<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Sean Hannity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sean_hannity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Mitt Romney passing the Hannity Test?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/is_mitt_romney_passing_the_hannity_test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/is_mitt_romney_passing_the_hannity_test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mitt Romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10104691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No Fox News host is as devoted to the GOP as Sean Hannity. Here's what his show tells us about the Republican race]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you've probably noticed, this has been a good week for Mitt Romney, who seems to be <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65292.html">winning</a> <a href="http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/10/04/leading-christie-supporter-turns-to-romney/">over</a> the elite Republican donors who'd been trying to recruit Chris Christie into the race and who has <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1295.xml?ReleaseID=1656">regained the lead</a> in national polls thanks to Rick Perry's self-initiated free fall. But how good?</p><p>To answer that, I decided to check in on Sean Hannity's Fox News show <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/hannity/index.html#/v/1202764646001/are-republicans-happy-with-field-of-2012-candidates/?playlist_id=86924">last night</a>. As I've <a href="http://politics.salon.com/2011/09/28/gop_irrational/">written before</a>, I'm using what I call the "Hannity Test" to gauge Romney's progress in the GOP race. The basic idea is that Romney, because of the party base's deep suspicion of him, needs Republican opinion leaders to vouch for him, and to play along with the rationalizations he's desperately trying to sell to GOP voters.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/is_mitt_romney_passing_the_hannity_test/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/06/is_mitt_romney_passing_the_hannity_test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sean Hannity demands to know if Obama is stupid</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/hannity_obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/hannity_obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/30/hannity_obama</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Fox News host is convinced that our president, not Rick Perry, is actually the dumb-dumb]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much of the political commentariat spent yesterday pondering whether or not Rick Perry was a <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/08/29/rick_perry_dumb">little bit dim</a> -- but not Sean Hannity. The Fox News host, infuriated with what he perceived to be yet another example of liberal media bias, set his sights much higher last evening. What if the president is actually the <a href="http://video.foxnews.com/v/1134760094001/democrats-gop-target-2012-frontrunner/?playlist_id=86924">dumb one</a>, huh?</p><p>"If Obama's such a genius, he would've not lost two-and-a-half million jobs. He would've cut the deficit in half, like he promised!" And he never would have mispronounced "<a href="http://nation.foxnews.com/politics/2010/02/04/obama-mispronounces-navy-corpsman-prayer-breakfast">corpsman</a>,"&#160;Hannity exclaims, over and over and over again.&#160;</p><p>
  <script src="http://video.foxnews.com/v/embed.js?id=1134760094001&amp;w=440&amp;h=263" type="text/javascript"></script></p><p>
  <noscript></p><p>Watch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a></p><p>  </noscript></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/hannity_obama/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/hannity_obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>44</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palin: GOP should &#8220;reload&#8221; over debt crisis</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/palin_reload_debt_ceiling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/palin_reload_debt_ceiling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 12:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/07/14/palin_reload_debt_ceiling</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Hannity, the former Alaska governor brings back her old catchphrase and slams the McConnell proposal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again, Sarah Palin is recommending that Republicans "reload." Appearing on Hannity Wednesday night, the (possible) presidential hopeful said "We cannot default, but we cannot afford to retreat right now either."</p><p>Palin also spoke out against the "last choice" plan suggested by Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) earlier this week. "That plan of McConnell&#8217;s makes no sense because it cedes power to Obama," she said of the proposal that has split Democrats and Republicans. (Our own <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/budget_showdown/index.html?story=/tech/htww/2011/07/13/the_house_gop_and_mcconnell">Andrew Leonard explains</a> why "McConnell's debt ceiling plan gives Washington a way out of its mess. But the Tea Party will never go for it" -- as Palin's Hannity appearance confirms.)</p><p>Palin also told Hannity that she'll announce her decision about a White House bid in late August or early September.</p><p>Watch Palin's appearance below, via Mediaite:</p><p>
    <iframe allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="421" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?layout=&amp;playlist_cid=&amp;media_type=video&amp;content=BG6X0T002GYRX5ZD&amp;read_more=1&amp;widget_type_cid=svp" width="420"></iframe>
