<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Scott Brown</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/scott_brown/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 01:38:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Brown makes it official with Wall Street</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/scott_brown_makes_it_official_with_wall_street/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/scott_brown_makes_it_official_with_wall_street/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lobbying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13225315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The former senator joins a law firm representing big banks as Elizabeth Warren rails against them]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown announced today that he's joining the government affairs department of a giant multinational law firm with major Wall Street clients.</p><p>"Brown will focus his practice on business and governmental affairs as they relate to the financial services industry as well as on commercial real estate matters," the firm, Nixon Peabody LLC, said in <a href="http://www.nixonpeabody.com/scott_brown_joins_nixon_peabody">a press release</a>. Brown will not be a lobbyist, the firm said, but whether he meets the specific legal requirements to be a registered lobbyist or not, it's clear that he will draw on his contacts and status to help advance clients' agenda in government. "He can offer many types of legal services to his broad network of contacts," the firm said.</p><p>The head of the Nixon Peabody's Government Relations practice is ex-New York congressman Tom Reynolds, who <a href="http://legaltimes.typepad.com/blt/2012/07/goldman-sachs-adds-nixon-peabody-to-its-stable-of-dc-lobbyists.html">now lobbies for Goldman Sachs</a> on "[f]inancial services regulatory and tax issues." According to the firm, Brown will also work with fellow Massachusettsian Jim Vallee, who <a href="http://www.milforddailynews.com/news/x681113347/State-Rep-Vallee-abruptly-resigns-his-seat">abruptly left his job</a> as majority leader of the state House of Representatives last year after getting hired by the firm.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/scott_brown_makes_it_official_with_wall_street/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/11/scott_brown_makes_it_official_with_wall_street/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who cares about seeing Ashley Judd naked?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/who_cares_about_seeing_ashley_judd_naked/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/who_cares_about_seeing_ashley_judd_naked/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ashley Judd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nudity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexting]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Daily Caller's latest attack rings hollow in the age of sexting, boob songs and Bush's leaked self-portraits]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have probably seen Ashley Judd naked. The Daily Caller would like to remind you of this in the context of her probable plans to run for Senate in Kentucky. The question is, does anyone care anymore about whom they've seen naked? And if they do, will they care in a decade or two?</p><p>Yes, the Daily Caller piece, to which I refuse to link, was sexist and gross. It was, as ThinkProgress's Alyssa Rosenberg <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/alyssa/2013/03/04/1665011/theatrical-slut-shaming-daily-caller-attacks-ashley-judd-for-movie-nude-scenes/">put it</a>, "part and parcel of the right’s current strategy to discredit promising female advocates," and "an attempt to make her seem less serious by impugning her sexual chastity." Was Scott Brown's strategically placed <a href="http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2013/03/potential-senate-candidate-ashley-judd-on-screen-nudity-naked-actors-politicians">arm</a> over the flesh he bared in Cosmo the difference between his getting elected to the Senate and not, or was it the double standard?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/who_cares_about_seeing_ashley_judd_naked/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/who_cares_about_seeing_ashley_judd_naked/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Brown&#8217;s cold feet</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/scott_browns_cold_feet/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/scott_browns_cold_feet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 12:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Weld]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13187788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All those fears about Democrats losing John Kerry's seat may be melting away before our eyes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The working assumption of every Democrat in Massachusetts and Washington has been that Scott Brown will enter the special Senate election to replace John Kerry, and there have been indications in the past week that he was preparing to do just that. But now <a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2013/01/31/congressman-lynch-launches-campaign-for-senate-seat/0jIlwDE5YtSJirYrmCec7N/story.html">there’s this</a>, from veteran Boston Globe reporter Frank Phillips:</p><blockquote><p>With time running short, Washington Republicans have begun a “full court press’’ to persuade an increasingly reluctant Scott Brown to run in the special election to replace John F. Kerry, say two leading Massachusetts GOP figures.</p> <p>The eleventh-hour effort, coordinated by the National Republican Senatorial Committee, comes as those familiar with Brown’s deliberations are becoming convinced that he will not run and instead will look for a job in the private sector.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/scott_browns_cold_feet/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/01/scott_browns_cold_feet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can Dems hold Kerry&#8217;s seat?