<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Scientific American</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/scientific_american/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:01:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>When exfoliation kills</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/when_exfoliation_kills_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/when_exfoliation_kills_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exfoliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[micro beads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbeads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13340405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microbeads used in many skin products are polluting the Great Lakes and directly harming marine life]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> Three of the five <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=not-so-great-lakes-cleanu">Great Lakes</a>—Huron, Superior and Erie—are awash in plastic. But it's not the work of a Christo-like landscape artist covering the waterfront. Rather, small plastic beads, known as micro plastic, are the offenders, according to survey results to be published this summer in <em>Marine Pollution Bulletin</em>. "The highest counts were in the micro plastic category, less than a millimeter in diameter," explained chemist Sherri "Sam" Mason of the State University of New York at Fredonia, who led the Great Lakes plastic pollution survey last July. "Under the scanning electron microscope, many of the particles we found were perfectly spherical plastic balls."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/when_exfoliation_kills_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/29/when_exfoliation_kills_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can money buy happiness after all?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/can_money_buy_happiness_after_all_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/can_money_buy_happiness_after_all_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard Business School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Dunn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happy Money]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gareth Cook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Norton]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13338941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scholars argue that how you spend is just as important as how much you spend]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> We live in America with two bits of contradictory received wisdom — that you’d be a lot better off if you made more money, and that money can’t buy you happiness. Now two scholars suggest another way of thinking about the relationship between cash and joy: To a large degree, how you spend is just as important as how <em>much</em> you spend. <a href="http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/profile.aspx?facId=326229&amp;facInfo=fea">Michael Norton</a>, an associate professor at Harvard Business School and coauthor – with <a href="http://dunn.psych.ubc.ca/">Elizabeth Dunn</a> – of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Happy-Money-Science-Smarter-Spending/dp/1451665067/ref=tmm_hrd_title_0/181-7319636-0911428">Happy Money</a>: The Science of Smarter Spending, answered questions from Mind Matters editor <a href="http://garethcook.net/">Gareth Cook</a>.</p><p><strong>Gareth Cook:</strong> What is the biggest misconception people have about the relationship between money and happiness?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/can_money_buy_happiness_after_all_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/27/can_money_buy_happiness_after_all_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Video game offers first (semi-)plausible zombie apocalypse</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/videogame_offers_first_plausible_zombie_narrative_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/videogame_offers_first_plausible_zombie_narrative_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Last of Us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zombies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[videogame]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13337892</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In "The Last of Us," humanity is all but wiped out by a parasitic fungus. The scenario isn't entirely far-fetched]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a></p><p>Pop culture is again in the quickly decaying grasp of a shambling horde. For how many times zombies have appeared, they rarely have a real scientific reason to. Sometimes it’s a supernatural cause as in <em>Dawn of the Dead</em>. Other times it’s a generic “zombie virus” as in <em>The Walking Dead</em> (though at least we know <a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/2013/03/25/the-komodo-dead-what-really-kills-in-the-walking-dead/">how a “walker” bite works</a>). In all the attempts to make the dead live again, science usually takes a back seat to the gore—at least until the latest popular iteration of zombies.<em>The Last of Us</em>—a new videogame <a href="http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/06/05/the-last-of-us-review">touted as a masterpiece</a>—has the most scientific explanation for zombies yet, because it uses zombies that <em>actually exist</em>.</p><p><strong>Mind Control and Fungus Art</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/videogame_offers_first_plausible_zombie_narrative_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/26/videogame_offers_first_plausible_zombie_narrative_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did natural selection wipe out Darwin&#8217;s frog?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/natural_selection_wiped_out_charles_darwins_frog_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/natural_selection_wiped_out_charles_darwins_frog_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Darwin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13332012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An unusual Chilean species discovered by the naturalist in 1834 appears to have vanished]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a></p><p>It looks like we’ve lost another one. The weird and unusual Chile Darwin’s frog (<em>Rhinoderma rufum</em>), whose tadpoles grew inside the vocal sacs of adult males, appears to be extinct: a four-year quest failed to turn up any evidence that the species still exists. The frogs were last seen in 1980.