  </p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/palin_reload_debt_ceiling/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/14/palin_reload_debt_ceiling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox News: &#8220;Sesame Street&#8221; pushing liberal gay agenda?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/sesame_street_gay_hannity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/sesame_street_gay_hannity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/movies/feature/2011/06/02/sesame_street_gay_hannity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sean Hannity hosts a bonkers segment on how Elmo and Big Bird are turning your children into homosexual Democrats]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#160;Today's episode of "The Sean Hannity Show" has been brought to you by the letter "L" and the number "4." The L stands for "liberal," boys and girls, which is what our nation's beloved children's program is trying to turn tykes into with its secret pro-gay, Democratic agenda. Four is how many people Fox News could scrounge up to support this Falwell-cy.</p><p>
    <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/3Ypsojc5vFg" width="425"></iframe>
  </p><p>Leaving aside the rehashed argument that <s>"Teletubbies"</s> "Sesame Street" is a liberal attack on family values, can we talk about how Ben Shapiro's first sentence on the show was, "Yeah, I kind of want to take them out back and cap 'em." What? Hopefully, he is talking about Big Bird and Elmo and not the children that Hannity said were going to hate the conservative author/pundit after his book comes out. Family values!</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/sesame_street_gay_hannity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/02/sesame_street_gay_hannity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hannity calls guest &#8220;evil S.O.B.&#8221; during Egypt discussion</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/hannity_imam_evil_sob/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/hannity_imam_evil_sob/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egyptian Protests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/02/03/hannity_imam_evil_sob</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["You're one sick, miserable, evil S.O.B., but thank you for coming on anyway"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fox News host Sean Hannity invited a radical imam named Anjem Choudary onto his show last night to discuss Egypt.&#160;</p><p>This has all the makings of a beautiful friendship, you might find yourself thinking. But sadly, that was not the case. At the end of the protracted conversation, Hannity called Choudary "one sick, miserable, evil S.O.B." -- though he still had the good manners to thank him for coming on.</p><p>Yes, the clip is 15 minutes long. No, it isn&#8217;t pretty.</p><p>
    <iframe allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" height="421" marginheight="0" marginwidth="0" scrolling="no" src="http://videos.mediaite.com/embed/player/?layout=&amp;playlist_cid=&amp;media_type=video&amp;content=2MBVW82BCQL0H4B0&amp;read_more=1&amp;widget_type_cid=svp" width="420"></iframe>
  </p><p>&#160;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/hannity_imam_evil_sob/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/02/03/hannity_imam_evil_sob/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>192</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sarah Palin&#8217;s first post-Tucson interview</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/18/palin_hannity_tucson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/18/palin_hannity_tucson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 03:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/01/17/palin_hannity_tucson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I will continue to speak out. They're not going to shut me up."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nine days after Jared Loughner's shooting spree in Tucson (and five days after her <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2011/01/12/palin_statement_arizona">widely criticized</a> videotaped response) Sarah Palin gave her first interview on the subject Monday night ... to Sean Hannity of the Fox News Channel, the network that employs her as a paid contributor. Over three segments, she lashed out at the media for focusing on her in the wake of the shooting, defended her use of the term "blood libel" in her videotape, and repeatedly asserted that she wouldn't "shut up" going forward. Watch the entire interview below:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/01/18/palin_hannity_tucson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/01/18/palin_hannity_tucson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fox Democrat Doug Schoen to be special guest at GOP fundraiser</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/07/doug_schoen_republican/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/07/doug_schoen_republican/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Oct 2010 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/10/07/doug_schoen_republican</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pollster is scheduled to be a special guest at a party for one of Hannity's favorite Republican candidates]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Famed "Democratic" pollster Doug Schoen can commonly be found on Fox News explaining that Democrats are bad and wrong. Sometimes he writes op-eds with fellow "Democrat" Pat Caddell about <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/07/28/caddell_schoen_obama_race_baiting">how awful and disappointing Barack Obama is</a> because of his constant race-baiting and class warfare. (And sometimes he writes, for Fox, that the Democratic party needs a "bold, centrist agenda that focuses on fiscal discipline ." Also Barack Obama's next chief of staff <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/10/01/doug-schoen-rahm-emanuel-white-house-chicago-mayor-obama-pete-rouse-erskine/">should have "tires fo the business community."</a>)</p><p>Obviously, as a longtime, prominent Democrat, Doug Schoen is doing everything he can to help out in the upcoming midterm elections. For example: He's a special guest at a fundraiser for a congressional candidate from New York this Sunday. <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201010070028">The candidate is Republican John Gomez</a>. As Media Matters <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201010070028">reports</a>, Gomez may not be a Democrat, but he's a part of Schoen's <em>real</em> family: Fox News.