<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Senate Intelligence Committee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/senate_intelligence_committee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 12:02:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Intelligence Committee pushes Brennan forward</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_intelligence_committee_pushes_brennan_forward/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_intelligence_committee_pushes_brennan_forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219984</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The select panel approves the CIA director nomination, which will now go to a full Senate vote]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Brennan is one step closer to becoming director of the CIA.</p><p>The Senate Intelligence Committee voted Tuesday to approve President Barack Obama's pick to lead the spy agency, setting the nomination up for consideration by the full Senate.</p><p>The vote came after the White House agreed to provide the committee with access to the secret legal opinions written by the Justice Department that justify the use of lethal drone strikes against terror suspects, including American citizens.</p><p>Senate Republicans also are using Brennan's nomination to push for classified records about the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya.</p><p>Brennan is currently serving as the top counterterrorism adviser in the White House.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_intelligence_committee_pushes_brennan_forward/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_intelligence_committee_pushes_brennan_forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate Intelligence Committee to get kill list opinions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_intelligence_committee_to_get_kill_list_opinions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_intelligence_committee_to_get_kill_list_opinions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kill Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drone memos]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The DoJ papers will be available to the select Senate committee only to pave way for Brennan's confirmation]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House has agreed to meet demands of the Senate Intelligence Committee and provide access to all Justice Department legal opinions justifying the use of targeted killing. The Obama administration<a href="www.salon.com/2013/02/21/wh_refuses_to_release_more_kill_list_opinions/"> had resisted releasing seven of a total 11 opinions</a> to senators after four were made available (with restrictions) last month around CIA director nominee John Brennan's confirmation hearing.</p><p>The intelligence committee is expected to confirm Brennan's directorship with a vote Tuesday afternoon. Sens. Ron Wyden of Oregon and Mark Udall of Colorado, as well as Kentucky's Rand Paul, had threatened to block his confirmation over White House resistance to releasing the drone memos.</p><p>Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., chairwoman of the intelligence committee, announced in a statement, "I am pleased the administration has made this information available. It is important for the committee to do its work and will pave the way for the confirmation of John Brennan to be CIA director."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_intelligence_committee_to_get_kill_list_opinions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_intelligence_committee_to_get_kill_list_opinions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate committee set to vote on Obama&#8217;s CIA choice</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_committee_set_to_vote_on_obamas_cia_choice/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_committee_set_to_vote_on_obamas_cia_choice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_committee_set_to_vote_on_obamas_cia_choice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate Intelligence Committee will vote Tuesday on John Brennan's nomination]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — John Brennan's nomination to be director of the CIA is set for a key test before the Senate Intelligence Committee.</p><p>The committee is scheduled to vote Tuesday on Brennan, who is currently serving as President Barack Obama's top counterterrorism adviser in the White House.</p><p>Brennan's nomination to lead the spy agency has been held up by demands from Democrats and Republicans for more details about the classified Justice Department legal opinions that justify the use of unmanned spy planes to terrorist suspects overseas, including American citizens, and about the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya.</p><p>Obama nominated Brennan to be CIA director in early January. If the intelligence committee, which is controlled by the Democrats, approves the nomination, it would then move to the full Senate for consideration.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_committee_set_to_vote_on_obamas_cia_choice/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/senate_committee_set_to_vote_on_obamas_cia_choice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DoJ opinions: Known unknown unknowns</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/doj_opinions_known_unknown_unknowns/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/doj_opinions_known_unknown_unknowns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kill Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13211879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not only is the White House keeping kill list opinions secret, it's a secret how many OLC opinions even exist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following the limited and controlled release of four Justice Department Office of Legal Counsel opinions on targeted killings to members of the Senate Intelligence Committee, the Obama administration <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/wh_refuses_to_release_more_kill_list_opinions/">has flouted demands</a> by some senators to see more classified documents on the legal justification for extrajudicial killing.