<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Sex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2013 14:21:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Dumb tweet of the day: &#8220;Who invented sex?!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_who_invented_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_who_invented_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dumb tweet of the day]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adam and Eve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bible]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dumb tweet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13160123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Twitter user wonders, because "Adam and Eve were virgins"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[embedtweet id="286591846656901120"]</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_who_invented_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/dumb_tweet_of_the_day_who_invented_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The lie detector test that saved my marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_lie_detector_test_that_saved_my_marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_lie_detector_test_that_saved_my_marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 22:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addiction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lie Detector Test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was a recovering sex addict who couldn't kick his habit. So my wife and I came up with a unique solution ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" align="left" /></a> Men and women in Sexaholics Anonymous and Sex Addicts Anonymous initially come in not remotely sure how to recover. First we deal with the problems that brought us to the meetings—our compulsive, dangerous and often illegal behavior. In SAA, we develop “circles” that define the kind of behaviors that mark us as sex addicts. The “Inner Circle” represents the behaviors we'll never do again—like the drink for the alcoholic, the fix for the drug addict. If we slip, we start counting our time again. In SA, things are defined differently— it's more of a "slippery slope" mentality. Don't do anything that lights the fuse. Don't even masturbate. I've known guys who won't look at a provocative roadside billboard, guys who avert their eyes when they see a panty hose ad in <em>The Financial Times</em>.</p><p>Many of these men and women are in marriages or long-term relationships. Their lives are dysfunctional and they know it. They'll expect to spend months, if not years, in 12-step meetings, individual therapy and marriage counseling in hopes of saving their relationships. If they're lucky, they have understanding partners who can see beyond the addiction.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_lie_detector_test_that_saved_my_marriage/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/the_lie_detector_test_that_saved_my_marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can evolution explain high heels?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2013 20:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Heels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Femininity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[women]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13159812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research offers an unexpected explanation for their allure -- one that has nothing to do with increased height]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> Fashions in dress come and go, but a peculiar one has stayed in style for many generations, and shows no sign of fading away. It’s the <a href="http://www.randomhistory.com/1-50/036heels.html" target="_blank">high-heeled shoe</a>, which first became a fashion statement in 16th-century France, and has been a part of the modern woman’s wardrobe since the mid-19thcentury.</p><p>Ask a woman why she endures the awkwardness and discomfort, and she’ll probably respond, “They make me look, and feel, more attractive.” <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812001225" target="_blank">Newly published research</a> suggests this perception is accurate, but perhaps not for the reason you’d expect.</p><p>It’s not the artificially increased height that turns heads. Rather, it’s how such footwear changes the mechanics of a woman’s gait.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2013/01/02/can_evolution_explain_high_heeled_shoes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My sexual resolutions</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/my_sexual_resolutions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/my_sexual_resolutions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2012 02:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13155358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Five sex-related promises I'm making to myself for the new year -- and you should, too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last year around this time, I wrote about people's <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/01/04/the_sexual_resolution/singleton/">sexual resolutions for the new year.</a> There were pledges to break dry spells, have more orgasms and abstain altogether. At the time, I didn't have any sex-related goals of my own, having completely failed at my single sexual resolution for that year (and within days of January 1, no less): waiting before jumping into bed with new partners.</p><p>But this past year was different: I waited to have sex for the first time since <em>my first time. </em>(It counts even though it was my partner who insisted on it, right?) I suppose you could say that I'm marginally less cynical about sexual resolutions this year and, as a result, I figured I would make some. This way, on December 31, 2013, I'll be able to see just how far I've come, so to speak, or at least be able to measure how horribly I've failed my "li'l Naomi." (I also appropriately <a href="http://prospect.org/article/vagina-myth">re-christened my vagina</a> this year.)</p><p>With the weighty authority of an online sex columnist with a bachelor's degree in English, I hereby recommend that you maybe possibly consider some of these resolutions for yourselves.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/my_sexual_resolutions/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/30/my_sexual_resolutions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>75</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is my vibrator ruining my relationship?