<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Scott Brown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/scott_brown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Another Massachusetts meltdown?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/another_mass_meltdown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/another_mass_meltdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 19:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martha Coakley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12916203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren's recent struggles have some Democratic operatives worried about a Martha Coakley redux]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story about Elizabeth Warren's Native American heritage refuses to die. Today, state Republicans are calling on Harvard to investigate whether Warren used her Native American status to land her teaching post. Some Democrats, haunted by the infamous meltdown of Martha Coakley against Scott Brown two years ago, are wondering if it’s déjà vu all over again.</p><p>"The people in Washington are saying, 'The people in Massachusetts are a bunch of fuck-ups who couldn't run a race for dog catcher,'" said one veteran Massachusetts Democratic insider. "This is someone they handpicked, filled the coffers with millions and millions of dollars, made it their number one race, and the people who are up here running it with every resource you would ever want are getting killed."</p><p>The Boston Herald broke the story April 27 that Harvard touted Warren’s Indian ancestry, and it’s been downhill since for the Senate hopeful. A genealogist has suggested Warren is 1/32 Native American, although the campaign has not provided documents backing her claim. Warren spoke in one interview of grandparents with “high-cheekbones.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/another_mass_meltdown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/07/another_mass_meltdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Olympia Snowe gives Obama an &#8220;F&#8221; in &#8220;paying attention to Olympia Snowe&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/olympia_snowe_gives_obama_an_f_in_paying_attention_to_olympia_snowe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/olympia_snowe_gives_obama_an_f_in_paying_attention_to_olympia_snowe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12742931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Retiring moderate Republican senator still prizes "bipartisanship" over actually passing legislation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Retiring Sen. Olympia Snowe has finished grading the president's report card. <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-players-abc-news/frustrated-senator-olympia-snowe-gives-obama-f-101657433.html">President Obama gets an "F" in bipartisanship</a>, where "bipartisanship" is defined as "constantly stroking the fragile egos of self-important Senate moderates."</p><p>Snowe is not seeking reelection because the Republican Party wholly merged with the conservative movement and then began enforcing much stricter party discipline than it had in the past, and she would likely lose a primary election to a more right-wing candidate. But in her high-minded version of what happened, she is leaving because of "partisanship," an evil spell cast on the formerly fraternal and cooperative United States Senate by comity-hating wizards.</p><p>This is how bad things have gotten: <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/power-players-abc-news/frustrated-senator-olympia-snowe-gives-obama-f-101657433.html">President Obama hasn't called her in almost two years!</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/olympia_snowe_gives_obama_an_f_in_paying_attention_to_olympia_snowe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/olympia_snowe_gives_obama_an_f_in_paying_attention_to_olympia_snowe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>40</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Brown&#8217;s triumphant makeover</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/08/scott_browns_mainstream_move/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/08/scott_browns_mainstream_move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12644091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Massachusetts senator has pulled ahead of Elizabeth Warren in the polls by running away from the Tea Party]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The so-called <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/25/super_pacs_not_welcome_in_massachusetts_senate_race/" target="_blank">People’s Pledge</a> seemed like a somewhat gimmicky win-win proposition for both incumbent Republican Sen. Scott Brown and his Democratic challenger, Harvard professor Elizabeth Warren, in their race for the seat once held by Ted Kennedy. The idea, proposed by Brown, was to staunch the flow of super PAC money into the race with an agreement of elegant simplicity: If a candidate is attacked by name in an ad, then the one who comes off looking better is obliged to donate half the cost of the ad buy to a charity of the other candidate's choice. Pretty simple: Why shoot yourself in the foot, right?</p><p>The trick in the gimmick became clear this week when Brown announced that he was holding up his end of the pledge, agreeing to pay half the costs of an ad from a group called Coalition of Americans for Political Equality (CAPE PAC) and asking it to pull its Google ads promoting him. The group's <a href="www.vote4brown.org">website</a> is now offline. Jeff Loyd, a Tea Party activist from Arizona who chairs the PAC, confirmed that his group spent all of $673.99 in pro-Brown online advertising with Google.