</p><p>According to the <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/25/obama-classified-olc-opinions_n_2759878.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003">Huffington Post's Ryan J. Reilly</a>, the secrecy surrounding legal opinions is at a meta level. Not only can we not know the content of these legal opinions, we can't even know how many such opinions have been issued. Via HuffPo:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/doj_opinions_known_unknown_unknowns/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/25/doj_opinions_known_unknown_unknowns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WH refuses to release more kill list opinions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/wh_refuses_to_release_more_kill_list_opinions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/wh_refuses_to_release_more_kill_list_opinions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kill Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targeted killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jon brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13207293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Obama administration will bend to GOP demands over Benghazi to see Brennan confirmed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The White House is resisting demands of some senators to provide more legal opinions justifying the use of targeted killing. During the Senate Intelligence Committee's confirmation hearing for CIA director nominee John Brennan, a number of Democratic senators asked that they and their staff be given access to more legal memos -- this request is, <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/02/21/us/politics/strategy-seeks-to-ensure-bid-of-brennan-for-cia.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=0">according to the New York Times</a> Thursday, being flouted.</p><p>According to the Times, the administration is maneuvering information releases so as to appease just enough senators to see counterterror czar John Brennan confirmed as CIA director:</p><blockquote><p>Rather than agreeing to some Democratic senators’ demands for full access to the classified legal memos on the targeted killing program, Obama administration officials are negotiating with Republicans to provide more information on the lethal attack last year on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, according to three Congressional staff members.</p> <p>The strategy is intended to produce a bipartisan majority vote for Mr. Brennan in the Senate Intelligence Committee without giving its members seven additional legal opinions on targeted killing sought by senators.</p></blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/wh_refuses_to_release_more_kill_list_opinions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/21/wh_refuses_to_release_more_kill_list_opinions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senators delay Brennan vote over drones</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/senators_delay_brennan_vote_over_drones/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/senators_delay_brennan_vote_over_drones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13201107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand Paul threatened to put a "hold" on the nomination, demanding answers on targeted killing]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate vote to approve John Brennan as CIA director was scheduled for Thursday but has been delayed at least a week. In a statement Wednesday, Senate Intelligence Committee chairwoman Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) said that the committee was pressing the White House to disclose seven more legal opinions, plus "any other relevant documents" relating to the administration's targeted killing program. Two such opinions were released to committee members last week ahead of Brennan's confirmation hearing.</p><p>The precise details behind the vote delay are not clear, but according to Reuters, Democratic senators were willing to vote Thursday, while a number of Republicans were not. "Political issues and procedural rules made a Thursday vote problematic, said congressional sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity," Reuters noted. Via <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/13/cia-prisoners-missing-black-sites_n_2681215.html">Reuters:</a></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/senators_delay_brennan_vote_over_drones/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/senators_delay_brennan_vote_over_drones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former CIA lawyer: Brennan didn&#8217;t object to torture</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/former_cia_lawyer_brennan_didnt_object_to_torture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/former_cia_lawyer_brennan_didnt_object_to_torture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2013 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Waterboarding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john rizzo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eit's]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13198605</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At his confirmation hearing, Brennan says he has long condemned waterboarding. An old colleague remembers otherwise]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During his Senate confirmation hearing to become CIA director, John Brennan insisted that while working in the CIA during the Bush administration, he had complained to colleague's about the agency's enhanced interrogation techniques (EIT's) used against detainees.</p><p>“I professed my personal objections to and views to some agency colleagues about certain of those EIT's, such as waterboarding, nudity and others where I professed my personal objections to it," Brennan told the Senate Intelligence Committee. “But I did not try to stop it because it was something that was being done in a different part of the agency.”