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/is_my_vibrator_ruining_my_relationship/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/is_my_vibrator_ruining_my_relationship/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex toys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vibrators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hitachi Magic Wand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156894</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I thought my boyfriend would be amused when I ordered another sex toy. Apparently, it was one too many]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not long ago, I informed my boyfriend that I had ordered a Hitachi Magic Wand to keep at his place in New Jersey. (Yes, Amazon sells them, and as of this writing, it's their <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Best-Sellers-Health-Personal-Care-Sex-Toys/zgbs/hpc/3777811">bestselling toy</a>). I thought he’d be excited, perhaps — or, at worst, simply amused. Instead, I could practically hear the disdain over Gmail.</p><p>“Do you even need me to come home anymore?” he asked.</p><p>As a sex writer, I have a lot of toys, and this wasn’t the first time I’d bought the so-called Cadillac of vibrators, an extremely powerful plug-in electrical massager that's been my go-to sex toy for over a decade. I already had one at my apartment in Brooklyn, but I wanted one for the long stretches of time I spent at his place, and the toy is way too large and unwieldy to cart back and forth.</p><p>"It’s just a vibrator,” I told him. “Of course I need and want you.” That seemed obvious to me, but it wasn't as clear to him. As I probed further, I discovered I had tripped into sensitive territory. Owning one Hitachi Magic Wand was all right, but apparently two was overload, even for a boyfriend who once worked in marketing for a sex toy company.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/is_my_vibrator_ruining_my_relationship/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/is_my_vibrator_ruining_my_relationship/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>86</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Measure of my manhood</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/measure_of_my_manhood/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/measure_of_my_manhood/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Body Wars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Masculinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life stories]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13156509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every guy worries about the size of his unit. Imagine the added pressure of being black]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s no moment more anxiety-inducing in a young man’s life than the first time he measures his penis. OK, maybe that’s just me. I was terrified. First of all, I couldn’t find a ruler. I had aged out of the grade where rulers were put on the school supplies list, and any ones that were left over had been lost or broken. I considered measuring against the spine of a book, but my naked-eye measurement would still only get me a ballpark answer. I needed to know the exact measurement. I finally found a ruler, one I had kept from years before, which featured all the NBA Western Conference team logos on it. Why no, this wasn’t embarrassing.</p><p>I also had the added pressure that comes with being black. That all black men have huge penises is the one stereotype we don’t riot in the streets over. I couldn’t be responsible for bringing shame to the race by walking around with a sub-nine-inch penis. What would my ancestors think? I could only hope that Marcus Garvey wasn’t looking down from the heavens shaking his head in disgust at my lack of girth.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/measure_of_my_manhood/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/29/measure_of_my_manhood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In defense of the foreskin</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/in_defense_of_the_foreskin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/in_defense_of_the_foreskin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Narratively]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreskin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circumcision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Judaism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Penis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Intact-ivists," a diverse group of men opposed to circumcision, share a common, if unorthodox, mission]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://narrative.ly/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/09/Narratively-LOGO-NO-NYC-copy-300x196.jpg" alt="Narratively" align="left" /></a> After twenty-seven years on this planet, I learned last week that I am not only a victim of mutilation, but also an amputee; I just hadn’t known it. Like millions of other men, I was, as a baby, circumcised. I never really thought anything of it until my editors directed me to a Yahoo! Group—yes, they still exist—that serves as the online home of the New York City chapter of NORM, the National Organization of Restoring Men.</p><p>Since the early ’80s, men who have been unsatisfied by their “cuts” have banded together for the cause and formed acronym-heavy groups with varying degrees of wit: Brothers United for Future Foreskins (BUFF), UNCircumcising Information and Resources Centers (UNCIRC), and Recover A Penis (RECAP), among many others. The spectrum is wide, yet the mission remains relatively stable: These dudes want their foreskins back, and they want them now. Plus, they don’t want any more unsuspecting babies to get snipped.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/in_defense_of_the_foreskin/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/in_defense_of_the_foreskin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 decisions that prevent the right from controlling your sex life</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/10_decisions_that_prevent_the_right_from_controlling_your_sex_life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/10_decisions_that_prevent_the_right_from_controlling_your_sex_life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 12:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlterNet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christianity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13153771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[These landmark cases have helped preserved some of our most fundamental freedoms]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alternet.org"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://images.salon.com/img/partners/ID_alternetInline.jpg" alt="AlterNet" align="left" /></a> If the Christian Right had its way, the United States would be a fundamentalist theocracy in which contraception, homosexuality, abortion, sexually explicit hip-hop lyrics and all adult pornography were illegal. But making the U.S. that much of a theocracy would mean overturning a lot of major Supreme Court decisions. Over the years, the U.S. Supreme Court has had many rulings that helped to advance sexual freedom in the United States—and it will be easier to protect those advances if fewer socially conservative justices of the Antonin Scalia/Clarence Thomas variety are appointed in the future.