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/the_primary_fight_democrats_want/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/the_primary_fight_democrats_want/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 12:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ed Markey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Lynch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13184749</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A heated Democratic primary might be the party's best shot at defeating the presumptive favorite, Scott Brown]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typically, the view of party leaders is that primaries are best avoided. Better to coalesce around a consensus candidate early, help that candidate amass a mighty bankroll, and focus the attention of volunteers, activists and other stakeholders on the general election. But that is not the prevailing attitude among Massachusetts Democrats as they face the state’s third Senate election in three years.</p><p>John Kerry’s confirmation as secretary of state <a href="http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2013-01-24/world/36517602_1_kerry-foreign-policy-syrian-president-bashar-al-assad">will come either Tuesday or Wednesday</a>, but it’s such a formality that the Massachusetts secretary of state has already gone ahead and scheduled the special election to replace him, with primaries in April and the final vote on June 25. Right now, there’s only one declared candidate from either party: Ed Markey, a Democratic congressman from outside Boston. But Democrats are convinced that Scott Brown, the Republican who won a January 2010 special election only to lose to Elizabeth Warren last fall, is going to jump in the race – and because of that, they are hoping that a second Democrat will also enter the fray to battle Markey in a primary.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/the_primary_fight_democrats_want/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/29/the_primary_fight_democrats_want/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barney Frank says he wants Senate appointment</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/barney_frank_says_he_wants_senate_appointment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/barney_frank_says_he_wants_senate_appointment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barney Frank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13161777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The outgoing congressman says he would be interested in taking John Kerry's seat until a potential special election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., says that he wants to be appointed to John Kerry's Senate seat until a special election is held, should Kerry get confirmed as secretary of state.</p><p>On "Morning Joe," Frank said: “A month ago, or a few weeks ago, in fact I said I wasn’t interested. It was kind of like you’re about to graduate, and they said: ‘You gotta go to summer school.’ But [the fiscal cliff deal] now means that February, March and April are going to be among the most important months in American financial history."</p><p>He added that he has "told the governor that I would now like, frankly, to do that," but that he is only interested in serving for the three-month period before a special election this summer. "I wouldn't want to run again," Frank said.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/barney_frank_says_he_wants_senate_appointment/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/04/barney_frank_says_he_wants_senate_appointment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ben Affleck: Door&#8217;s open for Senate run</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/ben_affleck_doors_open_for_senate_run/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/ben_affleck_doors_open_for_senate_run/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["One never knows," he says coyly on "Face the Nation." "I do have a great fondness ... for the political process"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben Affleck sounds a little like a senator. That is, he sounds like he's been paying attention to how to keep the door open on a run.</p><p>Affleck will appear Sunday on "Face the Nation," and the <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-34222_162-57560267-10391739/affleck-leaves-door-open-for-senate-run/">CBS Sunday morning show released an advance video</a> of the interview, in which the actor sounds like he's considering a run for John Kerry's seat in the Senate.</p><p>Kerry was nominated Friday to be secretary of state in President Obama's second term, succeeding Hillary Clinton. Scott Brown, who was defeated by Elizabeth Warren in November, is considered a likely GOP nominee, and an early favorite.</p><p>Here's the key quote:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/ben_affleck_doors_open_for_senate_run/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/ben_affleck_doors_open_for_senate_run/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Scott Brown would have a good shot at John Kerry&#8217;s seat</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/poll_scott_brown_would_have_a_good_shot_at_john_kerrys_seat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/poll_scott_brown_would_have_a_good_shot_at_john_kerrys_seat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State DEpartment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ben Affleck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If Kerry is tapped for secretary of state, Brown is favored to win his seat in a special election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new poll from WBUR finds that Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass., who will leave the Senate after losing his seat to Elizabeth Warren, is well poised to make a run for John Kerry's seat if Kerry is tapped by President Obama for secretary of state.