<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > sequels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sequels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The worst movie sequel titles of all time</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/the_worst_movie_sequel_titles_of_all_time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/the_worst_movie_sequel_titles_of_all_time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taken 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taken 3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad movie titles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13336611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eye-roll-worthy titles like "The Last Exorcism Part II" and "I'll Always Know What You Did Last Summer" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite his <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/10/10/producers_on_making_taken_3_weve_taken_everyone_we_can_take/">better judgment</a>, Liam Neeson has signed on for "Taken 3," the third movie in the spy/kidnap action thriller series. Although producers promise that because “We’ve taken everyone we can take -- it’s going to go in another direction," it's hard to imagine that the movie will maintain its box office appeal. That said, "Taken 3" is only the latest in a rich tradition of bad or poorly titles sequels:</p><p><strong>"Aliens" -- 1986, sequel to "Alien"</strong><br /> The title of James Cameron's follow-up to the Ridley Scott sci-fi film basically says, "if you liked 'Alien,' you'll like 'Aliens' ... because there are more of them."</p><p><strong>The Last Exorcism Part II -- 2013, sequel to "The Last Exorcism"</strong><br /> So ... not the Last Exorcism, then?</p><p><strong>"<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/13/arnold_schwarzenegger_confirms_return_as_the_terminator/">Triplets</a>" -- upcoming, sequel to 1988 comedy "Twins"</strong><br /> <strong></strong>Here's the rare case where "Twins 2" would have been a better title. Instead, "Triplets," as the title implies, makes the already improbable sibling duo of Arnold Schwarzenegger and Danny DeVito even less plausible, adding Eddie Murphy into the genetic mix.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/the_worst_movie_sequel_titles_of_all_time/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/06/25/the_worst_movie_sequel_titles_of_all_time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;A Good Day to Die Hard&#8221;: Bruce Willis smirks the Russians to death</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/a_good_day_to_die_hard_bruce_willis_smirks_the_russians_to_death/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/a_good_day_to_die_hard_bruce_willis_smirks_the_russians_to_death/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Action movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[A Good Day to Die Hard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bruce Willis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Die Hard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rolling Stones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john moore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[max payne]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13200547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Arnold and Sly's recent flops, Bruce is back with the latest idiotic but action-packed "Die Hard" sequel]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone and Bruce Willis – with 188 years of life on the planet between them — have all released new action-adventure movies within the last month (pairing themselves conspicuously with younger co-stars), and God help me, I sat through all three. Willis is the baby of the trio at 57, and it’s reasonable to expect that the bewildering and idiotic <a href="http://www.diehardmovie.com/">“A Good Day to Die Hard,”</a> the latest installment of a franchise that has yet to fail at the box office, will prosper where <a href="http://www.salon.com/topic/the_last_stand">“The Last Stand”</a> and <a href="http://bullettothehead.warnerbros.com/">“Bullet to the Head”</a> have bombed. It’s also the worst of the three films, by far, at least if you’re sticking somewhere in the vicinity of old-fashioned ideas about the coherence of plot, characterization and setting, but I recognize that's irrelevant. (For the record, Stallone’s “Bullet to the Head,” while totally cartoonish, is more fun and better made than the other two.)</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/a_good_day_to_die_hard_bruce_willis_smirks_the_russians_to_death/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/02/14/a_good_day_to_die_hard_bruce_willis_smirks_the_russians_to_death/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>