<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Senate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/senate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 02:24:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Rubio: Immigration bill is in almost &#8220;perfect shape&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/rubio_immigration_bill_is_in_almost_perfect_shape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/rubio_immigration_bill_is_in_almost_perfect_shape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marco Rubio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Undocumented immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I think the debate now is about what that border security provision looks like,” he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., a key member of the "Gang of Eight" senators drafting an immigration reform bill, <a href="http://thehill.com/video/senate/305825-sen-rubio-says-most-of-immigration-reform-bill-in-perfect-shape">said Sunday</a> that the legislation is in almost "perfect shape," though he added that the border security provisions still need to be worked out.</p><p>“I think it's an excellent starting point, and I think 95, 96 percent of the bill is in perfect shape and ready to go.  But there are elements that need to be improved.  This is how the legislative process is supposed to work,” he said, speaking on ABC's "This Week."</p><p>Rubio continued that "the bottom line is a bill that does not have increased border security, which everyone now I think has conceded needs to happen -- I think the debate now is about what that border security provision looks like."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/rubio_immigration_bill_is_in_almost_perfect_shape/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/rubio_immigration_bill_is_in_almost_perfect_shape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most senators reportedly skipped NSA briefing to catch flights home</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/most_senators_reportedly_skipped_nsa_briefing_to_catch_flights_home/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/most_senators_reportedly_skipped_nsa_briefing_to_catch_flights_home/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 14:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Clapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13328144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only 47 senators attended a briefing with James Clapper on the agency's phone surveillance program]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fifty-three senators reportedly skipped a briefing with James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, and other top intelligence officials, on the NSA's phone surveillance program, so they could catch flights home for the weekend, according to <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/305765-senators-skip-classified-briefing-on-nsa-snooping-to-catch-flights-home">The Hill</a>.</p><p>The Hill reports:</p><blockquote><p>The Senate held its last vote of the week a little after noon on Thursday, and many lawmakers were eager to take advantage of the short day and head back to their home states for Father’s Day weekend.</p> <p>Only 47 of 100 senators attended the 2:30 briefing, leaving dozens of chairs in the secure meeting room empty as Clapper, Alexander and other senior officials told lawmakers about classified programs to monitor millions of telephone calls and broad swaths of Internet activity. The room on the lower level of the Capitol Visitor Center is large enough to fit the entire Senate membership, according to a Senate aide.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/most_senators_reportedly_skipped_nsa_briefing_to_catch_flights_home/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/16/most_senators_reportedly_skipped_nsa_briefing_to_catch_flights_home/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About half the Senate skipped classified NSA briefing</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/half_of_the_senate_skipped_this_weeks_classified_nsa_briefing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/half_of_the_senate_skipped_this_weeks_classified_nsa_briefing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Father's Day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13327920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Father's Day was more important]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America may currently the middle the most intense national debate about data privacy since 9/11, but you wouldn't be able to tell that by looking at the U.S. Senate. <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/305765-senators-skip-classified-briefing-on-nsa-snooping-to-catch-flights-home">The Hill reports</a> that more than half of the senators decided to skip out on a classified briefing on Thursday afternoon with James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence, Keith Alexander, the head of the National Security Agency (NSA), and other officials. </p><p>From the Hill:</p><blockquote><p>The Senate held its last vote of the week a little after noon on Thursday, and many lawmakers were eager to take advantage of the short day and head back to their home states for Father’s Day weekend. </p> <p>Only 47 of 100 senators attended the 2:30 briefing, leaving dozens of chairs in the secure meeting room empty as Clapper, Alexander and other senior officials told lawmakers about classified programs to monitor millions of telephone calls and broad swaths of Internet activity. The room on the lower level of the Capitol Visitor Center is large enough to fit the entire Senate membership, according to a Senate aide. </p></blockquote><p>The Hill doesn't know who attended the briefing and who didn't, but it would be interesting to know what <a href="http://gawker.com/your-congress-is-raising-a-generation-of-despicable-mon-513239010">proud father Jeff Flake</a> decided to do.