<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salon.com > Sex Education</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salon.com/topic/sex_education/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salon.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 May 2012 06:12:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mother-daughter sexperts</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/mother_daughter_sexperts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/mother_daughter_sexperts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12920469</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Susie Bright and her daughter, Aretha, make parental talks about sex look easy -- and fun]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most parents loathe talking to their kids about the birds and the bees, let alone pubic hair grooming, faked orgasms and "water sports" -- but most parents are not legendary "sexpert" Susie Bright.</p><p>Better than talking about these things, she penned an advice column in 2009 with her daughter, Aretha, then 19, for the ladyblog Jezebel. Their answers to questions about everything from porn to Paxil were unflinching but playful, and at times controversial. Now the pair have collected those columns into a new e-book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Mother-Daughter-Sex-Advice-ebook/dp/B0080A92QK">"Mother/Daughter Sex Advice."</a> Together, they read as an irreverent version of "Our Bodies, Ourselves" for the Internet age. The mother-daughter team also reflect on what the experience of writing the column was like, and it turns out it wasn't as weird as many would think: For the most part, it was just a continuation of conversations they had been having throughout Aretha's life.</p><p>I spoke with them both by phone about sex-positive parenting, where they draw the "TMI" line with each other, and their tips for making "the sex talk" less awkward.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/mother_daughter_sexperts/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/16/mother_daughter_sexperts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Obama&#8217;s in bed with abstinence-only education</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/why_obamas_in_bed_with_abstinence_only_education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/why_obamas_in_bed_with_abstinence_only_education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12916291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Behind the administration's decision to fund a controversial sex education program]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the week since sex educators and activists <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/ab_ed_moves_ahead/singleton/">called out</a> the Obama administration for getting in bed with Heritage Keepers Abstinence Education, the Department of Health and Human Services has stayed silent on why the program had been added to a list of approved, “evidence based” programs for teen pregnancy and STI prevention – until now. In an interview with Salon, HHS spokesman Mark Weber said Heritage Keepers had met the criteria, “gone through a transparent, rigorous review process” and had “demonstrated outcomes” – in this case, delaying sexual activity, and that alone.</p><p>The controversy arose when, sometime in April, Heritage Keepers Abstinence Education was quietly added to an Office of Adolescent Health list of approved groups eligible for government funds -- “the holy grail of the Administration’s commitment to a science-based approach to teen pregnancy prevention and a directive for grantees of the President’s Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative,” <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/04/30/he-men-virginity-pledges-and-bridal-dreams-an-hhs-endorsed-curriculum">wrote</a> four prominent sexual health experts in RH Reality Check. They accused HHS of “succumb[ing] to the political pressure of social conservatives and allowed the ideology of the right to prevail over the health and well-being of the nation’s youth.”</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/why_obamas_in_bed_with_abstinence_only_education/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/08/why_obamas_in_bed_with_abstinence_only_education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>24</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Right-wing sexual pathos</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/right_wing_sexual_pathos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/right_wing_sexual_pathos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attempts to ban talk of birth control and homosexuality from classrooms reveal conservatives' deepest sexual fears]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imagine a high school teacher having to separate a smooching pair outside the classroom door to protect herself from being sued for condoning "gateway sexual activity." Envision a sex education class where the mention of homosexuality is forbidden by law and discussion of contraception, or even puberty, is deemed unnecessary.</p><p>That's the world that would be created by a recent raft of abstinence education bills in Tennessee, Utah and Wisconsin. These initiatives are frightening -- but, viewed the right way, they shine light on extreme conservatives' deepest, darkest fears about sex. They're veritable inkblot tests for right-wing sexual pathos.