<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Sex</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sex/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Taxing strip clubs for rape</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/taxing_strip_clubs_for_rape/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/taxing_strip_clubs_for_rape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12927513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Politicians are holding adult entertainment venues responsible for funding sexual assault services]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It used to be that strip clubs were merely blamed for society's ills. Now they're actually being charged for it.</p><p>In recent years, measures have been introduced in Georgia, Pennsylvania, Texas, Illinois and, most recently, California to apply special taxes to strip clubs -- specifically to fund sexual assault services. Now, even if you <em>aren't</em> inclined to view erotic entertainment as the source of all evil, this might seem an appropriate aim -- who wants to argue against additional support for rape survivors? It would seem even more so when you consider politicians' and activists' repeated claims of solid scientific evidence showing a link between strip clubs -- specifically those that sell alcohol -- and sexual violence.</p><p>That is, until you look at the alleged proof.</p><p>The key study advocates point to is one commissioned by the Texas Legislature in 2009. But that very report states, "no study has authoritatively linked alcohol, sexually oriented business, and the perpetration of sexual violence." What's more, when I talked to Bruce Kellison, director of the Bureau of Business Research at the University of Texas at Austin, and one of the authors of the report, about the alleged link between strip clubs and sexual assault, he said, "That's not really what our study was trying to do."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/taxing_strip_clubs_for_rape/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/27/taxing_strip_clubs_for_rape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Massage therapists rubbed wrong by sex talk</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/massage_therapists_rubbed_wrong_by_sex_talk/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/massage_therapists_rubbed_wrong_by_sex_talk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12924275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Jennifer Love Hewitt show and the Travolta allegations have masseuses tired of being confused for sex workers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, a licensed massage therapist, knows what it’s like having a famous client who expects something extra. He had an Academy Award-winning actor begin gyrating on his massage table before raising his hips in the air to show off his erection. “He was hoping that I would play with him in some shape or form,” he says.</p><p>Needless to say, Joe isn't surprised by <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/sns-rt-gloria-allred-john-travolta-lawsuitmt1thewrap4014-20120516,0,305056.story">allegations by two masseurs</a> that John Travolta got handsy during massages. (Travolta's attorney has <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/21/showbiz/travolta-lawyer-fight/index.html">denied</a> all the allegations, and called them "ridiculous.") “It happens all the time,” he says, and not just with celebrity clients. He frequently encounters men who try to fondle him, usually while he’s working on their glutes or lower back and their hand happens to be level with his crotch. “They think they’re so original, but they’re all so much the same,” Joe says, his voice rising. “They all use the same tactics, the same body movements, the same gyrations and grinding my table, the [heavy] breathing.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/massage_therapists_rubbed_wrong_by_sex_talk/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/22/massage_therapists_rubbed_wrong_by_sex_talk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A night at the vibrator museum</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/20/a_night_at_the_vibrator_museum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/20/a_night_at_the_vibrator_museum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early vibrators were hand-cranked, two-person jobs -- and prescribed by doctors. How far we've come since then]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can now say that I've used a turn-of-the-century vibrator -- on my hand, but still.</p><p>The silver, hand-cranked contraption is usually kept behind glass at Good Vibrations' <a href="http://www.antiquevibratormuseum.com/">Antique Vibrator Museum</a> in San Francisco -- but staff sexologist Carol Queen made a rare exception. "This is very special," she whispered, unlocking the case and carefully pulling out Dr. Johansen's Auto Vibrator, a relic from 1904. The "auto" part is not so much: It was a two-person job, with her having to crank the device's handle to get it thrumming. Pressing my finger tips to its inch-wide circular platform of pleasure, I was pleasantly surprised by its power.</p><p>As I was by the two other vintage vibrators that I got to try out -- the White Cross Electric Vibrator from 1917, which has a pronged aperture that makes it seem like the ancestor of <a href="http://www.jimmyjane.com/shop/form2-p-125.html">Jimmyjane's Form 2</a>, and the Beautysafe Vibrator from the 1940s, which is reminiscent in look, feel and sound to a car waxer.