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/10/07/doug_schoen_republican/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/10/07/doug_schoen_republican/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell on Hannity: Who doesn&#8217;t regret the &#8217;80s?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/22/christine_odonnell_hannity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/22/christine_odonnell_hannity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/22/christine_odonnell_hannity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Delaware's unlikely Senate nominee gets the softball Fox treatment, says she's done with national TV]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christine O'Donnell sat down with Fox's Sean Hannity last night to explain <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/09/22/2010-09-22_christine_odonnell_tea_party_delaware_senate_hopeful_will_not_do_any_more_nation.html">why she's done doing national TV</a>, except for this Sean Hannity appearance. Hannity peppered her with tough questions, while leading her comfortably to prepared responses drafted by her new media team.</p><p>Like, after outlining her history of being generally fanatical about "moral" issues, Hannity asked her to blame her own positions on Democratic attacks: "Do you think this is an attack on religion? On your religious beliefs?"</p><p>"They're trying to paint me as an extremist," O'Donnell answered, "so that people won't pay attention to my message." Her real message is about the Constitution.</p><p>And why did she say all those nutty things, on TV? She was young!</p><p>"In my 20s I had a newfound faith and, going on these shows, I looked at it as a ministry opportunity -- that was what I did in my 20s. But that was a long time ago. My faith has matured."</p><p>"My faith has matured" is probably the right line for someone who previously preached the sort of fundamentalist Catholicism that most American Catholics would probably find a bit extreme (while being unmarried and childless at 40!).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/22/christine_odonnell_hannity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/22/christine_odonnell_hannity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>88</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Christine O&#8217;Donnell to appear on Hannity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/21/odonnell_fox_hannity/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/21/odonnell_fox_hannity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 20:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christine O'Donnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/09/21/odonnell_fox_hannity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Delaware Republican suddenly has time to do national TV]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, in a post about Christine O'Donnell's decision to cancel on "Face the Nation" and "Fox News Sunday," <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/politics/war_room/2010/09/20/odonnell_cancels_sunday_shows">I wrote this:</a></p><p>"And while I'm sure Chris Wallace is disappointed, I imagine O'Donnell will continue to make Fox appearances. They'll just be with Hannity, instead."</p><p>I didn't think I'd be proven right within 24 hours, but <a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-pn-odonnell-hannity-20100922,0,6831928.story">here you go:</a></p><blockquote>
<p>Days after canceling appearances on two Sunday talk shows, Christine O'Donnell will sit down with Fox News Channel personality Sean Hannity, the network announced Tuesday.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/09/21/odonnell_fox_hannity/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/09/21/odonnell_fox_hannity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>37</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fred Barnes not on a team? Why did GOP pay him?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 19:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Morris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ronald Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Delay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Weekly Standard editor claimed political purity in bashing Journolist, but he's on the Republican payroll]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the pages of the Wall Street Journal, Fred Barnes <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB100014240527487046846045753883191313448.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h">has lately lamented</a> the betrayal of "traditional journalism" by the liberal denizens of Journolist -- the defunct listserv that conservatives have used to revive the debate over "liberal media bias." His widely quoted Journal Op-Ed noted that before Journolist, neither liberal nor conservative journalists were likely to be "part of a team," and went on to add:</p><blockquote>
<p>"If there's a team, no one has asked me to join. As a conservative, I normally write more favorably about Republicans than Democrats and I routinely treat conservative ideas as superior to liberal ones. But I've never been part of a discussion with conservative writers about how we could most help the Republican or the conservative team."</p>
</blockquote><p>This assertion of political purity struck me as false, coming from a journalist who has <a href="http://mediamatters.org/research/201004210012">appeared repeatedly</a> as a speaker at Republican Party events across the country -- a breach of the political boundaries of "traditional journalism" that few, if any, of the writers on Journolist, for example, would ever contemplate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/07/29/fred_barnes_paid_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barbara, Carly, Meg and Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/12/fiorina_boxer_whitman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/12/fiorina_boxer_whitman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jun 2010 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010 Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carly Fiorina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meg Whitman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joan_walsh//politics/2010/06/11/fiorina_boxer_whitman</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tuesday's election results keep having fascinating aftershocks. Plus: The Alvin Greene story is just sad]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Carly Fiorina is history. Her catty, clueless, on-camera hot mic conversation about Barbara Boxer's hair and other topics created a perfect indelible picture of her persona, which should have been sealed in public opinion by the way she de-souled Hewlett Packard as CEO, and then set private investigators on dissident members of her board before she went down (with her $21 million golden/leaden parachute).