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/08/scott_browns_mainstream_move/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/08/scott_browns_mainstream_move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super PACs not welcome in Massachusetts Senate race</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/25/super_pacs_not_welcome_in_massachusetts_senate_race/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/25/super_pacs_not_welcome_in_massachusetts_senate_race/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campaign Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12231441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Elizabeth Warren and Scott Brown pledge to discourage independent attack ads. Will it work?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BOSTON—If there’s a lonely glimmer of hope in the gloom and doom over money in politics, it was born this week in Boston with the signing of <a href="http://elizabethwarren.com/peoplespledge?sc=ad_g_ma_s_pp_b&amp;gclid=CIus-rmr6q0CFYPc4Aodshax5g" target="_blank"><span style="color: #0000ff;">the People’s Pledge agreement  </span></a>to extinguish the onslaught of SuperPac ads polluting the Massachusetts airwaves, ten months before the nation’s most closely watched Senate race comes to an end.</p><p>The brainchild of Harvard Professor Elizabeth Warren, the darling of the left—yet prompted by Senator Scott Brown, the Tea Party centerfold who took Ted Kennedy's seat—the key enforcement mechanism is remarkably simple in its conception: the candidate favored in a third-party ad on TV, radio or online must make a contribution worth half of the ad’s costs to the opposing candidate’s charity of choice within three days of broadcast.</p><p>The negative air war that was predicted two years ago as a consequence of the Supreme Court’s Citizens United ruling could very well be thwarted in this one key race. It’s the little engine that could, nationally, but if the Massachusetts experiment in self-punishment proves enforceable here, it could catch on elsewhere, sort of like the Pledge of Allegiance against dirty politics, a yardstick that blunts the worst consequences of the high court’s decision.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/25/super_pacs_not_welcome_in_massachusetts_senate_race/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/01/25/super_pacs_not_welcome_in_massachusetts_senate_race/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The danger of being a talk radio hero</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/the_danger_of_being_a_talk_radio_hero/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/the_danger_of_being_a_talk_radio_hero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 22:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10104839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Brown's crude put-down of Elizabeth Warren threatens the image he's tried so hard to create]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>(Updated)</strong></p><p>You've probably already heard about Senator Scott Brown's gaffe this morning. Asked about a statement by Elizabeth Warren, his likely Democratic opponent next year, that she (<a href="http://www.cosmopolitan.com/celebrity/news/scott-brown-nude-in-cosmo">unlike Brown</a>) hadn't posed nude to help pay her way through college, Brown <a href="http://wzlx.radio.com/2011/10/06/senator-scott-brown-calls-in/">replied</a>: "Thank God."</p><p>Needless to say, it's landed Brown in some hot water, with Democrats <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/scott-brown-on-elizabeth-warrens-claim-she-kept-her-clothes-on-during-college-thank-god/2011/03/03/gIQATkHCQL_blog.html">blasting him</a> for engaging in "frat house" chauvinism and media outlets across the country <a href="http://news.google.com/news/more?q=Scott+Brown&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=imvnsuol&amp;bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.,cf.osb&amp;biw=1440&amp;bih=732&amp;um=1&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;ncl=d3UawfV7sLkodnMogkeaTrRYtfkZM&amp;ei=cO6NToWlOIby0gHZ0dQg&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=news_result&amp;ct=more-results&amp;resnum=1&amp;ved=0CCwQqgIwAA">picking up</a> the story. This comes at a bad time for Brown, whose <a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/03/31/scott_brown_2012_poll/">once-mighty standing</a> in Massachusetts has eroded and who is now <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/post/scott-brown-on-elizabeth-warrens-claim-she-kept-her-clothes-on-during-college-thank-god/2011/03/03/gIQATkHCQL_blog.html">running even</a> with Warren in polls, and could be particularly damaging since it threatens to undermine what has been the key to his popularity in blue state Massachusetts: His personal likability.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/the_danger_of_being_a_talk_radio_hero/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/the_danger_of_being_a_talk_radio_hero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Elizabeth Warren&#8217;s dream and nightmare scenarios</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/14/elizabeth_warren_senate_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/14/elizabeth_warren_senate_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/09/14/elizabeth_warren_senate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will Massachusetts voters throw out a Republican senator they like personally because they hate his party?