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/20/a_night_at_the_vibrator_museum/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/20/a_night_at_the_vibrator_museum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maggie Gyllenhaal on sexual liberation</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/maggie_gyllenhaal_on_sexual_liberation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/maggie_gyllenhaal_on_sexual_liberation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12922227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The beloved indie star tells Salon about her "vibrator movie" and why she loves playing transgressive women]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I met Maggie Gyllenhaal about six weeks ago, she was enormously and gloriously pregnant, stretching out on a sofa with her shoes off and feet up in a Manhattan office building. (Since that time, Gyllenhaal and husband Peter Sarsgaard have welcomed their second daughter, Gloria Ray, to the world.) We were there to talk about <a href="http://www.sonyclassics.com/hysteria/">"Hysteria,"</a> the charming, lightweight feminist farce from director Tanya Wexler that explores a key event in the history of female sexuality: the invention of the vibrator by Mortimer Granville, a Victorian doctor who was seeking to cure the mysterious "female malady" that lends the movie its title.</p><p>While I wouldn't assume there's a vast amount of historical and social accuracy to "Hysteria," it's a lot of fun, and could definitely provide a viable moviegoing alternative for adult women eager to move on from "Iron Man" and "Captain America." Gyllenhaal's character, the crusading feminist and social worker Charlotte Dalrymple, who becomes the comic and romantic foil to Hugh Dancy's stuffy, stammering Granville, might be described as a supporting character who takes over the movie. Charlotte effectively becomes the modern viewer's window into the world of "Hysteria," insisting as a matter of course that women indeed enjoy sexual pleasure (but are often plagued with partners who don't know how to deliver it) and espousing then-outrageous views about women's right to vote, go to college, work outside the home and so on.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/maggie_gyllenhaal_on_sexual_liberation/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/18/maggie_gyllenhaal_on_sexual_liberation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mother-daughter sexperts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/mother_daughter_sexperts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/mother_daughter_sexperts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susie Bright and her daughter, Aretha, make parental talks about sex look easy -- and fun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most parents loathe talking to their kids about the birds and the bees, let alone pubic hair grooming, faked orgasms and "water sports" -- but most parents are not legendary "sexpert" Susie Bright.</p><p>Better than talking about these things, she penned an advice column in 2009 with her daughter, Aretha, then 19, for the ladyblog Jezebel. Their answers to questions about everything from porn to Paxil were unflinching but playful, and at times controversial. Now the pair have collected those columns into a new e-book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mother-Daughter-Sex-Advice-ebook/dp/B0080A92QK">"Mother/Daughter Sex Advice."</a> Together, they read as an irreverent version of "Our Bodies, Ourselves" for the Internet age. The mother-daughter team also reflect on what the experience of writing the column was like, and it turns out it wasn't as weird as many would think: For the most part, it was just a continuation of conversations they had been having throughout Aretha's life.</p><p>I spoke with them both by phone about sex-positive parenting, where they draw the "TMI" line with each other, and their tips for making "the sex talk" less awkward.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/mother_daughter_sexperts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/mother_daughter_sexperts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On the rack: A cultural history of breasts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/on_the_rack_a_cultural_history_of_breasts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/on_the_rack_a_cultural_history_of_breasts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12916820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did breasts evolve for lactation or to enhance sex appeal? A new book explores why they matter]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It's hard to be boobs. Sure, breasts are cherished as givers of milk and the pinnacle of sex appeal, but the modern world hasn't been good to mammaries.</p><p>As Florence Williams writes in "Breasts: A Natural and Unnatural History," they're the most tumor-prone organ in the human body. They "soak up pollution like a pair of soft sponges," and transmit environmental toxins to babies through breast milk. "Breasts are bellwethers for the changing health of people," she says. While we've "genetically modified our crops to be able to protect them from the ill effects of pesticides," Williams writes, "we haven't yet figured out how to modify our breasts." Aside from using saline and silicone, of course.</p><p>Speaking of, breast implants are more popular than ever: It's the most common form of plastic surgery, above even nose jobs and liposuction. Even cosmetic enhancement notwithstanding, breasts are bigger than ever, and girls are getting them at increasingly younger ages. These recent dramatic changes are the heft of Williams' book, although she also covers evolutionary basics, like why we have them, what they're made of and how they work. It's an interesting and engaging read peppered with factoids the kid from "Jerry Maguire" would no doubt appreciate (e.g., "the average breast weighs just over a pound"). Occasionally, it veers into technical territory that will put some readers to sleep, but overall it's a much-needed look at why breasts matter more than we realize, even in our boob-obsessed society.