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/half_of_the_senate_skipped_this_weeks_classified_nsa_briefing/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/15/half_of_the_senate_skipped_this_weeks_classified_nsa_briefing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Harry Reid becomes 50th co-sponsor of ENDA</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/harry_reid_becomes_50th_co_sponsor_of_enda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/harry_reid_becomes_50th_co_sponsor_of_enda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13326416</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“No one should face discrimination in their workplace based on sexual orientation,” Reid said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Employment Non-Discrimination Act, which would protect gays and lesbians from workplace discrimination, just got its 50th co-sponsor, now that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid signed on to the legislation.</p><p>“No one should face discrimination in their workplace based on sexual orientation,” Reid, D-Nev., said in a statement, the <a href="http://www.washingtonblade.com/2013/06/14/reid-agrees-to-co-sponsor-enda/">Washington Blade</a> reports. “It’s time to make fairness the law of the land. That is why I am co-sponsoring this legislation and I will do everything I can to ensure that it passes the Senate.”</p><p>From the Blade:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/harry_reid_becomes_50th_co_sponsor_of_enda/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/14/harry_reid_becomes_50th_co_sponsor_of_enda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate to expand women&#8217;s bathroom to accommodate historic numbers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/senate_to_expand_womens_bathroom_to_accomodate_historic_numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/senate_to_expand_womens_bathroom_to_accomodate_historic_numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 16:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bathrooms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Gap]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women in Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13324264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Workers are currently renovating the two-stall bathroom to make room for a record number of female lawmakers ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Female senators, having shattered the glass ceiling, will be rewarded with porcelain thrones after the summer recess.</p><p>Construction crews are currently renovating the women's bathroom off the Senate floor -- a paltry two stalls -- to accommodate the 20 female senators in the 113th Congress, a record high.</p><p>“We’re even going to have a window,” Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/this_is_what_the_gender_gap_in_congress_really_looks_like/" target="_blank">told</a> the Washington Post.</p><p>The symbolism of the crowded ladies room was not lost on Shaheen and her colleagues: “It’s a really positive sign of how things have changed here,” she said.</p><p>While 20 female senators is an all-time high, it's still actually pretty low since women account for, you know, half of the population; as Salon has previously <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/this_is_what_the_gender_gap_in_congress_really_looks_like/" target="_blank">noted</a>, women make up 20 percent of the Senate and 17 percent of the House.</p><p>Clearly, we have a long way to go -- hopefully there are more bathroom renovations in Congress' future.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/senate_to_expand_womens_bathroom_to_accomodate_historic_numbers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/12/senate_to_expand_womens_bathroom_to_accomodate_historic_numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dick Durbin: FISA declassification bill will be &#8220;ill-fated&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/dick_durbin_fisa_declassification_bill_will_be_ill_fated/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/dick_durbin_fisa_declassification_bill_will_be_ill_fated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dick Durbin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Merkley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Wyden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mike Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13323159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["I encourage this," he said, but added that he doesn't see it getting the necessary support from the White House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., said that although he supports a new piece of legislation to declassify FISA court opinions, it will be "ill-fated" without way more support from Congress and the White House.</p><p>"I encourage this, though I think it is going to be ill-fated," Durbin, the Senate majority whip, told <a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/304751-durbin-fisa-declassification-bill-dead-on-arrival-">the Hill</a>. He continued that even if the bill, which has bipartisan support, makes it through Congress, he doesn't see Obama signing it. "I think they are going to eventually turn us down," he said, adding: "They are [just] going to say no."</p><p>"I have been offering these amendments for years ... and losing them, regularly," Durbin said.</p><p>The bill would require Attorney General Eric Holder to declassify opinions issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which authorizes domestic intelligence operations, like those NSA phone surveillance programs revealed last week by the Guardian and the Washington Post, under FISA and the Patriot Act.