</p><p>Certainly, the Christian Right would have had a better chance of bringing more hardcore social conservatives to the High Court if Republican Mitt Romney had been elected president on November 6, whereas President Barack Obama has shown a tendency to nominate justices who are at least centrist in their judicial philosophy. And now that Obama is getting ready to begin his second term, he will be more likely to appoint justices who will uphold or perhaps even expand Supreme Court decisions that are favorable to gay rights (<em>Lawrence v. Texas</em>), contraception (<em>Griswold v. Connecticut</em> and <em>Eisenstadt v. Baird</em>), or one’s right to possess sexually explicit adult erotica (<em>Stanley v. Georgia</em>).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/10_decisions_that_prevent_the_right_from_controlling_your_sex_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/24/10_decisions_that_prevent_the_right_from_controlling_your_sex_life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China’s schizophrenic sexual revolution</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/china%e2%80%99s_schizophrenic_sexual_revolution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/china%e2%80%99s_schizophrenic_sexual_revolution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual revolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prostitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[brothels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Communism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LA Review of Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13152769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The nation's government is letting brothels proliferate, so why is pornography still under attack?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.lareviewofbooks.org/"><img style="margin: 0 10px 0 0;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/06/LARB_LOGO_RED_LIGHT1.jpg" alt="Los Angeles Review of Books" align="left" /></a><br /> The brothel downstairs from my Shanghai apartment, like so many similar establishments across China, masqueraded as a foot massage parlor. But only the densest or most desperate massage seeker would have mistaken it for a purveyor of the painful rubdowns prescribed in traditional Chinese medicine. Most nights young women in short shorts and exaggerated makeup lounged in the massage chairs in varying degrees of boredom, and the space was lit in pink. The imprint of a foot on the placard outside was about all that kept up the ruse.</p><p>As far as neighbors went, the sex workers were fine — quiet, courteous, not prone to cooking stinky tofu. The few times my clothes fell from the bamboo poles used to dry laundry in China, they saved the garments for me until I could make the trek downstairs to retrieve them. We didn’t share an entrance, though a window in the back of the parlor opened onto my stairwell, and on my way home on hot nights I would see the women brushing their teeth. (Even the room that doubled as a kitchen and bathroom glowed fuchsia.) As the years passed I rarely had reason to think about the brothel. But it remained a difficult thing to explain to overseas guests, invariably evoking one of those questions about China that evade any quick, pat answer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/china%e2%80%99s_schizophrenic_sexual_revolution/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/23/china%e2%80%99s_schizophrenic_sexual_revolution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Think more about sex!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/think_more_about_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/think_more_about_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 23:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alain de Botton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13149048</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a new book, philosopher Alain de Botton urges us to consider the act more often -- but also more intelligently]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem isn't that we're thinking too much about sex, it's that we're thinking about it in all the wrong ways. That's the argument of philosopher Alain de Botton in his latest digestible treatise, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/125003065X/?tag=saloncom08-20">"How to Think More About Sex,"</a> which attempts to set us straight without neutering us. It's a bite-sized book that applies a philosophical lens to our modern sexual reality -- from infidelity to impotence, intimacy to Internet porn (and those are just the i's).</p><p>But it's no Human Sexuality textbook: De Botton, author of the bestseller "How Proust Can Change Your Life," is more concerned with big ideas than hard evidence. For example, he writes, "The more closely we analyze what we consider 'sexy,' the more clearly we will understand that eroticism is the feeling of excitement we experience at finding another human being who shares our values and our sense of the meaning of existence."</p><p>This seems intuitively true and wise, doesn't it? But desire is not so easily explained. It requires great temerity to make such grand, un-footnoted generalizations given that sex researchers continue to devote their lives to finding empirical evidence to answer such big questions, and such research is often highly nuanced and not easily summarized.