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/on_the_rack_a_cultural_history_of_breasts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/10/on_the_rack_a_cultural_history_of_breasts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-wing sexual pathos</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/right_wing_sexual_pathos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/right_wing_sexual_pathos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attempts to ban talk of birth control and homosexuality from classrooms reveal conservatives' deepest sexual fears]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a high school teacher having to separate a smooching pair outside the classroom door to protect herself from being sued for condoning "gateway sexual activity." Envision a sex education class where the mention of homosexuality is forbidden by law and discussion of contraception, or even puberty, is deemed unnecessary.</p><p>That's the world that would be created by a recent raft of abstinence education bills in Tennessee, Utah and Wisconsin. These initiatives are frightening -- but, viewed the right way, they shine light on extreme conservatives' deepest, darkest fears about sex. They're veritable inkblot tests for right-wing sexual pathos.</p><p>This week saw the passage of a <a href="http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=SB3310">Tennessee bill</a> that has the usual aim of abstinence initiatives -- to "exclusively and emphatically" promote abstinence until marriage. But the bill ultimately goes above and beyond the usual. It allows parents to seek damages in court if a teacher “promotes gateway sexual activity" to their child. It's unclear what exactly "gateway sexual activity” is because the measure defines it vaguely as "sexual contact encouraging an individual to engage in a non-abstinent behavior." Critics of the bill have suggested that this could include everything from hand holding to french kissing. The bill also proscribes "implicitly" promoting or "condoning" gateway sexual activity (the latter could mean simply turning a blind eye to it, hence the example above).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/right_wing_sexual_pathos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/right_wing_sexual_pathos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>157</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The prudes are winning</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/the_prudes_are_winning/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/the_prudes_are_winning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religious Right]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12912280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The author of "America's War on Sex" says things have gotten worse under Obama]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The explosion of government-funded abstinence-only education, extreme assaults on reproductive rights, crackdowns on "indecency" and "obscenity": This is but a small sampling of what spurred sex therapist Marty Klein to publish "America's War on Sex: The Attack on Law, Lust and Liberty" in 2006, midway through George W. Bush's second term. Six years later, under a Democratic presidency, many of the same problems exist -- in fact, in some regards, things have gotten worse.</p><p>That's why Klein has updated the book in <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Americas-War-Sex-Continuing-Psychology/dp/1440801282">a new edition</a> published this week to detail the ways that sexual rights have actually become "increasingly tenuous" under President Obama. Sure, abstinence-only programs have been greatly defunded, but the battle over sex education still rages on -- as do assaults on reproductive rights and all manner of sex-related business, entertainment, expression and experience.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/the_prudes_are_winning/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/the_prudes_are_winning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>22</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Fifty Shades of Grey&#8221;: Dominatrixes take on Roiphe</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/fifty_shades_of_grey_dominatrixes_take_on_roiphe/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/fifty_shades_of_grey_dominatrixes_take_on_roiphe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BDSM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Roles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katie Roiphe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12884371</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As usual, Katie Roiphe misses the point. Women aren't the only ones who find escape in submission]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about men? That was the first thought that came to mind after reading Katie Roiphe's <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/04/15/working-women-s-fantasies.html">Newsweek cover story</a> on the BDSM-themed "Fifty Shades of Grey" phenomenon, in which she controversially speculated that women's current fascination with the book's story line of female submission was the result of the "pressure of economic participation" and the "hard work" of striving for equality. The desire for submission is hardly something unique to women.