<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > sequester</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sequester/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2013 12:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>My Barbara Lee mistake</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/my_barbara_lee_mistake/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/my_barbara_lee_mistake/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 20:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barbara Lee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13287102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The progressive Oakland Congress member was one of only 29 House Dems who voted against the FAA sequester dodge ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been so dispirited by the way Democrats caved on the FAA “fix” to the sequester bill that I got a fact wrong on <a href="http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/312442-4">C-SPAN’s Washington Journal Wednesday morning</a>.</p><p>Talking about how President Obama’s advisers dismissed the notion of a veto because the bill passed both the House and Senate with veto-proof majorities, I listed some progressives who voted for the bill, including House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Maxine Waters. I also included Rep. Barbara Lee, which was really surprising to me. Surprising, because I was wrong, and she didn’t cave.</p><p>My larger point stands: Although the White House blames the overwhelming congressional vote for its inaction, had the president made voting against the bill a priority for Democrats, the bill would likely still have passed, but not with a veto-proof majority. It only got 41 “no” votes, 29 of them Democrats. (<a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/113-2013/h125">Here's the final vote</a>.) Now that the FAA’s been protected, we’ll likely see other carve-outs – but none will protect Head Start kids or Meals on Wheels recipients. Those of us who thought the August 2011 debt-ceiling "compromise" that led to the sequester deal was <a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/02/27/heres_your_sugar_coated_satan_sandwich/">"a sugar-coated Satan sandwich"</a> were right.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/my_barbara_lee_mistake/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/05/01/my_barbara_lee_mistake/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repeal the sequester, already!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/repeal_the_sequester_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/repeal_the_sequester_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Apr 2013 15:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13284664</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How long is Washington going to let austerity strangle our increasingly meager economic recovery?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Economic forecasters exist to make astrologers look good. Most had forecast growth of at least 3 percent (on an annualized basis) in the first quarter. But we <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-04-26/economy-in-u-s-grows-at-faster-pace-as-consumers-boost-spending.html%5D">learned this morning</a> (in the Commerce Department’s report) it grew only 2.5 percent.</p><p>That’s better than the 2 percent growth last year and the slowdown at the end of the year. But it’s still cause for serious concern.</p><p>First, consumers won’t keep up the spending. Their savings rate fell sharply — from 4.7 percent in the last quarter of 2012 to 2.6 percent from January through March.</p><p>Add in March’s dismal employment report, the lowest percentage of working-age adults in jobs since 1979, and January’s hike in payroll taxes, and consumer spending will almost certainly drop.</p><p>Median household incomes continue to decline, adjusted for inflation. Another report out today showed consumer confidence fell in April.</p><p>Second, the recovery continues to be wildly lopsided. The only thing really keeping it going is the rip-roaring stock market. But the stock market only boosts the wealth of the richest 10 percent of Americans, who own 90 percent of stocks (including 401K retirement accounts).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/repeal_the_sequester_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/29/repeal_the_sequester_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. economy expands 2.5 percent through first quarter</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/u_s_economy_expands_2_5_percent_through_first_quarter_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/u_s_economy_expands_2_5_percent_through_first_quarter_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 13:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax cuts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But government spending has fallen, and the combination of tax increases and budget cuts could slow future growth]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. economic growth accelerated to an annual rate of 2.5 percent from January through March, buoyed by the strongest consumer spending in more than two years. Government spending fell, though, and tax increases and federal budget cuts could slow growth later this year.</p><p>The Commerce Department said Friday that the economy rebounded from an anemic 0.4 percent annual growth rate in the October-December quarter. Consumer spending surged at an annual rate of 3.2 percent — its biggest jump since the end of 2010.</p><p>Growth was also helped by businesses, which responded to the greater demand by rebuilding their stockpiles. And home construction rose further.</p><p>Government spending sank at a 4.1 percent annual rate, led by another deep cut in defense spending. The decline kept last quarter's increase in economic growth below expectations of a 3 percent rate or more.</p><p>Many economists say they think growth as measured by the gross domestic product is slowing in the April-June quarter to an annual rate of just 2 percent. Most foresee growth remaining around that subpar level for the rest of the year.