</p><p>But I have to say, it's disappointing the focus has been on Fiorina's diss of Boxer's hair. The real political story was insulting her female GOP "colleague" Meg Whitman for going on right-winger Sean Hannity's show the day after Whitman's primary win in the governor's race. It highlighted the Whitman/Fiorina feud -- we can't have TWO female Republican Silicon Valley CEOs running for top state offices in California; they must scratch one another's eyes out! And if it's up to Fiorina, she might.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/12/fiorina_boxer_whitman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/12/fiorina_boxer_whitman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday link dump: On teasing panthers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/11/friday_link_dump_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/11/friday_link_dump_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bank Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global Warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gulf Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2010/06/11/friday_link_dump</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glenn Beck's book, Chuck Schumer's honesty, and Rand Paul resurfaces on Fox]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://rortybomb.wordpress.com/2010/06/11/getting-the-best-of-both-bills-a-conference-committee-report/">Here is a chart</a> of what to fight for in the Financial Regulation conference committee.</li>
<li>NYPD wins terrible court ruling with the old <a href="http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/06/11/nypd-can-keep-its-secrets-2004-convention-arrests-remain-mysterious/"><em>we can do anything we want because of terror!</em></a> defense.</li>
<li>A very good McClatchy piece <a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/06/11/95755/how-obama-blew-his-critical-offshore.html">on where Obama went wrong in approving the expansion of offshore drilling.</a></li>
<li>"New York politician has insane stance on Israel" is not news, but <a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/06/senator-chuck-schumer-wants-to-strangle-gaza-residents-economically-as-collective-punishment/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+matthewyglesias+%28Matthew+Yglesias%29">here's Chuck Schumer being a little more honest than he meant to me</a> while speaking to the Orthodox Union. Turns out the Gaza siege is mostly about collective punishment of a million people!</li>
<li>Yes, someone at Media Matters actually <a href="http://mediamatters.org/blog/201006110032">had to read the Glenn Beck book.</a></li>
<li>Here is <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/06/11/pentagon-budget-cuts-coul_n_609132.html">$1 trillion we could cut from the Pentagon budget.</a> Let's make it happen!</li>
<li>Joshua Green is <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/personal/archive/2010/06/an-apology-to-rand-paul/57999/">sorry he made Rush hate Rand Paul.</a></li>
<li>What does a creationist biology "lab" <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2010/06/what_does_the_biologic_institu.php?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+scienceblogs%2Fpharyngula+%28Pharyngula%29">do all day?</a></li>
<li>Are you scared of Turkey yet? <a href="http://mondoweiss.net/2010/06/corporate-medias-message-turkey-is-the-new-enemy.html">Haven't you heard that they're Muslims?</a> Just like al-Qaeda!</li>
<li>Yep, regional Tea Parties <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/06/11/tea-freedomworks-demonstration-trash/">are protesting mandatory trash pickup.</a></li>
<li>Rand Paul <a href="http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/06/what_if_rand_paul_gave_an_inte.html">had a lovely interview with Sean Hannity.</a></li>
<li>Mitch McConnell <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/06/one-man-government-the-clock-ticks-on/58014/">is still shutting down the government, for fun.</a></li>
<li>Lamar(!) Alexander will solve global warming <a href="http://www.tnr.com/blog/jonathan-chait/75470/lamar-and-the-magic-climate-plan">with magic.</a></li>
</ul><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/06/11/friday_link_dump_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/06/11/friday_link_dump_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nonpartisan watchdog downgrades Hannity charity</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/02/watchdog_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/02/watchdog_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2010 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/04/02/watchdog</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sean Hannity's Freedom Alliance used to boast of its four-star rating by Charity Navigator -- but not anymore]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patriotic donors cannot say they weren't warned: The four-star rating of Freedom Alliance by Charity Navigator, an independent and nonpartisan Web site that rates charitable organizations, has <a href="http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&amp;orgid=6590">dropped</a> precipitously from four stars to two stars. The abrupt downgrade occurred within two days after Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington filed complaints against the Freedom Alliance with the Federal Trade Commission and the Internal Revenue Service, alleging consumer fraud and abuse of tax-exempt status.</p><p>The complaints also named Fox News personalities Sean Hannity and Oliver North Jr., who run Freedom Alliance and the Freedom Concerts that have raised millions of dollars over the past decade.