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/think_more_about_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/think_more_about_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The year in sex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/the_year_in_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/the_year_in_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2012 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Best of 2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kristen Stewart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50 Shades of Grey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Petraeus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sandra Fluke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151167</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Affairs! Mommy porn! Gay marriage! A look back at the moments that defined our sexual culture in 2012]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was a good year for sex (it always is). Whether it was K-Stew's infidelity or kinky "mommy porn," we just couldn't stop talking about it. Here's a handy guide to what defined our sexual culture in 2012.</p><p><strong>Infidelity, sex tapes and <strong>scandal </strong>-- oh my!</strong></p><p>You would think <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewinsky_scandal">it was 1998 </a>from our shock at the power of sex to take down powerful men. But no, it's 2012, and we still find ourselves shaking our heads at the thought that David Petraeus could risk his position as head of the CIA by carrying on an extramarital affair with his biographer, that a team of Secret Service agents could put their jobs on the line for a Colombian prostitute or that Chinese politicians could be captured in flagrante at a <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/racy-online-photos-chinese-sex-party-viral-speculation-communist-party-officials-involved-article-1.1137584">sex party</a> or fall for a so-called <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/sex-tape-bribe-chinese-official-viral-article-1.1208844">"honey trap."</a> We're astounded that Kristen Stewart could possibly desire more than Edward Cullen himself or that 76-year-old <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/07/21/poor_fred_willard/">Fred Willard</a> could be arrested at an adult theater. And when our upstanding neighbors are revealed to be clients of <a href="http://bostinno.com/2012/11/26/alexis-wright-client-list-police-reveal-more-johns-in-zumba-prostitution-case-photos/">the "Zumba prostitute,"</a> we still clasp our pearls.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/the_year_in_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/22/the_year_in_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Former track Olympian found to be leading double life as an escort</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/former_track_olympian_found_to_be_leading_double_life_as_an_escort/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/former_track_olympian_found_to_be_leading_double_life_as_an_escort/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2012 13:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suzy favor hamilton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[runner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[athlete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[World-class athlete Suzy Favor Hamilton says that she made "a huge mistake"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With endorsements from Nike, Reebok and Clairol, three-time U.S. Olympian Suzy Favor-Hamilton was a household name in the early 2000s, considered to be the top female runner in the U.S. at the time. Now, <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/suzy-favor-hamilton-136952">The Smoking Gun has uncovered</a> that most decorated female athlete in NCAA track and field history has been leading a double life as a high-priced call girl since December of last year.</p><p>Favor-Hamilton, 44, had been working for the illegal Haley Heston’s Private Collection operation under the alias "Kelly Lundy," in various cities across the U.S., including Las Vegas, Chicago and Los Angeles, while simultaneously running a real estate brokerage in Madison, Wis. with her college-sweetheart-turned husband and their 7 year-old daughter. Favor-Hamilton, who also delivers motivational speeches and does promotional work for Disney, described her call-girl life as an "exciting" break from her routine.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/former_track_olympian_found_to_be_leading_double_life_as_an_escort/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/21/former_track_olympian_found_to_be_leading_double_life_as_an_escort/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My twisted rehab sex life</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/my_twisted_rehab_sex_life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/my_twisted_rehab_sex_life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2012 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Fix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Substance Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13151525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some say you shouldn't hook up with anyone during your first year of sobriety. I found out the hard way]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thefix.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://www.thefix.com/sites/all/themes/thefix/images/logo.png" alt="the fix" align="left" /></a>  Alicia was a blonde bombshell with all the right curves and thick, lush lips. Angelina Jolie lips. One look and I had to have her. At any cost. She was the answer to all my problems. No one could convince me otherwise—not my counselor, my parents, my lawyer, my prescribing doctor.</p><p>We were residents at a strict segregated rehab in Southern California, and communication between opposite sexes was extremely limited. This made the task of seducing Alicia all the more daunting, more exciting and more intense. I was a serious drug abuser: I’d do anything for intensity.</p><p>I started by violating the “sprinkler rule,” a strictly enforced regulation that forbids men and women from holding eye contact for more than three seconds—or around the time it takes for a lawn sprinkler to pass by a patch of grass. I ignored this rule. In fact, for a few days I sat in the lounge gazing intently at Alicia until she noticed. Somehow, she received my message without being creeped out—at least not entirely. But how could I be sure? We had never spoken a word.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/my_twisted_rehab_sex_life/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/20/my_twisted_rehab_sex_life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird news: Worker&#8217;s comp covers sex mishap</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/weird_news_workers_comp_covers_sex_mishap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/weird_news_workers_comp_covers_sex_mishap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 23:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[From the Wires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weird news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13148110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Australian bureaucrat was injured while having sex in a motel]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CANBERRA, Australia — An Australian court has ruled that a bureaucrat who was injured while having sex on a business trip is eligible for worker's compensation benefits.