</p><p>This week saw the passage of a <a href="http://wapp.capitol.tn.gov/apps/BillInfo/Default.aspx?BillNumber=SB3310">Tennessee bill</a> that has the usual aim of abstinence initiatives -- to "exclusively and emphatically" promote abstinence until marriage. But the bill ultimately goes above and beyond the usual. It allows parents to seek damages in court if a teacher “promotes gateway sexual activity" to their child. It's unclear what exactly "gateway sexual activity” is because the measure defines it vaguely as "sexual contact encouraging an individual to engage in a non-abstinent behavior." Critics of the bill have suggested that this could include everything from hand holding to french kissing. The bill also proscribes "implicitly" promoting or "condoning" gateway sexual activity (the latter could mean simply turning a blind eye to it, hence the example above).</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/right_wing_sexual_pathos/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/05/right_wing_sexual_pathos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>157</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ab-ed moves ahead</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/ab_ed_moves_ahead/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/ab_ed_moves_ahead/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 21:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12913118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A sexist, anti-gay abstinence-only program quietly gets the Obama administration's stamp of approval. Why?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just yesterday I wrote of how <a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/the_prudes_are_winning/">the war on sex has gotten worse</a> in recent years and, what do you know, now comes news that an abstinence-only program has been added to the government's list of gold-starred, "evidence-based" programs for pregnancy prevention.</p><p>The Department of Health and Human Services didn't bother to issue a press release about the problematic addition, but a handful of tireless sexual health advocates -- Debra Hauser, Monica Rodriguez, Elizabeth Schroeder and Danene Sorace -- noticed the change on the department's website and today <a href="http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2012/04/30/he-men-virginity-pledges-and-bridal-dreams-an-hhs-endorsed-curriculum">took to RH Reality Check</a> to spread the word. Previously, the only approved abstinence programs on the list were after-school programs.</p><p>The program, Heritage Keepers Abstinence Education, "contains little or no information about puberty, anatomy, sexually transmitted diseases, or sexual behavior," they write, nor does it "include information about the health benefits of contraception or condoms." Worse still, it relies on inaccurate, fear-based classroom exercises, promotes heterosexual marriage as the only happy and healthy life path, harps on the potential harm of premarital relationships, promotes hoary gender roles and stereotypes and entirely ignores the existence of LGBT people.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/ab_ed_moves_ahead/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/05/01/ab_ed_moves_ahead/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>27</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abstinence isn&#8217;t working</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/abstinence_isnt_working/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/abstinence_isnt_working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor's Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=12864831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Teen births are down, thanks to contraception use. Why does the right ignore the facts and insist it's abstinence?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, when the <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db89.pdf">CDC announced</a> a record low in the teen birth rate, it listed two possible causes: "The impact of strong pregnancy prevention messages" and "increased use of contraception." The Guttmacher Institute came out with an even stronger message: "The most recent decline in teen births can be linked almost exclusively to improvements in teens' contraceptive use," the organization said in a press release, which pointed to another CDC study for evidence.</p><p>But that hasn't stopped conservatives from claiming that the drop is a result of, you guessed it, abstinence education and, paradoxically, an increase in abortions.</p><p>Janice Crouse of Concerned Women for America <a href="http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=1575076">expressed her outrage</a> over the CDC analysis: "They don't even mention the fact there's been a tremendous increase in effectiveness and pervasiveness of abstinence education. They don't mention the fact that teen sexual activity, by their own admission, is down." As Think Progress <a href="http://thinkprogress.org/health/2012/04/10/461402/teen-pregnancy-sex-education/">noted this week</a>, teen birth rates are actually <em>highest</em> in states with abstinence-only policies. Not only has it been widely documented that such programs are largely ineffective, it's also been shown that such programs <a href="http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Teen-Sex-Ed.html">may prevent</a> contraception use.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/abstinence_isnt_working/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2012/04/15/abstinence_isnt_working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>132</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solving America&#8217;s teen sex problem</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/30/solving_americas_teen_sex_problem/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/30/solving_americas_teen_sex_problem/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10152751</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dutch have dramatically reduced adolescent pregnancies, abortions and STDs. What do they know that we don't?