</p><p>Who understands this better than professional dominatrixes? With so many speculating this week on Roiphe's article, I decided to hand the microphone over to women with a unique perspective on the dynamics in power and play.</p><p>Several said that Roiphe is actually on to something when she talks about submission as an escape from life's stresses -- only, this reasonable point is overwritten by her wrongheaded focus on women and the impact of feminism. Roiphe wonders whether there is "something exhausting about the relentless responsibility of a contemporary woman's life ... all that strength and independence and desire and going out into the world," and suggests "that, for some, the more theatrical fantasies of sexual surrender offer a release, a vacation, an escape from the dreariness and hard work of equality." What about the exhausting, relentless responsibility of contemporary <em>people's</em> lives?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/fifty_shades_of_grey_dominatrixes_take_on_roiphe/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/20/fifty_shades_of_grey_dominatrixes_take_on_roiphe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My favorite john: My very own &#8220;Pretty Woman&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/my_favorite_john_my_very_own_pretty_woman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/my_favorite_john_my_very_own_pretty_woman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[My Favorite John]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon -- After Dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12290491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hector was a handsome Argentine. I was the male escort he hired. What happened next surprised us both]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When people learn that I’m a gay male escort, they invariably ask me how much my life is like the movie “Pretty Woman.”</p><p>“It’s more like ‘Daddy Day Care,’” I usually quip. And while that's meant to be a joke, there’s also some truth to it. I spend a good amount of my work time offering support and advice to men in their 30s and 40s who are just coming out of the closet. Surprised? I was too, at first. But then I thought, where else are these guys going to catch up on two decades of sexual and social experience? Until someone comes out with “Gay for Dummies,” the next best thing is a trained professional.</p><p>A few years ago, for example, a charming man from Vancouver hired me every night for a week while he was in Las Vegas for a conference. By the time he went home we'd checked off every item on his wish list, and he was finally comfortable lying naked with another man. It was strangely gratifying to help a guy learn the ropes.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/my_favorite_john_my_very_own_pretty_woman/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/17/my_favorite_john_my_very_own_pretty_woman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Secret Service scandal: GOP gets ahead of the facts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/secret_service_scandal_gop_gets_ahead_of_the_facts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/secret_service_scandal_gop_gets_ahead_of_the_facts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12871811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We don't know what happened in Colombia, but GOP congressmen are already talking about unlikely sexual blackmail]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Secret Service agents, with their impenetrable black sunglasses and unwavering stoicism, seem anonymous, sexless beings. They are rigorously trained to sacrifice all, including their lives, in the name of their president. And yet even they, in their nun-like devotion, are vulnerable to the lure of easy sex.</p><p>At least, that's the narrative playing out in the news today surrounding allegations of misconduct involving Secret Service agents and a prostitute -- possibly prostitutes, plural -- in Cartagena, Colombia, ahead of the president's visit there. The media has been whipped into a frenzy -- finally, another sex scandal! -- while officials have been quick to offer condemnation, some claiming that the incident could put national security at risk.</p><p>Now, before getting all hot and bothered, let's look at the actual evidence that's available: This happened <em>before</em> the president arrived in the country. The agents in question are not members of the presidential protective division. Officials have said that some of the agents under investigation "may merely have been attending a party and violating curfew," according to <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/secret-service-scandal-obama-calls-rigorous-investigation/story?id=16143158&amp;page=2#.T4xCRZhpDZs">ABC News</a>. Still, Republican congressmen Peter King (N.Y.) and Darrell Issa (Calif.) have claimed that the incident could leave the agents vulnerable to blackmail.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/secret_service_scandal_gop_gets_ahead_of_the_facts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/16/secret_service_scandal_gop_gets_ahead_of_the_facts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>33</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abstinence isn&#8217;t working</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/abstinence_isnt_working/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/abstinence_isnt_working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12864831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Teen births are down, thanks to contraception use. Why does the right ignore the facts and insist it's abstinence?