leader, while Luther (Key), his unabashedly angry black sidekick — the id to the president's superego — parses the subtext of his words, and translates them into a profanity-laden raging tirade. <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u00noK0_iTY">(Here they are on the 47 percent.)</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/is_obama_too_inscrutable_to_impersonate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/29/is_obama_too_inscrutable_to_impersonate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>35</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As Kristen Wiig departs &#8220;SNL,&#8221; what&#8217;s next for women?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/as_kristen_wiig_departs_snl_whats_next_for_women/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/as_kristen_wiig_departs_snl_whats_next_for_women/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12923844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Saturday Night Live" says goodbye to a star -- and leaves late night without a queen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What, you didn't get to dance with Mick Jagger, hug Jon Hamm and be serenaded by Arcade Fire the last time you left a job? I guess you're not Kristen Wiig.</p><p>After seven years on "SNL," Wiig said goodbye on Saturday night's season finale that will go down as one of the sweetest, most choked-up moments on the show since <a href="http://classicajays.tumblr.com/post/7734859743/so-here-it-is-everyone-the-steve-martin-monologue">Steve Martin said goodbye to Gilda Radner</a> on the day of her death almost exactly 23 years earlier.</p><p>Even without an official announcement, Wiig's twirly, teary departure is enough to make even the most casual fans of the show <a href="http://perezhilton.com/2011-11-14-emma-stone-snl-adele-someone-like-you-sketch-video#.T7pCtnlYuSo">crank up the Adele</a> and mainline a tub of Edy's Grand. It doesn't matter that fellow castmates <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/gossip/kristen-wiig-jason-sudeikis-andy-samberg-ve-bid-bye-saturday-night-live-article-1.1081636#ixzz1vW0RD9cy">Andy Samberg and Jason Sudeikis have reportedly moved on</a> from the show as well. They leave behind established male cast members like Seth Meyers, Fred Armisen and Bill Hader. Wiig, on the other hand, blows a gaping hole in the show's female lineup. The 24-year-old Abby Elliott, who moves up the rung to the show's senior lady cast member, is now its biggest female star. But she's yet to display that versatility or command the clout that Wiig has. Kate McKinnon may yet bust out into full-blown "SNL" stardom, but she's only been on the show for five minutes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/as_kristen_wiig_departs_snl_whats_next_for_women/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/21/as_kristen_wiig_departs_snl_whats_next_for_women/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As &#8216;SNL&#8217; season ends, signs of a coming shift</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/as_snl_season_ends_signs_of_a_coming_shift/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/as_snl_season_ends_signs_of_a_coming_shift/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 04:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://http://www.dev12.salon.com/2012/05/16/as_snl_season_ends_signs_of_a_coming_shift/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With election season looming, SNL will have to quickly replace several departing regulars ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW YORK (AP) — How can "Saturday Night Live" possibly replace (fill in the blank)?</p><p>How many times have we asked that question across nearly four decades?</p><p>"Impossible!" said some in 2006 when Tina Fey, Chris Parnell, Horatio Sanz and Rachel Dratch headed for the door, only to be followed two years later by her friend and "Weekend Update" co-host Amy Poehler.</p><p>But in their wake grew one of the most versatile, multi-threat casts in "SNL" history, one that firmly established its own "SNL" era. Kristen Wiig, Andy Samberg, Bill Hader and Jason Sudeikis all became cast members in the 2005-2006 season, joining a group that already included Seth Meyers, Fred Armisen and Kenan Thompson.</p><p>At the time, "SNL" creator and executive producer Lorne Michaels pronounced them "the wave of the future" and Fey likened herself to a senior seeing "exciting freshmen" arrive. But as this latest season of the sketch institution comes to a close this Saturday night (with host Mick Jagger, and musical guests Arcade Fire and the Foo Fighters), there's a growing sense that another "SNL" class is nearing graduation.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/as_snl_season_ends_signs_of_a_coming_shift/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/as_snl_season_ends_signs_of_a_coming_shift/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hollywood&#8217;s worst screenwriter strikes again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/09/hollywoods_worst_screenwriter_strikes_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/09/hollywoods_worst_screenwriter_strikes_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam Sandler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12665001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The man behind "Click" and "Jack and Jill" also wrote Eddie Murphy's latest bomb. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The man behind "Click" and "Jack and Jill" also wrote Eddie Murphy's latest bomb. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/09/hollywoods_worst_screenwriter_strikes_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>119</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Was Lana Del Rey really that bad?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/17/was_lana_del_ray_really_that_bad/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/17/was_lana_del_ray_really_that_bad/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lana Del Rey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12182491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A disastrous "Saturday Night Live" turn derails pop music's latest girl]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just one week ago, Lana Del Rey was pop music's new It Girl, riding high on the hype from her "Hollywood sadcore" YouTube sensation "Video Games." Her lushly pouty <a href="http://youtu.be/Bag1gUxuU0g">"Born to Die"</a> was iTunes' pick for single of the week. And, with almost zero live experience, she landed the plum spot as musical guest on "Saturday Night Live." Then she got up and sang live on national television.</p><p>It took just moments for a scorching hot career to take an unexpected detour into the ditch of public scorn. Del Rey opened up her mouth and a collective "WTF?" went up across the land. Standing onstage with her glossy hair, dragon nails and slinky gown, she droned her way through "Video Games," swaying awkwardly, fiddling with her hair, and rubbing her hands on her thighs in a manner that seemed more "I'm just wiping off the palm sweat" than "Come over and feel me up, Big Boy." How bad was her performance? At one point she did a full 360 twirl. During a ballad.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/17/was_lana_del_ray_really_that_bad/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/17/was_lana_del_ray_really_that_bad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>97</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Saturday Night Live&#8221; phones it in, again</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/17/saturday_night_live_phones_it_in_again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/17/saturday_night_live_phones_it_in_again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Saturday Night Live]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12182321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a campaign so crazy that the jokes should write themselves, "SNL's" political humor has been flat and uninspired]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a week in which Mitt Romney's "I like to fire people" gaffe caught fire and fellow Republican candidates denounced him as a vulture capitalist, his campaign must have winced when they tuned into "Saturday Night Live" and saw Jason Sudeikis, as the GOP front-runner, sitting in a South Carolina diner. Turned out it had nothing to worry about -- <a href="http://www.nbc.com/saturday-night-live/video/mitt-romney-cold-open/1379094">on "SNL,"</a> Romney was the same mildly robotic guy as ever, only now he also liked to fire his breakfast. When his waitress asked him how he liked his eggs, Sudeikis-as-Romney cracked, "laid off."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/17/saturday_night_live_phones_it_in_again/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/17/saturday_night_live_phones_it_in_again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>