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When 16-year-old Natalie first started dating her boyfriend, her mother did something that would mortify most American parents: She took her to the doctor's office to get her contraceptives. Her mother wasn't weirded out by the fact that her teen daughter was about to have sex -- in fact, she fully supported it. She merely wanted to make sure that she was doing it safely, and responsibly. A couple of months later, when it finally happened, her parents were totally accepting. As her father put it, "sixteen is a beautiful age" to lose your virginity.</p><p>If that seems like an unfamiliar attitude toward sex and parenting, it might have something to do with the fact that Natalie's parents aren't American -- they're Dutch. They are one of dozens of Dutch families interviewed by Amy T. Schalet, assistant professor of sociology at the University of Massachusetts, in her new book, <a href="http://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/not-under-my-roof-amy-t-schalet/1102669963">"Not Under My Roof."</a> Schalet's book compares the sexual attitudes of American and Dutch parents and her findings are nothing short of staggering: Whereas most American parents panic about the idea of allowing their kids to have sex with other kids under their roof, for many Dutch parents, it's not only fine -- it's responsible parenting.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/30/solving_americas_teen_sex_problem/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/30/solving_americas_teen_sex_problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A sex guide for today&#8217;s girls</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/30/a_sex_guide_for_todays_girls/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/30/a_sex_guide_for_todays_girls/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10153830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an age of Pussycat Dolls and porn, Jaclyn Friedman wants to help young women find an authentic sexual identity]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaclyn Friedman is the sex educator of many parents' nightmares. She's also just the teacher young women need.</p><p>The 39-year-old activist has <a href="http://www.feministe.us/blog/archives/2010/07/26/my-sluthood-myself/">written about</a> looking for hookups on Craigslist's Casual Encounters, expounded on the challenges of <a href="http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2010/03/26/fucking-while-feminist-with-jaclyn-friedman/">"fucking while feminist"</a> and passionately advocated for the "Slut Walk" movement. But regardless of whatever parental discomfort her raunchy CV may inspire, she's written just the sex-advice book that teenage girls – and plenty of their elders -- desperately need right now: "What You Really, Really Want: The Smart Girl's Shame-Free Guide to Sex and Safety."</p><p>Too many books in this genre promise certain drive-your-man-wild tricks, or they take a side in the politicized debate over hookup culture. Friedman instead has one thing on her agenda: Getting girls to explore and embrace their own authentic sexual identities without shame, fear or guilt. Instead of arguing for empowerment through one-night stands or, conversely, abstinence, she leaves it up to young women to decide what it is that's best for them. But she also offers guidance along the way, urging them to critically examine the social pressures and media messages that have shaped their understandings of sexiness, sexual fulfillment and love.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/30/a_sex_guide_for_todays_girls/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/30/a_sex_guide_for_todays_girls/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is porn ruining our love lives?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/is_porn_ruining_our_love_lives/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/is_porn_ruining_our_love_lives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.origin.railrode.net/?p=10146946</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's destroying Cindy Gallop's romps with men raised on smut. Now she's calling for sexual re-education]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy Gallop has intimate experience with how porn is changing sex. That isn't because she's a member of the so-called porn generation -- but because she sleeps with younger men who are.</p><p>The 51-year-old isn't afraid to admit it, either -- in fact, it was her opener when giving a TED Talk two years ago about her business venture, the website <a href="http://makelovenotporn.com/">Make Love Not Porn.</a> A <a href="http://blog.ted.com/2009/12/02/cindy_gallop_ma/">video</a> of the successful British entrepreneur, with her angular blond bob, tight leather pants and stilettos, giving the raunchy four-minute speech at the venerable conference quickly went viral. The popularity of the clip wasn't just a result of her cheeky frankness, but because she articulated something about our modern sexual experience that is either talked about in a moralizing manner or not at all -- that the proliferation of porn is profoundly changing the way that we have sex.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/is_porn_ruining_our_love_lives/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/10/27/is_porn_ruining_our_love_lives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>165</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A sex ed exam &#8212; for adults</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/28/sex_ed_9/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/28/sex_ed_9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2011 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[D.C. is introducing standardized tests about s-e-x in public schools. Can you pass our version for grown-ups?