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elizabeth Warren is now <a href="http://bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2011/09/14/warren-seek-brown-senate-seat/sGpR0TIJE4ZTJ4MneHb4WN/story.xml">officially off and running</a> for the United States Senate, and while there's technically no guarantee that she'll even win the Democratic nomination (several other candidates have been running for months), it may not be much an exaggeration to say that her party's hopes of hanging on to the U.S. Senate depend on her.</p><p>Right now, Democrats own a 53-47 majority in the chamber, but around ten of their seats are vulnerable or potentially vulnerable in next year's elections. Republicans, by contrast, will only have to defend ten seats in 2012 and almost all of them look safe for the GOP. Scott Brown's Massachusetts seat is one of the two obvious exceptions right now (Nevada is the other). So if Warren lives up to her hype, it could change the national math decisively.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/14/elizabeth_warren_senate_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/14/elizabeth_warren_senate_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Warren&#8217;s Massachusetts prospects aren&#8217;t as bright as you might assume</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/elizabeth_warren_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/elizabeth_warren_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/18/elizabeth_warren_senate</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren looks poised to run for the Senate in Massachusetts, but her odds aren't as good as you think]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that she's officially been passed over to head the Consumer Financial Protection Board, Elizabeth&#160;Warren seems likely to run for the U.S. Senate in Massachusetts, where Republican Scott Brown's seat will be up in 2012. "If she gets in," NBC's <a href="http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/07/18/7104621-first-thoughts-holding-pattern">First Read opined on Monday</a>, "it could rival Kaine-Allen as the marquee Senate race of 2012."</p><p>Well, maybe.</p><p>Warren is certainly popular among progressive activists who follow Washington closely, who see her as an unusually smart, principled and assertive thorn in&#160;Wall Street's side. Of course, Senate Republicans fear her for the same reason, which is why President Obama opted not to nominate her to run the CFPB. As a candidate for office, it's likely that Warren would enjoy significant financial support from her national fans.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/elizabeth_warren_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/18/elizabeth_warren_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The unbeatable Republican?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/scott_brown_2012_poll/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/scott_brown_2012_poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/31/scott_brown_2012_poll</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon exclusive: Secret Democratic poll finds shocking popularity for Scott Brown]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Massachusetts is a deeply Democratic state, one in which barely more than 15 percent of the seats in the state Legislature are held by Republicans and fewer than 15 percent of all registered voters belong to the GOP. So it's hardly surprising that national Democrats have been making noise about defeating the state's Republican senator, Scott Brown, when he stands for reelection next year.</p><p>"It's a priority for us," Guy&#160;Cecil, the executive director of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/articles/2011/03/15/mass_democrats_see_chance_to_unseat_brown/">told the Boston Globe</a> when he made a two-day trip to the Bay State earlier this month.</p><p>But the DSCC received some bad news this week when a poll it commissioned found that Brown's popularity is soaring. The survey, which has been seen by at least one D.C. insider and was detailed for Salon, measured Brown's approval rating at 73 percent -- easily surpassing the scores for Barack Obama and the state's two top&#160;Democrats,&#160; Gov. Deval Patrick and Sen. John Kerry. It also found him running over the magic 50 percent mark against every potential Democratic challenger, and crushing the strongest perceived Democrats (Reps. Michael Capuano and Ed Markey and former Rep. Marty Meehan) by double-digit margins. The results only grew closer when respondents were primed with negative information about Brown.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/scott_brown_2012_poll/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/31/scott_brown_2012_poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>58</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Brown begs for money from David Koch</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/07/scott_brown_koch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/07/scott_brown_koch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 20:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/03/07/scott_brown_koch</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Massachusetts senator is caught on tape asking for reelection help from the billionaire industrialist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, this is embarrassing. At a fancy party for a cancer research institute at MIT last week, <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2011/03/07/scott-brown-david-koch-money/">Think Progress caught Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown begging for money</a> from billionaire industrialist David Koch. Koch and his brother Charles are the wealthy backers of much of the modern conservative and libertarian movements, and their money helped elect Republicans nationwide in 2010. They have since become the semiofficial bogeymen of the left, because they fit the part of "evil wealthy industrialists buying a pliant government" quite well.