</p><p>Freedom Alliance has often boasted of its high ratings from charitable watchdog groups, specifically citing the four stars awarded by Charity Navigator to bolster its credentials as a benefactor of military veterans and their families. That generous assessment was particularly valuable because another major rating agency, the American Institute of Philanthropy, has long treated Freedom Alliance with <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason/2010/03/31/freedom/index.html">deep skepticism</a>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/04/02/watchdog_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/04/02/watchdog_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hannity&#8217;s charity vows to rebut fraud charges &#8212; someday</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/freedom_3/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/freedom_3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/03/31/freedom</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Freedom Alliance promises to disprove "smears" filed at the FTC and IRS in the "days and weeks" to come]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will fans of Sean Hannity and Oliver North feel reassured by the pair's denial of any wrongdoing in the operation of the Freedom Alliance, their multimillion-dollar charity? The Fox News personalities no doubt hope so, as they prepare for the annual series of fundraising "Freedom Concerts" tour that will kick off in New Jersey in August, headlined by Lynyrd Skynyrd and the Charlie Daniels Band.</p><p>Responding to the complaints against the Freedom Alliance filed last Monday with the Federal Trade Commission and the Internal Revenue Service by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington -- alleging both consumer fraud and abuse of tax-exempt status -- the group's chairman, Tom Kilgannon, <a href="http://www.freedomalliance.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=2632&amp;Itemid=1">replied</a> that there is "absolutely no merit to the scurrilous charges." His brief statement went on to promise that "the smear-mongers who have launched this politically motivated witch hunt against Freedom Alliance will be proven wrong as we aggressively defend ourselves in the days and weeks ahead."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/freedom_3/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/31/freedom_3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do Hannity and North operate a &#8220;charitable&#8221; fraud?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/hannity_4/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/hannity_4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/joe_conason//2010/03/29/hannity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sean Hannity and Ollie North say they collect millions of dollars for veterans' kids. But where did the money go?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A potentially damaging scandal erupted today that implicates Fox News Channel personalities Sean Hannity and Oliver North in the worst kind of charitable fraud. According to <a href="http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/44511">complaints</a> filed with the Federal Trade Commission and the IRS, the two right-wing icons have exploited American veterans for personal and partisan gain. The actions filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington accuse Hannity and North of misusing millions of dollars collected by the Freedom Alliance, a charity they promote and control.</p><p><a href="http://www.debbieschlussel.com/6938/sean-hannitys-freedom-concert-scam-only-7-of-charitys-money-went-to-injured-troops-kids-of-fallen-troops-g5s-g6s-for-vannity/">Similar accusations</a> were aired recently by right-wing blogger Debbie Schlussel, who complained that the "Freedom Concerts" sponsored by the Freedom Alliance and headlined by Hannity were not donating all proceeds -- estimated at more than $10 million -- to scholarships for the children of wounded and killed service members, as advertised. But now CREW, which had been investigating the same allegations independently before Schlussel posted her warning, has completed its own probe and filed legal actions before the two federal agencies.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/hannity_4/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/03/29/hannity_4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>82</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tune in, turn on, buy a credit swap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/24/generation_zero/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/24/generation_zero/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2010/02/24/generation_zero</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The documentary "Generation Zero" blames the hippies for blowing up Wall Street]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"Generation Zero" is a documentary about the roots of the financial crisis that reportedly debuted to rave reviews at the Tea Party Convention and <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/cpac/index.html">at CPAC.</a> As such, it falls within HTWW's purview. But I've been doing my best to ignore it. Call me close-minded, but I am self-aware enough to know that I just can't be fair to a film whose argument, according to <a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/76005/tea-party-convention-marks-coming-out-for-a-movement">one account,</a> is "that the financial crisis was deliberately engineered by radical 1960s ideologues."</p><p>The notion is so ahistorical, so obviously a propaganda feint in the culture wars, that it's just impossible to take seriously. It's 911-Truther-style poppycock for conservatives not quite crazy enough to be Birthers. Though I'm sure there's a lot of crossover.</p><p>But, you know, I live in Berkeley -- heck, I was practically <em>born</em> in Berkeley, and when a colleague told me that "Generation Zero" blamed "the hippies" for causing the crisis, I felt a certain responsibility to push back, or at least become more informed. So I watched a 10-minute clip from Fox's Sean Hannity introducing the documentary.