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last week, news broke that Washington, D.C., will require kids in public schools to complete a standardized sex ed test -- the first of its kind in the nation. The announcement <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/give-dcs-new-sex-ed-test-a-chance/2011/09/16/gIQA3OLagK_story.html">sparked controversy</a>, per the usual, as well as bad jokes about "extra credit requirements." Meanwhile, I was left wondering in all seriousness how many <em>adults</em> could actually pass just such an exam.</p><p>So, I decided to call upon some experts in the fields of sex research and education to help devise a multiple-choice exam for grown-ups, one that incorporates the key knowledge they find most lacking in the real world -- but without being a total snooze. After all, you're busy adults, and some of you no doubt find it difficult enough to make time for actual sex. I hope this will be less a realization of your lingering college exam nightmares than a fun challenge and, by gosh, a <em>learning experience</em>.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/28/sex_ed_9/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/28/sex_ed_9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The world&#8217;s sex ed toys</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/sex_ed_7/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/sex_ed_7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 01:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/09/07/sex_ed</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inspired by China's anatomically correct dolls, we've rounded up tools used around the globe for "the talk"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was confused to find that a <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/06/china-sex-ed-dolls_n_950636.html#s350811">Huffington Post article</a> about anatomically correct dolls used to teach sex ed to kindergartners in China came with the warning: "POTENTIALLY UNSETTLING PHOTOS BELOW." My goodness! I wondered: What kind of sick lesson plan for 5-year-olds would require an all-caps warning for an adult audience? I had the same reaction a while back when I caught a <a>CNN segment</a> about similar dollies being used to teach little ones in Indonesia about the birds and the bees. It was preceded by the warning: "This report includes graphic content. Viewer discretion is advised."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/sex_ed_7/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/09/08/sex_ed_7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Today&#8217;s must-see viral videos</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/viral_videos_seven_minutes_in_heaven_hoda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/viral_videos_seven_minutes_in_heaven_hoda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 21:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anderson Cooper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/08/18/viral_videos_seven_minutes_in_heaven_hoda</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Watch: Seven minutes in heaven with Hoda, the true meaning of crossword puzzles, and a dog walking itself]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
    <strong>1. Dog walks itself:</strong>
  </p><p>I think there's a lot to be said for this video, and I might not be the person to say it. It's so simple, yet so profoundly sad. Why <a href="http://viralviralvideos.tumblr.com/post/8847820081/dog-takes-himself-on-a-walk-all-is-right-in-the">is this dog walking itself</a>, you may ask. Where did its master go? Where is the dog planning to go next? And is it just a sad statement on our society that some kids taping this poor ole' guy on the boardwalk think it's "awesome" that this dog is forlornly carrying its own leash in its mouth?</p><p>
    <object height="390" width="449"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/xAJlcQPoKv4&amp;rel=0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/xAJlcQPoKv4&amp;rel=0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;version=3" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="449"></embed></object>
  </p><p>&#160;</p><p>
    <strong>2. Anderson Cooper loves that Gerard Depardieu urination story:</strong>
  </p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/viral_videos_seven_minutes_in_heaven_hoda/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/18/viral_videos_seven_minutes_in_heaven_hoda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The evolution of Dan Savage</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/dan_savage_interview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/dan_savage_interview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 00:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/08/16/dan_savage_interview</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our favorite stuntman talks about his new Rick Santorum plot and why he won't believe Obama -- but supports him]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The evolution of Dan Savage from sex columnist to political stunt artist has been an inspiring, and often really dirty, tale.</p><p>Early readers who discovered his <a href="http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=9435660">Savage Love</a> advice column (which he launched in 1991 for Seattle's the Stranger and which went into heavy syndication in the nation's free weeklies) were first jarred by how readers' questions began -- "Hey, Faggot," Savage's attempt to reclaim and defuse the word -- then hooked by his remarkably candid style. In that just barely pre-Internet world, when sex was a subject left to breathy advice columnists in the glossies and late-night radio, Savage was like a breath of fresh air. Or maybe a quick whiff of poppers.