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/dick_durbin_fisa_declassification_bill_will_be_ill_fated/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/dick_durbin_fisa_declassification_bill_will_be_ill_fated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate passes farm bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/senate_passes_farm_bill_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/senate_passes_farm_bill_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Farm Bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Stamp Program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legislation, which makes small cuts to food stamps over a five-year period, now heads to the House]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The last time Congress passed a farm bill, Democrats had control of the House and the food stamp program was about half the size it is today.</p><p>That was five years ago.</p><p>Conservatives calling for an overhaul of the domestic food aid program will try to trim the nation's nearly $80 billion grocery bill when the House weighs in on farm legislation in a few weeks. The Senate overwhelmingly voted Monday to expand farm subsidies and make small cuts to food stamps in a five-year, half-trillion dollar measure. But passage in the House isn't expected to be so easy — or so bipartisan.</p><p>House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Monday that his chamber will take up its version of the farm bill later this month. He made clear his own dislike for generous farm subsidies included in the bill, saying his "concerns about our country's farm programs are well-known." But Boehner acknowledged that the rest of the chamber might not agree with him.</p><p>"If you have ideas on how to make the bill better, bring them forward," Boehner said in a statement directed to his colleagues. "Let's have the debate, and let's vote on them."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/senate_passes_farm_bill_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/11/senate_passes_farm_bill_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NRA mailer thanks Dem for voting against background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/nra_mailer_thanks_dem_for_voting_against_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/nra_mailer_thanks_dem_for_voting_against_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heidi Heitkamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[North Dakota]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13322163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mailer tells North Dakotans to support Heidi Heitkamp because she opposed the Senate's measure]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democratic Sen. Heidi Heitkamp's vote against the Senate's gun background check measure is getting her support from the National Rifle Association, which put out a mailer urging its supporters in North Dakota to thank Heitkamp for her vote.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.grandforksherald.com/event/article/id/265594/group/homepage/">Grand Forks Herald</a>:</p><blockquote><p>Andrew Arulanandam, NRA spokesman, said the group wanted to make sure its members in the state express their gratitude because Heitkamp stood up to “tremendous political pressure.”</p> <p>“The NRA thinks that Sen. Heitkamp is a profile in courage and common sense. She listens to her constituents,” he said.</p></blockquote><p>Heitkamp was one of four Democrats to vote against the Manchin-Toomey Amendment. She has an A-rating from the NRA.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/nra_mailer_thanks_dem_for_voting_against_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/10/nra_mailer_thanks_dem_for_voting_against_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The rise of Cory Booker</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/the_rise_of_cory_booker/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/the_rise_of_cory_booker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cory Booker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[up with steve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13321010</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Up with Steve Kornacki" panelists debate the mayor's chances of winning the seat for U.S. Senate]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Newark N.J. mayor Cory Booker announced his candidacy for U.S. Senate on Saturday morning, running in a special election for a seat that opened up after the death of U.S. Sen. Frank Lautenberg.</p><p>On MSNBC's "Up with Steve Kornacki," panelists discuss Booker's chances in the democratic primary and the general election in October. </p><p>Kornacki describes Booker as the "overwhelming favorite" of the candidates and potential candidates in the democratic primary, which include Rep. Rush Holt, U.S. Rep. Frank Pallone and speaker of the state assembly Sheila Oliver. </p><p>Ingrid Reed of the Eagleton Institute of Politics, said, "He is well known, so around the state if you had to name one person, showed them the list, they would point to Cory Booker." </p><p>"But if you look a little deeper, Newark is not Cory Booker's place," she said. "He's not -- doesn't seem to be in control in administrative matters, budget, police, so on, but he's had political problems in Newark. How do New Jerseyans look at that?