</p><p>However, according to comments made by a longtime colleague of Brennan's, former CIA lawyer John Rizzo, the counterterror czar's "personal objections" were not known to even those working closely with him at the time. As HuffPo noted Tuesday, during a panel discussion on the film "Zero Dark Thirty" at Cardozo Law School, Rizzo supported the selection of Brennan as CIA director, but challenged his claims of objecting to waterboarding:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/former_cia_lawyer_brennan_didnt_object_to_torture/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/12/former_cia_lawyer_brennan_didnt_object_to_torture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How do you explain drone killings? With post-Orwellian &#8220;Newspeak&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/09/how_do_you_explain_drone_killings_with_post_orwellian_newspeak/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/09/how_do_you_explain_drone_killings_with_post_orwellian_newspeak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anwar al-Awlaki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Wyden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-Ore.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Angus King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Collins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13196215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the logic of perma-war, "imminent threat" is everywhere and drone attacks on Americans are no problem]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/john_brennan/">John Brennan’s</a> confirmation hearing on Thursday before the Senate Intelligence Committee struck many observers as a small but significant step in the direction of openness, a chink in the armor of secrecy that the last two presidential administrations have erected around the “war on terror.” Maybe that will turn out to be correct, and the incoming CIA director – the principal architect of President Obama’s drone war, and until recently a defender of rendition and “enhanced interrogation” – will launch a new era of transparency in Langley. While we wait for that, would you like to see this bridge I’ve got for sale in Brooklyn?</p><p>Indeed, watching the Brennan hearing, and then struggling through the troubling <a href="http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/i/msnbc/sections/news/020413_DOJ_White_Paper.pdf">Justice Department “white paper”</a> spelling out the legal justification for the drone killings of American citizens (which was recently acquired and released by NBC News), left me with quite a different feeling. In large part, this was the feeling that our government’s imperial creep continues uninterrupted, that most people <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/liberals_love_drones_too/">simply don’t care</a> (irrespective of their supposed political views) and that almost everyone involved in this charade, especially those of us in the media who are supposed to serve as the watchdogs, has agreed to ignore the most obvious and glaring questions.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/09/how_do_you_explain_drone_killings_with_post_orwellian_newspeak/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/09/how_do_you_explain_drone_killings_with_post_orwellian_newspeak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact-checking Feinstein on civilian drone deaths</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/fact_checking_feinstein_on_civilian_drones_deaths/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/fact_checking_feinstein_on_civilian_drones_deaths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civilian deaths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yemen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13195016</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At John Brennan's confirmation hearing, the senator understated civilian casualties from drones]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opening the Senate <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/brennan_faces_the_senate_intelligence_committee/">confirmation hearing</a> for CIA director nominee John Brennan, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) offered a mini panegyric to drone strikes. She lamented the secrecy surrounding the CIA's drone program as she wanted to be able to speak more openly about its successes and the minimal collateral damage of drone wars. She stated that civilian casualties caused by U.S. drone strikes each year has "typically been in the single digits."</p><p>Later in the hearing, Brennan rejected claims that drone strikes were provoking a backlash of anti-American sentiment. He said citizens are instead grateful to be rescued from the grip of al-Qaida. But commentators have been swift to challenge Feinstein's claims based on contradicting open-source reports and studies. As both the Washington Post and the Guardian <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/feb/07/drones-obama-single-digit-civilian-deaths">note</a>, civilian death numbers are difficult to tabulate with certainty (indeed, the very question of how the administration categorizes "civilian" or "enemy combatant" is in itself contentious). Suffice to say that Feinstein's "single digits" comments stands at odds with others' findings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/fact_checking_feinstein_on_civilian_drones_deaths/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/08/fact_checking_feinstein_on_civilian_drones_deaths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brennan faces the Senate Intelligence Committee</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/brennan_faces_the_senate_intelligence_committee/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/brennan_faces_the_senate_intelligence_committee/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drone strikes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Extraordinary Rendition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13193868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED: After early Code Pink protest, the hearing goes smoothly for Brennan, who skirts a number of questions]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Updated, 5:55 p.m. EST: </strong>And Feinstein closes the questioning by telling Brennan how great she thinks he is, echoing Rockefeller's earlier panegyric. There will be another hearing on Tuesday, but, in the great CIA tradition Brennan is set to uphold, it's classified.