</p><p>His was a blazing, rude voice bursting out in a '90s culture still weirded out by reports of teens, gays and presidents actually having sex. Along the way, he dropped the "faggot" tag, created a wildly popular podcast, and coined irresistible expressions -- from "GGG" (his advice that partners should be "good, giving and game"), to "pegging" and "diamondbacking" (go ahead, look them up) -- that are as rudely hilarious as he is. He's got a show <a href="http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/04/03/Dan_Savage_Heading_to_Mtv/">slated for MTV</a>, and he's emerged as the leading voice not only on sex information but also sexual identity, and may well be the most effective gay rights spokesman around.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/dan_savage_interview/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/08/17/dan_savage_interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pop Torn: 10 pieces of cultural ambivalence</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/pop_torn_shia_manson_lowe_peterson/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/pop_torn_shia_manson_lowe_peterson/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bristol Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Celebrity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Documentaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lady Gaga]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Torn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viral Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/07/09/pop_torn_shia_manson_lowe_peterson</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week we're on the fence about: Rob Lowe as Drew Peterson, Shia LaBeouf's film about Marilyn Manson, and more!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2011/07/05/us_casey_anthony_trial_2/index.html">Casey Anthony</a>. <a href="http://www.salon.com/news/rupert_murdoch/index.html?story=/news/feature/2011/07/08/defending_murdoch_and_the_fourth_estate">Rupert Murdoch</a>. <a href="http://salon.com/news/africa/index.html?story=/news/feature/2011/07/08/af_south_sudan_independence">South Sudan</a>. OK, have you got that out of your system yet? Good, because it's time for our weekly roundup of the cultural news that will really have you going "Oh. That's&#8230; weird?" Continue if you dare.</p><p><strong>1. Lady Gaga's dark secret:</strong> Biographer Ian Halperin is telling the world that Gaga is <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2012203/Lady-Gaga-sick-obsessed-weight.html">a sick drug addict who is obsessed with her weight</a>.&#160; OK, but is she really <a href="http://www.nme.com/news/daily-gossip/48832">bisexual</a>??</p><p><strong>2. Bristol Palin questioned on "stolen virginity":</strong> Barbara Walters calls out the memoirist for her description <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/2011/06/21/bristol_palin_my_journey_so_far_rape">of her first time having sex with Levi Johnston</a>. Walters: "It must have been OK, because you kept on having sex with him, yeah?"</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/pop_torn_shia_manson_lowe_peterson/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/07/09/pop_torn_shia_manson_lowe_peterson/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Syphilis scare campaign: Sorely lacking</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/stds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/stds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/06/29/stds</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Canadians show how not to raise awareness, with a parody dating site that stigmatizes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Officials in Canada just dusted off an old standby in sex education: scaring the living daylights out of young people. More specifically, convincing them that by having sex they will end up an unlovable mess of warts and oozing sores -- until they die a premature death. Only this time the message is delivered in a hip new package: It's an anti-syphilis PSA masquerading as a dating site, PlentyofSyph.com. It's all thanks to the Alberta government's new $2 million awareness campaign.</p><p>The parody of the popular dating site PlentyofFish.com features countless profiles of hot, young, promiscuous things with syphilis. A sexy bachelorette explains why she isn't into waiting past the second date for some action: "im in the last stage of syphilis so im gonna be gettin nerve system problems and some brain disorder issue." A bachelor uses his complete hairlessness as a selling point: "Started getting patchy hair loss from my syphilis, so I figured I&#8217;d just shave it ALL off. That's right, all 240lbs of me hairless." Those are the tame examples; there are vivid descriptions of full-body rashes and pus-filled sores. Should you attempt to contact one of these fine young fictional singles, a shaming message will pop up -- for example, "I guess seizures, dementia, blindness and tumors turn you on."</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/stds/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/29/stds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did the stars of &#8220;16 and Pregnant&#8221; talk to a doctor?</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/13/teen_confidentiality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/13/teen_confidentiality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PopRX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/06/13/teen_confidentiality</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Adolescent medicine can be a legal minefield, but we need confidential consultations to keep teens healthy]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>During a routine checkup, a 15-year-old patient perched on the exam table; her mother sat in a chair across from me. After posing a few opening questions, I politely asked the girl's mother to leave so I could speak to her 15-year-old daughter alone.