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/07/scott_brown_koch/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/07/scott_brown_koch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Brown: The new face of sex abuse survivors</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/scott_brown_sex_abuse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/scott_brown_sex_abuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/02/17/scott_brown_sex_abuse</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Republican Massachusetts senator reveals a "traumatic" past -- and faces a surprising backlash]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every president, every prime minister, every CEO, every powerful pundit was once an innocent child. That may sound obvious, but whether the person is a great leader or a loathsome despot or someone somewhere in between, when you look at him on the evening news, it's unlikely you're thinking about a 10-year-old boy, heading off to summer camp on Cape Cod. But 40 years ago, ambitious Republican senator from Massachusetts Scott Brown was such a boy. And there, he says, that young boy was sexually abused at the hands of a counselor who threatened to kill him if he ever revealed their secret.</p><p>In his forthcoming memoir, "Against All Odds: My Life of Hardship, Fast Breaks, and Second Chances," Brown makes a powerful case for his book's hardscrabble title. He details the beatings he and his mother received at the hands of his stepfather, describing how at age 6 his stepfather "pounded my head, my back, and plowed into me with those massive knuckles and flat, sandpapery palms until I was shaking and sobbing and snot was pouring out of my nose" and threatened to kill him. He discusses being 8 and having a local teen menace him with a knife and order him to perform a sexual act -- and how he escaped. And he writes of a counselor at his religious camp who sexually abused him. "I was standing there with my pants down and he came right up next to me and asked me if I needed help, and then he reached out his hand," he writes, adding that the man told him "that if I told anybody, ever, he'd hurt me badly." In an interview for Sunday's "60 Minutes," Brown cryptically reveals, "Fortunately, nothing was ever fully consummated, so to speak, but it was certainly, back then, very traumatic." Surely adding to the trauma was the counselor's warning that, as Brown says, "If you tell anybody I'll kill you. I will make sure nobody believes you." And so, Brown says he kept the secret all these years, telling Lesley Stahl that his mother will learn of the incident for the first time when she reads his book.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/scott_brown_sex_abuse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/17/scott_brown_sex_abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Scott Brown reveals he was sexually abused as child</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/16/scott_brown_sexual_abuse/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/16/scott_brown_sexual_abuse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual abuse]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/02/16/scott_brown_sexual_abuse</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Massachusetts senator drops the bombshell in "60 Minutes" interview to air this Sunday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Scott Brown has revealed he was sexually abused as a child several times by a camp counselor and has detailed physical abuse by a stepfather.</p><p>The Republican senator from Massachusetts made the revelations in an interview to air Sunday night on the CBS program "60 Minutes."</p><p>Brown says the camp counselor threatened to kill him if he disclosed the sexual abuse.</p><p>"He said, 'If you tell anybody ... I'll kill you. I will make sure nobody believes you,'" Brown said in the interview.</p><p>
    <embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" background="#333333" flashvars="si=254&amp;uvpc=http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/uvp_cbsnews.xml&amp;contentType=videoId&amp;contentValue=50100376&amp;ccEnabled=false&amp;hdEnabled=false&amp;fsEnabled=true&amp;shareEnabled=false&amp;dlEnabled=false&amp;subEnabled=false&amp;playlistDisplay=none&amp;playlistType=none&amp;playerWidth=425&amp;playerHeight=239&amp;vidWidth=425&amp;vidHeight=239&amp;autoplay=false&amp;bbuttonDisplay=none&amp;playOverlayText=PLAY%20CBS%20NEWS%20VIDEO&amp;refreshMpuEnabled=true&amp;shareUrl=http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7355810n&amp;adEngine=dart&amp;adPreroll=true&amp;adPrerollType=PreContent&amp;adPrerollValue=1" height="279" salign="lt" scale="noscale" src="http://cnettv.cnet.com/av/video/cbsnews/atlantis2/cbsnews_player_embed.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425"></embed>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/16/scott_brown_sexual_abuse/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/16/scott_brown_sexual_abuse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And the Tea Party&#8217;s next target is &#8230; Scott Brown?!