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2010/02/24/generation_zero/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2010/02/24/generation_zero/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hannity&#8217;s economy: Always blame the Dems</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/22/hannity_and_the_economy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/22/hannity_and_the_economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bill Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Great Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[How the World Works]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/technology/how_the_world_works//2009/06/22/hannity_and_the_economy</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama owns the recession now, says the Fox host. Just like Bush owned his downturn in 2001? No, wait -- ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pointing out the manifest hypocrisy embedded in nearly every word that emerges from Sean Hannity's mouth is as pointless as attempting to count all the grains of sand in the Sahara, or the stars in the sky. But when it's executed with particular precision, <a href="http://www.brendan-nyhan.com/blog/2009/06/sean-hannity-unbiased-observer.html">as per a Brendan Nyhan post</a> this morning detailing who the Fox loudmouth likes to blame for recessions, we must give praise.</p><p>First, Nyhan&#160; cites <a href="http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200906190002">a Media Matters clip</a> documenting Hannity's attempts to blame President Obama for our current economic ills. "This is Obama's economy, now," he declaims.</p><p>Let's take a trip on the wayback machine, to the summer of 2001, when George W. Bush was struggling with his own down economy.</p><blockquote>
<p>Sean Hannity, August 17, 2001: "[T]his is still the Clinton economy, in case you forgot."</p>
<p>Sean Hannity, August 20, 2001: "[W]e have the Clinton economy, the Clinton slowdown ... We are living under the Clinton economy, and the slowdown that started in the spring of 2000."</p>
</blockquote><p>Et cetera.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2009/06/22/hannity_and_the_economy/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2009/06/22/hannity_and_the_economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact-checking the Schiavo &#8220;experts&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/25/experts_2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/25/experts_2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2005 22:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fox News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2005/03/25/experts</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week Fox News pundits showcased an "expert" doctor who supports keeping Terri alive. Never mind that they falsely awarded him a Nobel Prize nomination.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Numerous "experts" have weighed in on the Terri Schiavo case since it began -- some more <a href="http://www.salon.com/politics/war_room/index.html?blog=/politics/war_room/2005/03/21/michael/index.html" target="_blank">dubious</a> than others. On Monday, Fox News' Hannity and Colmes <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,151148,00.html" target="_blank">presented</a> Dr. William Hammesfahr, a Florida neurologist who examined Terri in 2002, and who insists that Terri is not in a permanent vegetative state. Alongside Hammesfahr's rather astonishing prognosis, Hannity made sure to take note of Hammesfahr's lofty qualifications: </p><p><b>Hannity</b>: Do you believe she is aware, conscious and responsive? </p><p><b>Hammesfahr</b>: Terri is completely aware and conscious and responsive. She is like a child with cerebral palsy. We have kids in the Pinellas County school system every day that are much worse than her, that we're educating. </p><p><b>Hannity</b>: Doctor, wait a minute. I've got to get this straight here. You were nominated to get a Nobel Peace Prize in this very work. Are you saying that this woman could be rehabilitated? </p><p><b>Hammesfahr</b>: Absolutely. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2005/03/25/experts_2/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2005/03/25/experts_2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The blowhard next door</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2002/08/26/hannity_5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2002/08/26/hannity_5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sean Hannity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//feature/2002/08/26/hannity</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The boyish Sean Hannity seems poised to inherit Rush Limbaugh's mantle. And he isn't letting little things like facts get in his way to the top.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don't already know who Sean Hannity is, you will. If you are already familiar with the ubiquitous conservative pundit, prepare to see a lot more of him. The 40-year-old co-host of Fox News' <a target="new" href="http://www.foxnews.com/hannityandcolmes/">"Hannity and Colmes"</a> (as the conservative foil to liberal Alan Colmes) is a young, telegenic face in a graying-man's game. His show is already the third-highest cable news show, trailing only Fox's "O'Reilly Factor" and CNN's "Larry King Live." His radio show, which went into syndication late last year and airs in the crucial 3-to-6&nbsp;p.m. "drive time" slot, draws 10&nbsp;million listeners<!--, the tk-largest audience in the country-->. And he seems poised to follow the gilded paths of Fox colleague Bill O'Reilly and, quite possibly, Rush Limbaugh, who has been the standard-bearing conservative spokesman for nearly two decades. </p><p>Eventually, Hannity will "be bigger than Limbaugh," Michael Harrison, the publisher of the radio industry's Talkers magazine, predicted to People magazine earlier this year. It's not difficult to see why. While no less partisan, Hannity's scrappy, boy-next-door delivery would seem to have a broader appeal than that of the more dour Limbaugh. </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2002/08/26/hannity_5/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2002/08/26/hannity_5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