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/the_rise_of_cory_booker/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/the_rise_of_cory_booker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cory Booker enters race for U.S. Senate</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/cory_booker_enters_race_for_u_s_senate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/cory_booker_enters_race_for_u_s_senate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cory Booker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Jersey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank Lautenberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13320966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Newark mayor announced his candidacy on Saturday morning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After several days <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/07/campaign_staffer_booker_to_enter_new_jersey_senate_race_ap/">of speculation</a>, Newark, N.J. mayor Cory Booker has officially announced his candidacy for U.S. Senate. Booker is running in a special primary election that will fill the seat of late Sen. Frank Lautenberg, who died on Monday. </p><p>The 44-year-old mayor was introduced by former U.S. Bill Bradley, D-N.J. at the press conference, who said that Booker is "the right person for the right office at the right time."</p><p>"I believe the right kind of politics allows us to see something bigger than ourselves. It allows politicians to appeal to our better nature. And it allows citizens to have faith in their neighbors, in people, in humankind. The reason I am here today is because I believe Cory Booker embodies that kind of politics and is that kind of leader," said Bradley.</p><p>The party primary will take place on Aug. 13 and the special general election will be held Oct. 16.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/cory_booker_enters_race_for_u_s_senate/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/08/cory_booker_enters_race_for_u_s_senate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conservatives support background checks, too!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/conservatives_support_background_checks_too/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/conservatives_support_background_checks_too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Policy Polling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democrats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dukes of Hazzard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Scherer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13313327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Washington's latest fact-free myth about the American people: Half the country opposes all forms of gun control]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As social media accelerates the velocity of political news, fact-free stereotypes and reductionist shorthand are increasingly substituted for accuracy and nuance. Coastal blue states are now typically presented in the national press as one giant Berkeley campus while heartland red states are portrayed as a confederacy of “Dukes of Hazzard” sets. In this cartoonish mythology, liberals are all Birkenstock-clad socialists, conservatives are all Boss Hoggs -- and politics is a perpetual conflict between these two warring tribes.</p><p>The trouble, of course, is that the folklore has a diminishing connection to reality. Case in point is the narrative that now defines the Washington debate over gun control.</p><p>This week, in a piece summarizing that narrative, Time magazine's White House correspondent Michael Scherer asserted that television ads pressuring lawmakers to support background check legislation will harm Democratic politicians who represent Republican-leaning states (ed. note: Scherer <a href="https://twitter.com/michaelscherer/status/340547753539149824">disputes</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/michaelscherer/status/340548650780483584">this</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/michaelscherer/status/340555937179914240">interpretation</a> of his argument). About the ads, Scherer asked: "Is it better to teach wavering Democrats that there is a cost to voting against gun control, even if it jeopardizes Democratic control of the Senate, which is needed to enact gun control?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/conservatives_support_background_checks_too/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/31/conservatives_support_background_checks_too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate panel approves immigration overhaul</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/_senate_panel_approves_immigration_overhaul_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/_senate_panel_approves_immigration_overhaul_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charles Grassley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13305383</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legislation will grant citizenship to millions of immigrants living illegally in the United States]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Far-reaching legislation that grants a chance at citizenship to millions of immigrants living illegally in the United States cleared the Senate Judiciary Committee on a solid bipartisan vote Tuesday night after supporters somberly sidestepped a controversy over the rights of gay spouses.</p><p>The 13-5 vote cleared the way for an epic showdown on the Senate floor on legislation that is one of President Barack Obama's top domestic priorities — yet also gives the Republican Party a chance to recast itself as more appealing to minorities.</p><p>The action sparked rejoicing from immigration activists who crowded into a Senate committee room to witness the proceedings. "Yes, we can! Si, se puede" they shouted, reprising the campaign cry from Obama's first run for the White House in 2008.</p><p>In addition to creating a pathway to citizenship for 11.5 million immigrants, the legislation creates a new program for low-skilled foreign labor and would permit highly skilled workers into the country at far higher levels than is currently the case.</p><p>At the same time, it requires the government to take costly new steps to guard against future illegal immigration.