</p><p>According to <a href="http://www.wbur.org/2012/12/20/wbur-special-senate-election-poll">WBUR</a>, Brown has a high favorability rating, despite his loss to Warren, with 58 percent of those polled saying they view him favorably, compared to 28 percent who view him unfavorably.</p><p>From WBUR:</p><blockquote><p>MassINC [Polling Group] pollster Steve Koczela looked at how well Brown would fare against four current or former Democratic members of Congress.</p> <p>“We matched him up theoretically against (U.S. Reps.) Ed Markey, Mike Capuano, Steve Lynch and (former U.S. Rep.) Marty Meehan, and in each one of those cases, he led by between 17 and 19 points,” Koczela said.</p></blockquote><p>Of course, who cares about Brown's favorability when Ben Affleck is <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/19/is_ben_affleck_going_to_run_for_senate/">maybe</a> going to run.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/poll_scott_brown_would_have_a_good_shot_at_john_kerrys_seat/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/poll_scott_brown_would_have_a_good_shot_at_john_kerrys_seat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>John Kerry and the ghost of Scott Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/john_kerry_and_the_ghost_of_scott_brown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/john_kerry_and_the_ghost_of_scott_brown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Deval Patrick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Kerry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13070896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's possible, but fears of a GOP comeback in Massachusetts shouldn't affect Obama's choice for secretary of state]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, Barack Obama is serious about rewarding John Kerry with a top Cabinet post in his second administration. The Massachusetts senator, who delivered a rousing convention speech in Charlotte and played Mitt Romney in the president’s debate prep sessions, is <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/13/us/politics/top-candidates-to-replace-clinton-at-state-dept-may-face-hurdles.html?hp">reportedly under consideration</a> to run either the Defense or State Departments.</p><p>Right now, most of the speculation is focused on the Pentagon, with Obama preferring to place his longtime friend Susan Rice at State. But Republican attacks on Rice over the Benghazi episode threaten to produce a bloody confirmation battle if Obama taps her. Democrats will have 55 votes (counting Angus King and Bernie Sanders) in the Senate come January, so in theory Obama would have the numbers to win that battle. But some of those Democrats – like, for instance, West Virginia’s Joe Manchin – could face home state pressure to defect if it became a clearly partisan fight.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/john_kerry_and_the_ghost_of_scott_brown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/13/john_kerry_and_the_ghost_of_scott_brown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Booyah! Jim Cramer predicts landslide victory for Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/booyah_jim_cramer_sees_landslide_victory_for_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/booyah_jim_cramer_sees_landslide_victory_for_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2012 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Claire McCaskill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Todd Akin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Cramer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CNBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13062353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The stockpicker thinks he sees alpha]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s not easy finding unconventional wisdom.</p><p>The Washington Post’s Outlook section sure tried. It asked 13 authorities for election predictions, even going so far as to reach beyond the usual Beltway pundits, strategists and gadflies. But with one exception, anyone looking for unique opinions will be disappointed.</p><p>Mostly respondents fell in line with mainstream numbers and predicted a narrow victory for President Obama. A 12th-grade government class, a meteorologist, a couple pundits and operatives, two tech guys and a poker player all have him beating Mitt Romney with 314 electoral votes or fewer. (A candidate needs 270 electoral votes to win.) Only GOP strategist Leslie Sanchez and the Post’s horse-racing writer Andrew Beyer predict Romney winning a close race.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/booyah_jim_cramer_sees_landslide_victory_for_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/04/booyah_jim_cramer_sees_landslide_victory_for_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP pays homeless to wear Scott Brown t-shirts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/gop_pays_to_rally_black_support_for_sen_scott_brown/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/gop_pays_to_rally_black_support_for_sen_scott_brown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boston]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13043471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Obama supporters for Brown" operates out of a Boston storefront]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Senator Scott Brown, R.-Mass., supporter is paying Obama supporters to support the incumbent in his hard fought race against Elizabeth Warren.</p><p>The Boston Herald <a href="http://bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view.bg?articleid=1061167984">reports</a> that Benjamin Thompson, who is African-American, is running “Obama supporters for Brown” that is paying about 20 "volunteers" a daily rate that works out to about $8 per hour. Their responsibilities include wearing pro-Brown T-shirts. At least four of the participants are homeless.</p><p>The storefront operation has support from the GOP’s MassVictory push but the Brown campaign had no comment.