</p><p>A little private time is common in consultations with teens; it gives them the opportunity to be honest about various behaviors, including sexual activity, that they wouldn't discuss in front of their parents. CDC statistics show a third of girls in the U.S. are sexually active by age 15, so these talks can make the difference between a teenage girl staying healthy by practicing safe sex, and becoming a star on the next season of <a href="http://www.mtv.com/shows/16_and_pregnant/season_2/series.jhtml">"16 and Pregnant."</a></p><p>The MTV show has generated a lot of controversy because of the way the mothers and mothers-to-be on the program behaved after they'd decided to have a child. But, for a pediatrician like me, the show raises a different question: Did these young women have the chance to talk privately with their doctors before MTV started shooting their second trimester?</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/06/13/teen_confidentiality/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/06/13/teen_confidentiality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>32</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sex, lies and STDs</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/15/std_lies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/15/std_lies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 May 2011 00:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/05/14/std_lies</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A buzzy lawsuit brings up a common phenomenon: People lying about, or concealing, their true status]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TMZ's week was sure made by news that an A-list celebrity was being <a href="http://www.tmz.com/2011/05/11/a-list-male-celebrity-herpes-lawsuit-las-vegas-100-million-net-worth-contracted-unprotected-sex/">sued for spreading herpes.</a> An anonymous woman filed a $20 million lawsuit against the unnamed star, claiming that he knowingly exposed her to the virus, which she was diagnosed with after their fling.</p><p>This isn't the first time an STD lawsuit has made headlines (see: <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/documents/crime/michael-vick-hit-sex-suit">Michael Vick</a>, <a href="http://gone-hollywood.com/2010/08/9-celebrities-living-with-stds/">David Hasselhoff</a> and <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/1992/08/09/style/the-sexes-pillow-talk.html?sec=health&amp;&amp;n=Top%2fReference%2fTimes%20Topics%2fPeople%2fW%2fWilliams%2c%20Robin&amp;pagewanted=print">Robin Williams</a>), nor is it a phenomenon reserved for big-name celebs. For example, in 2009, a California woman <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,500447,00.html">won a $7 million lawsuit</a> against the (very rich) man who concealed his status and gave her herpes. These hard-to-win cases are extremely rare -- but anecdotally, at least, the dishonesty around this subject is hardly unusual. I decided to talk to people about how they had lied, and been lied to, about incurable but common STDs like herpes and HPV. I found that once I started asking around, it wasn't difficult to find stories of deception -- during one-night stands and long-term committed relationships alike.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/05/15/std_lies/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/05/15/std_lies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>105</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adults scarred by sex ed website</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/27/maria_talks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/27/maria_talks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 20:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abstinence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Birth Control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teenagers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/04/27/maria_talks</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alarmed lawmakers are trying to shutter MariaTalks.org for its crude teen slang. Who are they protecting, exactly?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could not visit <a href="http://www.mariatalks.com/">MariaTalks.com</a> fast enough when I heard that Massachusetts lawmakers were calling for the state-funded sex education website to be shut down over its use of vulgar language. "The language that is used on this site is disgusting," said Representative Elizabeth Poirier. "There are words that I would find difficult to speak." State Rep. Marc Lombardo added, "This website uses inappropriate and crude language to describe sexual acts." <em>Oh goody</em>, I thought. I'm usually amused by examples of the frank sex talk that disturbs full-blown adults -- but in this case the offensive language thoroughly disappointed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/27/maria_talks/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/27/maria_talks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Daily Cramp attempts to explain PMS to your boyfriend</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/22/daily_cramp_period_newsletter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/22/daily_cramp_period_newsletter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/entertainment/tv/feature/2011/04/22/daily_cramp_period_newsletter</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Offensive or helpful? A daily newsletter walks guys through each stage of a partner's period]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I could just speak to the guys in the audience here for a second: Fellas, how annoying is it when you're planning a nice night with your girlfriend and she comes home all crazy with PMS? Just demanding all the chocolate in your pantry, crying constantly and talking about her ovaries. And the worst part is if you ask her about it, she'll just get even angrier for "assuming" her emotions are related to her menstrual cycle. It's like you can't win!</p><p>That's where <a href="http://www.thedailycramp.com/">The Daily Cramp</a> comes in. I'll let the site explain itself:</p><blockquote>