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/27/scott_brown_tea_party/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/27/scott_brown_tea_party/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Parties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/27/scott_brown_tea_party</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Look what happens when a senator from Massachusetts starts voting like ... a senator from Massachusetts]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was probably inevitable that we'd reach this point, but Tea Party activists and social conservative activists are <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2010/12/24/brown_draws_ire_on_the_right/">now talking openly</a> about backing a Republican primary challenger against Scott Brown in 2012.</p><p>"I think that there will be a primary challenge," Christen Varley, president of the Greater Boston Tea Party, told the Boston Globe last Friday. "There&#8217;s enough of an underground movement in the Tea Party movement as seeing him as not being conservative enough. There probably will be multiple people who attempt to run against him."</p><p>Brown's latest (supposed) crimes against conservatism include <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/12/03/scott_brown_dadt">his support</a> for the New Start treaty and for repeal of the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy in the Senate last week -- this after he <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/07/12/scott-brown-vote-for-fina_n_643130.html">voted for</a> Wall&#160;Street reform over the summer and <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-6235168-503544.html">a jobs bill</a> back in February.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/27/scott_brown_tea_party/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/27/scott_brown_tea_party/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who (and what) could still trip up DADT repeal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/dadt_senate_prospects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/dadt_senate_prospects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/16/dadt_senate_prospects</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least 60 senators now say they are ready to vote for repeal. Let's see how serious they are]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhat amazingly, it now seems more likely than not that the military's <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/12/most_back_repealing_dont_ask_d.html">widely loathed</a> "don't ask, don't tell" policy will be repealed in the coming days.</p><p>This outcome was hard to imagine just a week ago, when -- not for the first time -- repeal proponents were unable to muster 60 votes to end a GOP-led filibuster of a Defense Authorization bill that included repeal language. But immediately after that failed cloture vote, Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins announced their plans to file a new, stand-alone repeal bill. The House then swung into action, passing an identical repeal bill on Wednesday, and now four moderate Republicans -- Collins, Olympia Snowe, Scott Brown and Lisa Murkowski -- <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/12/report-scott-brown-and-lisa-murkowski-back-dadt-repeal.php?ref=fpa">are indicating</a> they'll support the new measure. On paper, that means there are now 61 votes for repeal (counting Blanche Lincoln, the Arkansas Democrat who says she missed last week's cloture vote because of a dentist appointment).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/dadt_senate_prospects/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/16/dadt_senate_prospects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; vote will happen in lame duck</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/dadt_vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/dadt_vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/13/dadt_vote</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A stand-alone bill repealing the discriminatory policy will come to the floor soon, according to a Senate source]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Susan Collins/Joe Lieberman stand-alone "don't ask, don't tell" repeal bill should come to a vote "later this week or early next week," <a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/255158/hill-buzz-stand-alone-dadt-repeal-robert-costa">according to a "senior Senate aide" who spoke to the National Review's Robert Costa.</a></p><p>Meanwhile, three former service members <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/federal-eye/2010/12/with_repeals_fate_uncertain_ne.html">have filed suit in federal court</a> arguing that the policy is unconstitutional. And the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network has two more lawsuits in the pipeline. Repeal via the courts <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/plum-line/2010/12/the_courts_will_repeal_dadt_if.html">looks more likely now</a> than it ever has before. While Republicans might enjoy that, because it would give them a chance to complain about activist judges, the Pentagon -- and lawmakers like Sen. Lieberman -- would much prefer legislative repeal to judicial repeal.