</p><p>As you might guess from its name, the Chile Darwin’s frog was discovered by naturalist Charles Darwin while he was traveling through South America in 1834. More than a century later scientists reclassified the mouth-brooding frogs—the only ones with this unique reproductive strategy—into two species, including the now-lost species that was native to northern Chile. The more simply named Darwin’s frog (<em>R. darwinii</em>) still exists farther south in ever-shrinking regions of Chile and Argentina.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/natural_selection_wiped_out_charles_darwins_frog_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/20/natural_selection_wiped_out_charles_darwins_frog_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Billion-dollar bioterror detection program under new scrutiny</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/billion_dollar_bioterror_detection_program_under_house_scrutiny_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/billion_dollar_bioterror_detection_program_under_house_scrutiny_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioterror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BioWatch program]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anthrax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biotechnology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13329896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An early warning alert system designed to sniff out airborne threats is being reviewed by a House subcommittee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logo: <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> A cutting-edge biological terror alert system detected a potential threat in the air one morning back in 2008, threatening to derail then-Sen. Barack Obama’s acceptance speech in Denver for his party’s presidential nomination at the Democratic National Convention. Initial results from a pricey national air sampling system suggested that bacteria that could cause tularemia had been detected. The microbe, <em>Francisella tularensis</em>, might have been weaponized to cause the infectious disease.</p><p>Public health officials sprang into action and tested further samples from the area that triggered the system, but turned up negative results. The alert, like others issued by the system in the past decade, was ruled to be a false alarm. Obama still made his acceptance speech that night, of course, in an open-air stadium as planned. But the system’s critics say BioWatch has repeatedly triggered an alarm when no threat has existed. Now the program faces the scrutiny of Congress.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/billion_dollar_bioterror_detection_program_under_house_scrutiny_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/18/billion_dollar_bioterror_detection_program_under_house_scrutiny_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China pilots programs to meet carbon targets</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/china_struggles_to_meet_carbon_emission_targets_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/china_struggles_to_meet_carbon_emission_targets_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shenzhen Special Economic Zone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cities across the country are imposing emissions limits on companies ranging from power plants to airport operators]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> On June 18 China’s pioneering city of Shenzhen is set to notch up another first. From that day 635 companies in the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone—which in 1979 became the vanguard for China’s capitalist revolution—will start using the <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=trading-greenhouse-gas-pollution">markets to help meet greenhouse gas emissions targets</a>.</p><p>This year, alongside the cities of Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin and Chongqing as well as the regions of Guangdong and Hubei, Shenzhen is imposing greenhouse gas targets on hundreds of companies, ranging from power <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=plants">plants</a> to airport operators. The goal is to develop a national carbon market over the next decade that could help put the brakes on the world’s largest carbon dioxide emitter.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/china_struggles_to_meet_carbon_emission_targets_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/china_struggles_to_meet_carbon_emission_targets_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How our brains separate empathy from disgust</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/empathy_and_disgust_are_adaptive_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/empathy_and_disgust_are_adaptive_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disgust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An injured rat, and our responses to it, offers clues to the adaptive nature of human behavior]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> Rats don't usually come out into daylight, especially not on a busy morning in New York City. But there it was, head awkwardly jutting out in front of its body, swinging from side to side. What injured the creature, I have no idea, but its hind legs could no longer support its weight. The rat dragged them like a kid drags a garbage bag that parents have asked be taken out–reluctantly. The muscles in the front legs rippled as they propelled the body forward along the sidewalk. The rodent was surprisingly quick considering the injury. But its aimlessness suggested distress.</p><p>Two girls, no more than 15 years old, spotted the wounded rat from about 10 feet away. They held each other close, squealing and giggling, inching toward the animal theatrically. Staring them down, I scowled. How could they not appreciate this creature’s suffering or be touched by its desperation? I looked on, saying nothing.