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/_senate_panel_approves_immigration_overhaul_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/22/_senate_panel_approves_immigration_overhaul_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple uses foreign companies to avoid billions in taxes</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/apple_uses_foreign_companies_to_avoid_billions_in_taxes_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/apple_uses_foreign_companies_to_avoid_billions_in_taxes_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Tax Code]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303882</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to a Senate investigation, the world's most valuable company has stashed $102 billion in cash overseas]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON - Apple Inc. employs a group of affiliate companies located outside the United States to avoid paying billions of dollars in U.S. income taxes, a Senate investigation has found.</p><p>The world's most valuable company is holding overseas some $102 billion of its $145 billion in cash, and an Irish subsidiary that earned $22 billion in 2011 paid only $10 million in taxes, according to the report issued Monday by the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations.</p><p>The strategies Apple uses are legal, and many other multinational corporations use similar tax techniques to avoid paying U.S. income taxes on profits they reap overseas. But Apple uses a unique twist, the report found. The company's tactics raise questions about loopholes in the U.S. tax code, lawmakers say.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/apple_uses_foreign_companies_to_avoid_billions_in_taxes_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/apple_uses_foreign_companies_to_avoid_billions_in_taxes_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can a liberal wonk save the Senate?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/can_this_wonk_save_the_senate_from_itself_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/can_this_wonk_save_the_senate_from_itself_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oregon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Wyden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meals-on-Wheels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13303589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron Wyden believes sequestration is a blessing in disguise, giving Congress a chance to reevaluate its priorities  ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" /></a> Having served in Congress for more than three decades -- and in the upper chamber since 1996 -- Oregon Democrat Ron Wyden has established a reputation as one of the Senate's more serious and diligent members. Over the years on Capitol Hill, he has watched the Republican Party veer constantly further rightward, and yet he continues to believe against all evidence that bipartisan legislative cooperation is possible -- even likely. His habitual reaching across the partisan chasm has generated much controversy, notably when he floated a Medicare reform plan with House Budget chair Paul Ryan.</p><p>Meanwhile, Wyden has also accumulated considerable seniority, despite his youthful demeanor (and a new baby at home). With the announced retirement of Democratic Senator of Montana Max Baucus, Wyden is set to replace him as chair of the powerful Senate Finance Committee in the next Congress (assuming that Democrats retain control of the Senate). Recently he spoke with The National Memo about the budget, tax reform, health care and other matters of concern to the Finance committee.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/can_this_wonk_save_the_senate_from_itself_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/20/can_this_wonk_save_the_senate_from_itself_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obstruction will ruin GOP</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/obstruction_will_ruin_gop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/obstruction_will_ruin_gop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 11:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jack Lew]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secretary of labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13302085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Playing politics and abusing the system can excite the extremes, but it's a recipe for long-term political disaster]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s obvious that the unprecedented Senate Republican obstruction of executive branch nominations is bad for the president; it’s bad for the smooth functioning of the government; and it’s bad for voters who elected a Democratic president and a solid, 55-seat Democratic majority in the Senate. I’ve argued, too, that it’s bad for the Senate.</p><p>Less obvious? It’s bad for Republicans.</p><p>Now, in electoral terms, it can’t be bad for both parties, since electoral politics is a zero-sum game. Indeed, that’s sort of the problem for Republicans; obstruction of these nominations almost certainly has zero electoral effect. After all, most voters couldn’t tell you who the nominees for secretary of labor or to head the Environmental Protection Agency are, let alone the obscure rules Republicans are using to delay their confirmation.</p><p>So the effects of massive, across-the-board obstruction are going to be on policy, not elections. And that’s not a zero-sum game – and it will hurt Republicans and Republican-aligned groups, too.