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/u_s_economy_expands_2_5_percent_through_first_quarter_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/u_s_economy_expands_2_5_percent_through_first_quarter_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senate passes bill easing FAA furloughs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/senate_passes_bill_easing_faa_furloughs_ap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/senate_passes_bill_easing_faa_furloughs_ap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Associated Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FAA Furloughs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13282725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The legislation aims to increase staffing and reduce mounting flight delays]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — With flight delays mounting, the Senate approved hurry-up legislation Thursday night to end air traffic controller furloughs blamed for inconveniencing large numbers of travelers.</p><p>A House vote on the measure was expected as early as Friday, with lawmakers eager to embark on a weeklong vacation.</p><p>Under the legislation, which the Senate passed without even a roll call vote, the Federal Aviation Administration would gain authority to transfer up to $253 million from accounts that are flush into other programs, to "prevent reduced operations and staffing" through the Sept. 30 end of the fiscal year.</p><p>In addition to restoring full staffing by controllers, Senate officials said the available funds should be ample enough to prevent the closure of small airport towers around the country. The FAA has said it will shut the facilities as it makes its share of $85 billion in across-the-board spending cuts — known as the sequester — that took effect last month at numerous government agencies.</p><p>The Senate acted as the FAA said there had been at least 863 flights delayed on Wednesday "attributable to staffing reductions resulting from the furlough."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/senate_passes_bill_easing_faa_furloughs_ap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/26/senate_passes_bill_easing_faa_furloughs_ap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Behind the worst economic recovery on record</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/tk_5_partner_10/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/tk_5_partner_10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2013 20:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keynes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush Tax Cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13271553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Until we abandon supply-side tax cuts, the inequality gap will widen and our economy will continue to flounder]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest economic debate is between Keynesians (who want more government spending and lower interest rates in order to fuel demand) and supply-side “austerics” (who want lower taxes on the wealthy and on corporations to boost incentives to hire and invest, and who see government deficits crowding out private investment).</p><p>But both approaches have problems.</p><p>George W. Bush tried supply-side tax cuts but nothing trickled down. Jobs and wages declined. And austerity economics has been a disaster for Europe.</p><p>Unfortunately the U.S. is now adopting supply-side austerics by making the Bush tax cuts permanent for 98 percent of taxpayers, hiking Social Security taxes back up, and implementing the sequester.</p><p>I’m on the Keynesian side. Yet the biggest weakness of modern Keynesian economics is it doesn’t have a clear answer for how much spending is necessary in an economy, like ours, in which wages keep dropping and government debt keeps growing. Simply arguing “more” won’t cut it.</p><p>John Maynard Keynes urged that governments “prime the pump” to stimulate demand but pump priming has limited effect if the well is running dry.</p><p>Both sides of the modern debate have neglected the scourge of widening inequality.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/tk_5_partner_10/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/15/tk_5_partner_10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sequestration&#8217;s stealth assault</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/sequestrations_stealth_assault/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/sequestrations_stealth_assault/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 22:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13265236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taxpayers are already feeling their debilitating effects -- they just don't realize it yet]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, the much-dreaded “sequester” – some $85 billion in federal spending cuts between March and September 30 – hasn’t been evident to most Americans.</p><p>The dire warnings that had issued from the White House beforehand – threatening that Social Security checks would be delayed, airport security checks would be clogged, and other federal facilities closed – seem to have been overblown.</p><p>Sure, March’s employment report was a big disappointment. But it’s hard to see any direct connection between those poor job numbers and the sequester. The government  has been shedding jobs for years. Most of the losses in March were from the Postal Service.</p><p>Take a closer look, though, and Americans are starting to feel the pain. They just don’t know it yet.</p><p>That’s because so much of what the government does affects the nation in local, decentralized ways. Federal funds find their way to community housing authorities, state unemployment offices, local school districts, private universities, and companies. So it’s hard for most Americans to know the sequester is responsible for the lost funding, lost jobs, or just plain inconvenience.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/sequestrations_stealth_assault/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/08/sequestrations_stealth_assault/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama cuts salary in solidarity with sequestered workers</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/obama_cuts_salary_in_solidarity_with_sequestered_workers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/obama_cuts_salary_in_solidarity_with_sequestered_workers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 20:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget Showdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[White House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Treasury]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13260040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president will return 5 percent of his salary to the Treasury]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama will return 5 percent of his salary to the U.S. Treasury, likely amounting to around $20,000, to show his solidarity with the federal employees who will soon be furloughed as part of the sequester.