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/empathy_and_disgust_are_adaptive_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/17/empathy_and_disgust_are_adaptive_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court rejects patents on 2 naturally occurring genes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/supreme_court_rejects_patents_on_two_naturally_occurring_genes_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/supreme_court_rejects_patents_on_two_naturally_occurring_genes_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 00:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angelina Jolie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRCA1]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13325935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ruling could lead to cheaper tests for individuals who may be at increased risk of developing cancer ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> When Angelina Jolie <a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/psysociety/2013/05/14/angelina-jolie-brca/">announced</a> last month that she decided to get a prophylactic double mastectomy, she based her decision on the presence of the <em>BRCA1</em> gene in her body—a gene that was detected via a costly medical test.</p><p>The Supreme Court today unanimously <a href="http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/12pdf/12-398_8njq.pdf">struck down</a> patents on <em>BRCA1 </em>and <em>BRCA2</em>—two genes linked to hereditary forms of breast and ovarian cancer—when the genes occur in the body. Myriad did not create or alter any of the genetic information of the <em>BCRA1</em> and <em>BRCA2</em> genes, and thus does not satisfy patenting requirements, according to the decision. “Myriad discovered the precise location and sequence of what are now known as the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes,” Justice Clarence Thomas wrote for the court.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/supreme_court_rejects_patents_on_two_naturally_occurring_genes_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/supreme_court_rejects_patents_on_two_naturally_occurring_genes_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What your brain won&#8217;t let you see</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/what_your_mind_wont_let_you_see_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/what_your_mind_wont_let_you_see_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cornell University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cambridge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research reaffirms our minds are riddled with unconscious biases and stereotypes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> It was a summer evening when Tony Cornell tried to make the residents of Cambridge, England see a ghost. He got dressed up in a sheet and walked through a public park waving his arms about. Meanwhile his assistants observed the bystanders for any hint that they noticed something strange. No, this wasn’t Candid Camera. Cornell was a researcher interested in the paranormal. The idea was first to get people to notice the spectacle, and then see how they understood what their eyes were telling them. Would they see the apparition as a genuine ghost or as something more mundane, like a bloke in a bed sheet?</p><p>The plan was foiled when not a single bystander so much as raised an eye brow. Several cows did notice, however, and they followed Cornell on his ghostly rambles. Was it just a fluke, or did people “not want to see” the besheeted man, as Cornell concluded in his 1959 report?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/what_your_mind_wont_let_you_see_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/what_your_mind_wont_let_you_see_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chimpanzees may finally gain full government protection</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/chimpanzees_may_finally_gain_full_government_protection_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/chimpanzees_may_finally_gain_full_government_protection_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chimpanzees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endangered Species Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Federal wildlife agency is making a bid to categorize captive-born chimps as "endangered" rather than "threatened"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> A long-in-place loophole that exempted captive-bred chimpanzees from the full protections of the Endangered Species Act may finally be closed, Dan Ashe, director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), announced on June 11.</p><p>For decades now, wild-born chimpanzees (<em>Pan troglodytes</em>) have been classified as “endangered” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). Captive-born chimps, on the other hand, have only been classified under the lesser category of “threatened.” Chimpanzees have been the only species with this “split list” status, which afforded the captive-bred apes significantly lower protections, as I wrote in <a href="http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/extinction-countdown/2011/09/07/should-captive-bred-chimpanzees-endangered-species-act-protection/">September 2011</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/chimpanzees_may_finally_gain_full_government_protection_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/chimpanzees_may_finally_gain_full_government_protection_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thomas Drake: The NSA will come after him with everything they&#8217;ve got</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/thomas_drake_the_nsa_will_come_after_him_with_everything_theyve_got_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/thomas_drake_the_nsa_will_come_after_him_with_everything_theyve_got_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Drake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edward Snowden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Surveillance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former whistle-blower explains surveillance algorithms and Edward Snowden's future job prospects]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> A National <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=security">Security</a> Agency whistleblower named <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/05/23/110523fa_fact_mayer?currentPage=all">Thomas Drake</a> was indicted several years ago for providing information to the press on waste, fraud and bureaucratic dysfunction in the agency’s counterterrorism programs. The U.S. Department of Justice indicted Drake, an NSA senior executive, under the Espionage Act of 1917 for retaining allegedly classified information. Eventually, the felony <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/10/usa-security-leak-idUSN1019889220110610">charges against Drake were dropped</a>, and he pled guilty to a misdemeanor, exceeding authorized use of a computer. Still, the DOJ’s strategy in that case may provide some clues as to what’s in store for Edward Snowden, a government contractor who <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/09/edward-snowden-nsa-whistleblower-surveillance">exposed himself last weekend</a> as the source for a widespread domestic communications story first reported by <em>The</em> <em>Guardian</em>. Drake spoke with <em>Scientific American</em> to shed some light on whistleblower prosecutions and the science behind surveillance.  