</p><p><strong>Updated, 5:25 p.m. EST: </strong>Wyden pushes Brennan on whether an American citizen should be given the opportunity to surrender himself before a targeted killing attempt is made. But Brennan says an American who joins al-Qaida is an enemy in war and has thus forfeited this right.</p><p>But Wyden points out that the issue here is with evidence and possible geographical limitations when it comes to adding U.S. citizens to kill lists.</p><p>(In an ostensibly lighthearted moment, Sen. Burr comments that in the lengthy hearing, the nominee has drunk four glasses of water and says "I'll be brief... I don't want to be accused of waterboarding you." Because waterboarding jokes, especially when the very serious issue of torture and CIA interrogation techniques are on the table, are the mark of good taste.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/brennan_faces_the_senate_intelligence_committee/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/brennan_faces_the_senate_intelligence_committee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brennan hearing prompts release of kill list rationale</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/brennan_hearing_prompts_release_of_kill_list_rationale/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/brennan_hearing_prompts_release_of_kill_list_rationale/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 14:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Brennan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enhanced interrogation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kill Lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13193304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obama directed DoJ to hand over the classified legal opinion to Senate Intelligence Committee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although John Brennan's confirmation as CIA Director is nigh on assured, his nomination procedure has been anything but routine. Leading up to his Senate confirmation hearing Thursday, a demand for answers about the darkest aspects of the U.S. counterterror program -- of which Brennan is a major architect -- has swelled in the media, among activists and in Congress.</p><p>On the eve of the hearing, President Obama fulfilled Congressional demands to have the Justice Department release the classified legal reasoning for the killing of US citizens by drones to the Senate Intelligence Committee. The decision follows the leak of a white paper, believed to summarize the full 50-page document senators have now received, which <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/05/doj_memo_its_legal_to_kill_americans_with_drones/">this week drew sharp criticism from legal experts</a>. A group of 11 senators led by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) wrote to the White House demanding to see the legal opinion and threatening to hold off on Brennan's appointment were it not released. According to the <a href="http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BRENNAN_CIA?SITE=AP&amp;SECTION=HOME&amp;TEMPLATE=DEFAULT&amp;CTIME=2013-02-07-07-46-19">AP</a>, Wyden "left open the possibility he might still try to block Brennan's nomination":</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/brennan_hearing_prompts_release_of_kill_list_rationale/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/07/brennan_hearing_prompts_release_of_kill_list_rationale/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate investigating contact between CIA and &#8220;Zero Dark Thirty&#8221; filmmakers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/senate_investigating_contact_between_cia_and_zero_dark_thirty_filmmakers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/senate_investigating_contact_between_cia_and_zero_dark_thirty_filmmakers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 13:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zero Dark Thirty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osama Bin Laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sen. Dianne Feinstein will examine the government's role in the "grossly inaccurate" film]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee, headed by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., has launched an investigation into the CIA's involvement with the Osama bin Laden manhunt dramatization, "Zero Dark Thirty," in an effort to determine what role government staffers had in a movie that politicians have sharply criticized as being "misleading" and "grossly inaccurate."</p><p>Reuters <a href="http://ca.news.yahoo.com/senate-panel-examine-cia-contacts-zero-dark-thirty-001330922.html">broke the news</a> last night, paraphrasing a source close to the Committee, which "will examine whether the spy agency gave the filmmakers 'inappropriate' access to secret material." "They will also probe whether CIA personnel are responsible for the portrayal of harsh interrogation practices and in particular the suggestion that they were effective," Reuters reported.</p><p>The investigation comes weeks after Feinstein, along with Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz. and Carl Levin, D-Mich., <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/mccain_dems_slam_misleading_torture_depiction_in_zero_dark_thirty/">wrote a letter to Sony Pictures CEO Michael Lynton</a> criticizing Kathryn Bigelow's film:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/senate_investigating_contact_between_cia_and_zero_dark_thirty_filmmakers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/03/senate_investigating_contact_between_cia_and_zero_dark_thirty_filmmakers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Feinstein defends domestic surveillance program</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/feinstein_defends_domestic_surveillance_program/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/feinstein_defends_domestic_surveillance_program/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2012 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ron Wyden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D-Ore.