</p><p>From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/04/us/politics/to-highlight-pain-of-budget-cuts-obama-to-return-of-part-of-pay.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss">New York Times</a>:</p><blockquote><p>The voluntary move would be retroactive to March 1, the official said, and apply through the rest of the fiscal year, which ends in September. The White House came up with the 5 percent figure to approximate the level of spending cuts to nondefense federal agencies that took effect that day.</p> <p>“The president has decided that to share in the sacrifice being made by public servants across the federal government that are affected by the sequester, he will contribute a portion of his salary back to the Treasury,” the official said.</p></blockquote><p>Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton Carter said earlier this week that they would do the same.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/obama_cuts_salary_in_solidarity_with_sequestered_workers/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/04/03/obama_cuts_salary_in_solidarity_with_sequestered_workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Let&#8217;s decide the budget ourselves</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/lets_decide_the_budget_ourselves_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/lets_decide_the_budget_ourselves_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Next New Deal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meals-on-Wheels]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13253532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Americans are getting fed up with government. It's time to get them directly involved]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nextnewdeal.net/"><img align="left" style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/05/next-new-deal-logo.png" alt="Next New Deal" /></a> It has been nearly a month since the sequester went into effect, yet little is being done to reverse the deep cuts. It is a sad fact that our new normal is the inability to come to a compromise in Washington.</p><p>Washington has failed the American people over and over again, and yet at each manufactured crisis we cross our fingers and hope that things will be different the next time. With such intense gridlock, it's no wonder that Americans have thrown up their hands. According to a 2011 CBS News <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/06/27/politics/main20074879.shtml">poll</a>, 80 percent of those surveyed believe that Congress is more interested in serving the needs of special interest groups than the constituents they purport to represent.</p><p>So why do Americans simply hope for the best? Why do we not stand up and demand a change? Perhaps it is because the idea of changing the culture of Washington is too daunting, too impossible. But Americans can start building a new system from the ground up that incorporates their voices into the political process.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/lets_decide_the_budget_ourselves_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/27/lets_decide_the_budget_ourselves_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey, guys, there was an election</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/the_big_gop_win_of_2012/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/the_big_gop_win_of_2012/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["grand bargain"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13229688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why House Republicans and their leader are behaving like Obama didn't win]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Thursday, the top Democrat in the House made what amounted to a major concession, <a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/pelosi-lets-take-look-at-chained-cpi">pronouncing herself</a> open to the idea of reducing Social Security benefits. This moved Nancy Pelosi closer to the position that President Barack Obama, who has <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/deficit_reduction_table_bucketed_r8.pdf">already put out</a> a plan that includes chained-CPI, has staked out in pursuit of a deficit reduction "grand bargain" with Republicans. This could make it easier for Obama to convince Senate Republicans, whom he's begun courting in recent weeks, that he can deliver on a deal that includes real sacrifices on Democratic priorities.</p><p>And how does the top Republican in the House fit into this mix? Well, he doesn't.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/the_big_gop_win_of_2012/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/15/the_big_gop_win_of_2012/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>93</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama needs a new joke writer</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/president_obama_needs_a_new_joke_writer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/president_obama_needs_a_new_joke_writer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2013 16:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gridiron dinner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Franken]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beltway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13224595</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nicest thing to say about his Gridiron Dinner appearance is that hopefully his staff had other priorities]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President Obama appeared as the entertainment at last night’s Gridiron Dinner.  The roaster-in-chief walks a fine line at these drunken Beltway confabs. Too often jokes in Washington are too inside baseball or not inside enough, viz. this <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/03/10/remarks-president-gridiron-dinner">groaner</a> he launched from the podium:</p><blockquote><p>As you know, I last attended the Gridiron dinner two years ago.  Back then, I addressed a number of topics — a dysfunctional Congress, a looming budget crisis, complaints that I don’t spend enough time with the press.  It’s funny, it seems like it was just yesterday. (Laughter.)