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/dadt_vote/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/13/dadt_vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221; repeal is, as always, in trouble</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/0next_for_dadt1/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/0next_for_dadt1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/10/0next_for_dadt1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Joe Lieberman will push a stand-alone bill, but delay and process complaints could still doom its chances]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa Murkowski explained her vote against proceeding with debate on the defense authorization bill that included the repeal of "don't ask, don't tell": She voted no <a href="http://newsminer.com/bookmark/10608399-Alaska-Sen-Murkowski-qualifies-%E2%80%98don%E2%80%99t-ask%E2%80%99-vote-">because she wants an "open and fair amendment process."</a> Scott Brown voted no because <a href="http://www.wwlp.com/dpp/news/massachusetts/Brown-votes-to-block-DADT-debate">he refuses to vote yes until Democrats acquiesce to tax cuts for the wealthy.</a></p><p>Nothing better illustrates the moral vacuity of the United States Senate than when a broadly popular measure receives a majority of votes but still fails because senators who claim to support the measure vote to block it for process reasons. (Besides, I guess, when something horrible passes with broad bipartisan support.)</p><p>Thankfully, Senate comity could still prevail! Joe Lieberman and Susan Collins decided to bring a stand-alone bill on repealing the policy to the floor as soon as possible, which, in Senate time, means not that soon. Harry Reid says he'll get it done before the end of the year, but a stand-alone bill would have to be passed by the House and go through conference committee and our "moderate" GOP friends could still come up with serious reasons to delay the vote for just a little bit longer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/0next_for_dadt1/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/10/0next_for_dadt1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Scott Brown boxed in on DADT?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/03/scott_brown_dadt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/03/scott_brown_dadt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Don't Ask Don't Tell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/12/03/scott_brown_dadt</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Massachusetts Republican sounds like he'll support repeal -- but he has more wiggle room than you think]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>[Updated]</strong> Scott Brown said earlier this year that he was opposed to repealing "don't ask, don't tell," but that he would keep an "open mind" when the Pentagon released its report on the subject -- which <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/11/30/dont_ask_dont_tell_review">it finally did</a> earlier this week. Now, Massachusetts' Republican senator <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2010/12/03/brown_says_honor_not_sexuality_matters/">seems to be</a> coming around:</p><blockquote>
<p>"I&#8217;ve been to many funerals, unfortunately, in my home state, for those soldiers," Brown, a Massachusetts Republican, told Pentagon leaders at a Senate Armed Services hearing. "And one thing I never asked was: Are they -- are they gay or straight? It never even crossed my mind, to be honest with you. I just wanted to know if they -- if they gave their limb or their life, you know, with pride and with honor for our country.&#8217;"</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/12/03/scott_brown_dadt/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/12/03/scott_brown_dadt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Republicans begin carving up bank reform</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/04/spencer_bachus_wall_streets_man_in_washington/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/04/spencer_bachus_wall_streets_man_in_washington/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2010 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Bailouts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/11/04/spencer_bachus_wall_streets_man_in_washington</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How voters angry at Wall Street succeeded in putting the banks back in control]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Citing their anger at what the "banks" had done to the U.S. economy as a key motivating force, American voters put Republicans back in control of the House of Representatives on Tuesday. As a consequence, the man most likely to replace Barney Frank, D.-Mass, as chairman of the House Financial Services Committee is Spencer Bachus, R.-Ala. Bachus, <a href="http://www.publicintegrity.org/articles/entry/2617/">reports the Center for Public Integrity,</a> received well over a million dollars from political action committees representing banks, insurance companies and auditors over the past two election cycles. And wasting no time, on Wednesday, <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fd581e3e-e7a2-11df-8ade-00144feab49a.html">reports the Financial Times,</a> Bachus sent <a href="http://media.ft.com/cms/d983eaa6-e793-11df-8ade-00144feab49a.pdf">a letter to the Financial Stability Oversight Council</a> -- the government agency charged with implementing the <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/bank_reform/index.html">Dodd-Frank bank reform bill</a> -- that reads as if dictated by bank lobbyists.