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/obstruction_will_ruin_gop/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/obstruction_will_ruin_gop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>169</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid: Republicans hypocritical for Benghazi, IRS outrage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/reid_republicans_hypocritical_for_benghazi_irs_outrage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/reid_republicans_hypocritical_for_benghazi_irs_outrage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Benghazi]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13298521</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Where was their outrage when groups on the other side of the political spectrum were under attack?" he said]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid chastised Republicans for their outrage over the scandal surrounding the IRS's targeting of conservative groups, arguing that in the past when the agency targeted groups of a different ideological persuasion, Republicans said nothing.</p><p>"This is not the first time we've seen this," Reid told reporters, according to the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/14/harry-reid-irs_n_3274166.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003">Huffington Post</a>. "It wasn't long ago that the IRS inappropriately targeted the NAACP, Greenpeace and a California church that was progressive, called the All-Saints Church in Pasadena. It was interesting at that time, we didn't hear a single Republican grandstand the issue then. Where was their outrage when groups on the other side of the political spectrum were under attack?"</p><p>Reid emphasized that he believes the IRS's behavior was "inappropriate," adding: "I believed it then, I believe it now."</p><p>He continued that accusations about a Benghazi coverup by the Obama administration are "about smear politics and nothing else." Reid added: "Earlier this year, they didn't say a word when Republicans held up for months and months security funding of our embassies."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/reid_republicans_hypocritical_for_benghazi_irs_outrage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/14/reid_republicans_hypocritical_for_benghazi_irs_outrage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden in immigration reform, vast biometrics plan</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/hidden_in_immigration_reform_vast_biometrics_plan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/hidden_in_immigration_reform_vast_biometrics_plan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 14:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biometrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration Reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal immigrants]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13294732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The bill under debate in the Senate contains a proposal mandating a massive database of every adult American]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The very concept of population is one of a certain type of control -- namely the mechanisms through which certain groups get to be counted as among, or outside the population. Indeed, to be part of a population -- further, a citizenry -- is to be countable, databased. It should come as no surprise then, that tucked into the proposed immigration reform bill currently under debate in the Senate is a mandate for ensuring every American is identified, counted and countable constantly. As <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/05/immigration-reform-dossiers/">Wired noted</a> Friday, "Buried in the more than <a href="http://www.judiciary.senate.gov/legislation/EAS13500toMDM13313redline.pdf">800 pages of the bipartisan legislation</a> (.pdf)  is language mandating the creation of the innocuously-named “photo tool,” a massive federal database administered by the Department of Homeland Security and containing names, ages, Social Security numbers and photographs of everyone in the country with a driver’s license or other state-issued photo ID."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/hidden_in_immigration_reform_vast_biometrics_plan/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/10/hidden_in_immigration_reform_vast_biometrics_plan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coburn wants to tack pro-gun amendments onto Senate water bill</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/coburn_wants_to_tack_pro_gun_amendments_onto_senate_water_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/coburn_wants_to_tack_pro_gun_amendments_onto_senate_water_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Coburn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oklahoma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gun Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Second Amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13292723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate is scheduled to vote on the amendments on Wednesday [UPDATED]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATE - May 8, 1:30 p.m.: </strong>Coburn has withdrawn the amendment that would have required the federal government to register all of its firearms. A spokesman for Coburn told <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/08/tom-coburn-gun-amendment_n_3238465.html">The Huffington Post</a> that the decision was made "as a goodwill gesture" to Boxer, following her criticism of the amendment on Tuesday.</p><p><strong>From earlier:</strong></p><p>The Senate is scheduled to vote on the Water Resources Development Act on Wednesday, which authoritzes water projects by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. But Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., also wants to add two pro-gun amendments to the equation.