</p></blockquote><p>The transcript, when read sober, was hardly more inspiring. Parentheticals asserting laughter and applause appeared on the official White House transcript and could not be independently verified:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/president_obama_needs_a_new_joke_writer/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/10/president_obama_needs_a_new_joke_writer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can our growth survive the sequester?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/can_our_growth_survive_the_sequester_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/can_our_growth_survive_the_sequester_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[On the Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13222898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new jobs report reveals unemployment is at its lowest level in four years, but the good news may be short-lived]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Payrolls expanded by 236,000 last month and the jobless rate ticked down to 7.7%, its lowest rate since late 2008, outperforming analysts expectations.  Hours worked per week increased and hourly pay rose as well, suggesting a potential improvement in employer demand (though, as noted, some indicators in the report point the other way—these monthly reports are never an analytical slamdunk).</p><p>Whether the better-than-expected results signal a faster underlying trend in job growth, and whether it can withstand the fiscal drag from the sequester, is yet to be seen, a point I return to below.</p><p>Since we want to avoid reading too much into any one month in these volatile data, the smart move is to average the last few months of payroll gains to smooth out the noise.  Doing so reveals some acceleration in hiring: over the past three months, average monthly gains were 191K; over the prior three months, 182K; and over the three months before that, 135K.</p><p>Unemployment is also down from 8.3% a year ago to 7.7% last month, as noted.</p><p>I’ll work up the details throughout the day* but for now, let’s think a bit about what this report may be telling us:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/can_our_growth_survive_the_sequester_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/08/can_our_growth_survive_the_sequester_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s almost like the Tea Party won</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/its_almost_like_the_tea_party_won/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/its_almost_like_the_tea_party_won/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 13:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13220282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The election was a rebuke of austerity -- but the hard right is getting its way on the sequester]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Obama administration is <a href="http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/03/05/17197602-white-house-cancels-tours-citing-sequester?lite">doing its best</a> to make Americans aware of – and enraged by – the impact of the sequester, hoping to pressure Republicans into a deal that will undo the cuts and replace them with the “balanced” deficit reduction framework that the president has been seeking for two years now. But several days into the sequester, it’s starting to feel like the critical mass of outrage that the White House is hoping for may not be reached.</p><p>This doesn’t mean the sequester won’t have a real impact. The domestic spending cuts <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/04/us/politics/poor-face-most-pain-as-automatic-budget-cuts-take-effect.html?ref=todayspaper&amp;_r=0">will force</a> agencies that provide aid to the poor to turn away families that need it, and the combined effects of slashing $85 billion from Defense and domestic programs over the next seven months will slow an economy that’s still struggling to return to health.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/its_almost_like_the_tea_party_won/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/06/its_almost_like_the_tea_party_won/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>49</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sequester could hamper Wall Street investigations</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/sequester_could_hamper_wall_street_investigations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/sequester_could_hamper_wall_street_investigations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 15:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mortgage Crisis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[... which were going so well]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as the righteous hammer of justice was balanced above the malfeasant heads of Wall Street executives -- poised for a strike four years in the making -- that pesky sequester comes along and hampers government investigations into Wall Street fraud.</p><p>As Ryan Grim at HuffPo <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/04/fbi-sequestration-wall-street_n_2807338.html">noted</a> Tuesday, The Federal Bureau of Investigations told <a href="http://www.appropriations.senate.gov/ht-full.cfm?method=hearings.download&amp;id=1a22b1f1-cd48-4ad5-ad49-4446f7a60035" target="_hplink">lawmakers in a recent letter</a> that across-the-board cuts resulting from sequestration "will cause current financial crimes investigations to slow as workload is spread among a reduced workforce. In some instances, such delays could affect the timely interviews of witnesses and collection of evidence."</p><p>"Left unchecked, fraud and malfeasance in the financial, securities, and related industries could hurt the integrity of U.S. markets," wrote FBI Director Robert Mueller III.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/sequester_could_hamper_wall_street_investigations/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/sequester_could_hamper_wall_street_investigations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Must-see morning clip: The sequester is here</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/must_see_morning_clip_the_sequester_is_here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/must_see_morning_clip_the_sequester_is_here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 14:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Must see morning clip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13219126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first penalty of the sequester is Jon Stewart's federal pen program, laments "The Daily Show" host]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>"It will not happen," said President Barack Obama regarding the sequester during the presidential debates.