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, when the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db89.pdf">CDC announced</a> a record low in the teen birth rate, it listed two possible causes: "The impact of strong pregnancy prevention messages" and "increased use of contraception." The Guttmacher Institute came out with an even stronger message: "The most recent decline in teen births can be linked almost exclusively to improvements in teens' contraceptive use," the organization said in a press release, which pointed to another CDC study for evidence.</p><p>But that hasn't stopped conservatives from claiming that the drop is a result of, you guessed it, abstinence education and, paradoxically, an increase in abortions.</p><p>Janice Crouse of Concerned Women for America <a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1575076">expressed her outrage</a> over the CDC analysis: "They don't even mention the fact there's been a tremendous increase in effectiveness and pervasiveness of abstinence education. They don't mention the fact that teen sexual activity, by their own admission, is down." As Think Progress <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/04/10/461402/teen-pregnancy-sex-education/">noted this week</a>, teen birth rates are actually <em>highest</em> in states with abstinence-only policies. Not only has it been widely documented that such programs are largely ineffective, it's also been shown that such programs <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Teen-Sex-Ed.html">may prevent</a> contraception use.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/abstinence_isnt_working/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/abstinence_isnt_working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Late Bloomers&#8221;: Can 60-plus sex work on-screen?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/13/late_bloomers_can_60_plus_sex_work_on_screen/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/13/late_bloomers_can_60_plus_sex_work_on_screen/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12865491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isabella Rossellini and William Hurt face a late-midlife sex crisis in the taboo-nudging "Late Bloomers" ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the oldest and most reliable truisms in show business holds that older people -- or people of any age -- will watch a love story about young people, but younger people will rarely or never watch a love story about old people. In other words, Shakespeare knew what he was doing in making Romeo and Juliet teenagers. (Among other things, he was accessing a tradition of doomed youthful romance that goes back at least as far as the Greeks.) I imagine this still holds true as a general rule. Certainly the principal audience for Julie Gavras' comedy "Late Bloomers," which stars Isabella Rossellini and William Hurt as a 60-ish London couple facing a series of marital and personal crises, is not going to overlap much with that of "The Hunger Games."</p><p>But Hollywood's ingrained tendency to ignore people over 50 or so -- with occasional, ultra-weepy exceptions, in the vein of "Cocoon" or "On Golden Pond" -- runs counter to various cultural and demographic realities, both absolute and relative. On one hand, the population is growing older, on average, in the United States and most other Western countries. On the other hand, accepted modes of behavior for older people are shifting. "Late Bloomers" is an entertaining diversion, mostly because Rossellini and Hurt are a pair of seasoned and graceful pros who know how to work every line and every gesture, and it's great to see them playing characters who are exactly their age. (In real life, Hurt is 62 and Rossellini 59.) But in a certain way the movie feels pretty old-fashioned: I'm not sure the social prejudices Gavras tries to mine for laughs here quite exist anymore.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/13/late_bloomers_can_60_plus_sex_work_on_screen/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/13/late_bloomers_can_60_plus_sex_work_on_screen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>39</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rebel girls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/rebel_girls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/rebel_girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2012 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Families]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon -- After Dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12836801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Being an openly bisexual teen in my small town wasn't easy. But I had a great role model: My mom]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“We need to talk,” said my mom. I was 14, and this could have meant any number of ominous things. We’d had many “talks” over the years, most of them related to my adolescent misbehavior, which arrived at 12 in particularly worrying form.</p><p>We sat together at our breakfast counter, she with a mug of Bengal spice tea, me with a glass of OJ. My mother was, and is, a very pretty woman, with bright blue eyes, skyscraper cheekbones, and an easy laugh. She sipped her tea and took a breath.</p><p>“Karen and I aren’t just friends, honey.” Her features tightened, but her eyes met mine, clear and steady. “We’re more than friends.”</p><p>“Yeah, I figured that out,” I said.</p><p>“You did?”</p><p>“Of course!” I gulped. “Jessica and me aren’t just friends, either, you know.”</p><p>“I had a feeling about that.” She nodded with a faint smile.