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surveillance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spying]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite concerns by fellow Democrats and civil libertarians, the senator says there's ample oversight on spying]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., <a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/274689-feinstein-defends-foreign-surveillance-program-amid-criticism">wanted</a> the answer to a basic question on Thursday: How many Americans does the United States government currently spy on?</p><p>The question arose ahead of a vote over reauthorization of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), a 1978 law permitting the government to spy on correspondence between Americans and foreign individuals. Wyden, leading the charge to challenge the reauthorization, argues that the "Senate cannot say that we passed the smell test with respect to vigorous oversight if we don't have some sense of how many Americans … are being swept up under the legislation."</p><p>A number of FISA provisions passed in recent years are set to expire at the end of this year, and as Politico <a href="http://www.politico.com/story/2012/12/clock-running-out-for-surveillance-law-powers-85144_Page3.html">reported,</a> "[Wyden] has placed a hold on the bill as he seeks information from the federal authorities, who have told Wyden in the past that they can’t deliver that data [on how many Americans are caught up in the surveillance dragnet]. And Wyden said this week that he’ll maintain that hold unless the Senate allows a vote on his amendments to introduce new legal checks and transparency rules to the law."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/feinstein_defends_domestic_surveillance_program/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/27/feinstein_defends_domestic_surveillance_program/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate-approved CIA torture report kept under wraps</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/senate_approved_cia_torture_report_kept_under_wraps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/senate_approved_cia_torture_report_kept_under_wraps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 17:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dianne Feinstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War on Terror]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enhanced interrogation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13125018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 6,000-page investigation challenges the efficacy of enhanced interrogation during the war on terror]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence voted Thursday to approve a 6,000-page report on the use of torture and extraordinary rendition by the CIA, the investigation will for now remain classified. According to<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/dec/13/senate-pressure-cia-interrogation-torture"> the Guardian</a>, Republican senators could push for the extensive report to stay under wraps, despite pressure from human rights advocates to make the information public.</p><p>"I believe it to be one of the most significant oversight efforts in the history of the United States Senate," said chair of the intelligence committee Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif.  She noted that the report is "a comprehensive review of the CIA’s detention program that includes details of each detainee in CIA custody, the conditions under which they were detained, how they were interrogated, the intelligence they actually provided and the accuracy — or inaccuracy — of CIA descriptions about the program to the White House, Department of Justice, Congress and others."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/senate_approved_cia_torture_report_kept_under_wraps/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/14/senate_approved_cia_torture_report_kept_under_wraps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congress will investigate FBI&#8217;s handling of Petraeus affair</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/congress_will_investigate_fbis_handling_of_petraeus_affair/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/congress_will_investigate_fbis_handling_of_petraeus_affair/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 16:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paula Broadwell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate Intelligence Committee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13069378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Senate committee says it will look into why the White House and Congress were not immediately informed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate Intelligence Committee says it will investigate why the FBI did not immediately inform the White House and Congress when it learned that David Petraeus was having an affair, Bloomberg News reports.</p><p>The FBI reportedly learned of Petraeus' affair with his biographer, Paula Broadwell, in late summer, but only told top officials at the FBI and Department of Justice at the time. The White House and Congress only learned of the affair last week, shortly before Petraeus resigned as CIA Director.</p><p>The FBI learned of the affair in the course of an investigation into harassing emails sent by Broadwell to Jill Kelley, a Florida woman who served as an "unpaid social liaison to MacDill Air Force Base, site of the military’s Central Command and Special Operations Command," according to the AP.</p><p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-11-11/fbi-probe-uncovered-petraeus-affair-following-complaints">Bloomberg</a> reports:</p><blockquote><p>California Senator Dianne Feinstein, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said she hasn’t been told the second woman had an affair with Petraeus. 'She was frightened and went to the FBI,' said Feinstein, a Democrat, appearing yesterday on 'Fox News Sunday.'</p></blockquote><p>&nbsp;</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/congress_will_investigate_fbis_handling_of_petraeus_affair/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/11/12/congress_will_investigate_fbis_handling_of_petraeus_affair/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