</p><p>The Full Bench of the Federal Court ruled Dec. 13 in favor of the woman, who cannot be identified for legal reasons, and rejecting the appeal of the federal government's insurer.</p><p>The woman was hospitalized after being injured in 2007 during sex with a male friend while staying in a motel in the town of Nowra, 160 kilometers (100 miles) south of her hometown of Sydney.</p><p>During the sex, a glass light fitting was torn from its mount above the bed and landed on her face, injuring her nose and mouth. She later suffered depression and was unable to continue working for the government.</p><p>Her claim for worker's compensation for her physical and psychological injuries was initially approved by government insurer Comcare, then rejected after further investigation.</p><p>An administrative tribunal agreed with Comcare that her injuries were not suffered in the course of her employment, saying the government had not induced or encouraged the woman's sexual conduct. The tribunal also found the sex was "not an ordinary incident of an overnight stay" such as showering, sleeping and eating.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/weird_news_workers_comp_covers_sex_mishap/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/weird_news_workers_comp_covers_sex_mishap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why is the shooter always male?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/why_is_the_shooter_always_male/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/why_is_the_shooter_always_male/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[male violence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass killing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serial muders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13147437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stats don't lie. Instead of asking why America is so violent, perhaps we need to focus on one particular sex]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A common demand made of socially marginalized groups is that they take responsibility for the bad acts of their members.  These demands come both from socially privileged people who marginalize social outsiders and from the socially marginalized themselves.</p><p>For instance, I just Googled “black on black crime,” and the <a href="http://www.theroot.com/buzz/where-outcry-when-attack-black-black">very first link </a>that came up  was to a blog post by an African-American writer, discussing the relative lack of attention the writer claimed the African-American community pays to crimes committed by black people against other black people.</p><p>This is an example of how, in America, a white person who commits a crime is merely a criminal, while a black person who commits a crime is a <em>black </em>criminal.  In other words, being black in America tends to make one a member of what sociologists call a “marked category.”</p><p>The easiest way to explain what that means is to contrast it with its opposite: If I ask you to picture a police officer, what does this person look like?  I’m pretty confident that, whatever other characteristics the person may have, he is a man – just as if I ask you to picture a kindergarten teacher, you almost certainly will conjure up an image of a woman. We don’t usually notice the gender of male police officers because we expect police officers to be men: In this context, maleness is an unmarked category.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/why_is_the_shooter_always_male/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/17/why_is_the_shooter_always_male/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>134</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A legal defense of donkey sex</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/a_legal_defense_of_donkey_sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/a_legal_defense_of_donkey_sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 21:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13124157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A man accused of feeling up a farm animal argues an anti-bestiality law is unconstitutional. Does he have a point?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prosecution of a Florida man accused of having sexual contact with a miniature donkey is unconstitutional, according to his lawyers.</p><p>In a court motion, the <a href="http://www.ocala.com/article/20121211/ARTICLES/121219937?p=2&amp;tc=pg">defense claims</a> that the state law against bestiality deprives 32-year-old Carlos Romero of his "personal liberty and autonomy when it comes to private intimate activities."</p><p>But it's actually not <em>quite</em> as crazy a move as it might seem. The lawyers aren't arguing that Romero necessarily has a right to sex with donkeys, or any other farm animals for that matter. They're specifically targeting the language of <a href="http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2011/0344/BillText/Filed/PDF">Florida's anti-bestiality law</a>, which does not require proof that an animal has been harmed or "of the sexual activity being non-consensual," or even of penetrative sexual contact.</p><p>The attorneys write, "Therefore, the only possible rational basis for the statute is a moral objection to sexual acts considered deviant or downright 'disgusting.'" And that, they argue, is unconstitutional: "The personal morals of the majority, whether based on religion or traditions, cannot be used as a reason to deprive a person of their personal liberties."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/a_legal_defense_of_donkey_sex/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/13/a_legal_defense_of_donkey_sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Better than actual porn!</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex and love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13117460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boom in X-rated animated photos and GIFs may evidence shrinking attention spans, but they're unlikely to take over]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew that X-rated GIFs had truly come of age when porn star Kimberly Kane <a href="https://twitter.com/kimberlykane/status/276576034986532865">tweeted</a> earlier this week that they were "better than actual porn." I'd heard similar proclamations from pornoisseur friends, but a celebrated adult performer calling it the pinnacle of smut? Now that is something.