</p><p>Mine was the most amiable coming out story I knew. If only the experience of my early sex life were so breezy.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/rebel_girls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/10/rebel_girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I want to explore</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/i_want_to_explore/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/i_want_to_explore/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Am I Normal?]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon -- After Dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12794461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Am I Normal": A married reader is unsatisfied with his sex life and feels the itch to stray]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>I enjoy reading your columns and use them to some degree to allow myself some reassurance that my sexuality is not something to feel negative about. It is rare for me to see a woman who has complete comfort in her sexuality and makes it her purpose to explore. I spent a large portion of my younger years doing that and, now that I'm married and a father, I find it difficult to satisfy those desires in the way I used to.</strong></p><p><strong>There is part of me that wishes that I was not tied to the relationship I have so that I could continue exploring. It is not that my wife is not interested in joining me so much as it is that we are at different stages. I have a firm grasp on what I want coupled with a bit of fearlessness while she is still coming to know her wants and desires and is not entirely comfortable with where they sometimes lead. What I have been struggling with is: a) Will we ever be at the same place and b) What I am supposed to do in the meantime?</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/i_want_to_explore/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/06/i_want_to_explore/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>When I finally kissed a girl</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/when_i_finally_kissed_a_girl/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/when_i_finally_kissed_a_girl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10749451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Growing up, I felt drawn to my best friend Janet. But I never understood that longing. Until one day -- I did]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In high school, I spent weekends with my best friend Janet. We cuddled and slept like spoons. I would rather do anything with Janet, even homework, than go on a date with my boyfriend, who would drive me to a spot by the canal in his mom’s checkered cab and eat me out, which I discovered was pretty great.</p><p>I went to the University of Pennsylvania during the Reagan years, a time not known for sexual experimentation. I slept with a different guy every month. When a month ended, I got busy, otherwise I’d ruin my record. I would tell Janet the details, which always felt more intimate than the act itself. Janet was waiting for true love. I had been, too, but then decided -- screw it.</p><p>On the last New Year’s Eve before graduation, I went out drinking and dancing with my best friends, the girls I loved most in the world. In the cab to one of our friends' houses, where we were all spending the night, Janet leaned in to me and whispered, “What would you do if I kissed you?”</p><p>I thought, "Does she think I’m a lesbo?" But I said nothing. I couldn’t think of what to say.</p><p>“I think you’d let me,” she said.</p><p>That night, I had sex with my friend's brother.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/when_i_finally_kissed_a_girl/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/04/when_i_finally_kissed_a_girl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook: The next tool in fighting STDs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/01/facebook_the_next_tool_in_fighting_stds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/01/facebook_the_next_tool_in_fighting_stds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12764791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Herpes? Dislike. Cutting-edge sex researchers are using social networks to prevent STDs from going viral]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine being able to download a Facebook app that would alert you to your sexually transmitted infection risk based on your friend's status updates. This may sound far-fetched, and it still is, but as some researchers shift their focus to risk among friend groups, as opposed to just sexual partners, social networks are rapidly becoming a tool to prevent the spread of STIs.</p><p>Peter Leone, a professor of medicine at the University of North Carolina's Center for Infectious Diseases, is one of those experts. Earlier this month, he spoke at an international health conference and underscored the importance of exploring such possibilities. Real-world social networks -- in other words, a person’s circle of friends and sexual partners -- have already proved to be strong predictors of STI risk, he says. It follows that sites like Facebook, which convene all of those real-world connections in one virtual setting, have huge potential in this arena.