</p><p>The <a href="http://bostonherald.com/news/us_politics/view.bg?articleid=1061167984">Herald</a> reports:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/gop_pays_to_rally_black_support_for_sen_scott_brown/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/17/gop_pays_to_rally_black_support_for_sen_scott_brown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House and Senate races get nasty</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/house_and_senate_races_get_nasty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/house_and_senate_races_get_nasty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 13:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Tester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denny Rehberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13035702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Things are getting personal in the state-level campaigns]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In states like Massachusetts, Nevada and Montana, the races for House and Senate seats are getting more and more heated.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5iyaNomxHFd4mqoXNAZs0czzUybkw?docId=17a41912bc33453d817a88990c5ede9a">AP</a>:</p><blockquote><p>"In Massachusetts, GOP Sen. Scott Brown witheringly mocks Democrat Elizabeth Warren's claims of Native American heritage. In Montana, Democratic Sen. Jon Tester pummels Rep. Denny Rehberg for suing a local fire department. Nevada's Sen. Dean Heller calls his opponent, Democratic Rep. Shelly Berkley, the most corrupt' person he's ever met."</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/house_and_senate_races_get_nasty/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/house_and_senate_races_get_nasty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massachusetts Senate debate: Brown got more time than Warren</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/massachusetts_senate_debate_brown_got_more_time_than_warren/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/massachusetts_senate_debate_brown_got_more_time_than_warren/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 18:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13028105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Salon's tally finds that Brown spoke for an extra five minutes during last night's debate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you listen to the way Sen. Scott Brown tells it, he wasn’t given a fair shot in last night’s debate against Democratic challenger Elizabeth Warren. His most memorable line came toward the end when he said to the Harvard Law professor,"Excuse me, I'm not a student in your classroom, let me respond." And after the debate, he <a href="http://www.necn.com/10/02/12/Mass-Senate-debate-full-of-friction/landing_politics.html?blockID=782501&amp;feedID=4212">suggested to NECN</a> that Warren got more time to speak: “She went on for like five minutes and I wanted to at least be able to go point-for-point.”</p><p>But actually it was Warren who had significantly less time than Brown to make her case last night, as moderator David Gregory, of NBC’s "Meet the Press" often let Brown speak at length and occasionally cut Warren off. Salon’s tally of the debate found that Warren spoke for about 18 minutes and 15 seconds, while Brown had about 23 minutes and 40 seconds. We didn’t count time taken up by Gregory’s questions, unless they were part of a rapid-fire back and forth with a candidate. Gregory said at the beginning of the debate that there would be no time limits, but the extra five-plus minutes Brown was allowed to speak are significant, representing a little more than 10 percent of the total 42 minutes combined that the candidates had to speak.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/massachusetts_senate_debate_brown_got_more_time_than_warren/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/massachusetts_senate_debate_brown_got_more_time_than_warren/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brown and Warren take off the gloves</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/brown_and_warren_take_off_the_gloves/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/brown_and_warren_take_off_the_gloves/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 17:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The American Prospect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cherokee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13028090</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last night's debate revealed how heated this Massachusetts Senate contest has been -- and may yet become]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.prospect.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/07/Prospect-Logo.png" alt="The American Prospect" align="left" /></a> What a ruckus! NBC's David Gregory hosted the second debate between Massachusetts Senate candidates, sitting Republican Scott Brown and his Democratic challenger, Elizabeth Warren. If you want to call the interruption derby that devolved before the University of Massachusetts at Lowell students' eyes a debate. Gregory opened by asking Warren about the well-worn Cherokee heritage controversy. Warren repeated what she's said before—including in the last debate, which Brown opened by attacking her on the same issue. (Full disclosure: Warren's daughter, Amelia Warren Tyagi, is a member of The American Prospect’s board of directors and is chair of the board of the magazine’s publishing partner, Demos.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/brown_and_warren_take_off_the_gloves/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/brown_and_warren_take_off_the_gloves/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Scott Brown blew it</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/how_scott_brown_blew_it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/how_scott_brown_blew_it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 16:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13028044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Naming far-right Antonin Scalia his "model" Supreme Court justice may have cost him the election]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was Scott Brown thinking? When David Gregory asked him a predictable question about his "model" Supreme Court justice, he had plenty of options. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Justices_of_the_Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States">Literally 112, to be precise</a>. But he answered "Justice Scalia" – and by choosing the far-right lightning rod, he just may have lost the election in that moment.</p><p>Elizabeth Warren's campaign holds a slight lead, but her surest path to victory is reminding Massachusetts voters that they're Democrats. The state where Barack Obama leads Mitt Romney 60-32 percent in the latest WBUR poll shouldn't be sending a Republican senator to Washington to thwart the president. Scott Brown knows this, which is why he described himself as "independent" so many times Monday night. But given the chance to show real independence, he told Gregory that his model Supreme Court justice was the right-wing Antonin Scalia – and thus reminded voters of what may be the best reason to elect Warren.  The crowd's loud boos let Brown know he made a mistake, and he began scrambling to name other justices, but the damage was done.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/how_scott_brown_blew_it/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/how_scott_brown_blew_it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Brown has many favorite Supreme Court justices</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/scott_brown_has_many_favorite_supreme_ct_justices/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/scott_brown_has_many_favorite_supreme_ct_justices/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2012 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonia Sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonin Scalia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13027794</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A debate audience doesn't care much for his choice of favorite Supreme Court justice]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During the debate between Scott Brown and Elizabeth Warren, both candidates were asked about their favorite Supreme Court justices. Scott Brown named Justice Antonin Scalia and was promptly booed, but then went on to also name Justices Anthony Kennedy, John Roberts and Sonia Sotomayor. Warren picked Elena Kagan.</p><p>Watch:</p><p><iframe src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/sGvLkMa-RYY" frameborder="0" width="400" height="225"></iframe></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/scott_brown_has_many_favorite_supreme_ct_justices/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/02/scott_brown_has_many_favorite_supreme_ct_justices/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ryan: No math for you</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/ryan_no_math_for_you/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/ryan_no_math_for_you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allen West]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brief]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13026659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The VP nominee won't explain Romney's tax plan; Allen West down; Elizabeth Warren up; and other top Monday stories]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ryan's non-math:</strong> Republican vice-presidential nominee Paul Ryan <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/09/30/931121/paul-ryan-to-fox-news-i-dont-have-the-time-to-explain-how-we-will-pay-for-our-tax-plan/">refused</a> to explain the math behind Mitt Romney’s tax plan yesterday on Fox News Sunday, saying, “It would take me too long to go through all of the math.” Host Chris Wallace pressed numerous times for Ryan to explain how Romney and Ryan would pay for huge tax cuts, but Ryan wouldn’t budge. Nor was Ryan even willing to say how much the tax cuts would cost. The Romney campaign has so far <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/09/25/mitt-romney-hassett-tax-plan_n_1913566.html?utm_hp_ref=elections-2012">not provided details</a> of how the plan would be paid for.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/ryan_no_math_for_you/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/10/01/ryan_no_math_for_you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brown v. Warren: Automatons v. Leaders</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/brown_v_warren_automatons_v_leaders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/brown_v_warren_automatons_v_leaders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Corporate execs fear elected officials who have inconvenient morals or brains–like Elizabeth Warren]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask corporate executives what they really want in a legislator, and they probably won’t use words like “principled” or “well-informed.”</p><p>If the cocktails are appropriately strong and inhibitions are consequently reduced, executives will likely tell you in a moment of candor that the best politician, from their perspective, is the one who is incurious and who possesses very little policy expertise. They don’t want people with inconvenient morals, ethics or brains getting in their way. They want the equivalent of T-1000s from the “Terminator” films: unthinking, fully programmable cyborgs willing and able to shape-shift in order to carry out a mission.</p><p>Alas, it is rare to get such an admission in public, and it is even more rare to get said admission in the pages of a major publication. That’s why <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2012-09-13/scott-brown-wall-streets-hope-to-stop-elizabeth-warren"><em>Businessweek</em>’s recent examination</a> of the country’s marquee U.S. Senate race is so significant. In looking at the Massachusetts matchup between Republican incumbent <a href="http://www.scottbrown.com/s/watch-the-next-debate/">Scott Brown</a> and Democratic nominee <a href="http://elizabethwarren.com/splash-pages/join?utm_expid=49474463-0&amp;utm_referrer=http%3A%2F%2Felizabethwarren.com%2F">Elizabeth Warren</a>, the magazine quotes Brown fundraiser <a href="http://www.lawrencegmcdonald.com/">Lawrence McDonald</a>, a former Lehman trader, acknowledging that he and his Wall Street friends hate the idea of an independently informed legislator who might bring her own wisdom to Washington.