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/04/spencer_bachus_wall_streets_man_in_washington/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/04/spencer_bachus_wall_streets_man_in_washington/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Where liberalism lives</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/massachusetts_deval_patrick/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/massachusetts_deval_patrick/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deval Patrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/11/03/massachusetts_deval_patrick</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Brown's January victory is a distant memory in Massachusetts after last night]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember how this all started -- back in January, when we all looked up, shocked to discover a Republican on the verge of winning the Senate seat Ted Kennedy had previously held for more than 46 years?</p><p>Scott Brown&#8217;s triumph in Massachusetts' Jan. 19 special election, the first Republican victory in a Bay State Senate race since 1972, was the first clear, indisputable evidence how toxic the combination of soaring joblessness and total Democratic control of Washington could be for the party this year. That combination resulted in the GOP&#8217;s takeover of the House on Tuesday night, with the party gobbling up around 60 Democratic-held seats, and its significant gains in the Senate -- a pickup of six seats, it appears. Republicans also gained numerous governorships and state legislative chambers.</p><p>But, curiously enough, there&#8217;s one place where they didn&#8217;t do much winning on Tuesday night: Massachusetts.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/massachusetts_deval_patrick/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/11/03/massachusetts_deval_patrick/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>31</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC&#8217;s glowing, hilarious ode to Chris Christie</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/chris_christie_today_show_ode/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/chris_christie_today_show_ode/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/10/21/chris_christie_today_show_ode</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A "Today" reporter's worshipful portrait of the New Jersey governor (and her story on Scott Brown's dreaminess)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Jersey Governor Chris Christie gets fawning press coverage because his blunt, no-nonsense style screams "authenticity" on TV (and because in a year where the press narrative is "Republicans resurgent," he is one of the very few prominent Republicans who is actually popular and not particularly embarrassing). But even by the standards of softball coverage of popular first-year pols, yesterday's Today Show profile of the governor is completely ridiculous: <object classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=10,0,0,0" height="245" id="msnbc95891f" width="420"><param name="movie" value="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" /><param name="FlashVars" value="launch=39756958&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="wmode" value="opaque" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="launch=39756958&amp;width=420&amp;height=245" height="245" name="msnbc95891f" pluginspage="http://www.adobe.com/shockwave/download/download.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32545640" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="420" wmode="opaque"></embed></object></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/chris_christie_today_show_ode/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/21/chris_christie_today_show_ode/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>State aid bill passes Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/04/senate_state_aid_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/04/senate_state_aid_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympia J. Snowe, R-Maine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan M. Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/08/04/senate_state_aid_bill</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A scaled-down, food stamp-slashing, paid-for aid bill squeaks through with help from Maine's Republicans]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate approved cloture on Harry Reid's state aid bill minutes ago by a vote of 61-38, with nude Massachusetts Republican Scott Brown voting no and Democratic troll Ben Nelson -- along with both of <a href="http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Issues/Budget-Impact/2010/07/16/David-Obey-I-Leave-More-Discontented-Than-I-Started.aspx">the two crown princesses from Maine</a> -- voting yes. So teachers in Nevada and Maine will not be fired, and states will be able to pay their Medicaid bills for six months.</p><p>(Assuming the House approves this, that is, after they return from recess. Unless they revolt over something like the fact that the bill is funded in part by rolling back food stamp benefits and <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/40623.html">gutting a renewable energy investment fund</a>.)</p><p>Republicans -- who "support" state aid, as long as it's paid for -- then tried to kill this paid-for state aid with the usual rules tricks, but that failed. And now everyone is moving on to making grandstanding speeches about Elena Kagan, which should be entertaining. (Like, here's Roland Burris! Enjoy every minute of this, Roland.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/08/04/senate_state_aid_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/08/04/senate_state_aid_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