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/01/facebook_the_next_tool_in_fighting_stds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/01/facebook_the_next_tool_in_fighting_stds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pick of the week: A horny teen-girl manifesto</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/pick_of_the_week_a_horny_teen_girl_manifesto/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/pick_of_the_week_a_horny_teen_girl_manifesto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Our Picks: Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12758171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pick of the week: With its sex-obsessed young heroine, "Turn Me On, Dammit!" goes where few movies have gone]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we first meet Alma (Helene Bergsholm), the blond, almost angelic-looking teenage protagonist of the Norwegian comedy <a href="http://turnmeondammit.com/ ">"Turn Me On, Dammit!,"</a> she's sprawled out on the kitchen floor of her mom's house with her hand down her pants, eagerly following the instructions of some phone-sex dude named Stig. You'll have to trust me that this is the setup for a memorably awkward sight gag and not a creepazoid NC-17 fantasy -- or, to put it another way, if Alma definitely has a dirty mind, the movie doesn't.</p><p>A dry, whimsical and finally sweet film that tries to turn the conventional teenage sex comedy inside out (at least in gender terms), this debut feature from writer-director Jannicke Systad Jacobsen is one of those rare movies that gets better and more complicated the more you think about it. Watching the film is a thoroughly charming experience on its own terms, and then you're left puzzling over all kinds of thorny questions that fail to yield clear answers. Is female sexual desire fundamentally different from male desire? If so, why is that true? Is a teenage girl's sexuality, as one female friend put it, mainly a question of "playing around with her newfound power over the desires of others, rather than an expression of her own desire"?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/pick_of_the_week_a_horny_teen_girl_manifesto/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/30/pick_of_the_week_a_horny_teen_girl_manifesto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rest stop confidential</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/29/rest_stop_confidential/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/29/rest_stop_confidential/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon -- After Dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12455661</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Across America, countless men are meeting up for sex in highway bathrooms. I'm one of them. Here's why]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was 15 the first time I found out that men have sex in public. On the way to Maine with my mom and stepfather, we pulled off the highway and into a rest area. At the urinal, there was a man next to me. He was tall and homely, and holding himself. He stared at me. I was electrified, but held to that spot; he shook himself at me and I couldn’t move. We would have stayed there forever, but another man came in and saw what was happening and scowled. Time started again and I ran out of the bathroom.</p><p>If you’ve ever pulled over to a rest area, you’ve been near men having sex. I’m one of those men, I’ve done it a hundred times; we go into the woods or a truck with tinted windows, in a stall under cold light. It never stops, not for season or time. In the winter, men trudge through snow to be with each other, in the summer, men leave the woods with ticks clinging to their legs. Have you ever stopped at a rest area and found it completely empty? There’s always one man there, in his car, waiting to meet someone new.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/29/rest_stop_confidential/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/29/rest_stop_confidential/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>172</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Working the coregasm</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/working_the_coregasm/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/working_the_coregasm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salon -- After Dark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12739731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New science sheds light on the unexpected pleasure that some women feel during exercise]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“At the end of yoga,” my friend whispers, inching closer, “something sort of … strange happens.” A quick glance around confirms that the good patrons of Starbucks are less interested in her confession than they are in the nearby screaming banshee baby.</p><p>“I usually sit with my feet together and my knees splayed,” she continues tentatively, “for one final stretch before I take shavasana.” I nod her on. So far, I follow. “Leaning over to bring my head down to my feet, as my breath regulates I feel a sort of … tingling and pulsating down (ahem) there. And … the feeling isn’t entirely unwelcome.” She exhales, as if a great weight has lifted. “But I mean, that’s pretty weird, right?”</p><p>Turns out it’s actually not. Exercise-induced female sexual pleasure has been the subject of casual discussion and un-researched speculation for years. Even sexologist Alfred Kinsey mentions the phenomenon in his "Sexual Behaviors in the Human Female" (1953). But until now, the experience was mostly anecdotal. Now, a <a href="http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14681994.2011.647902">study</a> by Indiana University researchers offers scientific evidence that confirms confessions once incredulously traded in gym class locker rooms.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/working_the_coregasm/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/03/27/working_the_coregasm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