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/brown_v_warren_automatons_v_leaders/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/brown_v_warren_automatons_v_leaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The choice between automatons and leaders</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/the_choice_between_automatons_and_leaders/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/the_choice_between_automatons_and_leaders/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harvard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Businessweek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13024655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a little-noticed remark, a Wall Streeter admits that execs fear elected officials who have inconvenient morals]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ask corporate executives what they really want in a legislator, and they probably won’t use words like “principled” or “well-informed.” If the cocktails are appropriately strong and inhibitions are consequently reduced, executives will likely tell you in a moment of candor that the best politician, from their perspective, is the one who is incurious and who possesses very little policy expertise. They don’t want people with inconvenient morals, ethics or brains getting in their way. They want the equivalent of T-1000s from the "Terminator" films: unthinking, fully programmable cyborgs willing and able to shape-shift in order to carry out a mission.</p><p>Alas, it is rare to get such an admission in public, and it is even more rare to get said admission in the pages of a major publication. That’s why Businessweek’s recent examination of the country’s marquee U.S. Senate race is so significant. In looking at the Massachusetts matchup between Republican incumbent Scott Brown and Democratic nominee Elizabeth Warren, the magazine quotes Brown fundraiser Lawrence McDonald, a former Lehman trader, acknowledging that he and his Wall Street friends hate the idea of an independently informed legislator who might bring her own wisdom to Washington.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/the_choice_between_automatons_and_leaders/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/28/the_choice_between_automatons_and_leaders/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scott Brown channels Jesse Helms</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/scott_brown_channels_jesse_helms/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/scott_brown_channels_jesse_helms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 21:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13021869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scott Brown channels his inner Jesse Helms and attacks Elizabeth Warren for "using" her Native American heritage]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those frat-boy conservatives are at it again. Today Sen. Scott Brown's staff had a good time <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/sen_scott_browns_staffers_caught_making_tomahawk_chops/">doing the tomahawk chop and war-whooping</a> during an Elizabeth Warren rally in Boston, to mock her claims to Native American ancestry. Asked about it by reporters, Brown wouldn't apologize for his boyos:</p><p>"The apologies that need to be made and the offensiveness here is the fact that professor Warren took advantage of a claim, to be somebody -- a Native American -- and using that for an advantage, a tactical advantage."</p><p>Clearly Brown is sticking to his Jesse Helms strategy, updated for the 21st century.</p><p>North Carolina Sen. Jesse Helms was infamous for his racism, but even he had to tone it down and code it for the modern era. In 1990, running against North Carolina Gov. Harvey Gantt, an African-American, Helms ran <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KIyewCdXMzk">the infamous "white hands" ad</a>, written by Romney advisor Alex Castellanos. It opened with a white man's hands crumpling a job-rejection letter, and the voice-over went like this:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/scott_brown_channels_jesse_helms/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/scott_brown_channels_jesse_helms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sen. Scott Brown&#8217;s staffers caught making &#8220;tomahawk chops&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/sen_scott_browns_staffers_caught_making_tomahawk_chops/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/sen_scott_browns_staffers_caught_making_tomahawk_chops/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elizabeth Warren]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Americans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Na]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13021311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also, "war whoops" [UPDATED]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several Scott Brown staffers were caught on video imitating Native American stereotypes, presumably to mock Elizabeth Warren's claim that she is part Cherokee.</p><p>According to <a href="http://www.wcvb.com/news/politics/Sen-Scott-Brown-staffers-caught-on-video-chanting-Indian-war-whoops-making-tomahawk-chops/-/9848766/16727976/-/tj3yi5z/-/index.html">WCVB-TV in Boston</a>, several staffers were making "war whoops" and "tomahawk chops" at a rally for Brown in Boston:</p><blockquote><p>"Brown's deputy Chief of Staff Greg Casey and Constituent Service Counsel Jack Richard, and GOP operative Brad Garrett are pictured in the video, NewsCenter 5's Janet Wu confirmed."</p></blockquote><p>Watch:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/sen_scott_browns_staffers_caught_making_tomahawk_chops/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/09/25/sen_scott_browns_staffers_caught_making_tomahawk_chops/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