An edited transcript of the conversation follows:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/thomas_drake_the_nsa_will_come_after_him_with_everything_theyve_got_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/thomas_drake_the_nsa_will_come_after_him_with_everything_theyve_got_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surgical masks for Ramadan? New virus has pandemic potential</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/surgical_masks_for_ramadan_new_virus_has_pandemic_potential_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/surgical_masks_for_ramadan_new_virus_has_pandemic_potential_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Health Organization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MERS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SARS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[umrah]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ramadan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13321999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[World health experts worry pilgrimage will spark global health crisis if Saudi Arabia stays mum about MERS virus]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a><br /> Over the next few weeks officials at the World Health Organization (WHO) face a tough and politically charged call. The Muslim month of fasting, Ramadan, begins July 9 and could draw as many as two million people from around the globe to the holy sites of Saudi Arabia in a pilgrimage called <em>umrah</em>. But a new disease, called Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome, or MERS, could threaten them.</p><p>Infectious disease control at mass gatherings is always a challenge, but this year even more so. Saudi Arabia is currently waging battle with MERS, yet it has released only the barest of details that scientists or public health officials could use to try to prevent its spread within Saudi Arabia or around the globe. In early May Saudi officials startled the world by announcing 13 new cases over the course of a few days. Since the start of May there have been 38 new cases worldwide—31 of them in Saudi Arabia—and 20 of the victims have died. With virtually no clues to draw on about where the virus lives in nature and how people contract it, WHO is trying to figure out what guidance to give those pilgrims, and the countries they will return to, about how to avoid infection and the international dissemination of a devastating new illness.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/surgical_masks_for_ramadan_new_virus_has_pandemic_potential_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/surgical_masks_for_ramadan_new_virus_has_pandemic_potential_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paleo diet is half-baked</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/paleo_diet_is_founded_more_on_privilege_than_logic_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/paleo_diet_is_founded_more_on_privilege_than_logic_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paleo diet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[caveman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hunter-gatherer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13319922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Basic biology dictates that there's no way we can eat exactly like our hunter–gatherer ancestors ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a><br /> Meet <a href="http://www.marksdailyapple.com/about-2/who-is-grok/#axzz2RD8Fzcjo">Grok</a>. According to his online profile, he is a tall, lean, ripped and agile 30-year-old. By every measure, Grok is in superb health: low blood pressure; no inflammation; ideal levels of insulin, glucose, <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=cholesterol">cholesterol</a> and triglycerides. He and his family eat really healthy, too. They gather wild seeds, grasses, and nuts; seasonal vegetables; roots and berries. They hunt and fish their own meat. Between foraging, building sturdy shelters from natural materials, collecting firewood and fending off dangerous predators far larger than himself, Grok's life is strenuous, perilous and physically demanding. Yet, somehow, he is a <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=stress">stress</a>-free dude who always manages to get enough <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/topic.cfm?id=sleep">sleep</a> and finds the time to enjoy moments of tranquility beside gurgling creeks. He is perfectly suited to his environment in every way. He is totally Zen.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/paleo_diet_is_founded_more_on_privilege_than_logic_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/09/paleo_diet_is_founded_more_on_privilege_than_logic_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>60</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Honey bees&#8217; greatest threat?