</p><p>"Of course, it willn't," says Stewart. "Democrats and Republicans would have to be incredible incompetent not to be able to avoid this "self-designed and imposed mutual ball punch."</p><div style="background-color:#000000;width:520px;"> <div style="padding:4px;"><iframe src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/embed/mgid:cms:video:thedailyshow.com:424333" width="512" height="288" frameborder="0"></iframe> <p style="text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;"><b><a href="http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-march-4-2013/sequest-out">The Daily Show with Jon Stewart</a></b><br/>Get More: <a href='http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/'>Daily Show Full Episodes</a>,<a href='http://www.indecisionforever.com/'>Political Humor & Satire Blog</a>,<a href='http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow'>The Daily Show on Facebook</a></p> </div> </div><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/must_see_morning_clip_the_sequester_is_here/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/05/must_see_morning_clip_the_sequester_is_here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama&#8217;s post-sequester blueprint</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/obamas_post_sequester_blueprint_partner/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/obamas_post_sequester_blueprint_partner/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 21:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RobertReich.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Build America's Future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13218490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The president needs to reframe public debate about austerity economics as a plan to achieve broad-based prosperity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What should the president do now?</p><p>Push to repeal the sequester (a reconciliation bill in the Senate would allow repeal with 51 votes, thereby putting pressure on House Republicans), and replace it with a “Build America’s Future” Act that would close tax loopholes used by the wealthy, end corporate welfare, impose a small (1/10 of 1 percent) tax on financial transactions, and reduce the size of the military.</p><p>Half the revenues would be used for deficit reduction, the other half for investments in our future through education (from early-childhood through affordable higher ed), infrastructure and basic R&amp;D.</p><p>Also included in that bill — in order to make sure our future isn’t jeopardized by another meltdown of Wall Street — would be a resurrection of Glass-Steagall and a limit on the size of the biggest banks.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/obamas_post_sequester_blueprint_partner/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/obamas_post_sequester_blueprint_partner/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sequestration nation and RFK</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/sequestration_nation_and_rfk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/sequestration_nation_and_rfk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Kennedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Reich]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservatism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13218012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[He would force politicians to talk about the public good]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the sequester now beginning, I find myself thinking about Robert F. Kennedy — and 46 years ago when I was an intern in his Senate office.</p><p>1967 was a difficult time for the nation. America was deeply split over civil rights and the Vietnam War. Many of our cities were burning. The war was escalating.</p><p>But RFK was upbeat. He was also busy and intense — drafting legislation, lining up votes, speaking to the poor, inspiring the young. I was awed by his energy and optimism, and his overriding passion for social justice and the public good. (Within a few months he’d declare his intention to run for president. Within a year he’d be dead.)</p><p>The nation is once again polarized, but I don’t hear our politicians talking about social justice or the public good. They’re talking instead about the budget deficit and sequestration.</p><p>At bottom, though, the issue is still social justice.</p><p>The austerity economics on which we’ve embarked is a cruel hoax — cruel because it hurts those who are already hurt the most; a hoax because it doesn’t work.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/sequestration_nation_and_rfk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/04/sequestration_nation_and_rfk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How budget cuts could affect you</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/03/how_budget_cuts_could_affect_you_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/03/how_budget_cuts_could_affect_you_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 14:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illegal immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automatic cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol_on]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13217451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unemployment benefit reductions, fewer food safety checks, freed illegal immigrants and more]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Automatic spending cuts that took effect Friday are expected to touch a vast range of government services. Some examples:</p><p>DEFENSE</p><p>One of the Navy's premier warships, the aircraft carrier USS Harry S. Truman, sits pier-side in Norfolk, Va., its deployment to the Persian Gulf delayed. The carrier and its 5,000-person crew were to leave Feb. 8, along with the guided-missile cruiser USS Gettysburg. The Navy also began plans to gradually shut down four of its air wings - which include 50 to 60 aircraft each and are assigned to the carriers - and delay and cancel the deployments of several other ships.