</p><p>For those of you who are visiting the World Wide Web for the first time ever, a GIF is a <a href="http://www.techterms.com/definition/gif">static or animated, looped image</a> that's been compressed for quick loading. The rest of you have probably come across your fair share of GIFs showing <a href="http://www.gifbin.com/981986">dramatic reactions</a>, <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/fjelstud/the-definitive-collection-of-cat-gifs">catly shenanigans</a>, <a href="http://www.buzzfeed.com/ryanhatesthis/the-animated-gif-guide-to-hillary-clintons-adorab">dancing politicians</a> or Ryan Gosling doing <a href="http://www.vh1.com/celebrity/2011-08-08/the-ultimate-ryan-gosling-gif-wall/">any number of things.</a> Most GIFs are meant for laughs, but, increasingly, they're being designed to tickle a different bone.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/09/gif_porn_the_new_gonzo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The world&#8217;s worst online daters</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_worlds_worst_online_daters/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_worlds_worst_online_daters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From shirtless pics to graphic come-ons, sites are calling out dating profiles for a laugh -- and commiseration]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's an overabundance of men flexing their abs while taking selfies in the bathroom mirror. Worse are the guys lifting their shirts, Situation-style, or hoisting up their strained biceps. It's a cornucopia of Weiner-esque chest-shaving and torso-gazing, and it is intended for our comedic entertainment.</p><p>Just ... not originally.</p><p>The shots are found on the Instagram account <a href="http://instagram.com/antidates/">Antidates</a>, which carries the explanatory tag line, "actual responses to dating ads. they never had a chance." It's one of several sites that have popped up with the express purpose of making fun of tactless online daters -- and the vast majority happen to be men attempting to court women. (This is no doubt in large part because men are more often the initiators on online dating sites, and there is something inherently awkward about initiating contact with a person you've only met virtually.) It isn't just absurd self-portraits -- most of the sites focus on outrageous come-ons, off-putting self-descriptions and horrific misspellings.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_worlds_worst_online_daters/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/06/the_worlds_worst_online_daters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The package deal</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/the_package_deal/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/the_package_deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Entertainment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jon Hamm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phallus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael fassbender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magic Mike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Gere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greco-roman art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[boner rower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13110601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More actors are seen going commando and full-frontal: Is this a sign they're relinquishing their masculinity?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This may go down in history as the year the penis became omnipresent. A symbol of power since the Greco-Roman era, the phallus’s prowess in America’s post-fig leaf society has resided largely in its invisibility. But this year the penis suddenly became visible even when it wasn’t. Last month, from within his trousers, <a href="http://jonhammswang.tumblr.com/">Jon Hamm’s bulge</a> upstaged his campaign for Obama. In October, New York’s Mayor Bloomberg appeared turned on, in more ways than one, as he held a Hurricane Sandy press conference. And who can forget the Boner Rower whose Olympic bronze medal appeared to be crowned by a public happy ending? The recent swell in penises on the big screen has served to dismantle the symbolic power of the phallus and, in a time where reality and entertainment are blurred, it is little wonder that celebrities’ off-duty members are commanding our attention as much as Judd Apatow’s penile punch lines – and shedding their masculine mystique at the same time.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/the_package_deal/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/05/the_package_deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study: &#8220;Slut-shaming&#8221; won&#8217;t go away</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/study_slut_shaming_wont_go_away/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/study_slut_shaming_wont_go_away/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2012 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pacific Standard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women's Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=13114548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New research reveals that 50 years after the introduction of the pill, sexual double standards are alive and well]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.psmag.com/"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 0pt 0pt;" src="http://media.salon.com/2012/08/PacificStandard.color_1.gif" alt="Pacific Standard" align="left" /></a> For women, engaging in casual sex still carries a stigma, and the prospect of being judged dampens their interest in one-night stands.</p><p>That’s the key finding of a <a href="http://pwq.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/11/26/0361684312467169.abstract" target="_blank">newly published study</a> that suggests sexual mores remain stubbornly stable. It concludes that, more than a half-century after the <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/pill/timeline/timeline2.html" target="_blank">introduction of the birth control pill</a>, the sexual double standard is alive and well and still influencing women’s everyday behavior.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/study_slut_shaming_wont_go_away/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/12/04/study_slut_shaming_wont_go_away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>