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/monoculture_is_killing_our_honey_bee_colonies_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/monoculture_is_killing_our_honey_bee_colonies_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2013 18:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colonies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honey bees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monoculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waggle dance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13320036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Modern agricultural practices -- monoculture, specifically -- have led to a 30 percent decline in colonies yearly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a><br /> With all the talk of <a title="The Plight of the Honeybee" href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/13/130510-honeybee-bee-science-european-union-pesticides-colony-collapse-epa-science/" target="_blank">honey bee decline in the news</a>, you may already know that honey bees don’t just make honey. They also give us almonds, cherries, avocados, raspberries, apples…pretty much everything delicious. Of course, <a title="Native Pollinators in Agriculture" href="http://agpollinators.org/" target="_blank">there are plenty of native pollinators that can also do that job</a>. But domestic honey bees (first brought to the American continent in the 1600s) are great for large-scale agriculture for a couple of reasons. First, they live in huge colonies of tens of thousands of bees: one colony can visit 50,000 blossoms in a single day. Second, those colonies can easily be picked up and moved around to wherever they’re most needed. So the same bees that are used in February to pollinate almonds in California can be moved in April to pollinate cherries and apples in Washington state. Over a million honey bee colonies are moved around the US, going from crop to crop as they come into bloom.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/monoculture_is_killing_our_honey_bee_colonies_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/monoculture_is_killing_our_honey_bee_colonies_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Misery may be vital to our mental health</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/misery_may_be_vital_to_your_mental_health_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/misery_may_be_vital_to_your_mental_health_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[psychotherapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jonathan M. Adler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13318738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research suggests that experiencing negative emotions is good for our long-term well-being]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> A client sits before me, seeking help untangling his relationship problems. As a psychotherapist, I strive to be warm, nonjudgmental and encouraging. I am a bit unsettled, then, when in the midst of describing his painful experiences, he says, “I'm sorry for being so negative.”</p><p>A crucial goal of therapy is to learn to acknowledge and express a full range of emotions, and here was a client apologizing for doing just that. In my psychotherapy practice, many of my clients struggle with highly distressing emotions, such as extreme anger, or with suicidal thoughts. In recent years I have noticed an increase in the number of people who also feel guilty or ashamed about what they perceive to be negativity. Such reactions undoubtedly stem from our culture's overriding bias toward positive thinking. Although positive emotions are worth cultivating, problems arise when people start believing they must be upbeat all the time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/misery_may_be_vital_to_your_mental_health_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/06/misery_may_be_vital_to_your_mental_health_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t bug out, but your food is covered in insects</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/your_breakfast_of_champions_includes_bugs_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/your_breakfast_of_champions_includes_bugs_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 21:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nutrition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FDA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13318197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most food products contain FDA-approved levels of wings and thoraces -- and the UN says they're good for you!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a><br /> I grabbed a box of cereal out of my cabinet. The flakes smelled stale, but I was hungry enough. I poured a cup or two into a bowl, followed by a splash of milk. Well into my third bite, I knew that stale cereal wasn’t all I was eating. I saw <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thrips">thrips</a>—slender insects commonly known as corn lice—swimming in the bottom of the bowl, extending their legs in hopes of finding a flake—like a desperate swimmer in a flood. I immediately discarded the cereal, repulsed by the other bugs I had surely already eaten. But while I didn’t always see them, I had been eating bugs my whole life. So have you.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/your_breakfast_of_champions_includes_bugs_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/05/your_breakfast_of_champions_includes_bugs_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does finding your spouse online lead to a stronger marriage?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/does_meeting_your_spouse_online_lead_to_a_stronger_marriage_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/does_meeting_your_spouse_online_lead_to_a_stronger_marriage_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2013 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The National Academy of Sciences]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13316846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new study reveals that couples who meet on the web report a higher rate of marital satisfaction]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=where-does-identity-come-from"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> I met my husband at a party in a bygone era. He had no online profile. Neither did I. We didn’t trade email addresses, as neither of us had one of those either. He seemed like a good guy–and a party was as good a venue as any for meeting a future spouse. He still seems like a good guy and I rather doubt I would have done any better if I had dated online (assuming that had been an option). But I guess I’m old fashioned, as a new study suggests that, on average, we can do better if we find our spouse using a computer.</p><p>In the decades since that long-gone, offline era, people have increasingly been using the Internet to search for compatible partners. In by far the largest study of its type, social neuroscientist John Cacioppo at the University of Chicago and his colleagues report today in the <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences</em> that online meetings have resulted in a surprising number of successful marriages. From an online survey of 19,131 American adults who married between 2005 and 2012, the researchers revealed, for the first time, that a large proportion of marriages are emerging from online interactions. “I was astounded to see that over a third or marriages are now starting online. None of us knew that,” Cacioppo says.