<p>Let's face it ... men simply don't understand women. And there's a reason for that: women have a hormonal cycle that we don't have. It's like they're taking uppers and downers every day, and we don't know which pill they swallowed.</p>
<p>The Daily Cramp is a once daily newsletter that helps men solve the greatest mystery of the last 10,000 years: women. It's 1 part science, 1 part Dear Abby, and all parts funny.</p>
<p>We were conceived after one wild night in Miami and delivered at Startup Weekend Miami on November 21, 2010.</p>
</blockquote><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/22/daily_cramp_period_newsletter/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/22/daily_cramp_period_newsletter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tennessee&#8217;s &#8220;don&#8217;t say gay&#8221; bill advances</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/22/tennessee_gay_bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/22/tennessee_gay_bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War Room]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/news/politics//war_room/2011/04/22/tennessee_gay_bill</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One state legislator's campaign to make it easier to bully children]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numskulls and bigots elected to various state legislatures in the last election will be, like Bush and Reagan's many judges, the longest-lasting and probably most damaging consequence of the recent Republican resurgence. Because in state governments, where the national press seldom ventures, where local newspapers are operating with tiny staffs and shrinking readerships, and where local TV news is largely useless, these morons are basically able to pass any fool idea lobbyists and far-right think tanks can cook up -- and there is an entire cottage industry devoted to cooking up awful ideas for Republican state legislatures to pass. (Bills like Arizona's immigration crackdown do not spring fully formed from the minds of cretinous state senators.)</p><p>In Tennessee, for example, state Sen. Stacey Campfield <a href="http://joemygod.blogspot.com/2011/04/tennessee-dont-say-gay-education-bill.html">has succeeded</a> in getting the state Senate Education Committee to <a href="http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2011/apr/21/dont-say-gay-bill-clears-senate-panel/">approve a bill prohibiting teachers</a> from talking about homosexuality. The bill, which will make it "illegal to discuss any sexual behavior other than heterosexuality prior to the ninth grade," will now move to the floor of the Senate.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/04/22/tennessee_gay_bill/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/04/22/tennessee_gay_bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>54</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The &#8220;live sex show&#8221; professor speaks</title>
		<link>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/03/sex_ed_6/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/03/sex_ed_6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 23:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[All Salon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Love and Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pornography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex Education]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salon.com/life//feature/2011/03/03/sex_ed</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Northwestern's Bailey: "I couldn't think of a legitimate good reason why people shouldn't be allowed to see that"]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If he had it to do over again, professor John Michael Bailey says he probably wouldn't allow a live sex demonstration in his human sexualities class at Northwestern University -- but not because he thinks it was inappropriate. A weary-sounding Bailey, reached by phone this afternoon, told me that on principle he stands by his decision to let one guest presenter use a sex toy -- rather unsubtly known as the "fucksaw" -- to bring another presenter to repeated orgasm in front of his students. But he says it simply wasn't worth "the fallout," which has included coverage from every mainstream news outlet from the Associated Press to MSNBC. Following the media pickup, the university's president, Morton Schapiro, issued a statement criticizing Bailey's "extremely poor judgment" and announcing an official investigation.</p><p>So why did he allow it to happen? It was part of an optional lecture -- which came with multiple warnings about explicit content -- after his human sexuality class. It featured three guests involved in the BDSM scene who were planning to talk about their kinky lifestyle. It happened that the presenters arrived early during the professor's lecture on the g-spot and female ejaculation, both of which are scientifically controversial. When it came time for the guests' presentation, one of them, Jim Marcus, suggested that he and his fianc&#233;e, another speaker, provide a genuine example of female ejaculation right there on the spot. After brief hesitation, Bailey agreed.</p><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2011/03/03/sex_ed_6/">Continue Reading...</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salon.com/2011/03/03/sex_ed_6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>55</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