</p><p>Furlough notices will begin going out later this month to about 800,000 defense department civilians, who will lose a day's pay each week for more than five months. The Army will let go more than 3,000 temporary and contract employees and beginning in April, it will cancel maintenance at depots which will force 5,000 more layoffs. The Air Force Thunderbirds and the Navy's Blue Angels will cancel air show appearances.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/03/how_budget_cuts_could_affect_you_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/03/how_budget_cuts_could_affect_you_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DHS released over 2,000 immigrants</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/dhs_released_over_2000_immigrants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/dhs_released_over_2000_immigrants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Budget cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detention centers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illiegal immigrants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.railrode.net/?p=13216403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looming budget cuts meant the release of illegal immigrants held in vast detention centers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Homeland Security Department released from its jails more than 2,000 illegal immigrants facing deportation in recent weeks due to looming budget cuts and planned to release 3,000 more during March, the Associated Press has learned.</p><p>The newly disclosed figures, cited in internal budget documents reviewed by the AP, are significantly higher than the "few hundred" illegal immigrants the Obama administration acknowledged this week had been released under the budget-savings process.</p><p>The government documents show that Immigrations and Customs Enforcement released roughly 1,000 illegal immigrants from its jails around the U.S. each week since at least Feb. 15. The agency's field offices have reported more than 2,000 immigrants released before intense criticism this week led to a temporary shutdown of the plan, according to the documents.</p><p>The states where immigrants were released include Arizona, California, Georgia and Texas.</p><p>The White House has said it was not consulted about the releases, and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano has acknowledged they occurred in a manner she regrets. White House spokesman Jay Carney on Wednesday said the government had released "a few hundred" of the roughly 30,000 illegal immigrants held in federal detention pending deportation proceedings. Carney said the immigrants released were "low-risk, noncriminal detainees," and the decision was made by career ICE officials.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/dhs_released_over_2000_immigrants/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/dhs_released_over_2000_immigrants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Portrait of a powerless man</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/portrait_of_a_powerless_man/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/portrait_of_a_powerless_man/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 16:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opening Shot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There's only one way for Boehner to save Republicans from themselves on the sequester. And it's going to be ugly]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does John Boehner subject himself to this?</p><p>Not for the first time this year, and probably not for the last, the speaker <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/02/28/politics/violence-against-women/index.html">allowed to the floor on Thursday a major piece of legislation</a> that a solid majority of the Republican Conference voted against, that passed mainly on the strength of Democratic votes, and that the Obama White House will now trumpet as a major achievement. The bill at hand was the Violence Against Women Act, which had easily passed the Senate only to meet with fierce resistance from conservatives in the House. In the end, 138 House Republicans went on the record against it, while 87 backed it. Among Democrats, meanwhile, there wasn’t a single “no” vote.</p><p>We saw this same dynamic at the start of the year, when the fiscal cliff deal <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/house-roll-call-deal-avoid-fiscal-cliff-045929732.html">passed</a> with just 85 Republicans voting “yes” – and 151 voting “no.”  And we saw it a few weeks after that, when a $50.5 billion Sandy aid package <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/house-roll-call-vote-superstorm-aid-163458878.html">cleared the chamber</a> with only 49 Republicans supporting it, and 179 opposing it.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/portrait_of_a_powerless_man/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/portrait_of_a_powerless_man/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>House GOP applauds Boehner for stalled sequester talks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/house_gop_cheers_boehner_for_stalled_sequester_talks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/house_gop_cheers_boehner_for_stalled_sequester_talks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Boehner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sequester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government shutdown]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13215640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congress, meanwhile, is shifting focus to the looming deadline to avert a government shutdown ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Republicans lauded House Speaker John Boehner from walking away from sequester talks, refusing to raise new revenues and demanding that the Senate come up with its own plan.</p><p>On Thursday, Boehner said that “The revenue issue is now closed,” as the House adjourned for the weekend. Though congressional leaders are scheduled to meet with Obama at the White House on Friday, the odds of a deal are increasingly unlikely at this point.</p><p>House Republicans, for one, claimed victory. From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/01/us/politics/house-republicans-cheer-boehners-refusal-to-negotiate-on-cuts.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss&amp;_r=0">New York Times</a>:</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/house_gop_cheers_boehner_for_stalled_sequester_talks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/03/01/house_gop_cheers_boehner_for_stalled_sequester_talks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>