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/does_meeting_your_spouse_online_lead_to_a_stronger_marriage_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/04/does_meeting_your_spouse_online_lead_to_a_stronger_marriage_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>James Cameron: We&#8217;re still living in an age of exploration</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/james_cameron_were_still_living_in_an_age_of_exploration_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/james_cameron_were_still_living_in_an_age_of_exploration_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mariana Trench]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DeepSea Challenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kermadec Trench]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313949</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The director and deep sea explorer reflects on his voyage to Challenger Deep in the Mariana Trench]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a><br /> <em>Editor’s Note: This article is the first of a two-part Q&amp;A from a roundtable in which James Cameron discussed deep-ocean science with researchers at the Woods Hole </em><em>Oceanographic Institution in Cape Cod, Mass.</em></p><p>In March filmmaker and aquanaut James Cameron, back from his record-setting visit to the Challenger Deep in the Mariana Trench 11 kilometers below the surface of the Pacific Ocean, announced the <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=james-cameron-deepsea-challenger-donate-woods-hole" target="_blank">donation of his sub, </a><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=james-cameron-deepsea-challenger-donate-woods-hole" target="_blank"><em>DEEPSEA CHALLENGER,</em> to Woods Hole</a>, where scientists plan to use its cutting-edge technology to help further their understanding of life in ocean trenches.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/james_cameron_were_still_living_in_an_age_of_exploration_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/james_cameron_were_still_living_in_an_age_of_exploration_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where does identity come from?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/where_does_identity_come_from_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/where_does_identity_come_from_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Identity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julia Freund]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rfid]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A neuroscience experiment attempts to settle an ancient philosophical question. The tentative answer? Get out more]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=where-does-identity-come-from"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a> Imagine we rewound the tape of your life. Your diplomas are pulled off of walls, unframed, and returned. Your children grow smaller, and then vanish. Soon, you too become smaller. Your adult teeth retract, your baby teeth return, and your traits and foibles start to slip away. Once language goes, you are not so much you as <em>potential you</em>. We keep rewinding still, until we’re halving and halving a colony of cells, finally arriving at that amazing singularity: the cell that will become you.</p><p>The question, of course, is what happens when we press “play” again. Are your talents, traits, and insecurities so deeply embedded in your genes that they’re basically inevitable? Or could things go rather differently with just a few tiny nudges? In other words, how much of your fate do you allot to your genes, versus your surroundings, versus chance? This is navel gazing that matters.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/where_does_identity_come_from_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/30/where_does_identity_come_from_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three tips for training your mind to eat healthier</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/we_are_unconsciously_ruining_our_health_goals_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/we_are_unconsciously_ruining_our_health_goals_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2013 21:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scientific American]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthy food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anxiety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Pennsylvania]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-control]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13311080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Research shows that subconscious feelings of uncertainty or anxiety can affect our food choices]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/image002.jpeg" alt="Scientific American" align="left" /></a><br /> Plans for working out and eating well often go awry, and the reasons for those lapses are not always obvious. Three new papers highlight unconscious influences that affect our choices.</p><p><strong>Watch Out for Uncertainty</strong></p><p>A job search or medical testing can breed doubts about the future, which in turn can interfere with our food choices. In one recent paper, being made to feel uncertain led people to select brownies over fruit. “Uncertainty appears to affect people by sapping the same kind of attention resources required to exert self-control,” says Katherine L. Milkman of the University of Pennsylvania and an author of the study in Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. To counteract this effect, be mindful of situations that cause uncertainty and be aware that uncertainty can feel like fear, worry or anxiety. Accepting a lack of insight into the future as a part of life can help you spend less energy thinking about it, saving up self-control for decision making.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/we_are_unconsciously_ruining_our_health_goals_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/28/we_are_unconsciously_ruining_our_health_goals_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>