</p><p>One of the <a href="https://mail-attachment.googleusercontent.com/attachment/u/1/?ui=2&amp;ik=953c763263&amp;view=att&amp;th=13e84c7f87e5a7c5&amp;attid=0.2&amp;disp=inline&amp;safe=1&amp;zw&amp;saduie=AG9B_P9pLOyWHsZg20C2S-cxLa0t&amp;sadet=1368027667076&amp;sads=Q8z-fZieFUUl3lp6Ks3fL2XXZ3I">amendments</a> would allow people to carry guns at water resources development projects regulated by the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers, including outdoor recreational areas where guns are currently forbidden. The other <a href="https://mail-attachment.googleusercontent.com/attachment/u/1/?ui=2&amp;ik=953c763263&amp;view=att&amp;th=13e84c7f87e5a7c5&amp;attid=0.1&amp;disp=inline&amp;safe=1&amp;zw&amp;saduie=AG9B_P9pLOyWHsZg20C2S-cxLa0t&amp;sadet=1368027665162&amp;sads=C5_vPC54IXLKqlS0EQFob2WTZzo&amp;sadssc=1">amendment</a> would require federal agencies to register guns and ammunition it owns, purchases or loses within a given year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/coburn_wants_to_tack_pro_gun_amendments_onto_senate_water_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/08/coburn_wants_to_tack_pro_gun_amendments_onto_senate_water_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate bill to end tax-free Internet shopping</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/senate_bill_to_end_tax_free_internet_shopping_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/senate_bill_to_end_tax_free_internet_shopping_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 11:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Walmart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best Buy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Target]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13290598</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legislation, which is expected to pass, would allow states to collect sales taxes on web purchases]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — Attention online shoppers: The days of tax-free shopping on the Internet may soon end for many of you.</p><p>The Senate is scheduled to vote Monday on a bill that would empower states to collect sales taxes for purchases made over the Internet. The measure is expected to pass because it has already survived three procedural votes. But it faces opposition in the House, where some Republicans regard it as a tax increase. A broad coalition of retailers is lobbying in favor of it.</p><p>Under current law, states can only require retailers to collect sales taxes if the store has a physical presence in the state.</p><p>That means big retailers with stores all over the country like Walmart, Best Buy and Target collect sales taxes when they sell goods over the Internet. But online retailers like eBay and Amazon don't have to collect sales taxes, except in states where they have offices or distribution centers.</p><p>As a result, many online sales are tax-free, giving Internet retailers an advantage over brick-and-mortar stores.</p><p>The bill would empower states to require businesses to collect taxes for products they sell on the Internet, in catalogs and through radio and TV ads. Under the legislation, the sales taxes would be sent to the states where a shopper lives.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/senate_bill_to_end_tax_free_internet_shopping_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/06/senate_bill_to_end_tax_free_internet_shopping_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More poll backlash for senators who opposed background checks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/more_poll_backlash_for_senators_who_opposed_background_checks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/more_poll_backlash_for_senators_who_opposed_background_checks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[background checks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeff Flake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lisa Murkowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Begich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new PPP survey shows that the approval ratings for senators who opposed the measure dropped since the vote]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new survey from the Democratic-leaning <a href="http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2013/04/more-backlash-against-senators-on-gun-vote.html">Public Policy Polling</a> continues to reflect the trend of senators seeing their approval ratings affected by how they voted for gun background checks.</p><p>From PPP:</p><blockquote><p> 52% of voters say they're less likely to support [Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.] in a future election because of this vote, compared to only 19% who say they're more likely to. Additionally voters say by a 21 point margin, 45/24, that they trust senior colleague John McCain more than Flake when it comes to gun issues</p> <p>....</p> <p>39% of voters say they're less likely to vote for each of [Sen. Mark Begich, D-Alaska] and [Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska] in their next elections based on this vote, while only 22% and 26% say they're more likely to vote for Begich and Murkowski respectively because of this.</p></blockquote><p>Ohio Sen. Rob Portman and Nevada Sen. Dean Heller, both Republicans, saw similar results. A poll from PPP <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/24/ayottes_approval_tanks_after_opposing_background_checks/">released</a> last week also had Sen. Kelly Ayotte seeing a drop in her approval rating since her vote against background checks.</p><p>Sen. Pat Toomey, on the other hand, has gotten a <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/pat_toomey_gets_a_background_check_poll_bump/">boost</a> in the polls since he spearheaded the measure.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/more_poll_backlash_for_senators_who_opposed_background_checks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/more_poll_backlash_for_senators_who_opposed_background_checks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
